Lewis and Barfield on Imagination: Part II," Mythlore: a Journal of J.R.R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lewis and Barfield on Imagination: Part II, Volume 17 Number 3 Article 3 Spring 3-15-1991 Lewis and Barfield on Imagination: arP t II Stephen Thorson Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Thorson, Stephen (1991) "Lewis and Barfield on Imagination: Part II," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 17 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol17/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Contrasts Lewis’s and Barfield’s views on imagination, and its relationship to truth and knowledge. Additional Keywords Anthroposophy and imagination; Barfield, Owen—Epistemology—Imagination; Imagination—Relation ot knowledge; Imagination—Relation to truth; Imagination, Theory of; Lewis, C.S.—Epistemology—Imagination This article is available in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol17/iss3/3 Page 16 Issue 65 - SpRing 1991 CDyTHLORC Forc 11 6y Stephen ThoRson The "Great W ar" Letters: Imagination and Truth Therefore, Lewis asserted, 1) even if we are sure that we know in poetic imagination, we can't be sure of what All of the "Great War" letters have not survived. Most we know, and 2) poetic imagination is not in the class of of those that have survived were written by Lewis and things to which True-False can be applied. Lewis hastened preserved by Barfield.15 to add, however, that he did not deny value to poetic In what must be one of the first surviving letters Lewis imagination merely because it does not have the kind of began in his typical manner by distinguishing two uses for Truth he had been talking about. Morality and Beauty do the term "truth." On the one hand, he said, it can be an not have Truth in that sense, either. He quoted Sidney to object or fact; on the other, it can be the "mental complex" the effect that poets do not lie, because they never assert. related to that fact. "I say a complex because when we Barfield's answer has fortunately been preserved. know, we always know that, etc. (an accusative with the Indeed, it is in this letter that he most clearly showed the infinitive)..." Notice that from the very beginning Lewis difference between his thought and Lewis'. First of all, has limited truth to propositional statements that we can Barfield refused to accept Lewis' limited definition of the "know." To be even more specific, he usually spoke of term "Truth." 'Truth to you... is something you look at... truth in terms of a true-false statement (whether a certain while reality is something you are but never see," he said. statement is true or false). We cannot say that emotions or Barfield did not define Truth as an "accurate copy or bodies are true or false, because the concept does not apply reflection" of reality, but as reality itself "taking the form to the things themselves. We can only say whether a of human consciousness." Secondly, he used an argument certain statement about them is true or false. we might call metaphysical since it was based on his view The question at hand was whether or not the truth- of the soul's evolution from Spirit. In it he drew a diagram falsehood concept could be applied to Imagination. Of to explain how "Inspiration, or 'supersensible" course, Lewis said, it does not apply to "ordinary experience, light of sense going out,' etc., is a sort of imagination," the mere "image-makingfaculty." Ordinary withdrawal from A into that-which-is-in-process-of- images merely invented by conscious effort cannot beTrue becoming A, wherein I find that I am also in (i.e. become in any sense of the term. But what about poetic one with) that-which-is-in-process-of-becoming B." There imagination (i.e. Imagination as experienced by both is a similar argument in Barfield's Replicit to Lewis' Summa Lewis and Barfield, and as described in the Surmna)? Lewis in which he attacked Lewis' use of the enjoyment/ pointed out that both he and Barfield had experienced the contemplation distinction. There he pointed out that images appearing after poetic imagination "ebbs." And Imagination could be called "con-enjoyment", since it those images cannot be different from ordinary images; involves moving back toward Spirit from pure soulhood. like them, they are not in that class of things about which In both the letter and the later Replicit the inference is plain. we can use the word Truth. Lewis did suggest, however, Inspiration or "con-enjoyment" must mean seeing Truth that Truth might pertain to some imageless state of from Spirit's perspective. Imagination "wherein the light of sense goes out." Third, Barfield considered the logical process itself to Furthermore, and more importantly for Lewis' view of be inadequate to deal with reality. Since terms change their knowledge, any "sediment" of explicit assertion left with the meaning when passing through time or between people, sediment of images could not be true-or-false either. Even if a term is an "arbitrary cross-section of the process taldng the assertion is true, it could not be the same truth as seen in place in time." Terms must be "artificially taken out of poetic imagination; otherwise, how does poetic imagination time" to be used, while reality continues to change, he said. differ from normal judgement? He likened "the crossing of Therefore, since most sentences are both true and untrue, the frontier" between the