DOCSLIB.ORG

In Sonoma County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A VISION FOR LAND CONSERVATION IN SONOMA COUNTY DRAFT REPORT AVAILABILITY Find out more about the Vital Lands Initiative and access digital files for download atwww.vital-lands.org . The most updated version of the plan will be posted there, as well as on the Sonoma County Ag + Open Space website: www.sonomaopenspace.org. SUGGESTED CITATION Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District. 2018. The Vital Lands Initiative. Santa Rosa, CA. ## pages plus appendices. ON THE COVER Text describing the photo on the cover, including “…. Protected forever by the Sonoma Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District Photo byDRAFT [PLACEHOLDER] 2 THE VITAL DRAFT LANDS INITIATIVE A VISION FOR LAND CONSERVATION IN SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY REVIEW DRAFT MARCH 2018 DRAFT SONOMA COUNTY + OPEN AG SPACE 3 Foreword General Manager Foreword Board of Directors Chair Foreword The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (Ag + Placeholder text - to be developed by Director Gore (Assume approx 250 Open Space) was envisioned by the voters of Sonoma County to ensure healthy words) - Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, et eam detraxit inciderint, et cum alia and thriving natural and working lands in Sonoma County. We are honored to alterum. Alii consulatu per at, nam enim conceptam no, erat honestatis ad his. have been entrusted with the community’s vision for a vibrant and beautiful Ut ius omittam deterruisset, mea cu wisi brute impetus. Scaevola assueverit Sonoma County, and every day we work with our partners to implement this sed et, ius esse saepe vocibus ne.Audire deserunt eu qui. Ei nostro splendide vision. We have spent the last year working with the community and our partners constituto pri, ad ius eirmod nominavi. Eu viderer impedit scaevola mel, id sit to develop a shared strategy for the future of land conservation in Sonoma postea utamur docendi. Sed ut nibh mundi prodesset. Ius novum accusata an, County, informed by the best available science and data. We are excited to share pro ne atqui mollis tincidunt, pri an lorem mediocrem adolescens. Eam congue with you the Ag + Open Space Vital Lands Initiative – a comprehensive long- expetenda molestiae eu, mel fuisset eloquentiam comprehensam at. Ei his term strategic plan that will guide our conservation work through 2031. tacimates oportere dignissim, et qui nostrum consulatu. Saperet veritus no qui, ex libris recusabo tractatos usu, quo mundiXernatur? Pa sunt ped qui cuptas Bill Keene dolest quatque debitibusae venducides expland isciam qui incipsandi vid exerit GENERAL MANAGER qui dolesti re, sae prat as aut arum veligendam quiaepudi officipsaes audis conseque con rae odia dolorro beatem volectas accaepta natis endame vel minctotate nihictectur audam rero quia volorep tasperis mil ma cullaboris James Gore DRAFTBOARD CHAIR 4 DRAFT 5 SONOMA COUNTY AG + OPEN SPACE DRAFT Acknowledgments Visionary Voters of Sonoma County. The voters of Sonoma County created Ag + Open Space to protect natural and working lands, choosing to tax themselves to ensure that Sonoma County retains open space lands that maintain the beautiful scenic nature of our county, support family farms and local food, protect our watersheds and native habitats, create recreational opportunities, and maintain greenbelts to ensure the unique character of our cities and towns. Land Conservation Community. Sonoma County is fortunate to have an active, experienced, and well-informed land conservation community that has provided input and feedback about the critical needs and opportunities that exist here. Conservation partners, environmental professionals, and stakeholders have spent hundreds of hours working with us to develop the Vital Lands Initiative. Agricultural Community. Protecting productive agricultural lands is a complicated and nuanced endeavor. Ag + Open Space has cultivated a strong relationship with our local agricultural community, upon whom we rely to provide guidance about how to protect working lands throughout the county. Numerous individuals and organizations helped craft the Vital Lands Initiative, providing valuable insights and guidance in support of the plan. Reviewers, Academics, and Technical Experts. Ag + Open Space worked with experts from diverse fields to ensure that the most up-to-date science and data informed the Vital Lands Initiative. The following individuals and organizations provided technical and scientific input to the Vital Lands Initiative: First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First NameDRAFT Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name