DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Evaluation of the Project “A Joint Action for Women's Economic Empowerment in Georgia”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Evaluation of the Project “A Joint Action for Women's Economic Empowerment in Georgia” UN Women Georgia Final evaluation of the project “A Joint Action for Women’s Economic Empowerment in Georgia” Final report Marina Gurbo, International Consultant Medea Gugeshashvili, National Consultant The report is submitted in fulfillment of the Terms of Reference for the final external evaluation of the UN Women JAWE project on December 8, 2020. Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 9 1.1. The project description .................................................................................................... 9 1.2. The socio-economic context of the project .................................................................... 11 1.3. The progress of the country towards achievement of SDGs .......................................... 12 1.4. Barriers and challenges to women’s economic empowerment ...................................... 13 2. Evaluation objectives, approach and methodology .............................................................. 17 2.1. Evaluation objectives ..................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Theoretical framework ................................................................................................... 18 2.3. The scope of evaluation ................................................................................................. 18 2.4. Limitations ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.5. Evaluation standards, criteria and evaluation questions ................................................ 20 2.6. Data collection and analysis........................................................................................... 22 2.7. Evaluation management ................................................................................................. 23 2.8. Ethical issues .................................................................................................................. 24 3. Findings................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1. Relevance ....................................................................................................................... 25 3.2. Coherence ...................................................................................................................... 31 3.3. Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 33 3.4. Efficiency ....................................................................................................................... 49 3.5. Sustainability.................................................................................................................. 53 3.6. Innovativeness................................................................................................................ 56 4. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 59 4.1. Relevance ....................................................................................................................... 59 4.2. Coherence ...................................................................................................................... 60 4.3. Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 60 4.4. Efficiency ....................................................................................................................... 61 4.5. Sustainability.................................................................................................................. 62 4.6. Innovativeness................................................................................................................ 62 5. Lessons learned ..................................................................................................................... 63 6. Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 65 7. Annexes................................................................................................................................. 69 1 Annex 1 Evaluation Matrix ....................................................................................................... 70 Annex 2 Workplan .................................................................................................................... 75 Annex 3 List of documents reviewed ....................................................................................... 77 Annex 4 Stakeholders’ participation in the evaluation ............................................................. 80 Annex 5 Data collection tools ................................................................................................... 82 Annex 6 List of respondents ..................................................................................................... 91 Annex 7 SWOT results ............................................................................................................. 95 Annex 8 Implementations of WEPs by principle ..................................................................... 97 Annex 9 Status of indicators ................................................................................................... 100 Annex 10 Result Matrix .......................................................................................................... 104 Annex 11 Terms of Reference ................................................................................................ 