DOCSLIB.ORG

Arent Fox LLP Survey of Data Breach Notification Statutes James Westerlind

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arent Fox LLP Survey of Data Breach Notification Statutes James Westerlind september 2019 Arent Fox LLP Survey of Data Breach Notification Statutes James Westerlind Survey Overview This Survey focuses on the data breach notification statutes of the states and territories within the US, and should be a useful tool and guide for data security planning and response purposes. Smart In Your World arentfox.com September 2019 We are pleased to share with you the third version of Arent Fox LLP’s Survey of Data Breach Notification statutes within the United States and its territories. This Survey includes amendments and new statutes that have been enacted since August of last year, and provides answers to the key initial questions that a company should have with respect to state data breach notification statutes if it learns that the personal identifiable information that it maintains for its customers or employees, or on behalf of other companies that it does business with, has been, or likely has been, breached or used in an unauthorized manner. Namely: (1) Which statutes in a particular jurisdiction apply? (2) Who must comply with the notification requirements? (3) What data is covered by the statutes? (4) What constitutes a data breach? (5) Who must be notified pursuant to the statute? (6) When must notice be sent? (7) In what form or manner must notice be sent? (8) What must the notice say? (9) Are there any exemptions? (10) Who may enforce the requirements and what penalties may be imposed for violations? (11) Are there any data security requirements imposed? (12) Are there any industry-specific requirements? This updated Survey focuses on the data breach notification statutes of the states and territories within the U.S., and should be a useful tool and guide for data security planning and response purposes. If your company experiences a data security incident, one of the first things that you must consider is the potential scope of the incident and whose personal information may be implicated. If you have customers who reside in multiple jurisdictions and whose personal information may have been breached, you will have to analyze the data breach notification rules of each of those jurisdictions and comply with each. While most of the statutes are similar, many have particular nuances that differ, and a failure to comply may result in additional problems and liability for your company. This Survey is intended to make that task easier for you. In addition to state and territory specific statutes, you will also have to consider the applicability of various federal laws and private industry requirements (e.g., HIPAA and the HITECH Act; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; and Payment Card Industry requirements) and, if your company does business outside the U.S., the laws of other countries (e.g., the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which became enforceable on May 25, 2018, and Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, which becomes effective November 1, 2018). While this Survey does not address these additional laws, feel free to give us a call if you have any questions about them. We hope that you find this survey useful. James Westerlind TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 ALABAMA ................................................................................................................................... 5 ARIZONA.................................................................................................................................... 16 ARKANSAS ................................................................................................................................ 20 CALIFORNIA ............................................................................................................................. 23 COLORADO ............................................................................................................................... 31 CONNECTICUT ......................................................................................................................... 37 DELAWARE ............................................................................................................................... 44 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ....................................................................................................... 49 FLORIDA .................................................................................................................................... 53 GEORGIA.................................................................................................................................... 58 GUAM ......................................................................................................................................... 63 HAWAII ...................................................................................................................................... 67 IDAHO ......................................................................................................................................... 72 ILLINOIS ..................................................................................................................................... 76 INDIANA .................................................................................................................................... 82 IOWA ........................................................................................................................................... 87 KANSAS...................................................................................................................................... 92 KENTUCKY ................................................................................................................................ 96 LOUISIANA ................................................................................................................................ 