TITLE: No. 1. Mark Rothko, 1964 NAME: Virginia Medina León

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TITLE: No. 1. Mark Rothko, 1964 NAME: Virginia Medina León TITLE: No. 1. Mark Rothko, 1964 NAME: Virginia Medina León DATE: 28.4.2015 WORD COUNT: 1.250 words Abstract Mark Rothko, artist and philosopher of his time, has often been seeing as mysterious and contradictory. One needs to be cautious while approaching his paintings: a “house with many man- sions” as de Kooning once remarked. Nevertheless his fascinanting world is full of secrets and intimate emotions where every aspect of his life is reflected.(Fig.1) This revolutionary artist strongly committed with colour is proposed to connect with the human psy- che almost like a catharsis. Rothko, a portraitist of the human soul, uses the paths of contemplation, meditation and introspection as a way to reach a trascendental state. Fig.1 Contents Introduction p.1 Main body p.2 Conclusion p.10 Bibliography p.11 List of illustrations p.12 Introduction I have always been interested in how the basic human emotions are represented in art and design, how something so intangible can be translated to a surface, without losing its intensity. This inquietude took me to explore into the world and thoughts of Mark Rothko’s, known worldwide for its long beauty expressions of feelings. After searching on many of his classic paintings I discovered the one which I felt more identified by the messages where hidden in it. The No. 1 artwork, executed in 1964 and actually exhibited in the National Gallery of Art, Washin- gon, DC, USA. A canvas of 266.5 x 203.2 cm, done in mixed tecnhique and belonging to the Abstract Expressionism. The researching process was not difficult when it comes to a such important artist but it was the selection of the material. Trying to discard the banal and focusing on what I was looking: emotions and feelings. I found most of my research by secondary resources, biographies books, essays, di- fferent museums websites and online interviews. The quality of the information was good enough, the comments of gallerists and his own family took me to the point I was searching for. My approach with this material is to focus into his personality, how his time conditioned him deeply and why he wanted to transmit emotions through his work. 1 Main body Mark Rothko Biography 1903-1970 Mark Rothko was an American Abstract Expressionist painter, born at Dvinsk in Russia in 1903. He and his family immigrated to the United States when he was ten years old, and settled in Portland, Oregon, in 1913. Rothko attended a scholarship at Yale University in 1921, but he gave up his studies and in 1923 he moved to New York City. Rothko's nature was always more that of the self-taught man than the diligent pupil. This was the beginning of his life as an artist, his first encoun- ter with members of the American avant-garde. In his early years as an artist, in the 1930’s, Rothko painted pictures influenced by Matisse, mainlly urban scenes with simplified compositions and flat areas of color. In 1935 he got associated with The Ten, a group of Expressionist tendency, whose misión was to protest against the reputed Ame- rican painting and literal painting. During the early 1940’s decade he developed a Surrealist idiom, influenced by mythological symbols, he started making watercolours, horizontal zones of misty co- lour and working with biomorphic imagery related to Ernst and Miró. Two important events impacted in Rothko's life: the beginning of World War II and his reading of Friedrich Nietzsche. Both forced him to develop his own language aimed to express the tragedy of human condition. By 1947, Rothko turns into a complete abstraction, getting rid of surrealism or mythic imagery, his paintings are now fields of colour, large soft-edged areas of color with a symmetrical presentation. This year he creates the transitional "multiform" paintings characterized by the use of symmetrical rectangular blocks of two or three opposing or contrasting, colours. Himself described these pain- tings as possessing a more organic structure and units of human expression. The "multiforms" brought Rothko to a realization of his mature, signature style, the only style Rothko would never fully abandon. He refused conventional titles, just using numbers or colors in order to distinguish one work from another.