DOCSLIB.ORG

STATE of FLORIDA Erosion Control Details

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STATE of FLORIDA Erosion Control Details STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 Spacing of Posts: FABRIC MATERIAL WHEN FABRIC IS INSTALLED IN A TRENCH WITH COMPACTED Up to 6 feet apart for Type 3 SOIL, ANCHORS CAN BE Up to 10 feet apart for Type 4 ATTACHED TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL OF "BLOWOUTS" (NOT NEEDED IF "SLICING" METHOD IS USED) MIN BACKFILL TRENCH STEEL OR WOOD POST INSTALLED AFTER COMPACTION OF "SLICE" FABRIC MATERIAL MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POSTS OR (IF USED) TO THE WIRE MESH WOOD OR STEEL POST INSTALLED BEFORE COMPACTING BACKFILL "ATERIAL ~ COMPACTED ISLICING METHOD I BACKFILL MATERIAL ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES RUNOFF WHEN TRENCHING IS USED PLACE THE END POST OF ONE FENCE INSIDE THE END POST OF THE OTHER FENCE ROTATE BOTH POSTS AT LEAST 180 DEGREES IN A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION TO CREATE A TIGHT SEAL WITH THE FABRIC FABRIC MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED IN A 6-IN. MATERIAL x 6-IN. TRENCH WITH A "L" SHAPE BEFORE DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATER BACKFILLING AND COMP ACTING THE SOIL. DRIVE BOTH POSTS ABOUT 12-IN. INTO THE • • • GROUND AND BURY THE ITRENC HING METHOD I --------------- FLAP IN A TRENCH © 2001 Hydroo}~~~'"' SILT FENCE BARRIER INS TA LLATION 11 03 Figure V-2: Illustration of a Silt Fence Barrier Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail V-7 STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 Approved Ntemate FOOT TYPE Ill Silt Fence System State of Florida Erosion & Sediment Control Designer & Reviewer Manual ~DING STRIP {1' x t'x 24' ) •s{trAPI.fS X!!')~~ c .....----.-." ' 1:~-ll"-~ 1 REPAIR DETAIL ATTACHING lWO SIILT FENCES WHEN TRENCHING IS USED Black Band ~ - 6'MAXO.C. ~ FI.ICETI£ENOPOST z OF ClN: FENCE IGOE ~ ' Tl£ EHO POSTOf Tl£ r ~ OTMERF£HCE 2'·6" ~ . ~ 2'~ ~ 38'f/IIJif/CaeAF z ' ~ ' I ~ ------- '~'- ~ lj ROTATE IOTWPOST ~ ' ATI.EAST1«J""A. 1'-6' ~ '"'""' ~ Ct<lCKYt,SE ORCTIOH ~ TO~TEA TIGHT L ' ~ "-- '"""""""P08TICO<I ~ SEAl. YomiTHE FABAIC 16\TEIIIAI. FRONT ELEVA110N IINYUII OVEFUP ':6 W IS TO BE I'IOlVal> AT IU Sf\.lC:E JOINTS OllECT10N Of RUNOFF WATER lliUIII;IlOTMPOST'S AIIOUT12.tiii!OTHE GAOIN)I>WJIIJRY'I!tE ' ' ' RAP IN ATRENCH Silt Fence - Priority 2 - Black Band ------- SILT FENCE BARRIER INSTALLATION lualrallon o1 a Sl Fence BM1er Figure V-3: Illustration of Silt Fence Priority 2 – Black Band V-10 STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 Approved Alternate FOOT TYPE IV Silt Fence System State of Florida Erosion &Sediment Control Designer &Reviewer Manual llOIIIll«lSlRIP ( l'xl'x ~·) 10'(1YP)r F..-;TQBEU'NJIJVEGR(XJNO l'tTTH 'r IN TRENCH OR SUCI«l l MElHOO Nl' 'l.V REPAIR DETAIL ATTACHING 1WO SIILT FENCES WHEN TRENCHING IS USED Green Band 4'MAXO.C. ', , , PlACE 1l£OOPOST rl OfONEFB«::i:IGOE 1l£Et«> POST Of 1l£ 2'·6' I ontERFEHCE ~ 2'.(1' ~ ,......,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~~ ~ ~ ~~-- ~ ~ ~ ROTATE BOTH l'(lST ~ ,,_, ATLEASTtiO' tU. 1'-€' , , ', , Q.OCIMISEDIO£C110tl .~ TOCREATEAllOHT , ' : , L ~ ~I.I)I«;WQtDQT((W() 9!".11. WITH THE FASAIC MATERIH. FRONT ELEVAT10N llftCTlON Of RUNOff WATER ' ' ' DRJ'IEABOOT12.ffllTOTHE BOTH POSTS GROUCIAt«>IIUI!YllE flAP .. A TRENCH BEL TED SILT RETENTION FENCE (BSRF) Priority 1 - Green Band ------- SILT FENCE BARRIER INSTALLATION ·-ol· Sil Fence- Figure V-4: Illustration of Belted Silt Retention Fence – Type IV Priority 1 V-13 STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 ;.· EXTEND ENDS OF FIBER LOGS ENOUGH TO PREVENT RUNOFF --_:::...~----;;---:-..:: • . b FROM FLOWING AROUND THE ENDS <l. OF THE BARRIER. 4 . < WHEN BARRIER IS INSTALLED BEHIND A SIDEWALK OR CURB, FIBER LOG DOES NOT INSTALL 8-IN. LONG METAL HAVE TO BE PLACED STAPLES FOR ADDITIONAL WITH IN A TRENCH REINFORCEMENT SIDEWALK OR ~--1-IN. X 2-IN. ---..__ WOODEN STAKE CURB BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL .. 