Airplane H-868

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airplane H-868 TECH LIBRARY KAFB. NM ___~~~.~ ~~ " . ~- ~ , I 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA CR-2561 "~- I ~ "" "~"" I"I b' I 4. Title and Subtitle Date I 5. Report I June 1975 APPLICATION OF ACTIVE CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY TO THE 6. Performing Organization Cod8 NASA JETSTAR AIRPLANE H-868 -. .. .. .- - - 7. Author(s1 8. Performing Organization Report No. R. H. Lange, J. F. Cahill, M. C. Campion, E. S. Bradley, D. G. MacWilkinson and J. W. Phillips " ~ 10. Work Unit ." ~~ ~~~ .. No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Lockheed-Georgia Company [11. Contractor Grant No. Marietta, Georgia NAS4-2121 '13.Type Report and Period ~ .- -. "". - --. ~~ ~ of Covered 12. SponsoringAgency Name andAddress Contractor Report - Final National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. SponsoringAgency Code Washington, D. C. 20546 ".. ""I 15. Supplementary Notes NASA Technical Monitor: Dwain A. Deets, NASA Flight Research Center 16. Abstract A study has been made of the feasibility of modifying a JetStar air- plane into a demonstrator of benefits to be achieved from incorporating active control concepts in the preliminary design of transport type air- craft. Substantial benefits are shown in terms of fuel economy and community noise by virtue of reduction in induced drag through use of a high aspect ratio wing which is made possible by a gust alleviation system. An intermediate configuration was defined which helps to isolate the benefits produced by active controls technology from those due to other configuration variables. Also, an alternate configura- tion which incorporated composite structures, but not active controls technology, was defined in order to compare the benefits of composite structures with those of active controls technology. 117. Key117. (SuggestedWords Author(s)) by I 18. Distribution Statement Active controls technology Control-configured vehicle Unclassified - Unlimited Supercritical wing STAR Category 05 Design techniques 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) NO. of Pages 22. Rice'21. Unclassified Unclassified 206 $7.25 *For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 TABLE OF CONTENTS -Page LIST OF FIGURES V LIST OF TABLES xi SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 SYMBOLS 3 ABBREVIATIONS 9 STUDY OBJECTIVES, TECHNICAL APPROACH, AND 10 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Study Objectives ' 10 Technical Approach 10 Design Requirements 11 METHODOLOGY AND BASIC DATA 15 Aerodynamic Data 15 Struc tura I Loads Data 16 Design Integration 16 Active Control System Development 17 ACT CONFIGURATION DEFINITION 18 Parametric Analysis 18 Wing Definition 18 Empennage Sizing and Definition 19 Control Surface Definition 20 Loads 20 FI utter 20 Configuration Description 21 Weight Summary 21 Airplane Performance 21 Active Controls System Implementation 24 Active Controls System Redundancy 27 INTERMEDIATE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION 31 Parametric Analysis 31 Selection Procedure 31 ...Ill P TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) -Page High Lift Data 32 Design Integration 33 Weight Summary 33 ALTERNATE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION 35 Parametric Analysis 36 Design Integration 36 Weight Summary 37 Performance 38 ACTIVE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY BENEFIT ANALYSIS 39 Ride Qualities 39 Community Noise Reduction 39 performance Improvement 40 Weight Comparison 40 BENEFIT PROJECTIONS FOR NEW DESIGNS 42 STUDY CONCLUSIONS 42 REFERENCES 43 APPENDIX A - AERODYNAMIC DATA AND DESIGN RATIONALE 45 