Iran's Strategy of Coercion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iran's Strategy of Coercion Prisoners as bargaining chips: Iran’s strategy of coercion 18 January 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 - 4 Recent Iran Protests 5 - 8 Prisoners as Political Pawns 9 - 11 Incarcerated European Dual-Nationals 12 - 18 Incarcerated American Dual-Nationals 19 - 23 Freedom of Association and Expression 24 - 31 Journalists in Jail: “Western Infiltration Network” 31 - 34 2 Executive Summary: The regime in Tehran continues to show an utter disregard for the civil and political rights of its citizens. While the easing of sanctions from the west was believed to represent a pre-cursor for greater adherence by Tehran to international and domestic legal standards following the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015, in reality the regime continues its indiscriminate campaign of repression. The case studies included in the report demonstrate that despite public pronouncements to the contrary, the regime possesses a blatant disregard for any citizens that seek to exercise their civil rights by daring to speak against their policies. The 30 dual-nationals currently detained in Iran marks a sharp increase in political detainees since 2015. Prior to this, the numbers of dual-citizens detained at any given time remained in single figures. In addition to 7 Iranian-American dual nationals, 19 out of the 30 detainees have European citizenships this represents a dangerous new trend since most of the previous detainees were of Iranian-American descent. The case of Nazanin-Zaghari Ratclie a British-Iranian citizen imprisoned on espionage charges, serves as potent reminder of the threat now posed by the Iranian regime to Europeans visiting the country. Boris Johnson, UK Foreign Secretary concluded a two-day visit to the Islamic Republic on the 10 December 2017 to advocate on her behalf, but so far has been unable to secure her release. IOHR conducted an interview with Dr Homa Hoodfar a Canadian-Iranian socio-cultural anthropolo- gist and a professor of anthropology at Concordia University in Montreal who was arrested in Febru- ary 2016 during a visit to her family in Iran. She spent 112 days imprisoned in Evin prison and briefly shared a prison cell with Nazanin. Dr Hoodfar argued that the true reasons behind Nazanin’s visit to Iran are irrelevant with regards to the accusations levelled against her by the judicial authorities: “They create a narrative that they repeat to themselves so much they believe it.” 3 In a recurring theme throughout all the cases included in this report, sources close to the detainees have repeatedly argued that none of the individuals arrested were involved in espionage activities of any kind and were arrested because of their second citizenship. Their dual nationality gives them value and the Iranian authorities have been using them as bargaining chips in Tehran’s on-going negotiations with the west. Furthermore, the Iranian regime has also been accused of clamping down on its citizens’ rights to freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and religious belief. According to the Iran Prison Atlas compiled by United For Iran a non-profit group based in the US, in 2017 there are currently 138 bloggers, 101 pro-democracy activists, 50 Journalists, 75 civic activists and 49 Human rights defenders incarcerated in various prisons across the country.¹ Critics of the regime are often detained, sentenced to long stretches in prison after undergoing grossly unfair trials before Revolutionary Courts. While in prison, many detainees are forced to endure physical torture, flogging and other cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Ms. Asma Jehangir, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Iran noted in the Report for 2017, that 4,332 complaints alleging human rights violations had been submitted in the past 4 years which included torture and ill-treatment and that “only a small percentage” warranted action.² Despite an electoral campaign that saw Mr. Rouhani promise to ease up on the detainment of journalists and bloggers, Iran remains one the world’s worst jailers of journalists. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, at least 7 professional journalists are currently behind bars in the 2017 census.³ Reporters Without Borders ranks Iran as 169 out of 180 countries in its latest World Press Freedom Index.⁴ Iranian authorities frequently detain and prosecute journalists on vaguely defined national security charges while granting limited, or no access, to legal defence during the investigative phase of their detention. Among those unjustly detained are four Iranian journalists arrested in 2015: Isa Saharkhiz, Ehsan Manzandarani, Davoud Asadi and Saman Safarzaei all of whom were accused of being part of a “western infiltration network” ostensibly due to their collabo- ration with international media organisations. 