Between Liverpool Street and Collins Street

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Between Liverpool Street and Collins Street City of Hobart Campbell Street Traffic Observations Report August 2019 Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Network aspirations ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Purpose of this report........................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.5 Scope and limitations ........................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Study area ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Road network ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Site conditions ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. Proposed use of road space .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Hospital service lane ............................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Bus ‘super stop’ ................................................................................................................... 4 4. Site visit observations .................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Lane utilisation ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Traffic signal impacts ......................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Other network observations ............................................................................................... 14 5. Road authority consultation ......................................................................................................... 16 5.1 Traffic behaviour ................................................................................................................ 16 5.2 Traffic signal operation ...................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Proposed use of road space .............................................................................................. 17 6. Road function assessment ........................................................................................................... 18 6.1 Road use hierarchy and priorities ...................................................................................... 18 6.2 Campbell Street function ................................................................................................... 19 6.3 Road network capacity ...................................................................................................... 19 6.4 Road configuration under proposal .................................................................................... 26 7. Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 29 Table index Table 1 Campbell Street ................................................................................................................. 20 Table 2 Argyle Street ...................................................................................................................... 20 Table 3 Liverpool Street .................................................................................................................. 20 Table 4 Bathurst Street ................................................................................................................... 21 Table 5 Lane allocation for Campbell Street ................................................................................... 27 Table 6 Lane allocation for Liverpool Street ................................................................................... 28 GHD | Report for City of Hobart - Campbell Street, 3219329 | i Figure index Figure 1 Study area ............................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Shared use lane arrangement ............................................................................................. 4 Figure 3 Bus ‘super stop’ arrangement .............................................................................................. 5 Figure 4 Lane use Campbell Street on approach to Liverpool Street (inter-peak) ............................ 6 Figure 5 Lane use Campbell Street on approach to Bathurst Street (inter-peak) ............................. 7 Figure 6 Campbell Street right turn lane onto Collins Street (inter-peak) .......................................... 7 Figure 7 Lane use on Campbell Street approach to Macquarie Street (inter-peak) .......................... 8 Figure 8 Queueing through Campbell Street/Macquarie Street intersection (PM peak) ................... 9 Figure 9 Bathurst Street lane utilisation on approach to Campbell Street (PM peak) ....................... 9 Figure 10 Liverpool Street lane utilisation on approach to Campbell Street (inter-peak) .................. 10 Figure 11 Liverpool Street lane utilisation on approach to Argyle Street (AM peak) ......................... 10 Figure 12 Queueing on Brooker Highway turn lane (AM peak) ......................................................... 11 Figure 13 Typical queue at Campbell Street/Brisbane Street intersection (AM peak) ...................... 11 Figure 14 Bathurst Street queues on approach to Brooker Highway (PM peak) ............................... 12 Figure 15 Liverpool Street right turn lane onto Argyle Street ............................................................. 13 Figure 16 Liverpool Street observations ............................................................................................ 14 Figure 17 Hobart CBD road hierarchy ............................................................................................... 18 Figure 18 AM peak period v/c ratio (Current conditions) ................................................................... 22 Figure 19 AM peak period theoretical v/c ratio (reduced lane conditions) ......................................... 