DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK· VIRGINIA National Battlefield Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK· VIRGINIA National Battlefield Park .NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK· VIRGINIA National Battlefield Park UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • ]. A. Krug, Secretary National Park Service • Newton B. Drury, Director Capital of the Conj ederacy, Richmond became for 4 years the objective of the Federal Armies in the East RICHMOND THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN SYMBOL OF THE SOUTH GEN. GEORGE B. McCLELLAN'S ill-starred cam­ paign in the spring and summer of 1862 brought RICHMOND, VA., as capital of the Confederate battles to the very gates of Richmond, which in States of America during the Civil War, 1861--65, the aggregate surpassed in magnitude any pre­ was regarded as the symbol of the Southern Gov­ viously fought in the Western Hemisphere. The ernment. In consequence, throughout the con­ Federal plan of attack involved a giant pincer flict, Federal Armies made repeated attempts to movement against the Confederate Capital. capture this important city. Seven "on to Rich­ McClellan, with the Army of the Potomac, mond" drives, in the Eastern Theater of War, was expected to effect a landing on the penin­ were aimed at the Confederate Capital. Five of sula between the James and the York Rivers these were turned back some distance away, two and to advance from the east, while Gen. Irvin at Manassas and three in the vicinity of Fred­ McDowell, with a second Federal Army, ericksburg, while two act\lally brought the fight­ marched overland from Washington to join ing dangerously close to the Capital. From a McClellan's troops as they approached Rich­ strategic point of view the selection of Rich­ mond. McClellan brought his forces to the pen­ mond, near the head of the navigable James insula by water, and, after compelling the River and within 110 miles of the Federal Cap­ Southern forces to withdraw from their forti­ ital at Washington, D. C. , was not ideal. Never­ fications at Yorktown, pushed steadily forward. theless, for 4 years the city was successfully Toward the end of May, he had reached a point defended against all attacks and was not evac­ so close to Richmond that his observers in uated until after General Grant had broken the balloons could see the church spires of the city. Confederate lines at Petersburg, April 2, 1865. McDowell, on his southward march, had ar­ By then almost every part of the South had been rived at Fredericksburg and expected to join overrun. When Richmond was abandoned, on McClellan for the final move on Richmond. In April 3, there followed swiftly the surrender of the meantime, however, Gen. T.]. (Stonewall) General Lee at Appomattox, and the end of the Jackson, at the head of the Confederate troops Southern Confederacy. in the Shenandoah Valley, made a series of COVER: Capitol Square, Richmond, about 1860. From a contemporary print. Courtesy Library of Congress. lightning-like moves which endangered the July 1. At Malvern Hill the Federals, in a strong National Capital, and McDowell was recalled position commanding the James River, resisted for the protection of Washington. the Confederate attacks; that night they moved On May 31 , Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, com­ away to their new base at Harrison's Landing. manding the defense of Richmond, attacked Only McClellan's skillful handling of his un­ McClellan in the Battle of Seven Pines, or Fair wieldy masses in retreat, combined with Con, Oaks as it is also called. The Confederates .were federate mistakes, saved the Army of the Poto­ repulsed and Johnston was wounded, but the mac from destruction. In the Peninsula cam­ battle disclosed to the Federals the immense paign the defense of their Capital cost the Con­ difficulties that would be experienced should federates 28,431 men out of 69,732 engaged, they continue the march on Richmond. while the Federals lost 23 ,119 out of a total When the two armies next clashed, Robert number of 116,102 troops. E. Lee was at the head of the Southern forces, After the Seven Days' Battles and McClellan's and the Federals were on the defensive. withdrawal from Harrison's Landing, nearly 2 McClellan had delayed too long before the years passed before the armies returned to the city, and the interval of calm had given Lee gates of Richmond to fight again. In the mean­ time to gather reinforcements from Georgia time, the earthen forts and breastworks were The moat in front of Confederate trenches, The Watt House, Gen. Fitz-John Porter's and the Carolinas. Toward the end ofJune the strengthened and extended until, by 1864, the Fort Harrison. headquarters, Gaines' Mill. Confederates took the offensive in an attempt city was almost encircled by three lines of de­ to cut the Federals from