DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2020 COMMITTED TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING SURFACE SAFETY. Alaska Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 2019-2020 RUNWAY SAFETY COUNCIL (RSC) #45 www.faa.gov Executive Summary The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) top data, development of new safety metrics, and priority is maintaining safety in the National leveraged organizational capabilities in support TABLE Airspace System (NAS). The goal for runway of meeting this goal. safety is to improve safety by decreasing the OF CONTENTS FAA Safety Management System (SMS) 4 number and severity of Runway Incursions (RI), In support of the NRSP, and in support of Runway Excursions (RE) and serious Surface Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Safety and Incidents. FAA’s 2018- 2020 National Runway Technical Training (AJI) FY2018 Business Plan, the Alaskan Region (AAL) has developed this Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) Methodology Safety Plan (NRSP) outlines the FAA’s strategy 6 to adapt its runway safety efforts through Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) to provide enhanced collection and integrated analysis of a roadmap with regional emphasis for FY2020. 7 FY20 RRSP Initiatives 8 Safety Assurance 10 Safety Risk Management (SRM) 12 Safety Policy 16 Safety Promotion 4 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 5 FAA Safety Management FY18-FY20 NRSP Objectives System (SMS) SAFETY FAA is employing and evolving a Safety The National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020 ASSURANCE Identify Operating Hazards Management System (SMS), which provides a aligns our strategic priorities with established Program Data formalized and proactive approach to system Safety Risk Management principles. The plan Remain the global leader in assuring Voluntary Safety Reporting safety in order to find, analyze and address defines how the FAA, airports, and industry runway safety enhancement initiatives Investigations risk in the NAS. The SMS is comprised of partners collaborate and use data-driven, risk- are effective in maintaining an Safety Risk Monitoring four main components, which combine to based decision-making to enhance the safety acceptable level of safety at U.S. create a systemic approach to managing and of the National Airspace System. airports with an air traffic control Data Analysis ensuring safety. These components are Safety tower. Partnership for Safety Assurance, Safety Risk Management, and This regional plan endeavors to align its Audits and Evaluations Safety Policy, Safety Promotion. Presently, activities with the principles and components the ATO and Airports Division utilize SMS as a of FAA’s current Safety Management System. systemic approach to managing the safety of AAL Regional Runway Safety Initiatives airport operations. are grouped according to the FAA’s Four SAFETY RISK The NRSP focuses on the development of the Pillars of SMS: Safety Assurance, Safety MANAGEMENT Analyze, Assess, Mitigate, interagency strategic processes to transition Risk Management, and Safety Policy, Safety and Accept Risk from event-based safety to risk-based safety Promotion. Implement Runway Safety Develop Monitoring Plan using multiple data sources and stakeholder Enhancement Initiatives that manage Safety Risk Management subject matter experts to assess current risk, or reduce the risk of airport operations. Documents predict future risk, and establish relevant metrics that measure the reduction in risk. SAFETY POLICY SMS Orders Establish and maintain policies and Safety Guidance procedures to ensure adequate resources are available to accomplish FAA/ATO Safety Orders the FAA’s near-term and strategic SMS Manual objectives. SAFETY PROMOTION Outreach and Education Relentlessly promote best practices, Products lessons learned, and actionable Lessons Learned information obtained from data Workshops analysis to our global runway safety stakeholders. Safety Communication 6 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 7 Regional Runway Safety Plan FY20 Regional The Following Initiatives (RRSP) Methodology Runway Safety Are Covered In This Plan: 1.1 Incorporation of Trend Information into RRSP In accordance with FAA ORDER 7050.1B, the AAL well as systemic problems to reduce surface risk at Plan Initiatives Runway Safety Governance Council (RGC) is chaired regional airports and elevate critical issues to the Support of NextGen Surface by the Regional Administrator and is composed of RGC. 1.2 the Regional Runway Safety Program Manager To assist with the implementation process of Safety Technologies this plan, the RRST has developed the initiatives (RRSPM) and executives or designees from FAA Directive Airports Division, Flight Standards Service and ATO noted below as its primary focus. The RRST will Runway Safety Program Order 7050.1B 2.1 RRST support of LRSAT/RSATs and RSAPs Operations. At the direction of the AAL Regional be working in concert with the appropriate field prescribes the FAA Runway Safety Program Administrator, other directors and managers have office manager within each respective LOB to (RSP). This directive establishes policy, been added to the AAL RGC and are identified on the implement the initiatives as outlined. AAL RRSP FY2018 Initiative: Support assigns responsibility, and delegates authority signature page. The council meets quarterly and is 2.2 Airports Division Runway Incursion for ensuring compliance with this order within. In addition to these priorities and currently responsible for ensuring that regional initiatives and identified initiatives, the RRST will monitor and Mitigation (RIM) Program actions are being accomplished in the appropriate elevate appropriate impromptu issues to the manner and timeframe. RGC. This is a living document and the RRST 3.1 Runway Safety – SMS Continuity In accordance with FAA Order 7050.1B, the AAL AAL Priority Airport will update issues as needed and keep the RGC apprised. Regional Runway Safety Team (RRST) is comprised and Airports of Interest 3.2 AAL Regional Commitments of Runway Safety staff and at least one designated The Regional Administrator as well as all Runway Safety efforts are an ongoing process; representative of Service Area Terminal Operations, the LOB represented