DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C Text Appendix C Inventory of West Virginia Lakes Appendix C: Inventory of West Virginia Lakes SURFACE NORMAL STATE ID DAM NAME CODE AREA (acres) STORAGE (acre feet) Barbour 00101 TETER CREEK LAKE DAM # 1 Public 26.00 315 00102 BELINGTON WATER SUPPLY DAM Public 11.00 77 Totals 37.00 392 Berkeley 00301 SLEEPY CREEK DAM Public 225 2460 00302 CHERRY RUN LAKE PRIVATE 2 10 00303 SLEEPY HOLLOW CREEK DAM PRIVATE 8 104 00304 DUPONT WASTE RETENTION PRIVATE 00305 R. P. SMITH POWER STATION PRIVATE 12 239 00306 WHITE'S RUN NO. 1 DAM PRIVATE 00307 TILHANCE FARMS PRIVATE 00308 R. PAUL SMITH # 3 DAM PRIVATE Totals 247.00 2813.00 Boone 00507 FORK CREEK PUBLIC HUNTING Public 11 Totals 11 Braxton 00702 SALT LICK CREEK NO. 4 DAM PRIVATE 6 26 00703 SALT LICK CREEK NO. 6 DAM PRIVATE 4.00 19.00 00704 SALT LICK CREEK NO. 7 DAM PRIVATE 4.00 30.00 00705 SALT LICK CREEK NO. 8 DAM PRIVATE 8.00 55.00 00706 SALT LICK CREEK NO. 9 DAM PRIVATE 16.00 100.00 BURNSVILLE LAKE Public 968.00 14360.00 SUTTON LAKE Public 1500.00 64140.00 Totals 2506.00 78730.00 Brooke 00901 HARMON CREEK #1 PRIVATE 5.00 33.00 00902 HARMON CREEK NO. 3 DAM PRIVATE 2.00 9.00 00903 HARMON CREEK NO. 4 DAM PRIVATE 2.00 14.00 00905 BOWDEN MEMORIAL LAKE PRIVATE 00906 HARMON CREEK #6 DAM PRIVATE 00907 HARMON CREEK # 7 PRIVATE 00908 HARMON CREEK #13 PRIVATE 2.00 13.00 00909 HARMON CREEK NO. 14 DAM PRIVATE 5.00 36.00 00910 HARMON CREEK NO. 2 DAM PRIVATE 3.00 26.00 00915 BUREK FARM POND PRIVATE 00916 CASTLEMAN'S RUN LAKE NO. 1 Public 24.00 233.00 Totals 43.00 364.00 Cabell 01101 CULLODEN WATER SUPPLY DAM Public 13.00 54.00 01102 LAKE OF EDEN PRIVATE 3.00 17.00 01103 MELODY T RANCH LAKE PRIVATE 4.00 42.00 01104 LAKEVIEW DAM PRIVATE 2.40 35.00 01105 HATFIELD FARM LAKE PRIVATE 3.00 29.00 01106 PERRY MOUNTAIN LAKE PRIVATE 2.00 8.00 01107 TROUT LAKE Public 15.00 100.00 Totals 42.40 285.00 Clay 01501 UNION CARBIDE H & F CLUB #1 PRIVATE 12.00 52.00 Page C - 1 Appendix C: Inventory of West Virginia Lakes SURFACE NORMAL STATE ID DAM NAME CODE AREA (acres) STORAGE (acre feet) 01505 UNION CARBIDE NO. 2 DAM PRIVATE Totals 12.00 52.00 Doddridge 01701 CRYSTAL LAKE PRIVATE 27.00 162.00 Totals 27.00 162.00 Fayette 01901 GAULEY JUNCTION DAM PRIVATE 250.00 8500.00 01902 PLUM ORCHARD LAKE DAM Public 166.00 2578.00 01903 UN TRIB PLUM ORCHARD PRIVATE 32.00 01907 BABCOCK LAKE DAM Public 16.00 200.00 01911 GLEN FERRIS DAM PRIVATE 01912 CEDAR BRANCH DAM PRIVATE 100.00 Totals 432.00 11410.00 Grant 02301 MT. STORM LAKE DAM PRIVATE 1100.00 44000.00 02302 POND NO. #1 DAM PRIVATE 02303 NEW CREEK NO. 12 DAM PRIVATE 7.00 46.00 02304 NEW CREEK NO. 14 DAM PRIVATE 40.00 1100.00 02305 LUNICE CREEK NO. 9 PRIVATE 6.00 54.00 02306 LUNICE CREEK NO. 10 PRIVATE 6.00 54.00 02307 LUNICE CREEK NO. 11 PRIVATE 7.70 77.50 02308 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 1 DAM PRIVATE 14.00 75.00 02309 PATTERSON CREEK # 2 DAM PRIVATE 7.40 36.60 02310 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 3 DAM PRIVATE 7.10 35.20 02311 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 4 DAM PRIVATE 8.00 1989.00 02312 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 6 DAM PRIVATE 5.00 22.00 02313 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 12 DAM PRIVATE 15.00 96.00 02314 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 50 DAM PRIVATE 11.00 89.00 02315 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 41 DAM PRIVATE 26.00 5480.00 02316 PATTERSON CREEK NO. 49 DAM PRIVATE 7.00 32.00 02323 N&S MILL CREEK NO.16 PRIVATE 7.00 47.00 02324 N&S MILL CREEK NO. 3 DAM PRIVATE 7.00 91.00 02325 N&S MILL CREEK NO.4 PRIVATE 