4 https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2016 4 Recent Protests in Iran Anger amongst the wider population over economic stagnation and widespread corruption within the clerical and security hierarchies governing the Islamic Republic have become the most powerful challenge to the Iranian government's authority since mass demonstrations in 2009. The motive for the current protests appears to stem from frustration over the slow pace of economic reforms. Moreover, many slogans amongst the protestors are overtly political, some directly attacking the theocratic nature of Iran’s clerical regime and demanding greater social freedoms. Unlike previous movements, the current protests did not begin amongst the cosmopolitan elite in Iranian urban centres such as Tehran. Instead the current demonstrations were sparked by a rally against rising prices of food in Mashhad, Iran’s second largest city and the site of its most holy shrine, a place traditionally seen as an electoral bastion for clerical hardliners before the protests spread to many cities and towns across the country. Despite President Rouhani’s campaign promises, youth employment remained at 28.8% last year. Similarly, while the nuclear accord was successful in reducing sanctions, these measures were unable to provide the economic benefits that many within the country had expected. Instead, a 50% increase in the price of fuel was announced, while the prices of basic food such as egg and poultry have risen recently by around 40%.⁵ 5 http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/03/asia/iran-protests-government-intl/index.html 5 The gravity of the challenge posed by these protests to the Iranian leadership is perhaps best summarised by Abbas Milani, the Director of Iranian Studies at Stanford University who argues: “The regime is strategically weak because it faces daunting challenges- from oil price changes and water shortages to a disgruntled, Internet-savvy, youthful population, led by increasingly assertive women, hampered by chronic double-digit inflation and unemployment, and angered by corruption, cronyism and the squandering of massive sums in proxy wars, particularly in Syria.”⁶ Student protestors in Tehran University Source: Associated Press Another factor that distinguishes the current protestors is the heavy involvement of the Iranian youth in the demonstrations. The increased involvement of the youth was highlighted in a statement by Deputy Interior Minister Hossein Zolfaghari in which he confirmed that 90% of the individuals arrested by the government during the protests are under 25. This widespread disenchantment felt amongst Iranian youth is not a surprise. According to the International Labour Organisation (ILO) almost 26.7% of 15-24-year olds are unemployed. This sentiment is re-iterated by Amir Ahmadi Arian, a prominent Iranian novelist and government critic who wrote: 6 https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/01/03/575276110/dont-oversimplify-the-protests-in-iran 6 “Iran has lived through multiple convulsions. The government has mastered the art of survival through crises. They may well survive this round as well, but something has fundamentally changed: The unquestioning support of the rural people they relied on against the discontent of the metropolitan elite is no more. Now everyone is unhappy.”⁹ Student protestors in Tehran University Source: Associated Press According to Iran Wire, who have analysed various new reports and public pronouncements close to 21 people have been killed and more than 1000 people have been arrested during the nation-wide protests since the beginning of the protests on 28 December, 2017.¹⁰ Policing Cyber Space In today’s informational age, social media and messaging apps are increasingly playing a crucial role in anti-government demonstrations across the globe, particularly as a means of both organising and delivering messages to participants. Consequently, restricting access to such technology has become as important to repressive government crackdowns as the physical presence of security services. This trend is exemplified by the current demonstrations in Iran where social media applications have been utilised by protestors to galvanise and organise the tens of thousands participating in the protests. As a result, alongside mass arrests of protestors, authorities have responded by banning Telegram, a messaging app that is widely used in Iran with 40-46 million users in the country,Which has been blocked.¹¹ Holly Dagres, a Middle East analyst and curator of the The Iranist newsletter spoke on the significance of this move by the government saying: 7 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-rallies/irans-leader-blames-enemies-for-deadly-unrest-u-s-calls-that-nonsense-idUSKBN1ER1NA
Recommended publications
  • As Israel's Political Parties Fight for Role of Kingmaker, Religious
