DOCSLIB.ORG

Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative ii GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice Table of Contents � v Acknowledgements vii Preface: Macarena Sáez xi Introduction: Juan E. Méndez xv Foreword: Dubravka Šimonović 1 I. Gender-Based Violence: State Responsibility 3 The Vital Voices Justice Institute: Helping States Combat Gender-Based Violence Gigi Scoles and Anupama Selvam 19 Reparations for Sexual and Other Gender-Based Violence Carla Ferstman 33 How Non-State Torture is Gendered and Invisibilized: Canada’s Non-Compliance with the Committee Against Torture's Recommendations Jackie Jones, Jeanne Sarson, and Linda MacDonald 57 The Importance of Investigating Torture Against Women and Girls by Non-State Actors: Applicable Legal Standards from International Human Rights Law Teresa Fernández Paredes 87 II. Gender and Sexuality as the Basis for Specific Harms 89 Murdered in the Name of “Honor” Aisha K. Gill 105 Female Genital Mutilation as a Form of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment": Intersections with the Migration Context Els Leye and Ino Kehrer 123 Pregnancy and Virginity Testing in Educational Settings and the Torture and Other Ill-Treatment Framework Esther Major 139 Forced Contraception as a Means of Torture Christie J. Edwards 161 The Humanisation of Women: A Work in Progress Purna Sen 183 Gendering the Lens: Critical Reflections on Gender, Hospitality and Torture Mauro Cabral Grinspan and Morgan Carpenter iii iv GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice 197 III. Gender, Sexuality, and Deprivation of Liberty 199 Crime and Multiple Punishments: The Vulnerability of LGBTI Persons in the Criminal Justice System Jean-Sébastien Blanc 217 Women in the Criminal Justice System and the Bangkok Rules Therese Rytter and Andrea Huber 239 Mothers Behind Bars: Reflecting on the Impact of Incarceration on Mothers and their Children Maria Eva Dorigo 257 Making the Global Local, and the Local Global: Lessons Learned Brenda V. Smith 263 IV. Healthcare and Reproductive Rights 265 Reproductive Rights Violations as Torture or Ill-Treatment Katherine Mayall, Onyema Afulukwe, and Katrine Thomasen 279 Torture and Ill-Treatment: Forced Sterilization and Criminalization of Self-Induced Abortion Cynthia Soohoo and Farah Diaz-Tello 295 V. Annex 297 Gender perspectives on torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment (A/HRC/31/57) Juan E. Méndez v Acknowledgments � This publication was made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation, to whom we express our deep appreciation for their generous support. The Center would also like to thank the Open Society Foundation Human Rights Initiative and the Oak Foundation for their support of the Anti- Torture Initiative. Many people have been involved in brining this volume to fruition over the past months. We are grateful to the more than 20 article authors who contributed their perspectives and expertise to expand upon the former United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan E. Méndez’s thematic report on torture and ill-treatment through a gender perspective. Their deep commit­ ment is inspiring and their important contributions have enriched the ongoing debates outlined in this work. Special thanks to the skilled editing team of Vidya Dindiyal, Ana Dionne-Lanier, Cynthia Park, Maleeha Riaz, Zuleika Rivera, and Christine Vlasic who reviewed all or part of the texts at various stages as well as their support of the Anti-Torture Initiative. A special thanks to Chase Dunn, and Imani Cherry for their assistance during final reviews of the articles. In addition, we would like to thank Monette Zard for her vital research and support in drafting the thematic report on the applicability of the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in international law to the unique experiences of women, girls, and lesbian, gay bisexual, transgender and intersex persons. We would also like to thank Bill Novak, Julie Ahalt, Lori Schulman, Dawn Winter-Haines, and HBP, Inc. for overseeing the layout and design of the publication; Cathy Prather, and Michael Scher of the WCL Finance Department; and Melissa del Aguila, Anastassia Fagan, and Sofia Auzmendi of WCL’s Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law, for their continued support and assistance. The Center is profoundly grateful to Andra Nicolescu, former Assistant Director of the ATI, for her leadership in launching this volume by selecting and reviewing the articles and coordinating and communication with the authors. Finally, the Center would like to thank Vanessa Drummond, Assistant Project Director of the ATI, for coordinating the editing team, reviewing articles, and liais­ ing with authors and publishers. This volume could not have been completed without their efforts. Finally, we would like to dedicate this book in memory of Khalid Khalid, beloved colleague and friend, who dedicated over twenty years of his life in service of American University Washington College of Law. His support for the Center and its work was steadfast and deeply appreciated. Disclaimer The ideas, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this volume are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of the American University Washington College of Law Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law, the United Nations, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, or the Oak Foundation. vi GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice This publication is intended to generate a broad discussion on the topic of gender and torture. For that reason, it may be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but it is not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Any changes to the text of this publication must be approved by the Anti-Torture Initiative of the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law of American University Washington College of Law. If any section is reproduced, due credit must