DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of Code Politics Decolonial & Transfeminist Visions for Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms and Codes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of Code Politics Decolonial & Transfeminist Visions for Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms and Codes THE FUTURE OF CODE POLITICS DECOLONIAL & TRANSFEMINIST VISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ALGORITHMS AND CODES AUGUST 13 – 15, 2021 > INTERNATIONAL SUMMER FESTIVAL KAMPNAGEL (HAMBURG) HYBRID EVENT > LIVE AT KAMPNAGEL, P1 & ONLINE THE FUTURE OF CODE POLITICS DECOLONIAL & TRANSFEMINIST VISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ALGORITHMS AND CODES AUGUST 13 – 15, 2021 > INTERNATIONAL SUMMER FESTIVAL KAMPNAGEL (HAMBURG) HYBRID EVENT > LIVE AT KAMPNAGEL, P1 & ONLINE The debate about artificial intelligence, tech- The 3-day conference THE FUTURE OF CODE (Lucía Egaña Rojas) and Indigenous AI (Suzanne nologies, codes and algorithmic systems in POLITICS highlights new perspectives on those Kite). In their four sessions, M.A.M.I. & Coding Rights Europe usually centers around questions of efficien- technologies and their socio-political implications invite the audience to a low-tech immersive expe- cy and technical progressiveness – rarely we talk and centers on protagonists who critically deal with rience conducted by decolonial feminists from the about resilience and sustainability in this context. At these opaque structures. The invited speakers and global south: Through DIY tools, their workshops, the same time, it is not only since the pandemic that artists point out the social and planetary costs of the panels and interventions are shaped to shift per- we realize how these technologies have a massive technological infrastructures that surround us every spectives away from European-centric approaches impact on social systems, policies, societal pro- day, and work on the decolonization of technologies, towards collective actions that use creativity as a cesses and our coexistence as communities. They as well as on trans- and queerfeminist, indigenous powerful tool for shaping the future. In their two ses- create new realities and entrench old structures that or africainfuturist visions for artificial intelligence, al- sions, the Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelli- we thought had long been abolished. Technologies, gorithms and codes. gence (A.I.) Working Group proposes new concep- it is now well known, can discriminate, they have The program consists of series of lectures and key tual and practical approaches to building the next ecological costs, they are entrenched in (neo-)colo- note conversations curated in collaboration with with generation of AI systems and broaden discussions nial structures, and the monopoly of power over our the founder of the Ethical Tech Society Lorena Jau- regarding the role of technology in society beyond data lies with big tech companies. These technolo- me-Palasí and the activist and technology sociol- the largely culturally homogeneous research labs gies form infrastructures that form our lives for the ogist Fiona Krakenbürger; and of two program and Silicon Valley startup culture. future and sustainably determine the conditions of tracks curated by the globally networked initiatives our societies. Coding Rights (Joana Varon) & Musea M.A.M.I. REGISTRATION FOR ON-SITE PARTICIPATION & WORKSHOPS > 3-day ticket here (please register for all events you want to visit after purchasing the 3-day-ticket LIVESTREAMS WILL BE FREE OF CHARGE and embedded > here in time PROGRAM FRIDAY, AUGUST 13, 2021 / LIVESTREAMS > HERE 18:00 CEST / live at P1 & online Welcome & Opening 18:15 CEST / 60 min. / livestream P1 & online 19:30 CEST / 120 min. / online workshop, free of open 19:30 - 21:30 CEST / installation at Westfoyer A CONVERSATION BETWEEN DR. TIMNIT charge, separate registration >here Kampnagel GEBRU & VANESSA NAKATE INDIGENOUS AI – JASON LEWIS, CEYDA EROTICS OF EXTRACTIVISM CALL CENTER YOLGORMEZ, MICHELLE BROWN, SUZANNE BY CENEX KITE /DEVELOPING NEW APPROACHES Computer scientist and researcher in the field of / curated by M.A.M.I. & Codingrights artificial intelligence Dr. Timnit Gebru and Ugandan / curated by Indigenous AI climate justice activist Vanessa Nakate will open In an installation at the Westfoyer, a virtual call the first day of the conference with a key note Our relationship to artificially intelligent technologies center opens up, connecting one person at a conversation. Timnit Gebru was co-head of the is largely framed by popular media, news reporting, time to a telemarketing operator in Chile. In an Ethical AI Intelligence Team at Google until early or major scientists’ claims. These frames restrict intimate setting on the phone, she will provide December 2020. She had already caused a global such systems to notions of control and utility, all the future imaginaries about the consequences of your stir with her 2018 study on racist facial recognition while keeping the black-box of these technologies current consumption practices around technologies software, and most recently made headlines with a intact, and thus furthering an elite-expert hegemonia and minerals. Our service offers a voice-to-voice critical study that