Syria the NEW SCHAFF - HERZOG 228
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Book 45.Indb
İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, 45 (2021): 69-102 İslam’ın Erken Döneminde Şam Bölgesindeki Askerî-İdarî Bölgelerin (Cünd/Ecnâd) Oluşumu ve Bizans (Doğu Roma) Toprak Sisteminin Etkisi* Halil İbrahim Yılmaz** Lugatte “ordu, askerî birlik” anlamlarına gelen cünd (çoğulu: ecnâd), terim anlamıyla daha çok erken dönem İslam tarihinde Şam bölgesinde tesis edilen askerî-idarî böl- geleri ifade etmek için kullanılmıştır. Ninevâ (Ninova) savaşında Sâsânîler’i mağlup ederek bu bölgede yeniden hâkimiyet kuran Bizanslılar’ın elinde bulunan Şam bölgesi, müslümanların yaptıkları fetih harekâtının ardından İslam topraklarına dahil olmuş- tur. Fethinden sonra Şam bölgesinde başlangıçta Ürdün, Filistin, Dımaşk ve Humus cündleri kurulmuş, Emevîler döneminde ise bunlara beşinci cünd olarak Kınnesrîn eklenmiştir. İslam hâkimiyetindeki topraklar arasında yalnızca Şam bölgesinde uy- gulandığı tespit edilen cünd taksimatı, Abbâsîler döneminde de bazı değişikliklere uğramış, süreç içerisinde (özellikle Haçlı seferlerinin getirdiği kargaşa ortamıyla bir- likte) dağılmaya yüz tutmuş ve zamanla bu uygulama terkedilmiştir. Bu makalede Şam cündlerinin ne zaman kurulduğu, ne tür değişiklikler geçirdiği, kapsamı ve bünyesin- deki yerleşim yerleri ve ekonomik durumuna dair ayrıntılı bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Bununla birlikte cünd sisteminin, köken ve oluşum itibariyle ilk defa müslümanların teşkil ettikleri bir idarî sistem mi, yoksa yapısal anlamda önceki Bizans sisteminden mülhem mi sürdürüldüğü sorusunun yanıtı aranmaya çalışılmıştır. Sonuçta cünd sisteminin kuruluşunda kendi dinamiklerinin yanı sıra, birçok benzer yönlerinin bulunmasından dolayı önceki Bizans askerî-idarî sisteminden istifade edildiği tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar kelimeler: İslam tarihi, Bizans, cünd, ecnâd, Şam, toprak sistemi. * TDV İslam Araştırmaları Merkezi Araştırma Yetiştirme Projesi (AYP) kapsamında bu ma- kalenin bütün yazım sürecini titizlikle takip eden Doç.Dr. Berat Açıl’a, makaleyi okuyarak katkıda bulunan Prof.Dr. -
Some Notes on the Bema in the East and West Syrian Traditions
VII Some Notes on the Bema etc. 327 I,. Bouyer even goes so far as to claim that what is now generally accepted as the " Syrian arrangement " was formerly that of the ~~zantikerite as well ('). Because of the importance of this quesfion for the history of worship, it might be profitable to re- view the archeological and liturgical evidence. Some Notes on the Bema The most common solution to the problem of church anange- ment in both East and West was to place the seats for the clergy in the East and West Syrian Traditions in an apse at one end - usually the east - of the church. Before the clergy, at the beginning of the nave (or in the transept, or in the apse itself, depending on the architecture of the church) stood the altar. Beyond, further into the nave, stood the ambon Since the publication of H. C. Butler's Early Chwches of or ambons for the psalmody and readings. The congregation Syria (Princeton, 1929). archeologists and liturgiologists have occupied, it seems, not so much the central nave as today, but shown considerable interest in certain peculiarities in the liturgical the side naves, thus leaving the center of the church free for pro- disposition of a number of ancient churches in North Syria ('). cessions and other comings and goings of the ministers demanded by the various rites ('). (1) A partial list of recent works dealing with this problem would But modern archeological discoveries have shown that two include: H. C. BUTLER, Early Churches of Syria, Princeton. 1929,and Syria, areas of early Christianity followed a plan of their own: North Publications of the Princeton University Archeological Expedition to Syria Africa, and parts of Northern Syria and Mesopotamia. -
Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: a Study of Political Relations During Civil War
Durham E-Theses Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: A Study of Political Relations During Civil War VAN-WIJLICK, HENDRIKUS,ANTONIUS,MARGAR How to cite: VAN-WIJLICK, HENDRIKUS,ANTONIUS,MARGAR (2013) Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: A Study of Political Relations During Civil War , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9387/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ROME AND NEAR EASTERN KINGDOMS AND PRINCIPALITIES, 44-31 BC A study of political relations during civil war Hendrikus Antonius Margaretha VAN WIJLICK Abstract This thesis presents a critical analysis of the political relations between Rome on the one hand and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities on the other hand during the age of civil war from 44 until 31 BC. -