4-IN. ... f FIBER LOG BARRIER FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS Figure V-5. Illustration of Fiber Log Barriers for Individual Lots Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail V-15 STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 CONTAINED RUNOFF WATERS ·'-----------------------­ . ~ ;--------..------------; TOP HELD IN PLACE -----------------------~ , BY HOG RINGS OR ________________________ STAPLES J------------------­·-----------------­ ------------------------~------------------------- -~------------------------------------------------ APPROXIMATELY 12 -lt\1 . GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC MATERIAL WRAPPED AROUND PLAN VIE W SAND AND/OR ROCK 1.0-TO 1.5-IN. DIAMETER ROCK BARRIER SECTI ON CUT SLITS IN FABRIC OF THE ROCK BARRIER SECTIO FOR DRAINAGE SAND OR ROCK MATERIAL SAND FILLED FRONT VIEW SECTION SIDE VIEW TOP HELD IN PLACE CUT SLITS IN FABRIC OF THE ROCK BY HOG RINGS OR BARRIER SECT! N FOR DRAINAGE STAPLES 8- TO 16-IN. t GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC MATERIAL WRAPPED AROUND SAND AND/OR ROCK BACK VIEW NOTE: PLACE AT LEAST ONE 3-FT. WIDE ROCK SECTION AT A LOW POINT FOR DRAINAGE OF CONTAINED RUNOFF WATERS CONTINUOUS BERM BARR IER 11 /03 Figure V-7: Illustration of a Continuous Berm Barrier Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail V-19 STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 IF A GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC MATERIAL IS USED, IT MUST BE STAPLED SECURELY TO THE GROUND GEOSYNETHETIC FABRIC MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED IN A TRENCH AND BACKFILLED A PLAN VIEW RIGID BARRIER OR FOAM PAD WRAPPED WITH A GEOSYNTHETIC FABRIC MATERIAL FABRIC MATERIAL STAPLED IN A 3- TO 6-IN. TRENCH SECURE BARRIER AND ABRIC MATERIAL IN GROUND BY STAPLES STAPLE SEC TI ON A-A GEOSYNTHETIC BARR IER IN STA LLATION 11 03 Figure V-8: Illustration of a Geosynthetic Barrier Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail V-21 Figure V-9: Illustration ofInstal TOP TENSION ME.MBER St/16" GAI.V COATED CABLE NiNNIM O.al.V1Hii. 8lES,GALV SHACKLE TONEXTSAAFtER. OPTIONAL PVC tl.OTTEO TUBE celNNE<:~ GAlV SHI\CKI.tS lO STRSSSPLATl:S MIN seot.PVC<..O\'ERfOBARRERFABRIC STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 SEAl. Wn1 METIL STRCNG8ACK~ fl.OAT· MIN I"POLY ClOSED<.'lL FOA.M SEALED IN FABRIC SEE HOTE.c SEALED TO FOFtM E~VEI.OPE. S~T & CtW"t f1EM LOCKING T..:>GGlEO; NYI.ONUNE FI,.(..AT•MIN. 6" POl.Y ClOSEO.c.EU FOAU ..E AtE O IN FA9fU: D D 8AUA$T,e0n"OM TE..~SK."IN: $118" GlllVCtWN 1.' 'f't.M! B.AUAST: 1U" GAI..V Ct\AIN NOTES: ~~ LV $.HACKl£ TO NEXT BARRIER. Cl-¥oi NCc»•fJLETEl.Y EHCASEO IN PVC FABRIC LEGEND: D = OVERALL DEPTH GALV SHACKlES TO All.NINIJM S:TA:e.S:; P\.ATE$ 1. DRAWING NOT TO SCALE CHAlNCOMPLETE\.Y ENCASED iN PV<;FAQR!C lin 2. BARRIER MUST HAVE A MINIMUM 4" FREEBOARD 3. FLOATS. LACING GROMMET STRI P AND BALLAST CHAIN SEALED IN BARRIER FABRIC g a Floating Turbidity Barrier g aFloating 4. VERTICAL SEALS BETWEEN FLOAT SEGMENTS TOP TEN$!0.'1 MEMO( R: $116" OALV COA TEO CABlE I.!INMUI .t G~Vlrlr!eLE ' G.Al.V SHo\CKLETOHElC1 8ARRIEft 5. OVERALL DEPTH TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OAI.V SHACKLES TO STRESS PLATES 6. BARRIER TYPE AND DEPTH TO BE IMPRINTED ON FLOAT, MIN. 2 1N LETTERING FLOAT:MIN, t• POlY Ct.OSEQ.(;ELL FOMt f EAlEDIN fABRIC \ '11)VfN GEO fll. TER Fo\S:t!C S~ INTO SKIRT.r.liNMJM ~.,_Of 6EI.O'N"""'TEI~E SKIRT) 7. 18 OZ . PVC COVERED BARRIER FABRIC MINIMUM V-24 8. CONNECTIONS BY LAC ING GROMMETS, SLOTTED TUBE OR UNIVERSAL ALUMINUM CONNECTOR 9. FLOTATION SIZED FOR SKIRT DEPTH/WEIGHT t,~ 14at PVC COVER€0 &ARRSER I'AeAJC :::.~ TO FOi'JA EIW'Et.OPE, ROPe: t-E.M& CHAINHI:M, jPVC_ BCRDERAROl.NDG£0'/¥0VENFA9RIC FA8AfC OOUBL£-WRAPPEO A.ROUND POST AT JOiNT TO PRE','ENT GAPP~NG POST AT LEAST 18'" INTO GROUNO ~ 6' MAX.