DOCSLIB.ORG

C4285 Chelsea Girls (Usa, 1967)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C4285 Chelsea Girls (Usa, 1967) C4285 CHELSEA GIRLS (USA, 1967) Credits: director, Andy Warhol ; writers, Andy Warhol, Ronald Tavel. Cast: Nico, Ondine, Mary Might, International Velvet. Summary: Experimental film set in contemporary New York City at the Chelsea Hotel. A 210 minute expose of the lifestyles of Andy Warhol’s New York Factory crowd, an over-sexed, drugged-out, narcissistic group of hipsters and homosexuals. Includes Vietnam War references. Adair, Gilbert. Hollywood’s Vietnam [GB] (p. 52) ___________. Vietnam on film [GB] (p. 74) Andy Warhol film factory (edited by Michael O’Pray) London : BFI Pub., 1989. Battcock, Gregory. “Notes on the Chelsea girls: a film by Andy Warhol” Art journal 26/4 (summer 1967), p. 363-5. Bourdon, David. “Warhol as filmmaker” Art in America 59 (May-Jun 1971), p. 48- 53. Burnett, Ron. [Chelsea girls] Take one 1/4 (Apr 1967), p. 23-4. Callenbach, Ernest. [Chelsea girls] Film culture 21/2 (winter 1967-8), p. 60. “Chelsea girls” American Film Institute catalog [GB] (Entry F6.0761) [Chelsea girls] Cahiers du cinema in English n. 10 (May 1967), p. 43-9. [Chelsea girls] Filmfacts 9 (1966), p. 369. [Chelsea girls] Hollywood reporter 195/11 (Mar 30, 1967), p. 3. [Chelsea girls] Monthly film bulletin 39/462 (Jul 1972), p. 134. [Chelsea girls] Monthly film bulletin 39/463 (Aug 1972), p. 179. “Chelsea girls” Motion picture guide (edited by Jay Robert Nash and Stanley Ralph Ross) Chicago : Cinebooks, 1985. (v. 2, p. 408) [Chelsea girls] Today 23 (Oct 1967), p. 33. Cipnic, D. J. “Andy Warhol, iconographer” Sight and sound (summer 1972) Coplans, John. Andy Warhol. Greenwich, Conn. : New York Graphic Society, 1970. Cowan, Bob. “My life and times with the Chelsea girls” Take one (Sep-Oct 1971) Crawford, Pamela. [Chelsea girls] Cineaste 1/3 (winter 1967-8), p. 20-21. Crone, Rainer. Andy Warhol. New York : Praeger, 1970. Devine, Jeremy M. Vietnam at 24 frames a second [GB] (p. 38) Durgnat, Raymond. [Chelsea girls] Films and filming 15/11 (Aug 1969), p. 36-8. Ehrenstein, David. [Chelsea girls] Film culture 42 (fall, 1966), p. 8-9. Gelmis, Joseph. The film director as superstar. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday, 1970. [interview] (p. 65-73) Gidal, Peter. Andy Warhol: films and paintings. London : Studio Vista ; New York : Dutton Picturebacks, 1971. Hirsch. “The Chelsea girls” Variety (Jan 18, 1967), p. 6. Koch, Stephen. Stargazer: Andy Warhol’s world and his films. New York : Praeger, 1973 [rev. ed. 1985] (p. 86-97). ___________. Stargazer: Andy Warhol’s world and his friends. New York: 1973. Larson, R. “A retrospective look at the films of D.W. Griffith and Andy Warhol” Film journal (fall-winter 1972) Lithgow, James. [Chelsea girls] Films and filming 15/11 (Aug 1969), p. 21, 24. Lowry, Ed. “Chelsea girls” International dictionary of films and filmmakers (2nd ed) [GB] (p. 171-3) Lugg, Andrew. “On Andy Warhol” Cineaste (winter 1967-68) Mussman, Toby. [Chelsea girls] Film culture n. 45 (summer 1967), p. 41-44. Pile, Susan. [Chelsea girls] Film culture n. 45 (summer 1967), p. 46. Price, James. [Chelsea girls] Sight and sound 37/2 (spring 1968) Pruitt, John. “Jonas Mekas: A European critic in America” in To free the cinema: Jonas Mekas & the New York underground (edited by David E. James) Princeton, N.J. : Princeton Univ. Press, 1992. (p. 49-61) Sarris, Andrew. [Chelsea girls] Village voice (Dec 15, 1966) Shatnoff, Judith. [Chelsea girls] Film quarterly 20/4 (summer 1967), p. 73-6. Simon, John. Private screenings New York : Macmillan, 1967. (p. 261-2) Smith, Patrick S. Andy Warhol’s art and films. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI Research Press, 1986. Stoller, James. “Beyond cinema: notes on some films by Andy Warhol” Film quarterly 20/1 (fall 1966), p. 35-8. Tyler, Parker. “Dragtime or drugtime: or film a la Warhol” Evergreen revue (Apr 1967) __________. Underground film: a critical history. New York : Grove Press, 1969. [Reissued: London : Secker and Warburg, 1971; Harmondsworth [England] : Penguin, 1974] Warhol, Andy. “My favorite superstar: Notes on my epic, ‘Chelsea girls’” Arts magazine (Feb 1967) Wilcock, John. The autobiography and sex life of Andy Warhol. New York : Other Scenes, 1971. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boo-Hooray Catalog #10: Flyers