their supply base at fense. During this time also, three Federal at­ with the avowed objective of crushing Lee'-s minutes Grant's fate in this engagement was White House on the Pamunkey River. On tempts on Richmond were turned aside-at Sec­ army and capturing Richmond. A month of definitely sealed, and in that brief period his June 26, Lee attacked and dislodged the Fed­ ond Manassas and Fredericksburg, in August hard fighting left the battlefields of the Wilder­ casualties exceeded 7,000 in killed and wounded. eral outposts at Mechanicsville, but was severely and December 1862, and at Chancellorsville, in ness, Spotsylvania Court House, North Anna, Desultory fighting continued until noon. repulsed at Beaver Dam Creek nearby. McClel­ May of 1863. In this interval the Confederate and the Totopotomoy behind, and by June 1 The Battle of Cold Harbor, which saved lan, however, fell back that night to the vicinity forces had twice invaded Northern territory, his troops were moving in on Cold Harbor, a Richmond for another 9 months, proved to be of Gaines' Mill where, the next day, he received meeting with defeat at Antietam, September strategic crossroads in the approach to Lee's last major victory in the field. Grant, in an assault delivered with such violent impact 1862, and at Gettysburg, July 1863. Richmond. later years, acknowledged his mistake at Cold that he was compelled to begin a hasty though The one day for which the Battle of Cold Harbor and wrote in his Memoirs, "I have always masterfully organized retreat to the James River. COLD HARBOR Harbor is best remembered is June 3, 1864. regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor In rapid succession followed the bitterly IN MAY 1864, Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, newly Here, on part of the old battlefield of Gaines' was ever made." His losses for the period June contested battles of Savage Station, June 29; appointed supreme commander of the Federal Mill, Grant shifted his five corps, 117,343 2-15, 1864, numbered 12,737, while Lee's losses Frayser:s Farm, June 30; and Malvern Hill, forces, personally joined his troops in the field, troops, into position along a 6-mile front and for the same period are estimated to have been issued orders for an attack on Lee's lines for under 2,000. The use of field fortifications in The parapet of Union Fort Burnham (formerly Confederate Fort Harrison). 4:30 a. m., June 3. Lee, with approximately this battle further established their value in From a wartime photograph. 60,000 troops, posted his men and artillery be­ modern warfare . ,, hind earthworks which commanded every field of approach on a front extending from near THE LAST 10 MONTHS Grapevine Bridge to a point beyond Mechanics­ BY JUNE 15, Grant had moved south of the ville. James River to Petersburg. Here the conflict Grant's orders were executed promptly. The continued, chiefly in the form of siege opera­ troops advanced under a deafening roar of artil­ tions, until April 2, 1865, when the Confed­ lery and rattle of musketry that was immedi­ erate lines were severed. In the meantime, sev­ ately echoed by Lee's lines. Soon all was con­ eral thrusts were made against Richmond from fusion. Federal soldiers penetrated the Confed­ north of the James. The most important of erate right flank only to be repulsed. Lee's these culminated in the capture of Fort Harri­ position was well selected, and the cross-fire son, a strongly fortified position considered the of his artillery was deadly in its effect. In 30 key to Richmond. The Confederates built new fortifications to compensate for this loss and Military Park; Petersburg National Military along these respective lines the opposing forces Park; and Appomattox Court House National faced each other until Richmond was aban­ Historical Monument. doned on April 3, 1865. RICHMOND NATIONAL Upon evacuation of the city, the Confederate HOW TO REACH THE PARK BATTLEFIELD PARK government authorized the burning of ware­ THE park headquarters and museum, located at houses and supplies. This resulted in consider­ Fort Harrison, 10 miles southeast of the Cap­ VIRGINIA able destruction to houses in the business dis­ itol Square in Richmond, is reached by way of Note: M ileages shown denote trict. The end of the war was now close at hand. distance from Broad Street and Virginia Routes 5 and 156. A Richmond, Virginia. Lee, with the remnant of his army, surrendered complete tour of the battlefield requires a 57- to Grant at Appomattox Court House, April mile drive and is outlined on the map. 9, 1865. THE PARK FACILITIES RICHMOND National Battlefield Park was estab­ MARKERS, maps, and interpretive devices situ­ lished July 14, 1944, in accordance with an act ated along the 57-mile battlefield park route of Congress dated March 2, 1936. The property help the visitor to understand the military oper­ was originally acquired by a group of public­ ations. Additional information may be obtained spirited Virginians who donated it to the Com­ at park headquarters, where a small museum monwealth of Virginia in 1932.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
