62Nd Annual NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference April 12 – 17, 2008 Las Vegas, Nevada SUMMARY of PRESENTATIONS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

62Nd Annual NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference April 12 – 17, 2008 Las Vegas, Nevada SUMMARY of PRESENTATIONS 62ND ANNUAL NAB BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONFERENCE April 12 – 17, 2008 Las Vegas, Nevada SUMMARY OF PRESENTATIONS This booklet contains summaries of the presentations at the 62nd NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference held at the Las Vegas Convention Center, April 12–17, 2008, in association with 2008 NAB Show. The 62nd annual NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference will address the most recent developments in broadcast technology and focus on the opportunities and challenges that face broadcast engineering professionals around the world. The highly technical conference features presenters delivering papers in the various fields of broadcasting. We want to thank our conference partner, the Society of Broadcast Engineers (SBE), for its assistance in developing this year’s sessions and for creating a special SBE Ennes Workshop for 2008. We would also like to thank the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Broadcast Technology Society (BTS) for presenting its BTS Tutorial. Finally, we wish to thank the PBS and NPR engineering communities for supporting this conference. The full text of many of these presentations is contained in the NAB publication, “The 62nd Annual NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference Proceedings.” This book and accompanying CD-ROM are available at any of the NAB store locations at the convention. Co-produced by: LG Electronics/Zenith/Harris “MPH” Proposal TABLE OF CONTENTS Wayne Bretl, Zenith LG Electronics Corp John Mailhot, Harris Broadcast Communications ......................................... 15 Saturday, April 12, 2008 Samsung/Rohde & Schwarz/Nokia Proposal The Ennes Workshop presented by SBE Junehee Lee, Samsung Chairpersons: Lewis Zager, Consultant Joonsoo Lee, Samsung .............................................................................. 15 Tom Mikkelsen, MediaFLO USA ............................................. 12 Thomson/Micronas Proposal File-based Workflow 101 David Campana, Thomson Harlan Neugeboren, The Workflow and Technology Group, LLC ............... 12 Richard Citta, Linx Electronics Wen Gao, Thomson .................................................................................... 15 Opening Remarks John Poray, Society of Broadcast Engineers ................................................. 12 Wrap-up .......................................................................................15 Cross Platform: Workflow Jim O’Brian, Building4Media ...................................................................... 12 Sunday, April 13, 2008 Video Timing and Synchronization in a NAB Broadcast Engineering Web Services Environment Conference Opening Session Al Kovalick, Avid Technology ....................................................................... 12 Chairperson: Lynn Claudy, NAB ................................................................... 16 Understanding and Describing File-based Workflow We Can Work Together: Advice to DTV and Clyde Smith, Turner Broadcasting ............................................................... 12 HD Radio Engineers from the Consumer Electronics Retail Community Broadcast Exchange Format Diane Warren, HD Digital Radio Alliance Chris Lennon, Harris Broadcast Communications ......................................... 13 Robert Schwartz, Consumer Electronics Retail Coalition .............................. 16 A Brief History of the Second DTV Broadcasting for Mobile and Handheld Al Kovalick, Avid Technology ....................................................................... 13 Chairperson: Dave Converse, ABC/Disney Television Stations Group Implementing Workflow Changes Mark Richer, Advanced Television Systems Committee ............. 16 John Luff, Television Technology Consultant ................................................. 13 Panel Business Process Analysis Managing the Unmanageable: Transforming Media for MultiChannel, Multiplatform Delivery John Footen, National TeleConsultants ........................................................ 13 John Pallett, Telestream, Inc. ..................................................................... 16 Codec Performance Producing vs. Repurposing for Multiple Platforms Michael Wellings, ResearchChannel ........................................................... 13 Pete Sockett, WRAL TV .............................................................................. 17 File-Based Transmission Process Make Your Mobile TV Network a Reality John Wadle, OmniBus Systems Inc. ............................................................ 14 Jean Macher, Thomson Grass Valley ........................................................... 