DOCSLIB.ORG

Network Specification North West and Central Route 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Network Specification North West and Central Route 2020 Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Network Specification 2020 North West and Central (NW&C) region 8 The information in this document is checked regularly and is as accurate as possible; however the railway is an ever changing environment: service patterns can change quickly, particularly in freight markets, and the exact details of investment spend may fluctuate over time. In particular, following the effects of Covid -19, the services on the railway network might be different from those that were originally planned. You are advised to seek advice from [email protected] if you wish to check the accuracy of any information contained in this document. Network Specification: • better address the region’s business needs • feed refranchising by considering strategic North West and Central questions at the right time in the franchising cycle such that any choices presented can be (NW&C) region considered before the invitation to tender stage of future franchises Incorporates Strategic Routes: • recognise and where appropriate influence industry policy in other areas such as rolling stock M: West Midlands and Chilterns strategy, technology strategy, and environmental N: West Coast Main Line sustainability O: Merseyside • employ a more effective, focussed means of H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire and Humber consultation and North West (North West section) • provide more granular, targeted market insight • develop a ‘service change’ pipeline for future This Network Specification describes the geography configuration states of the North West and Central region, comprising three subsidiary routes: North West, Central, and • demonstrably focus on incremental opportunities West Coast Main Line (South). This document and service trade-offs. outlines train service provision to meet current and future passenger markets and traffic flows for the The outputs of the process will provide options to freight business. It identifies infrastructure choices for funders which will inform the enhancement pipeline funders to meet future growth for the medium to and upcoming franchise decisions. long term over the next thirty years. Figure 1 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning The Network Specification refers to Strategic Route Specifications (SRSs). SRSs cover specific sections and/or corridors of the route and are published as appendices to this document. They describe, in greater detail, the current and future requirements of each SRS to inform both internal and external stakeholders of the strategy for the North West and Central region. Prior to Control Period six (CP6, which covers 2019 to 2024) the Long Term Planning Process produced a number of market studies which forecast future demand for each market. These studies informed the development of route studies, which set out choices for funders for ways to accommodate forecast level of demand. Whilst CMSP has been designed to enable strategic In CP6 we have changed the way that Network Rail planning activity to be undertaken without the undertakes long-term planning in response to constraint of regional boundaries, there are some stakeholder feedback, moving away from producing planning activities where the network has to be route studies (undertaken on a rolling basis in each considered as a whole. Further information is on Control Period) to a more flexible and modular pages 13 and 14. approach that develops options for funders. These range from the application of wider This is called Continuous Modular Strategic Planning government policies and consideration of how to (CMSP), and is underpinned by the development of influence these environmental and sustainability an annual plan of strategic questions which will: challenges, through changing population demographics, to the introduction of new • explicitly put passenger and freight users at the technologies both to the railway system itself and heart of the process more widely. 1 Strategic Route context Strategic Route O: Merseyside The North West and Central (NW&C) region is the The Merseyrail network is an entirely third rail Direct biggest single region within Network Rail and covers Current (DC) electrified network spread over the over 24 per cent of the national rail network. Wirral, Merseyside, north Cheshire and south-west Lancashire. The network is split in two as the Northern The NW&C region: Line and the Wirral Line. The Northern Line operates from Hunts Cross in the south to Liverpool Central • is 24 per cent of Britain’s railway and Moorfields, with northerly branches serving • runs around 6,725 train services each weekday Southport, Kirkby and Ormskirk. There are four • generates nearly 250 million annual passenger terminus stations on the Wirral Line: New Brighton, journeys West Kirkby, Chester and Ellesmere Port. All stations • moves 700,000 tonnes of freight each week on this route are connected to Hamilton Square in • maintains 7,100 bridges Birkenhead, and the central Liverpool stations. There • operates 712 level crossings is a one-way, clockwise loop line underneath Liverpool • controls services from 150 signal boxes city centre which serves the central stations of James • looks after 571 stations Street, Moorfields, Liverpool Lime Street and Liverpool • covers 4,500 track miles Central. Liverpool Lime Street Low Level forms an • employs nearly 8,000 people. important link to the mainline Liverpool Lime Street station, redeveloped in 2018, for interchange with There are four Network Rail Managed Stations: services to a wide range of destinations such as London Euston, Birmingham New Street, Manchester London, Manchester, Glasgow, Newcastle and Piccadilly and Liverpool Lime Street. Norwich. Due to an increase in demand at Liverpool Central, especially on the Northern Line, mitigation The NW&C region accommodates the operations of strategies are currently being