M27 Southampton Junctions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M27 Southampton Junctions M27 Southampton Junctions PCF Stage 1 – Environmental Study Report December 2016 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1 1.1 IDENTIFY THE SCHEME AND STAGE OF SCHEME ...................................... 1 1.2 LOCATION OF SCHEME ................................................................................... 1 1.3 SCOPE AND CONTENT .................................................................................... 3 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ....................................................................... 4 2 THE SCHEME ............................................................................... 5 2.1 BACKGROUND TO THE SCHEME ................................................................... 5 2.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND THE SCHEME OBJECTIVES ................ 5 2.3 LAND USE SETTING AND LAND TAKE ........................................................ 11 2.4 CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND LONG TERM MANAGEMENT .......... 12 3 ALTERNATIVES UNDER CONSIDERATION ............................ 13 3.1 DESIGN OPTIONS EXAMINED IN PCF STAGE 0 ......................................... 13 3.2 DESIGN OPTIONS EXAMINED IN PCF STAGE 1 ......................................... 13 3.3 SCENARIO OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. 17 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ASSUMPTIONS MADE ................................. 20 4.1 GENERAL APPROACH ................................................................................... 20 4.2 BASELINE TRAFFIC FLOWS ......................................................................... 20 4.3 SCOPING ......................................................................................................... 21 4.4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA .............................................................................. 23 4.5 MITIGATION/ENHANCEMENT ........................................................................ 23 5 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................. 24 5.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 24 5.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 24 iv 5.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................... 24 5.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 27 5.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................ 32 5.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 34 5.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 35 5.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED ................................ 43 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE ............................................................. 45 6.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 45 6.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 45 6.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................... 46 6.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 46 6.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................ 60 6.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 62 6.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 63 6.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED ................................ 68 7 LANDSCAPE, TOWNSCAPE AND VISUAL ASSESSMENT .... 69 7.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 69 7.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 69 7.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................... 71 7.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 71 7.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................ 74 7.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 76 7.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 77 7.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED ................................ 88 8 NATURE CONSERVATION ....................................................... 89 8.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 89 v 8.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 89 8.3 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 94 8.4 VALUE (SENSITIVITY) OF RESOURCE ....................................................... 106 8.5 REGULATORY / POLICY FRAMEWORK ..................................................... 108 8.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 109 8.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 112 8.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED .............................. 125 9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ........................................................... 126 9.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 126 9.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 126 9.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 131 9.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 131 9.5 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 142 9.6 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 143 9.7 INDICATION OF DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED ...................................... 