highlighted, among other things, that had been defining how to think of AI since the interaction with a sensitive and sexy voice of a the environmental costs of Google’s new AI – after last half of the previous century. One way to subvert teleoperator, which deploys a series of questions which she was fired in a scandal that was discussed this history is to imagine different futures with towards the personal life of the user with the goal worldwide, accompanied by widespread protests these technologies, and bringing forward different of installing conversations against extractivism. from Google’s workers. Vanessa Nakate was the questions that were (unfortunately) not germane Contextualizing, and accessing the paths of their First Fridays For Future climate activist in Uganda to the AI sciences. Questions about nonhumans goods and consumption practices in extractive and founder of the Rise up Climate Movement, which and their agency seem especially pressing in the flows. The call center is operated by CENEx (Centro aims to amplify the voices of activists from Africa. Her discourse of AI, but they cannot find a way out of de Estudios de la Naturaleza Extractiva/Extractivism work includes raising awareness to the danger of a dichotomy of human-machine in the Western Nature Study Centre). climate change, the causes and the impacts on e.g. knowledge systems. In this workshop, we will bring to local communities or gender equality. Together, they attention how to conceive of the world as consisting will discuss questions around transgenerational and of multiplicities and heterogeneous communities, by global justice in the context of artificial intelligence bringing in Indigenous Protocols for imagining the and new technologies. futures that we will be sharing. PROGRAM SATURDAY, AUGUST 14, 2021 / LIVESTREAMS > HERE 14:00 CEST / 90 min. / livestream P1 & online 16:00 CEST / 60 min. / live at P1 & online livestream 17:30 CEST / 60 min. / livestream P1 & online _ SCOTT BENESIINAABANDAN & HEMI JILLIAN C. YORK: SILICON VALUES WENDY HUI KYONG CHUN: WHAANGA: INDIGENOUS AI AND DISCRIMINATING DATA LANGUAGE The Internet once promised to be a place of / curated by Indigenous AI extraordinary freedom beyond the control of money In her book “Discriminating Data”, due out in or politics, but today corporations and platforms November 2021, Wendy Hui Kyong Chun shows The history of European algorithmization is very exercise more control over our ability to access how polarization is a goal – not an error – of Big closely interwoven with the history of colonization and information and share knowledge to a greater Data and machine learning. These methods, she racism; at its core, it could be described as a history of extent than any state. American activist and author argues, encode segregation, eugenics, and identity the essentialization of the human being. Maori linguist Jillian York presents the main propositions from her politics through their default assumptions and Dr. Hēmi Whaanga therefore asks in the Indigenous recently published book, “Silicon Values”, in which conditions. Chun, who has a background in systems AI position paper, “Is AI the new (r)evolution or she examines the impact of the current “surveillance design engineering as well as media studies and the new colonizer for Indigenous peoples?” He capitalism” (S. Zuboff) on our right to free expression cultural theory, presents the main propositions describes the power of colonization primarily as and how the policies of a few big tech companies and foundations of her research and asks: How the control and transformation of thought culture, threaten our democracies. can we release ourselves from the vice-like grip language and reality construction of the colonized. of discriminatory data? Chun calls for alternative In a conversation with Anishinaabe intermedia artist algorithms, defaults, and interdisciplinary coalitions Scott Benesiinaabandan, they will discuss their in order to desegregate networks and foster a more contributions to the Indigenous Protocols and AI democratic Big Data. Working Group – a group working on frameworks for a design and creation of AI from an ethical position that centers Indigenous concerns. PROGRAM SATURDAY, AUGUST 14, 2021 / LIVESTREAMS > HERE open 18:30 - 20:30 CEST / installation at Westfoyer Kampnagel 19:00 CEST / 90 min. / Workshop either on-site [with 3-day ticket] or online [registration] EROTICS OF EXTRACTIVISM CALL CENTER BY CENEX / curated by M.A.M.I & Coding Rights CONSULTATIONS WITH THE ORACLE FOR TRANSFEMINIST TECHNOLOGIES In an installation at the Westfoyer, a virtual call center opens
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Representation in the Climate Movement
