"Herpetofauna of Oak Ridge Area."

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

.p o RNC.<,7 .Jiiiiiire . , .. - ' [3.., *i . '& " J .) 7/C .f q }g Q - i '" - . - y' o - - ___ ORNL.3653. 't c |;,, UC.48 - Bielegy and Me ' ' TID.4500 (34th ed. REFEREflCE 2-35 6 I . t ! - . .t * , ,e . !. THE HERPETOFAUNA OF THE CAK RIDGE AREA ~}^i.'- i ti R. M. Jchnson s ' , , p ?.... , . - e . 'a l .a: . *)f* J*.*tf t if 9 . ' .85 - . p* e ' W C&fi . %' g. ey cdev ; : , , %$ 9pto ur .s s <- o .y-=- s%,<=. o ;u n ___ II G.k ' e .a wt . i, ;j f'$~MS):if%--~L.$, ;A s o1.. f =;'Q::.+Eli(. t - ]s- < a ~ . n= ~ h . 9:!;;s-rf C L. %- s. ,, % ~- ~, ~g. ;"3 - a - l " )< ,\.:-m5W?.;; ..- ! ,- n _ .' | H o r - %P, O AK RIDGE N AT1014 AL L ABOR ATORY .Vj '.g t(e,C ' .hl t ENERGT cperated by ( ' (Er. i, | [.*jt" .ti UNION C ARBIDE CORPOR ATION i f or the | -$N,. ) | I U.S. ATGMIC E N E RGY C O.V. MISSION ' - . ~:.* 4 .h' . tih- > . - '8201060379 811231 | PDR ADGCK 05000 G . ' ' " ' ' ' e __ _ _ . .s- * e * . * .. , . 0 .- . e . * O . e - e . e e . i I I e } ' Petened in USA. Peise 12.00. A.e.lebte fee es e Close.agne se fee Fedwet c.on, he..eael Seceee of 1seadeeds, l [ Sciene fie ead Teebe.s et tale I * U.5 2eere.... el Co...eee, Se..a s t.eid. v.eg.eie . LEGAL MOTICE 4 No.ehee ene Va.eed $ ewes, ' - TMe eeene .es e.eewed es e. ess eeae e8 Co...--iew eseaneced .we. g ase ehe Co. s e ea. a* e, ee,sen ee , e. be eef es me ca...e s.em A. teeken ea. we e ** , w eeresearse ea, ese eemed w a.el.ee. ..e4 eeeeece en the useene. ..#,.w. eeewe, e ene, ne ese ed S e feeea u, w esele:aese e8 *e e.aee.aee .. n. ' .a *.e .e, sw . de. age I e*, .a8we-c.... ence e. eee %d, w wesess e.setend eeeeee pe. evel, =4 e.s e e; w S. Asse.es say t. sed.e.ee ..es .esseer *e the ese of, e fee de.eee s resete.., dee. ehe ese of , i -, . .. ees.e,e s. ..ed. ee eeue.e 4 wi. sed .. ..e .we. ..se. '' .astese s e, e In w ! 4e seee i= et ... "eeesen ue.*g en seheif of no Ca ' sensesseen el me Co .e s.ea, e e e evee e8 see*i sea *esew, ee me eseem Aw e.s h e.ofe,ee - se esaeemen of **e ca .es.ea. w e 6 vee of seen ==eewa seeeee e. e.s .aeees. w .u.ea, . w seaweee ..en no Co e. de s e u. ... p, .af. eee s.ew ee h.e e e:ee w h.. e.eter e .. h seense.eu,w. k. h .e . e . m- e . D e O . , . N - . - - . -_- - --_--_--,____m__ _ _ _ _ .- -- ._ . , . ' , ,- - ' ORNL.3653 , r 5 . - . Centreet No. W.7403.emg.26 . ' HEALTH PHYSICS OlVISION > THE HERPETOFAUHA 0F THE OAK RIDGE AREA ; . - R. M. Johnsen* . , . - e e 'Present address: Department of Biology, Asheville.Biltmore College, Asheville, North Carolina. Werk performed under Subcentreet No. 2234 with Tennessee Poly. technic Institute. ' . "i l ' I DECEMBER 1964 . s e . 0AK R10CE N ATIONAl. L A80RATORY cok Ridge. Teaaessee p .e.,e..a 6, ( UMl0N CARBIOE CORPOR ATION t e fee the * U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMIS5lON , I . - . - . _ . _ - . .- . .. __ _ __ _________________ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .._ __ _ ^ . , , . - 7 . o , * . e * . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report describes research conducted under the direction of S. f. Auerbech, Chief, Radiation Ecology Section Health Physics Division. