DOCSLIB.ORG

8.0 Bibliography for Ohio History, 1940-1970

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8.0 Bibliography for Ohio History, 1940-1970 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR OHIO HISTORY, 1940-1970 Related National Register Bulletins Keller, Timothy, and Genevieve P. Keller n.d. How to Evaluate and Nominate Designed Historic Landscapes. National Register Bulletin 18. Interagency Resources Division, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. <http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb18/>. Lee, Antoinette J., and Linda F. McClelland 1999 How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form. National Register Bulletin 16B. Interagency Resources Division, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC. <http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb16b/>. McClelland, Linda Flint, J. Timothy Keller, Genevieve P. Keller, and Robert Z. Melnick 1999 Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Rural Historic Landscapes. National Register Bulletin 30. Interagency Resources Division, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. <http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb30/>. Milbrooke, Anne 1998 Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Historic Aviation Properties. National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. <http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/ publications/bulletins/aviation/>. Sherfy, Marcella, and W. Ray Luce 1998 Guidelines for Evaluating and Nominating Properties that Have Achieved Significance within the Past Fifty Years. National Register Bulletin 22. National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. <http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/ publications/bulletins/nrb22/>. Regulatory Guidelines Advisory Council for Historic Preservation (ACHP) 2004 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties. Federal Register, September 2, 1986, as amended in August 2004. Washington, D.C. United States Department of the Interior, Interagency Resources Division (USDI) 1983 Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Federal Register 48(190): 44716-44742. Washington, D.C. 233 Methodology and Survey Guidelines Abele, Deborah Edge, and Grady Gammage, Jr. 2000 Shifting Signposts of Significance. In Preserving the Recent Past 2, edited by Deborah Slaton and William G. Foulks. Historic Preservation Foundation, Association for Preservation Technology, and National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Alliance for Historic Landscape Preservation 1999 Historic Landscape Resource Manual. National Center for Preservation Technology and Training, Natchitoches, Louisiana. Hope, Andrew 2005 Evaluating the Significance of San Lorenzo Village, A Mid-20th Century Suburban Community. CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship 2 (2). Page, Robert R., Cathy A. Gilbert, and Susan A. Dolan 1998 A Guide to Cultural Landscape Reports: Contents, Process, and Techniques. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, Park Historic Structures and Cultural Landscapes Program, Washington, D.C. Terrell, Greta 1996 Getting to Know Your Twentieth Century Neighborhood. Information Sheet. National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, D.C. Ohio’s Historical Development since 1950 Arnold, Joseph L. 1971 The New Deal in the Suburbs: A History of the Greenbelt Town Program, 1935- 1954. Ohio State University Press, Columbus. Campen, Richard. 1973 Ohio: An Architectural Portrait. West Summit Press, Chagrin Falls. Department of Industrial and Economic Development 1960 Ohio Population Growth and Distribution. Department of Industrial and Economic Development, Miami University. Location: OHS Archives/Library Division of Urban Renewal 1966 A Review of Urban Renewal Progress, 1966. Division of Urban Renewal, Columbus, Ohio. Location: Columbus Public Library Main Knepper, George W. 1987 A History of the Economy of Ohio. Akron Beacon Journal, Akron. 1997 Ohio and Its People. The Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio. 234 McCormick, Virginia E. 2001 Educational Architecture in Ohio: From One-Room Schools and Carnegie Libraries to Community and Educational Villages. Kent State University Press, Kent. Miller, Zane, and Thomas Jenkins, eds. 1982 The Planning Partnership: Participant Views of Urban Renewal. Sage Publishers, Beverly Hills. Oakland, William H. 1979? Ohio's Economic and Population Trends. Academy for Contemporary Problems, Columbus, Ohio. Location: OHS Archives/Library Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Division of Research and Statistics. 