DOCSLIB.ORG

Theodoros Stamos, Paint Was Alive, Possessed of a Power That Could Connect the Artist Directly to Nature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Theodoros Stamos, Paint Was Alive, Possessed of a Power That Could Connect the Artist Directly to Nature As seen in For the American Abstract Expressionist Theodoros Stamos, paint was alive, possessed of a power that could connect the artist directly to nature. By CarterBy Ratcliff The son of Greek immigrant parents, Theodoros In 1935, Mark Rothko and Adolph Gottlieb joined with eight Stamos was born in 1922 on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. other modernist painters in New York to form the Ten. One of the When he was eight years old he suffered an accident and during a group’s members, Joseph Solomon, taught at the American Artists three-month convalescence began to draw and make sculpture— School. Intuiting Stamos’ true vocation, Solomon encouraged him a pastime driven by a talent that earned him a scholarship to the to paint rather than sculpt. Taking his teacher’s advice, the young American Artists School, in Greenwich Village, when he was just student abandoned sculpture and took up painting with such fervor 14 years old. A part-time student, he concentrated on sculpture that he dropped out of high school, even though he was just three rather than painting. At no point in his career did Stamos receive months from graduation. Supporting himself with odd jobs, Sta- any formal training as a painter, which is remarkable considering mos painted, visited the handful of New York galleries that exhib- his prominent place among the artists who came to be known as ited contemporary art, and, in 1941, found a permanent position Abstract Expressionists. as the manager of a frame shop on West 18th Street. There he met GALLERIES TAGGART HOLLIS STAMOS/COURTESY THEODOROS OF ESTATE © GALLERIES; ACA STAMOS/COURTESY THEODOROS OF Opposite: Theodoros Stamos, Ascent for Ritual, 1947, oil on Masonite, 39 x 23.75 in. ESTATE © living color living This page: Greek Rug Mountain Laurel, 1953, oil on canvas, 37 x 48 in. NOVEMBER 2017 ART&ANTIQUES 67 living color As seen in GALLERIES TAGGART HOLLIS STAMOS/COURTESY THEODOROS OF ESTATE © GALLERIES; ACA STAMOS/COURTESY in an exhibition devoted to Parisian Surrealism. Clockwise from top left: Untitled, 1952, gouache on cardboard, The rock in this painting is as mushroom- or bird-like as it 10.25 x 7.25 in.; Levant #12, 1960-84, oil on canvas, 54.25 x 42 in.; Infinity is rock-like, a seemingly animate thing, which suggests that the Field, Jerusalem Series VI, 1984–85, acrylic on canvas, 60 x 60 in. From top: Migration, 1948, oil on Masonite, 36 x 48 in.; Classic Boundaries #3, 1964, oil on canvas, 36 x 48 in. sounds it contains—or makes—are at least potentially intelli- THEODOROS gible. Stamos invites us to see the forms in his paintings as fel- © OF Fernand Léger, among other members of the Parisian avant-garde had emerged in Paris nearly two decades earlier. ESTATE low beings, presences with which it is possible to empathize. In exiled to New York by the German invasion of Paris. Originating in the Surrealist method of automatic drawing, notes for a 1953 lecture, Stamos addressed a large question— ESTATE Betty Parsons, the director of the Wakefield Gallery and Book- biomorphism not only pictures living, germinating form. It pos- OF “what, how, and why nature in art?” And that, he adds, is “just © store, gave Stamos his first solo exhibition, in 1943; and when its painting as a kind of germination, a process that draws on THEODOROS the beginning of my queries.” “What,” he asked further, “is Parson opened her own gallery a few seasons later, he contin- unconscious energies to give birth to new and, of course, organic the secret of silence?” With this unanswerable question Stamos ued to show with her—an asso- shapes—hence the sprouting, seems to be saying that, in its muteness, a painting preserves GALLERIES; ciation that gave him an intro- twining, flowering presences mysteries. But its meanings are never completely ungraspable, STAMOS/COURTESY duction to Barnett Newman and one sees in the work of the bio- ACA as he suggests by asking, “What is the spirit which guides and Gottlieb. Hardly out of his teens, morphic Surrealists. Except for expresses the physical world?” For this question leads us back Stamos was finding his way into Arshile Gorky, no American to his biomorphic paintings and invites us to feel at one with the New York avant-garde—and practitioners of this style were the inner lives of their unknown but peculiarly familiar shapes. feeling himself swept along on recognized by André Breton, As we respond to the distinct qualities of these highly the same aesthetic currents that Surrealism’s “pope” in exile. HOLLIS evolved, fully individuated forms, they come awake to us, ani- STAMOS/COURTESY were bearing Gottlieb, New- And it is arguable that the Amer- mated by a spirit we could attribute to our imaginations, to that man, Jackson Pollock, William icans owed as much to such New TAGGART of the artist, or to the organic energies of the natural world. At Baziotes, and others to their first World predecessors as Arthur this stage in his career, Stamos was an heir to Romantics’ faith mature work. These painters Dove and Georgia O’Keeffe as that art immerses us not merely in nature but in the creative THEODOROS GALLERIES were becoming, in a word, Sur- they owed to their European OF flow of Nature with a capital “N.” As the 1940s continued, his realists. More specifically, each contemporaries. Nonetheless, imagery merged the contours of leaves and branches with those was finding his own version of Stamos’ Sounds in the Rock of birds in flight. Reaching across the surface of a painting, spi- ESTATE the biomorphic Surrealism that (1946) would have been at home © dery lines acquire amphibian traits. Clouds solidify into geo- 68 ART&ANTIQUES NOVEMBER 2017 NOVEMBER 2017 ART&ANTIQUES 69 living color As seen in living color graphical features and warm-blooded protesting the Metropolitan Museum’s anatomies are born of the stony shapes exclusion of their work from a recent that proliferate in his paintings from survey exhibition, they were soon gath- this period. ered under single label—“Abstract In an essay published in the cata- Expressionism”—despite their differ- logue of Stamos’s 1946 exhibition at ences. Newman was a geometer, Pol- the Betty Parsons Gallery, Barnett lock a paint-slinger, and de Kooning a Newman wrote that the younger art- painterly painter with roots not only ist’s “ideographs capture the moment in the Parisian avant-garde but in the of totemic affinity with the rock and Baroque of Peter Paul Rubens. More- the mushroom, the crayfish and the over, they all were evolving rapidly. seaweed,” adding that “one might say Early in the 1950s, Stamos ushered that instead of going into the rock, he subtly geometric forms into his paint- comes out of it”—an image of the art- ings—echoes, perhaps, of the monu- ist not as an inhabitant of the natural ments, cathedrals, and other sights world but, rather, as its progeny. Not- seen on his recent travels in Europe and ing his colleague’s powers of “commu- United States. Yet his hints of archi- nion” with non-human things, New- traves and lintels still have an organic man suggests that Stamos himself is a natural phenomenon, which feel, for he did not abandon the biomorphism of his early work so is even more remarkable considering his childhood in the streets much as enlarge his vision of Nature to include civilization. And of Manhattan. we see the artist’s vision of civilization expanding as he inflects In 1948, Life magazine ran an extensive article on avant-garde the surface of the canvas with the calligraphic marks of his Tea art, illustrating it with reproductions of paintings by Stamos, Wil- House series, a reflection of his long-standing interest in Asian art. lem de Kooning, Gottlieb, Pollock, and Baziotes. Three years later, For years, Stamos had studied Chinese and Japanese paintings Life published a group portrait of these artists and 10 others, New- in the collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Now he was man and Clyfford Still among them. Dubbed “The Irascibles” after finding his way to synthesis of Eastern and Western traditions, a © ESTATE OF THEODOROS STAMOS/COURTESY HOLLIS TAGGART GALLERIES This page, from top: Mykonos, 1962, oil on canvas, 56 x 52 in.; Old Sparta, 1951–52, oil on linen, 31 x 54 in. Opposite: Delphic Shibboleth, 1959, oil on canvas, 60 x 50 in. 70 ART&ANTIQUES NOVEMBER 2017 NOVEMBER 2017 ART&ANTIQUES 71 living color As seen in © ESTATE HOLLIS OF TAGGART THEODOROS development with parallels in the austerely gestural paintings of fellow Abstract Expressionists Franz Kline and Robert Mother- GALLERIES; the paint—the paint on canvas—with which I am involved, allow- Clockwise from top left: Untitled (Columns of Fire), 1956, oil on canvas, well. As they narrowed their palettes to black and white, Stamos STAMOS/COURTESY ing the paint to have a chance and achieving a harmony between 48 x 32 in.; Infinity Field Torino Series, 1989, acrylic on canvas, 66 x 50 in.; had turned by the end of the 1950s to high-keyed yellows and reds. the two.” This harmony of vision and image, of seeing and the thing Clockwise from top left: Infinity Field, Jerusalem Series I, 1987, acrylic on Three Kings, 1949, oil on Masonite, 29.75 x 38 in. As even his blues and grays grew luminous, his aesthetic evolution © seen, could be construed as a formalist goal of the kind that implies paper, 30.5 x 22.5 in.; Homage to Milton Avery: Sun-Box III, 1969, acrylic had taken him once again to new territory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art in America