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Financial support was - received from Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Tennessee Polytechnic Institute under Subcon- tract No. 2284 * Appreciatica is expressed to S. I. Auerbach, Paul B. Dunaway, R. C. Early, Fred Taylor, J. A. Payne, B. E. Jacobs, and T. P. O'Farrell, all of the Radiation Ecology Section, for their many courtesies, helpful suggestions, and assistance in obtaining specimens. Ronald Quarles and Joseph F. Webb, senior biology students at Tennessee Polytechnic Institute, gave invaluable as- sistance in the field and laboratory. John R. Warren, Chairman of the Department of Biology, and . i the Administration of Tennessee Polytechnic Institute receive my thanks for enabling me to engage , in this research. , I ' .e - . , . O s {; ill s ! , _ _ _ . " > twe -y,- ,c---+ n- - *e1- T-* 3% T - - % . , . - . , - . - . u _ e ' . CONTENTS P - - . - .--- -111 * - - - - . - - . = ACKNOWLEDG11ENTS - . s ,.- -.- - --- - -. I ABSTRACT _. _ - _ . ~ - ' --- 1 I. INTRODUCTION ... ... - . - - . - - . - - . ~ . - . - - -- , - _ 2 . II. MATERIALS AND 51ETHODS._.- . .. 2 A. The Study Area . -. 2 B. Methods of Colleeting.. - 3, - --- . C. Habitat Types . ' . 5 ** D. Identification and Presentation of Species. .. .__.- -. .- . 6 E. Refereoce Colleetion . - . , . , . ~ . - . 6 * Bl. THE HERPETOFAUN A . .. .. - = . - 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenc!ature.. .. ~ ... B. C1 ass Amphibia. Order Caudata.. ... - . ? 1. Fami1y Ambystomatidae .. .. ...-.. .. - - . 7 2. Fami1y SaIamandridae .. - . - . _ 7 3. Fami1y P1ethadontidae. .. .. .. - . ....- 8 - - . ... C. C1 ass Amphibia: Ordet Anura.. .- . ---- 8 * 1. Family Petobatidce... .. - . ....- 9 2. Family Bufonidae . - . - . - . .. .. 9 3. Family Nylidae . - ' . ... ..- .. 10 4. Family .ilicrohylidae .; .. .. - - -. 10 S. Family Ranidae .. .. .. .. - . .... 11 D. C1 ass Reptifia: Order Testudineta ... .-- - .-. .. 11 1. Family Chelydridae. .. ~ . 12 2. Family Test:rdi.:!dae.. .... ..e . o - . .. 14 3. Fami1y Trionychidae... _ = . - E. Class Reptilia: Order Squamata- fuborder Lacertifia.. ..; -...... , . IS , . ' . .. .. 1S ' 1. Fami1y Iguanidae... :........... 15 --..: . 2. Family Teiidae . ' - .- 15 3. Family Seincidae.. .. .. F. Class Reptilia: Order Squamata: Suborder Serpentes - . ~ . ..... - Iti .. =16 .s 1. Family Colubridae. - = - -. - . - . -. 21 2. Family Viperidae.. .. - . ~ . - . -= 22 IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ... .. - . 22 A. The Herpetofauna . .- . ~ . - - I - -. - ' 22 B. Relative Abundanee . .... _ . |. i e - -- 25 ' C. Populations Suitable for Field Investigations . ) . 26 ' . .. ... V. LITERATURE CITED.. , , . 4 ' V s y " /.. ' , ,\ ) f *- _ W- 3p * ~ -un' s., 7 . v- , ' , 7 - . ' g / 6' . .- THE HERPETOFAUNA 0F THE OAK RIDGE AREA . - R. M. Johnson . ABSTRACT , The herpetofauna of the Oak Ridge area was investigated (a) to ascertain. the _ kinds of amphibians and reptiles (herptiles) occurring in the area,(b) to evaluate - habitat preferences of the herptiles, (c) to evaluate the suitability of the various species population's for ecological investigations, and (d) to prepare a reference . ,i collection of herptiles of the area. Collecting was performed by (a) prowling about the various kinds of habitats . .