DOCSLIB.ORG

The Khoekhoen of the Breede River Swellendam an Archaeological and Historical Landscape Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Khoekhoen of the Breede River Swellendam an Archaeological and Historical Landscape Study The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University The Khoekhoen of the Breede River Swellendam: an archaeological and historical landscape study Charles Ian Arthur Town Thesis presented for the degree of Master of Science Department of Archaeology University of Cape Town Cape Marchof 2008 University The Khoekhoen of the Breede River Swellendam an archaeological and historical landscape study Abstract This thesis investigates the archaeological visibility of indigenous herders in the Swellendam area of the Western Cape. The primary aim is to develop a methodology that combines the analysis of historical documents with archaeological survey. The literature review finds that the dominant model of 'hunter' 'herder' identity has favoured deep stratified midden sites at the expense of low density sites and the open landscape. The model is also linked to the persistence of outdated typological analysis and the lack of research into post-contact indigenous archaeology. Historical sources are reviewed in terms of their potential for developing archaeologicalTown questions as well as for designing a survey. A small section of the Breede River is identified that includes a number of locations with specific reference to Khoekhoen settlement in the 17th and 18th Centuries. Thirty seven open air sitesCape are reported from survey in this area Three large surface concentrations of indigenous pottery and a stone and aloe enclosure are chosen for a further phase of investigation consisting of surface collection and test excavation. The spatial plotting of two surface sites demonstrates that individual and datable hearths can be recognised in the plough zone. The discussion focuses on methodological issues and the potential of the archaeological data to contribute to questions concerning pastoralist visibility, mobility, social organisation and interactionUniversity between Khoekhoen and colonists in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Declaration This work has not been previously submitted in whole, or in part, for the award of any degree. It is my own work. Each significant contribution to, and quotation in, this dissertation from the work, or works, of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the help of numerous friends. Philip Hine, Alex Mackay, Ara Wells, Will Archer and Brian Stewart, accompanied me on more than one survey outing. Thank you. Thanks also to Tim Hart and Dave Halket for suggesting the Breede River as a study area. Translations Townwere expertly done by Fionna Clayton and Philip Hine. Specialist knowledge was generously given by Alex Mackay on flaked stone technology; Karim Sadr on indigenous pottery and Jane Klose on European manufactured ceramics. In termsCape of thesis content, I would like to thank Andy Smith for expert supervision. Also, Peter Mitchell and Antonia Malan for reading and commenting on earlier versions.of In Swellendam there were many who were on hand to offer advice and friendship, especially Tizzie Mangiagalli and Peter Gratton and all the staff at the Drostdy Museum and Bontebok National Park. Thank you too to all the landowners and farm workers in the Swellendam region, especially Winjard Viljoen and James O'Kennedy who granted permission to collect artefacts. Special thanks goesUniversity to Mum, Alan, Dad, Tom and Jan for providing love and support. ii Contents 1. The problem of the 'invisible herder' .................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................ , ............ 1 1.2. Absence of evidence or evidence of absence? ................................................... .4 1.3. Chapter outline ................................................................................... ~ ................ 9 2. Literature Review .................................................................................................. 13 2.1. Labels in archaeology ....................................................................................... 13 2.2. Theory and method in pastoralist archaeology ................................................. 15 2.3. The quest for a herder 'type' ............................................................................. 