developed to help over six freight operators and fourteen passenger address the increased demand. operators, and a small number of charter train operators. Strategic Route H: North West – Urban The NW&C region follows the West Coast Main The North West Urban rail area covers a wide Line from London Euston to the Scottish Borders, geographical spread which has a large number of city and incorporates a number of major commuter, conurbations offering opportunities for employment, intercity and local routes linking London with: leisure and education. The area includes routes into Watford, Milton Keynes, Northampton, Coventry, stations in the principal locations, such as central Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Preston, Manchester, central Liverpool and Manchester Carlisle and Scotland. The region also covers the Airport; with various radial routes extending into Chilterns area from London Marylebone to Blackpool, Cheshire, Lancashire and Derbyshire. Birmingham Snow Hill, and the whole of the West Transport for the North (TfN) is the voice for Midlands area. The West Coast Main Line diverges transport in the north of England and plays a key role at Crewe, where the line runs to Chester. Chester in driving the strategic growth of the rail network acts as a gateway to north Wales. supporting Local Transport Authorities to ensure strategic transport decisions are informed by local The Strategic Routes that make up the North West requirements. and Central region are defined as; • Route O: Merseyside Strategic Route H: North West – Rural • Route H: North West • Route N: West Coast Main Line The North West Rural area broadly covers the • Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns. railway north of the line between Preston and Burnley as far as Carlisle, with the exception of the These routes serve a variety of markets to tourist West Coast Main Line, and the lines east of destinations, allowing leisure travel and serving vital Skipton. It encompasses the rail routes within the commuting into the towns and cities of northern county of Cumbria and a number in north England. Lancashire. The key routes run along the Cumbrian coast, between Settle and Carlisle, between Preston and Ormskirk, and between Preston and Burnley via Blackburn. 2 Strategic Route N: West Coast Main Line Coventry stations are primary interchange stations for longer-distance services on the West Coast Main The West Coast Main Line (WCML) is nearly 600km Line and on the cross-country network, as well as long and stretches from London Euston to Glasgow being termini for local commuter services. Central. For strategic planning purposes, the route to Carstairs South junction (although in Scotland) is There is one line classified as rural: the Stratford- included in the North West and Central region, while upon-Avon line, which includes the single-track branch the Carstairs to Glasgow Central section is included in line from Bearley junction to Hatton junctions. Scotland’s Railway. The WCML connects London to Birmingham and the Midlands, Manchester, the Strategic Route M: Chiltern Lines North West, and Scotland. The Chiltern Main Line runs from London Marylebone The WCML is recognised as a strategic transport to Birmingham Snow Hill via High Wycombe, Princes corridor linking Europe (through the Channel Tunnel) Risborough, Bicester, Banbury, Leamington Spa and via London and south-east England to the West Solihull. Midlands, north-west England and Scotland, and is the UK’s busiest mixed traffic route. The European At Neasden South junction the line diverges towards and international importance of the WCML is Aylesbury Vale Parkway so that services can run from reflected in its designation as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West Main Line Strategic Study 3 MB
    OFFICIAL South West Main Line Strategic Study Phase 1 2021 1 OFFICIAL Network Rail Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Long-Term Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 The South West Main Line Today................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Strategic Context ..............................................................................................................................................13 5.0 South West Main Line - Demand ................................................................................................................25 6.0 Capacity Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................34 7.0 Intervention Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................59 8.0 Emerging Strategic Advice ............................................................................................................................62 Appendix A – Safety Baseline .....................................................................................................................................74 Appendix B – Development
    [Show full text]
  • Rf LTW Chiltern Response
    campaigning by the Railway Development Society Limited Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes Response from Railfuture 1. Introduction Railfuture is pleased to respond to the London TravelWatch document regarding the Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes. Our comments will be brief and to the point. Railfuture is the campaigning name of the Railway Development Society Limited, a (not for profit) Limited Company organised in England as twelve regional branches plus two national branches in Scotland and Wales. This coordinated response has been compiled by Railfuture London & South East, and has been agreed with Railfuture Thames Valley for those sections of line in their area (Amersham to Aylesbury and West Ruislip to Bicester North). 2. General Comments Railfuture welcomes the initiative from LTW to suggest ways of raising standards of service on Chiltern Railways services in London and South East. We note the work that has gone into gathering the detail on network capacity and existing services. Chiltern is unique for a number of reasons: its close working relationship and shared infrastructure with London Underground (LU) on the Aylesbury Line; the close proximity of other LU and London Bus services to many Chiltern ‘metro’ stations on the High Wycombe line; the close mix of short and medium distance commuter traffic and the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone. It is equally unique for the impressive increase in patronage generated by reliable modern rolling stock and infrastructure; the benefits of a long-term franchise agreement and an imaginative customer oriented professional management team. It is also inhibited by many of the factors that make it unique! These range from the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone, to a lack of infrastructure between Wembley and West Ruislip.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rail Conditions of Travel