inspired and uninspired states to logical statements cannot truly be a vehicle of anything the blurring that takes place "when you change the focus of worthy of the name of knowledge or truth. In other words, your telescope." Summing up his argument so far, Lewis Barfield thought a limiting of Truth to the logical sphere said, "Granting the truth of poetical imagination, we can alone (as Lewis did) was not only inadequate, but ques­ never argue from it to the truth of any judgement which tioned whether the terms knowledge or truth could be springs up in the mind as it returns to normal consciousness." applied to the logical sphere at all. Restating the argument CPyTHLORC Issue 65 - SpRing 1991 Page 17 from his thesis, Barfield noted that terms "perpetually tend Barfield, however, wished to maintain that Imagination to lose their meaning and become tautologous," but could produces Truth, and ultimately could lead to both meaning recover their meaning "at the fount of inspiration, flowing and true statements; that Anthroposophical training could through imagination." In fact, as we saw earlier, Barfield lead to true propositional statements about the reality seen claimed that inspiration and imagination are required in moments of poetic imagination or inspiration. intermediate steps between reality and terms, or between reality and metaphor. We have seen how Lewis' high view of Imagination as Spiritual Awareness in Part II of the Summa was firmly based Barfield agreed with Lewis that one can't argue from on his view of Being in Part I. We began our examination of the truth of poetical imagination to the truth of any the "Great War" letters because they clarified the serious judgment that remains in the mind when it has returned clash which appears at the end of the Summa between Lewis' to normal consciousness. However, Barfield believed that concept of Imagination and his concept of epistemology. We Anthroposophical training could overcome this problem, now can see the broad movement of Lewis' thought as the allowing the poet to retain fully the judgment he had in "Great War" progressed. The debate began over Barfield's normal consciousness throughout an experience of poetic epistemology ("how we know"), which had been based on imagination. He again pointed Lewis toward Steiner's Steiner's Anthroposophy. Lewis continued to argue against "systematic imagination" which could train the mind to this view, strengthened by Alexander's enjoyment/con- observe its own activity. The underlying spiritual reality templation distinction, while at the same time coming to accept is not truth actual, Barfield said, but only truth potential, both Barfield's view of metaphysics (man's Being as a soul needing the Imagination to act upon it first. emerging from Spirit of which it is a part) and Barfield's high Barfield had insisted in his thesis that the poet creates Coleridgean view of Imagination! or re-creates primary meaning through the use of Let us look at the main arguments of the Summa. In metaphor. "The progress is from Meaning [notice the brief summary, Lewis proposed: capital] through inspiration to imagination, and from imagination through metaphor, to meaning" (PD, 141). 1. The soul emerges from Spirit, of which it is a part. Lewis seized Barfield's emphasis on meaning and The world of Nature also emerges from Spirit, and developed a distinction that he was never later to deny.
Recommended publications
  • Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator
    Volume 22 Number 2 Article 3 1998 Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator Diana Pavlac Glyer Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Glyer, Diana Pavlac (1998) "Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 22 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol22/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Biography of Joy Davidman Lewis and her influence on C.S. Lewis. Additional Keywords Davidman, Joy—Biography; Davidman, Joy—Criticism and interpretation; Davidman, Joy—Influence on C.S. Lewis; Davidman, Joy—Religion; Davidman, Joy. Smoke on the Mountain; Lewis, C.S.—Influence of Joy Davidman (Lewis); Lewis, C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • C.S. Lewis, Literary Critic: a Reassessment
    Volume 23 Number 3 Article 2 6-15-2001 C.S. Lewis, Literary Critic: A Reassessment William Calin University of Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Calin, William (2001) "C.S. Lewis, Literary Critic: A Reassessment," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 23 : No. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol23/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Addresses “Lewis’s accomplishments as a medieval and Renaissance scholar; his contributions to theory, and where he can be placed as a proto-theorist; and how well his work holds up today.” Additional Keywords Lewis, C.S. Literary criticism; Medieval literature; Renaissance literature This article is available in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Personal Heresy: Scholars Can Be Gentlemen an Exchange Between C.S