(Fig.2) The artist also now resists explaining the meaning of his work. "Silence is so accura- te," he said, fearing that words would only paralyze the viewer's mind and imagination. Additionally, for the next years, Rothko painted in oil only, on large canvases with vertical formats in a very large scale with the purpose to make the viewer feel enveloped within the painting. In relation with this, Rothko stated: 2 “ I realize that historically the function of painting large pictures is painting some- thing very grandiose and pompous. The reason I paint them, however . is precisely because I want to be very intimate and human. To paint a small picture is to place yourself outside your experience, to look upon an experience as a stereopticon view or with a redu- 1 cing glass. However you paint the larger picture, you are in it. ” Fig.2 Despite his fame, Rothko felt a sense of being misunderstood as an artist. He feared that people purchased his paintings simply out of fashion and that the true purpose of his work was not being understand by collectors, critics, or audiences. He wanted his paintings to move beyond abstraction, as well as beyond classical art. For Rothko, the paintings were objects that possessed their own form and potential, and therefore, must be understood on this way. His interest was: “ only in expressing basic human emotions — tragedy, ecstasy, doom, and so on. And the fact that a lot of people break down and cry when confronted with my pictures shows that I can communicate those basic human emotions. The people who weep before my pictures are having the same religious experience I had when I painted them. And if 2 you, as you say, are moved only by their color relationship, then you miss the point. ” 1 Barbara Hess, Abstract Expressionism (New York: Taschen, 2005) 2 Qiu, Jane. Rothko’s methods revealed (London: Nature, 2008) 3 For Rothko, color is “merely an instrument.” The multiforms are, in essence, expression of basic human emotions. Rothko’s work began to get darken dramatically during the late 1950s. This development is related to his work on a mural commission for the Four Seasons restaurant, located in the Seagram Building in New York City. He refused to continue with the Project because he considered this space preten- tious and inappropriate for the display of his Works. Here Rothko turned to a palette of red, maroon, brown, and black. For many critics of his work this new colours was representative of a growing darkness within Rothko’s personal life. On the 1960’s his fame and wealth increased; his paintings began to be selled to notable collectors, including the Rockefellers. By this time the art world had turned its attention to a new artistic move- ment, Pop Art. In 1964, Rothko received his most important commission, from Dominique and John de Menil, to execute murals for a chapel in Houston.(Fig.3) The commission gave him the opportunity to fulfill one of his life’s ambitions, to create a monument that could stand in the great tradition of Western religious art. For the chapel, Rothko used only two colours, red and black as vehicles for an expres- sion of transcendental existence. The Houston paintings created a total environment, an atmos- phere of poetry and light. The Rothko’s Chapel represents his gradually growing concern for the transcendent. These works would be his final artistic statement to the world. In 1970 Rothko died in New York by his own hand. Fig.3 4 The New York School Mark Rothko was one of the preeminent artists of his generation, he belonged with Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman, Willem de Kooning, to the Abstract Expressionists, sometimes called New York School artists.(Fig.4) They were an association of avant-garde artists who lived in New York in the 1940s and 1950s. The group was also composed by other artists: poets, dancers, cho- reographers, prose writers, and jazz musicians. This was the begining of New York City’s influence as the center of the western art world, specifically in the Lower Manhattan. The first ideas of this artistic movement began to germinate with the political instability in Europe in the 1930s that brought several leading Surrealists to New York. Many of the Abstract Expressionists got profoundly influenced and interested in myths and archetypal symbols, creating a new style, a post-war mood of anxiety that combines self-expression and the chaos of the unconscious. Rothko and his peers moved away from European traditions of painting and created a new art mo- vement using abstraction to develop a strong emotional and expressive content. They were often characterized by gestural brush-strokes and the impression of spontaneity. In the Abstract Expressionism there were two main streams: the Gesture of Pollock and De Kooning, a radical new technique that consisted in dripping paint onto a canvas laid on the ground. The other tendency was the Colour Field Painting, represented by Mark Rothko, Newman, and Still who crea- ted art based on simplified and colour-dominated fields. Both streams were recognized for their large-scale paintings that got far away from traditional pro- cesses, they often took the canvas off of the easel and used unconventional materials such as house paint. Fig.4 5 Rothko and his time Rothko and his peers were announced as the first authentically American avant-garde style, they were american in spirit, monumental in scale, romantic in mood, and expressing for an indivi- dual freedom.