17 Pathfire’s Distribution of Files and the Impact on File Based Workflow Creating Content for Broadcast, Film and the Internet Joe Fabiano, Blue Sky Holdings, LLC .......................................................... 14 Michael Castro, National Geographic Television ........................................... 18 Local and Ultra Local Content in Broadcast MobileTV Saturday, April 12, 2008 Richard Lhermitte, Enensys Technologies ................................................... 18 IEEE BTS Tutorial The Role of File-based Workflows and Metadata in Chairperson: Tom Gurley, IEEE .................................................................... 15 Repurposing Content for the Web and Mobile TV Mark Bishop, Thomson .............................................................................. 19 Introduction-IEEE-BTS Tom Gurley, IEEE ........................................................................................ 15 Leveraging FEC Advances to Optimize DVB-H Networks Marshall Porter, Digital Fountain ................................................................. 19 Overview of ATSC Process Mark Aitken, Sinclair Broadcast Group ........................................................ 15 New Techniques for Mobile TV Broadcasting based on ISDB-T Masahiro Okano, NHK ............................................................................... 20 2 62nd Annual NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference Summary of Presentations 3 Preserving SFN in a Mobile TV Broadcast Brazil’s Digital Radio Technology Choices Network Using IP Distribution Acacio Luiz Costa, Mix TV Network ............................................................. 26 Nicolas Fannechere, Enensys Technologies ................................................ 20 Advances in Digital Measurement Technique Encoding for Mobile TV - Lessons Learned for FM Broadcast for Successful Deployments Tony Peterele, Audemat Inc. Boris Felts, Envivio Inc ............................................................................... 21 Frederic Allard, Audemat Inc ...................................................................... 27 Digital Opportunities for Radio Monday, April 14, 2008 Chairperson: Paul Shulins, Greater Media .................................................... 22 DTV Reception Issues Conditional Access: The Next Stage in HD Radio™ Evolution Chairperson: Al Grossniklaus, WTHR NBC 13............................................... 27 Tom Rucktenwald, NDS ............................................................................. 22 DTV Reception in an Urban Environment Managing Radio Metadata for Multiplatform William Meintel, Meintel, Sgrignoli, & Wallace, LLC ...................................... 27 Digital Distribution Daniel Mansergh, KQED Public Radio ......................................................... 22 New Neighbors: Can Wireless Microphones and Consumer Devices Coexist In the White Spaces? The Future of Radio in a Changing World Christopher Lyons, Shure Incorporated ....................................................... 27 Dave Wilson, CEA ...................................................................................... 22 Measurement Results of Consumer Indoor Antennas Seeding The Internet — Automating Podcasting Dennis Wallace, Meintel, Sgrignoli, & Wallace.............................................. 28 with Open Source Tools Frederick Gleason Jr., Paravel Systems LLC ............................................... 23 Monday, April 14, 2008 Digital Opportunities for Radio Laura Jensen, NPR Communicating with Management Melinda Driscoll, American Public Media Chairperson: Chriss Scherer, Radio magazine .............................................. 28 Nick Kereakos, American Public Media ....................................................... 23 Communicating with Management Presentation Radio Technology Advancements John Bisset, Broadcast Electronics ............................................................. 28 Chairperson: Milford Smith, Greater Media, Inc. ......................................... 23 Communicating with Management Panel Radio Broadcasters: Building File-Based Networks Don Kelley, Greater Media Cumulus Media Gary Pelkey, Wegener Gary Kline, WFYV-FM/WMXQ-FM Eric Wiler, Jones Radio Network .................................................................. 23 David Isreal, Paul Tinkle, Thunderbolt Broadcasting Company .......................................... 28 HD Audio Quality and Netcasting Greg Ogonowski, Orban/CRL, Inc. .............................................................. 24 TV News and Live Production Chairperson: Wayne Kube, Belo Corporation ................................................ 28 From ITM to ITWOM: Correcting, Completing, and Updating the Longley-Rice Irregular Terrain Model News ML-G2: Metadata for News Exchange European Broadcasting Union (EBU) ............................... 29 Sid Shumate, Givens & Bell, Inc .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • FOOTBALL 2020 SEASON  Media Release (September 21, 2020) Contact: Russell Anderson  [email protected]  214.774.1300 STANDINGS East Division W-L Pct