23 Figure 20 PM peak period v/c ratio (Current conditions) ................................................................... 24 Figure 21 PM peak period theoretical v/c ratio (reduced lane conditions) ......................................... 25 Figure 22 Shared use lane adjacent to Royal Hobart Hospital .......................................................... 26 Figure 23 Proposed bus ‘Super Stop’ location ................................................................................... 27 Appendices Appendix A – Observation Maps Appendix B – Recommendation Map GHD | Report for City of Hobart - Campbell Street, 3219329 | ii 1. Introduction GHD were engaged by City of Hobart to undertake an assessment of the performance of the Campbell Street corridor to ensure the feasibility of any proposed change in use of the road space. The assessment is required to provide an understanding of all transport modes, their operational and performance needs, how they impact on road capacity and the reliability of travel. In addition to the assessment of the performance of the Campbell Street corridor, the City of Hobart also requires an assessment of: Liverpool Street between the Railway roundabout and Argyle Street. Bathurst Street between the Railway roundabout and Argyle Street. Argyle Street between Liverpool Street and Brisbane Street. 1.1 Background During the reconstruction of the Royal Hobart Hospital (2016 – 2019), the traffic carrying capacity of Campbell Street was reduced from three lanes to two lanes, between Liverpool Street and Collins Street. The third lane was used as an access lane to support construction activities and was not available to general traffic. As the works at the Hospital are approaching completion, City of Hobart are preparing to regain the full road space and the potential use for the third lane. 1.2 Network aspirations The City of Hobart is considering the potential future use of the third, currently closed, lane on Campbell Street, with an aim of utilising this space for a larger purpose other than providing more capacity for cars. The future function of the Campbell Street corridor is influenced by the following characteristics: Anecdotally the Department of State Growth indicated that during construction of the Royal Hobart Hospital, a decrease in traffic flow occurred on Campbell Street. There is an anticipated rise in pedestrian activity due the presence of new and existing pedestrian generators (such as the Royal Hobart Hospital, the new UTAS Performing Arts Centre, the Theatre Royal, the University’s Medical Science
Recommended publications
  • HOBART FOOD TRUCKS Program Guidelines and Permit Conditions NOVEMBER 2019 2 TABLE of CONTENTS
    HOBART FOOD TRUCKS Program Guidelines and Permit Conditions NOVEMBER 2019 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 MAPS Principles 6 Hobart Interim Planning Scheme 2015 boundary 18 Values 6 Hobart Interim Planning Scheme Aims 6 2015 and Sullivans Cove Planning Definition 7 Scheme boundary – inner city and TRADING LOCATIONS 8 waterfront detail 19 Sullivan Cove Planning Scheme Greater CBD No Go Zone 20 trading exceptions 8 North Hobart Shopping Events & festivals 10 Precinct No Go Zone 21 No go zones 10 Brooker Highway No Go Zone 22 TRADING 11 Sandy Bay Shopping Precinct No Go Zone 23 Trading times and duration 11 Southern Outlet No Go Zone 24 Trading on Council land vs trading on private land 11 kunanyi/Mount Wellington No Go Zone 25 PERMIT 12 Permit fee 13 Delegatiopn to approve Hobart food truck permits 13 Permit reissue 13 Permit cancellation 13 PERMIT CONDITIONS 14 Health & safety 14 Trading times, location & duration 14 Community access 15 Noise 16 Waste 16 General 17 COMMUNICATION & PROMOTIONS 17 INFORMATION 17 Hobart Food Trucks Program Guidelines 2019–20 3 INTRODUCTION The Hobart Food Trucks program provides a framework within which the City of Hobart, local business and the community can enjoy the economic, social and cultural benefits of mobile food vending. The City is committed to supporting existing food and beverage businesses and aims to ensure that the program complements the city’s existing food and beverage economy. As a result, the program has been developed after extensive community and business consultation and the implementation of 12-month trial that took place from July 2015 to July 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Oma Ain H High Hwa Ay P Plann Ning G
    Tasmanian Government 2012 Submission to Nation Building 2 Program Domain Highway Planning (Part of Brooker Highway Upgrades submission to Infrastructure Australia) September 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Priority assigned by jurisdiction for NB2 Priority three under Innovation funding consideration Details of full scope of project, including Information on project objectives, strategic objectives, service requirements, project context and options analysis is discussed in status and project phase(s) seeking the Stage 1-6 template. funding. Note: It is expected that this will be largely addressed through the main IA submission. However, the Department requires cost estimates to be provided using the Best Practice Cost Estimation Standard and at both P50 and P90. Also to use both 4% and 7% for BCRs. Alignment with objectives of NB2 The Domain Highway Planning project is Note: This should include how a project submitted under the Innovation theme of aligns with the overarching objective of Nation Building 2, and also aligns with NB2, as well as how it aligns with the Connecting People and Moving Freight objective of each relevant NB2 subprogram. themes. The Domain Highway is a key urban freight and passenger connection in Greater Hobart. The Highway has two major high-volume interchanges with the Brooker Highway and Tasman Highway. The Domain Highway Interchange with the Brooker Highway is one of two key capacity bottlenecks on the Highway. This project will develop detailed design options at the Domain Highway Interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Road Futures
    TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2019 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Funding Total Funding Total Funding Total from cost from cost from cost 2019 2019 2019 Greater Hobart Traffic Solution $72.1M $93.8M Includes: East Tamar Highway $6M $7M Northern Road Upgrades State and Federal $44.9M $54.2M State and Federal – Mowbray Connector Midland Highway 10 year plan Control of Macquarie and Davey streets Includes: West Tamar Highway $11.2M $12M Bass Highway – Deloraine to Latrobe Southern Outlet fifth lane Traffic Solution: Pedestrian crossing Campbell Town River Derwent ferry service Gravelly Beach Road to Rosevears Drive Tasman Highway at Myrtle Park Traffic incident response Atkinsons Road and Waldhorn Drive Dorset Roads Package and transport access points Overtaking opportunities between Exeter Bus priorities and active transport initiatives and Batman Highway junction Tomahawk to Gladstone Northern suburbs light rail Resealing and widening north of Batman Prossers Road Highway intersection to Lightwood Hills Road Underground bus transit centre Esk Main Road Left turn lane Motor Road/West Greater Hobart master plan Tamar Highway junction Airport to Evandale Road Improved Hadspen access Urban Congestion Fund State $24M State and Federal $84.7M $0.4m Federal $58.7M State $58M State Bridgewater Bridge $576M Midland Highway 10 year plan $325M Hobart Congestion Package (linked to Federal $236M Federal $111.4M projects in Greater Hobart Traffic Solution) Roads of Strategic Importance: Bass State $25.8M North West Road Upgrades State and Federal $35.7M $50.1M Tasman Highway Intelligent Transport Systems Highway (Wynyard to Marrawah), $606M Hobart to Sorell corridor, Birralee Federal $205M Bass Highway (West of Wynyard), including South East Traffic Solution State and Federal $25.9M $27M Main Road, Old Surry Road/Massey- Brittons Swamp, Wynyard to Smithton passing Greene Drive, Murchison Highway, lanes, access to Boat Harbour Primary School Tasman Highway near Tasmania Golf Club Lyell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Fact Sheet
    Tasmanian Budget 06-07 STRONG ECONOMY. STRONG COMMUNITIES. Infrastructure fact sheet Building better Delivering our commitments infrastructure The 2006-07 Budget delivers on the Labor Government’s commitment to continue to Infrastructure is vital to building strong improve Tasmania’s infrastructure for the long-term benefit of the Tasmanian community. communities. It forms the foundation on Initiative Benefit which government services are provided $332 million for the development and Continue to improve community safety and on which the economy can grow. maintenance of Tasmania’s vital roads and amenity while also providing the The Labor Government has always over the next 4 years including: basis for continued economic development recognised the importance of infrastructure • $10 million for the Brooker Highway • $14 million for the Lyell Highway and has developed and implemented long- • $10.2 million for Sisters Hill term strategic plans to ensure its optimal • $8.7 million for the South Arm Rd development. • $8.3 million for the East Tamar Highway and southern approaches to Launceston The Government’s plan for energy • $4.8 million to commence work on main infrastructure has resulted in a complete access routes to the Central Highlands restructuring of the state’s energy industry. • $2.5 million for Sorell traffic management • $3.1 million for the Illawarra Main Rd Over half a billion dollars has been spent • $2 million Blackspot funding and $1 million on Tasmania’s road and bridge network for line marking since 1998. $4.4 million for jetties including Improve facilities for boat users in Tasmania Major health, housing, education, sporting Opossum Bay, Swansea, Battery Point where we have one of the highest rates and St Helens of boat ownership per capita and communication infrastructure projects are currently under way.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation Under the Roads and Jetties Act 1935
    TASMANIA __________ PROCLAMATION UNDER THE ROADS AND JETTIES ACT 1935 STATUTORY RULES 2018, No. 91 __________ I, the Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, by this my proclamation made under section 7 of the Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – (a) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 1 to this proclamation to be State highways for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (b) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 2 to this proclamation to be a single subsidiary road, classified as a main road, for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (c) amend the proclamation notified in the Gazette as Statutory Rules 1970, No.67 as follows: (i) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Brooker Highway and substituting the following item: Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No. 91 Brooker Highway From the intersection with the 11.48 Tasman Highway to the Midland Highway at, and (18.48 including, the intersection with kilometres) the Lyell Highway, Granton (ii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Southern Outlet Highway and substituting the following item: Southern Outlet From the intersection with the 5.95 Highway southern boundary of the Davey/Macquarie Couplet, (9.582 South Hobart to and including kilometres) the Kingston Interchange (iii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Tasman Highway and substituting the following item: 2 Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No.