Recommended publications
  • Art in America
    MAGAZINE NOV. 01, 2013 THE PARSONS EFFECT by Judith E. Stein, Helène Aylon Betty Bierne Pierson, the rebellious, self­assured offspring of an old New York family, was 13 when she visited the historic Armory Show in 1913 and set her course on becoming an artist. Her conservative parents acquiesced to art lessons but drew the line at higher education for women. At 20, she married Schuyler Livingston Parsons, a man of wealth and social standing. He proved to be as captivated by men Betty Parsons, 1963. as she was by women, and a gambler and an alcoholic to boot. The Photo Alexander Liberman. The Getty couple divorced amicably in Paris, where she spent the 1920s in Research Institute, Los comfort, sharing her life with Adge Baker, a British art student, and Angeles. © J. Paul Getty Trust. taking classes with Ossip Zadkine and Antoine Bourdelle, among others. Her friends included expatriate Americans Hart Crane, Man Ray, Alexander Calder, and Gerald and Sara Murphy, as well as lesbian literati Gertrude Stein, Natalie Barney and Janet Flanner. Disinherited after her divorce, Parsons also lost her alimony support when the stock market crashed. Generous girlhood friends aided her return to the U.S. in 1933, first to Hollywood, where her acquaintances numbered Greta Garbo, Marlene Dietrich, Tallulah Bankhead, Dorothy Parker and Robert Benchley. She then lived in Santa Barbara, teaching art, painting portraits and consulting on French wines at a liquor store. In 1935, she funded a move to New York by selling her engagement ring. Parsons's loyal circle supplemented the slender income she earned from sales of her own art and from commissions by dealers such as Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Useum Of
    Hiss Sullivan THE ^ ETROPOLITAN NEWS AT WILL USEUM OF ART FOR Eakibitlon oyone to public M RELEASE Friday, March 24, 1950 FIFTHAYE.at82STREET • NEW YORK PRESS VIEW; Tuesday, March 21, 1950 from 2 to 4:30 p.m. PAINTINGS BY 52 YOUNG AMERICAN ARTISTS TO GO ON VIEW AT THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM; WORKS CHOSEN FROM 131 CANVASES SUBMITTED TO LIFE MAGAZINE BY ARTISTS UNDER 36 The Metropolitan Museum of Art has selected for exhibition 52 paintings by American artists under 36 from a group of 131 canvases assembled from throughout the nation by LIFE magazine. This special five-week exhibition of work considered their best by a group of the country's most promising young painters begins Friday, March 24th. Robert Beverly Hale, Associate Curator of Painting and Sculpture in the Mu­ seum's American Art Department, made the selection for the Metropolitan. He says he feels the display will help to indicate "where the future strength of painting lies in America." Several of the artists represented have already gained recognition. Among them are Walter Stuempfig, Hedda Sterne, William Kienbusch, Reuben Tarn, Mitchell Jamieson, Edward Melcarth and Theodoros Stamos. Others, including 25-year-old Hubert Raczka and 25-year-old Siegfried* Reinhardt, are just beginning to be known. When LIFE magazine recently asked the heads of schools, museums and leading college art departments to suggest the names of American painters under the ,age of 36 whose work they considered exceptionally promising, a total of 450 names were sent in. These artists were asked by LIFE to send in photographs of their best work On the evidence of more than 1,000 photographs, 131 artists were asked to send a painting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape in American Art
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications Sheldon Museum of Art 2003 Town and Country: The Landscape in American Art Sharon L. Gustafson Statewide Exhibition Coordinator, Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery, University of Nebraska- Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs Part of the Art and Design Commons Gustafson, Sharon L., "Town and Country: The Landscape in American Art" (2003). Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications. 77. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs/77 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sheldon Museum of Art at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TOWN & COUNTRY: The Landscape in American Art Sixteenth Annual Statewide Exhibition Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery and Sculpture Garden University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2002-2003 TOWN & COUNTRY: The Landscape in American Art he subject of Town and Country: Lands~ape as a backdrop but fills Tin American Art seems an appropnate the painting with the topic particularly in Nebraska where the land color and shapes of plays an integral part in defining our identity. spring. Mary's form The geography provides us physical suste­ mimics nature's shapes nance as well as aesthetic nourishment. There and the veil she wears is a closeness to the land that is perhaps even melds into the nearby more evident in the plains then anywhere else rock formations, so on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Discussion with Theodoros Stamos 45 Turkish Coffee in Greece by Elias Petropoulos 53 Documents: the O.S.S