- by day and by night and collecting by hand, (b) walking transects by day and by ' ' . night and collecting by hand, (c) trapping with hardware-cloth drift fences and 'flinnel traps in terrestrial habitats, (d) using dipnet, funnel traps, and hoop nets in aquatic habitats, and (e) driving roads by day and by night. The most productive * * method of collecting in terrestrial habitate and streams was hand collecting; in fluvial and pond habitats it was with dipnet, funnel trap, and hoop net. * The numbers of monotypic species of herptiles collected are as fo!!ows: sala- manders,3; anurans,2; turtles,2; lizards. 4; and snakes. 2. The numbers of poly- , typic species collected are as follows (numbers in parentheses are subspecies rep. , resented): salamanders, 4 (4); anurans,10 (12); turtles, 8 (10); lizards,1 (1); ' and snakes,15 (18). The largest numbers of species and specimens were collected - la flood-plain and pond habitats; the least numbers were collected in p'ne planta- . dans. Herptiles judged as o: curring in populations of sufficient size, seasonal , availability, and ease of sampling for extensive field and laboratory investigations , are as follows: Desmognathus fuscus: Hyla versicolor; Acris crepitans: Rana clamitans: R. palustris: Chrysemys picta: Pseudemys scripta; Natrix septemvittata; and N. sipedon. y A reference collection containing specimens of each species and subspecies collected was prepared and deposited with the Radiation Ecology Section, Health Physics Division. |b * 3,\ l ,' in ' l. INTRODUCTION q. ' Two surveys have been made of the herpetofauna of eastern Tennessee (Johnson,1958; King, , o 1939). The Oak Ridge area was omitted from both of these studies. Thus, the herpetofauna of the . - Oak Ridge area could only be inferred. Recognizing the, desirability of a knowledge of the herpeto- fa'ina of the Oak Ridge Area, S.1. Auerbach, Chief, and Paul B. Dunaway, Mammalogist, Radiation i Ecology Section, suggested the survey herein reported. s- , The objectives of this survey were to (a) ascertain the species and subspecies of amphibians s , t 4 and keptiles (herptiles) occurring in the Oak Ridge area, (b) evaluate habitat preferences of the _ herptnes, (c) evaluate the suitability of the various species populations for ecological investiga- ! - " ~ ' tions, and (d) prepare a reference collection of herptiles. 1 : A.. = I i . i ~ / 4 , , t e.-_ r1 < - - _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ , . * * . 2 . 11. MATERIALS AND METHODS . A. The Study Areo , , * The entire Oak Ridge area (see Map S-16A,1959, Oak Ridge Area) was included in the survey. Collec' tion sites were selected on the bases of suggestions of P. B. Dunaway, R. C. Early, F. Taylor, other personnel of the Radiation Ecology Section, and of past experience with the co!!ect- _ ing of herptiles in eastern Tennessee. Collections were made in each of the major recogni:ed types of habitats and many of the estab- - lished Ecology Study areas. No effort was made to spend equal numbers of trap-hours or man-hours in each kind of habitat, but the number of hours spent in each was recorded, as were the species and numbers of individuals collected. The habitat bordering the road was recorded when specimens were encountered on the roads.