    Catalog 10 Flyers + Boo-hooray May 2021 22 eldridge boo-hooray.com New york ny Boo-Hooray Catalog #10: Flyers Boo-Hooray is proud to present our tenth antiquarian catalog, exploring the ephemeral nature of the flyer. We love marginal scraps of paper that become important artifacts of historical import decades later. In this catalog of flyers, we celebrate phenomenal throwaway pieces of paper in music, art, poetry, film, and activism. Readers will find rare flyers for underground films by Kenneth Anger, Jack Smith, and Andy Warhol; incredible early hip-hop flyers designed by Buddy Esquire and others; and punk artifacts of Crass, the Sex Pistols, the Clash, and the underground Austin scene. Also included are scarce protest flyers and examples of mutual aid in the 20th Century, such as a flyer from Angela Davis speaking in Harlem only months after being found not guilty for the kidnapping and murder of a judge, and a remarkably illustrated flyer from a free nursery in the Lower East Side. For over a decade, Boo-Hooray has been committed to the organization, stabilization, and preservation of cultural narratives through archival placement. Today, we continue and expand our mission through the sale of individual items and smaller collections. We encourage visitors to browse our extensive inventory of rare books, ephemera, archives and collections and look forward to inviting you back to our gallery in Manhattan’s Chinatown. Catalog prepared by Evan Neuhausen, Archivist & Rare Book Cataloger and Daylon Orr, Executive Director & Rare Book Specialist; with Beth Rudig, Director of Archives. Photography by Evan, Beth and Daylon.
    [Show full text]
  • Affective Temporalities in Gob Squad’S Kitchen (You’Ve Never Had It So Good)
    56 ANA PAIS AFFECTIVE TEMPORALITIES IN GOB SQUAD’S KITCHEN (YOU’VE NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD) In this article I will be drawing upon affect theory to unpack issues of authenticity, mediation, participation in the production Gob Squads’s Kitchen, by Gob Squad. English/German collective reconstructed Andy Warhol’s early film Kitchen, shot 47 years before, in the flamboyant Factory, starring ephemeral celebrities such as Eve Sedgwick. Alongside Eat (1964), Sleep (1963) and Screen Test (1964-66). Although it premièred in Berlin, in 2007, the show has been touring in several countries and, in 2012, it received the New York Drama Desk Award for Unique Theatrical Experience.I will be examining how the production’s spatial dispositive creates a mediated intimacy that generates affective temporalities and how their performativity allows us to think of the audience as actively engaged in an affective resonance with the stage. Intimacy creates worlds (Berlant 2000). It brings audience and performer closer not only to each other but also to the shifting moment of Performance Art’s capture by institutional discourses and market value. Unleashing affective temporalities allows the audience to embody its potency, to be, again, “at the beginning”.Drawing upon André Lepecki’s notion of reenactments as activations of creative possibilities, I will be suggesting that Gob Squads’s Kitchen merges past and present by disclosing accumulated affects, promises and deceptions attached to the thrilling period of the sixties in order to reperform a possibility of a new beginning at the heart of a nowthen time. In conclusion, this article will shed new light on the performative possibilities of affect to surmount theatrical separation and weave intensive attachments.
