Incentive Salience and the Transition to Addiction Mike J.F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Incentive Salience and the Transition to Addiction Mike J.F Author's personal copy CHAPTER 39 Incentive Salience and the Transition to Addiction Mike J.F. Robinson, Terry E. Robinson and Kent C. Berridge University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA OUTLINE Drug Addiction, Recovery, and Relapse 391 Sensitization of Incentive Salience 395 The Incentive Sensitization Theory 393 Factors That Influence Sensitization 396 What Psychologically Is Sensitized? Incentive Salience Cross-sensitization 396 Features 394 Context and Craving 396 What Is Incentive Salience? 395 A Role for Pleasure? 397 Mesolimbic Dopamine as a Common Currency for Summary 398 Incentive Salience 395 DRUG ADDICTION, RECOVERY, disorder, and an even smaller proportion suffer from AND RELAPSE chronic drug addiction. Yet, the worldwide monetary and social costs associated with drug control measures, Most adults have used a potentially addictive drug at corruption, lost productivity, and treatment of drug least once in their lifetime, if caffeine, alcohol, and nico- addiction are enormous. tine are included in addition to illicit drugs. In some The chief problem in treating drug addiction is cases, contact with a substance is so frequent and chronic or repeated relapse by those who have become socially accepted that many in society fail to recognize addicted in the above sense. Even after prolonged it as a “drug.” However, relatively few people develop periods of withdrawal and abstinence, a high percentage sufficient problems with drug use to meet the formal of addicted individuals in treatment programs eventu- criteria for addiction, even for potent illegal drugs ally relapse to drug taking. For example, in the case of such as cocaine or heroin. Drug addiction is character- a study of heroin users, relapse rates to reuse after cessa- ized by compulsive drug seeking, an impairment of tion were approximately 60% within 3 months and at social and psychological functions and/or damage to least 75% within 12 months. For this reason, drug addic- one’s health. It typically involves overwhelming tion is characterized as a chronic relapsing disorder; involvement with drug procurement and intake, a loss relapse is the rule rather than the exception and often of control, and a narrowing of interests away from other occurs repeatedly. forms of reward besides the drug of choice. According to There are three reasons frequently suggested to a 2004 survey, less than 10% of the US population meet explain relapse: (1) drug euphoria – that addicts resume the criteria for alcohol abuse or any illegal drug abuse drug taking to experience the intense pleasure Biological Research on Addiction, Volume 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398335-0.00039-X 391 Copyright Ó 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Biological Research on Addiction, First Edition, 2013, 391–399 Author's personal copy 392 39. INCENTIVE SALIENCE AND THE TRANSITION TO ADDICTION (euphoria) they remember the drug producing; (2) over- also often occurs much later and even in fully “detoxi- learning habits or predictions – drug taking becomes such fied” addicts who are no longer experiencing any strong a well-entrenched habit that relapse is almost inevitable negative symptoms of withdrawal. Even if one adds or that learning becomes distorted in other ways to conditioned withdrawal that sometimes occurs later – create false predictions about drug rewards; and finally symptoms resurrected by drug cues – to the category of (3) withdrawal escape – that the withdrawal syndrome withdrawal, long-term feelings of withdrawal remain that accompanies the cessation of drug intake is so relatively infrequent and weak as a cause of relapse. unpleasant that an addict would do anything to stop it For example, McAuliffe reported that only 11 of 40 and so relapse occurs as an escape from withdrawal. (27.5%) heroin addicts reported experiencing condi- All these explanations certainly play a role in relapse, tioned withdrawal feelings at all, and only 2 (5%) said yet several considerations suggest that they leave out that it led them to ever resume drug use. Other reasons many situations where relapse occurs. for relapse must be more potent to explain why a detoxi- First, drug pleasure or euphoria certainly accounts for fied addict decides to take drugs again. In addition, the initial pattern of drug use and abuse, but may have addicts will often voluntarily undergo the unpleasant more difficulty in accounting for relapse. Some individ- process of withdrawal in detoxification clinics, some- uals actually have been described to experience times again and again, to reduce tolerance and the mone- a decrease in drug pleasure after prolonged use, due tary cost of their addiction and to possibly regain some of to development of tolerance, yet experience a simulta- the euphoria that comes with taking the drug. In short, neous increase in drug craving. Thus, relapse may occur withdrawal is not always highly avoided or so bad as at a moment of reduced drug pleasure but elevated drug to be the