    The Politics of Representation in the Climate Movement Article by Alast Najafi July 17, 2020 For decades, the tireless work of activists around the world has advanced the climate agenda, raising public awareness and political ambition. Yet today, one Swedish activist’s fame is next to none. Alast Najafi examines how the “Greta effect” is symptomatic of structural racial bias which determines whose voices are heard loudest. Mainstreaming an intersectional approach in the climate movement and environmental policymaking is essential to challenge the exclusion of people of colour and its damaging consequences on communities across the globe. The story of Greta Thunberg is one of superlatives and surprises. In the first year after the schoolgirl with the signature blond braids emerged on the public radar, her fame rose to stratospheric heights. Known as the “Greta effect”, her steadfast activism has galvanised millions across the globe to take part in climate demonstrations demanding that governments do their part in stopping climate change. Since she started her school strike back in August 2018, Greta Thunberg has inspired numerous and extensive tributes. She has been called an idol and the icon the planet desperately needs. The Church of Sweden even went so far as to playfully name her the successor of Jesus Christ. These days, Greta Thunberg is being invited into the corridors of power, such as the United Nations and the World Economic Forum in Davos where global leaders and chief executives of international corporations listen to her important message. Toward the end of 2019, her media exposure culminated in a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize and an extensively covered sail across the Atlantic with the aim of attending climate conferences in New York and Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Diversity in the U.S. Climate Movement
    Diversity and the Environment Webinar Series Presented by: Racial Diversity in the U.S. Climate Movement TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 2020 12:00 PM-1:00 PM ET Webinar Logistics Everyone should be connected via Audio Broadcast upon entering the webinar. You do not need to call in & you are automatically muted The presentation will be recorded and posted to the Antioch CCPCR web site within one week Please submit any questions you have for the presenter in the Q& A section If you are having trouble with any aspect of the broadcast, use the Chat section to message the Host directly Moderator Abi Abrash Walton, Ph.D. Faculty, Department of Environmental Studies Director, Master's Programs Director, Advocacy for Social Justice & Sustainability Master's Concentration, Co-Director, Center for Climate Preparedness & Community Resilience Director, Conservation Psychology Institute Antioch University New England Presenter Clara Fang Higher Education Outreach Coordinator Citizens’ Climate Lobby PhD Environmental Studies Antioch University Master of Environmental Management Yale University Racial Diversity in the U.S. Climate Movement Clara Fang Antioch University March 17, 2020 What we are going to cover Why and what How are we Building a just is diversity? doing? and inclusive climate movmeent 1 2 3 t Why diversity? Nature thrives on diversity POC Voters are Increasingly Determining Outcomes of Elections Image from: https://www.lwvcga.org/how-safe-are-georgias-elections/ A man puts his baby on top of his car as he and a woman abandon their car in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. REUTERS/Rick Wilking People of color are usually the hardest hit from the effects of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change
    Issues in Contemporary Ethics: The Questions Climate Change ] At a Glance Climate Change In September 2019, a series of international strikes and protests for climate activism saw students from over 152 countries leave their classes to march in Is the international the streets and advocate for changes to worldwide policy regarding climate change. In covering these events, the media often focused on Greta Thunberg, community fully devoted to a Swedish teenage climate activist. This brief will examine how polarizing the issue of climate change can be, especially with regards to listening to voices fighting climate change? from the Global North versus the Global South. Who is the onus of reverting climate change on? (L-R): Vanessa Nakate; Who has the bigger role to Louisa Neubauer; Greta Thunberg; Isabelle play with regards to climate Axelsson; Loukina Tille at the World Economic change, individuals, Forum in Switzerland (BBC News, 2020). governments or corporations? The Global South and Climate Case Study: Vanessa Nakate accuses media of racism Change In January 2020, at a World Economic Forum event in Davos, Switzerland, climate changes activists Vanessa Nakate, Greta Thunberg, Isabelle Axelsson, How can the disproportionate Louisa Neubauer and Loukina Tille were photographed together by the American Press (AP). In distributing the photo, the media outlet cropped effects of climate change in Vanessa Nakate out of the picture while featuring everyone else. This led to a controversy when the Ugandan-born climate justice activist criticized the AP, the Global South be reversed? and other media outlets that had also reportedly removed her from the picture. In response to Nakate’s claims, the director of photography at AP, Do countries in the Global David Ake, claimed the photo had only been cropped due to composition reasons as the photographer thought the building in the background would South have a duty to pursue distracting (BBC News, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicht Nur Greta Und Luisa: 12 Junge Klimaaktivisten, Die Jeder Kennen So
