DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 1:13-Cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 215

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 1:13-Cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 215 Case 1:13-cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 215 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM – against – AND ORDER ON SENTENCING D.W., 13-CR-173 Defendant. Appearances United States Robert L. Capers United States Attorney, E.D.N.Y. By: Erik David Paulsen U.S. Attorney’s Office, E.D.N.Y. 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11201 Defendant Deirdre Dionysia Von Dornum Douglas G. Morris Samuel Jacobson Federal Defenders of New York One Pierrepont Plaza 16th floor Brooklyn, NY 11201 Amicus Lambda Legal Defense & Education Hayley Gorenberg Fund, Inc.; National Center for Lambda Legal Defense & Education Lesbian Rights; National Center for Fund, Inc. Transgender Equality; and the 120 Wall Street Sylvia Rivera Law Project 19th Floor New York, NY 10005 Case 1:13-cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 215 PageID #: <pageID> Amicus Washington Lawyers’ Committee Brandon W Duke for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Winston & Strawn 1111 Louisiana Street, 25th Floor Houston, TX 77002 Benjamin Sokoly Jeffrey Amato Jonathan McCoy Sean Anderson Winston & Strawn LLP 200 Park Avenue NY, NY 10002 Case 1:13-cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 215 PageID #: <pageID> JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 II. Factual Background........................................................................................................... 6 A. Abuse and Neglect by Biological Parents......................................................................... 6 B. Abuse and Trauma in First Foster Family ...................................................................... 6 C. Abuse and Trauma in Second Foster Family .................................................................. 8 D. Adoption.............................................................................................................................. 9 E. Sexual History and Addiction to Child Pornography .................................................. 11 F. State Incarceration........................................................................................................... 12 1. Repeated Rape .............................................................................................................. 12 2. Mental Health and Suicide Attempts ......................................................................... 13 G. Release from State Custody ......................................................................................... 13 III. Instant Offenses ................................................................................................................ 17 A. FBI Investigation .............................................................................................................. 17 1. Possession of Child Pornography................................................................................ 18 2. Fictitious Bus Company ............................................................................................... 18 B. Arrest ................................................................................................................................ 21 C. Sexual Exploitation of a Child ........................................................................................ 21 D. Plea Negotiations and Trial Preparation ....................................................................... 22 E. Guilty Plea ........................................................................................................................ 23 F. Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Incarceration ............................................. 23 1. Risk of Suicide .............................................................................................................. 23 2. Disciplinary Issues ........................................................................................................ 26 3. Lack of Family Support ............................................................................................... 28 G. Sentencing ..................................................................................................................... 30 1. Offense Level, Category, and Sentencing Guidelines Range ................................... 30 2. Victim Impact ............................................................................................................... 30 3. Medical and Psychological Evaluations ..................................................................... 31 a) Dr. Richard B. Krueger, M.D. ................................................................................. 32 b) Dr. Robert Prentky, Ph.D. ....................................................................................... 37 c) Dr. Barry Rosenfeld, Ph.D. ...................................................................................... 41 4. Sentencing Hearing of June 2015 ................................................................................ 42 1 Case 1:13-cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 4 of 215 PageID #: <pageID> 5. Defendant’s July 2015 Letter to Court ....................................................................... 45 H. Evidentiary Hearings ................................................................................................... 46 1. Guilty Plea ..................................................................................................................... 47 2. Witness Testimony ....................................................................................................... 51 a) Medical Experts ........................................................................................................ 52 b) Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) Experts ....................................................................... 