148 10 MATERIALS ............................................................................. 149 10.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 149 10.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 149 10.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 150 10.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 150 10.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK .............................................. 155 10.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 157 10.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 159 10.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED .............................. 167 11 NOISE AND VIBRATION ......................................................... 168 11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 168 vi 11.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 168 11.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 172 11.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 172 11.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK .............................................. 176 11.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 176 11.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 177 11.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED .............................. 190 12 PEOPLES AND COMMUNITIES .............................................. 191 12.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 191 12.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................. 191 12.3 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 193 12.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 194 12.5 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK .............................................. 203 12.6 DESIGN, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES, INCLUDING MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 205 12.7 OVERALL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................. 208 12.8 INDICATION OF ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED .............................. 223 13 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT ......... 224 13.1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester
    Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester Design and Access Statement February 2021 Revision Date Revision Notes Prepared by Authorised by * 2020-12-18 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev B 2020-12-22 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev C 2021-01-04 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev D 2021-01-06 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev E 2021-01-29 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev F 2021-02-02 VTS/IDP KD/SR \\IDPSVR01\Projects\N81-2818 Bosham, BDW S'ton\Documents\D&A\Bosham Design and Access Statement.indd [INDD Modified 2021-02-02 10:49], [PDF Output 2021-02-02 10:55] 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction Section 4: Access Proposals 1.1 Introduction 6 4.1 Connections, Movement and Street Hierarchy 38 1.2 Summary of Proposals 7 4.2 Parking 39 Section 5: BHL Assessment Section 2: The Site 5.1 Building for a Healthy Life Assessment 42 2.1 Site Location 10 2.2 Site Description 11 2.3 Site Photographs 12 2.4 Site Context 13 2.5 Constraints and Opportunities 15 2.6 Parish Council Consultation 16 2.7 Layout Analysis 17 2.8 Design Concept 18 Section 3: Design Proposals 3.1 Layout 20 3.2 Accommodation 22 3.3 Affordable Homes 23 3.4 Community / Village Hall 24 3.5 Spatial Syntax 25 3.6 Scale 26 3.7 Materials 27 3.8 Landscape 28 3.9 Streetscenes 30 3.10 Visualisations 32 3 4 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction This Design and Access Statement has been prepared by IDPartnership on behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes Southampton to accompany a detailed planning submission for a residential development on land at Highgrove Farm, Bosham, Chichester.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation
    M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation March 2018 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford, GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation M3 JUNCTION 9 IMPROVEMENT SCHEME PCF STAGE 2 (OPTION SELECTION) REPORT ON PUBLIC CONSULTATION Highways England Date: March 2018 Project no: 70015218 HE PIN: 551511 Prepared for: Highways England Bridge House Walnut Tree Close Guildford Surrey GU1 4LZ Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4HJ Hampshire United Kingdom Tel: +44-(0) 1256 318800 www.wsp.com ii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 SUITABILITY Remarks P01 Date March 2018 Carole Lehman / Prepared by Adam Webb Signature Checked by Duncan Brooks Signature Authorised by Pradeep Agrawal Signature PIN: HE551511 Project number WSP ref: 70015218 Report number HE551511-WSP-GEN-M3J9PCF2-RP-TR-00048 iii M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT (HIGHWAYS ENGLAND) Major Projects Programme Lead Steve Hoesli Major Projects Senior Project Neil Andrew Manager Major Projects Project Manager Simon Hewett Senior User Representative Paul Benham WSP Tel: +44 (0)1684 851 751 RIS Area 3 Programme Director Steve O’Donnell RIS Area 3 Programme Manager Stuart Craig Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 660 Project Director Roland Diffey Tel: +44 (0)1256 318 777 Project Manager Pradeep Agrawal Tel: +44 (0)2031 169 090 iv M3 Junction 9 Improvement Scheme PCF Stage 2 – Report on Public Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................9 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fareham Local Development Scheme Annual Monitoring Report 2012
