DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1102.4624V1 [Hep-Th] 22 Feb 2011 (Sec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1102.4624V1 [Hep-Th] 22 Feb 2011 (Sec Renormalisation group and the Planck scale Daniel F. Litim∗ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, U.K. I discuss the renormalisation group approach to gravity, its link to S. Weinberg's asymptotic safety scenario, and give an overview of results with applications to particle physics and cosmology. I. INTRODUCTION Einstein's theory of general relativity is the remarkably successful classical theory of the gravitational force, charac- −11 3 2 terised by Newton's coupling constant GN = 6:67×10 m =(kg s ) and a small cosmological constant Λ. Experimen- tally, its validity has been confirmed over many orders of magnitude in length scales ranging from the sub-millimeter regime up to solar system size. At larger length scales, the standard model of cosmology including dark matter and dark energy components fits the data well. At shorter length scales, quantum effects are expected to become impor- tant. An order of magnitude estimate for the quantum scale of gravity { the Planck scale { is obtained by dimensional p 3 −33 analysis leading to the Planck length `Pl ≈ ~GN =c of the order of 10 cm, with c the speed of light. In particle physics units this translates into the Planck mass 19 MPl ≈ 10 GeV : (1) While this energy scale is presently out of reach for earth-based particle accelerator experiments, fingerprints of Planck-scale physics can nevertheless become accessible through cosmological data from the very early universe. From a theory perspective, it is widely expected that a fundamental understanding of Planck scale physics requires a quantum theory of gravity. It is well known that the standard perturbative quantisation programme faces problems, and a fully satisfactory quantum theory, even outside the framework of local quantum physics, is presently not at hand. In the past 15 years, however, a significant body of work has been devoted to re-evaluate the physics of the Planck scale within conventional settings. Much of this renewed interest is fueled by Steven Weinberg's seminal proposal, more than 30 years of age, that a quantum theory of gravitation may dynamically evade the virulent divergences encountered in standard perturbation theory [1]. This scenario, known as asymptotic safety, implies that gravity achieves a non-trivial ultraviolet (UV) fixed point under its renormalisation group flow. If so, this would incorporate gravity alongside the set of well-understood quantum field theories whose UV behaviour is governed by a fixed point, eg. Yang-Mills theory. In this note, I discuss the renormalisation group approach to gravity. I recall some of the issues of perturbative quantum gravity (Sec. II), introduce the renormalisation group `ala Wilson to access the physics at the Planck scale (Sec. III), review key results in four dimensions (Sec. IV), evaluate applications within low-scale quantum gravity arXiv:1102.4624v1 [hep-th] 22 Feb 2011 (Sec. V), and conclude (Sec. VI). II. PERTURBATIVE QUANTUM GRAVITY A vast body of work has been devoted to the perturbative quantisation programme of gravity. I recall a very small selection of these in order to prepare for the subsequent discussion, and I use particle physics units ~ = c = kB = 1 throughout. Classical general relativity is described by the classical action Z 1 4 p S = d x det gµν (−R(gµν ) + 2Λ) (2) 16π GN where I have chosen a euclidean signature, R denotes the Ricci scalar, and Λ the cosmological constant term. The main point to be stressed is that the fundamental coupling of gravity GN in (2) carries a dimension which sets a ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 2 mass scale, with mass dimension [GN ] = 2 − d in d dimensional space-time. This structure distinguishes gravity in a profound manner from the other fundamentally known interactions in Nature, all of which have dimensionless coupling constants from the outset. Consequently, the effective dimensionless coupling of gravity which organises its perturbative expansion is given by 2 geff ≡ GN E (3) (in four dimensions), where E denotes the relevant energy scale. While the effective coupling (3) remains small for energies below the Planck scale E MPl, it grows large in the Planckian regime where an expansion