DOCSLIB.ORG

Indianacounty Act167 Phase1 F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indianacounty Act167 Phase1 F INDIANA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ACT 167 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PHASE I, SCOPE OF STUDY Indiana County, Pennsylvania March 2015 801 Water Street • Indiana, Pennsylvania 15701 • P:724.465.3150 • F:724.465.3150 Indiana County Phase 1 Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan Scope of Study ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The framework for Indiana County Phase I Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan was crafted by the following individuals and organizations. Indiana County Board of Commissioners Rodney D. Ruddock, Chairman Michael A. Baker Patricia A. Evanko Robin Maryai, Chief Clerk Michael T. Clark, Solicitor Indiana County Planning Commission Ed Nehrig, Chairman Delbert Highlands E Martin Nupp, Jr. John Somonick Laurie Lafontaine William Cornman Gary Fulton James Parson Ross Bricklemyer Thomas Rivosecchi, Solicitor Indiana County Office of Planning & Development (ICOPD) Byron G. Stauffer, Jr., Executive Director Jerry W. Richardson, Assistant Director LuAnn Zak, Deputy Director, Community Development & Housing Nicholas R. Rado, Deputy Director, Permitting & Facilities Management Jeff Raykes AICP, Deputy Director, Planning Angela M. Campisano, Chief, Economic Development David A. Morrow, Chief, Community Development & Housing Teresa L. Bachy, Chief Fiscal Zachary Norwood, Chief Planner George R. Urban, Planning Specialist James L. Roach, Development Technician III Roy Ribblett, Development Technician III Denise Remy, Fiscal Officer Dana P. Henry, Economic Development Specialist Christina L. Coleman, Department Clerk V Carla A. Minarcin, Department Clerk V Students from Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Department of Geography and Regional Planning who assisted with the development of the Plan through the ICOPD’s Student Planner Program: Jessica Bruckhart Crew Newcomer Indiana County Conservation District Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Adam Cotchen, District Manager Erin Kepple, Water Resource Manager Brooke Esarey, Watershed Specialist Sarah Koenig, Water Resource Planner Indiana County Phase 1 Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan Scope of Study ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Watershed Planning Advisory Committee (WPAC) Over 40 residents, with varied backgrounds and interests, volunteered to serve as members of the Watershed Planning Advisory Committee (WPAC) for Indiana County Phase I Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan. The leadership of this group was instrumental in the development of this Plan. PJ Ackerson John Ferraro Dennis Remy Chris Anderson Joanne Ferraro Cindy Rogers Tom Baltz Jeff Fliss Dr. Chris Schaney Rob Barto Dennis Hawley Gail Smith Mike Bertolino Larry Henry Dave Smyers Vera Bonnet Mike Holiday John Somonick Tom Borellis PJ Hruska Timothy Stewart James Brendlinger Bob Kossak Terry Stiffler William Burba Don Lancaster Tom Stutzman Jennifer Christman Anthony Mano Dana Turgeon John Dudash Pam Meade Patty Yamrick Mike Duffalo Rob Nymick Dr. Robert Eppley David Osgood Brooke Esarey David Overdorff Tim Evans Tracy Pearce Indiana County Phase 1 Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan Scope of Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................1 Purpose 1 Stormwater Runoff Problems and Solutions 1 Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act (Act 167) 2 Act 167 Planning for Indiana County 3 Plan Benefits 3 Stormwater Management Planning Approach 4 Previous Stormwater Management and Related Planning Efforts 5 2. GENERAL COUNTY DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................5 Political Jurisdictions 5 NPDES Phase II Involvement 6 General Development Patterns 6 Land Use 8 Physiography 8 Soils 10 Water Resources 10 PA Chapter 93 Stream Classifications 15 Impaired Waterways 15 Dams and Impoundments 18 Abandoned Mine Discharge 20 Floodplains 20 Climate 20 3. ACT 167 PLANNING FOR INDIANA COUNTY, PHASE I PLANNING PROCESS ......................................... 20 Indiana County/ Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Joint Efforts 21 PADEP and Indiana County Letter of Intent (LOI) 21 Survey Creation and Distribution 21 Watershed Plan Advisory Committee (WPAC) 22 WPAC Meetings 24 4. INDIANA COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS .................................................... 24 Stormwater Problem Prioritization 25 Modeling Needs Assessment 26 5. PHASE II SCOPE DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 27 General Workplan 32 6. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 34 APPENDICES MAPS Appendix A - Stormwater Survey Form Map 2.1 - Project Area Appendix B - Stormwater Survey Summary Map 2.2 - Existing Land Use Appendix C - Phase II Scope of Work Map 2.3 - Indiana County Watersheds Basins Appendix D - Proposed Phase II Schedule Map 2.4 - Indiana County Watersheds Appendix E - PADEP Letter of Intent Map 2.5 - Local Designations and Act 167 Watersheds Map 2.6 - Indiana County Dam Locations Map 4.1 - Indiana County Stormwater Problem Areas and Development Pressures Map 4.2 - Future Land Use Map 4.3 - Indiana County Modeling Needs Assessment Indiana County Phase 1 Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan Scope of Study 1. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Indiana County Office of Planning & Development and the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission worked together to produce a Phase I Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for the County. This report presents the results of the Phase I planning effort. There are three key components contained in this report. These include 1) a summary of Indiana County watershed characteristics (Section 2), 2) an inventory of existing stormwater problems in the County (Section 4), and 3) a proposed project scope, schedule and budget for completion of the Phase II of the Indiana County Stormwater Management Plan (Section 5). STORMWATER RUNOFF PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS Stormwater occurs when any precipitation, rain or snow melt, runs over the surface and into a body of water. Impervious surfaces, such as roads, parking lots, roof tops, and compacted land, do not allow for any stormwater infiltration into the ground. The presence of impervious surfaces results in an increase in the volume and rate of stormwater runoff and can also negatively impact water quality in local waterways. Increased volumes and rates of stormwater can cause a variety of problems, such as erosion, infrastructure damage, more frequent flooding events, and lack of groundwater recharge. Stormwater negatively impacts water quality in a variety of ways, including: discharging non-point source pollution such as trash, oils, heavy metals, bacteria, and nutrients to local waterways; sedimentation; and increased stream temperatures. The effects of stormwater runoff are directly related to development. Conventional development practices include creating large amounts of impervious surfaces and clearing native vegetation. Historically, development was viewed as an independent project, tied to a single plot of land, and it only affected that area. However, the outcome of an individual project can affect everyone downstream in the watershed. Stormwater management is critical to preserve our local waterways, drinking water sources, and to avoid economic damages to infrastructure. Watersheds do not follow political boundaries, so in order to manage stormwater, a comprehensive approach needs to be taken. Employing best management practices (BMPs) can prevent and mitigate problems related to stormwater. BMPs include mechanisms that control the volume, rate, and quality of stormwater. BMPs also include practices that prevent the creation of stormwater runoff and stormwater pollution. The most effective time to incorporate BMPs is during site planning, design, and development. This allows the opportunity to utilize non-structural BMPs, which are BMPs that prevent and/or minimize stormwater runoff. Structural BMPs, which are engineered systems designed to mitigate the impacts of stormwater runoff, can be incorporated during development or in retrofit situations. Coupling non-structural and structural BMPs during site development can greatly minimize stormwater problems while also increasing the marketability of a site. Indiana County Phase 1 Act 167 1 Stormwater Management Plan Scope of Study PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ACT (ACT 167) Since it is clear that stormwater runoff is a serious and growing problem, the Pennsylvania General Assembly enacted Act 167 in 1978. Act 167 clearly defines the close relationship between development, increased runoff, and floodplain management. Specifically, this statement of legislative findings points out that: 1. Inadequate management of accelerated stormwater runoff resulting from development throughout a watershed increases flood flows and velocity, contributes to erosion and sedimentation, overtaxes the carrying capacity of streams and storm sewers, greatly increases the cost of public facilities to carry and control stormwater, undermines floodplain management and floodplain control efforts in downstream communities, reduces groundwater recharge, and threatens public health and safety. 2. A comprehensive program of stormwater management, including reasonable regulation of development and activities causing accelerated runoff, is fundamental to the public health, safety, welfare, and the protection of the people of the Commonwealth, their resources, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pohick Creek Watershed Management Plan Are Included in This Section
    Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies 5.0 Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies The Pohick Creek Watershed is divided into ten smaller watershed management areas (WMAs) based on terrain. Summaries of Pohick Creek’s ten WMAs are listed in the following WMA sections, including field reconnaissance findings, existing and future land use, stream conditions and stormwater infrastructure. For Fairfax County planning and management purposes the WMAs have been further subdivided into smaller subwatersheds. These areas, typically 100 – 300 acres, were used as the basic units for modeling and other evaluations. Each WMA was examined at the subwatershed level in order to capture as much data as possible. The subwatershed conditions were reviewed and problem areas were highlighted. Projects were proposed in problematic subwatersheds. The full Pohick Creek Draft Watershed Workbook, which contains detailed watershed characterizations, can be found in the Technical Appendices. Pohick Creek has four major named tributaries (see Map 3-1.1 in Chapter 3). In the northern portions of the watershed two main tributaries converge into Pohick Creek stream. The Rabbit Branch tributary begins in the highly developed areas of George Mason University and Fairfax City, while Sideburn Branch tributary begins in the highly developed area southwest of George Mason University. The confluence of these two headwater tributaries forms the Pohick Creek main stem. The Middle Run tributary drains Huntsman Lake and moderately-developed residential areas. The South Run tributary drains Burke Lake and Lake Mercer, as well as the low-density southwestern portion of the watershed. The restoration strategies proposed to be implemented within the next ten years (0 – 10-year plan) consist of 90 structural projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Adams County Conservation District
    Highlights of Conservation District Activities 2017 Presented by PACD Adams County Conservation District 2017 Feature Accomplishments Other Accomplishments Dirt, Gravel & Low Volume Road Maintenance Program Contact Information • Performed 265 E & S inspections with Resource Challenge 85% compliance Sediment is the largest pollutant by volume to the waters of the • Re-assessed 10 streams to upgrade Sherri Clayton-Williams Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Unpaved roads not only Interim District Manager stream designation and protective uses. generate sediment, but also act as collectors for runoff and • Sponsored the Adams County sediment from adjacent land uses resulting in increased flood Envirothon programs involving 104 Charles Bennett flows in streams, and transport of sediment and other pollutant Board Chairman middle school students and 60 high into local waterways. school students • Installed 3 acres of riparian buffers Project Summary and Results 670 Old Harrisburg Road, Suite 201 through community volunteer projects. Technical assistance and funding to install driving surface Gettysburg, PA 17325 • Installed agricultural BMPs including 21 aggregate, new culverts, underdrains, ditching, and stormwater (717) 334-0636 waterways, 2 diversions and 3 terraces management to address problems on local roads that www.adamscounty.us • Provided technical assistance on EQIP adversely affect water quality. • Six project sites completed in 2017- $229,703.48 projects that brought an additional More Work to Do $232,767.00 into Adams County • Three
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia
    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, 4 p., 1 pl. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Amd Inventory in Wv