    JO THE LLENIC 001ASP RA A Quarterly Review VOL. IX, No. 4 WINTER 1982 Publisher: LEANDROS PAPATHANASIOU Editorial Board: ALEXANDER KITROEFF PASCHALIS M. KITROMILIDES PETER PAPPAS YIANNIS P. ROUBATIS Founding Editor: NIKOS PETROPOULOS The Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora air mail; Institutional—$25.00 for one is a quarterly review published by Pella year, $45.00 for two years. Single issues Publishing Company, Inc., 337 West cost $4.50; back issues cost $6.00. 36th Street, New York, NY 10018, U.S.A., in March, June, September, and Advertising rates can be had on request December. Copyright © 1982 by Pella by writing to the Publisher. Publishing Company. Articles appearing in this journal are The editors welcome the freelance sub- abstrated and/or indexed in Historical mission of articles, essays and book re- Abstracts and America: History and views. All submitted material should be Life; or in Sociological Abstracts; or in typewritten and double-spaced. Trans- Psychological Abstracts; or in the Mod- lations should be accompanied by the ern Language Association Abstracts (in- original text. Book reviews should be cludes International Bibliography) or in approximately 600 to 1,200 words in International Political Science Abstracts length. Manuscripts will not be re- in accordance with the relevance of con- turned unless they are accompanied by tent to the abstracting agency. a stamped, self-addressed envelope. All articles and reviews published in Subscription rates: Individual—$15.00 the Journal represent only the opinions for one year, $27.00 for two years; of the individual authors; they do not Foreign—$20.00 for one year by surface necessarily reflect the views of the mail; Foreign-425,00 for one year by editors or the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Expressionism: a Concern with the Unknown Within.” in Robert Hobbs and Gail Levin
    “Early Abstract Expressionism: A Concern with the Unknown Within.” In Robert Hobbs and Gail Levin. Abstract Expressionism: The Formative Years. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art, 1978; pp. 8-26. Text © Robert Hobbs Early Abstract Expressionism: A Concern with the Unknown Within by Robert Carleton Hobbs Breakthrough! The term "breakthrough" is often used to assess a major accomplishment of an artist, the works in which he first achieves an undeniable advance. But what does a breakthrough really signify? What does an artist leave when he begins a new style? Is he really leaving, so to speak, one room, closing and sealing the door to it when he enters another? Or is he remodeling, expanding, or merely redecorating the room in which he exists? A major intent of this essay is to look closely at the rooms occupied by the Abstract Expressionists during their formative years, the enclosures pejoratively designated Surrealist-Cubist, in order to understand exactly what sort of quarters they inhabited before their acclaimed breakthrough. Moreover, the essay will examine these spaces, the ideas expressed in them and the artistic and literary sources supporting them. It will imply ways the later style is incorporated in the earlier one, for the development of the New York painters in the late 1940s was from the complex to the simple, from an admittedly conftated ambiguity typifying their work in the late thirties and greater part of the forties to the more condensed forms that remained the distinctive characteristic of their later style. The early paintings explain the later ones: they provide the key to interpreting the significant content that preoccupied the Abstract Expressionists.
    [Show full text]
  • A Finding Aid to the Theodoros Stamos Papers, Circa 1922-2008, in the Archives of American Art
    A Finding Aid to the Theodoros Stamos papers, circa 1922-2008, in the Archives of American Art Cynthia S. Brenwall October 3, 2012 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Biographical Material, circa 1922-2006..................................................... 5 Series 2: Financial Records, 1979-circa 1990's....................................................... 6 Series 3: Correspondence, circa 1940s-1997.......................................................... 7 Series 4: Business and Legal Records, 1974-2008................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Just What Was It That Made U.S. Art So Different, So Appealing?”