    Nicht nur Greta und Luisa: 12 junge Klimaaktivisten, die jeder kennen so... https://www.focus.de/perspektiven/aktivismus-weltweit-nicht-nur-greta-... Drucken Aktivisten aus aller Welt Nicht nur Greta und Luisa: 12 junge Menschen, die lautstark für das Klima kämpfen Samstag, 28.09.2019, 12:23 · · von FOCUS-Online-Redakteurin Hanna Klein und FOCUS-Online-Redakteurin Uschi Jonas Startseite Teilen E-Mail Kommentare Mehr FOCUS Online/dpa/Twitter/Instagram/Children vs Climate Crisis FOCUS-Online-Redakteurin Hanna Klein FOCUS-Online-Redakteurin Uschi Jonas Samstag, 28.09.2019, 12:23 Wenn es um die junge Klimabewegung geht, fokussiert sich die öffentliche Diskussion schnell auf eine Person: die 16-jährige Greta Thunberg. In Deutschland kennen viele noch Luisa Neubauer als Kopf von "Fridays for Future" - aber es gibt noch viel mehr lautstarke Mitstreiter auf der ganzen Welt. FOCUS Online zeigt, wen Sie noch kennen sollten. 1. Alexandria Villasenor (14 Jahre) - USA Alexandria Villasenor ist im Norden Kaliforniens geboren. "Als ich die Verbindung zwischen den Waldbränden und dem Klimawandel verstanden hatte, wollte ich etwas tun", sagt die 14-Jährige. Im Dezember 2018 begann sie mit dem Schulstreik – als eine der ersten in den USA. Für sie seien Schulstreiks einer der besten Wege, um Druck auf Menschen in Machtpositionen auszuüben, sagte Villasenor in einem Interview mit " Mashable ". In den USA ist "Fridays for Future" noch nicht so verbreitet wie in vielen Ländern Europas. Villasenor glaubt, dass das vor allem an der fehlenden Bildung rund um das Thema Klimawandel liegt. "Hier in den USA wird Klimawandel als Meinung deklariert." Deshalb ist eines ihrer Ziele, dass alle in ihrer Heimat verstehen, dass die Klimakrise auf Wissenschaft und Fakten basiert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Land of Many Waters Week of August 1 – August 7, 2021
    The Stone Soup Leadership Institute's Story of the Week: Benita Davis The Land of Many Waters Week of August 1 – August 7, 2021 Sunday Post 1: Thrive Global: The Land of Many Waters #SundayThoughts: This week’s story on Arianna Huffington’s Thrive Global showcases Benita Davis from Guyana, a Policy Forum Guyana volunteer, who connects students, teachers, and local communities to work together through Sandwatch, an interdisciplinary environmental program that seeks to educates people of all ages about the inextricable connection between freshwater resources and life. Thrive Global Link: https://thriveglobal.com/stories/the-land-of-many- waters/ #StoneSoupLeaderFamily #StoneSoupYoungHeroes #EnvironmentalEducation #Freshwater #HealthyRivers #ClimateAction #ClimateCrisis #ClimateDiasters #TakeAction #YouthAction Sunday Post 2: Clarion Book Review #BookReview: Special thanks to Clarion Book Reviewer, Michelle Sharpe, for your praise of the book Stone Soup for a Sustainable World: Life- Changing Stories of Young Heroes available on Kindle amzn.to/32zwGXV and Bookshop bit.ly/StoneSoup-Bookshop. Stone Soup for a Sustainable World: Life-Changing Stories of Young Heroes features the stories of 100 leaders from 38 countries around the world, and 32 U.S. cities, who work to build a more just, equitable, and sustainable world. Link: bit.ly/StoneSoup-ClarionReview #StoneSoupLeaderFamily #StoneSoupYoungHeroes #BookReview #EnvironmentalEducation #SustainableWorld #ClimateAction #YouthStories Monday Post 1: Quote: Benita Davis #MondayMotivation: As an
    [Show full text]
  • AI Principles 2020 Progress Update
    AI Principles 2020 Progress update AI Principles 2020 Progress update Table of contents Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Culture, education, and participation ....................................................................4 Technical progress ................................................................................................................... 5 Internal processes ..................................................................................................................... 8 Community outreach and exchange .....................................................................12 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................17 Appendix: Research publications and tools ....................................................18 Endnotes .........................................................................................................................................20 1 AI Principles 2020 Progress update Overview Google’s AI Principles were published in June 2018 as a charter to guide how we develop AI responsibly and the types of applications we will pursue. This report highlights recent progress in AI Principles implementation across Google, including technical tools, educational programs and governance processes. Of particular note in 2020, the AI Principles have supported our ongoing work to address
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Fairness