    “Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: an Explanation and Case Study
    Journal of Leadership Education Volume 11, Issue 1 – Winter 2012 Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: An Explanation and Case Study Bradley Z. Hull, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Logistics Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Scott J. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Management Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Abstract The authors describe an exploratory analytical tool called The 5Ps Leadership Analysis (Personal Attributes, Position, Purpose, Practices/Processes, and Product) as a heuristic for better understanding the complexities of leadership. Using The 5Ps Leadership Analysis , the authors explore the leadership of General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia and General George B. McClellan of the Union Army of the Potomac—more specifically, the leadership of the two generals on September 17, 1862 during the Battle of Antietam. The paper concludes with suggestions for application in the classroom. Introduction This case study examines how two organizations compete and how two leaders can influence change and success given their resources. One organization is small and underfinanced with antiquated equipment. The other is large, well financed, and organized along traditional lines where each part of the organization operates autonomously and is coordinated by top levels of management. This type of confrontation between a small organization and a large competitor occurs often in American business. Two relevant examples might be Dell (in its early days) versus Compaq and Amazon.com (in its early days) versus Barnes and Noble or the now bankrupt Borders.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Republican Army: the Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Fall 2017 Article 14 The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War Zachery Fry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Fry, Zachery (2017) "The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 4 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.19.4.19 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol19/iss4/14 Fry: The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicaliz Review Fry, Zachery Fall 2017 Matsui, John H. The First Republican Army: The Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War. University of Virginia Press, $39.50 ISBN 9780813939278 John Pope, the Army of Virginia, and the Road to Hard War Civil War historians find the political motives behind Union squabbles in the Eastern Theater fascinating. Scholars and lay readers alike can count on a constant barrage of books on the high command of the Army of the Potomac, for instance, replete with well-worn accounts of backstabbing by George McClellan, Fitz John Porter, and Joseph Hooker. Over the past several years, however, a critical mass of innovative literature by young scholars such as Timothy Orr and Jonathan White has emerged to investigate the rich intersections of soldier ideology and command politics, adding to earlier pioneering work by historians such as John Hennessy. Instead of debating how many Union soldiers embraced emancipation, as scholars of the 1990s and early 2000s did, historians now want to know what that undeniable ideological divide meant for command and control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Have I Seen Such a Charge” Pender’s Light Division at Gettysburg, July 1 D. Scott Hartwig It was July 1 at Gettysburg and the battle west of town had been raging furiously since 1:30 p.m. By dint of only the hardest fighting troops of Major General Henry Heth’s and Major General Robert E. Rodes’s divisions had driven elements of the Union 1st Corps from their positions along McPherson’s Ridge, back to Seminary Ridge. Here, the bloodied Union regiments and batteries hastily organized a defense to meet the storm they all knew would soon break upon them. This was the last possible line of defense beyond the town and the high ground south of it. It had to be held as long as possible. To break this last line of Union resistance, Confederate Third Corps commander, Lieutenant General Ambrose P. Hill, committed his last reserve, the division of Major General Dorsey Pender. They were the famed Light Division of the Army of Northern Virginia, boasting a battle record from the Seven Days battles to Chancellorsville unsurpassed by any other division in the army. Arguably, it may have been the best division in Lee’s army. Certainly no organization of the army could claim more combat experience. Now, Hill would call upon his old division once more to make a desperate assault to secure victory. In many ways their charge upon Seminary Ridge would be symbolic of why the Army of Northern Virginia had enjoyed an unbroken string of victories through 1862 and 1863, and why they would meet defeat at Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanover Courthouse: the Nionu 'S Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Winter 1999 Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Coggeshall, Jerry J.. "Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure" (1999). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/f9k9-0564 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HANOVER COURTHOUSE: THE UNION'S TACTICAL VICTORY AND STRATEGIC FAILURE by Jerry Joseph Coggeshail B.A. May 1997, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 1999 Harold S. Wilson (Director) Annecce nnie Sweeneys Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Coggeshall, Jerry Joseph All rights reserved. UMI__ ® UMI Microform 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin
    Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin. The Life and Public Services of Ambrose E. Burnside. Providence, Rhode Island: J.A. & R.A. Reid, 1882. E B967p Woodbury, Augustus. Major General Ambrose E. Burnside and the Ninth Army Corps. Providence: S.S. Rider & Brother, 1867. F834 P86.9 W884 David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870) Duffy, James P. Lincoln’s Admiral: The Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut. New York: Wiley, 1997. E F2393d Farragut, Loyall. The Life of David Glasgow Farragut, First Admiral of the United States Navy, Embodying his Journal and Letters. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1879. E F2393f Hill, Jim Dan. Sea Dogs of the Sixties: Farragut and Seven Contemporaries. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1935. F8347 H646s Lewis, Charles Lee. David Glasgow Farragut. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute, 1941- 43. E F2393L Mahan, A.T. Admiral Farragut. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1897. E F2393m Andrew Hull Foote (1806-1863) Hoppins, J. M. Life of Andrew Hull Foote, Rear-Admiral United States Navy. New York: Harper & Bros., 1874. E F688h Ulysses Simpson Grant (1822-1885) Catton, Bruce. Grant Moves South. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988, c1960. F896.3 G76cat2 1988 Catton, Bruce. Grant Takes Command. Boston: Little, Brown, 1969. F896.3 G76cat3 1990 Grant, Ulysses S. Memoirs and Selected Letters: Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant, Selected Letters 1839-1865. New York: Library of America, 1990. F896.3 G759p 1990 Lewis, Lloyd. Captain Sam Grant. Boston: Little, Brown, 1950. F896.3 G76Le McFeely, William S. Grant: A Biography. New York: Norton, 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Invasions – the Union in Peril Part 1 – the Maryland Campaign: Antietam and Emancipation Class Notes
    Confederate Invasions – The Union In Peril Part 1 – The Maryland Campaign: Antietam and Emancipation Class Notes Lecture 2 – “You Are All Green Alike”: Campaigns of 1861-1862 A. Both Sides Mobilize • North has advantages in manpower; manufacturing; and railroad network • South has advantages in 3.5 million slaves; armed state militias; geography • U.S. military has only 15,000 men; 42 ships (only 3 ready on 15 Apr) • Many Southern officers resign, join Confederacy • Lee turns down command of Federal forces; Goes with Virginia B. Political & Military Strategies • Lincoln and Davis – contrasting Commanders-in-Chief • Union Strategy: Scott’s Anaconda Plan – Subdue south with minimum of bloodshed • Southern Strategy: Defend the homeland and erode Union public support • Northern Pressure to Act: On to Richmond C. Eastern Theater – First Manassas; McClellan’s Peninsula Campaign • First Manassas/Bull Run (21 July 1861) – demolishes many myths • Rise of McClellan - “Little Napoleon” • Lincoln forced to become his own general-in-chief • Peninsula Campaign (April-May 1862) – plan to flank Confederate defenses • Army of Potomac, 100,000 strong, advances slowly, cautiously • Battle of Seven Pines – Johnston wounded; Lee assumes command • Jackson’s Valley Campaign – one bright spot for Confederacy D. Western Theater – 1862 Early Union Successes – Grant Emerges • Grant captures Forts Henry & Donelson in February 1861 • Nashville is abandoned by retreating Confederates • Battle of Pea Ridge (8 March): Union victory • Battle of Shiloh (6-7 April): Grant again victorious • New Orleans falls to Admiral Farragut on 25 April • Halleck’s Union forces capture Memphis on 6 June E. Political Dimension • Despite Union successes in the Western Theater, the key to victory in the Civil War is the public’s “will to continue” in the face of mounting costs.