53 c) Additional Witnesses ................................................................................................ 57 I. Amicus Curiae Briefs ....................................................................................................... 59 IV. Sentencing Considerations .............................................................................................. 60 A. Risk of Harm to Defendant While in BOP Custody ..................................................... 62 1. Designation to Medium or High Security Facility ..................................................... 62 2. Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”) .................................................................... 68 a) BOP PREA Program Statement ............................................................................. 70 b) BOP PREA Intake Screening .................................................................................. 72 3. Limitations of PREA .................................................................................................... 76 4. Characteristics Rendering Defendant Highly Vulnerable ....................................... 78 a) Previous Sexual Victimization ................................................................................. 83 b) Sexual Orientation .................................................................................................... 84 c) Mental Illness ............................................................................................................ 85 d) Sex Offender Status .................................................................................................. 88 B. BOP’s Use of Solitary Confinement to Protect and Punish ......................................... 91 1. Special Housing Units (“SHUs”) ................................................................................. 94 a) Disciplinary Segregation .......................................................................................... 94 b) Administrative Detention ......................................................................................... 95 c) Protective Custody .................................................................................................... 97 d) BOP Tracking of Inmates in SHU......................................................................... 109 2. Lack of Alternatives to Protective Custody ............................................................. 112 a) Transfer to Different Housing Unit ...................................................................... 116 b) Transfer to Different Facility ................................................................................ 117 3. Effects of Solitary Confinement ................................................................................ 118 a) SHU Syndrome ....................................................................................................... 118 b) Effects on Vulnerable Inmates .............................................................................. 122 2 Case 1:13-cr-00173-JBW Document 160 Filed 07/28/16 Page 5 of 215 PageID #: <pageID> c) Post-SHU Syndrome ............................................................................................... 123 d) Destructive Effects of Isolation on Defendant ...................................................... 125 C. FMC Devens; BOP Program for Sex Offenders ......................................................... 125 1. Sex Offender Management Program (“SOMP”) ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation of LGBT Persons Version 2.0
    COUNTRY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2019 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) Morocco Situation of LGBT persons version 2.0 © 2019 The Danish Immigration Service The Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 2100 Copenhagen Denmark Phone: +45 35 36 66 00 newtodenmark.dk September 2019 All rights reserved to the Danish Immigration Service. The publication can be downloaded for free at newtodenmark.dk The Danish Immigration Service’s publications can be quoted with clear source reference. Front page photo: https://www.yabiladi.com/articles/details/63789/vers‐vague‐ migrants‐lgbt‐marocains.html MOROCCO - SITUATION OF LGBT PERSONS 2.0 List of Content Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................................................3 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Background: changes over time in norms and values ....................................................................... 8 2. Situation of LGBT persons in Morocco ............................................................................................. 9 2.1 The legislative framework relating to sexuality ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland
    LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland FULL REPORT Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann August 2020 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Page is blank intentionally 2 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Acknowledgements Project team: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Project coordination: Fernando Lannes Fernandes University of Dundee Project funder: Barrow Cadbury Trust Report authors: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Report contributors: Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Report proofreading: Louise Galluzzo Report design: Kristi Louise Herd How to cite this report Fernandes, FL, Kaufmann, B & Kaufmann, K 2020, LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland (Full Report). University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. https://doi.org/10.20933/100001165 3 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland We would like to thank every participant in this project who took time to be interviewed and offered us an insight into their life experiences, both as people in custody and the prison staff. We also want to thank the prison services in Scotland (Scottish Prison Service) and England (Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services) who gave us permission to carry out interviews in prisons. In every prison we visited, we were made to feel very welcome, and were heartened by the openness of Scottish and English prisons to independent research. Such openness is, indeed, very important to the democratic process and public transparency, and we are grateful to all gatekeepers who facilitated our access to people in prisons and provided a safe environment that ensured the confidentiality of the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 1
    Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 1 Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2 Frequently Asked Questions Bent Bars Project December 2020 The Bent Bars Project is a letter-writing and solidarity project for LGBTQ+ prisoners in Britain. We provide direct support to LGBTQ+ prisoners, build community across prison walls, and raise public awareness about LGBTQ+ prison issues. We are a small, completely volunteer-run organisation which has been running since 2009. Bent Bars Project PO Box 66754 London WC1A 9BF www.bentbarsproject.org Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 3 Introduction The purpose of this info sheet is to answer common questions and provide factual information about the situation of trans and non-binary people in prison in the UK.1 This information sheet is one of three and we encourage you to read all of them. Trans and gender non-conforming people face high levels of discrimination, inequality and social exclusion. This can result in targeted policing, criminalisation and imprisonment. When in prison, trans and gender non-conforming people are often subject to increased isolation, harassment, violence and denial of health care. This is especially the case for trans people in poverty, trans people of colour, those with disabilities and those with little family or community support. The imprisonment of trans and gender non-conforming people is not a new issue, but recently there has been an increase in public interest around trans prisoners. Greater awareness and informed discussion is to be welcomed. However, as with much reporting of prison-related issues in general, a lot of media coverage around trans prisoners has been characterised by sensationalist reporting, misleading claims, and decontextualised statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • An Epidemic of Homelessness
    LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER YOUTH An Epidemic of Homelessness by Nicholas Ray with chapters contributed by Colby Berger, Waltham House, Waltham, Mass. Susan Boyle, Urban Peak, Denver, Colo. Mary Jo Callan and Mia White, Ozone House, Ann Arbor, Mich. Grace McCelland, Ruth Ellis Center, Detroit, Mich. Theresa Nolan, Green Chimneys, New York, N.Y. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute National Coalition for the Homeless The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute is a think tank dedicated to research, policy analysis and strategy development to advance greater understanding and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. Washington, DC Cambridge, MA 1325 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 600 1151 Massachusetts Avenue Washington, DC 20005-4171 Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel 202 393 5177 Tel 617 492 6393 Fax 202 393 2241 Fax 617 492 0175 New York, NY Miami, FL 80 Maiden Lane, Suite 1504 3510 Biscayne Blvd Suite 206 New York, NY 10038 Miami, FL 33137 Tel 212 604 9830 Tel 305 571 1924 Fax 212 604 9831 Fax 305 571 7298 Los Angeles, CA Minneapolis, MN 8704 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 200 810 West 31st Street West Hollywood, CA 90069 Mineeapolis, MN 55408 Tel 310 855 7380 Tel/Fax 612 821 4397 Fax 310 358 9415 [email protected] www.thetaskforce.org National Coalition for the Homeless www.nationalhomeless.org © 2006 The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute When referencing this document, we recommend the following citation: Ray, N. (2006). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth: An epidemic of homelessness. New York: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute and the National Coalition for the Homeless.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice
    Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative ii GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice Table of Contents � v Acknowledgements vii Preface: Macarena Sáez xi Introduction: Juan E. Méndez xv Foreword: Dubravka Šimonović 1 I. Gender-Based Violence: State Responsibility 3 The Vital Voices Justice Institute: Helping States Combat Gender-Based Violence Gigi Scoles and Anupama Selvam 19 Reparations for Sexual and Other Gender-Based Violence Carla Ferstman 33 How Non-State Torture is Gendered and Invisibilized: Canada’s Non-Compliance with the Committee Against Torture's Recommendations Jackie Jones, Jeanne Sarson, and Linda MacDonald 57 The Importance of Investigating Torture Against Women and Girls by Non-State Actors: Applicable Legal Standards from International Human Rights Law Teresa Fernández Paredes 87 II. Gender and Sexuality as the Basis for Specific Harms 89 Murdered in the Name of “Honor” Aisha K. Gill 105 Female Genital Mutilation as a Form of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment": Intersections with the Migration Context Els Leye and Ino Kehrer 123 Pregnancy and Virginity Testing in Educational Settings and the Torture and Other Ill-Treatment Framework Esther Major 139 Forced Contraception as a Means of Torture Christie J. Edwards 161 The Humanisation of Women: A Work in Progress Purna Sen 183 Gendering the Lens: Critical Reflections on Gender, Hospitality and Torture Mauro Cabral Grinspan and Morgan Carpenter iii iv GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice 197 III.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Race Theory Approach to the Prison Rape Elimination Act