APPENDIX B - STRUCTURAL LOADS ANALYSIS FOR THE ACT 53 CONFIGURATION APPENDIX C - DESIGN INTEGRATION 67 APPENDIX REFERENCES 77 FIGURES 78 IV FIGURES -Page 1. Study Plan 78 2. Center of Gravity Envelope 79 3. Structural Design Airspeeds 80 4. Wing Thickness Ratio 81 5. ACT Configuration Operating Weight and 82 Mission Fuel Requirement Matrix 6. Selection of ACT Configuration 83 7. Wing Twist and Camber 84 8. Effect of Trim and Stability on Horizontal Tai I Volume 85 9. Effect of Horizontal Tail Volume on 86 Short Period Damping 10. Vertical Tail Sizing 87 11. Dutch-rol I Requirements 88 12. ACT Configuration Empennage Geometry 89 13. ACT Airplane Configuration 90 14. ACT Airplane Wing Layout 91 15. ACT Configuration Low SpeedDrag Polars 92 16. ACT Clean Configuration Drag Polars 93 17. ACT Configuration Specific Range Data, 94 1 0668 M (35 000 Ft ) 18. ACT Configuration Specific Range Data, 95 11277.6 M (37000 Ft) 19. ACT Configuration Specific Range Data, 96 11887.2 M (39000 Ft) 20. ACT Configuration Specific Range Data, 97 12801.6 M (41 000 Ft) 21. ACT Configuration Specific Range Data, 98 131 06.4 M (43000 Ft) 22. ACT Configuration Specific RangeData, 99 13716 M (45000 Ft) V FIGURES (CONT'D) -Page 23. Command Control Added to Stability Augmentation 100 24. Flight Controls Pitch Axis 101 25. Lateral-Directional Augmentation 1 02 26. Lateral-Directional Stability Derivatives 103 27. Power Servo Mechanization 104 28. Mission Fuel Requirement and Operating Weight, 1a5 Intermediate Configuration 29. Intermediate Configuration Effect of Sweep on Ride 106 Discomfort index 30. Intermediate Configuration Selection 107 31. Intermediate Configuration LOW Speed Drag Polars 108 32. Intermediate Configuration 109 33. Intermediate Airplane Wing Layout 110 34. Alternate Configuration Mission Fuel and 111 Operating Weight 35. Alternate Configuration Selection 112 36. Alternate Configuration 113 37. Alternate Airplane Wing Layout 114 38. High-Lift Performance Comparison 115 39. Noise Profile Comparison FAR 36 Rules EPNdB 116 A1 . Experimental Lift and Moment Data 117 A2 Supercritical Wing Transonic Characteristics 118 A3. JetStar Model 1329-6A 119 Clean Configuration Drag Polars A4. JetStar Model 1329-6A Wing Fxternal Tank Drag 120 A5. JetstarModel 1329-6A Drag-Rise Characteristics 121 A6. Tail-Off Pitching Moment Characteristics 122 A7. Airfoil Lift Pitch Characteristics 123 A8. Full Scale Corrections to Maximum Lift Coefficient 124 vi FIGURES KONT'D) -page A9. Tail-Off Lift and Pitch Characteristics 125 A1 0. Wing Lift Characteristics 126 All. Wing Pitching Moment Characteristics 127 A12. Wing Basic Lift Distribution 128 A13. Wing Additional Lift Distribution 129 A14. Wing Aerodynamic Center Distribution 130 A15. Wing Basic Pitching Moment Distribution 131 A16. Wing Geometry for Loads Estimation 132 A17. Flap Effectiveness 133 A18. Flap Load Distributions 134 A19. Flap Hinge Moment Coefficients 135 A20. Wing Lift Distribution - AR = 9 MACH No. = 0.80 136 A21. Wing Pitching Moment Distribution - 137 AR = 9 MACH No.= 0.80 A22. Incremental Wing Lift Distribution Due to 138 Flap Deflection A23. Incremental Moment Distribution Due to 139 Flap Deflection A24. Incremental Lift Distribution Due to 140 Flap Deflection A25. Incremental Moment Distribution Due to 141 Flap Deflection A26. Incremental Lift Distribution Due to 142 Flap Deflection A27. Incremental Moment Distribution heto 143 Flap Deflection A28. Incremental Lift Distribution Due to 144 Flap Deflection vi i .. FIGURES (CONT'D) \ -Puge A29. IncrementalMoment Distribution Due to 1 45 Flap Deflection A30. Flap Effectiveness 146 A31 . Airplane Lift and Pitch Characteristics 147 A32. ComparisonAirplaneCharacteristics Lift of 148 