DOCSLIB.ORG

Drug Trafficking

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drug Trafficking If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. NATIONAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT POLICY BOARD Federal Drug Enforcement Progress Report 1984 - 1985 March 1986 PREFACE This report is submitted to Congress pursuant to the National Narcotics Act of 1984. As Chairman of the National Drug Enforcement Policy Board, the Attorney General is required to submit biannual reports to Congress. On July 9, 1985, the Policy Board forwarded its first report, which described the Board's law enforcement policies and strategies. Beginning with this second report, the Board must give to Congress "a full and complete report reflecting accomplishments ...." Even though the Policy Board was not created until the middle of fiscal year 1985, this report describes accomplishments in drug enforcement during fiscal years 1984 and 1985. Although this report focuses primarily on law enforcement efforts to reduce the supply of drugs in the United States, the Policy Board recognizes the importance of efforts to reduce the demand for drugs. A major section of this report describes the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Program. Annual reports of the OCDETF Program were prepared for calendar years 1983 and 1984. The Policy Board has decided to consolidate reporting on 1985 OCDETF accomplishments within this report. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..................................................... i List of Tables and Figures .................................. iii Introduction ................................................. I I , The Drug Problem in 1985 .......................... 6 II. Investigation & Prosecution ....................... 12 A. Combined Federal Effort ....................... 13 B. Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program ............................ 43 III. Interdiction ...................................... 120 IV. International Drug Control ........................ 146 V. Domestic Cannabis Eradication ..................... 174 VI. Licit Drug Control ................................ 182 VII. Intelligence Programs ............................. 190 VIII. Legislative Initiatives ........................... 206 IX. Drug Abuse Prevention and Education ............... 218 X. Training .......................................... 223 XI. A Look to the Future .............................. 233 Appendix A: Geographical Drug Enforcement Program Classification System .......................... 240 Appendix B: Controlled Substances Act Drug Schedules ....... 242 ii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables Table I.I. Estimate of Quantities of Drugs Consumed lllicitly in the United States, 1981-1984 Table II.l. - DEA and FBI Electronic Interceptions (Title III) Table II.2. - Drug-Related Asset Seizures and Forfeitures Table II.3. - U.S. Marshals Service Number and Value of Seized Properties Table II.4. - Internal Revenue Service - Criminal Investigation Division Summary of Drug Activities Table II.5. - Jeopardy and Termination Assessments Against Drug Traffickers Table II.6. - FBI Organized Crime Corruption Program Public Corruption Convictions Table II.7. - DEA and State and Local Law Enforcement Agency Clandestine Laboratory Seizures Table II.8. - Drug Enforcement Administration Geographical Drug Enforcement Program Arrests Table II.9. - Drug Enforcement Administration Arrests by Source Table II.10. - Drug Enforcement Administration Convictions Table II.ll. - Drug Enforcement Administration Sentencing Data Table II.12. - Executive Office for United States Attorneys Controlled Substance Statistics Table II.13. - FBI and DEA Domestic Drug Removals Table II.14. - DEA State and Local Task Force Program Arrests and Convictions by Fiscal Year Table 11.15.* - Type of Criminal Organizations Targeted in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 * Tables 11.15. through 11.32. refer to Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force investigations. iii Table 11.16. Drugs Involved in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Table II.17. Type of Criminal Activities Involved in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.18. Investigative Techniques Proposed in Investigations Through December 31, 1985 Table II.19. Law Enforcement Agency Participation in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Table II.20. Drugs Charged In Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.21. Type of Criminal Activities Charged In Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Table II.22. Investigative Techniques Used for Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.23. Law Enforcement Agency Participation in Investigations Resulting in Charges Through December 31, 1985 Table II.24. Defendant's Roles in Targeted Criminal Organizations, Defendants