99 MAINE ...................................................................................................................................... 104 MARYLAND ............................................................................................................................ 108 MASSACHUSETTS.................................................................................................................. 116 MICHIGAN ............................................................................................................................... 127 MINNESOTA ............................................................................................................................ 132 MISSISSIPPI ............................................................................................................................. 137 MISSOURI ................................................................................................................................ 143 MONTANA ............................................................................................................................... 148 NEBRASKA .............................................................................................................................. 153 NEVADA ................................................................................................................................... 158 NEW HAMPSHIRE .................................................................................................................. 164 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont’d.) Page NEW JERSEY ........................................................................................................................... 172 NEW MEXICO .......................................................................................................................... 177 NEW YORK .............................................................................................................................. 181 NORTH CAROLINA ................................................................................................................ 189 NORTH DAKOTA .................................................................................................................... 195 OHIO.......................................................................................................................................... 199 OKLAHOMA ............................................................................................................................ 205 OREGON ................................................................................................................................... 208 PENNSYLVANIA ..................................................................................................................... 213 PUERTO RICO ......................................................................................................................... 216 RHODE ISLAND ...................................................................................................................... 219 SOUTH CAROLINA ................................................................................................................. 223 SOUTH DAKOTA .................................................................................................................... 227 TENNESSEE ............................................................................................................................. 230 TEXAS ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arent Fox Government Relations
    Arent Fox Health Care Government A Record of Relations Success GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | HEALTH CARE 2 Rx for Health Care Issues. When and Where You Need It. A former US Senator… A former member of the US House of Representatives… Expert lobbying teams… Proven success… Part of a law firm with more than 400 smart legal minds to draw from… This is Arent Fox Government Relations. A vital team in one of the most respected law firms in Washington, DC, we’re a bipartisan and bicameral group of attorneys and policy professionals with deep experience at the highest levels of politics and public service. ARENT FOX LLP 3 If you want to continue improving the quality of health care, advocate for change, affect regulatory and entitlement program issues, and overcome obstacles created by Federal and state governments – we’re your health care policy partner. 4 Successes. What We’ve Accomplished With Intelligence, Resourcefulness and Ingenuity. We’re doing it all with the best team in the Nation’s Capital: Strategic Advice Regulation of Drugs Regional Medical Providing deep and Devices Helping Centers Representing knowledge of issues with the launch of one of the largest and process through new Part B and D regional medical former members of products, including centers in the South Congress, who were developing marketing (the University of significant national materials, action plans Arkansas for Medical players in health care for obtaining local Sciences), helping to issues and legislation coverage decisions, secure Federal funding, including the bipartisan design of patient obtain previously Healthy Americans Act. assistance programs, denied Medicaid- and strategies for enhanced physician Health Care Reform minimizing provider payments, build a Helping providers and billing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hole” in One for Nesbø