Recommended publications
  • Nyika and Vwaza Reptiles & Amphibians Checklist
    LIST OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS OF NYIKA NATIONAL PARK AND VWAZA MARSH WILDLIFE RESERVE This checklist of all reptile and amphibian species recorded from the Nyika National Park and immediate surrounds (both in Malawi and Zambia) and from the Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve was compiled by Dr Donald Broadley of the Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, in November 2013. It is arranged in zoological order by scientific name; common names are given in brackets. The notes indicate where are the records are from. Endemic species (that is species only known from this area) are indicated by an E before the scientific name. Further details of names and the sources of the records are available on request from the Nyika Vwaza Trust Secretariat. REPTILES TORTOISES & TERRAPINS Family Pelomedusidae Pelusios rhodesianus (Variable Hinged Terrapin) Vwaza LIZARDS Family Agamidae Acanthocercus branchi (Branch's Tree Agama) Nyika Agama kirkii kirkii (Kirk's Rock Agama) Vwaza Agama armata (Eastern Spiny Agama) Nyika Family Chamaeleonidae Rhampholeon nchisiensis (Nchisi Pygmy Chameleon) Nyika Chamaeleo dilepis (Common Flap-necked Chameleon) Nyika(Nchenachena), Vwaza Trioceros goetzei nyikae (Nyika Whistling Chameleon) Nyika(Nchenachena) Trioceros incornutus (Ukinga Hornless Chameleon) Nyika Family Gekkonidae Lygodactylus angularis (Angle-throated Dwarf Gecko) Nyika Lygodactylus capensis (Cape Dwarf Gecko) Nyika(Nchenachena), Vwaza Hemidactylus mabouia (Tropical House Gecko) Nyika Family Scincidae Trachylepis varia (Variable Skink) Nyika,
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1–10, 2021 Copyright 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes 1,2 1 1 HIRAL NAIK, MIMMIE M. KGADITSE, AND GRAHAM J. ALEXANDER 1School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. PO Wits, 2050, Gauteng, South Africa ABSTRACT.—The Colubroidea includes all venomous and some nonvenomous snakes, many of which have extraordinary dental morphology and functional capabilities. It has been proposed that the ancestral condition of the Colubroidea is venomous with tubular fangs. The venom system includes the production of venomous secretions by labial glands in the mouth and usually includes fangs for effective delivery of venom. Despite significant research on the evolution of the venom system in snakes, limited research exists on the driving forces for different fang and dental morphology at a broader phylogenetic scale. We assessed the patterns of fang and dental condition in the Lamprophiidae, a speciose family of advanced snakes within the Colubroidea, and we related fang and dental condition to diet. The Lamprophiidae is the only snake family that includes front-fanged, rear-fanged, and fangless species. We produced an ancestral reconstruction for the family and investigated the pattern of diet and fangs within the clade. We concluded that the ancestral lamprophiid was most likely rear-fanged and that the shift in dental morphology was associated with changes in diet. This pattern indicates that fang loss, and probably venom loss, has occurred multiple times within the Lamprophiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
    Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian and Reptile Checklist
    KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS ___ Eastern Rat Snake (Pantherophis alleghaniensis) – BLUE RIDGE (NC‐C, VA‐C) Habitat: Varies from rocky timbered hillsides to flat farmland. The following codes refer to an animal’s abundance in ___ Eastern Hog‐nosed Snake (Heterodon platirhinos) – PARKWAY suitable habitat along the parkway, not the likelihood of (NC‐R, VA‐U) Habitat: Sandy or friable loam soil seeing it. Information on the abundance of each species habitats at lower elevation. AMPHIBIAN & comes from wildlife sightings reported by park staff and ___ Eastern Kingsnake (Lampropeltis getula) – (NC‐U, visitors, from other agencies, and from park research VA‐U) Habitat: Generalist at low elevations. reports. ___ Northern Mole Snake (Lampropeltis calligaster REPTILE C – COMMON rhombomaculata) – (VA‐R) Habitat: Mixed pine U – UNCOMMON forests and open fields under logs or boards. CHECKLIST R – RARE ___ Eastern Milk Snake (Lampropeltis triangulum) – (NC‐ U, VA‐U) Habitat: Woodlands, grassy balds, and * – LISTED – Any species federally or state listed as meadows. Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern. ___ Northern Water Snake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon) – (NC‐C, VA‐C) Habitat: Wetlands, streams, and lakes. Non‐native – species not historically present on the ___ Rough Green Snake (Opheodrys aestivus) – (NC‐R, parkway that have been introduced (usually by humans.) VA‐R) Habitat: Low elevation forests. ___ Smooth Green Snake (Opheodrys vernalis) – (VA‐R) NC – NORTH CAROLINA Habitat: Moist, open woodlands or herbaceous Blue Ridge Red Cope's Gray wetlands under fallen debris. Salamander Treefrog VA – VIRGINIA ___ Northern Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus) – (VA‐R) Habitat: Abandoned fields If you see anything unusual while on the parkway, please and dry mountain ridges with sandier soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Issue 12, 30 April 2012 ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Issue 12, 30 April 2012 ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology Hoser 2012 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 9:1-64. Available online at www.herp.net Contents on pageCopyright- 2. Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Issue 12, 30 April 2012 Australasian Journal of Herpetology CONTENTS ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A New Genus of Coral Snake from Japan (Serpentes:Elapidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 3-5. A revision of the Asian Pitvipers, referred to the genus Cryptelytrops Cope, 1860, with the creation of a new genus Adelynhoserea to accommodate six divergent species (Serpentes:Viperidae:Crotalinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 6-8. A division of the South-east Asian Ratsnake genus Coelognathus (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 9-11. A new genus of Asian Snail-eating Snake (Serpentes:Pareatidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 10-12-15. The dissolution of the genus Rhadinophis Vogt, 1922 (Sepentes:Colubrinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 16-17. Three new species of Stegonotus from New Guinea (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 18-22. A new genus and new subgenus of snakes from the South African region (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 23-25. A division of the African Genus Psammophis Boie, 1825 into 4 genera and four further subgenera (Serpentes: Psammophiinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 26-31. A division of the African Tree Viper genus Atheris Cope, 1860 into four subgenera (Serpentes:Viperidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 32-35. A new Subgenus of Giant Snakes (Anaconda) from South America (Serpentes: Boidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 36-39.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa – Cape & Kruger III Trip Report 4Th to 14Th December 2015
    Best of South Africa – Cape & Kruger III Trip Report 4th to 14th December 2015 Lion by Wayne Jones Trip report by tour leader Wayne Jones RBT Trip Report Best of SA – Cape & Kruger III 2015 2 In the first week of the last month of the year, we began our 10-day exploration of South Africa’s most popular destinations, the Western Cape and Kruger National Park. Everyone had arrived the day before, which afforded us an extra morning – an opportunity we couldn’t pass up! After a scrumptious breakfast overlooking False Bay we followed the coast south along the Cape Peninsula until we reached Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve (Cape Point). We had hardly entered the park when a splendid male Cape Sugarbird grabbed our attention as he sat feeding on big orange “pincushions” and a male Orange- breasted Sunbird sat nicely for pictures before realising he needed another nectar fix. Cape Siskin and Common Buzzard also gave good views nearby, along with a number of spiky, pitch- coloured Black Girdled Lizards. After turning towards Olifantsbos we happened upon four (Cape) Mountain Zebra right alongside the road. This species is not common in the park so we Mountain Zebra by Wayne Jones were very fortunate to have such excellent views of these beauties. Equally beautiful and scarce were the Blesbok (Bontebok) we found closer to the beach. But back to the birds, which were surprisingly plentiful and easy to see, probably thanks to the lack of strong winds that one is normally blasted away by, in the area! Grey-backed and Levaillant’s Cisticolas, Cape Grassbird, Cape Bulbul, Fiscal Flycatcher, Alpine Swift, Rock Kestrel, Peregrine Falcon, White-necked Raven, Karoo Prinia, Malachite Sunbird and Yellow Bishop showed well in the fynbos areas while African Oystercatcher, Greater Crested, Common and Sandwich Terns, Kelp and Hartlaub’s Gulls, Egyptian Goose, White-breasted Cormorant and Sacred Ibis were found along the shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Wildlife Allowed List