Charged Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.25. Scope of Criminal Organizations Targeted In Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.26. Offenses Charged, Defendants Charged Through December 31, 1985 Table II.27. Disposition By Defendant In Cases Adjudicated Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.28. Convictions By Offense For Charges Disposed of Through December 31, 1985 Table 11.29. Net Prison Terms Imposed On Defendants Sentenced Through December 31, 1985 Table II.30. Assets Seized Through December 31, 1985 Table II.31. Assets Forfeited Through December 31, 1985 iv Table II.32. Fines Assessed Through December 31, 1985 Table III.I. U.S. Customs Service Seizures Made From "Cold Hits" During FY 1985 Table III.2. Customs and Coast Guard Drug Interdiction Effort, Drugs and Conveyances Seized, FY 1981 - FY 1985 Table IV.I. Cannabis Eradication Table IV.2. Coca Eradication Table IV.3. Opium Eradication Table V.I. Domestic Eradication/Suppression Program Statistics Figures Figure I.* Type of Criminal Organizations Targeted In Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 2. Drugs Involved in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 3. Type of Criminal Activities Involved in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 4. Investigative Techniques Proposed In Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 5. Law Enforcement Agency Participation In Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 6. Drugs Charged in Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Figure 7. Type of Criminal Activities Charged in Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 * Figures 1 through 18 refer to Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force investigations. V Figure 8. Investigative Techniques Used for Indictments and Informations Returned Through December 31, 1985 Figure 9. Law Enforcement Agency Participation In Investigations Resulting in Charges Through December 31, 1985 Figure i0. Defendant's Roles in Targeted Criminal Organizations, Defendants Charged Through December 31, 1985 Figure ii. Scope of Criminal Organizations Targeted in Investigations Initiated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 12. Defendants Charged Through December 31, 1985 Figure 13. Disposition by Defendant In Cases Adjudicated Through December 31, 1985 Figure 14. Convictions By Offense For Charges Disposed of Through December 31, 1985 Figure 15. Net Prison Terms Imposed on Defendants Sentenced Through December 31, 1985 Figure 16. Assets Seized Through December 31, 1983 Figure 17. Assets Forfeited Through December 31, 1985 Figure 18. Fines Assessed Through December 31, 1985 vi INTRODUCTION In response to the growing scope and complexity of America's drug problem, the Federal government in recent years has significantly expanded its enforcement efforts to reduce the supply of illegal drugs in our society. Of the approximately $1.7 billion authorized for drug abuse functions in Fiscal Year (FY) 1985, over $1.4 billion was spent on domestic and international supply reduction programs. The number of Drug Enforcement Administration special agents, diversion investigators, intelligence analysts, and chemists has steadily increased since 1982. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been assigned drug enforcement responsibility as one of its primary missions and has directed over 1,000 agents into drug investigations since 1982; the Internal Revenue Service has doubled its commitment to drug enforcement during the last few years; the U.S. Customs Service and the U.S. Coast Guard have made drug interdiction their first law enforcement priority; and the State Department Bureau of International Narcotics Matters has grown steadily. Additionally, formal interagency programs, such as the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force Program and the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System, have been created and expanded. This report documents recent progress made by our domestic and international supply reduction programs in combatting drug trafficking. In its July 1985 Interim Report to Congress, the National Drug Enforcement Policy Board affirmed the President's 1984 National Strategy for Prevention of Drug Abuse and Drug Trafficking, as modified by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The Interim Report stressed four principal drug law enforcement strategies: i. Identify, investigate, prosecute, and incarcerate the members of drug trafficking organizations. Immobilize their criminal enterprises through seizure of their drugs and forfeiture of their drug-derived assets. - i - . Intercept and seize drug contraband en route to or at the borders of the United States. Destroy illegal drugs at their source through eradica-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential Liability of Federal Law-Enforcement Agents Engaged in Undercover Child Pornography Investigations