on the RGC will attend therefore, trend assessment and monitoring plans Flight Service Station Pilot Outreach Service Area Technical Operations, and the Flight or have a representative at all Alaska Local must continue to be evaluated. All AAL towered Standards Service, and Airports regional divisions. Safety Meeting (Runway Safety and RSAT meetings. airport trends will be routinely monitored by the 4.1 These are the required members of the RRST, RRST. Based on the data, if the RRST evaluates Airborne) at non-towered airports with referred to in this plan as the RRST Core members. certain airports to be worthy of more focused AAL Priority Airport: a Flight Service Station on site RGC members will identify their Line of Business attention, appropriate monitoring plans and y Lake Hood Sea Plane Base (LHD) (LOB) expert representative(s) to serve on the RRST. mitigations will be developed and recommended by Other members of prominence have been invited the RRST. 4.2 Wrong Surface Events to join the RRST. Appendix A lists the members of AAL Airports of Interest: the RRST. The RRST members assist the RSPM in y Bethel (BET) All applicable lines of business have collaborated 4.3 FAAST General Aviation (GA) WINGS executing the Runway Safety Program. in the development of this plan, which will be y Fairbanks (FAI) updated annually by the RRST. Each plan will The RRST is tasked with identifying regional priorities have the concurrence of the RGC. 4.4 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and working through their executive representative AAL Priority Issues to ensure that issues are properly vetted through The following national issues have an impact their respective LOB for prior coordination before on locations within the region. More detail implementing action on behalf of the RRSP. The regarding these issues is contained in the RRST has aligned this plan with agency priorities, initiatives section: the Runway Safety Program (FAA Order 7050.1B) y Runway Confusion Events: and methodologies to include Safety Management Wrong Surface Events, AAL Systems (SMS). RRSP Initiative 4.2 The RRST functions as a working level team in support of the RGC. The RRST meets regularly throughout the year, usually monthly. The RSPM and LOB subject matter experts will brief the RRST Note: The RGC may elevate systemic issues as on current safety data, trends and issues and appropriate to their respective headquarters LOB solicit input from the other RRST members. The or to the National Gover-nance Council (NGC). RRST will identify and address specific issues as 8 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 9 Activity 1.1 - AAL RRSP FY2020 Initiative: Action Item: Incorporation of Trend Information into the 1.2a The RRST will continue to monitor 1. Safety Assurance RRSP the development of current and emerging RRST members will review and assess airport technologies, especially the implementation trend data. If any new trends emerge that the team of ASSC at ANC, and will report out to the AAL determines to merit extra monitoring, mitigation, RGC. and/or addition to this plan, then changes will be made to this document as required. Action Item: As of September 26, 2019, the schedule for Anchorage International 1.1a Continuous trend monitoring and assessment of the AAL towered airports.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 241/Monday, December 17, 2018
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules 64491 airspace. This regulation is within the Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 scope of that authority as it would 76177. Airspace, Incorporation by reference, establish Class E airspace extending Availability and Summary of Navigation (air). upward from 700 feet above the surface Documents for Incorporation by at Farington Field Airport, Auburn, NE, The Proposed Amendment Reference in support of standard instrument Accordingly, pursuant to the This document proposes to amend approach procedures for IFR operations authority delegated to me, the Federal FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace at the airport. Aviation Administration proposes to Designations and Reporting Points, amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Comments Invited dated August 13, 2018, and effective Interested parties are invited to September 15, 2018. FAA Order PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, participate in this proposed rulemaking 7400.11C is publicly available as listed B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR by submitting such written data, views, in the ADDRESSES section of this TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND or arguments, as they may desire. document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists REPORTING POINTS Comments that provide the factual basis Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, supporting the views and suggestions air traffic service routes, and reporting ■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR presented are particularly helpful in points. part 71 continues to read as follows: developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments The Proposal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • BID SCHEDULE Version-2 *Note: Bidders Need Not Respond to All Lots, but All Items Within the Lot(S) Submitted Must Be Priced
    State of Alaska ITB 2521S010 Highway & Airport Maintenance Sand for Various Locations in the Southcoast Region BID SCHEDULE Version-2 *Note: Bidders need not respond to all lots, but all items within the lot(s) submitted must be priced. Only lots submitted for the State’s consideration are required as a deliverable. SOUTHEAST DISTRICT Lot 1 - Haines Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 MP 25 Haines State Highway 2,275 Ton $ $ 2 Haines Maintenance Yard State Airport 1,750 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 1 Lot 2 - Hoonah Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Hoonah Airport Contractor Airport 420 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 2 Lot 3 - Juneau Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Juneau Maintenance Yard State Highway 2,000 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 3 Lot 4 - Ketchikan Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Ketchikan Maintenance Yard Contractor Highway 2,100 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 4 Lot 5 - Gustavus Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Gustavus Maintenance Yard Contractor Airport 420 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 5 Continued on next page 1 State of Alaska ITB 2521S010 Highway & Airport Maintenance Sand for Various Locations in the Southcoast Region Lot 6 - Hoonah Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Klawock Maintenance Yard Contractor Highway 5,600 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 6 Lot 7 - Petersburg Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Petersburg Scow Bay, 288 Contractor Highway 1,176 Ton $ $ Mitkoff Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Bethel, Alaska
    Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Bethel, Alaska By Joseph M. Dorava and Eppie V. Hogan U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 95-173 Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Anchorage, Alaska 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Open-File Reports Section Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 Box25286, MS 517 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................... 1 Background............................................................... 1 Location.............................................................. 1 History and socioeconomics .............................................. 3 Physical setting ............................................................ 3 Climate .............................................................. 3 Vegetation............................................................ 5 Bedrock geology ....................................................... 5 Surficial geology and soils ............................................... 5 Hydrology ................................................................ 8 Surface water ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Yukon Kuskokwim Delta YKTPTRANSPORTATION PLAN Executive Summary March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose I The purpose of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan (Plan) is to inventory transportation facilities and issues, and document transportation needs. The Plan identifies, prioritizes, and recommends the top five regionally significant projects1 for each mode of transportation (aviation, marine, and surface) in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (Y-K Delta). The Y-K Delta is in critical Yukon Kuskokwim Delta need of basic infrastructure necessary for daily life activitiesYKTP including TRANSPORTATION PLAN transportation, facilities, housing, water and sewer, and utilities. The Plan is a 20-year, multimodal, regional transportation plan including various vehicle fleets (e.g. planes, all-terrain vehicles [ATVs], snow machines, barges, skiffs, and automobiles), and modes (e.g. aviation, surface, and marine) of transportation. The Plan is one of six area transportation plans being incorporated into the Alaska Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This is an update to the original Y-K Delta Transportation Plan (2002 YKTP). The Plan is not a programing document. Communities, tribal and city governments, and funding agencies should use this plan as a tool to secure funding for projects from multiple funding sources. The vision for the Plan is: Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan VISION STATEMENT The Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Transportation Plan will guide transportation decisions in the Yukon- Kuskokwim region by promoting safety, livability, economic development, and intermodal connectivity throughout the transportation system. 1 A regionally significant project is one that provides connection between two or more communities; provides access to public facilities such as hospitals, schools, jobs etc.; or March 2018 provides access to alternative modes of transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaskan Region AAL-5 701 C St
    January 26, 1981 81-3 Public Affairs Office FAA -Alaskan Region AAL-5 701 C St . , Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513 (907) 271 - 5296 Alaskan US Deportrnenl of Tronsporlahon Federal Avlollon Intercom Administration NATIONAL HONORS 2 COVER STORY Though we're a bit late in publishing Pacific Contractors and NANA have moved tnese photos, we just got them--and we in more double-wide trailers for two have a new opportunity to pay additional camps to house 120 more men each. crazy tribute to the accomplishments of Horse Camp at Deadhorse has reopended and Joan M. Gillis and Frank Babiak, shown will house 150 men. ARCO and SOHIO each receiving Departmental national honors at plan to build new 500 man camps in the the 13th Annual DOT Awards Ceremony in area. Washington. Making the presentations was former Secretary of Transpor tation Increased activity has already been borne Neil Goldschmidt. The awards were for out by Fairbanks relief specialists outstanding performance in the region. already being put on standby by Wien for Babiak, Manager of the Anchorage Airway January flights, even though reservations Facilities Sector, was honored for are made a month in advance. Additional exceptional effort in the EEO field. flights are planned by Wien. Gillis, Administrative Assistant at the Anchorage _ Sector was given a special The Fairbanks FSS is care fully watching commendation for helping to set the this buildup in order to anticipate a office in order following its almost need for increased watch coverage due to total destruction in a fire in January traffic increases. o f 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Army National Guard Bryant Army Airfield BASH Final EA