    Redistribution and Rekognition: A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Fairness Sarah Myers West AI Now Institute at New York University [email protected] Abstract Computer scientists, and artificial intelligence researchers in particular, have a predisposition for adopting precise, fixed definitions to serve as classifiers (Agre, 1997; Broussard, 2018). But classification is an enactment of power; it orders human interaction in ways that produce advantage and suffering (Bowker & Star, 1999). In so doing, it attempts to create order out of the messiness of human life, masking the work of the people involved in training machine learning systems, and hiding the uneven distribution of its impacts on communities (A. Taylor, 2018; Gray, 2019; Roberts, 2019). Feminist scholars, and particularly feminist scholars of color, have made powerful critiques of the ways in which artificial intelligence systems formalize, classify, and amplify historical forms of discrimination and act to reify and amplify existing forms of social inequality (Eubanks, 2017; Benjamin, 2019; Noble, 2018). In response, the machine learning community has begun to address claims of algorithmic bias under the rubric of fairness, accountability, and transparency. But it has dealt with these claims largely using computational approaches that obscure difference. Inequality is reflected and amplified in algorithmic systems in ways that exceed the capacity of statistical methods alone. This article examines how patterns of exclusion and erasure in algorithmic systems recapitulate and magnify a history of discrimination and erasure in the field of artificial intelligence, and in society more broadly. Shifting from individualized notions of fairness to more situated modeling of algorithmic remediation might create spaces of possibility for new forms of solidarity and West, Sarah Myers (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Wanda Muñoz Autonomous Weapons
    Autonomous weapons systems: an analysis from human rights, humanitarian and ethical artificial intelligence perspectives This paper is based on Wanda Muñoz’ intervention at the briefing for diplomats on “The Normative and Operational Framework on Autonomous Weapon Systems” held on 28/05/2021. Today I will share with you two angles of analysis on the issue of autonomous weapons. Firstly, I will share some perspectives of human rights activists and humanitarian workers. Secondly, I will talk about how the discussion on autonomous weapons could be informed by international discussions on ethical approaches to artificial intelligence (AI). A/ Humanitarian and Human Rights Concerns The topic of autonomous weapons should not be seen only as a military and diplomatic issue, because it is much more than that; it is also a social and humanitarian issue. Unfortunately, what we see in the world today is that thousands of civilians have to deal with the consequences of violence and weapons daily, and that humanitarian organizations are at the forefront of the response. From this perspective, I would like to highlight four key reasons why autonomous weapon should be banned. 1. Human dignity. We believe that no one ever should face any risk of harm or death by autonomous weapons, because this would go against human dignity. This has already been said but we will keep insisting on it until autonomous weapons that target humans are banned. What message do you think we would send to those populations where autonomous weapons would be deployed? In my view, we would be telling them: “To us, your value as a human being is so little, that we don’t care about the risks, and even a machine can do the job of killing you”.
    [Show full text]
  • Mx. Joy Buolamwini, Founder, Algorithmic Justice League
    United States House Committee on Science, Space and Technology June 26, 2019 Hearing on Artificial Intelligence: Societal and Ethical Implications Written Testimony of Joy Buolamwini Founder, Algorithmic Justice League Masters in Media Arts and Sciences, 2017, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MSc Education (Learning & Technology), 2014, Distinction, University of Oxford BS Computer Science, 2012, Highest Honors, Georgia Institute of Technology PhD Pending, MIT Media Lab ​ ​ Made Possible By Critical Input from Dr. Sasha Costanza-Chock Injoluwa Deborah Raji For additional information, please contact Joy Buolamwini at [email protected] ​ Dear Chairwoman Johnson, Ranking Member Lucas, and Members of the Committee, Thank you for the opportunity to testify on the societal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI). My name is Joy Buolamwini, and I am the founder of the Algorithmic Justice ​ League (AJL), based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I established AJL to create a world with ​ more ethical and inclusive technology after experiencing facial analysis software failing to detect ​ my dark-skinned face until I put on a white mask. I’ve shared this experience of algorithmic bias ​ in op-eds for Time Magazine and the New York Times as well as a TED featured talk with over 1 million views.1 My MIT thesis and subsequent research studies uncovered substantial skin type ​ and gender bias in AI services from companies like Microsoft, IBM, and Amazon.2 This research ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ has been covered in over 40 countries and has been featured in the mainstream media including FOX News, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, Bloomberg, Fortune, BBC, and even the Daily Show with Trevor Noah.3 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Davos Ends with Disagreement on Climate and Greta Thunberg on the March