    NO TES THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF FEDERAL LAW-ENFORCEMENT AGENTS ENGAGED IN UNDERCOVER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY INVESTIGATIONS HOWARD ANGLIN* In the course of enforcing laws against child pornography,law enforcement agents often engage in undercover operations that involve mailing child pornography to suspected consumers. In this Note, Howard Anglin argues that Congress and the Supreme and circuit courts have clearly established that children portrayed in por- nography are harmed every time the pornographicimages are viewed. The current law enforcement practice of mailing child pornography therefore injures children each time it is carried out. Under the doctrine formulated in Bivens v. Six Un- known Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, this injury is actionable by the children involved and may lead to monetary damage awards against the agents who choose to send pornography to criminal suspects. Thus, law enforcement agencies should alter their practices to avoid Bivens liability and adhere to Con- gressional admonitions not to injure the innocent in order to catch the guilty. INTRODUCTION "Governmental 'investigation' involving participation in activities that result in injury to the rights of its citizens is a course that courts should be extremely reluctant to sanction."1 -Judge Henry J. Friendly Sex crimes against children occupy a place of particular horror and fascination in the public imagination. 2 Appealing simultaneously to the most paternal and prurient human instincts, child pornography * This is not an ambitious Note, but I have enjoyed writing it as an exercise in legal analysis and investigation. Thanks are due to Professor Amy Adler for her counsel, to Adav Noti for his invaluable editorial work, and to Travis J.
    [Show full text]
  • Undercover Law Enforcement Operatives' Perceptions of Post
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 Undercover Law Enforcement Operatives’ Perceptions of Post Critical Incident Mental Health Services David B. Spinella Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Psychology Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by David B. Spinella has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Jana Price-Sharps, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Jason Roach, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Christopher Bass, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract Undercover Law Enforcement Operatives‘ Perceptions of Post Critical Incident Mental Health Services by David B. Spinella MBA, University of Phoenix, 2007 MA, Chapman University, 1990 BS, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 1985 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Forensic Psychology Walden University August 2020 Abstract Undercover officers experience unique job-related stressors due to the covert nature and sometimes long duration of their tasks. Undercover officers adopt false identities that involve taking on a personality and lifestyle that the officer might find personally objectionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Thailand
    SOUTHERN THAILAND: THE PROBLEM WITH PARAMILITARIES Asia Report N°140 – 23 October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. PARAMILITARISM IN THAILAND.......................................................................... 2 III. RANGERS....................................................................................................................... 4 A. EXPANSION OF RANGERS IN THE SOUTH................................................................................5 B. TA SEH SHOOTINGS AND ISLAMIC SCHOOL RAID................................................................9 C. THE KILLING OF YAKARIYA PA’OHMANI .............................................................................10 D. ALLEGED RAPE IN PATAE AND THE PATTANI PROTESTS......................................................10 1. The Patae case..........................................................................................................11 2. Patani protests..........................................................................................................12 IV. THE VOLUNTEER DEFENCE CORPS.................................................................. 14 V. VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SELF DEFENCE VOLUNTEERS ................ 15 A. WEAPONS THEFTS ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:14-Cr-00085-JAM Document 112 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 22