A33. Comparison of AirplanePitching MomentCharacteristics 149 B1. SelectionStudy of Gust Condition 150 B2. Rigid Gust Response, No Active Controls 151 Up and Down Gusts B3. Assumed Flap Rate VariationWith HingeMoment 152 B4. Rigid Gust Response, Datum Control System 153 Up and Down Gusts B5. Rigid Gust Response,Datum Control System 154 Reduced C , Up and Down Gust h 0 B6. Effect of Elevator Gain, GE 155 B7. Effect of Flap and Elevator Gains 156 B8. Effect of Flap Time Constant, r (Washout ) 157 B9. Effect of Elevator Sensor Location 158 B10. Effect of Control Surface Rate - 6 159 611. Effect of Flap Hinge Moment at a= 0 160 B12. Effect of Elevator Gain, G 161 E B13. Effect of FlapConstant, t (Washout) 162 B14. Effect of Control Surface Rate, 6 163 815 Effect of Flap Hinge Moment at a= 0 164 B16. Effect of Gust Velocity, w 1 65 G viii FIGURES (CONT'D) Page 817. Rigid Response to Step Elevator, 166 Effect of Elevator Gain B18. Maneuver Load Variation with Elevator Gain, G 167 E B19. Flexible Upgust Response, No Active Controls 168 820. Flexible Downgust Response, No Active Controls 169 821. Wiq Root Bending Moment 170 B22. C. G. LoadFactor 171 B23. F!exible UpGust Response, 172 Effect of Lag Plus Washout Filter B24. Flexible Downgust Response, 173 Effect of Lag Plus Washout Fi I ter B25. Flexible Wing Root Bending Moment 174 B26. Effect of Flap Washout Filter Gain 175 B27. Effect of Flap Lag Filter Gain 176 828. Effect of Flap Washout and Lag Filter Gains 177 829. Effect of Flap No-Load Rate - io 178 830. Effect of Flap No-Load Rate - do 179 B31. Effect of Elevator Gain 180 832. Structural Design Airspeeds and Flutter Design Point 181 833. Typical Flutter Analysis Results Symmetric Case - 182 Empty Fuel B34. Effect of Fuel on Wing Flutter Speed 183 B35. Wing Stiffness 184 Cl. Jetstar Model 1329-6A General Arrangement 185 C3. JetStar Existing Center Section Structure 186 c3. Geometric Effects of Wing Sweep 187 c4. GeometryBaseline Wing 0 188 IX FIGURES KONT'D) -Page c5. ACT AirplaneWing Attachment 189 Frame Modification C6. IntermediateandAlternate Configurations 190 Effect of Sweep on Thickness c7. Wing Thickness at MLG Constraint 191 (For .524 Rad (30 Deg) Sweep) C8. Inboard FlapClearance Constraint 192 (For .524 Rad (30 Deg) Sweep) c9. RearSpar Location Constraint 193 (For .524 Rad (30 Deg) Sweep) c10. Effect Geometricalof Constraintson 194 Aspect Ratio and Fuel Weight
Recommended publications
  • Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84
    Aerospace Facts and Figures 1983/84 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997-3289 $9.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1983 by Aerospace Industries Association o' \merica, Inc. · Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 2 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-4600 Director Research Center Virginia C. Lopez Manager Economic Data Service Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty 3 ,- Acknowledgments Air Transport Association of America Battelle Memorial Institute Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw-Hill Publications Company National Aer~mautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Industrial Economics) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration The cover and chapter art throughout this edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures feature computer-inspired graphics-hot an original theme in the contemporary business environment, but one particularly relevant to the aerospace industry, which spawned the large-scale development and application of computers, and conti.nues to incorpora~e computer advances in all aspects of its design and manufacture of aircraft, mis­ siles, and space products.