1976 Employment by Industry in Ohio Counties 1940-1970. The Bureau, Columbus, Ohio. Repository: Youngstown Archives/Library. Ohio Department of Development Economic Research Division 1961 Economic Growth of Major Industrial Areas in Ohio. Ohio Department of Development Economic Research Division, Columbus. Location: OHS Archives/Library Ohio Department of Development Planning Division 1968 Agriculture in Ohio. Ohio Department of Development Planning Division, Columbus. Location: OHS Archives/Library Ohio Historical Society 2009 Ohio Memory. <http://www.ohiomemory.org/>. [historic aerial and skyline photographs – search under “architecture.”] Ostrander, Stephen 2002 Ohio: A Bicentennial Portrait. Brown Trout Publishers, San Francisco. Pearson, Ralph L. 1977 Ohio in Century Three – Quality of Life: A Conference to Commemorate the Bicentennial of the American Revolution. Ohio American Revolution Bicentennial Conference Series, Columbus. Van Tine, Warren R. 2003 Builders of Ohio: A Biographical History. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus. Ware, Jane 2001 Building Ohio: A Traveler's Guide to Ohio's Urban Architecture. Orange Frazer Press, Wilmington, Ohio. 235 2002 Building Ohio: A Traveler’s Guide to Ohio’s Rural Architecture. Orange Frazer Press, Wilmington, Ohio. African American History in Ohio Chatterjee, Pranab 1975 Local Leadership in Black Communities: Organizational and Electoral Developments in Cleveland in the Nineteen Sixties. School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland. Cincinnati Better Housing League 1966 Report on Housing for Negroes. May 1965. Cincinnati Urban Studies Project. Davis, R. H. 1972 Black Americans in Cleveland: From George Peake to Carl B. Stokes, 1796-1969. The Associated Publishers, Cleveland. Fuller, Sara, and Edie Hedlin 1975 The Ohio Black History Guide. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus. Heath, Marilyn S. 1973 A Study of the Distribution of Negroes in Ohio: 1940-1970. Thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio. Hiltner, John 1967 Negro Migration in a Section of Toledo, Ohio. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 57: March 1967, pp. 177-187. Jackson, Kenneth T. 1980 Race, Ethnicity, and Real Estate Appraisal: The Home Owners Loan Corporation and the Federal Housing Administration. Journal of Urban History 6: August 1980, pp. 419-452. Krawcheck, Julian 1963 The Negro in Cleveland: A Cleveland History, 1809-1963. Cleveland Press, Cleveland. Lackritz, Marc E. 1968 The Hough Riots of 1966. Unpublished monograph. August 1, 1968. Regional Church Planning Office, Cleveland, Ohio. Lentz, Edward R. 1969 Rationalization and Reform: The Columbus Urban League, 1942-1962. Thesis, The Ohio State University Columbus. 236 McKee, James B. 1963 Changing Patterns of Race and Housing: A Toledo Study. Social Forces 41. March 1963, pp. 253-260. Miller, Zane, and Geoffrey Giglierano 1982 Downtown Housing: Changing Plans and Perspectives, 1948-1980. Cincinnati Historical Society Bulletin 40. Fall 1982, p. 167-190. Miller, Zane, and Thomas Jenkins, eds. 1982 The Planning Partnership: Participant Views of Urban Renewal. Sage Publishers, Beverly Hills. Murphy, Melvin 1970 The Columbus Urban League: A History, 1917-1967. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Myers, Phineas B. 1959 Ninety-Five Years after Lincoln: A History of the Urban League of Dayton, Ohio. Exposition Press, New York. Ritchey, Mary E. 1967 A Descriptive Study of the Civil Disturbance in Dayton, Ohio, September 1, 1966, in the Context of its Local and National Setting. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Schmore, Leo, and Harry Sharp 1963 Racial Change in Metropolitan Areas. Social Forces 41: March 1963, pp. 347- 253. Taylor, Henry 1984 Black Ohio in the Contemporary Era, 1950-Present: A Review of the Literature. Paper presented at Ohio in Our Time: Major Themes in the State’s History Since WWII, A Conference. The Ohio Historical Center, Columbus Ohio, November 9- 10, 1984. Weisman, Kay 1983 Selected Bibliography of Black History Sources at the Ohio Historical Society. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus. Williams, Walter 1967 Cleveland’s Crisis Ghetto. Transaction 4: September 1967, pp. 33-42. 237 Agriculture in Ohio Andrews, Wade H., and Emily M. Westerkamm 1953 Rural-urban Population Change and Migration in Ohio, 1940-1950. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 737. November 1953. Andrews, Wade H. 1961 1960 Changes in Population and Agriculture in Ohio and Their Implications. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. Circular 104: May 1961. Hurt, R. Douglas 1999 Ohio Agriculture since World War II. Ohio History (97), pp. 50-71. <http://www.ohiohistory.org>. Hurt, R. Douglas 1984 Ohio Agriculture Since World War II. Paper presented at Ohio in Our Time: Major Themes in the State’s History Since WWII, A Conference. The Ohio Historical Center, Columbus Ohio, November 9-10, 1984. Moore, H.R., and R. A. Bailey 1958 The Ohio Farm Real Estate Situation. Ohio Agricultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Development, Land Use, and the System of Cities in Northwest Ohio During the Nineteenth Century