    Fareham Local Development Scheme Shaping Fareham’s Future Annual Monitoring Report 2012 - 2013 (Published February 2014) Fareham LDF Monitoring Report February 2014 Further Information and Contacts Information on the general Local Development Framework process, updates on the progress of Fareham’s Local Development Documents and current consultations, are available at the following website: www.fareham.gov.uk/ldf. If you have any questions regarding Fareham’s Local Development Framework including this document, please contact a member of the Strategic Planning & Design Service at Fareham Borough Council. Telephone: 01329 826100 Email: [email protected] Address: Strategic Planning & Design Department of Strategic Planning and Environment Fareham Borough Council Civic Offices Civic Way Fareham Hampshire PO16 7AZ For more detailed information and guidance on the planning system, visit the Department for Communities and Local Government website at http://www.communities.gov.uk. If you require this document in large print, or help with translation into other languages, please call 01329 236100 for further information. Fareham LDF Monitoring Report February 2014 Contents Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Purpose & Aim of the Monitoring Report 4 Related Visions & Objectives 5 Fareham in Context 5 2. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME DELIVERY AND 8 IMPLEMENTATION 8 Local Development Scheme 8 Local Development Document Progress 8 Progress in preparing the Local Plan 3. HOUSING MONITORING AND SUPPLY 13 Past Housing Delivery (outside Welborne) 13 Projected housing delivery (outside Welborne) 14 Five Year Housing Land Supply (outside Welborne) 14 Fareham Borough Housing Trajectory 2006-2026 (outside 15 Welborne) 18 Housing Supply at Welborne (SDA) 4. EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIL FLOORSPACE MONITORING 19 Key Findings 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 3797-Oakeley-Vale-Brochure-Digital
    OAKELEY VALE, PROVIDENCE HILL, BURSLEDON WELCOME TO OAKELEY VALE WE ARE PROUD TO PRESENT OUR LATEST COLLECTION OF TRADITIONAL 3, 4 AND 5 BEDROOM FAMILY HOMES, IN THE WELL-CONNECTED VILLAGE OF BURSLEDON. Nestled in a prime, family friendly location just Outdoor fun is close at hand with a specially 15 minutes from Southampton, Oakeley Vale is designed play area and play trail that will keep perfectly positioned to enjoy the spoils of the the kids (and the young at heart!) occupied Hampshire coastline and countryside whilst for hours. offering easy access to the motorway and local Venture outside of your front door and you’ll commuter routes. find everything you need for everyday life. Local Thoughtfully arranged around large areas of open shops, schools for all age groups, recreational green space, the homes at Oakeley Vale benefit and leisure facilities at Holly Hill Leisure Centre, from a close relationship with nature. A raised offering regular classes and family events, and boardwalk over a small natural stream provides a convenient 24-hour supermarket with petrol an enchanting nature walk, with convenient station. There really is something for everyone. seating and a viewing deck well placed for enjoying the wildlife. 2 3 OAKELEY VALE, PROVIDENCE HILL, BURSLEDON LOCAL ADVENTURES RIGHT ON YOUR DOORSTEP LOOKING FOR A DAY OUT? BURSLEDON AND THE SURROUNDING LOCAL AREA HAVE ALL YOUR NEEDS CATERED FOR. FROM THE ADVENTUROUS TO THE SEDATE, YOU’LL FIND IT ALL IN HAMPSHIRE AND THE NEIGHBOURING COUNTIES. THE QUESTION IS, WHAT TO DO FIRST? Families are spoilt for choice with Manor If retail therapy is what you’re after, look no Farm, part of the River Hamble Country further than Southampton’s Westquay, with Park, just minutes from home offering the floor upon floor of high street favourites and opportunity to get up close to the animals convenient tasty restaurants ready to refuel and watch them grow.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL Material for Both the Newsletter and Sussex Industrial History Is Always Welcome