108 List of Tables and Figures p # Figure 1 - JAWE Result Framework and Theory of Change 10 Figure 2 - Gender Pay Gap in Georgia 15 Figure 3 - JAWE ToC 19 Figure 4 - Data collection for final evaluation 22 Figure 5 - Results of the social mobilization component (per region) 30 Figure 6 Distribution of grants by Taso Foundation and GFA (per region) 30 Figure 7 Integration of WEPs 34 Figure 8 Representation of WEPs companies across the sectors 37 Figure 9 Participation in e-courses developed under the JAWE project 38 Table 1 Total disbursement of funds 51 Table 2 Budget allocation by partner 52 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations CDC Creative Development Center CiDA Civil Development Agency FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GAC Gender Advisory Council GEWE Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment GFA Georgian Farmers’ Association GCCI Georgian Chamber of Commerce and Industry GITA Georgian Innovation and Technology Agency IEF Innovative Education Foundation IT Information Technology JAWE A Joint Action for Women’s Economic Empowerment in Georgia LELP Legal Entity of Public Law MTA Maritime Transport Agency NGO Non-Governmental Organization PGA Participatory Gender Audit PDO Public Defender’s Office SDG Sustainable Development Goals SHG Self-Help Group TASO TASO Foundation TVET Technical and Vocational Education and Training UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UN GTG United Nations Gender Theme Group UNSDCF United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework UN-SWAP UN System-wide Action Plan on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women VNR Voluntary National Review WEE Women’s Economic Empowerment WEPs Women’s Empowerment Principles: Equality Means Business W4T Business Leaders’ Federation “Women for Tomorrow” WISTA Women’s International Shipping and Trading Association 3 Executive Summary Introduction The UN Women project “A Joint Action for Women’s Economic Empowerment in Georgia” (JAWE) implemented in 2018 -2020 with the support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs aimed to promote economic empowerment of women, particularly the poorest and the most excluded ones, so that they are able to benefit from development in Georgia. Implemented in most disadvantaged regions of Georgia - Guria, Imereti, Racha-Lechkhumi, Adjara, Shida Kartli and Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti, the project focused on the grassroots social mobilization work and support to women’s employment and entrepreneurship through integration of Women’s Empowerment Principles (WEPs) at the private sector in order to increase the responsibility of private enterprises for achievement of gender equality and women’ economic empowerment in the country. The project’s design integrated interventions at the policy, institutional and grassroots levels to facilitate achievement of the Project Outcome: Women fully realize their economic rights with the support of a gender-responsive private sector and an enabling State legislative and economic environment, which should further contribute to achievement of national strategies and plans that promote inclusive economic growth and help the Government meet undertaken international obligations and commitments including to the Agenda 2030. The project addressed important for the context of Georgia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Situation in Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia – 2011
    2011 The Public Defender of Georgia ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 1 The views of the publication do not necessarily represent those of the Council of Europe. The report was published with financial support of the Council of Europe project, “Denmark’s Georgia Programme 2010-2013, Promotion of Judicial Reform, Human and Minority Rights”. 2 www.ombudsman.ge ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA 2011 2011 THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA ANNUAL REPORT OF THEwww.ombudsman.ge PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 3 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] 4 www.ombudsman.ge CONTENTS INtrodUCTION ..........................................................................................................................7 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ........................................................................11 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ........................................................................................11 ENFORCEMENT OF COUrt JUDGMENTS ...............................................................37 PUBLIC DEFENDER AND CONSTITUTIONAL OVERSIGHT ...........................41 LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS .......................................46 CIVIL-POLITICAL RIGHTS ..................................................................................................51 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATIONS ............................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Trems of Reference for Pcr Validation
    IN.464-17 20 December 2017 Performance Evaluation Report Municipal Services Development Project and Municipal Services Development Project Phase 2 (Georgia) (Loans 2441 and 2534) The attached report is circulated at the request of the Director General, Independent Evaluation Department. For Inquiries: Walter Kolkma, Independent Evaluation Department (Ext. 4189) Ari Perdana, Independent Evaluation Department (Ext. 1891) Performance Georgia: Municipal Services Evaluation Development Project and Municipal Report Services Development Project Phase 2 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Performance Evaluation Report December 2017 Georgia: Municipal Services Development Project and Municipal Services Development Project Phase 2 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB's Public Communications Policy 2011. Reference Number: PPE: GEO 2017-19 Project Numbers: 41198 and 43171 Loan Numbers: 2441-GEO(SF) and 2534-GEO(SF) Independent Evaluation: PE-803 NOTES (i) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. (ii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in Asian Development Bank evaluation reports, see ADB. 2006. Guidelines for Preparing Performance Evaluation Reports for Public Sector Operations. Manila Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Veronique Salze-Lozac’h, IED Director Walter Kolkma, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Ari Perdana, Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Ma. Patricia Lim, Senior Evaluation Officer, IED Jennifer Llaneta, Evaluation Assistant, IED (until October 2017) Christine Grace Marvilla, Evaluation Assistant, IED (from October 2017) The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012
    R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Volume 6 Stakeholder Engagement Plan
    GEORGIA ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Volume 6 Stakeholder Engagement Plan Prepared for: GSE SLR Ref:901.12.1 Version No: #1 July 2019 Georgian State Electrosystem (GSE) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment SLR Ref No:901.12.1 Volume 6 Stakeholder Engagement Plan July 2019 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with GSE (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it.
