Electoral Security Assessment – Haiti, 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electoral Security Assessment – Haiti, 2013 ELECTORAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT HAITI Task Order No: AID-521-O-12-00135 January 2013 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Creative Associates International. Haiti Electoral Security Assessment Report January 7, 2013 I. Executive Summary Introduction From October 24 through November 13, 2012, Creative Associates International (Creative) conducted an electoral security assessment in Haiti funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The Creative team was led by Mr. Jeff Fischer and included Ms. Sophie Lagueny, Mr. Jules Lalancette, and Mr. Rudolf Derose. The objective of the mission was threefold: 1) to identify the vulnerabilities and history of electoral conflict in Haiti; 2) to develop profiles on potential conflict in the 2013 electoral cycle; and 3) to put forward a set of recommendations on programming to prevent, manage, or mediate this conflict. These three objectives combine to produce an Electoral Security Framework for Haiti. The assessment team met with state, non-state, and international stakeholders in Haiti, with a focus on the departments of Northeast (Fort-Liberté and Ouananinthe), South (Les Cayes), Nippes (Miragoâne), and Grand’Anse (Jeremie). This Framework seeks to address the following problem statement and development hypothesis: Problem Statement: Without new strategic interventions, the cycle of electoral violence in Haiti will continue to de-stabilize governance, politics, and society. The factors contributing to this violence include a “win-at-all-cost” political culture; lack of economic opportunities, particularly for youth; and a culture of impunity for crimes of electoral violence and malpractice. Development Hypothesis: If multi-sectoral interventions can be conducted involving electoral assistance, political party development, rule of law, civic participation, gender, media, security sector reform, and livelihoods, some reduction in electoral violence may be achieved in 2013. However, security, political, social, and economic vulnerabilities for electoral violence have been longstanding, varied, and resistant to reform. These factors will pose ongoing obstacles to development objectives and associated programming. This approach to developing the Electoral Security Framework for Haiti has been guided by USAID’s Electoral Security Framework – Technical Guidance Handbook for Democracy and Governance Officers (2010).1 This Framework is organized into the following sections: 1) Executive Summary; 2) Introduction; 3) Contextual Analysis (security, political, social, and economic factors); 4) Historical Electoral Conflict Factors (pre-election, Election Day, and post-election phases); 5) Electoral Security Stakeholder Analysis (state, non-state, and international); 6) Preliminary Electoral Conflict Profile (departments of Northeast, South, Nippes, and Grand’Anse; 7) Mitigating Factors and 1 The Handbook describing the Framework can be found at the following link: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/1-Electoral-Security- Framework.pdf. This document includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Recipient and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part. 2 2 Haiti Electoral Security Assessment Report January 7, 2013 “Wild Cards;” 8) Electoral Conflict-Related Issues; 9) Electoral Security Planning and Programming; 10) Monitoring and Evaluation; and 11) Conclusion. Contextual Analysis The contextual analysis identifies the fundamental security, political, social, and economic factors which can create vulnerabilities for electoral violence to occur. The impact of each factor on the potential for violence will vary in weight and timing during the electoral cycle. A description of these factors and their relationships to electoral conflict are discussed in the section below. By identifying these factors, strategic objectives and program interventions can be crafted to address the conflict which they potentially foster. These factors have created vulnerabilities in past elections and will pose similar vulnerabilities for the 2013 electoral cycle. The security factors identified as creating vulnerabilities for electoral conflict are: a) Haitian National Police (PNH) enforcement capacity; b) availability of firearms; c) private armed groups (PAGs); and d) drug trafficking organizations (DTOs). The political factors identified as creating vulnerabilities for electoral conflict are: a) regime type; b) electoral administration; c) electoral and political party systems; d) money and electoral violence; e) return of opposing political exiles; f) relocation of public officials; g) timing and sequencing of elections; and h) culture of impunity for crimes of electoral violence and malpractice. There are two social factors identified as creating vulnerabilities for electoral violence to occur: a) post-disaster displacement/shelter; and b) youth bulge. Also, Haiti’s economic indicators create vulnerabilities for electoral violence to occur as a consequence of poverty, unemployment, and lack of economic fairness. Placing these vulnerabilities into perspective, some may be responsive to development programming such as capacity building for electoral administration, the PNH, and judicial officials. Additional vulnerabilities can be reduced by legislative action such as the electoral framework and political finance reform, and the timing and sequencing of elections. Some vulnerabilities, however, are conditional in nature and