The Maronites Cistercian Studies Series: Number Two Hundred Forty-Three
The Maronites CISTERCIAN STUDIES SERIES: NUMBER TWO HUNDRED FORTY-THREE The Maronites The Origins of an Antiochene Church A Historical and Geographical Study of the Fifth to Seventh Centuries Abbot Paul Naaman Translated by The Department of Interpretation and Translation (DIT), Holy Spirit University Kaslik, Lebanon 2009 Cistercian Publications www.cistercianpublications.org LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org Maps adapted from G. Tchalenko, Villages antiques de la syrie du Nord (1953), T. II Pl. XXIII, Pl. XXIV, Pl. XXV. Used with permission. A Cistercian Publications title published by Liturgical Press Cistercian Publications Editorial Offices Abbey of Gethsemani 3642 Monks Road Trappist, Kentucky 40051 www.cistercianpublications.org © 2011 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, microfiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or by any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, PO Box 7500, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Naaman, Paul, 1932– The Maronites : the origins of an Antiochene church : a historical and geographical study of the fifth to seventh centuries / Paul Naaman ; translated by the Department of Interpretation and Translation (DIT), Holy Spirit University, Kaslik, Lebanon. p. cm. — (Cistercian studies series ; no. 243) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-87907-243-8 (pbk.) — ISBN 978-0-87907-794-5 (e-book) 1. -
Timeline1800 18001600
TIMELINE1800 18001600 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 8000BCE Sharpened stone heads used as axes, spears and arrows. 7000BCE Walls in Jericho built. 6100BCE North Atlantic Ocean – Tsunami. 6000BCE Dry farming developed in Mesopotamian hills. - 4000BCE Tigris-Euphrates planes colonized. - 3000BCE Farming communities spread from south-east to northwest Europe. 5000BCE 4000BCE 3900BCE 3800BCE 3760BCE Dynastic conflicts in Upper and Lower Egypt. The first metal tools commonly used in agriculture (rakes, digging blades and ploughs) used as weapons by slaves and peasant ‘infantry’ – first mass usage of expendable foot soldiers. 3700BCE 3600BCE © PastSearch2012 - T i m e l i n e Page 1 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 3500BCE King Menes the Fighter is victorious in Nile conflicts, establishes ruling dynasties. Blast furnace used for smelting bronze used in Bohemia. Sumerian civilization developed in south-east of Tigris-Euphrates river area, Akkadian civilization developed in north-west area – continual warfare. 3400BCE 3300BCE 3200BCE 3100BCE 3000BCE Bronze Age begins in Greece and China. Egyptian military civilization developed. Composite re-curved bows being used. In Mesopotamia, helmets made of copper-arsenic bronze with padded linings. Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, first to use iron for weapons. Sage Kings in China refine use of bamboo weaponry. 2900BCE 2800BCE Sumer city-states unite for first time. 2700BCE Palestine invaded and occupied by Egyptian infantry and cavalry after Palestinian attacks on trade caravans in Sinai. 2600BCE 2500BCE Harrapan civilization developed in Indian valley. Copper, used for mace heads, found in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Sumerians make helmets, spearheads and axe blades from bronze. -
The Sabbath and Jubilee Cycle to Document Antony’S Syrian Wars, Explaining How He Won Victories in Cyrrhestica and Other Regions in Syria
Chapter XVII The Chronology of Herod Part II of the Sabbath Year of 36/35 B.C.E. he evidence is conclusive. The year that Herod besieged and conquered TJerusalem was not a sabbath year, but the following year was. The only response left to those advocating systems “B” and “D” is to claim that Herod’s siege of Jerusalem actually took place in the year 38/37 B.C.E. This claim is not without some construing of the evidence. It is assumed by many that the Roman historian Cassius Dio dates the fall of Jerusalem to the consulship of Claudius and Norbanus, i.e. 38 B.C.E.1 Based upon this date several historians have rejected the testimony of Josephus and have dated the conquest of Jerusalem by Herod to the latter part of the year 38/37 B.C.E.2 It is crucial to our study, therefore, to establish beyond any doubt the chronology of Herod. Dio’s Contribution Our first consideration is the assumed dating of the fall of Jerusalem by Dio,3 which is commonly held to be in the consul year of Claudius and Norbanus (Jan. 1, 38 until Jan. 1, 37 B.C.E., late Roman reckoning). A close examination of Dio’s history reveals that Dio does not say this at all and his words are taken entirely out of context. The section of Dio’s Roman history which mentions the siege against Jerusalem is more precisely concerned with the wars of Augustus (Octavian) Caesar and Mark Antony in the divided empire of Rome. -