    i National Rail Conditions of Travel From 5 August 2018 NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL TABLE OF CONTENTS NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL Part A: A summary of the Conditions 3 Part B: Introduction 4 Conditions 5 Part C: Planning your journey and buying your Ticket 5 Part D: Using your Ticket 11 Part E: Making your Train Journey 15 Part F: Your refund and compensation rights 21 Part G: Special Conditions applying to Season Tickets 26 Part H: Lost Property 29 Appendix A: List of Train Companies to which the National Rail Conditions of Travel apply as at 5 August 2018 30 Appendix B: Definitions 31 Appendix C: Code of Practice: Arrangements for interview meetings with applicants in connection with duplicate season tickets 33 These National Rail Conditions of Travel apply from 5 August 2018. Any reference to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage on websites, Tickets, publications etc. refers to these National Rail Conditions of Travel. Part A: A summary of the Conditions The terms and conditions of these National Rail Conditions of Travel are set out below in Part C to Part H (the “Conditions”). They comprise the binding contract that comes into effect between you and the Train Companies1 that provide scheduled rail services on the National Rail Network, when you purchase a Ticket. This summary provides a quick overview of the key responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers contained in the contract. It is important, however, that you read the Conditions if you want a full understanding of the responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Capacity Statement
    Framework Capacity Statement Network Rail December 2016 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 1 Contents 1. Purpose 1.1 Purpose 4 2. National overview 2.1 Infrastructure covered by this statement 6 2.2 Framework agreements in Great Britain 7 2.3 Capacity allocation in Great Britain 9 2.4 National capacity overview – who operates where 10 2.5 National capacity overview – who operates when 16 3. Network Rail’s Routes 3.1 Anglia Route 19 3.2 London North East & East Midlands Route 20 3.3 London North Western Route 22 3.4 Scotland Route 24 3.5 South East Route 25 3.6 Wales Routes 27 3.7 Wessex Route 28 3.8 Western Route 29 4. Sub-route and cross-route data 4.1 Strategic Routes / Strategic Route Sections 31 4.2 Constant Traffic Sections 36 Annex: consultation on alternative approaches A.1 Questions of interpretation of the requirement 39 A.2 Potential solutions 40 A.3 Questions for stakeholders 40 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 2 1. Purpose Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 3 1.1 Purpose the form in which data may be presented. The contracts containing the access rights are publicly available elsewhere, and links are provided in This statement is published alongside Network Rail’s Network Statement section 2.2. However, the way in which the rights are described when in order to meet the requirements of European Commission Implementing combined on the geography of the railway network, and over time, to meet Regulation (EU) 2016/545 of 7 April 2016 on procedures and criteria the requirements of the regulation, is open to some interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester Area Strategic Advice 2020
    How can growth and partners’ aspirations be accommodated in the Leicester area over the coming decades? Leicester Area Strategic Advice July 2020 02 Contents 01: Foreword 03 02: Executive Summary 04 03: Continuous Modular Strategic Planning 07 04: Leicester Area Strategic Context 08 05: Delivering Additional Future Services 12 06: Leicester Area Capacity 16 07: Accommodating Future Services 22 08: Recommendations and Next Steps 27 Photo credits: Front cover - lower left: Jeff Chapman Front cover - lower right: Jamie Squibbs Leicester Area Strategic Advice July 2020 03 01 Foreword The Leicester Area Strategic Advice forms part of the The report was produced collaboratively with inputs railway industry’s Long-Term Planning Process covering from key, interested organisations and considers the the medium-term and long-term planning horizon. impact of planned major programmes such as High Investment in the railway is an aid to long-term Speed 2 (HS2), and the strategies and aspirations of sustainable growth for the Leicester area, supporting bodies such as Leicester City Council, the Department economic, social and environmental objectives. of Transport (DfT), Midlands Connect and the Train Network Rail has worked collaboratively with rail and Freight Operating Companies. industry stakeholders and partners to develop long- The recommendations from this report support term plans for a safe, reliable and efficient railway to Network Rail’s focus of putting passengers first by support economic growth across Britain. aiming to increase the number of direct services from This study has considered the impact of increased Leicester Station, supporting freight growth and demand for passenger services in the medium and improving performance and satisfaction with the rail long term, starting from a baseline of today’s railway, network.