    [Show full text]
  • NPM Georgia2016.Pdf
    HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN CLOSED INSTITUTIONS (NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM) 2016 www.ombudsman.ge NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM (NPM), 2016 1 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 2 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN CLOSED INSTITUTIONS CONTENTS 1. THE MANDATE OF THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM ....................... 5 2. REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM ................................................................................................... 6 2.1. PREVENTIVE VISITS .................................................................................. 6 2.2. COMMUNICATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS ............................................. 7 2.3. WORKING METHODOLOGY AND TRAINING OF THE NPM STAFF ........ 11 3. SITUATION IN THE PENITENTIARY ESTABLISHMENTS ..................................... 13 3.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW .............................................................................. 13 3.2. SITUATION IN PENITENTIARY ESTABLISHMENTS IN TERMS OF PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT ................................ 23 3.3 ORDER AND SECURITY IN THE ESTABLISHMENTS OF DETENTION AND DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY ............................................................. 31 3.4. PERSONNEL: WORKING CONDITIONS, TRAINING AND ACCOUNTABILITY ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Upr) Mid-Term Progress Report of Georgia on Its Implementation of Recommendations Elaborated in January 2011
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia Human Rights Council UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW (UPR) MID-TERM PROGRESS REPORT OF GEORGIA ON ITS IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS ELABORATED IN JANUARY 2011 Tbilisi, December, 2013 UPR RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation Rec. State Scope of the Competent Measures undertaken Recommendations and the obligation Body of the respective Rec. taken by treaty-based number Georgia bodies ACCESSION TO INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 1. Consider accession to the remaining Brazil Ministry of At present, Georgia is a State Party to the core international human rights 105.1 Foreign Affairs various core international human rights instruments. instruments. Since 2011 Georgia has acceded to the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (in force for Georgia since March 22, 2012); Internal procedures necessary for ratification are in progress relating the following core international human rights instruments: UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol; Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness; International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families; Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. 2. Consider the possibility of becoming a Argentina 1. Ministry of The process of ratification of the Convention party to the following international 105.2 Foreign Affairs on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is instruments: initiated and at present is going
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Primary Education Project in Collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia
    GEORGIA PRIMARY EDUCATION PROJECT MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 1-31, 2016 Contract No. AID-114-C-11-00003 USAID COR: Medea Kakachia Chief of Party: Indira Amiranashvili 9 February, 2016 This material is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Chemonics International Inc., and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Preparation of the material is made within the framework of the USAID Georgia Primary Education Project in collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia. G-PRIED HIGHLIGHTS JANUARY 2016 G-PriEd Portal Continued to interpret Google Analytics to better understand Portal-user behavior: recorded 8,656 users in January (includes both new and returning users), with the highest number of users in a single day being 1,350 (includes both new and returning users) on the Portal-integrated Google Analytics tool (http://www.google.com/analytics/) Continued to revise branded materials uploaded on the Portal with the new G-PriEd logo Completed the testing draft of E-Assess/Math component for screening tests Continued to collect different statistics that can be derived from the Portal. Currently, the following statistics can be produced: 1) General Report on registered TLC facilitators and teachers: http://kargiskola.ge/GC/stats/general.php 2) E-sessions report with the numbers of teachers: http://kargiskola.ge/GC/stats/new/video_new.php 3) Classroom observations/teacher
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 24–28