may be the least responsive to short term programming including the availability of firearms, regime type, and the economic factors. Other factors are present on such a scale, such as the post- disaster displacement and youth bulge, that comprehensive solutions cannot be anticipated over the short term. It can also be anticipated that DTOs will be unresponsive to development programming and remain targets for law enforcement and anti-drug trafficking initiatives. Finally, some factors are behavioral in nature, such as the “win-at- all-cost” political culture, government pressure on local officials, and engaging armed groups in electoral violence. These vulnerabilities will only diminish if the political will is created for behavioral reform to occur. Historical Electoral Conflict Factors Based upon this history of Haitian electoral conflict, the conflict profile is summarized in the matrix below. This document includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Recipient and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part. 3 3 Haiti Electoral Security Assessment Report January 7, 2013 Historical Patterns of Electoral Conflict Profile Focus Pre-Election Phase Election Day Phase Post-Election Phase Perpetrators Primary - State and Primary – State and Primary – Political State Proxies State Proxies Rivals Incumbent youth Incumbent agents General supporters and Private Armed PNH Secondary – State Groups (PAGs) Secondary – and State Proxies PNH Political Rivals PNH Elites Political party DTO financing agents and enforcers Secondary – Voters Political Rivals Political party agents and enforcers Victims Opposition Poll workers Election officials candidates and Candidates Poll workers supporters Voters Public officials Journalists Journalists Opposition PNH PNH supporters and MINUSTAH MINUSTAH voters PNH MINUSTAH General public Motives Eliminate or force Suppress voter Overturn election withdrawal of a turnout results candidacy Disrupt voting Inhibit campaigning Falsify tally sheets and support for Disenfranchisement opposition candidates Tactics Homicide Physical assaults Street actions Assaults with Intimidation Physical assaults firearms Bribery Destruction of Physical assaults Destruction of property Intimidation property Intimidation Bribery Locations Candidate home Polling stations Public street towns Areas around Election facilities Constituencies with polling centers close contests This document includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Recipient and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part. 4 4 Haiti Electoral Security Assessment Report January 7, 2013 Electoral Security Stakeholder Analysis Electoral security stakeholders can be grouped into three categories: 1) state; 2) non-state; and 3) international. State stakeholders can be regulatory, security, or judicial in nature. The primary regulatory stakeholder is the Electoral Council (CEP) and its associated administrative units at the departmental (BED) and communal (BEC) levels, as well as the National Electoral Challenges Office (BCEN). The primary security stakeholder is the Haitian National Police (PNH). Judicial stakeholders are the ordinary courts of Haiti and justices of the peace. Non-state stakeholders include political parties, civil society organizations (CSOs), faith-based organizations (FBOs), other domestic observer groups, and media organizations. International stakeholders include the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), “international community,” and international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) involved with electoral assistance, domestic observation, conflict mediation, rule of law, and political party development. Preliminary Electoral Conflict Profile There are vulnerabilities which may potentially trigger violence in all phases of the electoral cycle. However, the profile of that violence will vary with each phase. In the
Recommended publications
  • Voting for Hope Elections in Haiti
    COMMENTARY Voting for hope Elections in Haiti Peter Hallward ate in the night of 29 February 2004, after weeks of confusion and uncertainty, the enemies of Haitiʼs president Jean-Bertrand Aristide forced him into exile Lfor the second time. There was plenty of ground for confusion. Although twice elected with landslide majorities, by 2004 Aristide was routinely identified as an enemy of democracy. Although political violence declined dramatically during his years in office, he was just as regularly condemned as an enemy of human rights. Although he was prepared to make far-reaching compromises with his opponents, he was attacked as intolerant of dissent. Although still immensely popular among the poor, he was derided as aloof and corrupt. And although his enemies presented themselves as the friends of democracy, pluralism and civil society, the only way they could get rid of their nemesis was through foreign intervention and military force. Four times postponed, the election of Aristideʼs successor finally took place a few months ago, in February 2006. These elections were supposed to clear up the confusion of 2004 once and for all. With Aristide safely out of the picture, they were supposed to show how his violent and illegal expulsion had actually been a victory for democracy. With his Fanmi Lavalas party broken and divided, they were intended to give the true friends of pluralism and civil society that democratic mandate they had so long been denied. Haitiʼs career politicians, confined to the margins since Aristideʼs first election back in 1990, were finally to be given a chance to inherit their rightful place.