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 8 1 Volume 2 1 , Number 1 2 Parshas Vayikra March 20 , 20 2 1 As Israel’s Political Parties Fight for Role of Kingmaker, Religious - Secular Divide Comes to the Fore By Haviv Rettig Gur timesofisrael.com March 15, 2021 Two very different parties have found in each other lawmakers and some Haredi party activists sharing p hotos the perfect enemies. of emaciated bodies being carried on wheelbarrows during Eight days to election day, the race between the pro - the Holocaust. and anti - Netanyahu camps is close. So close, in fact, that The video clip of that line went viral on Hebrew - neither side can hope to piece together an effective language social media. Few noticed the exchange that government. followed, in which Liberman went on to explain If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu manages to something important about his campaign strategy — he eke out a slim majority, it will likely b e so slim that he will needs to boost support by driving secular voters to the find himself forced to cater to the whims of the most polls. right - wing lawmakers on the ballot. Netanyahu’s Challenged again by Asayag that he cannot push both opponents, meanwhile, theoretically led by Yair Lapid of Netanyahu and the Haredi parties out of government Yesh Atid, may well be too divided and diverse to produce simultaneously and will end up “hugging [Shas leader a manageable coa lition.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian-American Baquer Namazi Temporarily Released from Iranian Jail Over Health Concerns
    January 28, 2018 Iranian-American Baquer Namazi temporarily released from Iranian jail over health concerns By Katherine Lam An 81-year-old Iranian-American dual national was temporarily released from prison on Sunday over health concerns after the U.S. and Iran conducted backchannel discussions about releasing American prisoners, according to a State Department official. Baquer Namazi, who is being detained in Iran with his son Siamek, was released from Tehran’s Evin prison for four days, but cannot leave the country during the leave. Both Namazis are serving 10-year prison sentences after closed-door trials. “We welcome the release of Baquer Namazi given his deteriorating health, but we note that his release is only temporary. We call for the immediate and full release of the Namazi family, including his son Siamek, as well as other Americans unjustly held by the Iranian government,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert tweeted. Namazi’s attorneys said the 81-year-old is in poor health and needs medical treatment. Baquer previously underwent surgery in prison to have a pacemaker installed. The U.S. has been in backchannel discussions with Iran to release the Namazis and other American citizens, Steve Goldstein, the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, told Fox News. He added that Iran, “to be truly humanitarian,” must release these American prisoners immediately. Baquer was arrested in February 2016 after his son was taken into custody in October the year before while visiting family. Siamak’s arrest also occurred three months after the Iran nuclear deal was signed. Baquer’s wife, Effie Namazi, shared the news on Facebook at the time, saying her husband and son were “in prison for no reason.” “I am extremely concerned and worried sick for Baquer’s health since he is an 80-year-old man and has a serious heart and other conditions which requires him to take special heart and other medicine,” Effie Namazi wrote in the post.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/WGAD/2017/49 Advance Edited Version
    A/HRC/WGAD/2017/49 Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 22 September 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, 21-25 August 2017 Opinion No. 49/2017 concerning Siamak Namazi and Mohammed Baquer Namazi (Islamic Republic of Iran) 1. The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention was established in resolution 1991/42 of the Commission on Human Rights, which extended and clarified the Working Group’s mandate in its resolution 1997/50. Pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/251 and Human Rights Council decision 1/102, the Council assumed the mandate of the Commission. The mandate of the Working Group was most recently extended for a three- year period in Council resolution 33/30 of 30 September 2016. 2. In accordance with its methods of work (A/HRC/33/66), on 23 May 2017 the Working Group transmitted to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran a communication concerning Siamak Namazi and Mohammed Baquer Namazi. The Government has not replied to the communication. The State is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 3. The Working Group regards deprivation of liberty as arbitrary in the following cases: (a) When it is clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty (as when a person is kept in detention after the completion of his or her sentence or despite an amnesty law applicable to him or her) (category I); (b) When the deprivation of liberty
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Concerning the Islamic Republic of Iran JOINT SUBMISSION MADE by the FAMILY MEMBERS of ARBITRARILY DETAINED FOREIGN and DUAL NATIONALS