First Name Last Name 6 Board of Directors. Ag + Open Space is governed by a Board of Directors, which consists of the five elected County Supervisors, one representing each Supervisorial District. Their leadership and policy direction was instrumental in ensuring that this document reflects the Sonoma County community. The current Ag + Open Space Board of Directors includes: DRAFT Director Susan Gorin | First District Director Shirlee Zane | Third District Director Lynda Hopkins | Fifth District Director David Rabbitt | Second District Director James Gore | Fourth District Advisory Committee. Ag + Open Space is fortunate to be guided by an Advisory Committee. This group provided invaluable suggestions and advice throughout the development of the Vital Lands Initiative, representing a variety of stakeholders and communities throughout the county. At the time of publication, the Advisory Committee includes: Jan McFarland | First District ○John Nagle | Fifth District ○Curt Nichols (Chair Pro Tem) | Business ○Paul Martin | Second District ○Evan Wiig | Fifth District ○Don McEnhill (Vice Chair) | Environment ○Steve Rabinowitsh | Third District ○David Cook | Mayors and Councilmembers ○Cary Fargo | Real Estate ○Elly Grogan | Third District John Dell’Osso (Chair) | Mayors & Councilmembers Halei Trowbridge | Youth ○Bill Smith | Fourth District ○Neysa Hinton | Mayors & Councilmembers Eddie Smith | Youth ○Doug Lipton | Fourth District Tawny Tesconi | Agriculture Fiscal Oversight Commission. Ag + Open Space receives guidance from a Fiscal Oversight Commission, which provides independent fiscal oversight of projects and operations. Their input in the Vital Lands Initiative helped create a logical and clear product. At the time of publication, the Fiscal Oversight Commission includes: Michael J. Sangiacomo | First District Bob Anderson | Fourth District Todd Mendoza | Second District Eric J. Koenigshofer | Fifth District SONOMA COUNTY + OPEN AG SPACE Regina DeDRAFT La Cruz | Third District Jeff Owen | Alternate Commissioner 7 Table Of Contents Introduction Vital Lands Initiative About Ag + Open Space Past, Present, and Future Mission and vision A Vision for Sonoma County Primer on how we accomplish Natural and working lands in 1of Ag + Open Space 2Land Conservation 3our mission 4Sonoma County page xx page xx page xx page xx Local Land Conservation Outcomes on the Land Looking Forward Land protection in Goals, Objectives, Strategies Enacting the Vision 5Sonoma County 6and Performance Indicators 7 page xx page xx page xx Appendix A: Acronyms | Appendix B: Glossary | Appendix C: References | Appendix D: Data Sources & Analysis Methods | Appendix E: Community Engagement Appendix DRAFTF: State & Federal Laws Affecting Local Land Use | Appendix G: Formation Of Ag + Open Space 8 • TABLE OF CONTENT Overview The mission of Ag + Open Space is to permanently protect the diverse agricultural, natural resource, and scenic open space lands of Sonoma County for future DRAFT generations. To successfully accomplish this mission, we need a long-term strategic plan that identifies priorities and guides our conservation actions. This plan, developed with input from our partners and the community, will ensure that we are working together with all stakeholders to best achieve our shared goals of land conservation and the protection of the open spaces that we all value. DRAFT SONOMA COUNTY + OPEN AG SPACE 9 [SECTION ONE] Introduction DRAFT Sonoma County’s natural and working lands provide many benefits to our community: local food, ecosystems that sustain native plant and animal species, greenbelts and scenic vistas that contribute to the beauty and rural quality of our county, and parks and open spaces that allow people to get outside and experience the joy and health benefits of outdoor recreation. In 1990, the visionary voters of Sonoma County formed the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (Ag + Open Space) to ensure that these landscapes, and the benefits that they provide, would be protected forever. Since that time, Ag + Open Space has protected over 114,000 acres of land, achieving many of the priorities of Sonoma County voters, including preserving agricultural productivity, healthy watersheds, functional ecosystems and biodiversity, recreational opportunities, and incredibly beautiful landscapes. DRAFT 10 • INTRODUCTION DRAFT 11 SONOMA COUNTY AG + OPEN SPACE DRAFT INTRODUCTION Ag + Open Space Mission & Vision WHAT IS OPEN SPACE? Open space is an area of land or water that is primarily undeveloped and used DRAFT for the preservation of natural
Recommended publications
  • Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012