    1 The Personal Heresy: Scholars Can Be Gentlemen An exchange between C.S. Lewis & E.M.W. Tillyard Summarised by Dr Joel D. Heck, of Concordia University, Austin, Texas. WE LOVE the imaginative tales of Narnia, the straightforward theology and clear use of analogy in Mere Christianity, the provocative combination of philosophy and theology in The Problem of Pain or Miracles, and the upside down imagination of The Screwtape Letters, but few of us, whether we have training in English language and literature or not, are able to appreciate the somewhat technical arguments of a book like English Literature in the Sixteenth Century or The Personal Heresy. The Personal Heresy is a book that I have recently become familiar with of necessity. Reprinting this long out of print book has caused me to read the book six times this year for the purpose of proofreading, editing, and in preparation for this article. I must admit, that in the process of having my nose rubbed in its argumentation, I have learned a few things about Lewis that I would never have learned without that nasal chafing. So I pass them on to you here. The book was first published in 1939, and the events leading up to that publication will be rehearsed shortly. Oxford University Press was the original publisher, and it also published a reprint in 1965. But since that time, the book has been out of print . until now. I began two years ago to secure copyright permission for both the Lewis and the Tillyard halves of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Personal Heresy, Scholars
    The Personal Heresy Scholars Can Be Gentlemen Joel D. Heck We love the imaginative tales of Narnia, the straightforward theology and clear use of analogy in Mere Christianity, the provocative combination of philosophy and theology in The Problem of Pain or Miracles, and the upside down imagination of The Screwtape Letters, but few of us, whether we have training in English language and literature or not, are able to appreciate the somewhat technical arguments of a book like English Literature in the Sixteenth Century or The Personal Heresy. The Personal Heresy is a book that I have recently become familiar with of necessity. Reprinting this long out of print book has caused me to read the book six times this year for the purpose of proofreading, editing, and in preparation for this article. I must admit, that in the process of having my nose rubbed in its argumentation, I have learned a few things about Lewis that I would never have learned without that nasal chafing. So I pass them on to you here. The book was first published in 1939, and the events leading up to that publication will be rehearsed shortly. Oxford University Press was the original publisher, and it also published a reprint in 1965. But since that time, the book has been out of print . until now. I began two years ago to secure copyright permission for both the Lewis and the Tillyard halves of the book. The Lewis permission was easy. Just locating the copyright holder for the Tillyard half was quite difficult, however. After some unsuccessful efforts, I contacted Jesus College, Cambridge, which is the College at Cambridge University where Tillyard taught English between 1926 and 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • C. S. Lewis and the Inklings
    C. S. Lewis and the Inklings C. S. Lewis and the Inklings: Reflections on Faith, Imagination, and Modern Technology Edited by Salwa Khoddam, Mark R. Hall and Jason Fisher C. S. Lewis and the Inklings: Reflections on Faith, Imagination, and Modern Technology Edited by Salwa Khoddam, Mark R. Hall and Jason Fisher This book first published 2015 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2015 by Salwa Khoddam, Mark R. Hall, Jason Fisher and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7629-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7629-2 To David L. Neuhouser, longtime colleague, friend, and lover of the Inklings In Memoriam 1933–2015 I have come home at last! This is my real country! I belong here. This is the land I have been looking for all my life, though I never knew it till now… — C. S. Lewis, The Last Battle The notion that motor-cars are more “alive” than, say, centaurs or dragons is curious; that they are more “real” than, say, horses is pathetically absurd. How real, how startlingly alive is a factory chimney compared with an elm-tree: poor obsolete thing, insubstantial dream of an escapist! For my part, I cannot convince myself that the roof of Bletchley station is more “real” than the clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Bibliography of the Works of C.S. Lewis
    C.S. Lewis: A Select Bibliography This is not a comprehensive listing of Lewis’s works. For a more complete list, please see the following: C.S. Lewis: An Annotated Checklist by Joe R. Christopher and Joan K. Ostling (Kent State UP), 1974. Remembering C.S. Lewis: Recollections of Those Who Knew Him. James Como, Ed. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005. (Includes updated Lewis bibliography by Walter Hooper) FICTION -Boxen: The Imaginary World of the Young C. S. Lewis (1905-1913, not published until 1985) -The Pilgrim's Regress (1933) -Out of the Silent Planet (1938) (Science Fiction, Book I of the Space Trilogy) -The Screwtape Letters (1942) -Perelandra (1943) (Science Fiction, Book II of the Space Trilogy) -That Hideous Strength (1945) (Science Fiction, Book III of the Space Trilogy) -The Great Divorce (1945) -The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (1950) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -Prince Caspian (1951) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -The Silver Chair (1953) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -The Horse and His Boy (1954) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -The Magician's Nephew (1955) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -The Last Battle (1956) (The Chronicles of Narnia) -Till We Have Faces (1956) -Screwtape Proposes a Toast and Other Pieces (1965) -Mark vs. Tristram (imaginary correspondence by C.S. Lewis and Owen Barfield, 1967) -The Dark Tower and Other Stories, Walter Hooper, ed. (1977) CORRESPONDENCE -Letters of C.S. Lewis, W.H. Lewis, ed. (1966) -Letters to an American Lady, Clyde Kilby, ed. (1967) -The Letters of C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack of All Genres: a Brief Analysis of CS Lewis's Works
