DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development DOCUMENT RESUME ED 467 790 SO 033 025 AUTHOR Ayers, Deborah TITLE The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development for Ohio. Teaching with Historic Places. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. National Register of Historic Places. PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 27p. AVAILABLE FROM Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/41ohio/ 4lohio. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Curriculum Enrichment; *Economic Development; Heritage Education; *Historic Sites; Intermediate Grades; Primary Sources; Secondary Education; Social Studies; Student Educational Objectives; *Transportation; *United States History IDENTIFIERS Canals; National Register of Historic Places ABSTRACT In the 19th century, canal boats pulled along by mules carried much cargo. The canal boat was the family business, their livelihood, and their home. In Ohio, these boats glided gracefully along the Ohio and Erie Canal, heavily laden with lumber on its way north to Lake Erie where it was transferred to a lake freighter and sent to Buffalo (New York) and the Erie Canal. This lesson plan is based on the National Register of Historic Places file "Ohio and Erie Canal" and park documents. The lesson can be used in teaching units about transportation or the economic development of the western frontier in the early-to-mid 1800s. It cites educational objectives for students and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context";(4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Canals of Ohio); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Ohio's Shot in the Arm; Construction and Operation of the Ohio and Erie Canal); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Cross Section of the Ohio and Erie Canal; Parts of a Lock Gate; Peninsula Lock; House at Lock 38,c. 1875; Modern View of House at Lock 38; Workers Repairing the Canal; Wash Day on the Canal; Canal Boat Family); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Life on the Ohio and Erie Canal; Effects of Transportation on Daily Life; Importance of Transportation Systems); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. The National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development for Ohio Teaching with Historic Places National Register of Historic Places National Park Service 1849 C. Street, N.W., Suite NC400 Washington, D.C. 20240 http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhP/wwwlps/lessons/41 oh io/41 ohio.htm U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Of lice of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) e This document has been reproducedas received from the person or organization 2001 originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. I A Program of the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places BEST COPY AVAI BILE at" e Final P Se Teaching with Historic Places (TwHP) is a program of the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register is maintained by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, as the nations's official list of cultural resources significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. TwHP is sponsored, in part, by the Cultural Resources Training Initiative and Parks as Classrooms programs of the National Park Service. This lesson is one in a series that brings the important stories of historic places into classrooms across the country. For more information, contact Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic places, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, D.C. 20240, or visit the program's Web site at www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp. 3 The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development for Ohio Low bridge, everybody down! yells the canal boat C, 4 captain. As they clear the 3 ,, ,,te bridge, his wife begins Nc. 'N. 1, hanging her laundry from a Ill P rope tied on posts running .. au between the cargo holds. I :11ili Their smallest child sits tied ,-, _.,--_,..--- -- -- .,1 to the deck, so she will not 1,F '..,...i. _.. rl fall into the water and l'r drown. The oldest son is the w h steersman. He must always _ i ...- v. :, ,- .,,.4, ,..1., mt-E4...;.._e compensate for the -.,, ,_ sideward pull of the mule .:..--,.e- r :impri.....: ------, team that plods along the Cuyahoga Valley National Park edge of the canal tugging on ropes attached to the boat. The mule skinner walks silently with the mules, making sure they do not sit down on the job. This boat is the family business- their livelihood--and their home. Gliding gracefully along the Ohio & Erie Canal, the boat is heavily laden with lumber on its way north to Lake Erie where it will be transferred to a lake freighter and sent to Buffalo and the Erie Canal. As the boat approaches a lock, the mule skinner prepares to unhitch the mules, and the crew grab their pikes, ready to push the boat into the lock. Inside the lock chamber the sluice gate on the downstream gate opens and the water slowly begins to drop eight feet. After "locking through," the crew again hitch the mules and continue on their way. This lesson is based on the Ohio and Erie Canal, one of the thousands of properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. 