17 2.4. Hunters or herders? ........................................................................................... 19 2.5. The revisionist argument .................................................................................. 23 2.6. The herder package ........................................................................................... 24 2.7. Twenty years on ................................................................................................ 28 2.8.1. Testing the dichotomy model: Variation in time and place ........................... 29 2.8.2. Functional considerations .............................................................................. 31 2.9.1. Future directions 1: Beyond the formal! informal dichotomy ....................... 32 2.9.3. Future directions 3: The importance oflow density and ploughzone archaeology ..............................................................................................................Town 41 2.10. New perspectives on the development ofpastoralism ................................... .44 2.11. Concluding remarks ........................................................................................ 46 3. The Khoekhoen of Swell endam 1660-1734 .......................................................... 49 3.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................Cape 49 3.2. Methodology ..................................................................................................... 50 3.3. The expeditions ................................................................................................. 51 3.3.1. Jeronimus Cruse 1668 and 1669 ....................................................................of 52 3.3.2. Laurens Visser 1677 ...................................................................................... 53 3.3.3. Bakkeleys Plaats ............................................................................................ 53 3.3.4. Issac Shrijver 1689 ......................................................................................... 54 3.3.5. The 1690s ....................................................................................................... 55 3.3.6. The Opening up of the Stock Trade ............................................................... 56 3.3.7. Jan Hartogh 1707 ........................................................................................... 56 3.3.8. The colony advances 1707-1734 ................................................................... 56 3.4. Potential for Universityreconstructing Khoekhoen settlement patterns ............................ 58 3.5. Implications for current survey design ............................................................. 64 3.6. Environmentallimi1p.tions for pastoralism on the south coastal plain .............. 64 4: The Khoekhoen of Swell endam 1734-1800.......................................................... 67 4.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 67 4.2. The Dispossession ofthe Hessequa .................................................................. 68 4.3.1. A Landscape Perspective: Toponymy and oral histories ............................... 74 4.3.2. Dating and sources of oral history ................................................................. 80 4.3.3. Captains, Colonists, and Company in the 18th Century ................................. 84 4.4. The role of archaeology .................................................................................... 90 4.4.1. Excavations of 18th Century Khoekhoen burial sites by the South African Museum 1980-1986 ................................................................................................. 91 4.4.3. Potential research avenues for post-contact archaeology in Swellendam ..... 94 4.5. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 100 iii 5. Survey design and methodology .............••••••.•••.•••••••.•••••••••••••••.•••••• 103 5.1 Introduction .................................................................... .. 103 5.2. Geology and topography ...................................................... 103 5.3. Soils, vegetation and land-use ................................................ 106 5.4. Known historical and archaeological sites ................................. .. 109 5.5. The survey area defined .......................................................... .. 110 5.6. Survey methodology ........................................................... 112 5.7 Typology ....................................................................... .. 115 6. Survey results .••.••••••...•••••••......•••••••••••••.•..•.••..••.•.•...•.....•........... 116 6.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breede River Estuarine Management Plan