chief cause of addictive drug taking, and the craving. Also, relapse happens even in situations when end of withdrawal does not signal the end of addiction. addicts know that their drug will fail to lead to intense In contrast to these suggestions, the incentive sensiti- pleasure but rather to more misery. zation theory proposes an alternative view – that It has also been suggested that the repeated use of relapse frequently occurs as a result of drug-induced drugs creates a learning disorder or makes drug taking brain changes that lead to intense incentive motivation an overly ritualized habitual act. This may be true of for drugs, or pulses of “wanting” often triggered by the act of drug taking, but perhaps less so regarding drug cues, which may control behavior implicitly or the preceding flexible acts of drug seeking or drug sometimes may be experienced as feelings of drug craving. Learned habits or mispredictions alone cannot craving. Craving is defined as pathologically intense account for the excessive motivational attraction that feelings of wanting, which can be produced when drugs and their cues develop through the course of incentive salience (or core “wanting”) is translated addiction. The idea that addiction is merely a rigid into conscious awareness. At its core, the motivation stimulus–response habit does not account for how to take drugs is due to the overattribution of incentive motivation imbues the act of drug taking with compul- salience to drug-related stimuli. It is important to note sive overtones that cannot readily be overridden by that incentive salience is a distinct psychological the resolution to abstain. Other extremely well-learned process from withdrawal and drug pleasure. habits such as tying one’s shoes and brushing one’s teeth In particular, the incentive sensitization theory are not compulsive in a motivational sense – those habits proposed by Robinson and Berridge (1993) suggests can easily be left undone or stopped midway if one that craving and relapse are governed by a sensitized wishes, without experiencing a compulsive urge to neural system (mesocorticolimbic dopamine and related continue. The learning account as a rigid habit also fails systems) that normally functions to attribute incentive to explain the flexibility and resourcefulness that addicts salience to reward cues. This system transforms ordi- display when procuring drugs. nary stimuli, such as cues associated with rewards, Finally, many addictive drugs surely do induce into incentive stimuli, making them attractive and able homeostatic responses that oppose the primary drug to trigger an urge to pursue and consume their reward. effects and produce the phenomena of tolerance (when Repeated drug use produces sensitization of this brain drug is present) and withdrawal (when drug is absent). system, which leads to increased “wanting,” which in Withdrawal, in particular, is typically described as an turn leads to excessive control of behavior by drug- intense negative emotional state accompanied by related incentive stimuli. Addiction can therefore be dysphoria, anxiety, and irritability. Withdrawal may described as an excessive “wanting” problem. Impor- indeed be a potent reason why many addicts relapse tantly, excessive “wanting” can occur even in the and take drugs, at least while the withdrawal lasts. Yet, absence of excessive liking for drugs. In fact, the withdrawal is a relatively short-lived phenomenon and increasing dissociation that addicts exhibit between decays substantially within days to weeks. By contrast, how much they “want” drugs and the pleasure drugs while relapse frequently occurs during withdrawal, it produce explains many of the irrational features of II. NEUROSCIENCE Biological Research on Addiction, First Edition, 2013, 391–399 Author's personal copy THE INCENTIVE SENSITIZATION THEORY 393 behavior behind their drug-taking and drug-seeking frenzied bursts of effort to obtain the reward in habits. Irrational “wanting” for addictive drugs can Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) experiments. lead to persistent taking of drugs again and again Yet, sensitization does not increase “liking” reactions despite the adverse consequences and even if the that reflect the hedonic impact of the reward when it euphoria of drug consumption declines. actually arrives. Similarly, in humans who are becoming The basic mechanisms of the excessive attribution of drug tolerant, incentive motivation to take the drug can incentive salience to drugs and drug-related stimuli can grow as they become addicted, so that a single dose of even occur as a mostly unconscious process, creating urges drug can provoke intense urges to take more, even if to take drugs whether or not a strong subjective feeling of the person reports that the dose of drug no longer gives craving is simultaneously present. Such dissociation as much pleasure as it did initially. between acted-on motivation and confusing subjective It may be important to note that some neuroscientists feelings is what often renders the compulsive quality of initially questioned, after the incentive sensitization an addict’s own behavior astonishing even to him or her.