14 Table of Contents About This Lesson Getting Started: Inquiry Questions Setting the Stage: Historical Context Locating the Site: Maps 1. Canals of Ohio Determining the Facts: Readings 1. Ohio's Shot in the Arm 2. Construction and Operation of the Ohio & Erie Canal Visual Evidence: Images 1. Cross section of the Ohio & Erie Canal 2. Parts of a lock gate 3. Peninsula lock 4. House at Lock 38, c. 1875 5. Modern view of house at Lock 38 6. Workers repairing the canal 7. Wash day on the canal 8. Canal boat family Putting It All Together: Activities 1. Life on the Ohio & Erie Canal 2. The Effects of Transportation on Daily Life 3. The Importance of Transportation Systems Supplementary Resources About This Lesson The lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file, "Ohio & Erie Canal," and park documents. The Ohio & Erie Canal was written by Deborah Ayers, former Park Ranger at Cuyahoga Valley National Park. The lesson was edited by Fay Metcalf, education consultant, and the Teaching with Historic Places staff. Where it fits into the curriculum Topics: The lesson could be used in teaching units on transportation or the economic development of the western frontier in the early-to-mid 1800s. Students will practice the skills of observation, analysis, research, and writing. Time period: 19th century. Objectives for students 1) To describe the construction of the Ohio & Erie Canal. 2) To compare the economy of Ohio before and after the completion of the canal system. 3) To identify industries that were made possible by the construction of the Ohio & Erie Canal. 4) To analyze the development of transportation routes in their own community and determine how these routes affected their local economy. Materials for students The materials listed below either can be used directly on the computer or can be printed out, photocopied, and distributed to students. 1) one map of the canal system; 2) two readings about the construction and operation of the canal and its impact on Ohio; 3) two diagrams of a canal cross section and parts of a lock gate; 4) six photos, both historical and modern, of different aspects of the Ohio & Erie Canal. 3 6 Visiting the site The Ohio & Erie Canal extended 308 miles from north to south through the east- central parts of Ohio. One of the longest remaining watered sections of the canal runs through the National Park Service's Cuyahoga Valley National Park. The Canal Visitor Center is located on Canal Road in Valley View, Ohio. Cuyahoga Valley National Park is open daily, dawn to dusk. All visitor centers are closed January 1, Thanksgiving Day, and December 25. For additional information, write the Superintendent, Cyuahoga Valley National Park, 15610 Vaughn Road, Brecksville, OH 44141, or visit the park's web site at http://www.nps.gov/cuva/ 7 4 How to Use the Inquiry Question Begin each lesson by asking students to discuss possible answers to the inquiry question that accompanies the Getting Started image. To facilitate a whole class discussion, you may want to print the page and use it to make an overhead transparency. The purpose of the exercise is to engage students' interest in the lesson's topic by raising questions that can be answered as they complete the lesson. Rather than serving merely as illustrations for the text, images are documents that play an integral role in helping students achieve the lesson's objectives. To assist students in learning how to "read" visual materials, you may want to begin this section by having them complete the Photo Analysis Worksheet for one or more of the photos. The worksheet is appropriate for analyzing both historical and modern photographs and will help students develop a valuable skill. 69 Photo Analysis Worksheet Step 1: Examine the photograph for 10 seconds. How would you describe the photograph? Step 2: Divide the photograph into quadrants and study each section individually. What details--such as people, objects, activities--do you notice? Step 3: What other information--such as time period, location, season, reason photo was taken--can you gather from the photo? Step 4: How would you revise your first description of the photo using the information noted in Steps 2 and 3? Step 5: What questions do you have about the photograph? How might you find answers to these questions? 0 7 Setting the Stage In the 1820s, Ohio was one of the poorest states in the Union.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio:And.Erie Canal- ■ HAER No
    Ohio:and.Erie Canal- ■ HAER No. OH-59 Links .Lake Erie at Cleveland Hfie-t with the Ohio River at Portsmouth Peninsula Vicinity Summit County Ohio 71- PE:N,V. PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 0^ 11- HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD OHIO AND ERIE CANAL: SELECTED STRUCTURES IN THE CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA HAER NO. OH-59 Location: Lock No. 39 - West side of Canal Road, 3400 feet north of Stone Road, Valley View Ohio UTM: 17.447740.4582065 Cleveland South Quadrangle Lock No. 38 - Hillside and Canal Roads, Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.448740.4580065 Northfield Quadrangle Tinkers Creek Aqueduct - Canal Road and Tinkers Creek Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.449060.4579210 Northfield Quadrangle Lock No. 37 - Canal and Fitzwater roads, Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.450040.4578320 Northfield Quadrangle Lock No. 29 and Peninsula Aqueduct - at Cuyahoga River 600 feet north of State Route 303, Peninsula, Ohio UTM: 17.453860.4565640 Date of Construction: 1825-27; Reconstructed 1905-06 Present Owner: State of Ohio Department of Public Works 65 South Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Present Use: None, except Tinkers Creek Aqueduct, which is still in use. Significance: The Ohio and Erie Canal, linking Lake Erie at Cleveland with the Ohio River at Portsmouth, Ohio, was completed in 1832. The 308-mile inland waterway laid the foundation for Ohio's agricultural, industrial, commercial, and political growth. That section of canal between Akron and Cleveland was the first to open in 1827 there, the rapid drop in elevation -- nearly 400 feet in 38 miles -- required the construction of 44 locks.