    Breede River Estuarine Management Plan Final Draft June 2016 Breede River Estuary Management Plan i DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document title and version: Breede River Estuarine Management Plan Project Name: Western Cape Estuary Management Framework and Implementation Strategy Client: Western Cape Government, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Royal HaskoningDHV reference number: MD1819 Authority reference: EADP 1/2015 Compiled by: SSI Environmental (1st Edition, revised 2011), Royal HaskoningDHV (2nd Edition, 2016) Acknowledgements: C.A.P.E. Cape Action for People and the Environment CapeNature Western Cape Government Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Chief Directorate: Environmental Sustainability Directorate: Biodiversity and Coastal Management Email: [email protected] Date: June 2016 Breede River Estuarine Management Plan Breede River Estuarine Management Plan i DOCUMENT USE The National Estuarine Management Protocol (the Protocol), promulgated in May 2013 under the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act (Act No. 24 of 2008, as amended by Act No. 36 of 2014), sets out the minimum requirements for individual estuarine management plans. In 2014, a review was conducted by the National Department of Environmental Affairs: Oceans and Coasts (DEA, 2014) on the existing management plans to ensure, inter alia, the alignment of these plans with the Protocol. This revision of the Draft Breede River Estuarine Management Plan (EMP), including the Situation Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Hessequa Municipality
    GRDM Rep Forum January 2020 HESSEQUA MUNICIPALITY Introduction DEMOGRAPHICS & INSTITUTIONAL INFO Town Growth Rate 2018 Albertinia 3.11% 8393 Gouritsmond 1.16% 539 Jongensfontein 2.33% 389 Heidelberg 1.49% 8762 Towns Melkhoutfontein 5.53% 3141 & Riversdal 2.37% 19982 Slangrivier 2.50% 3324 Growth Stilbaai 1.55% 3737 Witsand 4.90% 389 Rural -0.13% 11525 Total 1.78% 78020 10.0% Load-shedding Aftermath of global financial crisis and domestic Declines in tourism 8.0% electricity crises Commodity price 6.0% Load-shedding Load-shedding SA in recession 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2010 FIFA World Cup -2.0% Deepening drought -4.0% 2018 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 e Kannaland 9.1% -1.4% 1.0% 3.0% 2.6% 2.7% 3.7% 1.3% 0.0% 3.1% 1.1% Hessequa 6.8% -0.6% 1.5% 3.4% 2.9% 3.0% 3.1% 1.2% 0.1% 2.3% 0.4% Mossel Bay 3.5% -0.5% 2.0% 4.2% 3.2% 2.5% 2.1% 1.0% 0.9% 1.1% 0.2% George 5.2% -0.3% 2.7% 4.3% 3.5% 3.2% 2.9% 2.1% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% Oudtshoorn 5.3% -0.6% 2.3% 3.5% 3.0% 3.1% 2.7% 1.3% 0.7% 1.5% 1.1% Bitou 4.5% 0.1% 2.2% 3.3% 2.8% 3.3% 2.4% 1.5% 1.2% 1.3% -0.6% Knysna 3.4% -0.3% 1.1% 2.5% 2.3% 2.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.5% 0.8% -0.9% Garden Route District 4.9% -0.4% 2.1% 3.8% 3.1% 2.9% 2.6% 1.5% 1.0% 1.5% 0.8% Western Cape Province 4.1% -1.3% 2.3% 3.8% 2.9% 2.6% 2.4% 1.4% 1.1% 1.2% 0.9% Access to Services & Economic Sectors Unemployment Institutional Overview Senior Management Experienced and Stable Technical Director Appointment Process is underway 6th Clean Audit Outcome Challenge to Comply with existing resources – No new posts can be funded – Cost of Services Risk Driven IDP & Budget Process Investment in Growth Infrastructure Addressing Backlogs Mitigating Risk: Fire & ICT Expenditure Information CAPEX & OPEX OVERVIEW Projects & Programmes - 1 Capital Expenditure challenge has been resolved: Multi- year tender for appointment of Civil Engineers successfully completed CAPEX reported on S72 Report as 13.8% Commitments already registered on System, as projects are completed the expenditure will increase drastically.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Water Quality