6.00 56.00 02329 MILL RUN WS DAM Public 12.00 02331 N & S MILL CREEK SITE NO. 7 PRIVATE 48.00 840.10 Totals 1347.20 54220.40 Greenbrier 02507 HOWARD CREEK DAM NO. 12 PRIVATE 39.00 459.00 Totals 39.00 459.00 Hampshire 02701 FERNDALE FARMS RECREATION LAKE PRIVATE 65.00 390.00 02702 ELKHORN LAKE PRIVATE 4.00 12.00 02703 COMPRESSOR LAKE PRIVATE 5.00 15.00 02704 SIMMINGTON LAKE DAM PRIVATE 3.00 10.00 02705 BOONE FARMS LAKE DAM PRIVATE 2.00 24.00 02706 CROOKED RUN LAKE DAM PRIVATE 2.00 15.00 02707 GOLDEN ACRES LAKE PRIVATE 3.00 14.00 02708 Wilson Big Hollow Dam PRIVATE Totals 84.00 480.00 Page C - 2 Appendix C: Inventory of West Virginia Lakes SURFACE NORMAL STATE ID DAM NAME CODE AREA (acres) STORAGE (acre feet) Hancock 02902 TOMLINSON LAKE DAM Public 30.00 325.00 02903 CHERRY LAKE DAM PRIVATE 4.00 02905 BISON LAKE DAM PRIVATE 02907 FRANKOVITCH DAM PRIVATE 1.00 Totals 34.00 326.00 Hardy 03101 WARDEN LAKE Public 36.00 382.00 03102 THORN BOTTOM FARM LAKE PRIVATE 43.00 149.00 03103 SOUTH FORK NO. 1 PRIVATE 96.00 03104 SOUTH FORK NO. 2 PRIVATE 58.00 03105 SOUTH FORK NO. 4 PRIVATE 9.90 181.00 03106 SOUTH FORK # 5 DAM PRIVATE 4.00 39.80 03108 LOST RIVER #4 DAM PRIVATE 66.00 605.00 03109 NORMAN WRATCHFORD LAKE PRIVATE 2.00 8.00 03110 LOST RIVER #27 DAM PRIVATE 03112 LOST RIVER #10 PRIVATE Totals 160.90 1518.80 Harrison 03301 UPPER SALEM DAM Public 22.00 450.00 03302 MEADOW VILLAGE POND PRIVATE 03304 CONSOLIDATED GAS CO. LAKE PRIVATE 3.00 24.00 03305 BUFFALO LAKE DAM PRIVATE 55.00 927.00 03306 JOYCE LAKE PRIVATE 3.00 79.00 03307 SALEM FORK NO.9 PRIVATE 4.00 13.00 03308 SALEM FORK NO.11 PRIVATE 2.00 63.00 03309 SALEM FORK NO.11A PRIVATE 2.00 3.00 03310 SALEM FORK #12 PRIVATE 2.00 2.00 03311 SALEM FORK #13 PRIVATE 2.00 3.00 03312 SALEM FORK #14 PRIVATE 2.00 32.00 03313 SALEM FORK NO.15 PRIVATE 1.00 2.00 03314 LOWER SALEM WS Public 13.00 145.00 03315 OLD LUMBERPORT DAM Public 5.14 57.00 03319 LAKE FLOYD DAM PRIVATE 31.00 271.00 03320 SHINNSTON WATER SUPPLY Public 0.00 03321 STONY LAKE DAM PRIVATE 03322 DEEGAN LAKE Public 18.00 163.00 03323 PALMER LAKE PRIVATE 4.00 22.00 03324 SALERNO DAM PRIVATE 2.00 5.00 03326 ORAL LAKE DAM PRIVATE 5.00 03327 MAPLE LAKE PRIVATE 20.00 250.00 03328 HINKLE LAKE Public 6.00 33.00 03329 WILDERNESS WATER PARK DAM PRIVATE 10.00 03330 NEW LUMBERPORT DAM Public 03331 WEST MILFORD DAM Public 337.00 03332 JOHN BELOTT'S POND PRIVATE 2.00 03333 Harrison Power Station Sediment Pond #1 PRIVATE 03334 HIGHLAND DAM 276.00 03335 TWO LICK DAM 138.00 03336 HARTLAND DAM 276.00 Page C - 3 Appendix C: Inventory of West Virginia Lakes SURFACE NORMAL STATE ID DAM NAME CODE AREA (acres) STORAGE (acre feet) Totals 214.14 3571.00 Jackson 03501 CEDAR LAKE DAM NO.1 Public 5.00 59.00 03502 CEDAR LAKE DAM NO.2 Public 2.00 19.00 03503 JACKSON CO. LIVESTOCK POND NO. 1 PRIVATE 3.00 15.00 03504 PAXTON FARM POND PRIVATE 1.00 6.00 03505 MARSHALL PARSONS FARM POND PRIVATE 1.00 8.00 03506 ALICE PARSONS FARM POND PRIVATE 2.00 9.00 03507 MARCHIO'S FARM POND PRIVATE 1.00 8.00 03508 H.C. FISHER FISHING LAKE NO.3 PRIVATE 3.00 14.00 03509 H.C. FISHER FISHING LAKE NO.4 PRIVATE 1.00 7.00 03510 RIPLEY FARM POND NO.1 PRIVATE 2.00 10.00 03511 RUBY LAKE PRIVATE 1.00 6.00 03512 HUTCHINSON FARM POND PRIVATE 1.00 48.00 03513 ROLLINS LAKE DAM NO.1 Public 36.00 143.00 03514 ROLLINS DAM NO.2 Public 143.00 03515 GREEN HILLS COUNTRY CLUB LAKE PRIVATE 1.00 5.00 03516 HALLS FARM POND PRIVATE 4.00 24.00 03519 TURKEY RUN LAKE Public 15.00 64.00 03520 WV BAPTIST CHURCH CAMP LAKE PRIVATE 5.00 30.00 03521 LITTLE HORSE LAKE PRIVATE 03522 MILL CREEK NO.4 PRIVATE 21.00 139.00 03523 MILL CREEK NO.5 PRIVATE 37.00 220.00 03524 