DOCSLIB.ORG

Harris County, Texas Houston, Texas 77002 Commissioners Court Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harris County, Texas Houston, Texas 77002 Commissioners Court Agenda 1001 Preston St., Suite 934 Harris County, Texas Houston, Texas 77002 Commissioners Court Agenda Lina Hidalgo, County Judge Rodney Ellis, Commissioner, Precinct 1 Adrian Garcia, Commissioner, Precinct 2 Tom S. Ramsey, P.E., Commissioner, Precinct 3 R. Jack Cagle, Commissioner, Precinct 4 Tuesday, March 30, 2021 10:00 AM Virtual Public Notice March 26, 2021 - NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING 21-1332 Opening Prayer Rabbi Dan Gordon of Temple Beth Torah in Humble. Appearances before court The Clerk of the Court or another person designated by the presiding member of the court shall keep the time for speakers . Those persons who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting and recognition to speak may be refused at subsequent meetings of the court . Refusal to abide by the court’s order may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. It is the intention of the Harris County Commissioners Court to provide open access to all members of the public of Harris County to express themselves on issues addressed by County government . However, members of the public are reminded that the Harris County Commissioners Court is a constitutional court, created by the State with judicial, administrative and legislative powers. As such, the Harris County Commissioners Court possesses authority to issue Contempt of Court citations. Accordingly, persons shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in addressing the Court, in participating in public discussions before the Court, and in all actions in the presence of the Court . Profane, insulting or threatening language, and racial, ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated . Those persons who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting and recognition to speak may be refused at subsequent meetings of the Court. Refusal to abide by the Court’s Order may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. 3 minutes A speaker whose subject matter as submitted relates to an identifiable item of business on this agenda will be requested to come to the podium where they will be limited to three minutes. A speaker whose subject matter as submitted does not relate to an identifiable item of business on this agenda will be limited to three minutes if they have not appeared at any of the three preceding court meetings on the same issue . 1 minute A speaker whose subject matter as submitted does not relate to an identifiable item of business on this agenda and who has appeared at any of the three preceding court meetings on the same issue will be limited to one minute. Page 1 of 43 Commissioners Court Agenda March 30, 2021 COVID-19 1. Request by Budget Management for approval to extend authorization 21-1192 allowing employees the option to be paid for all hours worked directly related to the response and recovery of COVID-19 for the period of April 10, 2021 through April 23, 2021. 2. Request by Budget Management for approval to temporarily amend the 21-1194 Harris County Personnel Policies and Procedures to suspend the 75-day benefit waiting period for new employees until April 30, 2021. New regular position employees will be eligible for group health benefits the first day of the pay period following seven days of continuous employment. 3. Request by Budget Management for approval to amend the flexible spending 21-1251 account plan to allow employees to roll over any contributions remaining in their accounts for the 2020-21 plan year, to increase the 2021 maximum contribution limit for dependent care, and to allow employees who are contributing to a flexible spending account in the 2021-22 plan year an open enrollment period to make any prospective changes to their flexible spending elections for the 2021-22 plan year. 4. Recommendation by Budget Management to provide up to eight hours of 21-1326 paid time off for regular employees to get the COVID-19 vaccination and to recover from any side effects caused by the vaccine effective with the current pay period. 5. Request by Public Health Services for approval of one of three options with 21-1207 respect to contact tracing operational funding for April 1-30, 2021. 6. Request by Public Health Services for approval of an amendment to a 21-1285 Memorandum of Agreement with Harris County Public Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Inc. 7. Request by Public Health Services that the County Judge execute a 21-1268 memorandum of understanding with SPG Houston Holdings, LP, for access to common areas at Houston Premium Outlets as part of the COVID-19 Community Outreach Program for the period of March 31, 2021-March 30, 2022. 