    Universal Periodic Review: Submission concerning the Islamic Republic of Iran JOINT SUBMISSION MADE BY THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF ARBITRARILY DETAINED FOREIGN AND DUAL NATIONALS MARCH 2019 SUBMITTED BY Centre for Supporters of Human Rights Iran Human Rights Documentation Center [email protected] 129 Church Street, Suite 423 http://en.cshr.org.uk/ New Haven, Connecticut; 06510 U.S.A Tel: 1 (203) 745 4247 E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://www.iranhrdc.org The Center for Supporters of Human Rights is a non- The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center governmental organisation established in the UK in 2013. Dr. is an independent non-profit organization that Shirin Ebadi, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, is the founder and was founded in 2004 by human rights scholars the chair of the Centre. The objectives of the Centre are: and lawyers. The mission of the Center is to: Advancement of education and increased awareness of Establish a comprehensive and objective human rights in Middle East, in particular in Iran historical record of the human rights Reporting on the condition of human rights, in particular situation in Iran, and on the basis of this on the situation of human rights in Iran record, establish responsibility for patterns of Holding training sessions on human rights and the status human rights abuses; and precedents of the International Court of Justice, either Make the record available in an archive that through classes and in person or via internet is accessible to the public for research and Holding seminars and meetings of experts to formulate a educational purposes; strategy to advance human rights, especially in Iran; Promote accountability, respect for human Focusing on improvement of women’s rights in Muslim rights and the rule of law in Iran; and countries, especially in Iran Encourage an informed dialogue on the Supporting roles of women in promoting democracy in the human rights situation in Iran among world especially in Iran; scholars and the general public in Iran and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coming Iran Nuclear Talks Openings and Obstacles
    The Coming Iran Nuclear Talks Openings and Obstacles DENNIS ROSS January 2021 he Middle East will not be a priority in the Biden administration’s approach to foreign policy. But the T Iranian nuclear program will require a response.* With the Iranian parliament having adopted legislation mandating uranium enrichment to 20 percent and suspension of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections if sanctions are not lifted by February 2020 in response to the targeted killing of Iranian scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh— and with Iran now having accumulated twelve times the low-enriched uranium permitted under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action—the administration will have to deal with the Iranian challenge.1 To be sure, the nuclear program and its potential to make Iran a nuclear weapons state are not the only challenges the Islamic Republic poses: the regime’s ballistic missile program and destabilizing and aggressive behavior in the region threaten conflicts that can escalate both vertically and horizontally. But it is the nuclear program that is most pressing. *The author would like to thank a number of his Washington Institute colleagues—Katherine Bauer, Patrick Clawson, Michael Eisenstadt, Barbara Leaf, Matthew Levitt, David Makovsky, David Pollock, Robert Satloff, and Michael Singh—for the helpful comments they provided as he prepared this paper. He also wants to give special thanks to several people outside the Institute—Robert Einhorn, Richard Nephew, David Petraeus, Norman Roule, and Karim Sadjadpour—for the thoughtful comments
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Support for Terrorism
    OUTLAW REGIME: A CHRONICLE OF IRAN’S DESTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES Iran Action Group U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE “America will not be held hostage to nuclear blackmail.” PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, MAY 2018 In recognition of the increasing menace posed by the Iranian regime, President Trump announced a new strategy to address the full range of the regime’s destructive actions. OUTLAW REGIME: A CHRONICLE OF IRAN’S DESTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES A Letter From Executive Chapter One: 4 Secretary of State 6 Summary 8 Iran’s Support Michael R. Pompeo for Terrorism 18 Chapter Two: 22 Chapter Three: 26 Chapter Four: Iran’s Missile Illicit Financial Iran’s Threat to Program Activities in Iran Maritime Security Chapter Five: Chapter Six: Chapter Seven: 30 Iran’s Threat to 34 Human Rights 40 Environmental Cybersecurity Abuses in Iran Exploitation AP PHOTO OUTLAW REGIME: A CHRONICLE OF IRAN’S DESTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES | 3 A LETTER FROM U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE MICHAEL R. POMPEO I am pleased to release the State Department’s new report detailing the scope of the Iranian regime’s destructive behavior at home and abroad on the eve of the Islamic Revolution’s 40th anniversary. On May 8, 2018, President Donald J. Trump announced his decision to cease U.S. participation in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly referred to as the Iran deal. The Iran deal was proving to be a failed strategic bet that fell short of protecting the American people or our allies from the potential of an Iranian nuclear weapon. The futility of entrusting our long term security to an agreement that will quickly expire was underscored by the recent bombshell that Iran had secretly preserved its past nuclear weapons research after the implementation of the JCPOA.