Recommended publications
  • Amphetamine Sensitization Alters Hippocampal Neuronal Morphology and Memory and Learning Behaviors
    Molecular Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0809-2 ARTICLE Amphetamine sensitization alters hippocampal neuronal morphology and memory and learning behaviors 1,2,5 1,2 1 Luis Enrique Arroyo-García ● Hiram Tendilla-Beltrán ● Rubén Antonio Vázquez-Roque ● 1 3 3 3 1 Erick Ernesto Jurado-Tapia ● Alfonso Díaz ● Patricia Aguilar-Alonso ● Eduardo Brambila ● Eduardo Monjaraz ● 2 4 1 Fidel De La Cruz ● Antonio Rodríguez-Moreno ● Gonzalo Flores Received: 12 November 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2020 / Accepted: 3 June 2020 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020 Abstract It is known that continuous abuse of amphetamine (AMPH) results in alterations in neuronal structure and cognitive behaviors related to the reward system. However, the impact of AMPH abuse on the hippocampus remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the damage caused by AMPH in the hippocampus in an addiction model. We reproduced the AMPH sensitization model proposed by Robinson et al. in 1997 and performed the novel object recognition test (NORt) to evaluate learning and memory behaviors. After the NORt, we performed Golgi–Cox staining, a 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: stereological cell count, immunohistochemistry to determine the presence of GFAP, CASP3, and MT-III, and evaluated oxidative stress in the hippocampus. We found that AMPH treatment generates impairment in short- and long-term memories and a decrease in neuronal density in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. The morphological test showed an increase in the total dendritic length, but a decrease in the number of mature spines in the CA1 region. GFAP labeling increased in the CA1 region and MT-III increased in the CA1 and CA3 regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Two Methodological Paradigms of Conditioned Place Preference with Methlyphenidate
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Undergraduate Honors Theses Student Works 12-2013 Comparison between Two Methodological Paradigms of Conditioned Place Preference with Methlyphenidate. Bryce D. Watson East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/honors Part of the Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Watson, Bryce D., "Comparison between Two Methodological Paradigms of Conditioned Place Preference with Methlyphenidate." (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 89. https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/89 This Honors Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Watson 1 Comparison between Two Methodological Paradigms of Conditioned Place Preference with Methlyphenidate By Bryce Watson The Honors College Honors in Discipline Program East Tennessee State University Department of Psychology December 9, 2013 Russell Brown, Faculty Mentor David Harker, Faculty Reader Eric Sellers, Faculty Reader Watson 2 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to examine the mechanisms of Methylphenidate (MPH) on Conditioned Place Preference (CPP), a behavioral test of reward. The psychostimulant MPH is therapeutically used in the treatment of ADHD, but has been implicated in many pharmacological actions related to drug addiction and is considered to have abuse potential. Past work in our lab and others have shown substantial sex-differences in the neuropharmacological profile of MPH. Here a discussion of the relevant mechanisms of action of MPH and its relationship to neurotrophins and CPP are reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • D, Dopamine Receptor Activation Is Necessary for the Induction of Sensitization by Amphetamine in the Ventral Tegmental Area
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 1996, 76(7):241 l-2420 D, Dopamine Receptor Activation Is Necessary for the Induction of Sensitization by Amphetamine in the Ventral Tegmental Area Paul Vezina Department of Psychiatry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 6063 7 Repeated intermittent exposure to amphetamine produces injections of amphetamine. In the second experiment, locomo- long-term enhancements in the ability of this drug to produce tor sensitization induced by infusion of amphetamine into the locomotion and increase extracellular dopamine (DA) in the ventral tegmental area (WA) was blocked when these injections nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Three experiments were con- were preceded by systemic injections of SCH23390. Finally, in ducted to evaluate the role played by D, DA receptors in the experiment three, co-injecting SCH23390, but not its inactive production of these changes in response to amphetamine. Rats enantiomer, with amphetamine into the VTA during preexpo- were preexposed to amphetamine, alone or with a DA receptor sure prevented sensitization of the NAcc DA response to this antagonist, and tested for sensitization l-3 weeks after the last drug. These results indicate that while D, DA receptor activa- drug injection. On the test for sensitization, locomotor (experi- tion is not necessary for the induction of locomotor sensitiza- ments 1 and 2) and NAcc DA (experiment 3) responses of the tion to amphetamine, D, DA receptors located in the VTA play animals to a systemic amphetamine injection were assessed. In a critical role in the development of sensitized locomotor and the first experiment, systemic injections of the D, DA receptor NAcc DA response to this drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonparaphilic Sexual Addiction Mark Kahabka