8. Request by Community Services for approval of amendments to agreements 21-1274 with United Health Partners, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc., in support of the joint City of Houston and Harris County Medical Isolation and Recovery Center to extend the terms of services through June 30, 2021 and add additional funding in the amount of $550,000. Page 2 of 43 Commissioners Court Agenda March 30, 2021 9. Request by the District Clerk for approval to increase Juror Pay for the 21-1247 duration of the pandemic to $50 for the first day and $80 for subsequent days. This would require an additional budget appropriation for Fiscal Year 2021-22 of $1,819,946 to be effective May 3, 2021, to coincide with the beginning of Jury Appreciation Week. Secondly, it is being requested to fund and allocate a budget of $200,000 to publicize the juror pay increase to the citizens of Harris County. In addition, the District Clerk is also asking that Harris County provide free parking at 1401 Congress Parking Garage to individuals who are selected to serve on a jury. 10. Transmittal by the Purchasing Agent of a public health or safety exemption 21-1039 with Guidehouse LLP in the amount of $294,000 to provide technical assistance and testing support to Harris County Federal Emergency Rental Assistance Program for the period of March 30, 2021-December 31, 2021. 11. Request by the County Judge for discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 21-952 county’s responses to the pandemic, and possible action regarding the same. 12. Request by the Commissioner of Precinct 1 for discussion and possible action 21-1324 to develop an equity framework for Harris County’s allocation of American Rescue Plan funds to effectively address the needs of communities most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. 13. Request by the Commissioner of Precinct 2 for approval of up to $3 million 21-1263 from the COVID Response and Recovery Fund for an overtime initiative for certain units of the Harris County Sheriff’s Office targeting violent and serious crimes. 14. Request by the Commissioner of Precinct 3 for discussion and possible action 21-1210 regarding reopening of the Harris County libraries. County Engineer 15. Recommendation for Discussion and Possible Action on the Allocation and 21-996 Uses of the $31,916,105 Metro Transfer. 16. Transmittal by the Office of the County Engineer, the Harris County Flood 21-1295 Control District, the Harris County Toll Road Authority, the Harris County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, the Harris County Community Services Department, and Harris County Public Health to provide an update on the status of the Infrastructure Resilience Team (IRT) Phase I Progress Report of the Harris County Flood Resilience Plan as outlined by the IRT Court Letter of September 15th of 2020, which is ready for Community Flood Resilience Task Force (CFRTF) input and review. 17. Recommendation that Commissioners Court Approve the transmittal of 21-997 Notices of Road and Bridge Log Changes and for these Road and Bridge Changes to be Reflected in the Harris County Road Log. Page 3 of 43 Commissioners Court Agenda March 30, 2021 18. Recommendation that the Court approve a study report prepared by WSB & 21-1022 Associates, Inc. dba Nathelyne A. Kennedy & Associates for improvements to Salt Water Ditch, agreement approved January 28, 2020, purchase order FCNTL_0000000861, UPIN 20090MF1F301, Precinct 1. 19. Recommendation that the Court approve a study report prepared by Binkley 21-1023 & Barfield, Inc. for Apache Land Subdivision Drainage Improvements, agreement approved January 8, 2020, purchase order FCNTL_0000000404, UPIN 19102MF12S01, Precinct 2. 20. Recommendation for authorization of certain projects, decreeing the projects 21-1026 to be a public necessity and convenience, directing the Harris County Real Property Division to acquire, and authorizing eminent domain if necessary for one (1) fee simple tract for the public project known as Anderson Road - Hiram Clarke Road to Almeda Road - 2018, for the purpose of roadway detention, UPIN 19101MF0XY01, Precinct 1. 21. Recommendation for authorization of certain projects, decreeing the projects 21-1027 to be a public necessity and convenience, directing the Harris County Real Property Division to acquire, and authorizing eminent domain if necessary for one (1) road easement tract for the public project known as Traffic Signal - Woodforest Blvd. at Normandy Dr. - 2018, for the purpose of traffic signal reconstruction with pedestrian related appurtenances, UPIN 19035MF15501, Precinct 2. 22. Recommendation for authorization for Harris County to convey real estate to 21-1028 the City of Baytown for tract 1WLE, a 0.0318 acre waterline easement from the Wallisville Road Reconstruction from Garth Road to North Main Street project and that the County Judge execute the assignment of easement rights, UPIN 18102MF0S601, Precinct 2. 23. Recommendation for authorization for HCFCD to convey real estate to the 21-1029 North Harris County Regional Water Authority for tract E141-00-00-05-601.0, a 2.888 acre right of way easement from the E141-00-00-05-601.0 - Donation to NHCRWA project and that the County Judge execute the assignment of easement rights, Precinct 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HOUSTON, TEXAS North Houston Industrial East of I-45