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Travel Heritage Update No. 1 from A day to Hvis du tror du kan gjøre det, så celebrate all the St. Olaf Choir! kan du. – John Burroughs fathers Read more on page 9 Read more on page 14 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 124 No. 23 June 14, 2013 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy News in brief Find more at blog.norway.com “Hole” in one for Nesbø News Cash worth NOK 17.2 million has Jo Nesbø’s tenth been confiscated by Norwegian Harry Hole thriller Customs so far this year, an increase of nearly 20 percent in was released one year. Customs fear that the in Norway on problem will increase with the Euro crisis. Of the confiscated June 6 to great money, NOK 9.2 million has been discovered among passengers excitement at the Oslo Airport Gardermoen during the first five months of this year. However, Customs estimate that NOK 2 – 3 billion STAFF COMPILATION is smuggled out of Norway Norwegian American Weekly each year. Large amounts are whitewashed and brought back. They believe the money may On June 6, the long awaited be linked to illegal import of tenth installment in the Harry Hole drugs, human trafficking and series, “Politi” (which means sim- prostitution. ply “Police”) was released in Nor- (Norway Post) way. Aschehoug, Jo Nesbø’s Nor- Business wegian publisher, arranged a big Statoil is drilling well number release-party with nearly a thou- 100 in the Barents Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Scarlet Letter
    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION VOLUME LXXVI NUMBER XI DECEMBER 2019 www.mnbar.org THE NEW SCARLET LETTER Is Minnesota’s Predatory Offender Registry helping or hurting? START SAVING TIME AND MONEY NOW WITH FASTCASE Smarter Legal Research. Free for MSBA Members. Fastcase is the leading next-generation legal research service that puts a comprehensive national law library and powerful searching, sorting, and data visualization tools at your fingertips. As a member of the MSBA you have free access to fastcase. LEARN MORE ABOUT FASTCASE Login at: www.mnbar.org/fastcase Live Webinars – Thursdays, Noon - 1:00 PM fastcase.com/webinars On-Demand CLE ® mnbar.org/fastcase/on-demand-cle practicelaw videos mnbar.org/practicelaw/fastcaseVSgoogle mnbar.org/practicelaw/fastcaseLegalResearch Find What You Need, Fast. Questions? Contact Mike Carlson at the MSBA at 612-278-6336 or [email protected] 0819 fastcase.indd 1 9/18/19 9:16 AM START SAVING TIME AND MONEY NOW WITH FASTCASE Smarter Legal Research. Free for MSBA Members. Fastcase is the leading next-generation legal research service that puts a comprehensive national law library and powerful searching, sorting, and data visualization tools at your fingertips. As a member of the MSBA you have free access to fastcase. LEARN MORE ABOUT FASTCASE Login at: www.mnbar.org/fastcase Live Webinars – Thursdays, Noon - 1:00 PM fastcase.com/webinars On-Demand CLE ® mnbar.org/fastcase/on-demand-cle practicelaw videos mnbar.org/practicelaw/fastcaseVSgoogle mnbar.org/practicelaw/fastcaseLegalResearch
    [Show full text]
  • Arent Fox LLP Survey of Damage Laws of the 50 States Including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico
    Arent Fox LLP Survey of Damage Laws of the 50 States including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico Insurance & Reinsurance Elliott M. Kroll Practice Group James M. Westerlind Arent Fox LLP Survey of Damage Laws of the 50 States including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico by Elliott M. Kroll and James M. Westerlind Copyright © 2012 Arent Fox LLP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of Arent Fox LLP. Published by Arent Fox LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Designed by Arent Fox LLP. Printed in the United States of America. ARENT FOX LLP washington, dc / new york / los angeles / arentfox.com Introduction Arent Fox LLP Survey of Damage Laws of the 50 States including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico October 2011 We are pleased to share with you the Arent Fox LLP Survey of Damage Laws of the 50 States including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Tort and business-related litigation is a fact of life for companies in the United States. Companies are under assault from employment-related suits, intellectual property suits, product liability suits, environmental claims and a host of tort and contract litigation. Tort reform is a frequent topic of legislative discussion, but it does little to limit the creativity of the plaintiffs’ bar. Businesses need to be able to operate with reasonable certainty concerning the nature and magnitude of the risks that they face.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Analysis Our Washington Insiders React from the Left
    Insight. Inspiration. Advocacy. Inspiration. Insight. Election Analysis Smart In Your World Our Washington Insiders React From the Left The two political parties will no doubt continue to have difficulty agreeing on some major issues. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be any opportunities to advance legislation on important matters. Even as the parties battle over some big issues, the Congress will still have to enact appropriation and authorization legislation and that always provides opportunities for legislative accomplishments. In addition, there will be other deadlines (debt ceiling and more) that will require the Congress to act. When they act, there is an Sen. Byron L. Dorgan opportunity to write new or improve existing Co-Chair, Government legislation on many issues. So, there will be talk Relations Practice about “gridlock,” but even in that climate, there are opportunities to get things done. Fixing bad legislation, improving existing legislation, and writing new legislation … all of these actions are possible, even when the political parties don’t get along. But it requires skilled strategy and advice from those who know how the system works and how to get things done during a challenging time. That is what our Government Relations Practice is able to do for our clients. Our Washington Insiders React From the Right The midterm election leaves neither party with a political mandate or firm domination over either chamber in Congress. In a polarized political system with a shrinking ideological center, the primary likely outcome involves concentration on less divisive issues. While the struggle between the parties will continue around tax reform, healthcare and immigration issues, there is still a common interest in moving forward on infrastructure Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Arent Fox LLP