    CREATING CONNECTIONS: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LAND USE, AND THE SYSTEM OF CITIES IN NORTHWEST OHIO DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Matthew D. Bloom A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2009 Committee: Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor David Shoemaker Graduate Faculty Representative Edmund J. Danziger, Jr. Timothy F. Messer-Kruse © 2009 Matthew D. Bloom All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor Examining how economics, geography, and politics interacted in the expansion and economic changes within the United States, this dissertation investigated the symbiotic relationships and their qualities among the economic transformations of an urban area and its surrounding hinterland throughout the nineteenth century. Specifically, it investigated how the economic and population changes within Toledo, Ohio, molded the development of agricultural hinterlands and how the condition and settlement of the surrounding rural areas shaped the economic changes of Toledo. The quality of transportation connections among Toledo and other nascent towns, market interactions among residents, and the relationships between land quality and usage provided for symbiotic economic development of urban areas and rural hinterlands. The ability to use certain transportation infrastructures, the condition of land, and the availability of natural resources determined the type, quantity, and strength of market connections among people, which influenced the amount and forms of economic change for the area. Conclusions of this study were drawn from analyzing census records, newspaper advertisements and editorials, agricultural reports, and business records and literature. This research introduced a new paradigm of regional economic change named the “subregional model” which included a hub, local economic centers, small villages and farms, and links of various qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's Food Systems – Farms at the Heart of It
    Crossroads Resource Center 7415 Humboldt Ave. S. / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 / 612.869.8664 [email protected] www.crcworks.org Tools for Community Self-determination Ohio’s Food Systems – Farms At The Heart Of It All By Ken Meter Crossroads Resource Center March 30, 2011 Commissioned by the University of Toledo Urban Affairs Center with funds from the Ohio Department of Agriculture Ohio’s Food Systems — Farms at the Heart of It All — Ken Meter, March, 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................4 A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH.......................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 11 ELEMENTS OF THE FOOD AND FARM ECONOMY OF OHIO ................................................. 15 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FOOD IN OHIO........................................................................................... 18 RECENT TRENDS IN OHIO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ..........................................................35 EMERGING FOOD BUSINESS CLUSTERS ......................................................................................58 ATHENS SETS THE TONE .............................................................................................................................................. 58 FRESH MILK BUILDS CLUSTERS OF BUSINESSES........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OHFOOD: an Ohio Food Industries Input-Output Model (Year 2010, Version 13.0, June 2012)
    OHFOOD: An Ohio Food Industries Input-Output Model (Year 2010, Version 13.0, June 2012) by Thomas L. Sporleder1 Abstract OHFOOD, an acronym for Ohio food, is a sophisticated input-output model. The model is designed specifically to capture the interdependencies and linkages among various sectors and industries composing the complex economy of Ohio. The input-output model of Ohio's economy also maintains substantial detail on the food and agricultural sectors, referred to as the agrifood supply chain. The interindustry model describes the linkages among various sectors of the economy and is designed specifically to provide estimates of the economic importance of the food and agriculture-related cluster, along with the general manufacturing and service sectors, of the Ohio economy. In addition, OHFOOD provides several types of economic multipliers for detailed food and agriculture-related sectors of the economy. This abstract is a brief overview of the importance of food and agriculture to the state's economy, based on the interindustry model. The analysis indicates that for 2010 the food and agricultural cluster of Ohio's economy contributed 11.7 percent of the output, added 10.7 percent to Ohio’s gross state product, and accounted for 14.0 percent of the total employment in the Ohio economy. The agrifood cluster of the Ohio economy accounts for 1 of every 7 jobs in Ohio. Of these, over 93,000 jobs are in production agriculture with over an additional 59,000 just in food processing. In 2010, the Ohio economy generated a gross state product (GSP) of $477.7 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's Food Systems – Farms at the Heart of It