In the Writings of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Theodoret of Cyrus
2 Theōria in Theodore’s and Theodoret’s Commentaries This chapter provides analysis of primary source material in the writings of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Theodoret of Cyrus in order to illustrate and develop a definition of Antiochene —or at least theōria as understood by Theodore and Theodoret. Primary sources theōria for this research include manuscripts of Theodore’s and Theodoret’s exegetical works found in the TLG database1 and in J. P. Migne’s (PG).2 These are supplemented with recent Patrologia Graeca translations such as those in the Fathers of the Church (FC) multivolume series and catenae such as the Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture (ACCS).3 Despite the presence of significant research on Antiochene exegesis, there remains a relative dearth of serious study on Antiochene in the primary sources of Theodore and theōria Theodoret. My study builds on the foundation of Bradley Nassif’s 33 ANTIOCHENE THEŌRIA IN THEODORE AND THEODORET dissertation, which, among other concerns, addresses primarily theōria in the writings of John Chrysostom.4 In this chapter I aim to help fill the first of Nassif’s five noted lacunae for research on Antiochene —namely, to review other individual Antiochene writings and theōria their use of the term .5 Regarding such analysis, the Catholic theōria patristic scholar Bertrand de Margerie writes: The complexity of the material available shows that we still undoubtedly await the definitive work that will give us an exact understanding of the meaning of Antiochian , or, better still, of the different meanings theoria of the term found in the authors of the School and even within the same author.6 The reader will have to decide if the material in this chapter provides such an exacting definition of from the writings of Theodore theōria and Theodoret. -
Roman Governors of Syria in Late Antiquity: Problems and Perspectives of Prosopographic Research1 Pawel FILIPCZAK University of Lodz1
Roman Governors of Syria in Late Antiquity: Problems and Perspectives of Prosopographic Research1 Pawel FILIPCZAK University of Lodz1 Aziz al-Azmeh claims that the origins of Islam are ultimately traceable to the profound evolution that occurred in the eastern part of the Mediterranean and consisted in the adoption of Greek elements into Roman civilisation. One of these, characteristic of the Hellenistic period, was the deification of the ruler: in accordance with this idea, the Romans came to regard their emperors as the worldly emanations of the divine. From the fourth century AD, with the development of the Christian theory of power, the emperor acted as both the head and guardian of the Church, while the monotheistic Christian religion accommodated the imperial and centralist needs of the state. It has been a long-established view among scholars, mentioned also by al-Azmeh, that Galerius, Diocletian and Constantine “instituted something like Caliphate”2. Even if evidently exaggerated (and captivating), both in terms of facts and chronology, the above statement accurately captures general parallelisms between the Roman empire of late antiquity and the Umayyad state with regard to the symbiotic relationship of religion and state. Nevertheless, we should not underestimate the distance between theory and practice in this respect: it could have been (and often was) remarkably significant. Even the most peremptory of rulers had to depend on people executing his orders; likewise, even the best thought- out idea depended on people as regards its implementation. The people dealing with these “mundane” matters were the officials: they embodied the Romanitas and represented it in the provinces, including, of course, (1) This article has been written under the research project financed by the National Science Center (Poland). -
The Beersheba Edict and Travel in Late Antique Palestine M.A. Major