    [Show full text]
  • B-162897 Aircraft Owned Or Leased By
    Dear Mr, Thompson: Reference is made to your letter of February 10, 1970, requesting that we update information which we furnished to you in a report dated March 4, 1968, relative to aircraft owned or leased by the Federal Avia- 1 tion Administration (FAA). In accordance with this request, we are fur- nishing you the following information. 1. Inventory of active aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, 1968, 1969, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure I). 2. Installed passenger capacity and cost of aircraft owned as of June 30, 1967, and January 1, 1970 (enclosure II). 3. Aircraft leased or on loan during the period July 1, 1967, through June 30, 1969 (enclosure III). 4. Aircraft mazntenance, maJor overhaul, and modification costs by aircraft type, for fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure IV). 5. Average cost per flxght hour by aircraft type, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure V>. 6. Aircraft utilization by aircraft type and maJor cate- gories, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VI). 7. Utilization and cost of open market rental aircraft, fiscal years 1968 and 1969 (enclosure VII). In addition, you requested that we advise you of the progress that has been made in establishing a uniform maintenance and operating cost re- porting system for all FAA owned and leased aircraft. As shown zn our March 4, 1968, report, FhCl had 101 aircraft which cost approximately $46 mzlllon 1n its inventory of active aircraft as of June 30, 1967. On January 1, 1970, the number of active air craft had decreased Co 98; however, the cost of the aircraft in the inventory was approximately $52 million, This increase was the net result of.
    [Show full text]
  • General Files Series, 1932-75
    GENERAL FILE SERIES Table of Contents Subseries Box Numbers Subseries Box Numbers Annual Files Annual Files 1933-36 1-3 1957 82-91 1937 3-4 1958 91-100 1938 4-5 1959 100-110 1939 5-7 1960 110-120 1940 7-9 1961 120-130 1941 9-10 1962 130-140 1942-43 10 1963 140-150 1946 10 1964 150-160 1947 11 1965 160-168 1948 11-12 1966 168-175 1949 13-23 1967 176-185 1950-53 24-53 Social File 186-201 1954 54-63 Subject File 202-238 1955 64-76 Foreign File 239-255 1956 76-82 Special File 255-263 JACQUELINE COCHRAN PAPERS GENERAL FILES SERIES CONTAINER LIST Box No. Contents Subseries I: Annual Files Sub-subseries 1: 1933-36 Files 1 Correspondence (Misc. planes) (1)(2) [Miscellaneous Correspondence 1933-36] [memo re JC’s crash at Indianapolis] [Financial Records 1934-35] (1)-(10) [maintenance of JC’s airplanes; arrangements for London - Melbourne race] Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1934 (1)-(7) 2 Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1935 (1)(2) Edmund Jakobi 1934 Re: G.B. Plane Return from England Just, G.W. 1934 Leonard, Royal (Harlan Hull) 1934 London Flight - General (1)-(12) London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables General (1)-(5) [cable file of Royal Leonard, FBO’s London agent, re preparations for race] 3 London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Fueling Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Hangar Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Insurance [London - Melbourne Flight Instructions] (1)(2) McLeod, Fred B. [Fred McLeod Correspondence July - August 1934] (1)-(3) Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power for Flight: NASA's Contributions To
    The Power Power The forFlight NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion for for Flight Jeremy R. Kinney ThePower for NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion Flight Jeremy R. Kinney Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Kinney, Jeremy R., author. Title: The power for flight : NASA’s contributions to aircraft propulsion / Jeremy R. Kinney. Description: Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027182 (print) | LCCN 2017028761 (ebook) | ISBN 9781626830387 (Epub) | ISBN 9781626830370 (hardcover) ) | ISBN 9781626830394 (softcover) Subjects: LCSH: United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration– Research–History. | Airplanes–Jet propulsion–Research–United States– History. | Airplanes–Motors–Research–United States–History. Classification: LCC TL521.312 (ebook) | LCC TL521.312 .K47 2017 (print) | DDC 629.134/35072073–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027182 Copyright © 2017 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Table of Contents Dedication v Acknowledgments vi Foreword vii Chapter 1: The NACA and Aircraft Propulsion, 1915–1958.................................1 Chapter 2: NASA Gets to Work, 1958–1975 ..................................................... 49 Chapter 3: The Shift Toward Commercial Aviation, 1966–1975 ...................... 73 Chapter 4: The Quest for Propulsive Efficiency, 1976–1989 ......................... 103 Chapter 5: Propulsion Control Enters the Computer Era, 1976–1998 ........... 139 Chapter 6: Transiting to a New Century, 1990–2008 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Horizons