    [Show full text]
  • K Mr 2016 TASCD
    MAGISTRATES COURT of TASMANIA CORONIAL DIVISION Record of Investigation into Death (Without Inquest) Coroners Act 1995 Coroners Rules 2006 Rule 11 (These findings have been de-identified in relation to the name of the deceased, family, friends and others by direction of the Coroner pursuant to S.57(1)(c) of the Coroners Act 1995) I, Simon Cooper, Coroner, having investigated the death of Mr K Find That: (a) The identity of the deceased is Mr K; (b) Mr K died in the circumstances described in this finding; (c) Mr K died as a result of multiple blunt traumatic injuries sustained in a motorcycle crash; (d) Mr K died in June 2015 at Brooker Highway in southern Tasmania; and (e) Mr K was 18 years of age at the time of his death; he was single and a student. Background: Mr K was born in Tasmania in 1997. At the time of his death he was a single man with neither dependants nor a partner. During the working week he lived in a unit in southern Tasmania. Most weekends he returned to his parents’ residence. He was a student at the time of his death attending two separate colleges. His mother says that when he was growing up he was a healthy child. A teacher at one of the colleges he attended described him as respectful with a gentle sense of humour. At the time of his death Mr K was the holder of a Tasmanian L1 novice driver licence. He had made two unsuccessful attempts to obtain his P1 car licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Congestion in Greater Hobart
    Congestion in Greater Hobart Summary report July 2011 Department of Infrastructure, 1 Energy and Resources CONTENTS 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 What influences congestion ............................................................................................. 3 3 Measuring congestion ...................................................................................................... 3 4 Community responses to congestion ............................................................................... 4 4.1 Major infrastructure responses ................................................................................. 4 4.2 One way streets ........................................................................................................ 5 5 DIER’s approach to managing congestion ...................................................................... 5 5.1 What is DIER doing? ................................................................................................ 5 2 1 SUMMARY • The Department of Infrastructure Energy and Resources (DIER) has developed a report on congestion in Greater Hobart which outlines the influences of congestion and the approach DIER is undertaking to manage congestion. • DIER recognises that there is community concern regarding congestion on key urban roads in Greater Hobart and that appropriate measures need to be put in place to manage traffic growth and delays. • DIER’s strategic planning
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Hobart Transport Data
    Background Paper 3: Greater Hobart Transportation Document title 1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Transport Corridors ............................................................................................................................... 2 Major Corridors ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Northern Corridor .............................................................................................................................. 3 Eastern Corridor ................................................................................................................................ 3 Southern Corridor .............................................................................................................................. 3 Congestion ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Hobart Traffic Origin-Destination Report 2017 ...................................................................................... 6 Morning Peak Destinations (7:30am to 9:30am) ................................................................................ 6 Afternoon Peak Origins (4:30pm to 6:30pm) ...................................................................................... 6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Budget Estimates 2008-2009 — (February 2009
    Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Additional Budget Estimates February 2009 Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Question No.: NBII 01 Division: Nation Building – Infrastructure Investment Topic: Maintenance Funding for Tasman and Brooker Highways Hansard Page: 25 (24/02/09) Senator Bushby asked: Senator BUSHBY—During the campaign prior to the last election, the then opposition undertook to extend Tasmania’s national network to include the Brooker Highway from Granton to the Port of Hobart and the Tasman Highway from Hobart to the Hobart airport. Has this been achieved yet? Mr Rokvic—The government has formalised the arrangements to extend the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Does that mean that you have taken over control and responsibility? Mr Rokvic—That enables the state to utilise maintenance funding in relation to maintenance on the highway. Senator BUSHBY—Those sections of those two highways now have the same status as other national roads? Mr Rokvic—Correct, Senator. Senator BUSHBY—What date did that take effect? Ms McNally—That was in February 2009. Mr Rokvic—Early February 2009. Senator BUSHBY—Just very recently. Mr Rokvic—Correct. Senator BUSHBY—Has the Department revised any of its estimates for costings as a result of the responsibility for taking over those two sections? Mr Rokvic—The maintenance funding that has been provided provides for the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Has it increased as a result of taking on those two? Mr Rokvic—The funding is as committed by the government. It was $31 million for maintenance funding plus the additional $1 million provided as part of the nation building.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speleo Spiel