in geff may become questionable. Within the Feynman diagrammatic approach, this behaviour translates into the (with loop order) increasing degree of divergence of perturbative diagrams involving gravitons [1]. This structure is different from standard quantum field theories and relates to the classification of interactions as super-renormalisable, renormalisable, or `dangerous', depending on whether their canonical mass dimension is positive, vanishing, or negative. The degree of divergences implied by the negative mass dimension of Newton's coupling is mirrored in the perturbative non- renormalisability of Einstein gravity which has been established at the one-loop level [2] in the presence of matter fields, and at the two-loop level [3] within pure gravity. While this state of play looks discouraging from a field theory perspective, it does not rule out a quantum-field theoretical description of gravity altogether. There are a few indicators available to support this view. Firstly, at low energies, a weak-coupling analysis of quantum gravity effects is possible within an effective theory approach [4], which operates an ultraviolet cutoff at the Planck scale, see [5] for a review. Secondly, higher order derivative operators appear to stabilise perturbation theory [6]. Including all fourth order derivative operators it has been proven by K. Stelle that gravity is renormalisable to all orders in perturbation theory [7]. This striking difference with Einstein- Hilbert gravity highlights the stabilising effect of higher derivative terms. Unfortunately, the resulting theory is not compatible with standard notions of perturbative unitarity and has therefore not been considered as a candidate for a fundamental theory of gravity. The r^oleof higher order derivative operators has further been clarified in [8] with the help of a BRST analysis. Interestingly, the theory remains unitary once all higher derivative operators are retained, whereas renormalisability is at best achieved in a very weak sense due to the required infinitely many counter terms. III. RENORMALISATION GROUP The renormalisation group (RG) comes into play when the running of couplings with energy is taken into account. As in any generic quantum field theory, quantum fluctuations modify the strength of couplings. If the metric field remains the fundamental carrier of the gravitational force, the fluctuations of space-time itself should modify the gravitational interactions with energy or distance. For Newton's coupling, this implies that GN becomes a running −1 coupling GN ! G(k) = GN Z (k) as a function of the RG momentum scale k, where Z(k) denotes the wave-function renormalisation factor of the graviton. Consequently, the dimensionless coupling geff in (3) should be replaced by the running coupling g = G(k) k2 (4) which evolves with the RG scale. In particular, the UV behaviour of standard perturbation theory is significantly improved, provided that (4) remains finite in the high-energy limit. This is the asymptotic safety scenario as advocated by S. Weinberg [1], see [6, 9] for extensive accounts of the scenario and [10{12] for brief overviews. The intimate link between a fundamental definition of quantum field theory and renormalisation group fixed points has been stressed by K. Wilson some 40 years ago [13, 14]. For gravity, the fixed point property becomes visible by considering the Callan-Symanzik-type RG equation for (4) which in d dimensions takes the form [10] (see also [6, 9]) @tg ≡ βg = (d − 2 + η) g (5) with η = −@t ln Z(k) the graviton anomalous dimension which in general is a function of all couplings of the theory including matter, and t = ln k. This simple structure arises provided the underlying effective action is local in the metric field. From the RG equation (5) one concludes that the gravitational coupling may display two types of fixed points. The non-interacting (Gaussian) fixed point corresponds to g∗ = 0 and entails the vanishing of the anomalous 3 dimension η = 0. In its vicinity, gravity stays classical, and G(k) ≈ GN . On the other hand, a non-trivial RG fixed point with g∗ 6= 0 can be achieved implicitly, provided that the anomalous dimension reads η∗ = 2 − d : (6) The signficance of (6) is that the graviton anomalous dimension precisely counter-balances the canonical dimension of Newton's coupling GN . This pattern is known from other gauge systems at a critical point away from their canonical space-time dimensionality [10], eg. U(1) Higgs theory in three dimensions [15]. In consequence, the dimensionful, d−2 renormalised coupling scales as G(k) ≈ g∗=k and becomes small in the ultraviolet limit where 1=k ! 