    [Show full text]
  • 629.L332 2097 3 CHIVA *' -Liliilffiilflfiililililififliie L BRARY
    629.L332 2097 3 CHIVA *' -liliilffiilflfiililililIfifliiE L BRARY 24065 U.S. Infantry troops break camp June 30' 1898'for the attack on El Caney, Cuba Note the balloon Santiago above the tree line. Courtesy of the National Archives. In the 1780s Benjarnin Franklin was the United States'minister to France. At one of the Montgolfier brothers first balloon laurchings a cynical observer rernarked, "Of what possible use is it?" Said Franklin, who foresaw many possibilities for aeronautics, "Of what use is a newborn babe?" THE HISTORY OF The United States Air Force taces its origins EARLY to the establishment of the Aeronautical Dvision, created on August l, 1907 by the ENLISTED Chief Signal Officer of the Army However, the U.S. Army frst used "aerial devices" for AERONAUTICS military purposes during the American Civil War. when it created an unofficial balloon section. An offrcial balloon section was established in 1891. Consequently, enlisted 1862 TO 1907 support for U.S. military aviation began with Civil War balloon operations. Interest in the military applications of ballooning in the United States can be linked by to one of our nation's forefathers, Benjamin William I. Chivalette Franklin. After witnessing the flight of the and Montgolfiers (famous balloonists), Franklin W. Parker Hayes,Jr. predicted that the military would soon find uses for the balloon. But it was not until Airmen Memorial Museum 1840, during the Second Seminole War, that his prediction almost proved true. The Seminoles, intimate with the without being apprized of the balloonist's tangled swamps of their Florida homeland, scheme. persistently evaded capture by the army sent to During the Civil War, balloons were force their "removal" to the Indian Territory in used by both sides, but mostly by the North, the West.
    [Show full text]
  • \U25a0jßfciw If
    tp \u25a0jßfciw if VOL. VIII. ST. PAUL, SATURDAY MORNING, JUNE 20, 1886 -TWELVE PAGES. N"O. 17 7 By Wilson, this time Eeno had began to unfortunate soldiers. Ifgentlemen thought j Evans, . Logan, v^.f- (la.) the men proved 1 : clinched. Trussell himself* ON A BLOODY FIELD. retreat to the hill several hundred AFTER LONG WAITING. they were making 'creditable,'' history . let Fryc, \ Manderson, CARDIFF THE VICTOR. good go himself, referee ana jumped between yards in his rear and, as Gall said, "We them on. For while he lived thorn -with spirit. Tho Minneapolitan he would appeal to the nonorof Macountry, (Recapitulation: Yeas, Republican 7 [in- good knew we had him safe. We moved olf ; 23; b~t in work again and sent Sail, the Great Sioux Chief, Tells the The Senate Yesterday Passed the House to the integrity of its people and to the cluding It.ddlebergcr.clnd.;] Democrats The Long-Anticipatod couple down where the other soldiers were, in- 1 Match Wilson to lean on the rope a JUSTICE BIS CAUSE nays, .-Republican The Democrats are Between for of tending or • IT. seconds. They passed a few exchanges, Story of the Pall of Ouster's to settle them and then come Billfor Gen. Pitz John Porter's pleaded poor \u25a0 marked with *.) Heavy- Weights and while ho for the Union men a tho Rival of Cardiff clinched again Afoul was claimed, back after him." He said, however, that Reinstatement, against of our own side who proved number of pairs announced. Mr. Command. enough already those A were the Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Signature Tours Virginia Sesquicentennial of the American Civil War Commission