    Who To Blame... President: Bob Cockerill The Speleo Spiel [email protected] .au Newsletter of the Ph: (03) 62 441836 (h) Southern Tasmanian Caverneers Incorporated PO Box 416, Sandy Bay, Tas 7006 Vice President: http://www.tased.edu.au/tasonline/scaving/ Steve Bunton The views expressed in the Speleo Spiel are not Ph: (03) 62 782398 (h) necessarily the views of the Editor, or of the Email: sbunton@postoffice. Southern Tasmanian friends.tas.edu.au Caverneers Incorporated. Secretary: Issue No. 309, Jul-Aug 1998 Liz Canning Ph: (03) 62 242035 (h) Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Treasurer: Editorial 2 Arthur Clarke Ph: (03) 62 282099 (h) Club Matters 2 Email: arthurc@ southcom.com.au Forward Program 2 Equipment Officer: Trip Reports/Articles 3 Jeff Butt Ph (03) 62 238620 (h) Midnight Hole-La Technique Cordelette-5/7/98 3 Email: jeffbutt@ Building New Fixed Ladders for Growling Swallet-8/7/98 3 netspace.net.au Flick Mint’s Hole (JF371)-three strikes and you’re out! 4 S & R officer: HIDDEN ASPECTS: Cave Art drawings by June Jeff Butt Ph (03) 62 238620 (h) MacLucas - Burnie Art Gallery. 5 Email: jeffbutt@ Prospecting a new slot (JF-x???) near Flick Mint’s Hole. 6 netspace.net.au Analysis of an Incident (17/7/98) in Flick Mint’s Hole (JF371) 7 Public officer: Some observations of Caving around the World-Part 1, Steve Bunton the USA. 11 Ph: (03) 62 782398 (h) Servelane-Growling Swallet (JF36)-19/7/98 12 Email: sbunton@ postoffice.friends.tas.edu.au Draining: A trip through history in the Hobart Rivulet-22/7/98 13 The GPS 1024 week Roll-over (& Y2K) 15 Spiel Editor: Jeff Butt STC Warehouse Sales 16 Web Site: Proxy and Nomination form for the Annual General Meeting 16 http://www.tased.edu.au/ tasonline/scaving/ Cover Photo: “Jim” in the streamway in Welcome Stranger (JF229).
    [Show full text]
  • About RACT Have Your Say: “The RACT Stands Ready to Work with the Government on Identifying the Most Appropriate Spending Prio
    “The RACT stands ready to work with the government on identifying the most appropriate spending priorities ...” Harvey Lennon RACT CEO About RACT Have your say: The RACT enjoys a trusted position and extensive market penetration in the community with more than Phone: 13 27 22 190,000 Tasmanians as members. Email: [email protected] The RACT employs between 420-500 Tasmanians (subject to seasonal requirements) in its core functions of roadside assist, hotel and accommodation services, insurance, travel and its statewide retail network. Social: #KeepTasmaniaMoving It is the largest and strongest member organisation in Tasmania. Formed in 1923, the RACT is an apolitical Member Hub: hub.ract.com.au and independent transport infrastructure, road safety, tourism and mobility advocate. It is committed to supporting and furthering the interests of Tasmanians and does this through a comprehensive program of consultation, education, awareness and public advocacy. TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2018 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Road Funding Priorities 2018 2018 Bass Highway 10 Year Plan State Funding State Funding onwards onwards 1 Christmas Hills Greater Hobart Traffic Vision $30.8M Exeter and Batman highway overtaking 2 Parramatta Creek Inner Hobart improvements, incident response & feasibility Batman Highway widening studies 3 Upgraded Wynyard intersections Motor Road improvement Launceston Traffic Vision $35.1M 4 Wynyard to Marrawah South East Traffic $21M Invermay, Batman Highway, Launceston Couplet, Goderich/ Greater Hobart
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report No.8 Regional Transport System
    Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy Background Report No.8: The Regional Transport System September 2010 This document is detailed supporting information for the Regional Land Use Strategy for Southern Tasmania. While every responsible effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of Tasmania, the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, the 12 Southern Councils and the Sullivans Cove Waterfront Authority, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Please visit www.stca.tas.gov.au or telephone the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority on 61 3 6270 2242 with any queries. Acknowledgements This background report has been produced with the assistance of the Department of Infrastructure Energy & Resource. Information in this report is strongly derived from the work associated with the Southern Integrated Transport Plan (a joint initiative of the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority and the Department of Infrastructure, Energy & Resources). This report is intended to provide an overview of the aspects of the regional transport system that are relevant to the preparation of a regional land use Strategy only. More detailed information on the regional transport system can be obtained from the Southern Region Background Report (November 2006). Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Transport Planning Responsibilities 1 1.3 The Region’s Transport System 2 1.4 Strategic Planning and Analysis 8 2. Development of the Region’s Transport System 9 3.
    [Show full text]