    Crossroads Resource Center 7415 Humboldt Ave. S. / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 / 612.869.8664 [email protected] www.crcworks.org Tools for Community Self-determination EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ONLY Ohio’s Food Systems – Farms At The Heart Of It All By Ken Meter Crossroads Resource Center March 30, 2011 Commissioned by the University of Toledo Urban Affairs Center with funds from the Ohio Department of Agriculture Ohio’s Food Systems — Farms at the Heart of It All — Ken Meter, March, 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 4 A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH................................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 11 ELEMENTS OF THE FOOD AND FARM ECONOMY OF OHIO ......................................................... 15 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FOOD IN OHIO..................................................................................................... 18 RECENT TRENDS IN OHIO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ................................................................... 35 EMERGING FOOD BUSINESS CLUSTERS............................................................................................... 58 ATHENS SETS THE TONE..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economy of Ohio Grew More Slowly Than That of the United States During 1987-2001
    Ohio’s Economy Economy of Ohio Grew More Slowly Than That of the United States during 1987-2001 Inflation-Adjusted Gross State Product 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% % change from year earlier -2% 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 U.S. GDP Ohio GSP Great Lakes States 2001 Gross State Product (GSP) Billions of State National Rank Current Dollars Illinois $475.5 5 Ohio $373.7 7 Michigan $320.5 9 Indiana $189.9 16 Wisconsin $177.4 20 · Ohio’s 2001 gross state product (latest available) of $373.7 billion made it the 2nd largest economy in the Great Lakes region, behind Illinois, and 7th largest in the United States. In comparison with the gross domestic product of the United States and other countries, Ohio’s economy ranked 15th largest. · During the period from 1986 through 2001, Ohio’s nominal GSP grew by 103%, or 4.8% annually (average annual compounded growth rate). U.S. nominal GDP grew by 133%, or 5.8% annually. Ohio’s share of national economic activity fell to 3.7% in 2001 from 4.2% 15 years earlier. The Great Lakes region's GSP grew by 111%, or 5.1% annually. · Over the 1986-2001 period, Ohio’s real (inflation-adjusted) GSP grew by 44%, or 2.5% annually. U.S. real GDP grew by 60%, or 3.2% annually. The Great Lakes region's GSP grew by 50%, or 2.7% annually. 6 Ohio Legislative Service Commission Ohio’s Economy Ohio Income Per Person Less Than U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GIFFIN, William Wayne, 1938- the NEGRO in OHIO, 1914-1939. The
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received GIFFIN, William Wayne, 1938- THE NEGRO IN OHIO, 1914-1939. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1968 History, modern University Microf ilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by William Wayne Giffin 1969 THE NEGRO IN OHIO, 1914-1959 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By William Wayne Giffin, B.A., B.S. Ed., A.M. ****** The Ohio State University 1968 Approved by Adviser Department of History. PREFACE This dissertation concerns the public life of Negro Ohioans, their standing in the wider society of Ohio and their responses to this. It deals, to be more explicit, with the conditions of Negroes in relation to employment, housing and education; their treatment in public accommo­ dations; and their role in politics and government. The organizational response of Negroes to the status of the Negro population of Ohio is also stressed. Each of these factors is discussed in relation to the periods 1914-1919, I92O-I929 and 1950-1 9 3 9 * The research for this monograph was done in sources deposited in government, museum and university libraries. This dissertation is not, per se, cultural, social or intellectual history of the Negro in Ohio. Therefore, it is not basically concerned with the development of Negro' groups and institutions, e.g., families, churdæs, schools and fraternal organizations. Likewise, it does not cover the development of Negro art, music and drama. These as­ pects of the history of the Negro in Ohio are worthy of study and hopefully will be researched.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry-Based Competitive Strategies for Ohio: Managing Three Portfolios