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns
    Order Code RL32294 Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns Updated January 25, 2008 Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Clare Ribando Seelke Analyst in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns Summary Following the first free and fair elections in Haiti’s history, Jean-Bertrand Aristide first became Haitian President in February 1991. He was overthrown by a military coup in September 1991. For over three years, the military regime resisted international demands that Aristide be restored to office. In September 1994, after a U.S. military intervention had been launched, the military regime agreed to Aristide’s return, the immediate, unopposed entry of U.S. troops, and the resignation of its leadership. President Aristide returned to Haiti in October 1994 under the protection of some 20,000 U.S. troops, and disbanded the Haitian army. U.S. aid helped train a civilian police force. Subsequently, critics charged Aristide with politicizing that force and engaging in corrupt practices. Elections held under Aristide and his successor, René Préval (1996-2000), including the one in which Aristide was reelected in 2000, were marred by alleged irregularities, low voter turnout, and opposition boycotts. Efforts to negotiate a resolution to the electoral dispute frustrated the international community for years. Tension and violence continued throughout Aristide’s second term, culminating in his departure from office in February 2004, after the opposition repeatedly refused to negotiate a political solution and armed groups took control of half the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Election-Violence-Mo
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In the Matter of: IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS XX YYY xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx DECLARATION OF ZZZZZZ I, ZZZZZ, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 1. I do not recall having ever met XX YYY in person. This affidavit is based on my review of Mr. YYY’s Application for Asylum and my knowledge of relevant conditions in Haiti. I am familiar with the broader context of Mr. YYY’s application for asylum, including the history of political violence in Haiti, especially surrounding elections, attacks against journalists and the current security and human rights conditions in Haiti. Radio in Haiti 2. In Haiti, radio is by far the most important media format. Only a small percentage of the population can afford television, and electricity shortages limit the usefulness of the televisions that are in service. An even smaller percentage can afford internet access. Over half the people do not read well, and newspaper circulation is minuscule. There are many radio stations in Haiti, with reception available in almost every corner of the country. Radios are inexpensive to buy and can operate without municipal electricity. 3. Radio’s general importance makes it particularly important for elections. Radio programs, especially call-in shows, are Haiti’s most important forum for discussing candidates and parties. As a result, radio stations become contested ground for political advocacy, especially around elections. Candidates, officials and others involved in politics work hard and spend money to obtain favorable coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Election Impasse in Haiti
    At a glance April 2016 The election impasse in Haiti The run-off in the 2015 presidential elections in Haiti has been suspended repeatedly, after the opposition contested the first round in October 2015. Just before the end of President Martelly´s mandate on 7 February 2016, an agreement was reached to appoint an interim President and a new Provisional Electoral Council, fixing new elections for 24 April 2016. Although most of the agreement has been respected , the second round was in the end not held on the scheduled date. Background After nearly two centuries of mainly authoritarian rule which culminated in the Duvalier family dictatorship (1957-1986), Haiti is still struggling to consolidate its own democratic institutions. A new Constitution was approved in 1987, amended in 2012, creating the conditions for a democratic government. The first truly free and fair elections were held in 1990, and won by Jean-Bertrand Aristide (Fanmi Lavalas). He was temporarily overthrown by the military in 1991, but thanks to international pressure, completed his term in office three years later. Aristide replaced the army with a civilian police force, and in 1996, when succeeded by René Préval (Inite/Unity Party), power was transferred democratically between two elected Haitian Presidents for the first time. Aristide was re-elected in 2001, but his government collapsed in 2004 and was replaced by an interim government. When new elections took place in 2006, Préval was elected President for a second term, Parliament was re-established, and a short period of democratic progress followed. A food crisis in 2008 generated violent protest, leading to the removal of the Prime Minister, and the situation worsened with the 2010 earthquake.