    Case 3:14-cr-00085-JAM Document 112 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. No. 3:14-cr-00085 (JAM) CARLOS COLON, et al. RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY (Doc. #36) AND TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT (Doc. #37) This case involves seven criminal defendants who were set up by undercover law enforcement agents to rob a fictional drug ―stash house‖ in Connecticut. They fell victim to a ruse that federal law enforcement agents have deployed with remarkable success against countless suspects nationwide. All seven defendants—some of them armed—gathered one day last April at a parking lot somewhere in Stamford, expecting that they would momentarily proceed to a nearby stash house to rob and help themselves to 15 kilograms or more of lightly guarded cocaine. Instead, a flood of law enforcement agents swept in to arrest them. Each of the defendants now stands charged with conspiracies to engage in robbery, drug trafficking, and related weapons offenses. For their plans to rob a house and cocaine that never existed, each of the defendants likely faces at least 15 years of mandatory minimum imprisonment if convicted on these charges. Defendants jointly move to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the stash-house sting operation that was launched against them amounted to outrageous government conduct in violation of their constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause. Relatedly, defendants contend that they were targeted on account of their race in violation of the Equal Protection 1 Case 3:14-cr-00085-JAM Document 112 Filed 11/17/14 Page 2 of 22 Clause, and they seek discovery to support their claim of selective enforcement and prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrapment and Terrorism Dru Stevenson
    Boston College Law Review Volume 49 Article 3 Issue 1 Number 1 1-1-2008 Entrapment and Terrorism Dru Stevenson Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Dru Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, 49 B.C.L. Rev. 125 (2008), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol49/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENTRAPMENT AND TERRORISM DRU STEVENSON * Abstract: Antiterrorism is a national priority and undercover sting opera- dons are a main antiterrorism tool. As our legal system's primary device for regulating undercover stings, the scope and vigor of the entrapment defense will impact the effectiveness of antiterrorism stings. The federal courts follOw the subjective test of entrapment, focusing on whether the • defendant was predisposed to commit the crime, or if rather the govern- ment induced the defendant to breach a legal norm. This Article argues that given the difficulty of preventing terrorist acts and the civil liberties implications of intrusive surveillance—the alternative to stings—there should be a rebuttable presumption that anyone who provides material support to terrorism was predisposed to do so. This Article argues that terrorism is such a heinous crime that it is unlikely the government could induce someone to support such criminals unless the person was one of the few predisposed to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Terrorism: Overview of Federal Criminal Law and Constitutional Issues
    Domestic Terrorism: Overview of Federal Criminal Law and Constitutional Issues July 2, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46829 SUMMARY R46829 Domestic Terrorism: Overview of Federal July 2, 2021 Criminal Law and Constitutional Issues Peter G. Berris Federal statute defines domestic terrorism to include dangerous criminal acts intended to Legislative Attorney intimidate or coerce a civilian population or to influence or affect government policy or conduct within the jurisdiction of the United States. Despite the federal statutory definition, no federal Michael A. Foster criminal provision expressly prohibits “domestic terrorism.” Nevertheless, numerous federal Legislative Attorney statutes offer prosecutors options in charging violent and destructive conduct consistent with the statutory definition of domestic terrorism. Some of these statutes can be characterized as expressly focused on terrorism, listing criminal offenses to include, among others, providing Jonathan M. Gaffney material support or resources to terrorists and engaging in terrorism transcending domestic Legislative Attorney boundaries. Other generally applicable federal criminal laws may also be relevant to domestic terrorism prosecutions. For example, depending on the defendant’s motive, target, or means, various federal criminal statutes protecting certain property or persons, prohibiting violence motivated by particular biases, or criminalizing possession or use of specific weapons may apply. Depending on the circumstances, prosecutors may also rely on accomplice liability or inchoate offenses such as attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to charge conduct consistent with the definition of domestic terrorism. Beyond applicable offenses, domestic terrorism may be relevant in federal sentencing, either through specific statutes that authorize additional penalties in the domestic terrorism context or through the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which include an upward adjustment for offenses connected to terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Human Rights Thematic Mechanism to Be Established with a Universal Mandate