    MAGAZINE NOV. 01, 2013 THE PARSONS EFFECT by Judith E. Stein, Helène Aylon Betty Bierne Pierson, the rebellious, self­assured offspring of an old New York family, was 13 when she visited the historic Armory Show in 1913 and set her course on becoming an artist. Her conservative parents acquiesced to art lessons but drew the line at higher education for women. At 20, she married Schuyler Livingston Parsons, a man of wealth and social standing. He proved to be as captivated by men Betty Parsons, 1963. as she was by women, and a gambler and an alcoholic to boot. The Photo Alexander Liberman. The Getty couple divorced amicably in Paris, where she spent the 1920s in Research Institute, Los comfort, sharing her life with Adge Baker, a British art student, and Angeles. © J. Paul Getty Trust. taking classes with Ossip Zadkine and Antoine Bourdelle, among others. Her friends included expatriate Americans Hart Crane, Man Ray, Alexander Calder, and Gerald and Sara Murphy, as well as lesbian literati Gertrude Stein, Natalie Barney and Janet Flanner. Disinherited after her divorce, Parsons also lost her alimony support when the stock market crashed. Generous girlhood friends aided her return to the U.S. in 1933, first to Hollywood, where her acquaintances numbered Greta Garbo, Marlene Dietrich, Tallulah Bankhead, Dorothy Parker and Robert Benchley. She then lived in Santa Barbara, teaching art, painting portraits and consulting on French wines at a liquor store. In 1935, she funded a move to New York by selling her engagement ring. Parsons's loyal circle supplemented the slender income she earned from sales of her own art and from commissions by dealers such as Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Useum Of
    Hiss Sullivan THE ^ ETROPOLITAN NEWS AT WILL USEUM OF ART FOR Eakibitlon oyone to public M RELEASE Friday, March 24, 1950 FIFTHAYE.at82STREET • NEW YORK PRESS VIEW; Tuesday, March 21, 1950 from 2 to 4:30 p.m. PAINTINGS BY 52 YOUNG AMERICAN ARTISTS TO GO ON VIEW AT THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM; WORKS CHOSEN FROM 131 CANVASES SUBMITTED TO LIFE MAGAZINE BY ARTISTS UNDER 36 The Metropolitan Museum of Art has selected for exhibition 52 paintings by American artists under 36 from a group of 131 canvases assembled from throughout the nation by LIFE magazine. This special five-week exhibition of work considered their best by a group of the country's most promising young painters begins Friday, March 24th. Robert Beverly Hale, Associate Curator of Painting and Sculpture in the Mu­ seum's American Art Department, made the selection for the Metropolitan. He says he feels the display will help to indicate "where the future strength of painting lies in America." Several of the artists represented have already gained recognition. Among them are Walter Stuempfig, Hedda Sterne, William Kienbusch, Reuben Tarn, Mitchell Jamieson, Edward Melcarth and Theodoros Stamos. Others, including 25-year-old Hubert Raczka and 25-year-old Siegfried* Reinhardt, are just beginning to be known. When LIFE magazine recently asked the heads of schools, museums and leading college art departments to suggest the names of American painters under the ,age of 36 whose work they considered exceptionally promising, a total of 450 names were sent in. These artists were asked by LIFE to send in photographs of their best work On the evidence of more than 1,000 photographs, 131 artists were asked to send a painting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape in American Art
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications Sheldon Museum of Art 2003 Town and Country: The Landscape in American Art Sharon L. Gustafson Statewide Exhibition Coordinator, Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery, University of Nebraska- Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs Part of the Art and Design Commons Gustafson, Sharon L., "Town and Country: The Landscape in American Art" (2003). Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications. 77. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs/77 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sheldon Museum of Art at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TOWN & COUNTRY: The Landscape in American Art Sixteenth Annual Statewide Exhibition Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery and Sculpture Garden University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2002-2003 TOWN & COUNTRY: The Landscape in American Art he subject of Town and Country: Lands~ape as a backdrop but fills Tin American Art seems an appropnate the painting with the topic particularly in Nebraska where the land color and shapes of plays an integral part in defining our identity. spring. Mary's form The geography provides us physical suste­ mimics nature's shapes nance as well as aesthetic nourishment. There and the veil she wears is a closeness to the land that is perhaps even melds into the nearby more evident in the plains then anywhere else rock formations, so on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Arts and Architecture CUT AND PASTE ABSTRACTION: POLITICS, FORM, AND IDENTITY IN ABSTRACT EXPRESSIONIST COLLAGE A Dissertation in Art History by Daniel Louis Haxall © 2009 Daniel Louis Haxall Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2009 The dissertation of Daniel Haxall has been reviewed and approved* by the following: Sarah K. Rich Associate Professor of Art History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Leo G. Mazow Curator of American Art, Palmer Museum of Art Affiliate Associate Professor of Art History Joyce Henri Robinson Curator, Palmer Museum of Art Affiliate Associate Professor of Art History Adam Rome Associate Professor of History Craig Zabel Associate Professor of Art History Head of the Department of Art History * Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT In 1943, Peggy Guggenheim‘s Art of This Century gallery staged the first large-scale exhibition of collage in the United States. This show was notable for acquainting the New York School with the medium as its artists would go on to embrace collage, creating objects that ranged from small compositions of handmade paper to mural-sized works of torn and reassembled canvas. Despite the significance of this development, art historians consistently overlook collage during the era of Abstract Expressionism. This project examines four artists who based significant portions of their oeuvre on papier collé during this period (i.e. the late 1940s and early 1950s): Lee Krasner, Robert Motherwell, Anne Ryan, and Esteban Vicente. Working primarily with fine art materials in an abstract manner, these artists challenged many of the characteristics that supposedly typified collage: its appropriative tactics, disjointed aesthetics, and abandonment of ―high‖ culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Work
    Surface Work Private View 6 – 8pm, Wednesday 11 April 2018 11 April – 19 May 2018 Victoria Miro, Wharf Road, London N1 7RW 11 April – 16 June 2018 Victoria Miro Mayfair, 14 St George Street, London W1S 1FE Image: Adriana Varejão, Azulejão (Moon), 2018 Oil and plaster on canvas, 180 x 180cm. Photograph: Jaime Acioli © the artist, courtesy Victoria Miro, London / Venice Taking place across Victoria Miro’s London galleries, this international, cross-generational exhibition is a celebration of women artists who have shaped and transformed, and continue to influence and expand, the language and definition of abstract painting. More than 50 artists from North and South America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia are represented. The earliest work, an ink on paper work by the Russian Constructivist Liubov Popova, was completed in 1918. The most recent, by contemporary artists including Adriana Varejão, Svenja Deininger and Elizabeth Neel, have been made especially for the exhibition. A number of the artists in the exhibition were born in the final decades of the nineteenth century, while the youngest, Beirut-based Dala Nasser, was born in 1990. Work from every decade between 1918 and 2018 is featured. Surface Work takes its title from a quote by the Abstract Expressionist painter Joan Mitchell, who said: ‘Abstract is not a style. I simply want to make a surface work.’ The exhibition reflects the ways in which women have been at the heart of abstract art’s development over the past century, from those who propelled the language of abstraction forward, often with little recognition, to those who have built upon the legacy of earlier generations, using abstraction to open new paths to optical, emotional, cultural, and even political expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Pousette-Dart, the Forgotten Man of Abstract Expressionism