be given to the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law's Anti- Torture Initiative and to this publication. Cover art by Aleksandra Jevtovic. Preface � I once asked a Guatemalan public defender how she knew when a woman’s murder was the result of gender-based violence and not a simple homicide. She showed me several pictures of women’s half or fully naked bodies exhibiting obvious signs of torture, mutilation, and violent sexual assault prior to their deaths. She said that was how women’s bodies were usually found. That was the difference between gender-based violence and simple homicide. Women’s bodies are often used as instruments to send messages of terror, or as instruments of pleasure, or as instru­ ments of experimentation. In all of these cases, gender-based violence is recognizable because of its profound denial of personhood. The common thread running through the collection of articles presented in this publication is that women’s bodies are still looked at and treated as instruments, or means to achieving a goal, rather than as autonomous individuals. Killing a body to end a life is different than killing a body to send a signal. In both cases, the person is refused her or his basic right to life, but in the latter, the person is a mark, a sign for others to see and use. The first chapter of this volume elaborates on the notion of gender-based violence, the need to incorporate a gender perspective in legal systems in general, and the responsibilities of States with regard to those at the margins of legal protections. Although gender-based violence has existed since the beginning of time, it has only entered the realm of human rights as a specific issue within the last decades. International human rights law, traditionally, has not protected women from the harms they have suffered as a result of being women. As with the rest of legal and political insti­ tutions, women have had to struggle for their experiences to be recognized. The invisibility of women’s harms has also included a lack of reparations with a gender perspective; if the suffering women have endured is not understood, its consequences cannot be adequately addressed. Owing to the inclusion of a gender perspective, human rights treaty bodies have started to include repa­ rations that put women, and not only their families or communities, at the center of their analyses. The new trends in international human rights are welcome by the international community, but they have not necessarily translated into substantive protection of women's and girl’s rights, and States must work to ensure that they carry through with their obligations to investigate incidents of gender-based violence and provide redress for victims. Chapter two examines specific forms of violence that women and girls experience throughout the world, including honor killings, female genital mutilation, pregnancy and virginity testing, and the use of forced contraception and addresses the need to advance the humanization of women’s rights. States have been reluctant to introduce laws opposing these forms of violence on grounds that certain practices are based on culture or religion. Although international human rights law protects the right to freedom of religion, sexual-based violence cannot be excused on religious grounds, and it has taken too long for laws to begin to act against practices that constitute torture or ill-treatment. The chapter invites readers to view women as the protagonists of human rights standards rather than continually framing men as the central figures of such rights; the standard of protection cannot always be viewed through the lens of male actors. The chapter then moves beyond the gender perspective as a tool to protect women and analyzes the need for the specific recognition of harms suffered by trans and intersex individuals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation of LGBT Persons Version 2.0
    COUNTRY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2019 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) Morocco Situation of LGBT persons version 2.0 © 2019 The Danish Immigration Service The Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 2100 Copenhagen Denmark Phone: +45 35 36 66 00 newtodenmark.dk September 2019 All rights reserved to the Danish Immigration Service. The publication can be downloaded for free at newtodenmark.dk The Danish Immigration Service’s publications can be quoted with clear source reference. Front page photo: https://www.yabiladi.com/articles/details/63789/vers‐vague‐ migrants‐lgbt‐marocains.html MOROCCO - SITUATION OF LGBT PERSONS 2.0 List of Content Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................................................3 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 5 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Background: changes over time in norms and values ....................................................................... 8 2. Situation of LGBT persons in Morocco ............................................................................................. 9 2.1 The legislative framework relating to sexuality ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Publicationsthe Prohibition of Torture