MILL CREEK NO.8 PRIVATE 16.00 122.00 03525 MILL CREEK NO.13 PRIVATE 217.00 2623.00 03526 POCATALICO STRUCTURE NO.28 PRIVATE 244.00 4750.00 03527 MILL CREEK #9 PRIVATE 24.00 187.00 03528 MILL CREEK NO. 10 DAM PRIVATE 278.00 2792.00 Totals 921.00 11451.00 Jefferson 03701 SHANNONDALE CLUB LTD. PRIVATE 62.00 951.00 03702 KEYS FERRY ACRES LAKE NO.1 PRIVATE 2.00 12.00 03703 KEYS FERRY ACRES LAKE NO.2 PRIVATE 1.00 5.00 03704 KEYS FERRY ACRES LAKE NO.3 PRIVATE 1.00 3.00 03705 KEYS FERRY ACRES GOLF LAKE NO. 2 PRIVATE 4.00 21.00 03706 KEYS FERRY ACRES LAKE PRIVATE 3.00 8.00 03707 MILLVILLE DAM PRIVATE Totals 73.00 1000.00 Kanawha 03901 LAKE CHAWEVA DAM PRIVATE 24.00 200.00 03902 HOLZ DAM PRIVATE 5.00 80.00 03903 WARD IMPOUNDMENT (UPPER) DAM PRIVATE 43.60 3100.00 03904 POFFENBARGER DAM NO.1 PRIVATE 2.00 28.00 03905 ELK-TWO MILE NO.12 PRIVATE 2.00 16.00 03906 ELK-TWO MILE NO.13 PRIVATE 4.00 28.00 03907 LONDON LOCKS & DAM Public 700.00 03909 BLAKE'S CREEK SITE NO.7 PRIVATE 28.00 81.00 03912 POFFENBARGER FARM LAKE NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pohick Creek Watershed Management Plan Are Included in This Section
    Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies 5.0 Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies The Pohick Creek Watershed is divided into ten smaller watershed management areas (WMAs) based on terrain. Summaries of Pohick Creek’s ten WMAs are listed in the following WMA sections, including field reconnaissance findings, existing and future land use, stream conditions and stormwater infrastructure. For Fairfax County planning and management purposes the WMAs have been further subdivided into smaller subwatersheds. These areas, typically 100 – 300 acres, were used as the basic units for modeling and other evaluations. Each WMA was examined at the subwatershed level in order to capture as much data as possible. The subwatershed conditions were reviewed and problem areas were highlighted. Projects were proposed in problematic subwatersheds. The full Pohick Creek Draft Watershed Workbook, which contains detailed watershed characterizations, can be found in the Technical Appendices. Pohick Creek has four major named tributaries (see Map 3-1.1 in Chapter 3). In the northern portions of the watershed two main tributaries converge into Pohick Creek stream. The Rabbit Branch tributary begins in the highly developed areas of George Mason University and Fairfax City, while Sideburn Branch tributary begins in the highly developed area southwest of George Mason University. The confluence of these two headwater tributaries forms the Pohick Creek main stem. The Middle Run tributary drains Huntsman Lake and moderately-developed residential areas. The South Run tributary drains Burke Lake and Lake Mercer, as well as the low-density southwestern portion of the watershed. The restoration strategies proposed to be implemented within the next ten years (0 – 10-year plan) consist of 90 structural projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cacapon Settlement: 1749-1800 31
    THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 31 5 THE CACAPON SETTLEMENT: 1749-1800 The existence of a settlement of Brethren families in the Cacapon River Valley of eastern Hampshire County in present day West Virginia has been unknown and uninvestigated until the present time. That a congregation of Brethren existed there in colonial times cannot now be denied, for sufficient evidence has been accumulated to reveal its presence at least by the 1760s and perhaps earlier. Because at this early date, Brethren churches and ministers did not keep records, details of