    [Show full text]
  • An Alternative Reading of Warhol's Early Cinema
    Nothing/Something: An Alternative Reading of Warhol’s Early Cinema by James Anthony Chamberlain Nothing/Something nothing, pron., and n. 1. Not any (material or immaterial) thing; nought. 2. No part, share, or quantity of a thing; no aspect, evidence, or quality of a thing or person. 3. Not anything, or anybody, of importance, significance, value, or concern; something or somebody of no importance, etc. 4. That which is not any number or quantity; a figure or character representing this; zero. 5. a. That which has no existence or being; nothingness. b. That which no longer exists; a person who or thing which has been extinguished or destroyed. c. to nothing: to the final point, stage, or state of a process of reduction, destruction, dissolution, etc. 6. a. A thing of no importance, value, or concern; a non-existent thing; a trifling event. b. A trivial remark. c. An insignificant person; a nobody. 7. Triviality, worthlessness, insignificance. 8. In predicative use: that which cannot be denominated; spec. a person of no religious denomination. something, n. (a.) 1. a. Some unspecified or indeterminate thing (material or immaterial). b. Used as a substitute for a name or part of one, or other particular, which is not remembered or is immaterial, etc. c. Some liquor, drink, or food; esp. in phr. to take something. d. Used (with between) to denote an intermediate stage or grade. e. Used to denote an undefined or unknown occupation, or a person in respect of this. f. or something (colloq.), used to express an indistinct or unknown alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • NO RAMBLING ON: the LISTLESS COWBOYS of HORSE Jon Davies
    WARHOL pages_BFI 25/06/2013 10:57 Page 108 If Andy Warhol’s queer cinema of the 1960s allowed for a flourishing of newly articulated sexual and gender possibilities, it also fostered a performative dichotomy: those who command the voice and those who do not. Many of his sound films stage a dynamic of stoicism and loquaciousness that produces a complex and compelling web of power and desire. The artist has summed the binary up succinctly: ‘Talk ers are doing something. Beaut ies are being something’ 1 and, as Viva explained about this tendency in reference to Warhol’s 1968 Lonesome Cowboys : ‘Men seem to have trouble doing these nonscript things. It’s a natural 5_ 10 2 for women and fags – they ramble on. But straight men can’t.’ The brilliant writer and progenitor of the Theatre of the Ridiculous Ronald Tavel’s first two films as scenarist for Warhol are paradigmatic in this regard: Screen Test #1 and Screen Test #2 (both 1965). In Screen Test #1 , the performer, Warhol’s then lover Philip Fagan, is completely closed off to Tavel’s attempts at spurring him to act out and to reveal himself. 3 According to Tavel, he was so up-tight. He just crawled into himself, and the more I asked him, the more up-tight he became and less was recorded on film, and, so, I got more personal about touchy things, which became the principle for me for the next six months. 4 When Tavel turned his self-described ‘sadism’ on a true cinematic superstar, however, in Screen Test #2 , the results were extraordinary.