    Western Cape IWRM Action Plan: Status Quo Report Final Draft 7. WATER QUALITY 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.1.1 What is water quality? “Water quality” is a term used to express the suitability of water to sustain various uses, such as agricultural, domestic, recreational, and industrial, or aquatic ecosystem processes. A particular use or process will have certain requirements for the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of water; for example limits on the concentrations of toxic substances for drinking water use, or restrictions on temperature and pH ranges for water supporting invertebrate communities. Consequently, water quality can be defined by a range of variables which limit water use by comparing the physical and chemical characteristics of a water sample with water quality guidelines or standards. Although many uses have some common requirements for certain variables, each use will have its own demands and influences on water quality. Water quality is neither a static condition of a system, nor can it be defined by the measurement of only one parameter. Rather, it is variable in both time and space and requires routine monitoring to detect spatial patterns and changes over time. The composition of surface and groundwater is dependent on natural factors (geological, topographical, meteorological, hydrological, and biological) in the drainage basin and varies with seasonal differences in runoff volumes, weather conditions, and water levels. Large natural variations in water quality may, therefore, be observed even where only a single water resource is involved. Human intervention also has significant effects on water quality. Some of these effects are the result of hydrological changes, such as the building of dams, draining of wetlands, and diversion of flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit for Integrating Land Reform & Rural Development
    FIRE FIRE A TOOLKIT FOR INTEGRATING LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT INTO SPATIAL AND LAND USE PLANNING APRIL 2021 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND . 3 2. NATIONAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING . 3 3. PURPOSE AND USE OF THE TOOLKIT . 6 4. PART 1: LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT . 8 5. PART 2: INSTRUMENTS TO FACILITATE LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT . 8 6. PART 3: RURAL LAND USE OPTIONS TO IMPLEMENT LAND REFORM PROJECTS . 9 7. PART 4: TRANSFORMATION OF CERTAIN RURAL AREAS (TRANCRAA) . 9 PART 1: LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT . 10 1. NATIONAL ACTS AND POLICIES . 10 2. PROVINCIAL POLICY . 18 PART 2: INSTRUMENTS TO FACILITATE LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT . 34 PART 3: RURAL LAND USE OPTIONS TO IMPLEMENT LAND REFORM PROJECTS . 57 PART 4: TRANSFORMATION OF CERTAIN RURAL AREAS (TRANCRAA) . 64 1. INTRODUCTION . 64 2. OBJECTIVE . 64 3. STATUS QUO OF THE RURAL AREAS . 65 FIRE A TOOLKIT FOR INTEGRATING LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2 INTO SPATIAL AND LAND USE PLANNING 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA) requires of Spatial Development Frameworks (SDFs) to include rural areas and to address the inclusion and integration thereof into spatial, economic, social and environmental objectives . It further states that SDFs should address historical spatial imbalances in development and provide direction for strategic developments, infrastructure investment, promote efficient, sustainable and planned investments by all sectors and indicate priority areas for investment in land development . The Western Cape Land Use Planning Guideline: Rural Areas of 2019 (Rural Areas Guideline) serves as a basis for development management to improve the planning and management of rural areas in support of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework, 2014 (PSDF) and its policy to diversify and strengthen the rural economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Drakenstein Heritage Survey Reports