    A NOTE TO CONTRIBUTORS SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL Material for both the Newsletter and Sussex Industrial History is always welcome. It would ARtHAEOLOCY SOCIEfY however make life easier if Registen!d ClIariIy No. 267159 i. contributions were typed or hand written with plenty of space between the lines. This enables editorial changes, often necessary to ensure a common style between articles, e.g. the way dates are written, to be clearly seen at the word processing stage. NEWSLETTER No. 80 ISSN 0263 516X ii. Members composing articles on their own wordprocessor are invited to submit with the text the disc from Which it is derived to avoid the need to enter the whole article again via Price 25p to non-Members OCTOBER 1993 the keyboard. This can save the Society cost. The editors would much appreciate co-operation in these matters. CHIEF CONTENTS Wealden Sandstone Quarry , ,ilitary /Defence SiteS in ~ussex:- OFFICERS ( I ~ The Ringmer Buffer Depot Underground Rotor Stations in Sussex President A.J. Haselfoot 'Black'lransmitter near Crow borough Chairman Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey, Home Farm, Herons Ghyll, Uckfield News from Amberley Museum Vice Chairman J.5.F. Blackwell, 21 Hythe Road, Brighton BN1 6]R (0273) 557674 Sussex Mills Group News General Sec: R.G. Martin, 42 Falmer Ave, Saltdean, Brighton, BN28FG (0273) 303805 Treasurer & J.M.H. Bevan, 12 Charmandean Rd, WortFiing BN14 9LB (0903) 235421 Membership Sec: PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Editor B. Austen, 1 Mercedes Cottages, St John's Rd, Haywards Heath RH16 4EH l' (0444) 413845 Saturday 23 October 7.30 p.m Members' evening with several short talks in Drama Room, Archivist P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Rights of Way Panel (WEST)
    Public Document Pack Planning and Rights of Way Panel (WEST) Tuesday, 3rd May, 2016 at 6.00 pm PLEASE NOTE TIME OF MEETING Council Chamber - Civic Centre This meeting is open to the public Members Councillor Denness (Chair) Councillor Lloyd (Vice-Chair) Councillor Claisse Councillor L Harris Councillor Mintoff Contacts Democratic Support Officer Ed Grimshaw Tel: 023 8083 2390 Email: [email protected] Planning and Development Manager Samuel Fox Tel: 023 8083 2044 Email: [email protected] 2 PUBLIC INFORMATION Role of the Planning and Rights of Way Panel The Panel deals with various planning and Smoking policy – The Council operates a no- rights of way functions. It determines smoking policy in all civic buildings planning applications and is consulted on proposals for the draft development plan. Mobile Telephones:- Please switch your mobile telephones to silent whilst in the meeting Public Representations: -At the discretion of the Chair, members of the public may Use of Social Media:- The Council supports the address the meeting on any report included video or audio recording of meetings open to the on the agenda in which they have a relevant public, for either live or subsequent broadcast. interest. Any member of the public wishing to However, if, in the Chair’s opinion, a person address the meeting should advise the filming or recording a meeting or taking Democratic Support Officer (DSO) whose photographs is interrupting proceedings or contact details are on the front sheet of the causing a disturbance, under the Council’s agenda. Standing Orders the person can be ordered to stop their activity, or to leave the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Church Lane, Colden Common Local Plan Part 2: Design Statement for 1871 & 2561 (Including OBJECTIONS to Policy CC1)
    Land at Church Lane, Colden Common Local Plan Part 2: Design Statement for 1871 & 2561 (including OBJECTIONS to Policy CC1) December 2014 N 1. National Park, SSSI/SAC, Heritage Landscape & Ancient Woodland wrap the North, West & East of Colden Common. 2. Lack of open-space to the south of the Colden Common 3. Busy roads & tree-protection designations further restrict development sites 4. 1871 & 2561 can be shown to support a clear and rational opportunity for development DECEMBER 2014 STRATEGIC CONCEPT Project Location LAND AT CHURCH LANE LP2 01 N Proposed site access and Masterplan Area: Footpath to school new pedestrian crossing 1871 (0,87ha, 2.14acres) 2671 (7.82ha, 19.32acres) Total (8.69ha, 21.46acres) Site Location: Longitude: 50.9907N Latitude: -1.3201571E OS: SU 47811 21481 CHURCH LANE 1871 Green-zone setback can replicate other noted landscape on Church Lane and preserves existing character Revised Settlement Boundary Why isn't settlement boundary revised across the south of 1871? 2561 Extract from Village Design Statement New Public Open Space (see Landscape Strategy/LVIA) DECEMBER 2014 LOCATION PLAN (1:2500) Project Location LAND AT CHURCH LANE LP2 02 N Listed Buildings Village Centre SSSI / SAC National & School Park (generally) Drainage 1870 2494 Pipe 2497 Listed Landscape 888 889 275 Ancient Woodland 1874 Protected Tree Features Non Car Dominated 2389 Pedestrian Access Proposed change to southern settlement boundary. Why not similar for 1871? 1871 2500 Access to Public Open Space 2561 Footpaths, Bridleways, 2498 KEY Cyclepath and Employment Bus Sites Stops Extended Public Right of Way National Park and Cyclepath Feature Public Open Space * with Public Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Ebook.Pmd