    [Show full text]
  • 11797 Mersey Gateway Regeneration Map Plus[Proof]
    IMPACT AREAS SUMMARY MERSEY GATEWAY 1 West Runcorn Employment Growth Area 6 Southern Widnes 8 Runcorn Old Town Centre plus Gorsey Point LCR Growth Sector Focus: Advanced Manufacturing LCR Growth Sector Focus: Advanced Manufacturing / LCR Growth Sector Focus: Visitor Economy / Financial & Widnes REGENERATION PLAN / Low Carbon Energy Financial & Professional Services Professional Services Waterfront New & Renewed Employment Land: 82 Hectares New & Renewed Employment Land: 12 Hectares New & Renewed Employment Land: 6.3 Hectares Link Key Sites: New Homes: 215 New Homes: 530 • 22 Ha Port Of Runcorn Expansion Land Key Sites: Key Sites: Everite Road Widnes Gorsey Point • 20 Ha Port Of Weston • 5 Ha Moor Lane Roadside Commercial Frontage • Runcorn Station Quarter, 4Ha Mixed Use Retail Employment Gyratory • 30 Ha+ INOVYN World Class Chemical & Energy • 3 Ha Moor Lane / Victoria Road Housing Opportunity Area & Commercial Development Renewal Area Remodelling Hub - Serviced Plots • 4 Ha Ditton Road East Employment Renewal Area • Runcorn Old Town Centre Retail, Leisure & Connectivity Opportunities: Connectivity Opportunities: Commercial Opportunities Widnes Golf Academy 5 • Weston Point Expressway Reconfiguration • Silver Jubilee Bridge Sustainable Transport • Old Town Catchment Residential Opportunities • Rail Freight Connectivity & Sidings Corridor (Victoria Road section) Connectivity Opportunities: 6 • Moor Lane Street Scene Enhancement • Runcorn Station Multi-Modal Passenger 3MG Phase 3 West Widnes Halton Lea Healthy New Town Transport Hub & Improved
    [Show full text]
  • Moseley in the Nineteenth Century: Transport
    Moseley in the Nineteenth Century: Transport. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Moseley was a small, rural, idyllic village. By the end of the century, Moseley had changed considerably. One regular visitor to Moseley, Thomas Anderton, writing in 1900, recalled Moseley in the early 1840s and described the changes (Illustration 1):1 As for Moseley . it was a pretty little village in those days. The old village green, the rustic country inns (of which the "Fighting Cocks" was the chief), and some low-roofed, old-fashioned houses, backed by the parish church tower, made up a picture which still remains in my mind's eye. Beyond Moseley Church was a pretty road to Moseley Wake Green, in which were, if I remember rightly, one or two timbered houses and some old-fashioned residences, surrounded by high trees. Many of these have now disappeared. In another direction from the church was a country road running to Sparkbrook, and near which were an important house and lands belonging to the wealthy Misses Anderton, whose possessions have been heard of in more recent days. I now often visit Moseley, and change, but not decay, in all around I see. The prevailing colour of the old village green is now red brick, and the modern colour does not agree so well with my vision as the more rustic tones of a bygone day; whilst the noise and bustle of tram cars, the swarms of suburban residents that emerge from the railway station (especially at certain times in the day), are fast wiping out the peaceful, pretty Moseley of my youthful days.