0. This pattern is at the root for the non-perturbative renormalisability of quantum gravity within a fixed point scenario. Much work has been devoted to check by explicit computation whether or not the gravitational couplings achieve a non-trivial UV fixed point. A versatile framework to address this question is provided by modern (functional) renormalisation group methods, based on the infinitesimal integrating-out of momentum degrees of freedom from a path integral representation of the theory `ala Wilson [16{20]. This is achieved by adding a momentum cutoff to the action, quadratic in the propagating fields. In consequence, the action (2) becomes a scale-dependent effective or flowing action Γk, Z d p 1 Γk = d x g (−R(gµν ) + 2Λk) + ··· + Sk;gf + Sk;gh + Sk;matter ; (7) 16πGk which in the context of gravity contains a running gravitational coupling, a running cosmological constant Λk, a gauge fixing term, ghost contributions, matter interactions, and the dots indicate possible higher derivative operators in the metric field. Upon varying the RG scale k, the effective action interpolates between a microscopic theory ΓΛ at the UV scale k = Λ (not to be confused with the running cosmological constant Λk) and the macroscopic quantum effective action Γ where all fluctuations are taken into account (k ! 0).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultraviolet Fixed Point Structure of Renormalizable Four-Fermion Theory in Less Than Four Dimensions*
    160 Ultraviolet Fixed Point Structure of Renormalizable Four-Fermion Theory in Less Than Four Dimensions* Yoshio Kikukawa Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-01,Japan Abstract We study the renormalization properties of the four-fermion theory in less than four dimen­ sions (D < 4) in 1/N expansion scheme. It is shown that /3 function of the bare coupling has a nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point with a large anomalous dimension ( 'Yti;.p = D - 2) in a similar manner to QED and gauged Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model in ladder approximation. The anomalous dimension has no discontinuity across the fixed point in sharp contrast to gauged NJL model. The operator product expansion of the fermion mass function is also given. Introduction Recently the possibility that QED may have a nontrivial ultraviolet(UV) fixed point has been paid much attention from the viewpoints of "zero charge" problem in QED and raising condensate in technicolor model. Actually such a possibility was pointed out in ladder approximation in which the cutoff Schwinger-Dyson equation for the fermion self-energy possesses a spontaneous-chiral­ symmetry-breaking solution for the bare coupling larger than a non-zero value ( ao =eij/ 411" > ?r/3 = ac)- We can make this solution finite by letting ao have a cutoff dependence in such a way that ao( I\) _,. ac + 0 (I\ - oo ), ac being identified as the critical point with scaling behavior of essential-singularity type. At the critical point, fermion mass operator ;j;'lj; has a large anomalous dimension 'Yti;.p = 1,
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Problem with Perturbative Quantum Field Theory
    The Real Problem with Perturbative Quantum Field Theory James Duncan Fraser Abstract The perturbative approach to quantum field theory (QFT) has long been viewed with suspicion by philosophers of science. This paper offers a diag- nosis of its conceptual problems. Drawing on Norton's ([2012]) discussion of the notion of approximation I argue that perturbative QFT ought to be understood as producing approximations without specifying an underlying QFT model. This analysis leads to a reassessment of common worries about perturbative QFT. What ends up being the key issue with the approach on this picture is not mathematical rigour, or the threat of inconsistency, but the need for a physical explanation of its empirical success. 