    THE PROHIBITION OF TORTURE: AN INTRODUCTORY GUIDE This is a publication of the Center for Hu- man Rights & Humanitarian Law at American University College of Law — authored by Associate Director of Impact Litigation and the Kovler Project Against Torture Jennifer de Laurentiis and Assistant Director of the Anti- Torture Initiative Andra Nicolescu, and designed by Center Program Coordinator Anastassia Fagan. TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM DEAN CAMILLE A. NELSON.......................................................................................................i MESSAGE FROM CENTER DIRECTOR, PROFESSOR MACARENA SAEZ.........................................................ii INTRODUCTION: WHY DOES THE PROHIBITION OF TORTURE AND OTHER ILL-TREATMENT MATTER?...............................................................................................................1 WHAT IS TORTURE?.....................................................................................................................................................2 WHAT ARE “OTHER ACTS OF CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT WHICH DO NOT AMOUNT TO TORTURE?”...................................................5 WHAT IS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TORTURE & OTHER ILL-TREATMENT?...........................................6 CAN PRIVATE ACTORS COMMIT “TORTURE”?......................................................................................................7 WHAT DOES THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE REQUIRE?.....................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Data Protection
    Factsheet – Personal data protection May 2021 This factsheet does not bind the Court and is not exhaustive Personal data protection “The mere storing of data relating to the private life of an individual amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 8 [of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence1] ... The subsequent use of the stored information has no bearing on that finding ... However, in determining whether the personal information retained by the authorities involves any ... private-life [aspect] ..., the Court will have due regard to the specific context in which the information at issue has been recorded and retained, the nature of the records, the way in which these records are used and processed and the results that may be obtained ...” (S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom, judgment (Grand Chamber) of 4 December 2008, § 67) Collection of personal data DNA information and fingerprints See below, under “Storage and use of personal data”, “In the context of police and criminal justice”. GPS data Uzun v. Germany 2 September 2010 The applicant, suspected of involvement in bomb attacks by a left-wing extremist movement, complained in particular that his surveillance via GPS and the use of the data obtained thereby in the criminal proceedings against him had violated his right to respect for private life. The Court held that there had been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention. The GPS surveillance and the processing and use of the data thereby obtained had admittedly interfered with the applicant’s right to respect for his private life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2014 Holes in the Historical Record: The olitP ics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 Lynsey Chediak Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Chediak, Lynsey, "Holes in the Historical Record: The oP litics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977" (2014). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 875. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/875 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE Holes in the Historical Record: The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR LISA FORMAN CODY AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY LYNSEY CHEDIAK FOR SENIOR HISTORY THESIS SPRING 2014 April 28, 2014 Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the brilliant minds of my professors at Claremont McKenna College and the encouragement of my family. First, I would like to thank my reader and advisor, Professor Lisa Forman Cody. From my first day in her class, Professor Cody took what I was trying to say and made my statement, and me, sound ten times smarter. From that moment, I started to truly believe in the power of my ideas and a central tenet that made this thesis possible: there is no wrong answer in history, only evidence. Through countless hours of collaboration, Professor Cody spurred my ideas to levels I never could have imagined and helped me to develop my abilities to think critically and analytically of the historical record and the accuracy of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Rights Violations As Torture Or Ill-Treatment
    REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AS TORTURE OR ILL-TREATMENT CAT Committee Jurisprudence on Violations of Reproductive Rights The Committee against Torture (CAT Committee) has found that several restrictions on access to reproductive health services and abuses that occur when seeking these services may constitute violations of the Convention against Torture (CAT) because they put women’s health and lives at risk or may otherwise cause them severe physical or mental pain or suffering. For instance, the CAT Committee has found that complete bans on abortion, which exist in only five countries in the world (Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chile, Malta, and the Dominican Republic) may constitute torture or ill-treatment on their face, because these laws place women at a risk of preventable maternal mortality. • As the CAT Committee noted in its 2009 review of El Salvador, “the current Criminal Code of 1998 penalizes and punishes with imprisonment for periods ranging from 6 months to 12 years all forms of recourse to voluntary interruption of pregnancy, including in cases of rape or incest, which has resulted in serious harm to women, including death,” recommending that El Salvador take measure to prevent torture and ill-treatment by “providing the required medical treatment, by strengthening family planning programmes and by offering better access to information and reproductive health services, including for adolescents.”1 The CAT Committee has also recommended that abortion be legal in a variety of instances where a pregnancy may cause a woman severe physical or mental suffering. To date, the CAT Committee has found that states have an obligation to ensure access to abortion for women whose health or life is at risk, who are the victims of sexual violence, or who are carrying non- viable fetuses.