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Iran Retaliate Against U.S. Sanctions? | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Will Iran Retaliate Against U.S. Sanctions? by Omer Carmi Aug 3, 2017 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Omer Carmi Omer Carmi was a 2017 military fellow at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony IRGC hardliners have pushed for an aggressive response to U.S. measures, but they will have to convince the Supreme Leader that escalation does not pose too great a risk. esterday President Donald Trump signed into law the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Y Act, which includes actions against Iran's ballistic missile program and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) and its affiliated entities. Coming at a time of political ferment in Iran, the new U.S. legislation provides an opportunity for hardliners and moderates to demonstrate their political bona fides as they calibrate their response. In recent weeks, senior IRGC commanders have threatened that a new round of U.S. sanctions would trigger a harsh response against American interests in the region. Thus, the key question before U.S. national security officials is whether an Iranian group will feel forced to respond to the sanctions by attacking U.S. forces directly or indirectly, further escalating tensions between the two countries. This is not the first time that the United States has sanctioned Iran, of course. In 2011-12 the United States and the European Union increased pressure on Iran by imposing new sanctions on oil exports. Iran responded with naval drills, missile tests, and threats to close the Strait of Hormuz. Mohammad Reza Rahimi, then-Iranian Vice President, declared that if sanctions were imposed, "even one drop of oil cannot flow from the strait of Hormuz." The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Beyond the Stalemate in US-Iranian Relations, Volume II
    Thinking Beyond the Stalemate in U.S.-Iranian Relations Volume II – Issues and Analysis Lee H. Hamilton James Schlesinger Brent Scowcroft Co-Chairs Roscoe Suddarth Principal Policy Advisor Elaine L. Morton Author-Rapporteur C. Richard Nelson Project Director Occasional Paper July 2001 The Atlantic Council is a nonpartisan network of leaders who are convinced of the critical importance of effective U.S. foreign policy and the cohesion of U.S. international relationships. The Council promotes constructive U.S. leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the central role of the Atlantic community in the contemporary world situation. To this end, the Council: • stimulates dialogue and discussion about critical international policy issues, with the intention of enriching public debate and promoting consensus in the administration, the Congress, the corporate and nonprofit sectors and the media in the United States, and among leaders in Europe, Asia and the Americas; • conducts educational and other programs for successor generations of U.S. leaders who will value U.S. international engagement and have the formation necessary to develop effective policies. Through its diverse networks, the Council builds broad constituencies to support constructive U.S. international leadership and policies. By focusing on critical issues, choices can be illuminated, priorities established, and possibilities for consensus explored. Important contributions by the Council include: • identifying major issues facing the future of the Atlantic Alliance, transatlantic economic relations, and the integration into European structures of the countries of central and eastern Europe, including Russia; • building consensus on U.S. policy towards Russia, China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan; • balancing growing energy needs and environmental protection in Asia; • drafting roadmaps for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Iran's Foreign Relations Semira N
    Timeline of Iran's Foreign Relations Semira N. Nikou 1979 Feb. 12 – Syria was the first Arab country to recognize the revolutionary regime when President Hafez al Assad sent a telegram of congratulations to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The revolution transformed relations between Iran and Syria, which had often been hostile under the shah. Feb. 14 – Students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, but were evicted by the deputy foreign minister and Iranian security forces. Feb. 18 – Iran cut diplomatic relations with Israel. Oct. 22 – The shah entered the United States for medical treatment. Iran demanded the shah’s return to Tehran. Nov. 4 – Students belonging to the Students Following the Imam’s Line seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The hostage crisis lasted 444 days. On Nov. 12, Washington cut off oil imports from Iran. On Nov. 14, President Carter issued Executive Order 12170 ordering a freeze on an estimated $6 billion of Iranian assets and official bank deposits in the United States. March – Iran severed formal diplomatic ties with Egypt after it signed a peace deal with Israel. Three decades later, Egypt was still the only Arab country that did not have an embassy in Tehran. 1980 April 7 – The United States cut off diplomatic relations with Iran. April 25 – The United States attempted a rescue mission of the American hostages during Operation Eagle Claw. The mission failed due to a sandstorm and eight American servicemen were killed. Ayatollah Khomeini credited the failure to divine intervention. Sept. 22 – Iraq invaded Iran in a dispute over the Shatt al-Arab waterway.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Aggression & Bad Actions Since the JCPOA