    “JUST WHAT WAS IT THAT MADE U.S. ART SO DIFFERENT, SO APPEALING?”: CASE STUDIES OF THE CRITICAL RECEPTION OF AMERICAN AVANT-GARDE PAINTING IN LONDON, 1950-1964 by FRANK G. SPICER III Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Ellen G. Landau Department of Art History and Art CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2009 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Frank G. Spicer III ______________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy candidate for the ________________________________degree *. Dr. Ellen G. Landau (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________Dr. Anne Helmreich Dr. Henry Adams ________________________________________________ Dr. Kurt Koenigsberger ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ December 18, 2008 (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents List of Figures 2 Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 12 Introduction 14 Chapter I. Historiography of Secondary Literature 23 II. The London Milieu 49 III. The Early Period: 1946/1950-55 73 IV. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 1, The Tate 94 V. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 2 127 VI. The Later Period: 1960-1962 171 VII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 1 213 VIII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 2 250 Concluding Remarks 286 Figures 299 Bibliography 384 1 List of Figures Fig. 1 Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? (1956) Fig. 2 Modern Art in the United States Catalogue Cover Fig. 3 The New American Painting Catalogue Cover Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Subjects, Greek-American Artists, and American Abstract Expressionism
    Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts - Volume 4, Issue 1 – Pages 25-34 Greek Subjects, Greek-American Artists, and American Abstract Expressionism By Gail Levin Many Abstract Expressionists in America found in Greek mythology rich material to express metaphoric meaning that could be communicated through the referential titles that they gave to their art, even when they stayed far away from literal representation. In the work of some Abstract Expressionists, these metaphors have been interpreted as referring to the tragic events of World War II. Yet for the Greek-American artists among and around the Abstract Expressionists, references to Greek myths came naturally through pride in their ancestral culture. Abstract Expressionists in the United States took a vigorous interest in classical Greek myths. They were following the lead of Surrealists in Europe, such as André Masson and Matta, as well as Picasso, who had absorbed Freud and turned to classical mythology. The Surrealists also admired Giorgio de Chiricoʼs painting with his classical references. His allusions to Greek mythology resulted from his birth in 1888 in Volos, Greece, to a Genovese mother and a Sicilian father. Giorgio grew up and studied in Athens before moving to Germany in 1906. From 1936, De Chiricoʼs work attracted attention in New York, where it was often shown, especially that year at the Pierre Matisse Gallery and in the Museum of Modern Artʼs show, Fantastic Art, Dada, and Surrealism. American artists not only admired De Chiricoʼs paintings, but felt Massonʼs influence firsthand since he took refuge in the United States during World War II. By then, Masson had already absorbed mythological themes drawn from ancient Greece and from Freudʼs writings on the dream and the unconscious.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whitney to Present Signs & Symbols, Third in Series Of
    THE WHITNEY TO PRESENT SIGNS & SYMBOLS, THIRD IN SERIES OF SIX SHOWS REASSESSING THE COLLECTION June 28-October 28, 2012 Theodoros Stamos (b. 1922), Ancestral Worship, 1947. © Estate of Theodoros Stamos NEW YORK, May 14, 2012 -- Signs & Symbols, the third in a series of six exhibitions focused on the Whitney’s collection, takes stock of the period from the mid-1940s to the end of the 1950s, drawing upon the Museum’s deep collection of paintings, sculpture, drawings, prints, and photographs. This exhibition reconsiders this critical postwar moment—a time perhaps most frequently associated with a select group of Abstract Expressionists and their large-scale, highly abstract canvases and gestural brushwork. By contrast and through a more textured narrative, Signs & Symbols highlights primarily abstract work completed on diverse scales, engaged with more figurative signs and symbols, and by a larger group of artists, many of whom are lesser known and rarely exhibited. The exhibition, curated by Donna De Salvo, the Whitney’s Chief Curator and Deputy Director for Programs, in collaboration with Jane Panetta, opens on June 28 and remains on view through October 28 in the Mildred & Herbert Lee Galleries on the Whitney’s second floor. Donna De Salvo comments: “The postwar period that Signs & Symbols makes its subject has become so identified with the heroic abstraction of New York School painting that it's easy to overlook the broader, more nuanced investigations into representation and abstraction that occupied artists throughout the country at the time. The Whitney's collection is wonderfully rich in these experiments as they play out nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Finding Aid to the Bernard J. Reis Papers, Circa 1913-1983, in the Archives of American Art