    [Show full text]
  • IHRA 20210628 Review
    28 June 2021 Review of Victorian government, community and related resources on intersex Morgan Carpenter, Intersex Human Rights Australia (IHRA) 1 Contents 1 Contents ........................................................................................................................... 2 2 About this review ............................................................................................................. 2 3 Summary oF key issues ..................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Key issues arising in the resources review ................................................................ 3 3.2 A note on changing nomenclature ........................................................................... 4 4 Victorian government ....................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Bettersafercare.vic.gov.au ........................................................................................ 5 4.2 Health.vic.gov.au ...................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Victorian public service ........................................................................................... 10 5 Community and support organisations .......................................................................... 10 5.1 Australian X & Y Spectrum Support (AXYS) ............................................................. 10 5.2 Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Support Group Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Intersex Human Rights Australia May 2018
    Intersex Human Rights Australia May 2018 7 May 2018 Submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission on the Review of the Family Law System – Issues Paper 1 Introduction We thank the Australian Law Reform Commission for the opportunity to make a submission on the Review of the Family Law System—Issues Paper. Intersex Human Rights Australia (IHRA) is a national intersex-led organisation that promotes the human rights (including the bodily autonomy) of people born with intersex variations. Formerly known as Organisation Intersex International (OII) Australia, IHRA is a not-for-profit company, with Public Benevolent Institution (charitable) status: http://ihra.org.au. This submission is endorsed by: The Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Support Group Australia (AISSGA), a peer support, information and advocacy group by and for people affected by androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) and/or related intersex variations and variations of sex characteristics, and their families: http://aissga.org.au Disabled People’s Organisations Australia (DPO Australia) is a national coalition of Disabled People’s Organisations, which are run by and for people with disability and grounded in a normative human rights framework: http://www.dpoa.org.au The National LGBTI Health Alliance is the national peak health organisation in Australia for organisations and individuals that provide health-related programs, services and research focused on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people (LGBTI) and other sexuality, gender, and bodily diverse people and communities: http://lgbtihealth.org.au People with Disability Australia (PWDA) is a national disability rights and advocacy organisation, and member of DPO Australia. PWDA’s primary membership is made up of people with disability and organisations primarily constituted by people with disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Torture and the Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Detainees: the Effectiveness and Consequences of 'Enhanced
    TORTURE AND THE CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DE- GRADING TREATMENT OF DETAINEES: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ‘EN- HANCED’ INTERROGATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2007 Serial No. 110–94 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–765 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:46 Jul 29, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\WORK\CONST\110807\38765.000 HJUD1 PsN: 38765 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Chairman HOWARD L. BERMAN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas RICK BOUCHER, Virginia F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ROBERT C. ‘‘BOBBY’’ SCOTT, Virginia HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina ELTON GALLEGLY, California ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MAXINE WATERS, California DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts CHRIS CANNON, Utah ROBERT WEXLER, Florida RIC KELLER, Florida LINDA T. SA´ NCHEZ, California DARRELL ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MIKE PENCE, Indiana HANK JOHNSON, Georgia J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio STEVE KING, Iowa LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois TOM FEENEY, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California TRENT FRANKS, Arizona TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas ANTHONY D.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland
    LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland FULL REPORT Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann August 2020 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Page is blank intentionally 2 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland Acknowledgements Project team: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Project coordination: Fernando Lannes Fernandes University of Dundee Project funder: Barrow Cadbury Trust Report authors: Fernando Lannes Fernandes Becky Kaufmann Karen Kaufmann Report contributors: Claire Ferrier Emma Craig Report proofreading: Louise Galluzzo Report design: Kristi Louise Herd How to cite this report Fernandes, FL, Kaufmann, B & Kaufmann, K 2020, LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland (Full Report). University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. https://doi.org/10.20933/100001165 3 LGBT+ People in Prisons: Experiences in England and Scotland We would like to thank every participant in this project who took time to be interviewed and offered us an insight into their life experiences, both as people in custody and the prison staff. We also want to thank the prison services in Scotland (Scottish Prison Service) and England (Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services) who gave us permission to carry out interviews in prisons. In every prison we visited, we were made to feel very welcome, and were heartened by the openness of Scottish and English prisons to independent research. Such openness is, indeed, very important to the democratic process and public transparency, and we are grateful to all gatekeepers who facilitated our access to people in prisons and provided a safe environment that ensured the confidentiality of the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet
    Research Collection Monograph ON/OFF: Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet Author(s): Genner, Sarah Publication Date: 2017 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010805600 Originally published in: http://doi.org/10.3218/3800-2 Rights / License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library ON | OFF Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet Sarah Genner This work was accepted as a PhD thesis by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Zurich in the spring semester 2016 on the recommendation of the Doctoral Committee: Prof. Dr. Daniel Sü ss (main supervisor, University of Zurich, Switzerland) and Prof. Dr. Urs Gasser (Harvard University, USA). Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation. Bibliographic Information published by Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. This work is licensed under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Cover photo: fl ickr.com/photos/zuerichs-strassen © 2017, vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich ISBN 978-3-7281-3799-9 (Print) ISBN 978-3-7281-3800-2 (Open Access) DOI 10.3218/3800-2 www.vdf.ethz.ch [email protected] Table of Contents Preface ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 1
    Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 1 Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2 Frequently Asked Questions Bent Bars Project December 2020 The Bent Bars Project is a letter-writing and solidarity project for LGBTQ+ prisoners in Britain. We provide direct support to LGBTQ+ prisoners, build community across prison walls, and raise public awareness about LGBTQ+ prison issues. We are a small, completely volunteer-run organisation which has been running since 2009. Bent Bars Project PO Box 66754 London WC1A 9BF www.bentbarsproject.org Trans Prisoners Info Sheet #2: Frequently Asked Questions 3 Introduction The purpose of this info sheet is to answer common questions and provide factual information about the situation of trans and non-binary people in prison in the UK.1 This information sheet is one of three and we encourage you to read all of them. Trans and gender non-conforming people face high levels of discrimination, inequality and social exclusion. This can result in targeted policing, criminalisation and imprisonment. When in prison, trans and gender non-conforming people are often subject to increased isolation, harassment, violence and denial of health care. This is especially the case for trans people in poverty, trans people of colour, those with disabilities and those with little family or community support. The imprisonment of trans and gender non-conforming people is not a new issue, but recently there has been an increase in public interest around trans prisoners. Greater awareness and informed discussion is to be welcomed. However, as with much reporting of prison-related issues in general, a lot of media coverage around trans prisoners has been characterised by sensationalist reporting, misleading claims, and decontextualised statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersex and Transgender Student Support
    https://ashm.org.au/training/kirby-seminar/ These slides are for educational use only. They may not be published, posted online, or used in commercial presentations without prior permission from the presenter. Morgan Carpenter Co-executive director at Intersex Human Rights Australia (formerly OIIAU) ihra.org.au M.Bioethics (Sydney); PhD candidate in bioethics at Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney sydney.edu.au/medicine/sydney-health-ethics/ Justice of the Peace in NSW. Home page: morgancarpenter.com 2 “The ALLY@UNSW network are trained staff and students that aims to ensure that UNSW is a safe and welcoming place for all students and staff who identify as LGBTIQ.” UNSW. 2019. ‘LGBTIQ Support for Students & Staff | UNSW Current Students’. March 18. https://student.unsw.edu.au/ally 3 “Gender affirmation and transition support “Intersex and transgender student support “Transgender students who seek support before, during or affirming transition may choose to speak to an Educational Support Advisor. Educational support advisors can assist with referrals to services both on and off campus as well as liaise regarding administrative issues within the such names and identity. Educational support advisors can assist you to plan your transition.” UNSW. 2018. ‘Gender Affirmation and Transition Support | UNSW Current Students’. July 17. https://student.unsw.edu.au/ally/gender 4 “The performance’s leading character, Carmen, is the fictional love- child of Leon Trotsky and Frida Kahlo, so naturally she has plenty of stories to relay. Viewers are presented with a bounty of visual delights… Carmen’s costume highlights her sexuality with a giant sparkling gem adorning her crotch, the lighting expertly sets the mood with hues of blue and pink… “As an intersex person, Carmen, herself is ‘other’.
    [Show full text]