    AMD INVENTORY IN WV Ben B. Faulkner ABSTRACT Recent sampling and aquatic habitat evaluation by many entities has indicated that despite a long history of negative influence by acid mine drainage, many streams and rivers in West Virginia are improving in quality. AMD continues to negatively impact streams in many areas of the state, but a combined effort industry, state, and federal concerns to control AMD at active mine sites, bond forfeitures, and abandoned mine lands has resulted in improved fisheries and restored water uses. Effective chemical treatment and watershed improvement efforts utilizing passive technologies have been the primary cause of this trend. Active mine sites, bond forfeiture sites, and AML projects dealing with AMD are inventoried for location and extent. Trends in AMD affected watersheds are presented. INTRODUCTION For many years at this symposium and at other venues, much discussion has been made about the extent, nature, and solution for acid mine drainage (AMD). Acid mine drainage research began prior to this century (Gleason 1976). Evaluation of the efficacy of acid mine drainage abatement measures is difficult.. Even empirical analytical data may not reflect the actual measure of success of a mitigative endeavor. Most technical papers present a substantial amount of analytical data at a specific site prior to and after the water quality mitigation effort. However, the real indicator of mine drainage mitigation is restored or preserved habitat and water uses in receiving streams. I should like to present an overview of the AMD problem in West Virginia. Rather than explore the technical intricacies of AMD formation and mitigation, l would rather discuss the extent, nature, and trends of AMD in the Mountain State.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was made possible by the support of the following organizations and individuals: Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center West Virginia Assistive Technology System (WVATS) West Virginia Division of Natural Resources West Virginia Division of Tourism Partnerships in Assistive Technologies, Inc. (PATHS) Special thanks to Stephen K. Hardesty and Brittany Valdez for their enthusiasm while working on this Guide. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 3 • How to Use This Guide ......................................... 4 • ADA Sites .............................................................. 5 • Types of Fish ......................................................... 7 • Traveling in West Virginia ...................................... 15 COUNTY INDEX .......................................................... 19 ACTIVITY LISTS • Public Access Sites ............................................... 43 • Lakes ..................................................................... 53 • Trout Fishing ......................................................... 61 • River Float Trips .................................................... 69 SITE INDEX ................................................................. 75 SITE DESCRIPTIONS .................................................. 83 APPENDICES A. Recreation Organizations ......................................207 B. Trout Stocking Schedule .......................................209
    [Show full text]
  • City of Dover 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
    City of Dover 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City of Dover, Delaware Planning for a Bigger Better Dover FINAL DRAFT ISSUED - 12.3.2019 2019 Comprehensive Plan The City of Dover Acknowledgements Mayor: Robin R. Christiansen City Manager: Donna S. Mitchell Assistant City Manager: Matthew Harline City Council: William F. Hare Planning Commission: Nicholas Adams Matthew J. Lindell Kathleen Welsh Tanner Wm. Polce John H. Baldwin, Sr. Timothy A. Slavin Andrea B. Maucher, Vice Chair Ralph L. Taylor Jr. Bobby C. Jones, Chair Scott W. Cole Kenneth Roach Fred A. Neil Deborah L. Edwards David L. Anderson Fred Tolbert Roy Sudler Jr. Robert D. Hartman Thomas Holt-Retired 8/2019 City of Dover Historic District Commission: Joseph McDaniel Ann Baker Horsey Eric S. Czerwinski Jonathan N.H. Street Mary Terry Mason The 2019 Dover Comprehensive Plan Project Team: City of Dover Planning Staff: David S. Hugg III, Director of Planning & Inspections Dawn Melson-Williams, AICP, Principal Planner Eddie Diaz, AICP, (Former Planner II) Julian Swierczek, Planner Tracey Harvey, Planner & CDBG Program Administrator Samantha, Bulkilvish, Planner I Maretta Savage-Purnell, Secretary II City of Dover Department of Public Works: Sharon J. Duca, P.E, Public Works Director Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director City of Dover GIS Staff: Mark Nowak, GIS Coordinator Jeremy Gibb, GIS Technician City of Dover Electric Department: Paul Waddell, Engineering Services & System Operations Superintendent Jim Robinson, Former Electric Director City of Dover Parks & Recreation:
    [Show full text]
  • Class a Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class