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti's National Elections
    Haiti’s National Elections: Issues and Concerns Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs March 23, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41689 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Haiti’s National Elections: Issues and Concerns Summary In proximity to the United States, and with such a chronically unstable political environment and fragile economy, Haiti has been a constant policy issue for the United States. Congress views the stability of the nation with great concern and commitment to improving conditions there. Both Congress and the international community have invested significant resources in the political, economic, and social development of Haiti, and will be closely monitoring the election process as a prelude to the next steps in Haiti’s development. For the past 25 years, Haiti has been making the transition from a legacy of authoritarian rule to a democratic government. Elections are a part of that process. In the short term, elections have usually been a source of increased political tensions and instability in Haiti. In the long term, elected governments in Haiti have contributed to the gradual strengthening of government capacity and transparency. Haiti is currently approaching the end of its latest election cycle. Like many of the previous elections, the current process has been riddled with political tensions, allegations of irregularities, and violence. The first round of voting for president and the legislature was held on November 28, 2010. That vote was marred by opposition charges of fraud, reports of irregularities, and low voter turnout. When the electoral council’s preliminary results showed that out-going President Rene Préval’s little-known protégé, and governing party candidate, Jude Celestin, had edged out a popular musician for a spot in the runoff elections by less than one percent, three days of violent protests ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Development, and Discourse in Port-Au-Prince
    What’s Wrong with Haiti? Politics, Development, and Discourse in Port-au-Prince by Alison C. Joersz A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Stuart Kirsch, Co-Chair Associate Professor Michael P. Lempert, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Robert S. Jansen Professor Alaina M. Lemon Professor Kristina S. Wirtz, Western Michigan University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this dissertation was a long, and often difficult journey. It was one supported by the assistance of many individuals and institutions in a variety of forms. They are too numerable to be named individually yet I am eternally grateful for each and every one of them, no matter how big or small the assistance was. The research and writing for this project was generously supported by fellowships from University of Michigan’s International Institute, Rackham Graduate School, the Department of Anthropology, the Institute for Research on Women and Gender, and the Institute for the Humanities. Along the way, I received considerable scholarly advice, encouragement, and support from mentors, advisors, instructors, and colleagues alike, including my entire committee – Stuart Kirsch, Michael Lempert, Kristina Wirtz, Alaina Lemon, and Rob Jansen – as well as:Mark Schuller, Chelsey Kivland, Richard Turits, Maxwell Owusu, Sophonie Joseph, Athena Kolbe, Ling Lab participants, Michicagoan attendees (2013), my fellow IRWG Community of Scholars participants (2014), and Humanities Institute scholars (2014-15). Living in Haiti and learning from those around me was not always an easy process yet it was made that much easier and enjoyable by the many generous Haitians and expatriates who went out of their way to help a stumbling and sometimes incoherent blan.