----' <:0 \I..V SHACKLE TO NEXT BARRIER:, GN.,.V$HACKlES TOAUJMIMJN STRE ~ ": PlATES CHAIN C0'.4PLEY'E:I.Y ~"'CACEO INPVC fABPJC ~--~~~=~ ~i~ - - - u r u STAKED TUR BIDITY BARRIER 2012 FOOT Design Standards 1 1 Sheet no 1 of2 TURBIDITY BARRIERS Figure V-10: Illustration ofInst WORK ZONES STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 12" MIN. TIOI.L CURRENT NOTES: I allin 1. TURBIDITY BARRIERS ARE TO BE USED IN All PERMANENT 'soOIES OF WATER, REGARDLESS OF WATER DEPTH SHORe ANCHOR 2. TURBIDITY BARRIERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED PERPENDICUlAR TO THE MAIN g aFloatingTurbidity Barrier FLOW OF A SIGNIFICANT BODY OF MOVING WATER 3. IN AREAS OF TIDAL FLOW, PlACE BUOYED ANCHORS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE SINGLE ANCHOR BARRIER TO PREVENT BARRIER FROM OVERRIDING ANCHOR ON TIDE CHANGE V..1TH BUOY 4. DO NOT ANCHOR FROM BOTIOM HEM 5. BARRIER MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 41NCH FREEBOARD V-25 EXAMPLES OF TIDAL, SINGLE DIRECTION 6. ANCHOR SPACING NORMALLY 100FT. MAY NEED 50FT SPACING OR lARGER ANCHORS IN AREAS OF HIGHER CURRENT FLOW AND CALM WATER INSTALLATIONS 7. SHORE ANCHORS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE, WITH DEADMAN, IF NEEDED 6. KEEP CHAIN HEM MINIMUM 1 FT OFF BOTIOM AT LOW TIDE 9. DESIGN OF BARRIER AND ANCHOR SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS THAT MEET OR EXCEED THIS FOOT STANDARD 10. LIGHTED BUOYS SHALL BE USED TO MEET REGUlATORY STANDARDS 11. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SEE SECTION 104 OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. ANCHOR SYSTEM CALM WATER BARRIER CURT AJN 18# MIN. GALV. DANFORTH· TYPE ANCHOR 2012 FOOT Desian Standards Sheet no 2of2 TURBIDITY BARRIERS STATE OF FLORIDA E&SC DESIGNER & REVIEWER MANUAL; LATEST EDITION: JULY 2013 Approved Altemate FOOT - Staked Turbidity Barrier State of Florida Erosion & Sediment Control Designer & Reviewer Manual Belled Silt Retention Fence (Priority 1) I!OIO!HJSTRIP (1'zt'zU') ID'(TYP)r F.....CTOIE>c"._,C)IO)OJN> MTli ·r11 TRBtal ORaJCNJ l UElliOO Nr REPAIR DETAIL AIT ACHING lWO SIILT FENI);S vniEH TRENCHING IS USED , Green Band , : - •·MAXo.c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: an Overview
    Geotextiles and Geomembranes I I (1992) 535-550 The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: An Overview M. S. Theisen Erosion Control Materials, Synthetic Industries, Construction Products Division, 4019 Industry Drive, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37416, USA ABSTRACT The use ofgeosynthetic erosion and sediment materials continues to expand at a rapid pace. From their early beginnings in the late 1950s, geosynthetic materials today are the backbone of the erosion and sediment control industry. Geosynthetic components are an integral part of erosion and sediment materials ranging from temporary products such as hydraulic mulch geofibers, plastic erosion control meshes and nettings, erosion control blankets and silt fences to high performance turf reinforcement mats, geocellular confinement systems, erosion control geotextiles andfabric formed revetments. This paper provides a brief overview of these materials and concepts. INTRODUCTION Hopefully we are entering a new environmental era where concern for the protection of our planet's natural resources will reach global proportions. Continued technological advances have led to improved monitoring of Earth's vital signs. As such, prior theoretical modeling of environmental concerns such as the greenhouse effect, ozone depletion, rising sea levels, deforestation, drought, accelerated erosion, sediment loading of waterways, species extinction and the eventual downfall of mankind appear chillingly realistic. 535 536 M. S. Theisen Slogans such as 'Think globally, act locally', 'Love your mother' and 'Someone always lives downstream' are spearheading the efforts of numerous preservation groups. With the continued demise of oppressive governments, optimism for world peace and an unprecedented feeling of global unity, a spirit of environmental cooperation is beginning to prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fence Note