    3 F R To properly plan for the future of Coolidge facilities will be evaluated in Chapter Four Municipal Airport, it is necessary to trans- to determine the most cost-effective and late forecast aviation demand into the efficient means for implementation. specific types and quantities of facilities that can adequately serve this identified demand. This chapter uses the results of the PLANNING HORIZONS forecasts conducted in Chapter Two, as well as established planning criteria, to The cost-effective, efficient, and orderly determine the airside (i.e., runways, development of an airport should rely more taxiways, navigational aids, marking and upon actual demand at an airport than on a lighting) and landside (i.e., terminal build- time-based forecast figure. In order to ing, hangars, aircraft parking apron, and develop a Master Plan that is demand-based automobile parking) facility requirements. rather than time-based, a series of planning horizon milestones have been established The objective of this effort is to identify, in for Coolidge Municipal Airport that take general terms, the adequacy of the existing into consideration the reasonable range of airport facilities, outline what new facilities aviation demand projections prepared in the may be needed, and when these may be previous chapter. needed to accommodate forecast demands. Having established these facility require- ments, alternatives for providing these 3-1 It is important to consider that the ac- airport to develop facilities according tual activity at the airport may be to need generated by actual demand higher or lower than projected activity levels. The demand-based schedule levels. By planning according to activ- provides flexibility in development, as ity milestones, the resulting plan can development schedules can be slowed accommodate unexpected shifts, or or expedited according to actual de- changes, in the area’s aviation de- mand at any given time during the mand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010
    THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by MASSACHUSETTS INSTME OF TECHNOLOGY ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ UL02 1 B.S., Aerospace Engineering University of Notre Dame (2008) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 0 2012 Alexander Andrew Wulz. All rights reserved. .The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ..................................................................... .. ...................... Department of Aeronautr and Astronautics n n May 11, 2012 Certified by ............................................................................ Peter P. Belobaba Principle Research Scientist of Aeronautics and Astronautics / Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ................................................................... Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 11, 2012 in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ABSTRACT The main objective of this thesis is to explore the evolution of U.S. commercial domestic aircraft operations from 1991 to 2010 and describe the implications for future U.S. commercial domestic fleets. Using data collected from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, we analyze 110 different aircraft types from 145 airlines operating U.S. commercial domestic service between 1991 and 2010. We classify the aircraft analyzed into four categories: turboprop, regional jet, narrow-body, and wide-body.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 ALP Chapter