    Class A Wild Trout Waters Created: August 16, 2021 Definition of Class A Waters: Streams that support a population of naturally produced trout of sufficient size and abundance to support a long-term and rewarding sport fishery. Management: Natural reproduction, wild populations with no stocking. Definition of Ownership: Percent Public Ownership: the percent of stream section that is within publicly owned land is listed in this column, publicly owned land consists of state game lands, state forest, state parks, etc. Important Note to Anglers: Many waters in Pennsylvania are on private property, the listing or mapping of waters by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission DOES NOT guarantee public access. Always obtain permission to fish on private property. Percent Lower Limit Lower Limit Length Public County Water Section Fishery Section Limits Latitude Longitude (miles) Ownership Adams Carbaugh Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Carbaugh Reservoir pool 39.871810 -77.451700 1.50 100 Adams East Branch Antietam Creek 1 Brook Headwaters to Waynesboro Reservoir inlet 39.818420 -77.456300 2.40 100 Adams-Franklin Hayes Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 31 Bedford Bear Run 1 Brook Headwaters to Mouth 40.207730 -78.317500 0.77 100 Bedford Ott Town Run 1 Brown Headwaters to Mouth 39.978611 -78.440833 0.60 0 Bedford Potter Creek 2 Brown T 609 bridge to Mouth 40.189160 -78.375700 3.30 0 Bedford Three Springs Run 2 Brown Rt 869 bridge at New Enterprise to Mouth 40.171320 -78.377000 2.00 0 Bedford UNT To Shobers Run (RM 6.50) 2 Brown
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-02-02 010515__2021 Stocking Schedule All.Pdf
    Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 2021 Trout Stocking Schedule (as of 2/1/2021, visit fishandboat.com/stocking for changes) County Water Sec Stocking Date BRK BRO RB GD Meeting Place Mtg Time Upper Limit Lower Limit Adams Bermudian Creek 2 4/6/2021 X X Fairfield PO - SR 116 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 2 3/15/2021 X X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 CRANBERRY ROAD BRIDGE (SR1014) Wierman's Mill Road Bridge (SR 1009) Adams Bermudian Creek 4 3/15/2021 X X York Springs Fire Company Community Center 10:00 GREENBRIAR ROAD BRIDGE (T-619) SR 94 BRIDGE (SR0094) Adams Conewago Creek 3 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 3 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 SR0234 BRDG AT ARENDTSVILLE 200 M DNS RUSSELL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) Adams Conewago Creek 4 4/22/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 10/6/2021 X X Letterkenny Reservoir 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 4 2/27/2021 X X X Adams Co. National Bank-Arendtsville 10:00 200 M DNS RUSSEL TAVERN RD BRDG (T-340) RT 34 BRDG (SR0034) Adams Conewago Creek 5 4/22/2021 X X Adams Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Guide
    TROUT STOCKING Rivers and Streams Trout Stocking Code No. Stockings .........Period Code No. Stockings .........Period Code No. Stockings .........Period River or Stream: County Code: Area Q One .................... 1st week of March One ................................... February CR Varies .................................... Varies BW South Branch of the Potomac River: W-F: from 0.5 miles north of the Virginia line downstream (about 20 miles) to approximately One .....................................January M One each month .....February-May Pendleton (Franklin Section) 2 miles south of Upper Tract, near the old Poor Farm One every two weeks ..... March-May W Two................................... February MJ One each month ..... January-April South Branch of the Potomac River: One .....................................January Pendleton (Smoke Hole Section) W-F: from U.S. Route 220 bridge downstream to Big Bend Recreation Area One each week .............March-May BA Y One ...........................................April One ........................................ March One................................ The two weeks after Tilhance Creek: Berkeley BW: from one mile below Johnstown upstream 3 miles to state secondary Route 9/7 bridge X After April 1 or area is open to public F Columbus Day week Trout Run: Hardy W: from mouth at Wardensville upstream 7 miles Tuscarora Creek: Berkeley BW: from Martinsburg upstream 5 miles Trout Stocking River or Stream: County Waites Run: Hardy W: from state Route 55 bridge at Wardensville upstream 6.5 miles Code: Area Big Bullskin Run: Jefferson W: from near Wheatland 5 miles downstream to Kabletown Dillons Run: Hampshire BW: from state secondary Route 50/25 bridge upstream 4 miles Evitts Run: Jeferson W-F: from the Charles Town Park upstream to a point 0.5 miles west of town, along state Route 51 W-F: Lost City and Lost River bridges and downstream along state Route 259 to one mile above Lost River: Hardy the U.S.
    [Show full text]