    9/3/2020 9:29:31 AM N:\CFL-DPIT\Drawings\FP-14\FP14_Details\C157-50.dgn _User: Angela.Johnson_ POST ANDGEOTEXTILEINSTALLATIONDETAIL See EndPostsDetail End posts ELEVATION 18" min. 30" min. See note5 Geotextile END POSTSDETAIL Fil l s lo pe 24" min. See Note3 END DETAIL PLAN 6" min. Backfilled andcompactedsoil F Fence supportmesh(optional) l Steel orwoodpost o See note5 Geotextile Staple ortie w Steel orwoodpost 6" min.trench PLAN Toe of slope See Note3 Posts Detail See End End posts (undisturbed) Existing ground Limits ofclearing SILT FENCEINSTALLATIONATTOEOFFILL for spacing See Note4 SILT FENCE ASPERIMETER CONTROL Existing ground A A Roadway Edge ofshoulder See TypicalSectionSheet Edge ofshoulder SECTION A-A Fill ELEVATION Varies Varies PLAN PLAN Flow Flow Toe ofslope Toe ofslope Silt fence S h Toe of slope e F e il t l s f l l o o p w e Silt fence Top ofpoststiedtogether. Posts driventightlytogether. Steel orwoodposts NO SCALE See note5 Section A Geotextile POSTS ATJOINTS REVISED: 08/2014 07/2020 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. NOTE: 713.16(a). Furnish geotextileconformingtosubsection 6 ft.(max.) Post spacing 10 ft.(max.) Post spacing running aroundtheends. fence uptheslopetopreventwaterfrom As theslopeisconstructed,curvesilt contours ascloselypossible. Install siltfencetofollowtheground manufacturer's recommendations. machine-sliced siltfenceaccordingtothe slicing asapprovedbytheCO.Install Silt fencemaybeinstalledusingmachine CENTRAL FEDERALLANDSHIGHWAYDIVISION PLAN DETAIL APPROVEDFORUSE U.S. DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAYADMINISTRATION U.S. CUSTOMARYDETAIL SILT FENCE without with STATE Fasten fabrictoposts. each postonefullturn. Fold geotextilearound fencesupportmesh= Staple ortie fencesupportmesh= See note5 Section B Geotextile PROJECT C157-50 DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NOTES TO THE DESIGNER Last Updated: July 2020 General Information 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Silt Fences
    Article 56 Feature article from Watershed Protection Techniques. 2(3): 424-428 Strengthening Silt Fence ilt fences are one of the most widely used and reality, settling is actually the most important sedi- misused erosion and sediment control practices. ment removal function of silt fences (Kouwen, 1990), SRecent data suggest that they can perform well since runoff is detained behind the fence, giving sedi- under some circumstances. In addition, their cost- ment time to settle out. effectiveness continues to make them a popular ESC Three recent studies report sediment removal ef- technique. Unfortunately, silt fences are often used ficiencies ranging from 36 to 86% (Table 1). It is al- inappropriately or are improperly installed or maintained, most impossible to accurately predict the field perfor- resulting in poor performance. Simple improvements to mance of silt fences because relatively little research the standard silt fence, as well as some innovative has been done, and the results are so variable. This designs, can help to improve the current state of silt being said, some useful information emerges from fences. available data. First, these studies suggest that silt fences are more effective at removing coarser-grained How, and How Well, Do They Work? materials. Conversely, silt fences are ineffective at Silt fences trap sediment in construction runoff be- reducing turbidity, which is disproportionately influ- fore it washes into the street, a neighboring property or, enced by finer particles (Horner et al., 1990). A sec- in the worst case, a nearby stream or wetland. As sedi- ond finding is that silt fences are less effective on ment-laden runoff flows through the silt fence, the pores steeper slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fence Installation Guidelines