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Urban Publications Affairs 5-2005 Industry-Based Competitive Strategies for Ohio: Managing Three Portfolios Edward W. Hill Cleveland State University, [email protected] Larry C. Ledebur Cleveland State University, [email protected] Matthew Sattler Jacob Duritsky Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub Part of the Growth and Development Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Repository Citation Hill, Edward W.; Ledebur, Larry C.; Sattler, Matthew; and Duritsky, Jacob, "Industry-Based Competitive Strategies for Ohio: Managing Three Portfolios" (2005). Urban Publications. 0 1 2 3 8. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/8 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Industry-Based Competitive Strategies for Ohio: Managing Three Portfolios Economic Development Strategies That Build From Current Strengths and Address Competitive Challenges SUBMITTED TO THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND TECHSOLVE May 2005 ABOUT THE AUTHORS DELOITTE CONSULTING, LLP Leigh Digel Mr. Digel served as the Project Partner for the Industry Based Competitive Strategies Study for Ohio. Mr. Digel has over fourteen years of manufacturing industry operations consulting experience in performance improvement, process redesign, supply chain management, and shared services. He has led numerous process redesign engagements focused in the areas of operations, distribution, and customer service.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Economic Impact of the Film Industry in Northeast Ohio & Ohio
    Analysis and Economic Impact of the Film Industry in Northeast Ohio & Ohio Report Prepared by Candi Clouse, M.S. Center for Economic Development Report prepared March 2012 Great things can happen when you're doing a movie. ~ James L. Brooks Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Study Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: The Ohio Motion Picture Tax Credit............................................................................................ 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Credits in Other States .............................................................................................................................. 3 Summing the Credit .................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Local Businesses Booming from Filming ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Job Growth
    Oil and Natural Gas Stimulate Ohio Economic and Job Growth Oil and natural gas are driving the U.S. economy through a major energy boom and that boom is rippling through the economy of Ohio, supporting business activity across the state. This finding grows out of a new American Petroleum Institute survey of domestic oil and natural gas vendors,1 which offers $28.4 BILLION a glimpse into the job and business creation engine that is the current oil and natural gas industry. The survey shows that at least 636 businesses, spread THE INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTES across all 16 of Ohio’s congressional districts, are part of the larger oil and natural TO OHIO’S ECONOMY gas supply chain. And this is clearly a small snapshot of the vast number of business throughout Ohio who are benefitting from shale development, with the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services reporting that there are more than 13,000 shale-related business establishments in the state.2 The survey’s snapshot of state-by-state Ohio enjoy significant benefits from energy activity reinforces the impressive level development.4 The benefits show up in 255,100 of industry success throughout the the state’s salary statistics as well. Thus, country that is documented in a recent while the average annual salary in Ohio OHIO JOBS PriceWaterhouseCoopers study conducted across all industries and sectors is $44,059, for the American Petroleum Institute.3 That the average oil and gas industry salary study found that the oil and natural gas (excluding gas stations) is substantially SUPPORTED BY OIL AND industry in Ohio supports some 255,100 higher—$72,238 annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio the Many Sides of the Forest Economy