    Saskatchewan Captive Wildlife Allowed Species List (as of June 1, 2021) AMPHIBIANS (CLASS AMPHIBIA) Class (Common Name) Scientific Name Family Ambystomatidae Axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum Marble Salamander Ambystoma opacum Family Bombinatoridae Oriental Fire-Bellied Toad Bombina orientalis Family Bufonidae Green Toad Anaxyrus debilis Black Indonesian Toad Bufo asper Indonesian Toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus Family Ceratophryidae Surinam Horned Frog Ceratophrys cornuta Chacoan Horned Frog Ceratophrys cranwelli Argentine Horned Frog Ceratophrys ornata Budgett’s Frog Lepidobatrachus laevis Family Dendrobatidae Dart Poison Frog Dendrobates auratus Yellow-banded Poison Dart Frog Dendrobates leucomelas Dyeing Dart Frog Dendrobates tinctorius Yellow-striped Poison Frog Dendrobates truncatus Family Hylidae Clown Tree Frog Dendropsophus leucophyllatus Bird Poop Tree Frog Dendropsophus marmoratus Barking Tree Frog Dryophytes gratiosus Squirrel Tree Frog Dryophytes squirellus Green Tree Frog Dryophytes cinereus Cuban Tree Frog Osteopilus septentrionalis Haitian Giant Tree Frog Osteopilus vastus White’s Tree Frog Ranoidea caerulea Brazilian Black and White Milky Frog Trachycephalus resinifictrix Hyperoliidae African Reed Frog Hyperolius concolor Family Mantellidae Baron’s Mantella Mantella baroni Brown Mantella Mantella betsileo Family Megophryidae Long-nosed Horned Frog Megophrys nasuta Family Microhylidae Tomato Frog Dyscophus guineti Chubby Frog Kaloula pulchra Banded Rubber Frog Phrynomantis bifasciatus Emerald Hopper Frog Scaphiophryne madagascariensis
    [Show full text]
  • Animals Close to the Sea Shore
    Animals close to the sea shore Bushbuck Caracal Medium sized antelope Larger in size in this area go down to the beach at due to minimal compe- night to feed. tition for food. They are solitary animals and highly territorial. Black and white markings on face. Dassie Duiker and Grysbok Closely related to ele- Often go into the water phants, due to their toe for salt and to rid structures. Frequently themselves of ticks. seen on rocks and cliffs. Eat seeds and fruit. Grey Mongoose Large spotted Genet Lesser and Grey mon- Slim, short-legged carni- goose have long bushy vore with spotted coat and tails, their legs and feet long bushy tail. Preys on a are black. They are active wide variety of creatures by day. from insect to nestling birds. Porcupine Striped Mouse Nocturnal rodents, usually Four distinct stripes solitary but can occur in running down its back. pairs. Charge backwards They are active by day. with quills erect when threatened. birds close to the sea shore African Darter African Hoopoe A spear feeder, they can The long curved bill is used be seen diving for fish for probing the ground for along the coast. worms and insects. African Penguins Black Harrier Now declared endangered The rarest species of species. harrier in the world. They soar low over the ground to catch their prey. birds close to the sea shore Black Oystercatcher Blue Crane Highly endangered. Eating National bird of South mainly shellfish. They nest Africa, over 1m high and in hollow sand. Found in occur in flocks when they pairs or small groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Brants' Whistling
    Parotomys brantsii – Brants’ Whistling Rat Goegap Nature Reserve and Tswalu Kalahari Reserve), and because there are no major documented threats that could cause range-wide decline. They are also not exploited by humans. However, this is a species we need to flag as being potentially threatened due to projected aridification from climate change and overgrazing in some areas. This may affect the forage resources on which this species depends, and may be exacerbated by the sensitivity of this rodent to high ambient temperatures that may limit foraging behaviour under hotter conditions. Given that this species displays a patchy distribution and undergoes population irruptions, it may qualify for listing under the C criterion in the future, and will need to be Derek Keats reassessed once more data are generated. We recommend that more research and long-term monitoring of subpopulation trends, geographic distribution and Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* threat level are undertaken. National Red List status (2004) Least Concern Regional population effects: The bulk of the population Reasons for change No change exists in South Africa, so extra-regional rescue effect is minimal. It is a rapid disperser over short distances Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern (< 1 km), especially into areas that were recently TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None overgrazed. Long distance dispersal ability is unknown, and would be dependent on corridors of suitable habitat. None CITES listing The successful colonisation of poorly vegetated mine Endemic Near dumps (Desmet & Cowling 1999) suggests an ability to establish in harsh habitats provided deep soils are *Watch-list Threat available.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa, 2011