    Silt Fence Installation Guidelines Sediment Control QUALITY - SUPPORT - EXPERTISE Silt Fence Installation Guidelines 2 00m m de ep 200mm STEP 1 STEP 2 Installation STEP 1 Excavate a trench a minimum of 200mm wide and 200mm deep on STEP 3 the uphill side of the proposed line of silt fence. STEP 2 Drive adequate length support posts to a depth (minimum 400mm) appropriate for the site conditions downhill of the trench. A. Post spacing is typically at 2m centres with wire attached along the top between posts to assist with support of the silt fence. B. Post spacing can be increased up to 4m centres if supported by 2.5mm diameter high tensile wire at mid height and along the top 600mm with hog rings, clips or pins every 150mm connecting the silt fence along the top wire. STEP 3 Roll out silt fence and position up against the support posts and fold over top wire. Hog rings, clips or pins are used to attach the silt fence to the top wire (at the required spacing). STEP 4 STEP 4 Bury bottom section along the base and up the side of the trench leaving a minimum exposed height of 600mm and backfill with soil. Compact to ensure good anchorage. Place safety caps on posts. NOTE Installation to follow your local Regional Council guidelines for erosion control and sediment control. Maintenance Regular inspection of silt fence is required especially after each rainfall event. Make any necessary repairs and remove excessive silt deposits to reduce pressure on the silt fence. NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND HAMILTON NAPIER CHRISTCHURCH (64) 9 634 6495 (64) 21 732 178 (64) 21 916 736 (64) 3 349 5600 MELBOURNE SYDNEY NEWCASTLE COFFS HARBOUR PERTH ADELAIDE AUSTRALIA (03) 8586 9111 (02) 8785 8800 (02) 4951 2688 (02) 6653 5706 (08) 6305 0561 (08) 8162 5855 HOBART BRISBANE TOWNSVILLE BUNDABERG GOLD COAST DARWIN (03) 6273 0511 (07) 3279 1588 (07) 4774 8222 (07) 4155 9968 (07) 5594 8600 0407 523 669 0800 60 60 20 (Freephone NZ only) Follow GEOFABRICS.CO.NZ Geofabrics on GEOFABRICS.COM.AU The information contained in this brochure is general in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD
    SPECIFICATIONS & DRAWINGS (Purchase Order - For Construction Contract) Solicitation Number W9128F21Q0018 ____________________________________________________________ Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD March 2021 US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. AUDUBON BEND GRAVEL ROAD REPAIR GAVINS POINT DAM, SD PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS 00 10 00-3 PRICING SCHEDULE STATEMENT OF WORK 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS (SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS)FOR PURCHASE ORDERS DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 22 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES 01 41 26.02 24 (NEBRASKA) NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES 01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DRAWINGS -- End of Project Table of Contents -- Page 1 This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repairs, Gavins Point Dam, NE GP82 SECTION 00 10 00 PRICING SCHEDULE CLIN DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT BASE ITEMS 0001 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 JOB XXX $_______________ Blade entire length of road surface prior to placing gravel to smooth out 0002 1 JOB XXX $_______________ scour holes, rebuild crown. Includes areas over culverts. – 4,750 FEET Reset existing 24’’ CMP with flared 0003 ends to properly drain to North East – 1 JOB XXX $_______________ 1 EACH. Install new USACE provided 48’’ 0004 culvert with flared end (includes trees’ 1 JOB XXX $_______________ removal as necessary) – 1 EACH. Reconstruct approximately 270’ of 0005 eroded road at the existing culvert 720 CY $_______________ $_______________ (includes sodding and seeding).
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fences Allow Sediment to Settle from Runoff Before Water Leaves the Construction Site