    ALL SECTIONS (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/) Culture Art More › Culture › Art › Artists Art's quiet American: Richard Pousette-Dart, the forgotten man of abstract expressionism Richard Richard Pousette-Dart's Within the Room (1942) CREDIT: ROBERT GERHARDT AND DENIS Y. SU By Alastair Sooke, CRITIC AT LARGE Follow 11 NOVEMBER 2018 • 8:00AM Home My Feed Saved n 1951, Life magazine published a photograph of 14 men – and one woman – in a studio, Istaring solemnly at the camera. They were, as the headline put it, the “Irascibles”: the principal players in abstract expressionism, united in their anger about a recent survey of contemporary painting at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, which they felt was too reactionary. There they all are, the big beasts of 20th-century American art: Mark Rothko, smoking on a stool in the front row; slick-haired Willem de Kooning, glaring from the back; and at the centre, the eye of this artistic storm, Jackson Pollock, hunched in a chalk-stripe suit. But who is the figure standing at the far left? Wearing a dark shirt and tie and a baggy, double-breasted jacket, he looks like a movie mobster. In fact, he was a brilliant painter and now the subject of an exhibition at Kettle’s Yard in Cambridge, the first devoted to him in this country. His name was Richard Pousette-Dart (1916-92), and he is the forgotten man of abstract expressionism. “He was a deeply private, shy, and extremely peaceful person,” says his 71-year-old daughter, Joanna, speaking by phone from New York.
    [Show full text]
  • A Discussion with Theodoros Stamos 45 Turkish Coffee in Greece by Elias Petropoulos 53 Documents: the O.S.S
    JO THE LLENIC 001ASP RA A Quarterly Review VOL. IX, No. 4 WINTER 1982 Publisher: LEANDROS PAPATHANASIOU Editorial Board: ALEXANDER KITROEFF PASCHALIS M. KITROMILIDES PETER PAPPAS YIANNIS P. ROUBATIS Founding Editor: NIKOS PETROPOULOS The Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora air mail; Institutional—$25.00 for one is a quarterly review published by Pella year, $45.00 for two years. Single issues Publishing Company, Inc., 337 West cost $4.50; back issues cost $6.00. 36th Street, New York, NY 10018, U.S.A., in March, June, September, and Advertising rates can be had on request December. Copyright © 1982 by Pella by writing to the Publisher. Publishing Company. Articles appearing in this journal are The editors welcome the freelance sub- abstrated and/or indexed in Historical mission of articles, essays and book re- Abstracts and America: History and views. All submitted material should be Life; or in Sociological Abstracts; or in typewritten and double-spaced. Trans- Psychological Abstracts; or in the Mod- lations should be accompanied by the ern Language Association Abstracts (in- original text. Book reviews should be cludes International Bibliography) or in approximately 600 to 1,200 words in International Political Science Abstracts length. Manuscripts will not be re- in accordance with the relevance of con- turned unless they are accompanied by tent to the abstracting agency. a stamped, self-addressed envelope. All articles and reviews published in Subscription rates: Individual—$15.00 the Journal represent only the opinions for one year, $27.00 for two years; of the individual authors; they do not Foreign—$20.00 for one year by surface necessarily reflect the views of the mail; Foreign-425,00 for one year by editors or the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Expressionism: a Concern with the Unknown Within.” in Robert Hobbs and Gail Levin
    “Early Abstract Expressionism: A Concern with the Unknown Within.” In Robert Hobbs and Gail Levin. Abstract Expressionism: The Formative Years. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art, 1978; pp. 8-26. Text © Robert Hobbs Early Abstract Expressionism: A Concern with the Unknown Within by Robert Carleton Hobbs Breakthrough! The term "breakthrough" is often used to assess a major accomplishment of an artist, the works in which he first achieves an undeniable advance. But what does a breakthrough really signify? What does an artist leave when he begins a new style? Is he really leaving, so to speak, one room, closing and sealing the door to it when he enters another? Or is he remodeling, expanding, or merely redecorating the room in which he exists? A major intent of this essay is to look closely at the rooms occupied by the Abstract Expressionists during their formative years, the enclosures pejoratively designated Surrealist-Cubist, in order to understand exactly what sort of quarters they inhabited before their acclaimed breakthrough. Moreover, the essay will examine these spaces, the ideas expressed in them and the artistic and literary sources supporting them. It will imply ways the later style is incorporated in the earlier one, for the development of the New York painters in the late 1940s was from the complex to the simple, from an admittedly conftated ambiguity typifying their work in the late thirties and greater part of the forties to the more condensed forms that remained the distinctive characteristic of their later style. The early paintings explain the later ones: they provide the key to interpreting the significant content that preoccupied the Abstract Expressionists.