    CHAPTER TWO Airport Facility Requirements ChapterChapter OneOne To properly plan for the future of Livermore DESIGN CRITERIA Municipal Airport, it is necessary to translate forecast aviation demand into the speciic types The FAA publishes Advisory Circular (AC) and quantities of facilities that can adequately 150/5300-13A, Airport Design, to guide serve the identiied demand. This chapter uses airport planning. The AC provides guidance the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on various design elements of an airport approved forecasts, as well as established intended to maintain or improve safety at air- planning criteria, to determine the airside (i.e., ports. The design standards include airport runways, taxiways, navigational aids, marking elements such as runways, taxiways, safety and lighting) and landside (i.e., hangars, aircraft areas, and separation distances. According parking apron, and automobile parking) to the AC, "airport planning should consider facility requirements. both the present and potential aviation needs and demand associated with the airport." The objective of this effort is to identify, in Consideration should be given to planning general terms, the adequacy of the existing runway and taxiway locations that will meet airport facilities and outline what new future separation requirements even if the facilities may be needed, and when these may width, strength, and length must increase be needed to accommodate forecast demands. later. Such decisions should be supported by A recommended airport layout concept will the aviation demand forecasts, coordinated be presented that consolidates all facility with the FAA, and shown on the Airport requirements into a single development Layout Plan (ALP). concept for the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • MS-294 Title: Seymour Dunham Collection Dates
    MS-294, Seymour Dunham Collection Collection Number: MS-294 Title: Seymour Dunham Collection Dates: 1889-1993 Creator: Dunham, Seymour, 1910-1996 Summary/Abstract: The Seymour Dunham Collection contains personal correspondence of Mr. Dunham, information on aviation organizations to which he belonged, aircraft and missile research, work-related research from his time at Wright-Patterson AFB, and an extensive collection of articles, newspaper clippings and photographs concerning the Wright Brothers and other aspects of aviation history. Quantity/Physical Description: 22 linear feet Language(s): English Repository: Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435-0001, (937) 775-2092 Restrictions on Access: There are no restrictions on accessing material in this collection. Restrictions on Use: Copyright restrictions may apply. Unpublished manuscripts are protected by copyright. Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder. Preferred Citation: MS-294, Seymour Dunham Collection, Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio Acquisition: The Seymour Dunham Collection was accessioned into Dunbar Library’s Special Collections and Archives in January 1998. Mr. Seymour Dunham, a local aeronautical engineer and aircraft history enthusiast, donated the collection to the archives. Related Material: MS-1, Wright Brothers Collection MS-88, Max Baker Aviation Collection MS-194, Charles Harris Papers MS-223, William F. Yeager Aviation Collection MS-294: Seymour Dunham Collection Page 1 of 65 MS-344, Walter Matthew Jefferies Aviation Collection MS-353, Robert L. Cavanagh Aviation Collection MS-387, Randle H. Egbert Aviation Collection Separated Material: Oversize materials for this collection can be found in Oversize Drawers 37, 38, and 81, as well as collection boxes 35-37.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation During the Eisenhower Era
    TRANSPORTATION DURING THE EISENHOWER ERA A Guide to the Historical Holdings in the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library Compiled by Herbert Pankratz Abilene, Kansas February 2005 PREFACE Dwight D. Eisenhower was witness to tremendous changes in transportation during his lifetime. In his boyhood years, horse-drawn wagons were a primary method of local travel in Abilene and trips for any distance were taken by train. By the end of his presidency he was overseeing a space program that was working to put satellites and astronauts in orbit around the earth. The 34th President experienced many forms of travel during his life. As a young adult, Eisenhower became familiar with automobiles and acquired his first roadster in 1916. In 1919 he participated in a transcontinental Army truck convoy which crossed the United States following the route of the old Lincoln Highway. The convoy traveled 3,251 miles in 62 days and averaged about six miles per hour. Ike and Mamie Eisenhower traveled to military posts in Panama, Europe, and the Philippines via ocean liners in the 1920s and 1930s. In the late 1930s Dwight Eisenhower learned to fly single-engine aircraft in the Philippines and obtained a pilot’s license. World War II and the 1940s saw further developments in propeller-driven aircraft and jet fighters. General Eisenhower used a variety of aircraft to travel to many different military outposts. He also experienced the value of a good highway system when he viewed the German autobahns. By the 1950s further improvements in propeller-driven aircraft, as well as the introduction of helicopters and jet liners made travel quicker and more convenient.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydra Ulic Po