this church cannot be recovered. At most, contemporary researchers can attempt to identify the families which have the highest probability of being of Brethren affiliation. Even this is difficult due to lack of time and resources. The research program for many of these families is incomplete, and this chapter is offered tentatively as a basis for additional research. Some attempted identifications will likely be incorrect. As work went forward on the Brethren settlements in the western and southern parts of old Hampshire County, it became clear that many families in the South Branch, Beaver Run and Pine churches had relatives who had lived in the Cacapon River Valley. Numerous families had moved from that valley to the western part of the county, and intermarriages were also evident. Land records revealed a large number of family names which were common on the South Branch, Patterson Creek, Beaver Run and Mill Creek areas. In many instances, the names appeared first on the Cacapon and later in the western part of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Assistance to States Jennings Randolph Lake Scoping Study Phase II Report
    ~ ~ U. S. Army Corps Interstate Commission of Engineers on the Potomac River Basin Planning Assistance to States Jennings Randolph Lake Scoping Study Phase II Report APRIL 2020 Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Laura Felter and Julia Fritz and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Cherie Schultz, Claire Buchanan, and Gordon Michael Selckmann Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study Authority ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Congressional Authorizations and Project Objectives .................................................................. 3 1.4 Study Area Management .............................................................................................................. 4 2 Scoping Studies ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Watershed Conditions Analysis ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION of NATURAL RESOURCES ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012 Earl Ray Tomblin Governor, State of West Virginia
    Natural Resources DIVISION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012 Earl Ray Tomblin Governor, State of West Virginia Keith Burdette Secretary, Department of Commerce Frank Jezioro Director, Division of Natural Resources Emily J. Fleming Assistant to the Director / Legislative Liaison Bryan M. Hoffman Executive Secretary, Administration Section 324 4th Avenue South Charleston, West Virginia 25303 David E. Murphy Chief, Law Enforcement Section Telephone: 304-558-2754 Fax: 304-558-2768 Kenneth K. Caplinger Chief, Parks and Recreation Section Web sites: www.wvdnr.gov Curtis I. Taylor www.wvstateparks.com Chief, Wildlife Resources Section www.wvhunt.com www.wvfish.com Joe T. Scarberry www.wonderfulwv.com Supervisor, Land and Streams Electronic mail: Natural Resources Commissioners [email protected] Jeffrey S. Bowers, Sugar Grove [email protected] Byron K. Chambers, Romney [email protected] David M. Milne, Bruceton Mills [email protected] Peter L. Cuffaro, Wheeling David F. Truban, Morgantown Kenneth R. Wilson, Chapmanville Thomas O. Dotson, White Sulphur Springs The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources Annual Report 2011-2012 is published by the Division of Natural Resources and the Department of Commerce Communications. It is the policy of the Division of Natural Resources to provide its facilities, services, programs and employment opportunities to all persons without regard to sex, race, age, religion, national origin or ancestry, disability, or other protected group status. Foreword LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR Foreword i