    A/HRC/19/58/Rev.1 Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 2 March 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Nineteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances* ** Summary The Working Group was the first United Nations human rights thematic mechanism to be established with a universal mandate. The original mandate derives from Commission on Human Rights resolution 20 (XXXVI) of 29 February 1980. This resolution followed General Assembly resolution 33/173 of 20 December 1978, in which the Assembly expressed concern at reports from various parts of the world relating to enforced disappearances and requested the Commission on Human Rights to consider the question of missing or disappeared persons. The mandate was most recently extended by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 16/16 of 24 March 2011. The total number of cases transmitted by the Working Group to Governments since its inception is 53,778. The number of cases under active consideration that have not yet been clarified, closed or discontinued stands at 42,759 in a total of 82 States. The Working Group has been able to clarify 448 cases over the past five years. The present report reflects communications and cases examined by the Working Group during its three sessions in 2011, covering the period 13 November 2010 to 11 November 2011. It includes, in annex I, sections on 95 States and territories; the Working Group’s latest general comment on the right to recognition as a person before the law in the context of enforced disappearance; and the Working Group’s revised methods of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrapment in Cyberspace Jennifer Gregg
    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 19 | Number 1 Article 6 1-1-1996 Caught in the Web: Entrapment in Cyberspace Jennifer Gregg Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Jennifer Gregg, Caught in the Web: Entrapment in Cyberspace, 19 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 157 (1996). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol19/iss1/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caught in the Web: Entrapment in Cyberspace by JENNIFER GREGG* Table of Contents I. Online Child Pornography and the Current Response of Law Enforcem ent ................................................................ 161 II. Overview of Cyberspace ...................................................... 166 A. Levels of Interaction: Terms and Definitions ............ 166 1. Electronic M ail ........................................................ 167 2. Bulletin Board Systems (BBSs) ............... 167 3. FTP & the World Wide Web ................................ 169 B. Unique Attributes of Cyberspace ................ 169 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing the Citizens Protection Act: a Good Thing It Passed, and a Good Thing It Failed
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2013 Reassessing the Citizens Protection Act: A Good Thing It Passed, and a Good Thing It Failed Rima Sirota [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1611 43 Sw. L. Rev. 51 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons 2.SIROTA.ARTICLE.MACRO (DO NOT DELETE) 2/28/2014 4:28 PM REASSESSING THE CITIZENS PROTECTION ACT: A GOOD THING IT PASSED, AND A GOOD THING IT FAILED Rima Sirota* INTRODUCTION Critics have lambasted the Citizens Protection Act of 1998 (the CPA)1 from all ideological perspectives.2 The criticism began at the earliest stages of the legislative debate and continues through the present. With the advantage of fifteen years hindsight, this article demonstrates that the CPA succeeded where it should have and failed where it should have. The CPA has left us—even if inadvertently—with a remarkably coherent and consistent approach to regulating a federal prosecutor’s ability to effectively * Professor of Legal Research and Writing, Georgetown University Law Center; previously Attorney Advisor, U.S. Dept. of Justice Professional Responsibility Advisory Office. I extend my thanks to Julie Ross, Jeffrey Shulman, Kristen Tiscione, Julie O’Sullivan, Patricia Weiss, and Anita Gay for their comments and encouragement and to Sarah Scott for her excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    _--__ ___ -~ -~_ W es I POLicY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 1806 Public Disclosure Authorized An International Statistical Detailed statisticalard econometric eviden,-e on Surveyof (Government governmentemploynew Employment and Wages and pay, both global and Public Disclosure Authorized Employmnentand wagesreinl regiornal. Salvatore Schiavo-Ca'ampo Gitdio de 7ommaso Amitabba Muckherjee Public Disclosure Authorized