    HYDRAULIC POWER (ATA-29) POWER HYDRAULIC Hydraulic Coupling Hose Adaptor Kits MULTIPLE AIRCRAFT HYDRAULIC PRESSURE & RETURN COUPLING KITS The kits contain couplings and dust plugs to adapt a hose to a specific aircraft bulkhead coupling. Specifications: See Hydraulic Power Order Instructions, Step #5 for HPU Coupling Designation (pg 75) HPU Coupling Kit Number Manufacturer/Aircraft Designation (qty) JA KHC-1008 (1) BAe 146 / Cessna Citation X / Fokker F-28 / Gulfstream GII-GV, G400, G500, G550 KHC-1038 (1) Cessna, Piper JB KHC-1008 (1) BAe 146 / Cessna Citation X / Fokker F-28 / Gulfstream GII-GV, G400, G500, G550 KHC-1009 (1) Boeing DC-9, MD-80 / Gulfstream GII-GV / Lockheed L-1011 JC KHC-1005 (1) BAE ATP / Bell 204, 205, 206L, 206LI, 214B, 222, 212, 412, 214ST Bombardier CL215 thru CL415, deHavilland Buffalo / Dassault/Falcon FalconJet / Eurocopter AS 330 Hawker Beechcraft HS125 / Lockheed Jetstar / Pilatus PC12 / Saberliner / Sikorsky S-61, S-70 KHC-1339 (1) Dassault/Falcon 900 JD KHC-1005 (1) BAE ATP / Bell 204, 205, 206L, 206LI, 214B, 222, 212, 412, 214ST Bombardier CL215 thru CL415, deHavilland Buffalo / Dassault/Falcon FalconJet / Eurocopter AS 330 Hawker Beechcraft HS125 / Lockheed Jetstar / Pilatus PC12 / Saberliner / Sikorsky S-61, S-70 KHC-1038 (1) Cessna / Piper JE KHC-2407 (1) Bombardier Learjet 45 KHC-2424 (1) Bombardier Learjet 45 (Reservoir) JF KHC-1017 (1) IAI Westwind KHC-1342 (1) Bombardier Canadair, Global Express / IAI Astra JG KHC-1005 (1) BAE ATP / Bell 204, 205, 206L, 206LI, 214B, 222, 212, 412, 214ST Bombardier
    [Show full text]
  • 501 .A818 197S...76 1975/76 Aerospace Facts and Figures
    TL 501 .A818 197S...76 1975/76 AEROSPACE FACTS AND FIGURES Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, ln,c. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-Hill PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N. V. 10020 $4.93 Per Copy 1975/76 Aerospace Facts and Figures Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 © Aerospace Industries Assoc. of America, Inc. Aerospace Research Center Director Allen H. Skaggs Chief Statistician Sally H. Bath Consultant Rudolf Mod~ey Acknowledgments Atomic Energy Commission Air Transport Association Civil Aeronautics Board Export-Import Bank of the l:lnited States Federal Trade Commission Gene"ral Aviation Manufacturers Association International Air Transport Association International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation U. S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census) Defense (Comptroller, Public Affairs, Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of J,.abor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration) 2 CONTENTS Page 4 FOREWORD 6 AEROSPACE SUMMARY 30 AIRCRAFT PRODUCTION 47 MISSILE PROGRAMS 57 SPACE PROGRAMS 70 AIR TRANSPORTATION 91 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 101 FOREIGN TRADE 115 EMPLOYMENT 125 FINANCE 134 GLOSSARY 138 INDEX FOREWORD This volume tells the statistical story of the aerospace industry's performance in 1974, the most economically troubled year in recent memory. It was a year of sharp recession, with attendant industrial disruption, unem­ ployment, materials shortages, insufficient investment capital, declining demand and myriad other difficulties. Most of all there was rampant inflation that snowballed into double-digit percentages. Beca use of this inflation, a word of qualification is in order with respect to the statistical detail of this edition of Aerospace Facts and Figures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revista Aérea Collection
    The Revista Aérea Collection Dan Hagedorn and Pedro Turina 2008 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series A: Aircraft...................................................................................................... 4 Series B: Propulsion............................................................................................. 218 Series C: Biography............................................................................................. 262 Series D: Organizations......................................................................................
    [Show full text]