1 Three Worries about Perturbative Quantum Field Theory 2 The Perturbative Formalism 2.1 Expanding the S-matrix 2.2 Perturbative renormalization 3 Approximations and Models 4 Perturbative Quantum Field Theory Produces Approximations 5 The Real Problem 1 Three Worries about Perturbative Quantum Field Theory On the face of it, the perturbative approach to quantum field theory (QFT) ought to be of great interest to philosophers of physics.1 Perturbation theory has long 1I use the terms `perturbative approach to QFT' and `perturbative QFT' here to refer to the perturbative treatment of interacting field theories that is invariable found in QFT textbooks and forms the basis of much work in high energy physics. I am not assuming that this `approach' 1 played a special role in the QFT programme. The axiomatic and effective field theory approaches to QFT, which have been the locus of much philosophical at- tention in recent years, have their roots in the perturbative formalism pioneered by Feynman, Schwinger and Tomonaga in the 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Models for New Physics on the Lattice
    Exploring Models for New Physics on the Lattice Ethan T. Neil∗ Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory E-mail: [email protected] Strongly-coupled gauge theories are an important ingredient in the construction of many exten- sions of the standard model, particularly for models of electroweak symmetry breaking in which the Higgs boson is a composite object. There is a large parameter space of such gauge theories with a rich phase structure, particularly in the presence of large numbers of fermionic degrees of freedom. Lattice simulation provides a non-perturbative way to explore this space of strongly- coupled theories, and to search for interesting dynamical features. Here I review recent progress in the simulation of such theories, with an eye towards applications to dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking. XXIX International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory July 10-16, 2011 Squaw Valley, Lake Tahoe, California ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Exploring Models for New Physics on the Lattice Ethan T. Neil 1. Introduction Lattice gauge theory has enjoyed considerable success as a non-perturbative method to study and understand quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the only example of a strongly coupled gauge theory observed in nature thus far. With modern computers and computational techniques, lattice QCD is attaining high levels of precision, with simulation parameters approaching the physical point. However, the success enjoyed by lattice QCD is no reason for us to restrict the attention of our lattice studies to that theory alone. QCD is far from unique as an example of an asymptotically free Yang-Mills gauge theory, inhabiting a large space of models, all of which are well-suited to numerical study on the lattice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for the Universality Class of Metric Quantum Gravity
    universe Article The Search for the Universality Class of Metric Quantum Gravity Riccardo Martini 1 , Alessandro Ugolotti 2 and Omar Zanusso 3,* 1 Okinawa Institute of Science, Technology Graduate University, Kunigami District, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan; [email protected] 2 Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, 07743 Jena, Germany; [email protected] 3 Università di Pisa and INFN—Sezione di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: On the basis of a limited number of reasonable axioms, we discuss the classification of all the possible universality classes of diffeomorphisms invariant metric theories of quantum gravity. We use the language of the renormalization group and adopt several ideas which originate in the context of statistical mechanics and quantum field theory. Our discussion leads to several ideas that could affect the status of the asymptotic safety conjecture of quantum gravity and give universal arguments towards its proof. Keywords: quantum gravity; asymptotic safety 1. Introduction Citation: Martini, R.; Ugolotti, A.; A well-known fact is that in four dimensions a quantum theory of Einstein–Hilbert Zanusso, O. The Search for the gravity displays perturbatively non-renormalizable divergences starting at two loops [1,2]. Universality Class of Metric This happens because Newton’s constant has negative mass dimension, which in turn Quantum Gravity. Universe 2021, 7, requires a re-interpretation of the perturbative series as an effective expansion in inverse 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ powers of the Planck mass, making the theory an effective IR model, rather than a UV universe7060162 complete one [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 Annual Report 2018 Annual Report 2018 Helsinki Institute of Physics