    [Show full text]
  • Apples Abound
    APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy John Henris May, 2009 APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 John Henris Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ ____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Kevin Kern Dr. Michael M. Sheng ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Lesley J. Gordon Dr. Chand Midha ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Kim M. Gruenwald Dr. George R. Newkome ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Date Dr. Elizabeth Mancke ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Randy Mitchell ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Gregory Wilson ii ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that apple cultivation was invariably intertwined with, and shaped by, the seemingly discordant threads of scientific agricultural specialization, emigration, urbanization, sectionalism, moral reform, and regional identity in New England and Ohio prior to the American Civil War. As the temperance cause gained momentum during the 1820s many farmers abandoned their cider trees and transitioned to the cultivation of grafted winter apples in New England. In turn agricultural writers used
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Erie Canal: the Evolution of a Name, 1825-1996
    The Ohio & Erie Canal: The Evolution of a Name, 1825-1996 By Sam Tamburro Historian Cuyahoga Valley National Park 17 June 2002 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................3 Background .................................................................................................................................3 Personal Accounts of Residents of Northeast Ohio ......................................................................6 Newspaper Articles and Advertisements .....................................................................................9 Maps ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Art, Photography, and Postcards ................................................................................................ 21 Ohio and Erie Canal Historiography .......................................................................................... 26 2 Executive Summary For most transportation systems, there is an official name and a vernacular, common name for everyday use. For example, the official, incorporated name of Interstate 80 is the “James W. Shocknessy Ohio Turnpike;” however, in day-to-day parlance and other media, it is simply known as the “Ohio Turnpike” or “I-80.” There are numerous examples of common names for nineteenth-century railroads, such as the “Nickel Plate Road” for the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio-Erie Canal Report May, 2013 I
    Ohio-Erie Canal Report i May, 2013 Executive Summary Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern Species Common Name This assessment characterizes the likelihood that a viable Hypophthalmichthys aquatic pathway exists at the Ohio-Erie Canal at Long molitrix silver carp Lake location, and that it would allow transfer of aquatic Hypophthalmichthys nobilis bighead carp nuisance species (ANS) between the Great Lakes and Mylopharyngodon piceus black carp Mississippi Rivers Basins. This was accomplished by Channa argus northern snakehead evaluating the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the site based on readily available information, Alosa chrysochloris skipjack herring and conducting a species-specific assessment of the abilities of potential ANS to arrive at the pathway ANS movement from the Great Lakes Basin into the and cross into the adjacent basin. A couple of the key Mississippi River Basin nearly impossible. features of the Ohio-Erie Canal pathway are the Long Lake Feeder Gates and Long Lake Flood Gates that are As a result of this high rating for the probability of an adjacent to the Ohio-Erie Canal in Portage Lakes. These aquatic pathway existing at Ohio-Erie Canal, the are the locations where water is either diverted from likelihood of ANS transfer at this location was evaluated. Long Lake (which sits in the Mississippi River Basin) A total of five ANS were identified for a more focused into the Tuscarawas River through the Flood Gates or evaluation based on the biological requirements and from Long Lake into the Ohio-Erie Canal through the capabilities of each species. These species are listed in Feeder Gates.