    [Show full text]
  • Warhol, Andy (As Filmmaker) (1928-1987) Andy Warhol
    Warhol, Andy (as filmmaker) (1928-1987) Andy Warhol. by David Ehrenstein Image appears under the Creative Commons Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Entry Copyright © 2002, glbtq, Inc. Courtesy Jack Mitchell. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com As a painter Andy Warhol (the name he assumed after moving to New York as a young man) has been compared to everyone from Salvador Dalí to Norman Rockwell. But when it comes to his role as a filmmaker he is generally remembered either for a single film--Sleep (1963)--or for works that he did not actually direct. Born into a blue-collar family in Forest City, Pennsylvania on August 6, 1928, Andrew Warhola, Jr. attended art school at the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh. He moved to New York in 1949, where he changed his name to Andy Warhol and became an international icon of Pop Art. Between 1963 and 1967 Warhol turned out a dizzying number and variety of films involving many different collaborators, but after a 1968 attempt on his life, he retired from active duty behind the camera, becoming a producer/ "presenter" of films, almost all of which were written and directed by Paul Morrissey. Morrissey's Flesh (1968), Trash (1970), and Heat (1972) are estimable works. And Bad (1977), the sole opus of Warhol's lover Jed Johnson, is not bad either. But none of these films can compare to the Warhol films that preceded them, particularly My Hustler (1965), an unprecedented slice of urban gay life; Beauty #2 (1965), the best of the films featuring Edie Sedgwick; The Chelsea Girls (1966), the only experimental film to gain widespread theatrical release; and **** (Four Stars) (1967), the 25-hour long culmination of Warhol's career as a filmmaker.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raunchy Splendor of Mike Kuchar's Dirty Pictures
    MIKE KUCHAR ART The Raunchy Splendor of Mike Kuchar’s Dirty Pictures by JENNIFER KRASINSKI SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 “Blue Eyes” (1980–2000s) MIKE KUCHAR/ANTON KERN GALLERY/GHEBALY GALLERY AS AN ILLUSTRATOR, MY AIM IS TO AMUSE THE EYE AND SPARK IMAGINATION, wrote the great American artist and filmmaker Mike Kuchar in Primal Male, a book of his collected drawings. TO CREATE TITILLATING SCENES THAT REFRESH THE SOUL… AND PUT A BIT MORE “FUN” TO VIEWING PICTURES — and that he has done for over five decades. “Drawings by Mike!” is an exhibition of erotic illustrations at Anton Kern Gallery, one of the fall season’s great feasts for the eye and a welcome homecoming for one of New York’s most treasured prodigal sons. Sympathy for the devil: Mike Kuchar’s “Rescued!” (2017) MIKE KUCHAR/ANTON KERN GALLERY As boys growing up in the Bronx, Mike and his twin brother — the late, equally great film and video artist George (1942–2011) — loved to spend their weekends at the movies, watching everything from newsreels to B films to blockbusters, their young minds roused by all the thrills that Hollywood had to offer: romance, drama, action, science fiction, terror, suspense. As George remembered in their 1997 Reflecons From a Cinemac Cesspool, a memoir-cum–manual for aspiring filmmakers: “On the screen there would always be a wonderful tapestry of big people and they seemed so wild and crazy….e women wantonly lifted up their skirts to adjust garter-belts and men in pin-striped suits appeared from behind shadowed décor to suck and chew on Technicolor lips.” For the Kuchars, as for gay male contemporaries like Andy Warhol and Jack Smith, the movie theater was a temple for erotics both expressed and repressed, projected and appropriated, homo and hetero, all whirled together on the silver screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 Uchicago Arts Guide
    UCHICAGO ARTS FALL 2015 EVENT & EXHIBITION HIGHLIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE The Renaissance Society Centennial UChicago in the Chicago Architecture Biennial CinéVardaExpo.Agnès Varda in Chicago arts.uchicago.edu BerlinFullPage.pdf 1 8/21/15 12:27 PM 2015 Randy L. and Melvin R. BERLIN FAMILY LECTURES CONTENTS 5 Exhibitions & Visual Arts 42 Youth & Family 12 Five Things You (Probably) Didn’t 44 Arts Map Know About the Renaissance Society 46 Info 17 Film 20 CinéVardaExpo.Agnès Varda in Chicago 23 Design & Architecture Icon Key 25 Literature Chicago Architecture Biennial event 28 Multidisciplinary CinéVardaExpo event C M 31 Music UChicago 125th Anniversary event Y 39 Theater, Dance & Performance UChicago student event CM MY AMITAV GHOSH The University of Chicago is a destination where ON THE COVER CY artists, scholars, students, and audiences converge Daniel Buren, Intersecting Axes: A Work In Situ, installation view, CMY T G D and create. Explore our