    DRAKENSTEIN HERITAGE SURVEY VOLUME 1: HERITAGE SURVEY REPORT October 2012 Prepared by the Drakenstein Landscape Group for the Drakenstein Municipality P O BOX 281 MUIZENBERG 7950 Sarah Winter Tel: (021) 788-9313 Fax:(021) 788-2871 Cell: 082 4210 510 E-mail: [email protected] Sarah Winter BA MCRP (UCT) Nicolas Baumann BA MCRP (UCT) MSc (OxBr) D.Phil(York) TRP(SA) MSAPI, MRTPI Graham Jacobs BArch (UCT) MA Conservation Studies (York) Pr Arch MI Arch CIA Melanie Attwell BA (Hons) Hed (UCT) Dip. Arch. Conservation (ICCROM) Acknowledgements The Drakenstein Heritage Survey has been undertaken with the invaluable input and guidance from the following municipal officials: Chantelle de Kock, Snr Heritage Officer Janine Penfold, GIS officer David Delaney, HOD Planning Services Anthea Shortles, Manager: Spatial Planning Henk Strydom, Manager: Land Use The input and comment of the following local heritage organizations is also kindly acknowledged. Drakenstein Heritage Foundation Paarl 300 Foundation LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations have been used: General abbreviations HOZ: Heritage Overlay Zone HWC: Heritage Western Cape LUPO: Land Use Planning Ordinance NHRA: The National Heritage Resources act (Act 25 of 1999) PHA: Provincial Heritage Authority PHS: Provincial Heritage Site SAHRA: The South African Heritage Resources Agency List of abbreviations used in the database Significance H: Historical Significance Ar: Architectural Significance A: Aesthetic Significance Cx: Contextual Significance S: Social Significance Sc: Scientific Significance Sp: Spiritual Significance L: Linguistic Significance Lm: Landmark Significance T: Technological Significance Descriptions/Comment ci: Cast Iron conc.: concrete cor iron: Corrugated iron d/s: double sliding (normally for sash windows) fb: facebrick med: medium m: metal pl: plastered pc: pre-cast (normally concrete) s/s: single storey Th: thatch St: stone Dating 18C: Eighteenth Century 19C: Nineteenth Century 20C: Twentieth Century E: Early e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Port Beaufort & Malgas
    TIMELINE FOR PORT BEAUFORT & MALGAS 1488: The Portuguese recognized the Breede River Mouth as the finest natural anchorage on the whole southern seaboard of Africa. 1576: King Sebastian’s navigator, Manuel De Mesquita Perestrello called the bay, St. Sebastian’s Bay, after “Dom Sebastiao, the most serene King of Portugal”, and the west bank “Cape Infanta”. 1790: San Sebastian Bay was surveyed by the French sea captain, Captain Duminy. 1798: During May, the Breede River mouth was visited by Lady Anne Barnard and her husband, who was Colonial Secretary under the British Administration, with Jacob Van Reenen of Slang River. 1800: Landrost Anthonie Faure reported to Governor Sir George Young that the river was suitable for navigation “up to six hours inland, with excellent safe loading – places for small vessels along either bank”. 1802: Baron Von Buchenröder visited San Sebastian’s Bay, crossed the river in a small boat and pronounced it “only three to four feet deep at low tide, thus only suitable for sloops and long flat vessels, such as one sees on the Main, Nekker and Weser in Germany”. He also found an English ship anchored in the Breede River. 1803: Dirk Gysbert Van Reenen gave the same advice (as Baron Von Buchenröder) to General Janssens. 1813: Malagas got its name from the farm belonging to Adriaan Odendaal, “Malagas Craal gelegen aan de Breede River” which took its name from a former Khoikhoi Chief. 1817: It was found that the bar was navigable by vessels displacing not more than six feet of water. Lord Charles Somerset named the east bank of Breede River after the title of his father, the 5th Duke of Beaufort.
    [Show full text]
  • Breede River Basin Study. Groundwater Assessment
    DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY BREEDE RIVER BASIN STUDY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT Final MAY 2003 Groundwater Consulting Services P O Box 2597 Rivonia 2128 Tel : +27 11 803 5726 Fax : +27 11 803 5745 e-mail : [email protected] This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as : Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. 2003. Groundwater Assessment. Prepared by G Papini of Groundwater Consulting Services as part of the Breede River Basin Study. DWAF Report No. PH 00/00/2502. BREEDE RIVER BASIN STUDY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objectives of this study were to assess the significance and distribution of groundwater resources in the Breede River catchment, estimate the amount of abstraction and degree of stress it may be causing and to indicate the scope for further development of groundwater resources. This was achieved by a review of all available literature and obtaining yields and quantities from all significant schemes. The characterisation of important aquifers and assessment of the groundwater balance (recharge versus consumption) allowed for identification of further groundwater potential. The geohydrology of the Breede River catchment is controlled by the occurrence of the rocks of the Table Mountain Group (which form the mountainous areas), the occurrence of high levels of faulting and folding in the syntaxis area of the upper catchment and the variable rainfall, being highest in the mountainous areas in the west. These factors result in a catchment with highest groundwater potential in the west, where recharge, yields and abstraction potential are greatest and the quality is the best. As a result of these factors, the western half of the catchment is also the area with the greatest groundwater use.