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 63 | Number 4 Article 2 11-1-1996 Nonparaphilic Sexual Addiction Mark Kahabka Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kahabka, Mark (1996) "Nonparaphilic Sexual Addiction," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 63: No. 4, Article 2. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol63/iss4/2 Nonparaphilic Sexual Addiction by Mr. Mark Kahabka The author is a recent graduate from the Master's program in Pastoral Counseling at Saint Paul University in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Impulse control disorders of a sexual nature have probably plagued humankind from its beginnings. Sometimes classified today as "sexual addiction" or "nonparaphilic sexual addiction,"l it has been labeled by at least one professional working within the field as "'The World's Oldest/Newest Perplexity."'2 Newest, because for the most part, the only available data until recently has come from those working within the criminal justice system and as Patrick Carnes points out, "they never see the many addicts who have not been arrested."3 By definition, both paraphilic4 and nonparaphilic sexual disorders "involve intense sexual urges and fantasies" and which the "individual repeatedly acts on these urges or is highly distressed by them .. "5 Such disorders were at one time categorized under the classification of neurotic obsessions and compulsions, and thus were usually labeled as disorders of an obsessive compulsive nature. Since those falling into this latter category, however, perceive such obessions and compulsions as "an unwanted invasion of consciousness"6 (in contrast to sexual impulse control disorders, which are "inherently pleasurable and consciously desired"7) they are now placed under the "impulse control disorder" category.s To help clarify the distinction: The purpose of the compulsions is to reduce anxiety, which often stems from unwanted but intrusive thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Addiction
    Molecular Mechanisms of Addiction Eric J. Nestler Nash Family Professor The Friedman Brain Institute Medical Model of Addiction • Pathophysiology - To identify changes that drugs produce in a vulnerable brain to cause addiction. • Individual Risk - To identify specific genes and non-genetic factors that determine an individual’s risk for (or resistance to) addiction. - About 50% of the risk for addiction is genetic. Only through an improved understanding of the biology of addiction will it be possible to develop better treatments and eventually cures and preventive measures. Scope of Drug Addiction • 25% of the U.S. population has a diagnosis of drug abuse or addiction. • 50% of U.S. high school graduates have tried an illegal drug; use of alcohol and tobacco is more common. • >$400 billion incurred annually in the U.S. by addiction: - Loss of life and productivity - Medical consequences (e.g., AIDS, lung cancer, cirrhosis) - Crime and law enforcement Diverse Chemical Substances Cause Addiction • Opiates (morphine, heroin, oxycontin, vicodin) • Cocaine • Amphetamine and like drugs (methamphetamine, methylphenidate) • MDMA (ecstasy) • PCP (phencyclidine or angel dust; also ketamine) • Marijuana (cannabinoids) • Tobacco (nicotine) • Alcohol (ethanol) • Sedative/hypnotics (barbiturates, benzodiazepines) Chemical Structures of Some Drugs of Abuse Cocaine Morphine Ethanol Nicotine ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol Drugs of Abuse Use of % of US population as weekly users 100 25 50 75 0 Definition of Drug Addiction • Loss of control over drug use. • Compulsive drug seeking and drug taking despite horrendous adverse consequences. • Increased risk for relapse despite years of abstinence. Definition of Drug Addiction • Tolerance – reduced drug effect after repeated use. • Sensitization – increased drug effect after repeated use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Addictive Potential of Sexual Behavior (Impulse) Review2
    Page 1 of 9 Impulse: The Premier Journal for Undergraduate Publications in the Neurosciences Submitted for Publication January, 2018 The Addictive Potential of Sexual Behavior Heather Bool D’Youville College, Buffalo, New York This paper examines the addictive potential of sexual behavior through behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms analogous to other formalized addictions. Sexual behavior refers to any action or thought preformed with the intention of sexual gratification, such as the consumption of explicit material, masturbation, fantasizing of sexual scenarios, and sexual intercourse. Addiction is defined by the presence of tolerance, preoccupation, withdrawal, dependence, and the continuation of behavior despite risk and/or harm. Sexual addiction demonstrates high relapse potential due to the frequency of reward-associated cues encountered in daily life, and the low effort and risk required for sexual pleasure. Currently, sexual addiction lacks a formal diagnosis despite behavioral, psychological, and physiological evidence. An official diagnosis recognized by a governing authority, such as the American Psychological Association, would offer greater access to treatment, funding for research, and exposure and education for the general public about this disorder. Abbreviations: None Keywords: Sexual Behavior; Addiction; Sexual Addiction; Neurophysiology; Behavioral Neuroscience Introduction “Sexual addiction” is an umbrella term Confusion remains regarding the for sexual impulsivity, sexual compulsivity, out- etiology and nosology of sexual addiction, of-control sexual behavior, hypersexual which has led to the lack of a universally behavior or disorder, sexually excessive accepted criterion and, more importantly, the behavior or disorder, Don Jaunism, satyriasis, absence of a formal diagnosis. A lack of and obsessive-compulsive sexual behavior operationalization of the disorder has severe (Beech et al., 2009; Karila et al., 2014; effects on research; due to the use of Rosenberg et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Sensitization Model