    [Show full text]
  • A Green Shrouded Miracle the Administrative History of Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, Ohio
    A Green Shrouded Miracle: TOC Page 1 of 9 A Green Shrouded Miracle The Administrative History of Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, Ohio Special History Study Chapter 1: A Brief History of the Cuyahoga Valley The Cuyahoga River Valley is biologically unique--a “botanical crossroads” situated in the transition zone between the Central Lowlands to the west and the Appalachian Plateau to the east. The valley serves as a natural dividing line between these eastern mountain and western prairie physiographic provinces. Statement for Management, 1977 The Cuyahoga River of northeast Ohio originates from two sources. The river’s east branch emanates from a spring near Montville while the west branch begins near Chardon, both in Geauga County, Ohio. The branches combine near Burton. The river proceeds south through the Allegheny Plateau to present-day Akron where it unites with the Little Cuyahoga River. It is at Akron that the aforementioned watershed plateau divides the land north and south: for while the Cuyahoga River turns to the north and empties into Lake Erie, the Tuscarawas River, five miles distant from Akron, flows south to the Ohio River, thence to the mighty Mississippi and the Gulf of Mexico. The valley between Akron and Cleveland through which the Cuyahoga River flows consists of Devonian and Mississippian shales and Mississippian and Pennsylvanian sandstones. When the glacier receded (13,000 B.C.), coarse debris, including sand, gravel and clay, remained in a half-mile-wide valley marked with unstable slopes from 200 to 400 feet high. Within this valley, the meandering Cuyahoga River, fed by Furnace Run, Yellow Creek, Dickerson Run, Chippewa Creek, Salt Run, Brandywine Creek, and Tinkers Creek tributaries, cut into the bedrock and varied from 35 to 85 feet wide and a depth of from a few inches to five feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development, Land Use, and the System of Cities in Northwest Ohio During the Nineteenth Century
    CREATING CONNECTIONS: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LAND USE, AND THE SYSTEM OF CITIES IN NORTHWEST OHIO DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Matthew D. Bloom A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2009 Committee: Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor David Shoemaker Graduate Faculty Representative Edmund J. Danziger, Jr. Timothy F. Messer-Kruse © 2009 Matthew D. Bloom All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor Examining how economics, geography, and politics interacted in the expansion and economic changes within the United States, this dissertation investigated the symbiotic relationships and their qualities among the economic transformations of an urban area and its surrounding hinterland throughout the nineteenth century. Specifically, it investigated how the economic and population changes within Toledo, Ohio, molded the development of agricultural hinterlands and how the condition and settlement of the surrounding rural areas shaped the economic changes of Toledo. The quality of transportation connections among Toledo and other nascent towns, market interactions among residents, and the relationships between land quality and usage provided for symbiotic economic development of urban areas and rural hinterlands. The ability to use certain transportation infrastructures, the condition of land, and the availability of natural resources determined the type, quantity, and strength of market connections among people, which influenced the amount and forms of economic change for the area. Conclusions of this study were drawn from analyzing census records, newspaper advertisements and editorials, agricultural reports, and business records and literature. This research introduced a new paradigm of regional economic change named the “subregional model” which included a hub, local economic centers, small villages and farms, and links of various qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's Food Systems – Farms at the Heart of It
    Crossroads Resource Center 7415 Humboldt Ave. S. / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 / 612.869.8664 [email protected] www.crcworks.org Tools for Community Self-determination Ohio’s Food Systems – Farms At The Heart Of It All By Ken Meter Crossroads Resource Center March 30, 2011 Commissioned by the University of Toledo Urban Affairs Center with funds from the Ohio Department of Agriculture Ohio’s Food Systems — Farms at the Heart of It All — Ken Meter, March, 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................4 A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH.......................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 11 ELEMENTS OF THE FOOD AND FARM ECONOMY OF OHIO ................................................. 15 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FOOD IN OHIO........................................................................................... 18 RECENT TRENDS IN OHIO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ..........................................................35 EMERGING FOOD BUSINESS CLUSTERS ......................................................................................58 ATHENS SETS THE TONE .............................................................................................................................................. 58 FRESH MILK BUILDS CLUSTERS OF BUSINESSES........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OHFOOD: an Ohio Food Industries Input-Output Model (Year 2010, Version 13.0, June 2012)