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall and River Flow Trends for the Western Cape Province, South Africa
    Rainfall and river flow trends for the Western Cape AUTHORS: Province, South Africa Rakhee Lakhraj-Govender1 Stefan W. Grab2 Climate change has the potential to alter the spatio-temporal distribution of rainfall, subsequently affecting AFFILIATIONS: 1School of Environmental, Water and the supply and demand of water resources. In a water-stressed country such as South Africa, this effect has Earth Sciences, Tshwane University significant consequences. To this end, we investigated annual and winter rainfall and river flow trends for the of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa Western Cape Province over two periods: 1987–2017 and 1960–2017. Annual rainfall for the most recent 2School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University 30-year period shows decreasing trends, with the largest magnitude of decrease at the SA Astronomical of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Observatory rainfall station (-54.38 mm/decade). With the exception of the significant decreasing winter South Africa rainfall trend at Langewens (-34.88 mm/decade), the trends vary between stations for the period 1960– CORRESPONDENCE TO: 2017. For the period 1987–2017, statistically significant decreasing winter trends were found at four of the Rakhee Lakhraj-Govender seven stations, and range from -6.8 mm/decade at Cape Columbine to -34.88 mm/decade at Langewens. Similarly, the magnitudes of decreasing winter river flow at Bree@Ceres and Berg@Franschoek are greater EMAIL: [email protected] for the more recent 30-year period than for 1960–2017. Correlation coefficients for Vilij@Voeliv rainfall and four river flow stations (Berg@Franschoek, Bree@Ceres, Wit River@Drosterkloof and Little Berg@ DATES: Nieuwkloof) are stronger for shorter periods (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Copy « License Modernization «
    Approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget) | OMB Control Number 3060-0113 (REFERENCE COPY - Not for submission) Broadcast Equal Employment Opportunity Program Report FRN: 0030479497 File Number: 0000091762 Submit Date: 11/27/2019 Call Sign: WTBC Facility ID: 731 City: TUSCALOOSA State: AL Service: Full Power AM Purpose: EEO Report Status: Received Status Date: 11/27/2019 Filing Status: Active General Section Question Response Information Application Description Description of the application (255 characters max.) is Tuscaloosa Market EEO visible only to you and is not part of the submitted Report application. It will be displayed in your Applications workspace. Attachments Are attachments (other than associated schedules) being No filed with this application? Licensee Name, Type and Contact Information Licensee Information Applicant Applicant Address Phone Email Type TOWNSQUARE MEDIA TUSCALOOSA 1 +1 (203) Christopher. Company LICENSE, LLC MANHATTANVILLE 861-0900 Kitchen@townsquaremedia. Doing Business As: TOWNSQUARE MEDIA ROAD com TUSCALOOSA LICENSE, LLC SUITE 202 PURCHASE, NY 10577 United States Contact Contact Name Address Phone Email Contact Type Representatives Howard M Liberman 1800 M Street, NW +1 (202) 383- hliberman@wbklaw. Legal Wilkinson Barker Knauer, Suite 800N 3373 com Representative LLP Washington, DC 20036 United States Common Facility Identifier Call Sign City State Time Brokerage Agreement Stations 67577 WQRR REFORM AL No 189495 WALJ NORTHPORT AL No 54795 WTSK TUSCALOOSA AL No 731 WTBC TUSCALOOSA AL No 54797 WFFN
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Newsletter 2016