    The Stress Sensitization Model Oxford Handbooks Online The Stress Sensitization Model Catherine B. Stroud The Oxford Handbook of Stress and Mental Health Edited by Kate Harkness and Elizabeth P. Hayden Subject: Psychology, Clinical Psychology Online Publication Date: Jun 2018 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190681777.013.16 Abstract and Keywords The stress sensitization model was developed to explain the mechanism through which the relationship between stress and affective disorder onsets changes across the course of the disorder. The model posits that individuals become sensitized to stress over time, such that the level of stress needed to trigger episode onsets becomes increasingly lower with successive episodes. The stress sensitization model has accrued empirical support in the context of major depression and to a lesser extent in bipolar spectrum disorders. Furthermore, expanding upon the original stress sensitization model, research also indicates that early adversity (i.e., early childhood experiences) sensitizes individuals to subsequent proximal stress, increasing risk for psychopathology. In this chapter, the theoretical background underlying the stress sensitization model is reviewed, and research evidence investigating stress sensitization is evaluated. In addition, moderators and mechanisms of stress sensitization effects are reviewed, and recommendations for future research are provided. Keywords: stress sensitization, kindling, early adversity, childhood maltreatment, life events The nature of the relationship between stress
    [Show full text]
  • Turner Et Al 2018B for Repository.Pdf
    This is a repository copy of Repeated intermittent oral amphetamine administration results in locomotor tolerance not sensitization. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/127130/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Turner, A., Stramek, A., Kraev, I. et al. (3 more authors) (2018) Repeated intermittent oral amphetamine administration results in locomotor tolerance not sensitization. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32 (8). pp. 949-954. ISSN 0269-8811 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118763984 Turner AC, Stramek A, Kraev I, Stewart MG, Overton PG, Dommett EJ. Repeated intermittent oral amphetamine administration results in locomotor tolerance not sensitization. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2018;32(8):949-954. Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/0269881118763984. Article available under the terms of the CC- BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Turner et al. Repeated intermittent oral amphetamine administration results in locomotor tolerance not sensitization Amy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditioned Locomotion Is Not Correlated with Behavioral Sensitization to Cocaine: an Intra-Laboratory Multi-Sample Analysis Gregory Hotsenpiller, Ph.D., and Marina E
    Conditioned Locomotion Is Not Correlated with Behavioral Sensitization to Cocaine: An Intra-Laboratory Multi-Sample Analysis Gregory Hotsenpiller, Ph.D., and Marina E. Wolf, Ph.D. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the of training, all subjects were tested with the conditioned importance of associative factors in regulating craving for stimuli in the absence of drug and conditioned locomotion drugs of abuse. To model these conditioned effects, we have was measured. The response of Unpaired subjects on the last examine cue-induced conditioned locomotion in rodents. The training day was positively correlated with their response on present study involved analysis of several of our prior studies test day, as expected since both days were nearly identical to evaluate the relationship between conditioned locomotion (stimuli presented without cocaine). However, for Paired and behavioral sensitization using a within-subjects analysis. subjects, the magnitude of conditioned locomotion on the Both are animal models used to study addiction, so it is drug-free test day was not positively correlated with the important to know if one is predictive of the other, and more magnitude of behavioral sensitization. These results generally, if drug effects are predictive of conditioned effects. underscore the importance of focusing research on drug-free In all of our studies, Paired subjects received cocaine during conditioned behaviors when attempting to model conditioned presentation of conditioned stimuli while Unpaired subjects responses to drug related cues in human addicts. received saline with the stimuli and cocaine at the home cages [Neuropsychopharmacology 27:924–929, 2002] an hour later. Paired subjects typically displayed behavioral © 2002 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