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • W2's TOP TROUT WATERS
    W2’s TOP TROUT WATERS Where To Go When You Want The Best... tions prior to making your first cast often makestions prior to making your first the difference. cast often A bove - Taking several moments to access stream and rivercondi and stream access to moments several Taking - bove TROUT FISHING SPECIAL BY C.C. MCCOTTER South Branch. This is the one issue of the year W2 focus- A quick look at West Virginia Gazetteer reveals the South es on the great tradition of trout fishing. Branch flows northeast between some serious mountains. While our region might not offer truly world class venues, it The best section, known as the Smoke Hole, near the Town does have some notable destinations and fisheries. Some are of Upper Tract on Route 220, is particularly noted as a trophy remote and some are in the heart of the cities. trout water. For anglers interested in special regulation areas, Finding good places to trout fish can be as simple as going the Smoke Hole features a catch-and-release area, which starts online and visiting a DNR or VDGIF website to check where at Eagle Rock and runs downstream one mile. From Smoke trout are being stocked. You choose your destination and Hole to Big Bend is a great float. prepare for your visit by purchasing the gear you think you’ll Fish are stocked weekly starting in March. Holdovers from need. Then the big day arrives and you head to the stream previous years, plus the new fish truly make the South Branch only to turn off the road and find you’re not alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia
    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, 4 p., 1 pl. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Indicted on 59 Charges by Jean A
    Est. 1845 Wednesday, November 22, 2017 | VOLUME 126 • NUMBER 47 TWO SECTIONS • 16 PAGES 94¢ USPS 362-300 East Hardy Tanks Sherman | Page 1B Dave Workman Retires | Page 6 Shop the Potomac Highlands | Page 3B Cook Indicted On 59 Charges By Jean A. Flanagan counts of obtaining money by The penalty for each count Moorefield Examiner false pretenses. of forgery is not less than one According to the 31-page year and not more than 10 Brenda Cook, 58, of indictment, in July 2012, Cook years in the penitentiary, or at Moorefield was indicted last allegedly created false Family the discretion of the court, not week in Grant County on 15 Support contracts on behalf of more than one year in jail and counts of forgery, 15 counts of 15 separate clients of the Po- a fine not to exceed $500. uttering a forged document, tomac Highlands Guild, with The indictment further al- 15 counts of taking the iden- the intent to defraud, which leges Cook attempted to em- tification of another and 14 constitutes forgery. Continued on page 8 Wardensville Council Members of the Wardensville Garden Market include Assistant Director of Operations Alyssa Rexroad, Approve Welcome Banners Director of Operations Ryan Grimm, Farm Assistant Sarah Hammond and Farm Director Cindy Jenks. The Garden Market was presented with a grant by Yvonne Williams with the Hardy County Community By Jean A. Flanagan “We have identified 30 poles but we’re not Foundation. Photos by Jean Flanagan Moorefield Examiner sure if all will be used.” By Jean A. Flanagan He also said the banners would not interfere Moorefield Examiner The banners will say “Welcome to Wardens- with the Christmas decorations.