    Proposed Signature Tours Virginia Sesquicentennial of the American Civil War Commission The Commission may wish to consider sponsoring a series of signature tours, including battlefield tours as well as historical tours of particular cities, regions, or sites in Virginia which played a prominent role in the Civil War. These tours could be held in conjunction with regular meetings of the Commission. For example, a commission meeting, with a reception and dinner, might be held the night before the tour, with local participation. A keynote speaker might provide an introduction for each tour. The city or regional tours could take a broader view of the Civil War era, and include the most significant sites in that particular area. The battlefield tours might be scheduled one or two months prior to the actual commemoration dates of the battles, in order to raise public awareness in advance of events which may be planned locally. In each case, local government officials and the media should be included, along with the local Civil War sesquicentennial committee, if one has been appointed, and representatives of local colleges and universities, and museums. Efforts should also be made to involve students and young persons. June 25-26, 2009: Kick-Off Tour in Harpers Ferry Focus: The Commission’s first tour is being planned in conjunction with a series of events commemorating John Brown’s raid (October 17, 1859). This tour will include an evening reception and dinner, a panel presentation, and the tour. In addition to the lower town of Harpers Ferry and the site of the federal arsenal, the tour may include Bolivar Heights, Schoolhouse Ridge and the Murphy Farm, covering Stonewall Jackson’s victory of September 15, 1862, immediately preceding the Battle of Antietam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maine Bugle 1894
    r THE MAINE BUGLE. Entered at the Po$t Office, Rockland, Me., at Second-Ctati Matter. Campaign I. January, 1894. Call i Its echoing notes your memories shall renew From sixty-one until the grant! review. UBLISHED QUARTERLY, JANUARY, APRIL, JULY AND OCTOBER, AND WILL BE THE ORGAN OF THE " MEN OF MAINE " WHO SERVED IN THE WAR OF THE REBELLION. NO OTHER STATE HAS A PROUDER RECORD. IT WILL CONTAIN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THEIR YEARLY REUNIONS, MATTERS OF HISTORIC VALUE TO EACH REGI- MENT, AND ITEMS OF PERSONAL INTEREST TO ALL ITS MEMBERS. IT IS ALSO THE ORGAN OF THE CAVALRY SOCIETY OF THE ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL PUBLISH THE ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS OF THAT SOCIETY AND CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE VARIOUS REGIMENTS NORTH AND SOUTH WHICH PARTICIPATED IN THE WAR OF THE REBELUON. PRICE ONE DOLLAR A YEAR, OR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS A CALL Editors, Committees from the Maine Regiments. Published by the Maine Association. Address, J. P. Cuxey, Treasurer, RoCKlAND, Mainb. L rs^^ A . A. 41228 Save Money. — Regular Subscribers and those not regular subscribers to the Bugle may, by ordering through us the periodicals for which they arc subscrib- ers, add Bf r.i.E at a greatly reduced price if not without cost. Thus if you wish, let us say, Cosmopolitan and Harper^s Monthly, send the money through this ofTice and we will add Bugle to the list without extra cost. Regular With Price Bugle Arena, *5-oo Army and Navy Journal, Atlantic Monthly, Blue and CIray, Canadian Sportsman, Cassel's Family Magazine, Century, Cosmopolitan, Current Literature, Decorator and Furnisher, Demorest's Family Magazine Fancier, Godey's Ladies' Book, Harper's Bazar or Weekly, Harper's Magazine, Harper's Young People, Home Journal, Horseman, Illustrated American, Journal of Military Service and Institution, Judge, Life, Lippincott's Magazine, Littell's Living Age, North American Review, New England Magazine, Outing, Popular Science Monthly, Public Opinion, Review of Reviews, Scicntiiic American, Supplement, Both, same address.
    [Show full text]