    HOUSTON, TEXAS North Houston Industrial East of I-45 Prepared for: Prepared by: BOBBIE BOZARTH, Senior Vice President 1900 West Loop South, Suite 1300 Houston, TX 77027 713.272.1221 [email protected] MAP OF PROPERTIES BUILDING PROFILES AND FLOOR PLANS 1. DCT Airtex Business Center – 14820 North Freeway 2. Cypressbrook Air Center – 1704 Rankin Rd 3. Airport Industrial Park – 16431 Aldine Westfield Rd 4. 15411 Vantage Parkway West 5. Intercontinental Business Park - 15344 Vantage Pkwy East 6. Interwood Business Center – 14430 John F. Kennedy Blvd 7. World Houston Intl Bus. Center, Building 30 – 5656 N. Sam Houston Parkway East 8. World Houston Business Park – 5500 Shirley Lane 9. World Houston Intl. Bus. Center, Building 41 – 15882 Diplomatic Plaza Dr. 10. Greens Road Business Center – Greens Rd & Highway 59 N. FORFOR LEASE: LEASE 126,568 : 178,000 SF with with BTS BTS office Office DCT AirtexDCT FAIRBANKS Business 8Center 14820 North Freeway, Houston, TX 7220 & 7330 N. Sam Houston Parkway W., Houston, TX BUILDING HIGHLIGHTS • 126,568 SF Light Industrial Building • Divisible to +17,000 Square Feet • Rear Load Configuration • 30’ Clear Height • Column Spacing: 52’ X 50’ • ESFR Sprinkler System • Crane Capable • Loading Access: (42) Dock High & (5) Grade Level • Truck Court Depth: 120’ • Ample Passenger Vehicle Parking Mark Nicholas (SIOR), JLL Richard Quarles (CCIM), JLL 713.888.4024 713.888.4019 CONTACT [email protected] [email protected] FORFOR LEASE: LEASE 126,568 : 178,000 SF with with BTS BTS office Office DCT AirtexDCT FAIRBANKS Business 8Center 14820 North Freeway, Houston, TX 7220 & 7330 N.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Traffic and Revenue Forecast
    VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FILING Filed by the Texas Transportation Commission Date of Filing: January 29, 2020 Evaluation and Confirmation of Central Texas Turnpike System 2018 Traffic and Revenue Study Forecast In connection with the offering by the Texas Transportation Commission (the "Commission") of the proposed Central Texas Turnpike System Revenue Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds"), Stantec Consulting Services Inc, ("Stantec"), the acting Traffic Consultant for the Commission in connection with the Central Texas Turnpike System (the "System"), reviewed the report they prepared titled Central Texas Turnpike System 2018 Traffic & Revenue Study dated August 29, 2018 (the "2018 Report") to determine if changes to the underlying economics and other conditions warrant any change to the original forecast. Stantec has issued a letter dated as of January 21, 2020 (the "2020 Update Letter") updating the 2018 Report. For more information regarding the System, the 2020 Update Letter and the 2018 Report, please refer to the Preliminary Official Statement dated January 28, 2020, for the Commission's Bonds which is accessible here and contains updated information regarding the System including the 2020 Update Letter and the 2018 Report. After pricing the Bonds, the final Official Statement will also be filed under the base CUSIPs for the Bonds. This filing is not required to be provided by the Commission or the Texas Department of Transportation ("TxDOT") pursuant to their respective contractual continuing disclosure undertaking relating to their outstanding obligations and, accordingly, should not be construed as obligating the Commission or TxDOT to provide such additional information in future continuing disclosure filings or to provide any updates to the information contained in this filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Per Mile Comparisons 2017
    Copyright (C) 2018 E470 Oversight Project NON INTERSTATE ROADS TOLLS PER MILE (EXCLUDING TOLL ROADS SHORTER THAN 3 MILES) MINIMUM TOLL FOR PASSENGER CARS AS OF JANUARY 1 2017 SOURCE: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MIN PASSENGER VEH TOLL PER STATE NAME FROM TO MILES MILE New York Whiteface Mountain Veterans Memorial Highway Wilmington Whiteface Mountain 5.00 $2.20 New York Prospect Mountain Veterans Memorial Highway US 9 (gate) Top of Prospect Mountain 5.90 $1.69 Illinois Elgin O'Hare Expressway Lake Street Interstate 290 6.43 $0.52 Colorado Pikes Peak Toll Road Town of Cascade, US 24 west of Colorado Springs Top of Pikes Peak Mountain -14, 110' elevation 19.00 $0.39 Alabama Foley Beach Express AL 59 (in Foley) AL 180 (in Orange Beach) 8.53 $0.39 Colorado Northwest Parkway I-25, MP 228 in North Denver 96th Street (in City of Broomfield) 10.00 $0.36 Colorado E-470 I-25 & C-470; Douglas County I-25 & Northwest Parkway; Adams County 47.00 $0.30 Texas Loop 1 Parmer Lane SH 45 4.00 $0.27 Texas Manor Expressway Springdale Road Parmer Lane 5.00 $0.26 Florida Miami Airport Expressway I-95 Lejeune Rd (SR 953) 4.07 $0.26 Florida Wekiva Parkway CR 435/Mount Plymouth Road West of Old McDonald Road 3.14 $0.24 Florida Poinciana Parkway US 17/92 and Kinny Harmon Road Cypress Parkway 9.70 $0.23 Texas Fort Bend Parkway - Fort Bend County BW 8 SH 6 6.20 $0.23 Florida Orchard Pond Old Bainbridge Road Meridian Road 5.20 $0.23 Florida John Land - Apopka Expressway (SR 414) SR 429 (Western Beltway) US 441 South 5.00 $0.23 Texas SH 249 Tomball Tollway Spring-Cypress
    [Show full text]
  • TOLL ROADS STAY in THIS for the Entire Tags Work on Toll Roads Throughout Texas and Vice Versa—The REGION,” EVANS SAID