    Medina & Nguyen Acknowledged but Ignored: A Critical Race Theory Approach to the Prison Rape Elimination Act Kevin Medina Brian Nguyen I was dehuman[ized] by the lack of empathy prison officials have towards victims of sexual assault, potential victims, inmate[‘s] safety in general. Inmates are looked at and treated as subhuman across the board. If an inci- dent can be covered, it will be. If it can be ignored, it will be. —As cited in No Escape, Male Rape in US Prisons (2011). Why is there a prison rape epidemic? In The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander argues that the criminal jus- tice system has essentially become the United States’ new racial caste system. Through the systematic persecution and prosecution of mainly black bodies, beginning with the Reagan administration’s supposed “War on Drugs,” the prison population exploded starting in the 1980s, (over) filling prisons with nonwhites. This system of criminalizing racial minorities results from a distinct inequality of criminalization: despite proportional rates of drug use across ethnicities, African Americans see higher incarceration rates of any other ethnicity and experience harsher punishments for similar violations.1 Beyond the war on drugs, other historically disenfranchised communities, including individuals of Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latina/o descent, immigrants, Native Americans, and LGBT individuals are victimized as the result of overt and more subtle collusion of systematic practices of racism, classism, transphobia, © 2018 Kevin Medina & Brian Nguyen. All Rights
    [Show full text]
  • CONFINEMENT at the MARGINS: PRELIMINARY NOTES on TRANSGENDER PRISONERS in INDIA Deekshitha Ganesan & Saumya Dadoo*
    NUJS Law Review 13 NUJS L. Rev. 3 (2020) CONFINEMENT AT THE MARGINS: PRELIMINARY NOTES ON TRANSGENDER PRISONERS IN INDIA Deekshitha Ganesan & Saumya Dadoo* Transgender persons in India have historically been subject to violence and erasure through laws that have criminalised their lives and livelihoods. Despite recent legal and judicial developments that have purported to correct these historical wrongs, transgender persons’ relationship with the penal state continues to be fraught, evident in laws and practices that either target them, or address them as a distinct category, or neglect them entirely. One such site of legal and policy exclusion is a space that is itself relegated to the peripheries of public thought – the prison. Transgender persons in prison are likely to face particular harms on the basis of their gender identity that are compounded by harms that characterise the conditions of confinement. This paper is a preliminary inquiry into the status of transgender persons in Indian prisons. It demonstrates that while transgender persons are policed, criminalised, and made ‘hyper-visible’ in public spaces, they are ‘invisible’ in laws, rules, and practices that are framed for prison management. Further, it argues that centring the self-narratives of transgender prisoners is a necessary first step in understanding their experiences of prison and developing legal and policy responses. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT+ People in Prisons – Full Report
    LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland FULL REPORT Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann August 2020 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Page is blank intentionally 2 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Acknowledgements Project team: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Project coordination: Fernando Lannes Fernandes University of Dundee Project funder: Barrow Cadbury Trust Report authors: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Report contributors: Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Report proofreading: Louise Galluzzo Report design: Kristi Louise Herd How to cite this report Fernandes, FL, Kaufmann, B & Kaufmann, K 2020, LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland (Full Report). University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. https://doi.org/10.20933/100001165 3 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland We would like to thank every participant in this project who took time to be interviewed and offered us an insight into their life experiences, both as people in custody and the prison staff. We also want to thank the prison services in Scotland (Scottish Prison Service) and England (Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services) who gave us permission to carry out interviews in prisons. In every prison we visited, we were made to feel very welcome, and were heartened by the openness of Scottish and English prisons to independent research. Such openness is, indeed, very important to the democratic process and public transparency, and we are grateful to all gatekeepers who facilitated our access to people in prisons and provided a safe environment that ensured the confidentiality of the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Out on the Inside. the Rights, Experiences and Needs of LGBT
    Out on the Inside The Rights, Experiences and Needs of LGBT People in Prison February 2016 IPRTThe PositionIrish Penal Reform Paper Trust (IPRT) on is Ireland’s leading non-governmental organisation Planningcampaigning forthe the rightsFuture of everyone of in Irishthe penal system,Prisons with prison as a last resort. IPRT is committed to reducing imprisonment and the progressive reform of the penal system based on lineevidence-led two here policies. IPRT works to achieve its goals through research, raising awareness, and building alliances. This report was written by Dr Nicola Carr, Dr Siobhán McAlister and Dr Tanya Serisier, and was supported by The Community Foundation for Ireland. Acknowledgements Irish Penal Reform Trust MACRO Building, 1 Green Street, Dublin 7, Ireland T: +353 (0)1 874 1400 E: [email protected] W: www.iprt.ie Copyright © Irish Penal Reform Trust, 2016 ISBN: 978-0-9573037-7-5 July 2009 Out on the Inside –Page 1 Acknowledgements This report is based on research commissioned by the IPRT and conducted by Dr Nicola Carr, Dr Siobhán McAlister and Dr Tanya Serisier of Queen’s University Belfast. IPRT is very grateful to the Community Foundation of Ireland for supporting this research. The authors and IPRT would like to thank the interviewees and focus group participants for sharing their experiences, without which the report would not have been possible. We would also like to thank all of those who facilitated this research, including statutory bodies and NGOs working within prisons and the LGBT sector. Finally, we would like to thank Seamus Taylor, NUI Maynooth for providing helpful comments on earlier drafts of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Prison Law Summer 2018 Job Search Guide