    OHFOOD: An Ohio Food Industries Input-Output Model (Year 2010, Version 13.0, June 2012) by Thomas L. Sporleder1 Abstract OHFOOD, an acronym for Ohio food, is a sophisticated input-output model. The model is designed specifically to capture the interdependencies and linkages among various sectors and industries composing the complex economy of Ohio. The input-output model of Ohio's economy also maintains substantial detail on the food and agricultural sectors, referred to as the agrifood supply chain. The interindustry model describes the linkages among various sectors of the economy and is designed specifically to provide estimates of the economic importance of the food and agriculture-related cluster, along with the general manufacturing and service sectors, of the Ohio economy. In addition, OHFOOD provides several types of economic multipliers for detailed food and agriculture-related sectors of the economy. This abstract is a brief overview of the importance of food and agriculture to the state's economy, based on the interindustry model. The analysis indicates that for 2010 the food and agricultural cluster of Ohio's economy contributed 11.7 percent of the output, added 10.7 percent to Ohio’s gross state product, and accounted for 14.0 percent of the total employment in the Ohio economy. The agrifood cluster of the Ohio economy accounts for 1 of every 7 jobs in Ohio. Of these, over 93,000 jobs are in production agriculture with over an additional 59,000 just in food processing. In 2010, the Ohio economy generated a gross state product (GSP) of $477.7 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's Food Systems – Farms at the Heart of It
    Crossroads Resource Center 7415 Humboldt Ave. S. / Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 / 612.869.8664 [email protected] www.crcworks.org Tools for Community Self-determination EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ONLY Ohio’s Food Systems – Farms At The Heart Of It All By Ken Meter Crossroads Resource Center March 30, 2011 Commissioned by the University of Toledo Urban Affairs Center with funds from the Ohio Department of Agriculture Ohio’s Food Systems — Farms at the Heart of It All — Ken Meter, March, 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 4 A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH................................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 11 ELEMENTS OF THE FOOD AND FARM ECONOMY OF OHIO ......................................................... 15 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FOOD IN OHIO..................................................................................................... 18 RECENT TRENDS IN OHIO FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ................................................................... 35 EMERGING FOOD BUSINESS CLUSTERS............................................................................................... 58 ATHENS SETS THE TONE..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio & Erie Canalway: Connectivity, Community, Culture
    2 0 1 1 OHIO & ERIE CANALWAY: CONNECTIVITY, COMMUNITY, CULTURE OHIO & ERIE CANALWAY: CONNECTIVITY, COMMUNITY, CULTURE Prepared by the 2011 Maxine Levin College of Urban Affairs Planning Capstone Studio class under the direction of Dr. Sugie Lee, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University and Mr. James Kastelic, Senior Park Planner, Cleveland Metroparks. Class Members Jonathan Baughman Hannah Belsito Richard Burns Cassandra Gaffney Stephen Gage Katherine Kowalczyk Zachary Mau Tanja McCoy Michael McGarry Kimberly Merik Delilah Onofrey Trevor Rutti Coral Troxell Sherry Tulk John Vitou OHIO & ERIE CANALWAY: CONNECTIVITY, COMMUNITY, CULTURE T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 BOUNDARY & ORGANIZATIONAL LANDSCAPE 3 IMPACT ANALYSIS 9 STRATEGIC PLAN 59 MARKETING & TOURISM PROPOSAL 111 CONCLUSION 125 APPENDIX & REFERENCES 126 OHIO & ERIE CANALWAY: CONNECTIVITY, COMMUNITY, CULTURE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This comprehensive document is Cleveland State University‘s Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Master of Urban Planning, Design & Development Capstone Class of 2011‘s, compilation of research, analysis and recommendations for the Ohio & Erie Canalway National Heritage Area. As a group we examined the Heritage Area from conception, designation, progressive establishment and growth and provide our resulting vision and strategic recommendations to expand and propel the corridor to greater capacity of enhancement, success and regionalization. The accomplishments of the Ohio & Erie Canalway Association, Ohio Canal Corridor and Ohio & Erie Canalway Coalition, (Canalway Organizations), various other entities, visioning partners and ensuing forged partnerships are numerous and inspiring. These partners are leading the Heritage Area to establish a renewed identity, to regeneration of Northeast Ohio cities and towns and proliferation of the tourism industry, utilizing the canal legacy of regional and national prominence.