    52 Community Impact Newspaper • communityimpact.com INSIDE INFORMATION KEY GROWING OUTWARD Tomball Tollway Beltway 8 The Grand Parkway Highway As the population in Northwest Houston grows, major roadways have been built and expanded to redistribute traffic and meet the needs of drivers in the area. TOMBALL TOLLWAY The tollway spans from north of Spring 99 Cypress Road to north of FM 2920. Tolls range from 90 cents for one entrance THE GRAND PARKWAY or exit to $1.50 to travel the entire 6-mile Segments F-1 and F-2 of the span. Tolls are collected by HCTRA. Grand Parkway opened in February, THE PROJECT COST TOTALED $155 MILLION connecting Hwy. 290 in Cypress to I-45 near The Woodlands. Tolls range from 43 cents for direct connectors to $1.35 for main plaza tolls and are collected by TxDOT. TOLL g Cypress Rd. Sprin BELTWAY 8 Drive time on each segment averages 10 249 Originally planned in the 1950s, HCTRA took minutes. on the Beltway 8 project after TxDOT could not authorize funding to create Houston’s ROADSCompiled by Wendy Cawthon 45 second loop. Tolls range from 90 cents to $1.75. In Harris County, much of the toll road system is run by the Harris County Toll Road Authority. The HCTRA was Tolled portions of the road are referred to Map not to scale founded in 1983 after voters approved a $900 million as the Sam Houston Tollway. bond referendum to create the Hardy Toll Road and the Harris County Tollway. Since then, HCTRA has spent over $3 billion on the toll system, creating the Tomball LOCAL USAGE Tollway and the Sam Houston Tollway in Northwest Houston, as well as the Katy managed lanes on I-10 Since opening in April 2015, the Tomball Tollway has exceeded expectations for monthly usage as drivers look for a quicker way to travel on Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Vs. Forecasted Toll Usage : a Case Study Review
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-10/0-6044-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Actual vs. Forecasted Toll Usage: A Case Study Review July 2008; Revised August 2009 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jolanda Prozzi, Kate Flanagan, Lisa Loftus-Otway, Beth 0-6044-1 Porterfield, Khali Persad, Jorge A. Prozzi, and C. Michael Walton 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-6044 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office April 11, 2007 – June 30, 2008 P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Reliable T&R forecasts are critical to the success of toll proposals. However, a number of studies by the bond rating agencies—specifically Standard & Poor’s (S&P)—have shown that a majority of toll roads failed to meet revenue expectations in their first full year of operation. These studies alluded to the existence of an optimism bias in T&R forecasts, with an over-estimation of traffic by 20-30 percent in the first five years of operation. This uncertainty contributes to increased risks about the feasibility of toll roads, requirements for escrow accounts of up to 30 percent of the amount borrowed, and thus high interest payments (and ultimately higher costs to the users) to compensate investors for higher risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Morning Mr
    TESTIM ONY Interim Charge 2: TxDOT, MPOs and Tolling Authorities Testimony Before the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director of Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation October 13, 2010 Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee October 13, 2010 Interim Charge 2: Review and make recommendations relating to the Texas Department of Transportation's organizational structure and working relationship with local governments, Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Regional Tolling Authorities and Regional Mobility Authorities. Introduction Over the years, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has worked diligently to forge a strong working relationship with its transportation partners across the State. This relationship is most necessary as TxDOT and its partners work together to craft a transportation plan that considers the State's needs related to urban mobility, statewide connectivity, and both urban and rural transportation needs. TxDOT relies heavily upon both Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) and tolling authorities across the State for their expertise to achieve this goal. Metropolitan Planning Organizations In 1962, the United States Congress passed legislation that required the creation of MPOs for any urbanized area with a population greater than 50,000. Federal funding for transportation projects and programs are channeled through this planning process. Congress created MPOs in order to ensure that existing and future expenditures of governmental funds for transportation projects and programs are based on a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive planning process. Statewide and metropolitan transportation planning processes are governed by federal law (23 U.S.C. § 134–135). Additionally, public access to participation in the planning process is required by federal law to achieve transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • BW8 72Ppi.Pdf