    Helsinki office CERN office P.O. Box 64 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2) CERN/PH FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland tel. +358-2-941 50557 tel. +41-22-76 73027 Annual Report 2018 www.hip.fi Annual Report 2018 Annual Report 2018 Helsinki Institute of Physics Vice-Rector Sari Lindblom unveiling the portrait of the former HIP Director, Vice-Rector Paula Eerola. Annual Report 2018 Helsinki Institute of Physics CONTENTS 1. Preface 4 2. Highlights of Research Results 6 3. Theory Programme 10 4. CMS Programme 16 5. Nuclear Matter Programme 22 6. Technology Programme 26 7. Detector Laboratory 32 8. CLOUD 34 9. Planck-Euclid 36 10. Education and Open Data 38 11. Joint Activities 39 12. Organization and Personnel 40 13. Seminars 43 14. Visitors 44 15. Conference participation, Talks and Visits by Personnel 45 16. Publications 53 17. Preprints 66 Annual Report 2018 Helsinki Institute of Physics, Preface PREFACE The Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP) is a joint research institute of the Universities of Helsinki and Jyväskylä, Aalto University, Tampere University of Technology, and Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT. The Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority is an interim member of HIP for 2018–2019. The University of Helsinki is the host organisation of HIP. HIP addresses fundamental science questions from quarks to the Cosmos as well as technologies from semiconductors to medical applications and climate research. The Institute serves as a national institute for Finnish physics and related technology research and development at international accelerator laboratories. By mandate of the Finnish Ministry of KATRI HUITU Education and Culture, HIP is responsible for the Finnish research collaboration Helsinki Institute of Physics director with the European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN and the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research FAIR GmbH, which is under construction at the GSI Accelerator Laboratory in Darmstadt.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite Higgs Bosons from Neutrino Condensates in an Inverted Seesaw Scenario
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 075009 (2020) Composite Higgs bosons from neutrino condensates in an inverted seesaw scenario † ‡ Leonardo Coito,* Carlos Faubel, and Arcadi Santamaria Departament de Física Teòrica, Universitat de Val`encia and IFIC, Universitat de Val`encia-CSIC, Doctor Moliner 50, E-46100 Burjassot (Val`encia), Spain (Received 8 January 2020; accepted 11 March 2020; published 7 April 2020) We present a realization of the idea that the Higgs boson is mainly a bound state of neutrinos induced by strong four-fermion interactions. The conflicts of this idea with the measured values of the top quark and Higgs boson masses are overcome by introducing, in addition to the right-handed neutrino, a new fermion singlet, which, at low energies, implements the inverse seesaw mechanism. The singlet fermions also develop a scalar bound state that mixes with the Higgs boson. This allows us to obtain a small Higgs boson mass even if the couplings are large, as required in composite scalar scenarios. The model gives the correct masses for the top quark and Higgs boson for compositeness scales below the Planck scale and masses of the new particles above the electroweak scale, so that we obtain naturally a low-scale seesaw scenario for neutrino masses. The theory contains additional scalar particles coupled to the neutral fermions, which could be tested in present and near future experiments. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075009 I. INTRODUCTION are included). Since then, many authors have tried to generalize the mechanism to give predictions in In 1989 Bardeen et al. [1] (BHL) put forward the agreement with experiment (for a review see, for idea that the Higgs boson could be a bound state of instance, [14,15]).
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Higgs Boson Composed of Neutrinos?