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response
    Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response Rhoda Margesson Specialist in International Humanitarian Policy Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs February 2, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41023 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response Summary The largest earthquake ever recorded in Haiti devastated parts of the country, including the capital, on January 12, 2010. The quake, centered about 15 miles southwest of Port-au-Prince, had a magnitude of 7.0. A series of strong aftershocks have followed. The damage is severe and catastrophic. It is estimated that 3 million people, approximately one third of the overall population, have been affected by the earthquake. The Government of Haiti is reporting an estimated 112,000 deaths and 194,000 injured. In the immediate wake of the earthquake, President Preval described conditions in his country as “unimaginable,” and appealed for international assistance. As immediate needs are met and the humanitarian relief operation continues, the government is struggling to restore the institutions needed for it to function, ensure political stability, and address long-term reconstruction and development planning. Prior to the earthquake, the international community was providing extensive development and humanitarian assistance to Haiti. With that assistance, the Haitian government had made significant progress in recent years in many areas of its development strategy. The destruction of Haiti’s nascent infrastructure and other extensive damage caused by the earthquake will set back Haiti’s development significantly. Haiti’s long-term development plans will need to be revised. The sheer scale of the relief effort in Haiti has brought together tremendous capacity and willingness to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Haiti
    Coor din ates: 1 9 °00′N 7 2 °2 5 ′W Haiti Haiti (/ heɪti/ ( listen); French: Haïti [a.iti]; Haitian ˈ Republic of Haiti Creole: Ayiti [ajiti]), officially the Republic of Haiti (French: République d'Haïti; Haitian Creole: Repiblik République d'Haïti (French) [8] [note 1] Ayiti) and formerly called Hayti, is a Repiblik Ayiti (Haitian Creole) sovereign state located on the island of Hispaniola in the Greater Antilles archipelago of the Caribbean Sea. It occupies the western three-eighths of the island, which it shares with the Dominican Republic.[11][12] Haiti is 27 ,7 50 square kilometres (10,7 14 sq mi) in Flag Coat of arms size and has an estimated 10.8 million people,[4] making it the most populous country in the Caribbean Motto: "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" (French)[1] Community (CARICOM) and the second-most "Libète, Egalite, Fratènite" (Haitian Creole) populous country in the Caribbean as a whole. The "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" region was originally inhabited by the indigenous Motto on traditional coat of arms: Taíno people. Spain landed on the island on 5 "L'union fait la force" (French) [2] December 1492 during the first voyage of Christopher "Inite se fòs" (Haitian Creole) Columbus across the Atlantic. When Columbus "Union makes strength" initially landed in Haiti, he had thought he had found Anthem: La Dessalinienne (French) [13] India or China. On Christmas Day 1492, Columbus' Desalinyèn (Haitian Creole) flagship the Santa Maria ran aground north of what is "The Dessalines Song" 0:00 MENU now Limonade.[14][15][16][17] As a consequence, Columbus ordered his men to salvage what they could from the ship, and he created the first European settlement in the Americas, naming it La Navidad after the day the ship was destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Fact Sheet HAITI June 2007
    National Documentation Packages, Issue Papers and Country Fact Sheets Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada www.irb-cisr.gc.ca ● Français ● Home ● Contact Us ● Help ● Search ● canada.gc.ca Home > Research > National Documentation Packages, Issue Papers and Country Fact Sheets Country Fact Sheet HAITI June 2007 Disclaimer 3. POLITICAL PARTIESF Front for Hope (Front de l’espoir, Fwon Lespwa): The Front for Hope was founded in 2005 to support the candidacy of René Préval in the 2006 presidential election.13 This is a party of alliances that include the Effort and Solidarity to Build a National and Popular Alternative (Effort de solidarité pour la construction d’une alternative nationale et populaire, ESCANP);14 the Open the Gate Party (Pati Louvri Baryè, PLB);15 and grass-roots organizations, such as Grand-Anse Resistance Committee Comité de résistance de Grand-Anse), the Central Plateau Peasants’ Group (Mouvement paysan du plateau Central) and the Southeast Kombit Movement (Mouvement Kombit du SudEst or Kombit Sudest).16 The Front for Hope is headed by René Préval,17 the current head of state, elected in 2006.18 In the 2006 legislative elections, the party won 13 of the 30 seats in the Senate and 24 of the 99 seats in the Chamber of Deputies.19 Merging of Haitian Social Democratic Parties (Parti Fusion des sociaux-démocrates haïtiens, PFSDH): This party was created on 23 April 2005 with the fusion of the following three democratic parties: Ayiti Capable (Ayiti kapab), the National Congress of Democratic Movements (Congrès national des
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Discouraged: International Observers and Haiti's 2015 Elections
    Democracy Discouraged: International Observers and Haiti's 2015 Elections September, 2016 Democracy Discouraged: International Observers and Haiti's 2015 Elections Introduction: The Gordian Knot of a Never-Ending Crisis By Ricardo Seitenfus he Haitian electoral crisis of 2015-2016, the focus of this excellent report, sheds light on a situation of grave importance that, I hope, may also become irreversible. Namely, an abandonment of the idea that Haiti’sT salvation can only come from overseas. Finally, the Haitian government is making the elections a matter of sovereign concern. A quick glance at the past three decades in Haiti reveals the overwhelming failures of attempts to stabilize or “normalize” the country through foreign support. No less than $30 billion has been spent on resolving this recurrent crisis. What a complete and utter waste. The political transition from dictatorship to democracy has not only been the longest and most chaotic for Haiti, it has also not yet managed to set the ground rules in its struggle for power. Changes to Latin American political systems, as well as in those of Spain, Portugal and Greece, have enabled power to be transferred to the people, rendering dictatorships and repressive democracies a thing of the past. Upheld by foreign influence, Haiti, by contrast, is yet to experience such a transition. Traditionally, the losers of elections have contested the legitimacy of the votes while the winners have abused their power and attempted to subjugate the opposition. The notion of ‘crisis’ has an unusual dimension here because the mechanisms deployed to resolve conflicts have included resorting to authoritarianism and the use of force.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Candidats Inscrits Pour Les Élections/Sélections !