    Arent Fox LLP 2020 VAULT/MCCA LAW FIRM DIVERSITY SURVEY 1717 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 202.857.6000 Fax: 202.857.6395 www.arentfox.com LOCATIONS Boston; Los Angeles; New York; San Francisco DIVERSITY LEADERSHIP Head(s) of Firm: Cristina Carvalho, Firmwide Managing PartnerMark Katz, Chair Diversity team leader(s): Jennifer Halliday, Chief Human Resources Officer; Christopher Norton, Partner; Darrell Gay, Partner; Marwa Hassoun, Partner; Jeannette McLaughlin, Partner; Jeff Leung, Counsel; Alison Bygrave, Director of Diversity & Inclusion NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS Currently As of December 31, 2019 Worldwide 0 0 U.S. offices only 412 416 Response to Spring 2020 Vault/MCCA Law Firm Diversity Survey. Complete survey results available in Law Firm Diversity Database (http://mcca.vault.com). Copyright © 2020 Vault.com Inc. and Minority Corporate Counsel Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Arent Fox LLP 2020 VAULT/MCCA LAW FIRM DIVERSITY SURVEY Law Firm Demographic Profile Does your firm have more than one tier of partnership? Yes ASSOCIATES (2019) SUMMER ASSOCIATES (2019) Men Women Men Women White/Caucasian 57 37 White/Caucasian 3 4 African-American/Black 4 8 African-American/Black 0 2 Hispanic/Latinx 5 9 Hispanic/Latinx 0 0 Alaska Native/American Indian 0 0 Alaska Native/American Indian 0 0 Asian 10 14 Asian 1 2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 0 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 0 Multiracial 2 2 Multiracial 0 0 Openly LGBTQ 5 0 Openly LGBTQ 0 0 Individuals with Disabilities 0 0 Individuals with Disabilities
    [Show full text]
  • 100Largest Law Firms in Massachusetts
    100LARGEST LAW FIRMS IN MASSACHUSETTS 2020 THE BBA THANKS 135+ SPONSORS Supporting excellence in the profession, access to justice, diversity & inclusion, and service to the Boston community. LAW FIRMS GOVERNMENT 30+ Years of Sponsorship: Boston Planning & Development Agency | Committee Brown Rudnick LLP | Choate | Foley Hoag LLP | Goodwin | for Public Counsel Services | Massachusetts Commission Goulston & Storrs | Locke Lord LLP | Mintz | Ropes & Gray | Against Discrimination (MCAD) | Massachusetts WilmerHale Department of Energy Resources | Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection | Office of Labor 20+ Years of Sponsorship: Relations of the City of Boston | Office of the Corporation Burns & Levinson | Conn Kavanaugh | Day Pitney | Donnelly, Counsel of the City of Boston | Office of the Massachusetts Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP | Hemenway & Barnes LLP | Hogan Attorney General | Suffolk County District Attorney’s Lovells | Murphy & King | Nixon Peabody | Nutter | Peabody & Office Arnold | Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster | Robinson & Cole | Sherin and Lodgen | Sugarman Rogers | Sullivan | Todd & Weld LLP | Yurko, Salvesen & Remz, P.C. IN-HOUSE LEGAL DEPARTMENTS Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts | Coverys | Dell 10+ Years of Sponsorship: EMC | LPL Financial | Partners HealthCare | Spartan Race, Anderson & Kreiger | Casner & Edwards | Dain Torpy | Davis Inc. | State Street Corporation | UMASS Boston Office of Malm | DLA Piper | Duane Morris | Gesmer Updegrove General Counsel LLP | Greenberg Traurig | Hinckley Allen | Hirsch Roberts Weinstein | Holland & Knight | Morgan, Brown & Joy, LLP | Ogletree Deakins | Robins Kaplan LLP | Rose Law Partners LAW SCHOOLS Boston College Law School | Boston University School of LLP | Ruberto, Israel & Weiner | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Law | New England Law | Boston | Northeastern University Meagher & Flom LLP | SUGARMAN | Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP | Verrill | Weil School of Law | Suffolk University Law School 5+ Years of Sponsorship: NON-PROFITS Arent Fox | Arrowood LLP | Atwood & Cherny, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Arent Fox Government Relations
    Arent Fox Health Care Government A Record of Relations Success GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | HEALTH CARE 2 Rx for Health Care Issues. When and Where You Need It. T wo former U.S. Senators… A former member of the U.S. House of Representatives… Expert lobbying teams… Proven success… Part of a law firm with more than 350 smart legal minds to draw from… This is Arent Fox Government Relations. A vital team in one of the most respected law firms in Washington, DC, we’re a bipartisan and bicameral group of attorneys and policy professionals with deep experience at the highest levels of politics and public service. ARENT FOX LLP 3 I f you want to continue improving the quality of health care, advocate for change, affect regulatory and entitlement program issues, and overcome obstacles created by Federal and state governments – we’re your health care policy partner. GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | HEALTH CARE 4 Successes. What We’ve Accomplished With Intelligence, Resourcefulness and Ingenuity. We’re doing it all with the best team in the Nation’s Capital: Strategic Advice Regulation of Drugs Regional Medical Providing deep and Devices Helping Centers Representing knowledge of issues with the launch of one of the largest and process through new Part B and D regional medical former members of products, including centers in the South Congress, who were developing marketing (the University of significant national materials, action plans Arkansas for Medical players in health care for obtaining local Sciences), helping to issues and legislation coverage decisions, secure Federal funding, including the bipartisan design of patient obtain previously Healthy Americans Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing America's Judiciary: a Dialogue with The