    Sam Houston Parkway/Tollway, Beltway 8 Even before the alignment of Loop 610 had been finalized, the city of Houston was formulating plans for a second loop. It was a remarkable act of vision and foresight to rec- ognize the future importance of loop highways in today’s predominant suburb-to-suburb transportation patterns. However, the first wave of freeway construction in Houston from the 1950s to the 1970s came and went with very little progress on the Beltway. The age of the Houston Beltway arrived with the second wave of Houston freeway con- struction, which started in the 1980s. By 1996 the entire loop had been constructed in some form—freeway, tollway, or frontage road. Completion of the South Belt main lanes in 1997 left only one segment without main lanes. The phenomenal success of the Sam Houston Tollway, the toll main lanes of Beltway 8, even brought traffic congestion to the western and northern sections of the tollway. Although the main lanes of Beltway 8 are, for the most part, not very interesting, the Beltway has one of the nation’s most impressive collections of modern four- and five-level freeway-to-freeway stack interchanges. The Beltway is also unusual in that its tollway sec- tions have continuous toll-free frontage roads. Origins Beltway 8 had its origins in a 1952 report by the City Beltway 8 (Sam Houston Parkway/Tollway) of Houston Planning Department, Proposed Location for Designated as freeway 1960 An Outer Belt Drive for Metropolitan Houston. The report First freeway section open 1970 (overpasses only) was prepared as a basis for fixing a location for a mini- 1982 (toll bridge) mum 120-foot-wide (37 m) thoroughfare located four to five miles (6 to 8 km) beyond the city limits, which were Freeway/tollway complete Scheduled 2007 generally located near Loop 610 at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Elimination of Toll Roads
    Report on the Elimination of Toll Roads HB 2612, 84th Texas Legislature Provided to: Legislative Budget Board House Committee on Transportation Senate Committee on Transportation September 1, 2016 f Contents Section Page Executive Summary 1 Section 1 – Debt Service on Bonds Issued for Toll Projects 6 Section 2 – Bonds Appropriate for Accelerated or Lump-Sum Payment 12 of Debt Service Section 3 – Plan to Eliminate Toll Roads 16 Appendices Appendix A – Index of Toll Road Bonds A Appendix B – Assumptions Regarding Toll Road Debt Service Analysis B Appendix C – Toll Road Project Actual vs. Projected Traffic C Appendix D – House Bill 2612 D f Executive Summary House Bill 2612, 84th Legislature, Regular Session, 2015, requires the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to prepare a report on the feasibility of eliminating toll roads in the State of Texas. This report is divided into three sections, which correspond to the requirements of the legislation: . Section 1. “lists the amount of debt service on bonds issued for each toll project in this state;” . Section 2. “identifies, based on criteria provided by the Texas Transportation Commission, bonds that would be appropriate for accelerated or complete lump-sum payment of debt service;” . Section 3. “proposes a plan to eliminate all toll roads in this state, except for tolls on roads constructed, operated, or maintained only with proceeds from the issuance of bonds by a toll project entity other than the department, by methods including: – “the accelerated or complete lump-sum payment of debt service on bonds identified under Subdivision (1); or – “requiring, as a condition on receipt of state financial assistance, a commitment by a toll project entity to eliminate toll collection on a project for which the financial assistance is provided.” The report includes a review of the 53 toll roads and 28 financial tolling systems in the state, excluding international bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris County Budget Process Training for FY 2021-2022
    Budget Hearings FY 2021-22 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 6 – 13, 2021 Version 3 Document Control January 6 - 13, 2021 Justice 1 Day 1 Safety 2 Day 2 Governance & Customer Service Flooding Environment Day 3 3 Transportation Public Health Governance & Customer Service, cont. Day 4 4 Economic Opportunity, Public Health, cont., and Housing 3 READER’S GUIDE: GENERAL FUND BUDGET FORMS This guide was developed to give readers an understanding of the FY 2021-22 budget documents included in this supplement. Harris County departments and agencies completed a set of budget forms that provide a comprehensive view into the department’s structure, resource allocation, services, goals and objectives, and performance metrics. Form Title Required Background Template Yes Form 1 Divisions Yes Form 2 Org Chart Yes Form 3 Goals & Objectives Yes Form 4a Services Detail Yes Form 4b Performance Metrics Yes If requesting additional Form 5a Budget Request - Summary funding If requesting new Form 5b Budget Request - New Positions positions If requesting additional Form 5c Budget Request - Detail funding Form 6 Long-Term Needs If applicable Update on Expansion Funding Form 7 If applicable included in FY2020-21 Budget Form 8 Supplemental Revenue If applicable Below you will find a brief description of the information included in each of the budget forms. Background Template – The background template provides a broad departmental overview and captures narrative related to the mission, vision, goals, operations, and equity and diversity strategies of the department. Form 1 – This form provides an overview of the department’s divisions and services and includes a breakdown of budget amounts and headcount at the division level.