    Southern Adventist University KnowledgeExchange@Southern Senior Research Projects Southern Scholars 12-1995 Jack of All Genres: A Brief Analysis of C.S. Lewis's Works Kimberly Day-Camp Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/senior_research Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Day-Camp, Kimberly, "Jack of All Genres: A Brief Analysis of C.S. Lewis's Works" (1995). Senior Research Projects. 122. https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/senior_research/122 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Southern Scholars at KnowledgeExchange@Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Research Projects by an authorized administrator of KnowledgeExchange@Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jack of All Genres: A Brief Analysis of C.S. Lewis's Works Kimberly Day-Camp Southern Scholars Honors Project Dr. Wilma McClarty December 20, 1995 I Ever since fifth grade when I discovered The Bobbsey Twins (and realized reading could be fun), I have looked forward to my encounters with each new book Far away places, people I had never met and animals that did crazy things all became part of my literary world. Over the years I kept discovering new authors--George MacDonald, Walter Farley, Mark Twain, L.M. Montgomery, Jolm D. Fitzgerald and of course, C.S. Lewis. All of these reading adventures contributed to my identity, enabling me to experience things that otherwise would not have been possible. And at the time, I had no idea that Lewis _(who I greatly admired) read literature in the same way I did.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography Today: Profiles of People of Interest to Young Readers
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 460 907 SO 029 333 AUTHOR Harris, Laurie Lanzen, Ed.; Abbey, Cherie D., Ed. TITLE Biography Today: Profiles of People of Interest to Young Readers. Author Series, Volume 3. ISBN ISBN-0-7808-0166-0 PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 202p.; For volumes 1 and 4, see ED 390 725 and SO 029 744. AVAILABLE FROM Omnigraphics, Inc., 615 Griswold St., Detroit, MI 48226. Tel: 800-234-1340 (Toll Free); Web site: http://www.omnigraphics.com. PUB TYPE Reference Materials General (130) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Adolescent Literature; *Authors; Biographies; Childrens Literature; Elementary Secondary Education; Language Arts; Reading Materials; Social Studies ABSTRACT This is the third volume of the "Biography Today Author Series." Each volume contains alphabetically arranged sketches. Each entry provides at least one picture of the individual profiled with additional information about the birth, youth, early memories, education, first jobs, marriage and family, career highlights, memorable experiences, hobbies, and honors and awards. Each entry ends with a list of accessible sources designed to lead the student to further reading on the individual and a current address. Obituary entries also are included and clearly marked in both the table of contents and at the beginning of the entry. Profiles in this volume include:(1) Candy Dawson Boyd, author of "Circle of Gold," "Charlie Pippin," "Fall Secrets," and "A Different Beat,"(2) Ray Bradbury, novelist and author of "The Martian Chronicles" and "Fahrenheit 451";(3) Gwendolyn Brooks, poet and first African American to win the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry;(4) Ralph W.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1952 Lewis Disclosed That Writing His Magnum Opus on the Literature
    praise for “In 1952 Lewis disclosed that writing his magnum opus on the literature of the sixteenth century had been his ‘top tune’ for fifteen years and all the other books he wrote during that period were ‘only its little twiddly bits.’ It may surprise some readers to hear Lewis describe The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, The Screwtape Letters and The Abolition of Man—to mention just three—as mere twiddly bits in comparison with the main melody of his output. But that was how he saw it. Neal and Root are to be commended for rehabilitating that ‘top tune’ and other similarly neglected works in this clear, useful, and informative survey.” —Michael Ward, University of Oxford, co-editor of The Cambridge Companion to C. S. Lewis “Neal and Root have done us a great service. At a time when we are in danger of being surfeited by the endless rehashing of the well-known C. S. Lewis, they have opened up the treasures of the less known but invaluable Lewis. I found this book delightful and stimulating.” —Os Guinness, author of Carpe Diem Redeemed “Reading The Neglected C. S. Lewis reminded me, a professor at a very secular Russian university, of what Lewis said about Charles Williams’ lecture on Milton’s Comus: ‘I have at last, if only for once, seen a university doing what it was founded to do: teaching wisdom.’” —Olga B. Lukmanova, Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistics University, Russia “I remember my surprise and delight when I discovered, as a literature student, that the author whose Narnia stories I had enjoyed as a child was also a brilliant literary critic, in fact the most lucid and helpful of all the scholars whose works I read at Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • CS Lewis and the Modern World