Background paper for World Developmentt eport 1997 The World Bank Office of the Chief Economist anc Senior Vic., President, Development Econonmics Public Disclosure Authorized and Europe and Central Asia, and Middle Last anJ North Africa Technical Departmenti PutblicSector Managcrient antdInfor-nmation i echnology Team H August I 9q7 POLIcY RESFARCH WORKING PAPER 1806 Summary findings This paper complements a separate study in this Series Schiavo-Campo, de Tommaso, and Mukherjee briefly ("Government Employment and Pay: A Global and summarize the key findings of the earlier paper for the Regional Perspective," Policy Research Working Paper reader's convenience and to permit this paper to stand 1771, May 1997) by providing the detailed statistical and alone. However, the purpose of the paper is to provide econometric evidence on which that separate study is the country-by-country statistics. The reader is referred based. to the companion paper for a description and analysis of the main findings. This paper - a joint product of the Office of the Chief Economist and Senior Vice President, Development Economics, and Europe and Central Asia, and Middle East and North Africa Technical Department, Public Sector Management and Information Technology Team- was produced as a background paper for AVorld Deuelopme7nt Report 1997 on the role of the state in a changing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers in Berets the Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003
    Brothers in Berets The Evolution of Air Force Special Tactics, 1953-2003 Forrest L. Marion, PhD Air Force History and Museums Program In Conjunction With Air Force Special Operations Command Air University Press Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editors Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belinda Bazinet and Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Names: Marion, Forrest L., author. | Air University (U.S.). Press, publisher. | Curtis E. LeMay Center for Copy Editor Doctrine Development and Education, issuing body. Tammi Dacus Title: Brothers in berets : the evolution of Air Force Cover Art and Book Design Special Tactics, 1953-2003 / Forrest L. Marion Daniel Armstrong Description: First edition. | Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, Curtis E. LeMay Cen- Composition and Prepress Production Michele D. Harrell ter for Doctrine Development and Education, [2018]. | At head of title: Air University, Curtis E. LeMay Center Print Preparation and Distribution for Doctrine Development and Education. | Includes Diane Clark bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017059577| ISBN 9781585662784 | ISBN 158566278X Subjects: LCSH: United States. Air Force—Combat controllers—History. | United States. Air Force— Commando troops—History. | Special forces (Military science)—United States—History. | United States. Air Force Special Operations Command. Classification: LCC UG633 .M3144 2018 | DDC AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS 358.4131—dc23 | SUDOC D 301.26/6:T 11
    [Show full text]
  • CILIP 001 Eng.Pdf
    C I LI P VOL.1, NO, 1 AUGUST/OCTOBER 1978 NEWSLETTER ON CIVIL LIBERTIES SAND POLICE DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF EDITORS: H. BUSCH - A. FUNK - U. KAUSS - W.D. NARR - F, WERKENTIN - TH.V. ZABERN MANAGING EDITORS: TH.V.ZABERN - F.WERKENTIN THE NEWSLETTER PUBLISHES INFORMATION, NEWS, DATA AND ANALYSES ON THE FOLLOWING SUBJECTS: 1 METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF POLICE RESEARCH II STRUCTURAL DATA OF POLICE DEVELOPMENT IN WESTERN EUROPE III LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IV POLICE IN ACTION V POLICE IN EUROPE VI POLICE AID TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES VII THE PUBLIC'S PREROGATIVE: CONTROL OF THE POLICE VIII TOWARDS A CRITICAL PUBLIC IX CASE STUDIES X REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION - OPPORTUNITIES FOR COLLABORATION THE C 1 L 1 .P NEWSLETTER IS PUBLISHED IN ENGLISH AND GERMAN THREE TIMES A YEAR wr SUBSCRIPTION PRICE DM 20,- PER YEAR FOR INDIVIDUALS: DM 3o,- PER YEAR FOR INSTITUTIONS SINGLE ISSUE DM 8,- EDITORIAL ADDRESS: C I L I P c/o Berghof-Stiftung für Konfliktforschung Winklerstr. 4a l000 Berlin 33 West-Germany POSTAL ACCOUNT: SPECIAL ACCOUNT C I L I P, Th.v.Zabern. Nr. 29 ol o2 - 1o2 BlnW CONTENTS Page EDITORIAL 1 METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF POLICE RESEARCH 4 Ideas on how to obtain data on the structure and operational procedure of the security bureaucracy 4 Is publishing unlawful executive actions a criminal offence? The 'Faust' case 5 II STRUCTURAL DATA OF POLICE DEVELOPMENT IN WESTERN EUROPE 9 Some data on the development of the Norwegian police, by Hakon Lorentzen 9 III LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS 19 _Anti-terror legislation in Western Europe 19 Anti-terror legislation in Greece: An interview with Prof.D.
    [Show full text]