    Silt Fence SC-1 BMP Objectives ○ Soil Stabilization ● Sediment Control ○ Tracking Control ○ Wind Erosion Control ○ Non-Storm Water Management ○ Materials and Waste Management Definition and Purpose A silt fence is a temporary linear sediment barrier of permeable fabric designed to intercept and slow the flow of sediment-laden sheet flow runoff. Silt fences allow sediment to settle from runoff before water leaves the construction site. Appropriate Applications Silt fences are placed: n Below the toe of exposed and erodible slopes. n Down-slope of exposed soil areas. n Around temporary stockpiles. n Along streams and channels. Limitations n Not effective unless trenched and keyed in. n Not intended for use as mid-slope protection on slopes greater than 4:1. n Must be maintained to remain effective. n Not intended for use in streams, channels, or anywhere flow is concentrated. n Difficult to install and maintain in windy areas. n Must be removed and disposed of. 70 Design Guidelines and Considerations n Do not use below slopes subject to creep, slumping, or landslides. n Do not use in streams, channels, or anywhere flow is concentrated. n Do not use silt fences to divert flow. n The maximum length of slope upgradient of the silt fence should be 60 m (200 ft) or less to minimize flow volumes and velocities and increase the effectiveness of the silt fence. n Slope of areas draining to fence should be less than 1:1 but can be used below steeper slopes at the Engineers discretion. n Limit to locations suitable for temporary ponding or deposition of sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Straw Wattles
    EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PRODUCT OVERVIEW Straw Wattles Straw wattles are an effective and economical Straw wattles are available in two sizes: alternative to silt fence and straw bales for • 9 inch (22.86 cm) diameter sediment control and storm water runoff. • 12 inch (30.48 cm) diameter Cylinders of recycled, compressed, 100% agricultural straw, straw wattles are wrapped in Advantages of Straw Wattles tubular, UV-stabilized black synthetic netting. • Increased weight per linear foot for less Straw wattles can be placed and staked along resistance to movement from wind, water and the contour of newly constructed or disturbed sediment load. slopes. Fertile topsoil, organic matter, and native • Low-cost solution to sheet and rill erosion seeds are trapped behind straw wattles and problems. provide a stable medium for germination. Straw • Replaces silt fence or straw bales on steep wattles also retain moisture from rainfall, aiding slopes. the growth of tree seedlings planted to their up- • Lasts up to two years. slope side. • Stores moisture for vegetation planted immediately up-slope. • The straw incorporates into the soil over time, adding organic material to the soil and retaining moisture for vegetation. • Can be staked with fascines to stabilize low- velocity stream banks and establish wetland plants. Straw Wattles Applications for Straw Wattles The Nilex Advantage • Control stormwater runoff. Diverts flow and Nilex is committed to unearthing better directs stormwater to treatment areas. results. Whether it’s for a civil, resource or • Prevent off-site sedimentation at active environmental project, we offer the latest construction sites. Keeps soil on-site and engineered and technically superior materials prevents it from washing onto pavement and techniques to save our customers time and asphalt; an economical and effective and money, and minimize the need to move or perimeter control alternative to silt fence and remove earth, and reduce the need for granular straw bales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control
    Presented at GRI-25, Geosynthetics Research Institute, Long Beach, CA, 2013 THE EVOLUTION OF GEOSYNTHETICS IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL C. Joel Sprague TRI/Environmental, Inc., Greenville, SC ABSTRACT Much of the development of geosynthetics technology in environmental applications has been in response to government regulations. This is certainly true for geosynthetics used in erosion and sediment control. Geosynthetics continue to replace traditional materials such as soil and stone in performing important engineering functions in erosion and sediment control applications while simultaneously introducing greater versatility and