    RECOGNIZING AMERICA’S JUDICIARY: A DIALOGUE WITH THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND CHIEF JUDGE ON KEY ISSUES FOR LEADERS OF BUSINESS & THE COMMUNITY March 20, 2011 - Minneapolis, Minnesota RECOGNIZING AMERICA’S JUDICIARY: A DIALOGUE WITH THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND CHIEF JUDGE ON KEY ISSUES FOR LEADERS OF BUSINESS & THE COMMUNITY DIRECTORS ROUNDTABLE March 20, 2012 Minneapolis, MN Judges, in upholding the rule of law, critically affect every area of American life including the economy, property rights, personal liberty, and democratic values. These distinguished speakers will analyze issues which are not only key for lawyers, but also important for business leaders and other citizens. These include key issues facing business; how companies and other groups can be effectively represented in court; and what resources are needed for efficient operation of the courts to enhance timeliness and reduce the cost of litigation for the parties. Specific topics to be discussed by the distinguished panelists include effective appellate strategies; intellectual property; e-discovery and other technology; and product liability. A unique series of parallel events with chief justices and chief judges is being held in major cities nationwide. Appreciation is given to guests of honor Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Minnesota Lorie Skjerven Gildea and Chief U.S. District Judge Michael Davis for their cooperation in this event. The Directors Roundtable Institute is a not-for-profit which organizes worldwide programming for Directors and their advisors. GUESTS OF HONOR Hon. Lorie Skjerven Gildea Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Minnesota Hon. Michael Davis Chief United States District Judge (Minnesota) DISTINGUISHED PANELISTS Eric Magnuson Shareholder, Briggs and Morgan, P.A.; Former Chief Justice of Minnesota Michael Kane Principal, Fish & Richardson, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • State Judiciary Judiciary in Minnesota
    Chapter Six State Judiciary Judiciary in Minnesota ....................................................................................368 Minnesota Supreme Court ..............................................................................368 Minnesota Court of Appeals ...........................................................................371 Minnesota District Court ...............................................................................377 Office of Administrative Hearings ..................................................................401 Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals .....................................................404 Tax Court ........................................................................................................405 Judicial-related Agencies .................................................................................406 B Capitol Beginnings B A photo from November 18, 1902 shows brickwork in the chambers of the Minnesota Supreme Court under construction. The Supreme Court was housed in the east wing of the Capitol until 1990, when it moved across the street to the Minnesota Judicial Center. Minnesota Historical Society State Judiciary THE JUDICIARY IN MINNESOTA Minnesota Constitution provides: The judicial power of the state is vested in a Supreme Court, a Court of Appeals, if established by the Legislature, a District Court and such other courts, judicial officers, and com mis sion ers with jurisdiction inferior to the District Court as the Legislature may establish (Article VI,
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Benefit Summary Guide Arent Fox
    2018 Benefit Summary Guide Arent Fox Table of Contents Benefits Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Benefit Plans Offered .........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Eligibility—Full-time ...........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Eligibility—Part-time ...........................................................................................................................................................................................3 New for 2018 .........................................................................................................................................................................................................4 New Life and STD / LTD Carrier ........................................................................................................................................................................4 New Voluntary Benefits — Critical Illness, Hospitalization, and Voluntary Accident .........................................................................................4 Medical Benefits ....................................................................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Law Firms in Massachusetts 2021
    1002021 LARGEST LAW FIRMS IN MASSACHUSETTS THE BBA THANKS 135+ SPONSORS Supporting excellence in the profession, access to justice, diversity & inclusion, and service to the Boston community. LAW FIRMS GOVERNMENT 30+ Years of Sponsorship: Boston Planning & Development Agency | Committee for Brown Rudnick LLP | Choate | Foley Hoag LLP | Goodwin | Public Counsel Services | Massachusetts Commission Goulston & Storrs | Locke Lord LLP | Mintz | Ropes & Gray Against Discrimination (MCAD) | Massachusetts | WilmerHale Department of Energy Resources | Massachusetts 20+ Years of Sponsorship: Department of Environmental Protection | Office of Labor Burns & Levinson | Conn Kavanaugh | Day Pitney | Relations of the City of Boston | Office of the Corporation Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP | Hemenway & Barnes Counsel of the City of Boston | Office of the Massachusetts LLP | Hogan Lovells | Murphy & King | Nixon Peabody | Attorney General | Suffolk County District Attorney’s Nutter | Peabody & Arnold | Rackemann, Sawyer & Office Brewster | Robinson & Cole | Sherin and Lodgen | Sugarman Rogers | Sullivan | Todd & Weld LLP | Yurko, IN-HOUSE LEGAL DEPARTMENTS Salvesen & Remz, P.C. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts | Coverys | Dell EMC | LPL Financial | Mass General Brigham | State Street 10+ Years of Sponsorship: Corporation | UMASS Boston Office of General Counsel Anderson & Kreiger | Casner & Edwards | Dain Torpy | Davis Malm | DLA Piper | Duane Morris | Gesmer Updegrove LLP | Greenberg Traurig | Hinckley Allen | LAW SCHOOLS Boston College Law School
    [Show full text]