    Walkerbay Skiboat Club – Winter Newsletter 2016 FROM THE CHAIRMAN’S PEN: Welcome to the twenty new members who have joined the club since December. Some of you have remarked that we have a unique and beautiful club house location and in these days an unusual honesty system. It is true that the trust and respect that our members have for each other and their commitment to the club means that we do not have to employ permanent staff. There is a lot of work involved in running the club and without the help and cooperation of our members it would not be possible. So I hope that you will enjoy what the club offers and get involved in our activities whether it is fishing or social events or helping us keep the club the way we like it. Good news is that we have just renewed our lease for the property. In common with the other harbour users we have a 3 year lease with the option to extend for a further 2 years. The Department of Public works have published a 3 phase development plan which makes provision for us. The third phase includes an extended breakwater and yacht basin with adjacent club premises so our long term future seems assured. Fishing remains at our core and from the reports in this newsletter you will see that our members have had amazing catches and huge enjoyment. It is worth coming on a Friday evening to share in the news. Tight Lines and Happy Days, Walter Mapham. VAN DIE REDAKTEUR: Dit is ‘n voorreg om betrokke te wees by ‘n klub waar lede en die komitee aktief deelneem.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Utionaljst. N- J
    THE 'UTIONALJST. N- J.. THTJB8DAY. ipfwt-r !*' Klopf tba law. Jadn IfoOuraktt rehukil tba p ae4 laipowed a 0n« of MO -od eoatA | Plainfieldifield SocietSocietyy AttendAttend,s thethe!! PtfirfieldPlamflcld BoyBoy.* ArraigneArraignedd fefcr Tfc.lr anwl, am* KmJ*r a M*r*T With Pure Delight Their TwxUf Ackerman Reception. HandlinHandlingg FirearmtFirearm.. PLAY AND MINSTRELSl! f Ackerman Reception. naina*ld OaaasO, TIL Bora) Araaaaat. has Vowt Are Spoken. A SUCCESS IN ALL ITS FUNCTIONS. CAftfofMNtSS SHARPLY CENSURED ULY "ERFUME AND ORANGE BLOOM rdllawtBir la tba rfn^l.] pr^rsopsja. 0> rk* MualF£tM-nf noapitai IVneo^ehteif O-*«Oo» il .I depall tba tout. Tbe wfict that tee IwUftn aeMOa la but a H. U Bullock, admitted by cart trotm FMMM. i rii-t.i i. *beo tbe mantle of and aftar hut «• Rtary F. BiUcrBux q iietBde Is donned by ao- tnaaterred br card from Bomerrille, and > the brill l«ncy and • IN additional proputitioo U W. BerreuV Hra. Irvtoc 19 n given by Mr-.J. B.Acker- W. WaU Henrr L. Ihweit "• V.W. Coaklla had been deouilud br I 10 of I be 0 'untry Club last re Tavgmrt Janea B. Anthanj HWMctGrtnd Deputy to loMall B. a Pn ofaaplala, and Jaajce K. Arnold Benlry. W n bad long been «rntena> d«j. sad Judgtsfnt was p< W B. Brown William B. Coc* •tsaam U.Colburn, tfew Tor*. I a. ikowo aetad at ruide. aad lotrodac ie of the events of tbe s In eevenl ee*ee of more than ordinary lo ftwblcfa wosddbe a lavish tenet- The tfcree PUtofteld boja wb.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resources Protection Plan for the Breede River Catchment in the Western Cape 2017 Western Cape Government
    Environmental Resources Protection Plan for the Breede River Catchment in the Western Cape 2017 WESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE BREEDE RIVER CATCHMENT IN THE WESTERN CAPE 2017 Cover image source: Breede River (Photo: Jason Mingo) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP) Project Sponsors, quality assurance and oversight: Gottlieb Arendse, Chief Director Environmental Quality Wilna Kloppers, Director Pollution and Chemical Management Project leader: Breede River Environmental Resources Protection Plan (ERPP), Zayed Brown Contributors to the Breede River ERPP: Annabel Horn1 Catherine Bill Wilna Kloppers Russell Mehl Nicole Garcia Gunther Franz Zayed Brown Jason Mingo Marlé Kunneke Anthony van Wyk Akhona Ndletyana Helena Jacobs Julien Rumbelow Chantel Hauptfleisch Rudolf Van Jaarsveldt Contributors to plan from Sub-Directorate Spatial Information Management, DEA&DP: Rasivhetshele Bill Nesengani Dalene Stapelberg Contributors to plan from CapeNature: Jeanne Gouws Martine Jordaan Peter Viljoen Contributor to plan from DHS: Louis Welgemoed Contribution on Partnership: EDP 1 Plan edited by Annabel Marian Horn Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] Tel: 021 483 8100 or 079 097 9271 CON NTE TS Ministers Foreword . 1 Introduction2 . 2 The Description of the tasks set out for the Breede River ERPP . 6 TASK 1: Water Quality & River Health Monitoring .......................................... 8 TASK 2: Improve the Performance of Wastewater Treatment
    [Show full text]