    [Show full text]
  • National Inventory of Specialty Lanes and Highways: Technical Report February 2021 6
    Publication No. FHWA-HOP-20-043 February 2021 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high- quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. The FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Non-Binding Contents The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. Cover Image Source: Texas A&M Transportation Institute TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-20-043 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date National Inventory of Specialty Lanes and Highways: Technical Report February 2021 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Nick Wood, Vivek Gupta, James P. Cardenas, Jinuk Hwang, Deepak Report No. Raghunathan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Toll Authority Cooperation and Coordination
    Project Summary Report 0-4055-S Project 0-4055: Guidelines for TxDOT—Regional Tollway Authority Cooperation Author: Katherine F. Turnbull Enhancing TxDOT—Regional Toll Authority Cooperation and Coordination The Texas Department of by the Harris County Toll Road in 2001 allows for the creation Transportation (TxDOT) and Authority (HCTRA). The North of regional mobility authorities other agencies continue to Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) (RMAs) to construct and operate explore new and innovative operates the North Dallas toll facilities. House Bill 3588, methods to address concerns Tollway, the President George passed in 2003, provides RMAs related to traffi c congestion, Bush Turnpike, the Mountain with additional authority, mobility, and accessibility. Creek Lake Toll Bridge, and the creates new opportunities for Expanding the use of toll Addison Tunnel. The Fort Bend toll facilities, and promotes facilities in the state is one County Toll Road Authority collaboration among agencies. approach receiving increased emphasis. Interest in toll roads goes back to the early 1840s, when the Republic of Texas authorized the Houston and Austin Turnpike Company to build a toll road between the two communities. It was not until the 1950s, however, Photo courtesy of DeWitt Garth, HCTRA Photo courtesy of DeWitt with the passage of the Texas Sam Houston Toll Road plaza in Houston Turnpike Act, that the fi rst toll road was built in the state. The (FBCTRA) is developing two Enhanced coordination Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike was toll roads. The TxDOT Texas among TxDOT, toll authorities, opened in 1957 and operated as a Turnpike Authority (TTA) and RMAs is critical to help toll road until 1977 when it was Division is constructing the ensure that new facilities are turned over to the Texas Highway Central Texas Turnpike Project.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview
    HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF HOUSTON HOUSTON WATER DIVISION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview The designated property (the Site) is located at 14330 East Hardy Road in Houston, Harris County, Texas near the intersection of East Hardy and Pinafore Lane (Attachment C-1). The Site is part of an active industrial facility that manufactures and refurbishes metal seated ball valves. The Site is owned by MOGAS Industries, Inc. (MOGAS). The size of the designated property is 1.141 acres. MOGAS was founded in 1973 and the facility has operated at this location for almost 50 years. The potentially responsible party (PRP) for reported groundwater impacts at the designated property is MOGAS, the current Site owner and occupant. Based on site assessment activities performed to date and information provided by MOGAS, the point of origin of contamination on the Site is believed to be from various historic maintenance and/or operational activities that were conducted within a building that was renovated and extended in March 2015. This area is located in the northwest corner of the facility where the building extension was constructed. Equipment that had been used within that historic building area that likely contained the source material (believed to be a chlorinated solvent product) is no longer used and is no longer present at the facility. Only above ground storage vessels were used to contain the chlorinated solvent, no underground storage tanks were used to hold these chemicals. Based on the removal of the historic equipment and changed practices at the facility, it is concluded that the source of the plume has been removed.
    [Show full text]