theaters, performance The Renaissance Society, Apr 10–May 4, 1983 K spaces, museums and galleries, academic | arts.uchicago.edu F, H, P A programs, cultural initiatives, and more. Photo credits: (page 5) Attributed to Wassily Kandinsky, Composition, 1914, oil on canvas, Smart Museum of Art, the University of Chicago, Gift of Dolores and Donn Shapiro in honor of Jory Shapiro, 2012.51.; Jessica Stockholder, detail of Rose’s Inclination, 2015, site-specific installation commissioned by the Smart Museum of Art;page ( 6) William G W Butler Yeats (1865–1939), Poems, London: published by T. Fisher Unwin; Boston: Copeland and Day, 1895, promised Gift of Deborah Wachs Barnes, Sharon Wachs Hirsch, Judith Pieprz, and Joel Wachs, AB’92; Justin Kern, Harper Memorial Reading Room, 2015, photo courtesy the artist; page( 7) Gate of Xerxes, Guardian Man-Bulls of the eastern doorway, from Erich F.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge Exploitation
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE EXPLOITATION, WOMEN AND WARHOL A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art by Kathleen Frances Burke May 1986 The Thesis of Kathleen Frances Burke is approved: Louise Leyis, M.A. Dianne E. Irwin, Ph.D. r<Iary/ Kenan Ph.D. , Chair California State. University, Northridge ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to Dr. Mary Kenon Breazeale, whose tireless efforts have brought it to fruition. She taught me to "see" and interpret art history in a different way, as a feminist, proving that women's perspectives need not always agree with more traditional views. In addition, I've learned that personal politics does not have to be sacrificed, or compartmentalized in my life, but that it can be joined with a professional career and scholarly discipline. My time as a graduate student with Dr. Breazeale has had a profound effect on my personal life and career, and will continue to do so whatever paths my life travels. For this I will always be grateful. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In addition, I would like to acknowledge the other members of my committee: Louise Lewis and Dr. Dianne Irwin. They provided extensive editorial comments which helped me to express my ideas more clearly and succinctly. I would like to thank the six branches of the Glendale iii Public Library and their staffs, in particular: Virginia Barbieri, Claire Crandall, Fleur Osmanson, Nora Goldsmith, Cynthia Carr and Joseph Fuchs. They provided me with materials and research assistance for this project. I would also like to thank the members of my family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Films of Andy Warhol Stillness, Repetition, and the Surface of Things
    The Films of Andy Warhol Stillness, Repetition, and the Surface of Things David Gariff National Gallery of Art If you wish for reputation and fame in the world . take every opportunity of advertising yourself. — Oscar Wilde In the future everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes. — attributed to Andy Warhol 1 The Films of Andy Warhol: Stillness, Repetition, and the Surface of Things Andy Warhol’s interest and involvement in film ex- tends back to his childhood days in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Warhol was sickly and frail as a youngster. Illness often kept him bedridden for long periods of time, during which he read movie magazines and followed the lives of Hollywood celebri- ties. He was an avid moviegoer and amassed a large collection of publicity stills of stars given out by local theaters. He also created a movie scrapbook that included a studio portrait of Shirley Temple with the handwritten inscription: “To Andrew Worhola [sic] from Shirley Temple.” By the age of nine, Warhol had received his first camera. Warhol’s interests in cameras, movie projectors, films, the mystery of fame, and the allure of celebrity thus began in his formative years. Many labels attach themselves to Warhol’s work as a filmmaker: documentary, underground, conceptual, experi- mental, improvisational, sexploitation, to name only a few. His film and video output consists of approximately 650 films and 4,000 videos. He made most of his films in the five-year period from 1963 through 1968. These include Sleep (1963), a five- hour-and-twenty-one minute look at a man sleeping; Empire (1964), an eight-hour film of the Empire State Building; Outer and Inner Space (1965), starring Warhol’s muse Edie Sedgwick; and The Chelsea Girls (1966) (codirected by Paul Morrissey), a double-screen film that brought Warhol his greatest com- mercial distribution and success.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bufferin Commercial Gary Needham Bufferin Commercial Refers in Its