    [Show full text]
  • American Transmission Systems, Incorporated a Firstenergy Company
    AMERICAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED A FIRSTENERGY COMPANY CONSTRUCTION NOTICE JUNIPER-NEWBURGH, JUNIPER-JENNINGS, AND JUNIPER-PLEASANT VALLEY 138 kV TRANSMISSION LINES STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OPSB CASE NO.: 17-2013-EL-BNR September 29, 2017 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 CONSTRUCTION NOTICE JUNIPER-NEWBURGH, JUNIPER-JENNINGS, AND JUNIPER-PLEASANT VALLEY 138 kV TRANSMISSION LINE STRUCTURE REPLACMENT PROJECT The following information is being provided in accordance with the procedures in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 4906-6 for the application and review of Accelerated Certificate Applications. Based upon the requirements found in Appendix A to OAC Rule 4906- 1-01, this Project qualifies for submittal to the Ohio Power Siting Board (“Board”) as a Construction Notice application. 4906-6-05: ACCELERATED APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 4906-6-05: Name and Reference Number Name of Project: Juniper-Newburgh, Juniper-Jennings, and Juniper-Pleasant Valley 138 kV Transmission Lines Structure Replacement Project (“Project”). 4906-6-05 (B)(1): Brief Description of the Project In this Project, American Transmission Systems, Incorporated (“ATSI”), a FirstEnergy company, is proposing to replace two (2) existing steel lattice structures due to localized erosion along Tinker’s Creek in the Village of Valley View, Cuyahoga County Ohio. Existing steel lattice tower #2914, supporting the Juniper-Newburgh & Juniper-Jennings 138 kV Transmission Lines, and existing steel lattice tower #2218, supporting the Juniper-Pleasant Valley 138 kV Transmission Lines, will be replaced with two (2) steel monopole structures set with concrete foundations. Recently, the geomorphology of Tinker’s Creek has changed significantly with the water channel shifting approximately 125-feet westward towards the existing steel lattice structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy of Ohio Grew More Slowly Than That of the United States During 1987-2001
    Ohio’s Economy Economy of Ohio Grew More Slowly Than That of the United States during 1987-2001 Inflation-Adjusted Gross State Product 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% % change from year earlier -2% 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 U.S. GDP Ohio GSP Great Lakes States 2001 Gross State Product (GSP) Billions of State National Rank Current Dollars Illinois $475.5 5 Ohio $373.7 7 Michigan $320.5 9 Indiana $189.9 16 Wisconsin $177.4 20 · Ohio’s 2001 gross state product (latest available) of $373.7 billion made it the 2nd largest economy in the Great Lakes region, behind Illinois, and 7th largest in the United States. In comparison with the gross domestic product of the United States and other countries, Ohio’s economy ranked 15th largest. · During the period from 1986 through 2001, Ohio’s nominal GSP grew by 103%, or 4.8% annually (average annual compounded growth rate). U.S. nominal GDP grew by 133%, or 5.8% annually. Ohio’s share of national economic activity fell to 3.7% in 2001 from 4.2% 15 years earlier. The Great Lakes region's GSP grew by 111%, or 5.1% annually. · Over the 1986-2001 period, Ohio’s real (inflation-adjusted) GSP grew by 44%, or 2.5% annually. U.S. real GDP grew by 60%, or 3.2% annually. The Great Lakes region's GSP grew by 50%, or 2.7% annually. 6 Ohio Legislative Service Commission Ohio’s Economy Ohio Income Per Person Less Than U.S.
    [Show full text]