    Is the Higgs Boson Composed of Neutrinos? Jens Krog1, ∗ and Christopher T. Hill2, y 1CP3-Origins, University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark 2Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA (Dated: January 16, 2020) We show that conventional Higgs compositeness conditions can be achieved by the running of large Higgs-Yukawa couplings involving right-handed neutrinos that become active at ∼ 1013 − 1014 GeV. Together with a somewhat enhanced quartic coupling, arising by a Higgs portal interaction to a dark matter sector, we can obtain a Higgs boson composed of neutrinos. This is a "next-to-minimal" dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking scheme. PACS numbers: 14.80.Bn,14.80.-j,14.80.Da I. INTRODUCTION treatment indicates that a tt composite Higgs boson re- quires (i) a Landau pole at scale Λ in the running top HY Many years ago it was proposed that the top quark coupling constant, yt(µ), (ii) the Higgs-quartic coupling λH must also have a Landau pole, and (iii) compositeness Higgs-Yukawa (HY) coupling, yt, might be large and 4 conditions must be met, such as λH (µ)=gt (µ) ! 0 and governed by a quasi-infrared-fixed point behavior of the 2 renormalization group [1, 2]. This implied, using the min- λH (µ)=gt (µ) !(constant) as µ ! Λ, [5]. This predicts a imal ingredients of the Standard Model, a top quark mass Higgs boson mass of order ∼ 250 GeV with a heavy top quark of order ∼ 220 GeV, predictions that come within of order 220−240 GeV for the case of a Landau pole in yt at a scale, Λ, of order the GUT to Planck scale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Infrared Fixed Point of the Top Quark Mass and Its Implications Within the MSSM∗
    CERN-TH.7320/94 The Infrared Fixed Point of the Top Quark Mass and its Implications within the MSSM∗ M. Carena and C.E.M. Wagner Theory Division, CERN, CH 1211, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract We analyse the general features of the Higgs and supersymmetric particle spectrum associated with the infrared fixed point solution of the top quark mass in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. We consider the constraints on the mass parameters, which are derived from the condition of a proper radiative electroweak symmetry break- ing in the low and moderate tan β regime. In the case of universal soft supersymmetry breaking parameters at the high energy scale, the radiative SU(2)L U(1)Y breaking, together with the top quark Yukawa fixed point structure imply that,× for any given value of the top quark mass, the Higgs and supersymmetric particle spectrum is fully determined as a function of only two supersymmetry breaking parameters. This result is of great interest since the infrared fixed point solution appears as a prediction in many different theoretical frameworks. In particular, in the context of the MSSM with unification of the gauge and bottom{tau Yukawa couplings, for small and moderate values of tan β the value of the top quark mass is very close to its infrared fixed point value. We show that, for the interesting range of top quark mass values Mt 175 10 GeV, both a light chargino and a light stop may be present in the spectrum.' In± ad- dition, for a given top quark mass, the infrared fixed point solution of the top quark Yukawa coupling minimizes the value of the lightest CP-even Higgs mass mh.The resulting upper bounds on mh read mh 90 (105) (120) GeV for Mt 165 (175) (185) GeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(LATTICE 2008)057 the Theory Changes Fro Confining to F N 8 and 12
    The Conformal Window in SU(3) Yang-Mills PoS(LATTICE 2008)057 Ethan T. Neil∗ Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States E-mail: [email protected] Thomas Appelquist Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States E-mail: [email protected] George T. Fleming Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States E-mail: [email protected] Yang-Mills theory is known to exhibit very different behavior as the number of light fermion flavors Nf is varied. In particular, for sufficiently large Nf the theory changes fro confining to conformal behavior in the infrared. We have obtained results for SU(3) Yang-Mills, based on the study of the running coupling through the Schrödinger Functional approach, that the transition between these two phases occurs between 8 and 12 flavors. I will present the details of our staggered fermion simulations at Nf = 8 and 12. The XXVI International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory July 14 - 19, 2008 Williamsburg, Virginia, USA ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ The Conformal Window in SU(3) Yang-Mills Ethan T. Neil 1. Introduction With the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) about to come online, the bulk of particle theory re- search is focused on extending the Standard Model to the TeV-scale energies which will soon become experimentally accessible. A number of the theoretical models considered to describe LHC physics involve new strong dynamics, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1707.04217V2 [Hep-Th] 28 Mar 2018