    [Show full text]
  • Coridor-Yr-M4-O-Amgylch-Casnewydd
    PROSIECT CORIDOR YR M4 O AMGYLCH CASNEWYDD THE M4 CORRIDOR AROUND NEWPORT PROJECT Malpas Llandifog/ Twneli Caerllion/ Caerleon Llandevaud B Brynglas/ 4 A 2 3 NCN 4 4 Newidiadau Arfaethedig i 6 9 6 Brynglas 44 7 Drefniant Mynediad/ A N tunnels C Proposed Access Changes 48 N Pontymister A 4 (! M4 C25/ J25 6 0m M4 C24/ J24 M4 C26/ J26 2 p h 4 h (! (! p 0 Llanfarthin/ Sir Fynwy/ / 0m 4 u A th 6 70 M4 Llanmartin Monmouthshire ar m Pr sb d ph Ex ese Gorsaf y Ty-Du/ do ifie isti nn ild ss h ng ol i Rogerstone A la p M4 'w A i'w ec 0m to ild Station ol R 7 Sain Silian/ be do nn be Re sba Saint-y-brid/ e to St. Julians cla rth res 4 ss u/ St Brides P M 6 Underwood ifi 9 ed 4 ng 5 Ardal Gadwraeth B M ti 4 Netherwent 4 is 5 x B Llanfihangel Rogiet/ 9 E 7 Tanbont 1 23 Llanfihangel Rogiet B4 'St Brides Road' Tanbont Conservation Area t/ Underbridge en Gwasanaethau 'Rockfield Lane' w ow Gorsaf Casnewydd/ Trosbont -G st Underbridge as p Traffordd/ I G he Newport Station C 4 'Knollbury Lane' o N Motorway T Overbridge N C nol/ C N Services M4 C23/ sen N Cyngor Dinas Casnewydd M48 Pre 4 Llanwern J23/ M48 48 Wilcrick sting M 45 Exi B42 Newport City Council Darperir troedffordd/llwybr beiciau ar hyd Newport Road/ M4 C27/ J27 M4 C23A/ J23A Llanfihangel Casnewydd/ Footpath/ Cycleway Provided Along Newport Road (! Gorsaf Pheilffordd Cyffordd Twnnel Hafren/ A (! 468 Ty-Du/ Parcio a Theithio Arfaethedig Trosbont Rogiet/ Severn Tunnel Junction Railway Station Newport B4245 Grorsaf Llanwern/ Trefesgob/ 'Newport Road' Rogiet Rogerstone 4 Proposed Llanwern Overbridge
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Party Funding
    THIRD PARTY FUNDING IS WORKING IAN BAXTER, Strategy Director at SLC Rail, cheers enterprising local authorities and other third parties making things happen on Britain’s complex railway n 20 January 1961, John F. Kennedy used being delivered as central government seeks be up to them to lead change, work out how his inaugural speech as US President more external investment in the railway. to deliver it and lever in external investment Oto encourage a change in the way of into the railway. It is no longer safe to assume thinking of the citizens he was to serve. ‘Ask DEVOLUTION that central government, Network Rail or not what your country can do for you,’ intoned So, the theme today is: ‘Ask not what the train operators will do this for them. JFK, ‘but what you can do for your country.’ the railway can do for you but what However, it hardly needs to be said, least of Such a radical suggestion neatly sums up you can do for the railway’. all to those newly empowered local railway the similar change of approach represented Central government will sponsor, develop, promoters themselves, enthusiastic or sceptical, collectively by the Department for Transport’s fund and deliver strategic railway projects that the railway is a complex entity. That March 2018 ‘Rail Network Enhancements required for UK plc, such as High Speed 2, applies not only in its geographical reach, Pipeline’ (RNEP) process, Network Rail’s ‘Open for electrification, long-distance rolling stock scale and infrastructure, but also in its regularly Business’ initiative and the ongoing progress of replacement or regeneration at major stations reviewed post-privatisation organisation, often devolution of railway planning and investment like London Bridge, Reading or Birmingham New competing or contradictory objectives, multiple to the Scottish and Welsh governments, Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Response with Appendices
    Defendant’s Response to Sole Reference Ref: TTP1546 1 of 9 1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows:- (a) Freightliner Limited whose Registered Office is at 3rd Floor, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ (“Freightliner”) ("the Claimant"); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN ("Network Rail") ("the Defendant"). 1.2 Other Train and Freight Operating Companies that could be affected by the outcome of this dispute: (a) Greater Anglia (Abellio East Anglia Ltd), MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Ltd, Arriva Rail London Ltd, GB Railfreight Ltd, DB Cargo (UK) Ltd, c2c (Trenitalia c2c Ltd) 2 CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT This Response to the Claimant’s Sole Reference includes:- (a) Confirmation, or qualification, that the subject matter of the dispute is as set out by the Claimant in its Sole Reference, in the form of a summary schedule cross-referenced to the issues raised by the Claimant in the Sole Reference, identifying which the Defendant agrees with and which it disagrees with. (b) A detailed explanation of the Defendant’s arguments in support of its position on those issues where it disagrees with the Claimant’s Sole Reference, including references to documents or contractual provisions not dealt with in the Claimant’s Sole Reference. (c) Any further related issues not raised by the Claimant but which the Defendant considers fall to be determined as part of the dispute; (d) The decisions of principle sought from the Panel in respect of (i) legal entitlement, and (ii) remedies; (e) Appendices and other supporting material.
    [Show full text]