    Alaska Army National Guard Bryant Army Airfield BASH Final EA APPENDIX H. AKARNG OPERATIONAL NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN H-1 ALASKA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD OPERATIONAL NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN July 2005 ALASKA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD OPERATIONAL NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN July 2005 Prepared By: Operational Noise Program Directorate of Environmental Health Engineering U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine 5158 Blackhawk Road Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland, 21010-5403 AK ARNG Operational Noise Management Plan July 2005 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 History of Noise Controversy ....................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 The Risk to Military Installations ................................................................. 1-2 1.1.3 Contending with the Risk ............................................................................. 1-4 1.1.4 The Army's Operational Noise Management Plan ....................................... 1-4 1.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Objectives ................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Content ..................................................................................................................... 1-5 2 NOISE MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Year Project Listing by House District
    Two Year Project Listing by House District FY2010 FY2011 Unrestricted Designated Other Federal Unrestricted Designated Other Federal HD Dept Project Title GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total Ketchikan (HD 1) Trans Coffman Cove - Wander Around Town Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 Trans Coffman Cove Maintenance Station 900,000 0 0 0 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Historic Ketchikan, Inc. - Historic Clover Pass School Project 0 0 0 0 0 31,100 0 0 0 31,100 Commerce Hollis - Emergency Services Facility Construction 400,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 EnvCon Ketchikan - Baranof Reservoir Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 1,968,330 0 0 0 1,968,330 Commerce Ketchikan - Bethe Substation Replacement 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Cruise Ship Berth IV Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 Commerce Ketchikan - Fire Station No. 1 Replacement Project 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Replace Cruise Ship Berths I and II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Trans Ketchikan - Replacement and Rehabilitation of Municipal Bridges and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Trestles Commerce Ketchikan - Whitman Lake Hydro Project 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan Area Arts & Humanities Council, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 183/Monday, September 21, 2020
    59220 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 183 / Monday, September 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1): Unless (j) Terminating Action Issued on September 15, 2020. specified otherwise, the hours TIS specified Verification on a helicopter of correct Lance T. Gant, in figure 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD are installation of the MRM upper bearing inner Director, Compliance & Airworthiness those accumulated on the effective date of race retaining rings, as required by paragraph Division, Aircraft Certification Service. this AD by the helicopter since first flight. (i)(1) of this AD, or corrective action on a [FR Doc. 2020–20631 Filed 9–18–20; 8:45 am] (2) If, during any inspection of the MRM helicopter, as specified in paragraphs (h)(2), BILLING CODE 4910–13–P upper bearing sealant bead as required by (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, as applicable, paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, there is damage, constitute terminating action for the before further flight, inspect the installation repetitive inspections required by paragraph of the MRM upper bearing inner race DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION retaining rings for discrepancies in (h)(1) of this AD for that helicopter. Federal Aviation Administration accordance paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. (k) Parts Installation Prohibition (i) MRM Inner Race Retaining Rings As of the effective date of this AD, no 14 CFR Part 71 Inspection person may install, on any helicopter, an (1) For Group 1 Helicopters: Within 660 affected part as identified in paragraph (g)(1) [Docket No. FAA–2020–0823; Airspace Docket No. 20–AAL–49] hours TIS or 6 months, whichever occurs of this AD.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Passenger and Cargo Transportation in Alaska
    PROPERTYOF ISER , FILECOPY DoNot Remove REVIEW OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS A UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND GOVERNMENT RESEARCH VOL. VI, NO. 2 AIRPASSENGER ANDCARGO TRANSPORTATION IN ALASKA The air transportation industry in Alaska is undergoing March that they were beginning an Alaskan Service Inves­ dramatic changes, which are likely to further strengthen tigation . In an announcement to the airlines and other in­ its economic value to the state. New technology and trans­ terested parties, the CAB stated; "The board has decided port needs are increasing carrier competitiveness, while to undertake a comprehensive review of major route pat­ rising equipment and operating costs are lowering profit terns serving Alaska. margins. These conditions, plus growing reluctance on the " It has been over ten years since the board completed part of the federal government to subsidize less efficient an extensive examination of intra-Alaska air transporta­ operations, have resulted in attempts to increase efficiency tion requirements and almost four years since we last ex­ through airline mergers . amined the need for realignment and rievision of the four­ In 1967, Western Airlines International, plagued by an carrier air route complex between the Pacific Northwest announced profit squeeze on its western continental U.S. and Alaska. Significant changes in recent years suggest and Mexican routes, purchased Seattle based Pacific that the time is now ripe for a broad-scale investigation Northern Airlines and expanded operations into Alaska. into Alaskan air transportation requirements. A sound air Alaska Airlines in the past two years acquired Cordova transportation system is vital to the Alaskan economy and Airlines ( the former Coastal and Ellis_Airlines), extending the board intends to examine the entire Alaskan air route its routes throughout Southeastern Alaska and into Dawson, structure to determine what changes are necessary to pro­ Y.T., Canada.
    [Show full text]