    Bufferin Commercial Gary Needham Bufferin Commercial refers in its title to a widely available brand of aspirin. The film is also typical of some of Warhol’s filmmaking practices in 1966 and, I will argue, anticipates Warhol’s philosophy on relations between business and art. In addition to offering some commentary on this relatively unknown film I also want to use Bufferin Commercial to explore some possible ways to explain and account for those filmmaking practices that Warhol described circa 1966 as being deliberately bad; Warhol pretended to be both incompetent and curious about the process of making films and even made a statement on network television advocating ‘bad camerawork.’1 Bufferin Commercial shouldn’t be confused with the other Bufferin (1966), the portrait film Warhol made in collaboration with Gerard Malanga and the subject of Jean Wainwright’s chapter in this volume. Bufferin Commercial is comprised of two 1200 foot thirty-three minute reels. The first reel is without sound (an unintentional accident) and the second reel has sound. There is some uncertainty surrounding the film’s projection history as being either a single screen 66 minute film, listed as 70 minutes in The Filmmaker’s Cooperative Catalogue No.4 (1967), or a double screen projection that would be 33 minutes in duration.2 It was filmed on Wednesday, 14 December 1966 with two cameras that ran simultaneously, one of them operated by Warhol and the other by Paul Morrissey. Bufferin Commercial’s absence from commentary on Warhol’s films may be due to it being one of the few of his sixties films that was an outside agency commission organised by Richard Frank from the Grey advertising agency in New York on behalf of the pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers.
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Warhol's Factory People
    1 Andy Warhol’s Factory People 100 minute Director’s Cut Feature Documentary Version Transcript Opening Montage Sequence Victor Bockris V.O.: “Drella was the perfect name for Warhol in the sixties... the combination of Dracula and Cinderella”. Ultra Violet V.O.: “It’s really Cinema Realité” Taylor Mead V.O.:” We were ‘outré’, avant garde” Brigid Berlin V.O.: “On drugs, on speed, on amphetamine” Mary Woronov V.O.: “He was an enabler” Nico V.O.:” He had the guts to save the Velvet Underground” Lou Reed V.O.: “They hated the music” David Croland V.O.: “People were stealing his work left and right” Viva V.O.: “I think he’s Queen of the pop art.” (laugh). Candy Darling V.O.: “A glittering façade” Ivy Nicholson V.O.: “Silver goes with stars” Andy Warhol: “I don’t have any favorite color because I decided Silver was the only thing around.” Billy Name: This is the factory, and it’s something that you can’t recreate. As when we were making films there with the actual people there, making art there with the actual people there. And that’s my cat, Ruby. Imagine living and working in a place like that! It’s so cool, isn’t it? Ultra Violet: OK. I was born Isabelle Collin Dufresne, and I became Ultra violet in 1963 when I met Andy Warhol. Then I turned totally violet, from my toes to the tip of my hair. And to this day, what’s amazing, I’m aging, but my hair is naturally turning violet.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Popism: the Warhol Sixties
    POPISM: THE WARHOL SIXTIES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Andy Warhol,Pat Hackett | 416 pages | 21 Jun 2011 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141189420 | English | London, United Kingdom POPism: The Warhol Sixties PDF Book You also see an unseemly side of Andy when he talks about how he wished Ondine stayed on drugs. Grass is always greener, I guess. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Add to Wishlist. Refresh and try again. Teenager Moss Trawnley is in desperate need of work, and so he decides to head Sep 28, Lauren added it. If I'm kiddish, I'd have to say I like myself this way. As his life becomes increasingly less about the art and more about the circus the art creates — which becomes its own kind of art. Paperback , pages. About Andy Warhol. Studying for a degree in literature means a lot of reading throughout the day, often heavy critical material, and so to relax I read "readable" fiction, such as crime and noir novels. Would not recommend the book. You feel the excitement and madness of that period, get acquianted with the best "it" people of that transformation, from gallery curators and artist to musicians, writers and actors. What an impossible dream.. Does it make me a fan? My father had the first copy of this book that I read many times. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. The Accidental President: Harry S. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By the end of the book one feels that by the end of the sixties , everyone was just sick of everything.
    [Show full text]