    [Show full text]
  • Amd Inventory in Wv
    AMD INVENTORY IN WV Ben B. Faulkner ABSTRACT Recent sampling and aquatic habitat evaluation by many entities has indicated that despite a long history of negative influence by acid mine drainage, many streams and rivers in West Virginia are improving in quality. AMD continues to negatively impact streams in many areas of the state, but a combined effort industry, state, and federal concerns to control AMD at active mine sites, bond forfeitures, and abandoned mine lands has resulted in improved fisheries and restored water uses. Effective chemical treatment and watershed improvement efforts utilizing passive technologies have been the primary cause of this trend. Active mine sites, bond forfeiture sites, and AML projects dealing with AMD are inventoried for location and extent. Trends in AMD affected watersheds are presented. INTRODUCTION For many years at this symposium and at other venues, much discussion has been made about the extent, nature, and solution for acid mine drainage (AMD). Acid mine drainage research began prior to this century (Gleason 1976). Evaluation of the efficacy of acid mine drainage abatement measures is difficult.. Even empirical analytical data may not reflect the actual measure of success of a mitigative endeavor. Most technical papers present a substantial amount of analytical data at a specific site prior to and after the water quality mitigation effort. However, the real indicator of mine drainage mitigation is restored or preserved habitat and water uses in receiving streams. I should like to present an overview of the AMD problem in West Virginia. Rather than explore the technical intricacies of AMD formation and mitigation, l would rather discuss the extent, nature, and trends of AMD in the Mountain State.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Nutrient Criteria for West Virginia Lakes
    Recommended Nutrient Criteria for West Virginia Lakes April 21, 2006 Submitted to: Lisa McClung, Director Division of Water and Waste Management West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25301 Submitted by: Evan Hansen and Martin Christ West Virginia Rivers Coalition 801 N. Randolph Ave. Elkins, WV 26241 Margaret Janes Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment PO Box 507 Lewisburg, WV 24901 Joseph Hankins The Conservation Fund Freshwater Institute 1098 Turner Road Shepherdstown, WV 25443-4228 Neil Gillies Cacapon Institute Rt 1 Box 326 High View, WV 26808 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 2 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 6 3 Guidelines adopted by the NCC ............................................................................................. 8 4 Scientific background............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Hypoxia due to eutrophication........................................................................................ 9 4.2 Degradation of, and shifts in, fish communities ............................................................. 9 4.3 Damage to recreation .................................................................................................... 10 5 Review of analyses
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004
    WEST VIRGINIA Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004 West Virginia Division of Natural Resources D I Investment in a Legacy --------------------------- S West Virginia’s anglers enjoy a rich sportfishing legacy and conservation ethic that is maintained T through their commitment to our state’s fishery resources. Recognizing this commitment, the R Division of Natural Resources endeavors to provide a variety of quality fishing opportunities to meet I increasing demands, while also conserving and protecting the state’s valuable aquatic resources. One way that DNR fulfills this part of its mission is through its fish hatchery programs. Many anglers are C aware of the successful trout stocking program and the seven coldwater hatcheries that support this T important fishery in West Virginia. The warmwater hatchery program, although a little less well known, is still very significant to West Virginia anglers. O West Virginia’s warmwater hatchery program has been instrumental in providing fishing opportunities F to anglers for more than 60 years. For most of that time, the Palestine State Fish Hatchery was the state’s primary facility dedicated to the production of warmwater fish. Millions of walleye, muskellunge, channel catfish, hybrid striped bass, saugeye, tiger musky, and largemouth F and smallmouth bass have been raised over the years at Palestine and stocked into streams, rivers, and lakes across the state. I A recent addition to the DNR’s warmwater hatchery program is the Apple Grove State Fish Hatchery in Mason County. Construction of the C hatchery was completed in 2003. It was a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the DNR as part of a mitigation agreement E for the modernization of the Robert C.
    [Show full text]