    1 The many sides of the forest economy Letter from State Forester Ohio’s forest products industry contributes $15 billion to the Ohio economy, employs over 119,000 people and generates payrolls that exceed $4 billion dollars. The forest economy is influenced by a wide variety of market segments that include timber harvesting, lumber and veneer production, furniture and cabinet manufacturing, paper manufacturing and a healthy export market for logs and lumber. Economic contributions are also made by non-timber related products such as maple syrup and Christmas trees. Forests are unique in that their values can be enjoyed in a wide variety of ways. They can be expressed in terms of recreational enjoyment such as hiking, camping, hunting, fishing or the simple enjoyment of autumn colors. Forest values also can be expressed in returns to environmental quality like clean air and water, such as when forests protect municipal watersheds. Recently, a new value has been created with the advent of the carbon credits market. The list of benefits that the forest provides is extensive to be sure, but would not be complete if it did not include the economic returns that are provided in employment, output and income. This report details those values and the benefits they have on the economy of Ohio. John Dorka, State Forester & Chief Division of Forestry Ohio Department of Natural Resources Economics of the Forest Products Industry in Ohio 2 Highlights The state of Ohio has approximately 8.1 million acres under forest cover, which is 30% of Ohio’s land area. The forests in Ohio are composed of 96% hardwood tree species and 4% softwood tree species.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT DECEMBER 2017 For over 150 years, University Hospitals (UH) has been healing, teaching and discovering with one purpose in mind: improving the health and well-being of those in our community. Research has shown there is a direct correlation between population wealth and population health, and for this reason our commitment to the communities we serve transcends the walls of our health system by spurring economic growth and development. We engaged Silverlode Consulting Corp. to measure ABOUT UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS our economic impacts for calendar year 2016. Silverlode also conducted a similar study for calendar University Hospitals serves the needs of patients year 2013, enabling us to compare our progress.1 through an integrated network of 18 hospitals, more than 40 outpatient health centers and 200 physician STATE LEVEL IMPACTS offices in 15 counties throughout northern Ohio. The UH contributes significantly to the economy of Ohio. system’s flagship academic medical center, UH Its facilities supported over 63,000 direct and indirect Cleveland Medical Center is affiliated with Case jobs and over $4 billion of labor income in 2016. This Western Reserve University School of Medicine. The represents nearly 44,000 households, which spent main campus also includes UH Rainbow Babies & over $2.5 billion purchasing goods and services in the Children's Hospital, ranked among the top children’s state. hospitals in the nation; UH MacDonald Women's Hospital, Ohio's only hospital for women; and UH The construction and permanent activity of UH drove Seidman Cancer Center, part of the NCI-designated over $7.7 billion of total output in the State’s Case Comprehensive Cancer Center.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ohio Food Industries Input- Output Model
    OHFOOD: An Ohio Food Industries input-Output Model (Version 10.0, April 2008) Thomas L. Sporleder Abstract OHFOOD, an acronym for Ohio food, is a sophisticated input-output model. The model is designed specifically to capture the interdependencies and linkages among various sectors and industries composing the complex economy of Ohio. The input-output model of Ohio's economy also maintains substantial detail on the food and agricultural sectors. The interindustry model describes the linkages among various sectors of the economy and is designed specifically to provide estimates of the economic importance of the food and agriculture-related cluster, along with the general manufacturing and service sectors, of the Ohio economy. Also, OHFOOD provides several types of economic multipliers for detailed food and agriculture-related sectors of the economy. This executive summary provides a brief overview of the importance of food and agriculture to the state's economy, based on the interindustry model. The analysis indicates that for 2006 the food and agricultural cluster of Ohio's economy contributed 11 percent of the output, added 8 percent to Ohio's gross state product, accounted for 14 percent of the total employment, and contributed 8 percent of total income. In 2006, the Ohio economy generated a gross state product (GSP) of $461.3 billion. The food and agricultural cluster's share of this GSP was $38.3 billion, or $8.31 of each $100 of Ohio GSP. For 2006 the contributions to GSP for the five components of the agrifood cluster are $1.7 billion for farm inputs, machinery, and professional services; another $2.6 billion from agricultural production; about $12.4 billion from processing; an additional $12.8 from food wholesaling and retailing; and another $8.7 billion in food services.
    [Show full text]