    Davos ends with disagreement on climate and Greta Thunberg on the march By Julia Horowitz and Hadas Gold, CNN Business Updated 2005 GMT (0405 HKT) January 24, 2020 Davos, Switzerland (CNN Business) The annual meeting of business and political leaders in Davos wrapped up Friday with two of the world's most powerful people disagreeing over how to address the climate crisis and youth activists excoriating the international elite for not doing enough to prevent global warming. After a week of discussions at the World Economic Forum that were dominated by how to tackle the biggest problem the planet faces, the last big event of the conference produced a tense exchange between US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank. Mnuchin, who earlier this week questioned the credentials of climate activist Greta Thunberg, told panelists that long-term planning is futile when it comes to analyzing and containing climate change. Lagarde disagreed. It was crucial to assess the risk that climate change poses to financial markets and the economy, she said, so it can be "anticipated, measured" and "hopefully mitigated." Mnuchin rushed to respond. "Christine, I think you can have a lot of people look at this and model it," he said. "I just don't want to kid ourselves. I think there's no way we can possibly model what these risks are over the next 30 years with a level of certainty." The exchange highlighted the continuing divide between the United States and Europe over the climate crisis despite powerful calls for radical action from Prince Charles, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Gretathunberg: Navigating Critique and Identity Within Youth Climate Activism on Twitter
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 2020 @GretaThunberg: Navigating Critique and Identity Within Youth Climate Activism on Twitter Carina Robin Weadock Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons, Social Media Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons @GretaThunberg: Navigating Critique and Identity within Youth Climate Activism on Twitter ______________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences University of Denver ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ____________ by Carina Weadock June 2020 Advisor: Dr. Christina Foust ©Copyright by Carina Weadock 2020 All Rights Reserved Author: Carina Weadock Title: @GretaThunberg: Navigating Critique and Identity within Youth Climate Activism on Twitter Advisor: Dr. Christina Foust Degree Date: June 2020 Abstract Youth climate activist Greta Thunberg sat alone on the steps of the Swedish Parliament building in September of 2018, holding a bold black and white sign and demanding action be taken in the face of the climate crisis. Ever since, her activism and Twitter presence have sparked media attention, catalyzed youth activists globally to organize marches and strike from school, and have drawn critique. This thesis employs McKerrow’s (1989) critical rhetoric to uncover dominant discourses within tweets that undermine Thunberg based on identity and to explore the potential that Thunberg’s Twitter presence might or might not hold for future youth activist response to similar critique. I highlight implications of Thunberg’s Twitter presence on her own and other youth activist’s agency and on the collective identity of Fridays for Future, as well as pose questions that Thunberg’s Twitter presence raises for the potential of a more intersectional, networked youth climate movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Papers
    Mitigating dataset harms requires stewardship: Lessons from 1000 papers Kenny Peng, Arunesh Mathur, Arvind Narayanan Princeton University Draft: August 9, 2021 Abstract Concerns about privacy, bias, and harmful applications have shone a light on the ethics of machine learning datasets, even leading to the retraction of prominent datasets including DukeMTMC, MS-Celeb-1M, TinyImages, and VGGFace2. In response, the machine learning community has called for higher ethical standards, transparency efforts, and technical fixes in the dataset creation process. The premise of our work is that these efforts can be more effective if informed by an understanding of how datasets are used in practice in the research community. We study three influential face and person recognition datasets—DukeMTMC, MS-Celeb-1M, and Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW)—by analyzing nearly 1000 papers that cite them. We found that the creation of derivative datasets and models, broader technological and social change, the lack of clarity of licenses, and dataset management practices can introduce a wide range of ethical concerns. We conclude by suggesting a distributed approach that can mitigate these harms, making recommendations to dataset creators, conference program committees, dataset users, and the broader research community. 1 Introduction Datasets play an essential role in machine learning research, but are also the source of ethical concerns. These include concerns about the privacy of individuals included in datasets [36, 62], representational harms introduced by annotations [20, 35], effects of biases in datasets on downstream use [16, 17, 15], and the use of datasets for ethically dubious purposes [36, 67, 59]. These concerns have led to the retractions of several prominent research datasets including Tiny Images, VGGFace2, DukeMTMC, and MS-Celeb-1M.
    [Show full text]