cost-effectiveness. Geosynthetics are widely used as a “carrier” for degradable materials to the enhancement of vegetative establishment; as nondegradable materials to extend the erosion control limits of vegetation or soil; as primary slope or channel linings; as components in silt fences and turbidity curtains; and as a component in an ever growing array of sediment retention devices. Along with the introduction of geosynthetics into this wide range of applications has come the need for industry-wide initiatives to promote their correct use and new test methods to characterize them. All of which, are a “work in progress”. THE NEED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS Much of the development of geosynthetics technology related to erosion and sediment control applications has been in response to government regulations. A progression of regulatory actions has brought a national focus on erosion and sediment control, including: Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1985) - eliminating discharge of any pollutant to navigable waters. The Clean Water Act (1987) - requiring National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for large construction sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fence (1056)
    Silt Fence (1056) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Standard I. Definition IV. Federal, State, and Local Laws Silt fence is a temporary sediment barrier of Users of this standard shall be aware of entrenched permeable geotextile fabric designed applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, to intercept and slow the flow of sediment-laden regulations, or permit requirements governing sheet flow runoff from small areas of disturbed the use and placement of silt fence. This soil. standard does not contain the text of federal, state, or local laws. II. Purpose V. Criteria The purpose of this practice is to reduce slope length of the disturbed area and to intercept and This section establishes the minimum standards retain transported sediment from disturbed areas. for design, installation and performance requirements. III. Conditions Where Practice Applies A. Placement A. This standard applies to the following applications: 1. When installed as a stand-alone practice on a slope, silt fence shall be placed on 1. Erosion occurs in the form of sheet and the contour. The parallel spacing shall rill erosion1. There is no concentration not exceed the maximum slope lengths of water flowing to the barrier (channel for the appropriate slope as specified in erosion). Table 1. 2. Where adjacent areas need protection Table 1. from sediment-laden runoff. Slope Fence Spacing 3. Where effectiveness is required for one < 2% 100 feet year or less. 2 to 5% 75 feet 5 to 10% 50 feet 4. Where conditions allow for silt fence to 10 to 33% 25 feet be properly entrenched and staked as > 33% 20 feet outlined in the Criteria Section V.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Checklist
    Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan Checklist Page 1 of 4 What is an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan? Erosion and sediment control is much more than silt fence and hay bales. Prior to developing an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan (EPSCP), it is important to have minimized the areas of disturbed soils and the duration of exposure. It is also imperative to control water at up- slope site perimeters, control water on-site, control sediment on-site, and control sediment at the downslope site perimeters. An EPSCP is the final element in the erosion and sediment control planning process and a necessary component of an Act 250 permit application. The EPSCP ensures that sediment transport is addressed in one of the most crucial stages of the project: the planning stage. A good erosion prevention and sediment control plan first minimizes the extent of disturbance by focusing on erosion control (minimizing disturbed areas, seeding, mulching, matting) by controlling the amount of soil that can run off and by stabilizing