    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012

    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012 A guide to resources and services For management and stewardship of the Russian River Watershed © www.robertjanover.com. Russian River & Big Sulphur Creek at Cloverdale, CA. Photo By Robert Janover Production of this directory was made possible through funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Conservation. In addition to this version of the directory, you can find updated versions online at www.sotoyomercd.org Russian River Watershed Directory version September 2012 - 1 - Preface The Sotoyome Resource Conservation District (RCD) has updated our Russian River Watershed directory to assist landowners, residents, professionals, educators, organizations and agencies interested in the many resources available for natural resource management and stewardship throughout the Russian River watershed. In 1997, The Sotoyome RCD compiled the first known resource directory of agencies and organization working in the Russian River Watershed. The directory was an example of an emerging Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) effort to encourage community-based solutions for natural resource management. Since that Photo courtesy of Sonoma County Water Agency time the directory has gone through several updates with our most recent edition being released electronically and re-formatting for ease of use. For more information or to include your organization in the Directory, please contact the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Sotoyome Resource Conservation
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
  • A History of the Salmonid Decline in the Russian River

    A History of the Salmonid Decline in the Russian River

    A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored by Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting August 1996 Steiner Environmental Consulting Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Quality P. O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored By Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 August 1996 (707) 743-1815 (707) 743-1816 f«x [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Introduction This report gathers together the best available information to provide the historical and current status of chinook salmon, coho salmon, pink salmon, and steelhead in the Russian River basin. Although the historical records are limited, all sources depict a river system where the once dominant salmonids have declined dramatically. The last 150 years of human activities have transformed the Russian River basin into a watershed heavily altered by agriculture and urban development. Flows in the main river channel river are heavily regulated. The result is a river system with significantly compromised biological functions. The anthropogenic factors contributing to the decline of salmonids are discussed. Study Area The 1,485 square mile Russian River watershed, roughly 80 miles long and 10 to 30 miles wide, lies in Mendocino, Sonoma, and Lake counties. The basin topography is characterized by a sequence of northwest/southeast trending fault-block ridges and alluvial valleys. Lying within a region of Mediterranean climate, the watershed is divided into a fog-influenced coastal region and an interior region of hot, dry summers.
  • Dear Friends, Sonoma County Is Celebrating the Winter and Spring Rains Which Have Left Our Rivers and Creeks with Plenty of Clea

    Dear Friends, Sonoma County Is Celebrating the Winter and Spring Rains Which Have Left Our Rivers and Creeks with Plenty of Clea

    This picture of Mark West creek was taken in April by our intern, Nick Bel. Dear Friends, Sonoma County is celebrating the winter and spring rains which have left our rivers and creeks with plenty of clear clean water going into summer. Many of CCWI’s water monitors have noted that local rivers and creeks have more water and are more beautiful than they have been in the past several years. This is a very promising start to the summer season, but we should not let our guard down just yet. Several years of drought have left us with a shortage of water in many reservoirs so we must still be conscious of how we use and protect this precious resource. CCWI has a new program Director! Art Hasson joined the Community Clean Water Institute in 2008 as an intern and volunteer water monitor. Art has a business degree from the State University of New York, which he has put to good use as our new program director. He has updated our water quality database engaged in field work, performed flow studies and bacterial analysis for the past two years. Art is focused on protecting our public health through the preservation of our waterways. CCWI would like to thank outgoing program director Terrance Fleming for his hard work and valuable contributions to protect water resources. We wish him the very best in his future endeavors. CCWI would like to thank our donors for their support in building our online database interactive database. It contains nine years of data that CCWI volunteer water monitors have collected on local creeks and streams in and around Sonoma County.
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000

    MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000

    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
  • 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME STREAM INVENTORY REPORT Big Austin Creek Report Revised April 14, 2006 Report Complete

    1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME STREAM INVENTORY REPORT Big Austin Creek Report Revised April 14, 2006 Report Complete

    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STREAM INVENTORY REPORT Big Austin Creek Report Revised April 14, 2006 Report Completed 2000 Assessment Completed 1995 INTRODUCTION Stream inventories were conducted during the summers of 1995 and 1996 on Big Austin Creek. The inventories were conducted in two parts: habitat inventory and biological inventory. The objective of the habitat inventory was to document the amount and condition of available habitat to fish, and other aquatic species with an emphasis on anadromous salmonids in Big Austin Creek. The objective of the biological inventory was to document the salmonid and other aquatic species present and their distribution. The objective of this report is to document the current habitat conditions, and recommend options for the potential enhancement of habitat for Chinook salmon, coho salmon and steelhead trout. Recommendations for habitat improvement activities are based upon target habitat values suitable for salmonids in California's north coast streams. WATERSHED OVERVIEW Big Austin Creek is a tributary of the Russian River, located in Sonoma County, California (see Big Austin Creek map, page 2). The legal description at the confluence with the Russian River is T7N, R11W. Its location is 38°27'58" N. latitude and 123°2'57" W. longitude. Year round vehicle access exists from Austin Creek Road via Highway 116 near Cazadero. The upper road was only accessible through private locked gates. Big Austin Creek and its tributaries drain a basin of approximately 68.7 square miles. Big Austin Creek is a fourth order stream and has approximately 13 miles of blue line stream, according to the USGS Guerneville, Duncans Mills, Fort Ross, and Cazadero 7.5 minute quadrangles.
  • CHAPTER 4.1 Hydrology