    Iranian Aggression & Bad Actions Since the JCPOA • An Iranian diplomat and three others, Belgian’s of Iranian descent, were arrested for plotting a bomb attack on a rally held by an exiled Iranian opposition group in France. Germany charged the diplomat – a “third counselor” based in Vienna, Austria – with “activity as a foreign agent and conspiracy to commit murder.” A senior U.S. State Department official has confirmed that the Iranian regime was behind this attempted bombing. The Belgian authorities found 500 grams of the powerful homemade explosive TATP and an ignition mechanism hidden in a toiletry bag in a car. o Among those who attended the rally were Americans including former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former FBI Director Louis Freeh, former Homeland Security Advisor Frances Townsend and former U.S. Army chief of staff Gen. George Casey. Other prominent attendees were the former Canadian prime minister, Stephen Harper, and former French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner. o There were about 25,000 people in attendance at the rally. • Iran threatened the world’s oil supply. After supposed “moderate” Iranian President Rouhani hinted at it, not one, but two, prominent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) leaders explicitly threatened the oil supply. "If they want to stop Iranian oil exports, we will not allow any oil shipment to pass through the Strait of Hormuz," IRGC commander Ismail Kowsari said. And Qasem Soleimani, the IRGC Quds force commander wrote in a letter to Rouhani that was made public that the IRGC "is ready to implement a policy that hinders regional oil exports if the United States bans Iranian oil sales." • Iran was aggressive in the Persian Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctions and Human Rights: the Role of Sanctions in International Security, Peace Building and the Protection of Civilian’S Rights and Well-Being
    DOCTORAL THESIS SANCTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THE ROLE OF SANCTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, PEACE BUILDING AND THE PROTECTION OF CIVILIAN’S RIGHTS AND WELL-BEING. CASE STUDIES OF IRAN AND ZIMBABWE. STUDENT: CHIDIEBERE, C. OGBONNA SUPERVISORS: DR. JOSÉ ÁNGEL RUIZ JIMÉNEZ DR. SOFIA HERRERO RICO Castellón, 2016 Dedication To my parents: Nze, George and Lolo, Veronica Ogbonna And to my two brothers: Chukwunyere and Iheanyichukwu And my Love: Chigozie, R. Okeke i Epigraph i will not sit head bent in silence while children are fed sour bread and dull water i will not sit head bent in silence while people rant for the justice of death i will not sit head bent in silence while gossip destroys the souls of human beings i will not sit head bent in silence at any stage of my life and i will depart this world with words spitting from my lips like bullets …too many pass this way heads bent in silence (Alan Corkish, 2003) ii Acknowledgements It has been years of thorough commitment, thorough hard-work and unquantifiable experience. May I use this opportunity to say a big thank you to everybody that contributed in one way or the other to my success, sustenance and improvement over these years of intensive academic pursuit. Of special mention are my parents Nze, George and Lolo, Veronica Ogbonna. Also my appreciation goes to Gabriela Fernández, Barrister Uzoma Ogbonna, Mr. Kelvin Iroegbu, Chinedu Anyanwu, Magnus Umunnakwe and Mr. Lawrence Ubani. More so, it is imperative to acknowledge my past teachers and academic counsellors, who set the stage running through meticulous advice, guidance, inspiration and constructive criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2017
    United Nations A/72/322 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Item 73 (c) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran Note by the Secretary-General** The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 34/23. * A/72/150. ** The present report was submitted after the deadline as a result of consultations with the Islamic Republic of Iran. 17-13925 (E) 230817 *1713925* A/72/322 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran Summary During its thirty-third session, the Human Rights Council appointed Asma Jahangir as Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The present report outlines the activities carried out by the Special Rapporteur since the issuance of her first report to the Council (A/HRC/34/65), examines ongoing issues and presents some of the most recent and pressing developments in the area of human rights in the country. Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................... 3 II. Charter on Citizens’ Rights ....................................................... 4 III. Civil and political rights ......................................................... 4 A. Right to take part in the conduct of public affairs ................................ 4 B. Rights to freedom of expression, opinion, information and the press ................. 6 C.
    [Show full text]