    A Finding Aid to the Bernard J. Reis Papers, circa 1913-1983, in the Archives of American Art Rebecca McCormick 2017 August 4 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Biographical and Family Papers, circa 1943-1975................................... 4 Series 2: Correspondence, circa 1935-1979............................................................ 5 Series 3: Professional Files, circa 1947-1975.......................................................... 7 Series 4: Art of This Century and Peggy Guggenheim Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950) [Book Review]
    The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950) [book review] By: Maggie Murphy Murphy, M. The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950), by Daniel Belasco, Bradford Collins, Beatriz Cordero, et al. [book review]. ARLIS/NA Reviews. May 2021. https://www.arlisna.org/publications/reviews/2270-the-irascibles-painters-against-the-museum- new-york-1950 ***Made available courtesy of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from ARLIS/NA.*** Abstract: “Dear Sir: The undersigned painters reject the monster national exhibition to be held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art next December, and will not submit work to its jury.” So begins the open letter signed by eighteen American abstract artists at the heart of The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950), an exhibition catalog published by Fundación Juan March. Keywords: book review | Metropolitan Museum of Art | abstract painting | New York School Article: ***Note: Full text of article below The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950) arlisna.org/publications/reviews/2270-the-irascibles-painters-against-the-museum-new-york-1950 by Daniel Belasco, Bradford Collins, Beatriz Cordero, et al. Fundación Juan March, July 2020. 304 p. ill. ISBN 9788470756658 (h/c), $55.00. Reviewed May 2021 Maggie Murphy, Visual Art & Humanities Librarian, UNC Greensboro, [email protected] “Dear Sir: The undersigned painters reject the monster national exhibition to be held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art next December, and will not submit work to its jury.” So begins the open letter signed by eighteen American abstract artists at the heart of The Irascibles: Painters Against the Museum (New York, 1950), an exhibition catalog published by Fundación Juan March.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Expressionism 1 Abstract Expressionism
    Abstract expressionism 1 Abstract expressionism Abstract expressionism was an American post–World War II art movement. It was the first specifically American movement to achieve worldwide influence and put New York City at the center of the western art world, a role formerly filled by Paris. Although the term "abstract expressionism" was first applied to American art in 1946 by the art critic Robert Coates, it had been first used in Germany in 1919 in the magazine Der Sturm, regarding German Expressionism. In the USA, Alfred Barr was the first to use this term in 1929 in relation to works by Wassily Kandinsky.[1] The movement's name is derived from the combination of the emotional intensity and self-denial of the German Expressionists with the anti-figurative aesthetic of the European abstract schools such as Futurism, the Bauhaus and Synthetic Cubism. Additionally, it has an image of being rebellious, anarchic, highly idiosyncratic and, some feel, nihilistic.[2] Jackson Pollock, No. 5, 1948, oil on fiberboard, 244 x 122 cm. (96 x 48 in.), private collection. Style Technically, an important predecessor is surrealism, with its emphasis on spontaneous, automatic or subconscious creation. Jackson Pollock's dripping paint onto a canvas laid on the floor is a technique that has its roots in the work of André Masson, Max Ernst and David Alfaro Siqueiros. Another important early manifestation of what came to be abstract expressionism is the work of American Northwest artist Mark Tobey, especially his "white writing" canvases, which, though generally not large in scale, anticipate the "all-over" look of Pollock's drip paintings.
    [Show full text]