    [Show full text]
  • A Finding Aid to the Theodoros Stamos Papers, Circa 1922-2008, in the Archives of American Art
    A Finding Aid to the Theodoros Stamos papers, circa 1922-2008, in the Archives of American Art Cynthia S. Brenwall October 3, 2012 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Biographical Material, circa 1922-2006..................................................... 5 Series 2: Financial Records, 1979-circa 1990's....................................................... 6 Series 3: Correspondence, circa 1940s-1997.......................................................... 7 Series 4: Business and Legal Records, 1974-2008................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HEDDA STERNE by Joan Simon | February 2007
    HEDDA STERNE by Joan Simon | February 2007 HEDDA STERNE, UNTITLED, 1983. OIL AND PASTEL ON CANVAS Like many others, I have been curious about Hedda Sterne, the lone woman in the hat standing in the last row of the formally staged photograph of 15 New York School artists who became known as "The Irascibles" when this image was published in Life magazine on Jan. 15, 1951. Now, a traveling exhibition, "Uninterrupted Flux: Hedda Sterne," organized for the Krannert Art Museum by Sarah L. Eckhardt, together with its accompanying catalogue, offers a detailed look at the artist's long and varied career. Initially identified with the Surrealists, then the Abstract Expressionists, Sterne followed her own imperatives, changing subjects and techniques and moving wherever her ideas and observations led her. In the decade between arriving in the U.S. in 1941 until the photograph was taken, as Eckhardt writes: Sterne actively engaged in the artistic dialogue in New York. Sterne's work had been featured in four solo exhibitions (each organized by Betty Parsons) and numerous important group shows, including five at Peggy Guggenheim's Art of This Century, one at Sidney Janis Gallery, two Whitney Annuals, and three Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art Annuals. In the subsequent decade, Sterne had nine more solo shows and participated in more than forty group exhibitions At the Betty Parsons Gallery and elsewhere, Sterne's art hung alongside that of Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, Barnett Newman, Mark Rothko, and Theodore Stamos. Sterne's abstractions were noted as examples of "advanced" or "radical" art by Clement Greenberg in a 1947 article in the Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • “Just What Was It That Made U.S. Art So Different, So Appealing?”
    “JUST WHAT WAS IT THAT MADE U.S. ART SO DIFFERENT, SO APPEALING?”: CASE STUDIES OF THE CRITICAL RECEPTION OF AMERICAN AVANT-GARDE PAINTING IN LONDON, 1950-1964 by FRANK G. SPICER III Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Ellen G. Landau Department of Art History and Art CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2009 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Frank G. Spicer III ______________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy candidate for the ________________________________degree *. Dr. Ellen G. Landau (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________Dr. Anne Helmreich Dr. Henry Adams ________________________________________________ Dr. Kurt Koenigsberger ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ December 18, 2008 (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents List of Figures 2 Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 12 Introduction 14 Chapter I. Historiography of Secondary Literature 23 II. The London Milieu 49 III. The Early Period: 1946/1950-55 73 IV. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 1, The Tate 94 V. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 2 127 VI. The Later Period: 1960-1962 171 VII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 1 213 VIII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 2 250 Concluding Remarks 286 Figures 299 Bibliography 384 1 List of Figures Fig. 1 Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? (1956) Fig. 2 Modern Art in the United States Catalogue Cover Fig. 3 The New American Painting Catalogue Cover Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Finding Aid to the Hedda Sterne Papers in the Archives of American Art
    A Finding Aid to the Hedda Sterne Papers in the Archives of American Art Judy Ng Processing of this collection was funded by the Terra Foundation for American Art. Digitization of this collection was funded by the Hedda Sterne Foundation. 2013 October 10 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Biographical Materials, 1941-1970........................................................... 4 Series 2: Correspondence, circa 1943-1965............................................................ 5 Series 3: Writings, circa 1945-1965........................................................................
    [Show full text]