US EPA Risks of Phosmet Use to the Federally Threatened And

Risks of Phosmet Use to the Federally Threatened and Endangered California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense) N-(Mercaptomethyl) phthalimide-S-(O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate) CAS Registry Number: 732-11-6 PC Code: 059201 Pesticide Effects Determinations Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 29 March 2010 Primary Authors: Chuck Peck, Environmental Engineer Catherine Aubee, Biologist Secondary Review: Marietta Echeverria, Environmental Scientist/RAPL Melissa Panger, Biologist Branch Chief, Environmental Risk Assessment Branch 4: Elizabeth Behl 2 Acknowledgement We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the Litigation Steering Committee in compiling detailed information on the species and Geographic Information System analysis used to define the potential overlap between habitat and occurrence with the areas of potential effects. Additionally, the Steering Committee has provided invaluable guidance toward achieving greater consistency in format and content between chemicals being assessed. 3 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 14 1.1. PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT....................................................................................14 1.2. SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT........................................................................................14 1.2.1. Uses Assessed............................................................................................14 1.2.2. Environmental Fate Properties of Phosmet................................................14 1.2.3. Evaluation of Degradates and Stressors of Concern..................................15 1.3. ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES..................................................................................15 1.3.1. Exposure Assessment.................................................................................15 1.3.2. Toxicity Assessment ..................................................................................15 1.3.3. Measures of Risk........................................................................................16 1.4. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................16 1.4.1. Exposure to Phosmet..................................................................................16 1.4.2. Toxicity of Phosmet...................................................................................17 1.4.3. Risks Associated with Phosmet Use..........................................................17 2. PROBLEM FORMULATION ....................................................................... 21 2.1. PURPOSE ..............................................................................................................21 2.2. SCOPE ..................................................................................................................22 2.2.1. Evaluation of Degradates and Other Stressors of Concern........................23 2.2.2. Evaluation of Mixtures ..............................................................................23 2.3. PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS .....................................................................................24 2.4. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE PROPERTIES ...................................................................25 2.4.1. Environmental Transport Mechanisms......................................................27 2.4.2. Mechanism of Action.................................................................................27 2.4.3. Use Characterization..................................................................................28 2.5. ASSESSED SPECIES...............................................................................................33 2.6. DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT.........................................................................34 2.7. ACTION AREA AND EFFECTS DETERMINATION AREA ..........................................37 2.7.1. Action Area................................................................................................37 2.7.2. Effects Determination Area .......................................................................37 2.8. ASSESSMENT ENDPOINTS AND MEASURES OF ECOLOGICAL EFFECT....................40 2.8.1. Assessment Endpoints...............................................................................40 2.8.2. Assessment Endpoints for Designated Critical Habitat.............................42 2.9. CONCEPTUAL MODEL ..........................................................................................42 2.9.1. Risk Hypotheses.........................................................................................42 2.9.2. Diagram......................................................................................................43 2.10. ANALYSIS PLAN...................................................................................................45 2.10.1. Measures of Exposure................................................................................46 2.10.2. Measures of Effect .....................................................................................47 2.10.3. Data Gaps...................................................................................................47 3. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 48 3.1. LABEL APPLICATION RATES AND INTERVALS ......................................................48 4 3.2. AQUATIC EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................51 3.2.1. Modeling Approach ...................................................................................51 3.2.2. Model Inputs..............................................................................................52 3.2.3. Results........................................................................................................54 3.2.4. Existing Monitoring Data..........................................................................55 3.3. TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT..................................................56 3.3.1. Exposure to Residues in Terrestrial Food Items........................................56 3.4. TERRESTRIAL PLANT EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ....................................................61 4. EFFECTS ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 62 4.1. ECOTOXICITY STUDY DATA SOURCES .................................................................63 4.2. TOXICITY OF PHOSMET TO AQUATIC ORGANISMS ...............................................64 4.2.1. Toxicity to Freshwater Fish and Aquatic-Phase Amphibians....................66 4.2.2. Toxicity to Freshwater Invertebrates .........................................................68 4.2.3. Toxicity to Aquatic Plants .........................................................................69 4.2.4. Aquatic Field/Mesocosm Studies ..............................................................70 4.3. TOXICITY OF PHOSMET TO TERRESTRIAL ORGANISMS.........................................70 4.3.1. Toxicity to Birds (and Terrestrial-Phase Amphibians)..............................71 4.3.2. Toxicity to Mammals.................................................................................72 4.3.3. Toxicity to Terrestrial Invertebrates ..........................................................73 4.3.4. Toxicity to Terrestrial Plants .....................................................................73 4.4. TOXICITY OF CHEMICAL MIXTURES.....................................................................75 4.5. INCIDENT DATABASE REVIEW .............................................................................75 4.5.1. Terrestrial Incidents...................................................................................75 4.5.2. Plant Incidents............................................................................................75 4.5.3. Aquatic Incidents.......................................................................................75 4.6. USE OF PROBIT SLOPE RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE ENDANGERED SPECIES LEVELS OF CONCERN ...............................................76 5. RISK CHARACTERIZATION...................................................................... 76 5.1. RISK ESTIMATION ................................................................................................77 5.1.1. Exposures in the Aquatic Habitat ..............................................................77 5.1.2. Exposures in the Terrestrial Habitat ..........................................................81 5.1.3. Primary Constituent Elements of Designated Critical Habitat ..................85 5.2. RISK DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................86 5.2.1. Direct Effects on CTS................................................................................89 5.2.2. Indirect Effects on CTS .............................................................................91 5.2.3. Modification of Designated Critical Habitat..............................................95 5.2.4. Spatial Extent of Potential Effects .............................................................96 5.3. EFFECTS DETERMINATIONS ...............................................................................100 5.3.1. California Tiger Salamander....................................................................100

Load more