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Department of English Department of English 2009 "The tS ance of a Last Survivor": C. S. Lewis and the Modern World (Chapter One of The Rhetoric of Certitude) Gary L. Tandy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/eng_fac Part of the Creative Writing Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons The Rhetoric of Certitude The Rhetoric of Certitude C. S. Lewis's Nonfiction Prose GARY L. TANDY The Kent State University Press Kent, Ohio ~/tJGSC~CK Lf/\R~r~\' ~ n[~C~.r r.cE EN"TTR U.Cr:.Cl:" F G>' U!·1iV[F;~ iTY riE\'.TUiG. Oil 9713~' Frontis: C. S. Lewis at his desk. To Janet, Julia, Jackson, Used by permission of The Marion E. Wade Center, and John Garrison. Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL. And for Mom, who waits to greet us in Aslan's Country. © 2009 by The Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio 44242 All rights reserved Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2008030054 ISBN 978-0-87338-973-0 Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tandy, Gary L. The rhetoric of certitude : C. S. Lewis's nonfiction prose I Gary L. Tandy. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-o-87338-973-0 (hardcover: alk. paper) oo 1. Lewis, C. S. (Clive Staples), 1898-1963-Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. PR6023.E926z898 2009 823'.912-dc22 2008030054 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication data are available. 13 12 11 10 09 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Introduction ix 1 "The Stance of a Last Survivor": C.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    1 The Enigma of Autobiography: Critical Refl ections on Surprised by Joy In 1955, Lewis published Surprised by Joy , subtitled “The Shape of My Early Life.” It is one of Lewis ’ s most cited works, and contains some of his fi nest prose and most intimate refl ections. No study of Lewis can fail to engage with (and, at certain critical points, depend upon) Lewis ’ s per- sonal narrative of conversion. Lewis had no hesitation in referring to this “story of my conversion” as his “autobiography.” 1 But what did he mean by this? What are we, his readers, to understand by this term? The Ambivalence of Autobiography in L ewis ’ s Literary Outlook The teasing title of Lewis ’ s autobiography draws on the opening words of the Miltonic sonnet of the same name by the English Romantic writer William Wordsworth (1770–1850). 2 Surprised by joy – impatient as the wind. Wordsworth wrote this sonnet in the aftermath of the death of his three- year-old daughter, Catherine. On experiencing a rare moment of joy following CatherineCOPYRIGHTED ’ s death in 1812, Wordsworth MATERIAL found this precipitated a series of emotional traumas. His fl eeting experience of delight gave way to a somber realization that the one person with whom he longed to share that joy – Catherine – was gone, followed immediately by a pang of guilt over his ability to forget her even for that brief moment. The Intellectual World of C. S. Lewis, First Edition. Alister E. McGrath. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Cs Lewis Is Often Seen Reverting
    logic! said the Professor... Why dont they teach logic at these schools?. C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe,' in The Chronicles of Narnia, Collins, London, 2001. pi 31. 126 Chapter Three: C.S. Lewis. Part One: Biographical Introduction C.S. Lewis has to rank amongst pre-eminent moral educators in the humanities writing in English in the middle part of the twentieth century. His serious cultural studies, notably The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition (1936), English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding Drama (1954) and The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature (1964) are still accounted essential reading to scholars in these fields. Meanwhile, in such texts as The Personal Heresy: A Controversy (1939) and An Experiment in Criticism (1961), he contributed significantly to a growing area of contemporary inquiry, literary critical theory. Millions who do not rate scholarship or the arts highly would herald him arch- protector of their faith, veering towards his devotional and apologetic texts. Finally, we have a vast and varied array of readers appreciating his imaginative prose: the young of all ages who adore The Chronicles of Narnia, comprising seven volumes published in annual installments between 1950 and 1956, and adults who admire the more complex trilogy we are to discuss. Lewis, who thought of himself fit for no employment save as an academic based at a University, the business of which should be, teaching wisdom, 2 was not only a highly successful scholar, but his creative output is approachable by both the very sophisticated and the intellectually naïve.
    [Show full text]