    More asymptotic safety guaranteed Andrew D. Bond1, ∗ and Daniel F. Litim1, y 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, U Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, U.K. We study interacting fixed points and phase diagrams of simple and semi-simple quantum field theories in four dimensions involving non-abelian gauge fields, fermions and scalars in the Veneziano limit. Particular emphasis is put on new phenomena which arise due to the semi- simple nature of the theory. Using matter field multiplicities as free parameters, we find a large variety of interacting conformal fixed points with stable vacua and crossovers inbetween. Highlights include semi-simple gauge theories with exact asymptotic safety, theories with one or several interacting fixed points in the IR, theories where one of the gauge sectors is both UV free and IR free, and theories with weakly interacting fixed points in the UV and the IR limits. The phase diagrams for various simple and semi-simple settings are also given. Further aspects such as perturbativity beyond the Veneziano limit, conformal windows, and implications for model building are discussed. arXiv:1707.04217v2 [hep-th] 28 Mar 2018 ∗ [email protected] y [email protected] 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Fixed points of gauge theories 4 A. Fixed points in perturbation theory 4 B. Gauge couplings 6 C. Yukawa couplings 7 D. Scalar couplings 8 E. Universal scaling exponents 9 III. Minimal models 11 A. Semi-simple gauge theory 11 B. Free parameters and Veneziano limit 13 C. Perturbativity to leading order 14 D. Anomalous dimensions 16 E. Running couplings beyond the leading order 17 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 and Dark Matter Confront Asymptotic Safety
    Minimal models for g − 2 and dark matter confront asymptotic safety Kamila Kowalska∗ and Enrico Maria Sessolo† National Centre for Nuclear Research Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Abstract We use the framework of asymptotic safety above the Planck scale to constrain the parameter space of simple models of new physics that can accommodate the measured value of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon and the relic density of dark matter. We couple parametrically to the trans-Planckian quantum physics a set of SU(2)L×U(1)Y invariant extensions of the Standard Model, each comprising an inert scalar field and one pair of colorless fermions that communicate to the muons through Yukawa-type interactions. The presence of an interactive UV fixed point in the system of gauge and Yukawa couplings imposes a set of boundary conditions at the Planck scale, which allow one to derive unique phenomenological predictions in each case and distinguish the different representations of the gauge group from one another. We apply to the models constraints from the h ! µµ signal strength at ATLAS and CMS, direct LHC searches for electroweak production with leptons and missing energy in the final state, and the dark matter relic density. We find that they further restrict the available parameter space. arXiv:2012.15200v2 [hep-ph] 27 May 2021 ∗[email protected] †[email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Minimal models for the lepton g − 24 2.1 Lagrangian of the models . .7 2.2 Dark matter . 10 3 Trans-Planckian fixed points 11 3.1 General notions .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Annual Report 2017 Annual Report 2017 Helsinki Institute of Physics 2 3 The FAIR Groundbreaking event on July 4th, 2017. HIP Director, Professor Paula Eerola on the left. (Courtesy of G. Otto for FAIR/GSI.) Annual Report 2017 Helsinki Institute of Physics Annual Report 2017 Helsinki Institute of Physics Contents 2 3 1. Preface 4 2. Highlights of Research Results 6 3. Theory Programme 9 4. CMS Programme 15 5. Nuclear Matter Programme 20 6. Technology Programme 25 7. Detector Laboratory 30 8. CLOUD 32 9. Planck-Euclid 34 10. Education and Open Data 35 11. Joint Activities 36 12. Organization and Personnel 37 13. Seminars 39 14. Visitors 40 15. Conference participation, Talks and Visits by Personnel 41 16. Publications 48 17. Preprints 58 Annual Report 2017 Helsinki Institute of Physics, Preface Preface Paula Eerola Research at the Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP) addresses fundamental science questions from quarks to the Cosmos, as well as technologies from semiconductors to accelerators, medical applications, and climate research. HIP is operated by the University of Helsinki, Aalto University, the University of Jyväskylä, Lappeenranta University of Technology and Tampere University of Technology. The Institute has, since 1997, had a national mandate from the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture to co-ordinate the collaboration between CERN and Finland. HIP is also responsible for co-ordination of the Finnish activities at the planned international Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) 4 in Darmstadt, Germany. The research activities of HIP in 2017 consisted of four main research programmes: the Theory Programme; the CMS Programme including the CMS and TOTEM experiments; the Nuclear Matter Programme including involvements in the ALICE experiment, ISOLDE, and the FAIR facility; and the Technology Programme, with five applied research projects.
    [Show full text]