exposed soil. Sediment control measures (i.e. stabilized construction entrances) then focus on any sediment that has escaped your erosion control measures. Erosion prevention measures are far more effective than sediment control measures (such as silt fence) and should be the primary focus of any EPSCP. An EPSCP has five primary components: 1. Location map (USGS and other) 2. Existing conditions site plan 3. Grading plan and construction timetable 4. Erosion prevention and sediment control site plan and timetable 5. Narrative briefly describing the four plans The location map shows the proximity of the site to any surface water bodies, roads, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan FFY 2016-2020
    WISCONSIN’S Wisconsin’s NONPOINT SOURCE approach to addressing water quality impacts from PROGRAM nonpoint source MANAGEMENT PLAN pollution. FFY 2016-2020 Approved by EPA on September 18, 2015 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Table of Contents Acronyms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 The State of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in Wisconsin ..................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Monitoring and Assessment ....................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3 Watershed Planning for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control ...................................................... 30 Chapter 4 Statewide Implementation Program for Protection & Improvement of NPS Impacted Waters .. 57 Chapter 5 Tracking, Evaluation & Reporting............................................................................................... 84 Chapter 6 Future Directions - Through FFY 2020 .................................................................................... 106 2 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Acronyms & Abbreviations Agencies, Departments and Organizations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FSA Farm Service Agency (part of USDA) FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service LCD County Land Conservation Department LWCD County Land and Water Conservation Department
    [Show full text]
  • Silt Fences: an Economical Technique for Measuring Hillslope Soil Erosion
    United States Department of Agriculture Silt Fences: An Economical Technique Forest Service for Measuring Hillslope Soil Erosion Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Peter R. Robichaud Report RMRS-GTR-94 Robert E. Brown August 2002 Robichaud, Peter R.; Brown, Robert E. 2002. Silt fences: an economical technique for measuring hillslope soil erosion. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-94. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p. Abstract—Measuring hillslope erosion has historically been a costly, time-consuming practice. An easy to install low-cost technique using silt fences (geotextile fabric) and tipping bucket rain gauges to measure onsite hillslope erosion was developed and tested. Equipment requirements, installation procedures, statis- tical design, and analysis methods for measuring hillslope erosion are discussed. The use of silt fences is versatile; various plot sizes can be used to measure hillslope erosion in different settings and to determine effectiveness of various treatments or practices. Silt fences are installed by making a sediment trap facing upslope such that runoff cannot go around the ends of the silt fence. The silt fence is folded to form a pocket for the sediment to settle on and reduce the possibility of sediment undermining the silt fence. Cleaning out and weighing the accumulated sediment in the field can be accomplished with a portable hanging or plat- form scale at various time intervals depending on the necessary degree of detail in the measurement of erosion (that is, after every storm, quarterly, or seasonally). Silt fences combined with a tipping bucket rain gauge provide an easy, low-cost method to quantify precipitation/hillslope erosion relationships.
    [Show full text]