    CPS Final Georgia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 24–28 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Validation Report January 2019 Georgia Validation of the Country Partnership Strategy Final Review, 2014–2018 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. Independent Evaluation: VR-31 NOTES (i) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. (ii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in Asian Development Bank (ADB) evaluation reports, see ADB. 2015. 2015 Guidelines for the Preparation of Country Assistance Program Evaluations and Country Partnership Strategy Final Review Validations. Manila. Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Véronique N. Salze-Lozac'h, IED Director Walter Kolkma, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Ari A. Perdana, Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Sergio C. Villena, Evaluation Officer, IED Ed Alfred Abrahm M. Alvinez, Evaluation Assistant, IED Christine Grace K. Marvilla, Evaluation Assistant, IED The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference
    [Show full text]
  • 43405-023: Urban Services Improvement Investment Program
    Environmental Monitoring Report ____________________________________________________________________________ Semi-annual Report (July - December 2019) February 2020 GEO(COL): Urban Services Improvement Investment Program – Tranche 1 Prepared by United Water Supply Company of Georgia LLC for the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. SEMI-ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT _________________________________________________________________ Project Number: 43405-023 Reporting Period: July-December 2019 GEORGIA: URBAN SERVICES IMPROVEMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM (TRANCHE 1) (FINANCED BY THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK) Prepared by: Ketevan Chomakhidze, Environmental Specialist, “United Water Supply Company of Georgia”, Tbilisi, Georgia For: The Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank Endorsed by: Maka Goderdzishvili, Head, Department of Environmental Protection and Permits, “United Water Supply Company of Georgia” February, 2020 ABBREVIATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Peculiarities in the Development and Changes in the Subtropical Agricultural Landscapes (In Western Georgia)
    IAR Journal of Agriculture Research and Life Sciences ISSN Print : 2708-5090 | ISSN Online : 2708-5104 Frequency : Monthly Language : English Origin : Kenya Website : https://www.iarconsortium.org/journal-info/iarjals Review Article The peculiarities in the development and changes in the subtropical agricultural landscapes (in western Georgia) Article History Abstract: The article points out natural and anthropogenic factors contributing to the formation, development and alteration of agricultural landscapes in western Georgia, Received: 26.01. 2021 specifically, in the Colkheti coastal plain and the adjacent hilly foothill zone, where Revision: 08. 02. 2021 subtropical agriculture used to be heavily developed (tea and citrus plantations, etc.). The Accepted: 19. 02 .2021 former state-owned tea farm zone in the borough of Laituri, Ozurgeti municipality, Guria Published: 28. 02. 2021 was selected as the study location. GIS technologies were applied to digitalize the 1960 Author Details landscape map of the zone and create its new version (1:50 000) as of 2017 based on the topographical map of 1960 (1:50 000), satellite images and field observations (2010-2017). Elene Salukvazde * and Tamila Chaladze The analysis of the Laituri 1960 and 2017 landscape showed that 66% of tea plantations Authors Affiliations have been amortized and degraded: they have gone wild and are overtaken by weeds. Due to TSU Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, high costs involved, only 10% of the area was cleared to cultivate hazel nuts, blue Georgia huckleberry and persimmon. 24% of tea plantations survive to varying degrees and are currently harvested. Corresponding Author* Elene Salukvazde Keywords: Agricultural landscapes, western Georgia, subtropical agriculture, tea culture, GIS technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Domains
    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana greece lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada grenada lesotho liberia norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic guatemala libya oman sudan andorra chad guinea liechtenstein pakistan palau suriname angola chile guinea-bissau lithuania palestina swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guyana luxembourg panama sweden argentina colombia haiti macau papuanewguinea switzerland macedonia armenia comoros honduras paraguay peru syria madagascar aruba congo hongkong philippines taiwan malawi australia costarica hungary poland portugal tajikistan malaysia austria croatia iceland qatar romania tanzania maldives mali azerbaijan cuba india russia malta thailand bahama curacao indonesia marshallislands rwanda timor-leste bahrain cyprus iran iraq mauritania saintlucia togo tonga bangladesh czechia ireland mauritius samoa trinidadandtobago barbados denmark israel italy mexico sanmarino tunisia turkey belarus djibouti dominica jamaica micronesia saudiarabia turkmenistan belgium dominicanrepublic japan moldova senegal serbia tuvalu uganda seychelles belize ecuador egypt jordan monaco ukraine sierraleone benin elsalvador kazakhstan mongolia unitedarabemirates singapore bhutan equatorialguinea kenya montenegro uk england sintmaarten birma eritrea kiribati morocco unitedkingdom slovakia bolivia estonia northkorea mozambique uruguay slovenia bosniaandherzegovina korea namibia nauru uzbekistan ethiopia solomonislands botswana brazil southkorea nepal vatikan
    [Show full text]