    Vol. 8 • No. 46 • Du 27 mai au 2 juin 2015 Haiti 20 gdes/ USA $1.50/ France 2 euros/ Canada $2.00 JUSTICEHAÏTI • VÉRITÉ • INDÉPENDANCE LIBERTÉ Nou sonje jeneral 1583 Albany Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11210 Tel: 718-421-0162 Email: [email protected] Web: www.haitiliberte.com Benwa Batravil ! 70 CANDIDATS INSCRITS POUR LES Page 4 ÉLECTIONS/SÉLECTIONS ! English Page 9 Les élections annoncées riment- t-elles avec l’insécurité ? Assassinat d’Emmanuel Goutier Page 7 Voir page 8 Ci-dessus de gauche à droite: Supplice Beauzile Edmonde, Moise Jean Charles et ci-dessous Jovenel Moise et Gautier Marie Antoinette LAURENT LAMOTHE S’AUDITE LUI-MÊME! Damnés de la mer, damnés du capitalisme : Réflexion sur le phénomène Lampedusa ! Page 12 Barcelone, épicentre du Voir page 5 changement Conférence de presse de Laurent Salvador Lamothe, le mardi 26 mai, à la salle Thérèse de l’hôtel Le Plaza, pour contester le rapport de la Cour Page 18 supérieure des comptes et du contentieux administratif et se donner lui-même un audit favorable à son administration Editorial HAITI LIBERTÉ 1583 Albany Ave Brooklyn, NY 11210 Tel: 718-421-0162 Fax: 718-421-3471 Fruits vénéneux de la division et perspectives 3, 2ème Impasse Lavaud Port-au-Prince, Haiti Par Berthony Dupont oublier « le capitalisme est un péché mortel ». Fort de cette cohé- sion, le peuple n’avait pas permis qu’on bloquât ou manipulât Email : [email protected] les élections de 1990. Cette opération avait bouleversé les plans e pays est en train de voler en éclats du fait d’une crise élec- machiavéliques de certaines ambassades occidentales en Haïti Website : Ltorale reflétant une large paralysie, elle-même engendrant au point que bien avant les élections, nous étions sûrs de les www.haitiliberte.com une situation sociale fortement agitée.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America/Caribbean Report, Nr. 21
    CONSOLIDATING STABILITY IN HAITI Latin America/Caribbean Report N°21 – 18 July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. SECURITY...................................................................................................................... 1 A. PROGRESS.............................................................................................................................1 B. REMAINING FRAGILITY .........................................................................................................3 III. CONSOLIDATING STABILITY IN PORT-AU-PRINCE: CITÉ SOLEIL............ 5 A. LESSONS LEARNED FROM EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE ...............................................................5 B. COORDINATION AND JOB CREATION CHALLENGES ...............................................................6 C. LOCAL SECURITY AND JUSTICE CHALLENGES .......................................................................8 D. THE COMMUNE GOVERNMENT..............................................................................................9 IV. GOVERNANCE AND POLITICAL REFORM........................................................ 10 A. THE NATIONAL POLITICAL SCENE ......................................................................................10 B. PARLIAMENT.......................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]