    [Show full text]
  • Attenuated Response to Methamphetamine Sensitization
    Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Attenuated response to methamphetamine sensitization and deficits in motor learning and memory after selective deletion of b-catenin in dopamine neurons Oscar Diaz-Ruiz,1 YaJun Zhang,1 Lufei Shan,1 Nasir Malik,1 Alexander F. Hoffman,2 Bruce Ladenheim,3 Jean Lud Cadet,3 Carl R. Lupica,2 Adriana Tagliaferro,4 Alicia Brusco,4 and Cristina M. Ba¨ckman1,5 1Integrative Neuroscience Section, 2Electrophysiology Research Section, 3Molecular Neuropsychiatry Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA; 4Instituto de Biologı´a Celular y Neurociencias, UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires 1120, Argentina In the present study, we analyzed mice with a targeted deletion of b-catenin in DA neurons (DA-bcat KO mice) to address the functional significance of this molecule in the shaping of synaptic responses associated with motor learning and follow- ing exposure to drugs of abuse. Relative to controls, DA-bcat KO mice showed significant deficits in their ability to form long-term memories and displayed reduced expression of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization after subse- quent challenge doses with this drug, suggesting that motor learning and drug-induced learning plasticity are altered in these mice. Morphological analyses showed no changes in the number or distribution of tyrosine hydroxylase-labeled neurons in the ventral midbrain. While electrochemical measurements in the striatum determined no changes in acute DA release and uptake, a small but significant decrease in DA release was detected in mutant animals after prolonged re- petitive stimulation, suggesting a possible deficit in the DA neurotransmitter vesicle reserve pool.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognition-Enhancing Effects of Psychostimulants Involve Direct Action in the Prefrontal Cortex
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works School of Osteopathic Medicine Faculty Scholarship School of Osteopathic Medicine 6-1-2015 The Cognition-Enhancing Effects of Psychostimulants Involve Direct Action in the Prefrontal Cortex Robert C. Spencer University of Wisconsin-Madison David M. DeVilbiss Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine Craig Berridge University of Wisconsin-Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/som_facpub Part of the Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, Pharmacology Commons, and the Psychiatry Commons Recommended Citation Spencer RC, Devilbiss DM, Berridge CW. The cognition-enhancing effects of psychostimulants involve direct action in the prefrontal cortex. Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 1;77(11):940-50. Epub 2014 Sep 28. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.013. PMID: 25499957. PMCID: PMC4377121. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Osteopathic Medicine Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptBiol Psychiatry Author Manuscript. Author Author Manuscript manuscript; available in PMC 2016 June 01. Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2015 June 1; 77(11): 940–950. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.09.013. The Cognition-Enhancing Effects of Psychostimulants Involve Direct Action in the Prefrontal Cortex Robert C. Spencer, David M. Devilbiss, and Craig W. Berridge* Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI Abstract Psychostimulants are highly effective in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The clinical efficacy of these drugs is strongly linked to their ability to improve cognition dependent on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and extended frontostriatal circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Enduring Changes in Brain and Behavior Produced by Chronic Amphetamine Administration: a Review and Evaluation of Animal Models of Amphetamine Psychosis
    Brain Research Reviews, 11 (1986) 157-198 157 Elsevier BRR 90048 Enduring Changes in Brain and Behavior Produced by Chronic Amphetamine Administration: A Review and Evaluation of Animal Models of Amphetamine Psychosis TERRY E. ROBINSON and JILL B. BECKER Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Laboratory Building, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, M148104-1687 (U.S.A.) (Accepted December 31st, 1985) Key words: amphetamine -- sensitization -- reverse tolerance -- dopamine -- catecholamine -- schizophrenia -- amphetamine psychosis -- animal model -- striatum-- stress-- sex difference -- conditioning-- neurotoxicity -- stereotypy -- autoreceptor CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 158 2. The effects of continuous amphetamine administration on brain and behavior (amphetamine neurotoxicity) ..................... 159 3. The behavioral consequences of repeated intermittent amphetamine administration (behavioral sensitization) ................. 160 3 1. The major characteristics of behavioral sensitization .................................................................................... 161 3.1.1. Behavior .................................................................................................................................. 161 3.1.2. Injection paradigm ..................................................................................................................... 163 3.1.3. Sex differences
    [Show full text]