    CHAPTER 4.1 Hydrology

    CHAPTER 4.1 Hydrology 4.1.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing hydrologic conditions within the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project Area. Section 4.1.2, “Environmental Setting” describes the regional and project area environmental setting, including important water bodies and related infrastructure, surface and groundwater hydrology, geomorphology, and flooding. Section 4.1.3, “Regulatory Setting” details the federal, state, and local laws related to hydrology. Potential impacts to these resources resulting from the proposed project are analyzed in Section 4.1.4, “Impact Analysis” in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) significance criteria (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G) and mitigation measures are proposed that could reduce, eliminate, or avoid such impacts. Other impacts to related resources are addressed in other chapters as follows: impacts to water quality are addressed in Chapter 4.2, Water Quality; impacts to fish are addressed in Chapter 4.3, Fisheries Resources; and impacts to recreation are addressed in Chapter 4.5, Recreation. 4.1.2 Environmental Setting The environmental setting for hydrology includes all areas that could be affected by activities associated with the Proposed Project. As stated in Chapter 3, Background and Project Description, the objective of the Fish Flow Project is to manage Lake Mendocino and Lake Sonoma water supply releases to provide instream flows that will improve habitat for threatened and endangered fish, while updating the Water Agency’s existing water rights to reflect current conditions. The Water Agency would manage water supply releases from Lake Mendocino and Lake Sonoma to provide minimum instream flows in the Russian River and Dry Creek that would improve habitat for listed salmonids and meet the requirements of the Russian River Biological Opinion.
  • Austin Creek State Recreation Area Bullfrog Pond Campground

    Austin Creek State Recreation Area Bullfrog Pond Campground

    Austin Creek State Recreation Area Bullfrog Pond Campground 17000 Armstrong Woods Road, Guerneville, CA 95446 (707) 869-2015 or (707) 865-2391 Russian River District Office Austin Creek State Recreation Area is adjacent to Armstrong Redwoods State Natural Reserve and is accessed through the same entrance. Austin Creek offers twenty miles of trails for hiking, backcountry camping and equestrians. Campsites at Bullfrog Pond are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Tables, fire rings, flush toilets and potable water are provided, but no showers are available. PARK FEES are due and payable upon entry into GENERATORS may only be operated between the park. Use the self-registration system at the the hours of 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. campground entrance. The campsite fee covers ALCOHOL and glass containers are not allowed one vehicle. There are additional fees for extra beyond your campsite. vehicles, with a maximum of two vehicles. FIRES/FIREWOOD: Fires are only allowed in fire VEHICLES: You may park up to two vehicles at rings provided. Collecting dead or downed wood each campsite. For safety reasons, vehicles more is prohibited. Firewood is available for sale at the than 20 feet long or towing any type of trailer are entrance station. not permitted at Austin Creek SRA. Vehicles may only be parked in your assigned campsite or the BICYCLES are allowed only on paved roads or overflow parking areas. fire roads. Bicycle riders under age 18 must wear a helmet. Bicycles ridden after dark must have a OCCUPANCY: Eight people maximum are light. Please ride safely.
  • NPDES Water Bodies

    NPDES Water Bodies

    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
  • Biological Assessment

    Biological Assessment

    CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region 15000 Aviation Blvd. Hawthorne, California 90250 Submitted by: Sonoma County Department of Transportation and Public Works 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B-100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 (510) 236-6810 LSA Project No. MHN530 March 24, 2006 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT MARCH 2006 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT...........................................................1 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT AREA..........................................................................1 1.3 NOMENCLATURE..............................................................................................................6 2.0 SPECIES ADDRESSED .................................................................................................................7 2.1 LISTED SPECIES ................................................................................................................7 2.2 OTHER SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES .............................................................................10 2.3 CRITICAL HABITAT STATUS........................................................................................10
  • Catalog of Hydrologic Units in Kentucky

    Catalog of Hydrologic Units in Kentucky

    James C. Cobb, State Director and Geologist Kentucky Geological Survey UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY CATALOG OF HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN KENTUCKY Daniel I. Carey 2003 CONTENTS HYDROLOGIC UNITS.............................................................................................................................................................................4 Ohio River Basin - Region 05 (38,080 sq. mi.)..........................................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River Basin - Subregion 0507 (2,290 sq. mi.) ......................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Accounting Unit 050702 (2,290 sq. mi.)...........................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Catalog Unit 05070201 (478 sq. mi.) ..............................................................................................................5 Upper Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070202 (359 sq. mi.).........................................................................................................7 Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070203 (1,116 sq. mi.)...............................................................................................................12 Big Sandy River, Blaine Creek - Catalog Unit 05070204 (337 sq. mi.).......................................................................................18 Tygarts Creek, Little Sandy River,
  • Recovery Plan for the California Freshwater Shrimp

    Recovery Plan for the California Freshwater Shrimp

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan forthe California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pw~jflca Holmes 1895) Total Postorbital Length Carapace Length Rostrum Length CL RL First Antenna Pleopod I (PerelopodI) Second Antenna Figure 1. The California freshwater shrimp, Syncaris pac~fiCa. CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispac~fica Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Manager, Califo~~~i’evada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. wish and Wildlife Service Date: CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispa~flca Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regionai Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998.