    last updated Oct. 13, 2017 UCLA Prison Law Summer 2018 Job Search Guide Organizations Description Contact Website Interested applicants should email a resume, The Abolitionist Law Center offers legal internships year-round to law students who cover letter, legal writing want to work with us in defending the human rights of prisoners in Pennsylvania. Our sample (no more than 5 http://abolitionistla Abolitionist Law Center casework includes litigation challenging solitary confinement and prison censorship, pages), and two wcenter.org/ exposure to toxic coal waste at SCI Fayette, juvenile life without parole, and other references to projects we are involved in or developing. info@abolitionistlawcent er.org. This is one of the premier prisoners' rights litigation shops in the country. They are Send CV, writing https://www.aclu.or ACLU National Prison involved in prisoner litigation nationwide. They have filled their summer slots for 2018, sample, and references g/prisoners- Project (Washington, but are actively soliciting applications for full-time externships for both spring and fall to Eric Balaban at rights/aclu-national- D.C.) semesters 2018. [email protected] prison-project ACLU Disability Rights https://www.aclu.or Program (San Francisco, g/issues/disability- CA) rights As integral members of the ACLU of Alaska’s legal team, our clerks gain practical experience through defending and expanding Alaskans’ civil liberties and constitutional rights. Law clerks may work on current litigation, legislative advocacy, policy research, and public education. While the ACLU of Alaska is a multi-issue organization, improving To apply, please email a prison conditions and advocating on behalf of prisoners are significant components of resume, cover letter, our work.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT People in Azerbaijan
    Forced Out: LGBT People in Azerbaijan Report on ILGA-Europe/COC fact-finding mission Written by Dennis van der Veur Forced Out: LGBT People in Azerbaijan Report on ILGA-Europe/ COC fact-finding mission August 2007 Written by Dennis van der Veur Table of content Introduction 6 Chapter 1 8 Country profile 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Political Situation 9 1.3 Economic Situation 11 1.4 Human Rights Situation 12 1.5 Civil Society in Azerbaijan 13 Chapter 2 16 Situation for LGBT Community in Azerbaijan 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 The ‘Community’ of LGBT in Azerbaijan 18 2.3 Psychological Aspects 19 2.4 Coming Out 20 2.5 Lesbian and Bisexual Women 20 2.6 The ‘Gays on Tbilisi Avenue’ 21 2.7 The Legal Position of LGBT People in Azerbaijan 24 2.8 Political Discourse 30 2.9 Media 30 2.10 Law Enforcement and Authorities 32 2.11 Initiative Groups/LGBT Organisations/ Freedom of Association and Assembly 34 2.12 Response of International Organisations 35 2.13 Prison and Army 36 2.14 Health Aspects (including HIV/ AIDS) 36 Chapter 3 42 Concluding Remarks and Recommendations 42 Annex 1 – Newspaper and Academic Articles (English translations) 48 Annex 2 – Websites 70 Annex 3 – Bibliography 71 6 Report of a Fact-Finding Mission to the Republic of Azerbaijan Introduction This report focuses on the situation of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) people in Azerbaijan. The report is based on information gathered before, during and after a fact-finding mission in January 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Broken Criminal Justice System Fails Lgbt People
    UNJUST: HOW THE BROKEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FAILS LGBT PEOPLE Condensed Version February 2016 Authors Partners This report was authored by: This report was developed in partnership with: 2 Center for American Progress Advancement Project The Center for American Progress (CAP) is a think tank Advancement Project is a next generation, multi- dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through racial civil rights organization. Rooted in the great ideas and action. CAP combines bold policy ideas with human rights struggles for equality and justice, we a modern communications platform to help shape the exist to fulfill America’s promise of a caring, inclusive national debate. CAP is designed to provide long-term and just democracy. We use innovative tools and leadership and support to the progressive movement. strategies to strengthen social movements and CAP’s policy experts cover a wide range of issue areas, achieve high impact policy change. Learn more at and often work across disciplines to tackle complex, www.advancementproject.org. interrelated issues such as national security, energy, and climate change. Forward Together Forward Together is a multi-racial, multi-issue org- Movement Advancement Project anization that is changing how we think, feel, act, The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an and make policy about families. Whether chosen or independent think tank that provides rigorous biological, we work to ensure that all families have research, insight, and analysis that help speed the power and resources they need to thrive. We work equality for LGBT people. MAP works collaboratively at the intersections of race, gender, and sexuality— with LGBT organizations, advocates and funders, and find ways to shift our culture and policy in the providing information, analysis and resources that areas of reproductive justice, economic justice, and help coordinate and strengthen efforts for maximum ending mass incarceration.
    [Show full text]