    South Africa, November/December 2011 Report by Sjef Öllers Introduction Our second holiday in South Africa was mainly set up to see five mammals: aardwolf, aardvark, black-footed cat, caracal and brown hyena. We managed to see the first three and dipped on the last two. Nevertheless, I was very glad to see aardvark and black- footed cat, which I thought would be the most difficult ones. In addition we had very good sightings of African wildcat, cheetah and leopard. Completely unexpected was the bizarre Cape dune mole-rat in West Coast national park. I also wanted to see a decent cross-section of the South-African endemic and near- endemic bird species in the western half of the country. I had about fifty target species and saw most of these. Some highlights were good numbers of Ludwig’s bustard and black harrier, a small flock of rosy-faced lovebirds in Augrabies, white-starred robin, narina trogon and both cuckoo-shrikes in the Wilderness area, Cape rock-jumper at Rooiels, and Knysna woodpecker and Cape griffon vulture in De Hoop. In total we identified more than 50 mammals and about 300 bird species. Bontebok (de Hoop) 1 Travel Information A car was hired through www.drivesouthafrica.co.za, which was easy and efficient. The car was provided by Europcar. I had asked for a 4WD Daihatsu Terios. When we left Cape Town, we had noticed that it had the differential lock button to switch on the 4WD and nothing was said when the car was delivered, so we assumed it was fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Snake Some Facts
    Mole Snake Some Facts Scientific name: Pseudaspis cana Taxonomy: Serpentes - Family: Lamprophiidae Is found where: Most of Southern Africa (Common in Gauteng and Mpumalanga) Venomous: HARMLESS - BUT IT CAN GIVE A NASTY BITE Venom type: Non-venomous Venom effects: The snake is not venomous, but be careful for its bite, it is foul tempered which hiss loudly and strike with gaping mouth, this cause them often being mistaken as venomous. They have pin-sharp teeth and is capable of quite serious bites that may even require stitches. Mole snakes have strong teeth with an edge on the back of each tooth, like the blade of a knife, and when they bite they often move the head up and down like a tin opener and can do real damage. Distinctive attributes: In mature individuals, the body is mostly one colour, and may vary from yellow to brown to grey, and in some cases, solid black. The young have dark markings and spots that are gradually lost as the individual ages. Colour may be related to geography; in the south, most specimens are black, whereas specimens found in the northern part of their range are brown, reddish-brown, grey, or yellow. The head is small with pointed snout, and are not distinct from the body Length: The average length is between 1 to 1,5m in total (In the Cape peninsula some were found reaching 2 m in length) Diet / Feeding: Their diet consist of hunting moles, but also include other species of rodents, nestling birds (especially ground dwelling species) and eggs..
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Herpetological Survey of Ngonye Falls and Surrounding Regions in South-Western Zambia 1,2,*Darren W
    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 11(1) [Special Section]: 24–43 (e148). Preliminary herpetological survey of Ngonye Falls and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia 1,2,*Darren W. Pietersen, 3Errol W. Pietersen, and 4,5Werner Conradie 1Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, SOUTH AFRICA 2Research Associate, Herpetology Section, Department of Vertebrates, Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 413, Pretoria, 0001, SOUTH AFRICA 3P.O. Box 1514, Hoedspruit, 1380, SOUTH AFRICA 4Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), P.O. Box 13147, Humewood, 6013, SOUTH AFRICA 5School of Natural Resource Management, George Campus, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, George, SOUTH AFRICA Abstract.—The herpetofauna of Zambia has been relatively well-studied, although most surveys were conducted decades ago. In western Zambia in particular, surveys were largely restricted to a few centers, particularly those along the Zambezi River. We here report on the herpetofauna of the Ngonye Falls and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia. We recorded 18 amphibian, one crocodile, two chelonian, 22 lizard, and 19 snake species, although a number of additional species are expected to occur in the region based on their known distribution and habitat preferences. We also provide three new reptile country records for Zambia (Long-tailed Worm Lizard, Dalophia longicauda, Anchieta’s Worm Lizard, Monopeltis anchietae, and Zambezi Rough-scaled Lizard, Ichnotropis grandiceps), and report on the second specimen of Schmitz’s Legless Skink, Acontias schmitzi, a species described in 2012 and until now known only from the holotype. This record also represents a 140 km southward range extension for the species.
    [Show full text]