    Other ebooks in the series Published by: ENGLAND Travel Publishing Ltd Bedfordshire Berkshire Airport Business Centre, 10 Thornbury Road, Buckinghamshire Cambridgeshire Estover, Plymouth PL6 7PP Cheshire Cornwall ISBN13 9781907462160 Cumbria Derbyshire Devon Dorset Durham East Sussex East Yorkshire Essex © Travel Publishing Ltd Gloucestershire Hampshire Herefordshire Hertfordshire Isle of Man Isle of Wight Kent First Published: 1990 Second Edition: 1994 Leicestershire & Rutland Lancashire Third Edition: 1997 Fourth Edition: 1999 Lincolnshire Merseyside & Manchester Fifth Edition: 2001 Sixth Edition: 2003 Norfolk Northamptonshire Seventh Edition: 2005 Eighth Edition: 2009 Northumberland Ninth Edition: 2011 North Yorkshire Nottinghamshire Oxfordshire Shropshire Somerset South Yorkshire Staffordshire Suffolk Please Note: Surrey Tyne and Wear Warwickshire & W Midlands All advertisements in this publication have been accepted in West Sussex good faith by Travel Publishing. West Yorkshire Wiltshire Worcestershire All information is included by the publishers in good faith and WALES is believed to be correct at the time of going to press. No Anglesey and North Coast responsibility can be accepted for errors. North Wales Borderlands Carmarthenshire Ceredigion Editors: Hilary Weston and Jackie Staddon Gower & Heritage Coast Monmouthshire North Powys Pembrokeshire Snowdonia & Lleyn Peninsula Cover Photo: Lymington Quay South Powys © ian badley/ Alamy SCOTLAND Argyll Text Photos: See page 72 Ayrshire & Arran The Borders Dumfries & Galloway Edinburgh and The Lothians Fife Glasgow & West Central This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not by Highlands Inner Hebrides way of trade or otherwise be lent, re-sold, hired out, or North East Scotland otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in Orkney and Shetland any form of binding or cover other than that which it is Perthshire, Angus & Kinross published and without similar condition including this Stirling and Clackmannan Western Isles condition being imposed on the subsequent purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2011-2029
    Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2011-2029 Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 What is this about? What should I look at? How can I get involved? What happens next? How to use this document 2. Eastleigh Borough – key characteristics and issues 6 3. Vision and objectives 35 4. Towards a strategy 42 5. Strategy 59 Strategy for new development 59 Strategy for managing development 66 Key Diagram 98 6. Development management policies 99 7. Parish by parish - policies and proposals 141 8. Implementation 207 9. Proposals map Appendices: Appendix A Legislation, plans and strategies 210 Appendix B Relationship between issues, 221 vision and objectives Appendix C Sustainability Appraisals of broad locations 235 – outcomes Appendix D Schedule of policies 240 1 1. Introduction - What is this about? 1.1 This is a consultation about a new plan for Eastleigh Borough. It follows on from the issues consultation we undertook in 20081 jointly with work on the borough’s Community Plan. We need to replace the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan Review 2001-2011, which contains policies for development in the borough. Many of the new allocations it identifies have now been developed, and its policies are becoming out- of-date. We need to make provision for future needs in the borough, and also for wider needs of the south Hampshire area where the borough sits. 1.2 We have started work on a new set of policies, and this document sets out a first draft of the Borough Council’s ideas for how the borough should develop over the next 18 years, up to 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Annual Review 2018
    2018 Annual Review WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP connecting communities with places and opportunities SUSSEX COMMUNITY RAIL PARTNERSHIP CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION SCRP IN 2018 Welcome to our Review of 2018 Partnership structure 2018 has been an incredibly busy year for the Sussex Sussex Community Rail Partnership (SCRP) was formed Community Rail Partnership (SCRP), now in its 10th year in 2002 and has operated as a not for profi t Limited as a Limited Company. Company since 2008. SCRP is managed by volunteer A new community line was launched between Hove and directors, who provide local, independent expertise. We Angmering and the North Downs Line was extended to employ eight staff who coordinate project work within Reading. 18 new station partnerships were formed with local their community area. community support. Go-Learn reached over 3,200 children and Active Access We work in partnership with train operators, Network Rail, community groups, supported over 70 young people. The SCRP worked closely with partners to local authorities and local businesses, helping them to achieve their objectives. deliver World War 1 commemorations at 16 stations and launched a new suite SCRP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board meets twice a year and represents an of Line Guides and promotional videos. opportunity to update members on developments, to seek guidance on future The SCRP works with many partners to deliver projects, including individuals, strategy and to hear guest speakers from the rail industry. community groups, businesses, Network Rail and local authorities. We are SCRP now has seven Community Rail Lines, and each has a Development grateful for the support we receive from Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Offi cer who arranges four steering group meetings a year to monitor progress Great Western Railway (GWR) and our stakeholders who provide advice and on the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]