The Beersheba Edict and Travel in Late Antique Palestine M.A. Major Research Paper BY DANIEL SLOAN BAH, Queen’s University, 2010 Department of Classics Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada 12 April 2017 Abstract Ever since its first edition and commentary in 1921, the Beersheba Edict has been regarded as a collection of four inscriptions. It continues to be debated amongst scholars, such as Denis Feissel, because it records a collection of yearly sums from settlements across all three Palaestinae in the sixth century. As the Beersheba Edict does not specify a reason for the annual collection of solidi from these settlements, scholars have put forth numerous hypotheses in order to explain them. This paper does not aim to propose a new hypothesis, nor does it seek to disprove the latest interpretation of the Edict by Leah Di Segni. This paper, instead, prefers to work with the hypothesis of Di Segni by investigating the evidence for hospitality services and general travel along the roman roads connecting settlements recorded in the Beersheba Edict. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Tax Edict or Imperial Rescript? ............................................................................................2 1.2. The Dux, Provincial Governor and Vicars as Taxing Authorities and the Decline of Town Councils .........................................................................................................................................3 -
Ancient Syria: a Three Thousand Year History
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 11/20/2013, SPi ANCIENT SYRIA OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 11/20/2013, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 11/20/2013, SPi ANCIENT SYRIA a three thousand year history TREVOR BRYCE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 11/20/2013, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox2 6dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Trevor Bryce 2014 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2014 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2013942192 ISBN 978–0–19–964667–8 Printed in Italy by L.E.G.O. -
Administration and Jurisdiction in Cyprus M the 6Th Century AD
Administration and Jurisdiction in Cyprus m the 6th Century AD The later Roman Empire, beginning with the reign of the emperor Diocletian, is universally known as the Dominate. This word Dominate - expresses the legitimation of the power of the Emperor. From now on Diocletian and his successors claim to be domini, owners or rather lords of the Roman Empire and its inhabitants, whereas the subjects are related to the Emperor by the chain of servitudo, slavery or rather serfdom. The constitutional framework which gave absolute power to the Roman Emperor was constructed largely by Diocletian. True to Roman type, he did not abolish anything; he kept intact the fiction of the republic and its functions. The consuls, praetors, quaestors were still there, but their real task was reduced to almost nothing. The Senate too still functioned, although more against than on behalf of the Emperor and was for that reason stripped of its real power. In the chaos of the time of the soldier-emperors the only institution that functioned normally was the army. The military ranks were accessible to everyone who demonstrated military courage and leadership and military promotion was not restricted by the narrow rules of background and tradition that came to regulate the usual cursus honorum. Consequently civil power came to be wielded by high ranking army officers and in due course the military offices exercised civil authority. The most powerful civil minister of the later Roman Empire, for example, would be the praetorian prefect, who played an often dangerous part in the history of the Principate as head of the imperial guard. -
Bridging the Hellespont: the Successor Lysimachus - a Study
BRIDGING THE HELLESPONT: THE SUCCESSOR LYSIMACHUS - A STUDY IN EARLY HELLENISTIC KINGSHIP Helen Sarah Lund PhD University College, London ProQuest Number: 10610063 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10610063 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Literary evidence on Lysimachus reveals a series of images which may say more about contemporary or later views on kingship than about the actual man, given the intrusion of bias, conventional motifs and propaganda. Thrace was Lysimachus* legacy from Alexander's empire; though problems posed by its formidable tribes and limited resources excluded him from the Successors' wars for nearly ten years, its position, linking Europe and Asia, afforded him some influence, Lysimachus failed to conquer "all of Thrace", but his settlements there achieved enough stability to allow him thoughts of rule across the Hellespont, in Asia Minor, More ambitious and less cautious than is often thought, Lysimachus' acquisition of empire in Asia Minor, Macedon and Greece from c.315 BC to 284 BC reflects considerable military and diplomatic skills, deployed primarily when self-interest demanded rather than reflecting obligations as a permanent member of an "anti-Antigonid team".