    FOOTBALL 2020 SEASON Media Release (September 21, 2020) Contact: Russell Anderson [email protected] 214.774.1300 STANDINGS East Division W-L Pct. H A Div. Pts. Opp. W-L Pct. H A Pts Opp. Marshall 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 2-0 1.000 2-0 0-0 76 7 FIU 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - Florida Atlantic 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - Charlotte 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-1 .000 0-0 0-1 20 35 Middle Tennessee 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-2 .000 0-1 0-1 14 89 WKU 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-2 .000 0-1 0-1 45 65 West Division W-L Pct. H A Div. Pts. Opp. W-L Pct. H A Pts Opp. Louisiana Tech 1-0 1.000 0-0 1-0 1-0 31 30 1-0 1.000 0-0 1-0 31 30 UTSA 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 2-0 1.000 1-0 1-0 75 58 UTEP 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 2-1 .667 2-0 0-1 44 86 North Texas 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 1-1 .500 1-1 0-0 92 96 UAB 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 1-1 .500 1-0 0-1 59 66 Rice 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - - 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 - - Southern Miss 0-1 .000 0-1 0-0 0-1 30 31 0-2 .000 0-2 0-0 51 63 RECENT RESULTS UPCOMING GAMES PLAYERS OF THE WEEK OFFENSE SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19 THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24 FRANK HARRIS, UTSA Louisiana Tech 31, Southern Miss 30 UAB at South Alabama (ESPN) 6:30 pm Junior, QB, Schertz, Texas Marshall 17, (23) Appalachian State 7 Harris accounted for 373 yards and three touch- UTSA 24, Stephen F.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BETS-5 Issue 1 November 1, 1996
    BETS-5 Issue 1 November 1, 1996 Spectrum Management Broadcasting Equipment Technical Standard Technical Standards and Requirements for AM Broadcasting Transmitters Aussi disponible en français - NTMR-5 Purpose This document contains the technical standards and requirements for the issuance of a Technical Acceptance Certificate (TAC) for AM broadcasting transmitters. A certificate issued for equipment classified as type approved or as technically acceptable before the coming into force of these technical standards and requirements is considered to be a valid and subsisting TAC. A Technical Acceptance Certificate is not required for equipment manufactured or imported solely for re-export, prototyping, demonstration, exhibition or testing purposes. i Table of Contents Page 1. General ...............................................................1 2. Testing and Labelling ..................................................1 3. Standard Test Conditions ..............................................2 4. Transmitting Equipment Standards .....................................3 5. Equipment Requirements ..............................................4 6. RF Carrier Performance Standards .................................... 5 6.1 Power Output Rating .................................................5 6.2 Modulation Capability ................................................5 6.3 Carrier Frequency Stability ............................................6 6.4 Carrier Level Shift ...................................................7 6.5 Spurious Emissions
    [Show full text]
  • The Broadcast Flag: It's Not Just TV
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 57 Issue 2 Article 7 3-2005 The Broadcast Flag: It's not just TV Wendy Seltzer Electronic Frontier Foundation Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Seltzer, Wendy (2005) "The Broadcast Flag: It's not just TV," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 57 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol57/iss2/7 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Broadcast Flag: It's not just TV Wendy Seltzer* I am not much of a TV person. My only set, non-HD, still picks up its channels through rabbit ears. The broadcast flag still gets me steamed, though, so much so that I recently built a high-definition digital video recorder just to beat the flag mandate. It is not about the TV. Rather, it is not about TV as broadcast to the passive consumer, to be received on single-purpose boxes. It is about TV as it could be, with innovative companies and tinkerers making TV broadcasts a core part of the converged home media network. The crippling of this kind of TV is an early warning against a pervasive technology regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • WGAW Reply Comments to the FCC on Set-Top Box Competition
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Expanding Consumers’ Video Navigation Choices ) MB Docket No. 16-42 ) Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices ) CS Docket No. 97-80 ) REPLY COMMENTS OF WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, WEST, INC. Marvin Vargas Senior Research & Policy Analyst Ellen Stutzman Senior Director, Research & Public Policy Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. 7000 West 3rd Street Los Angeles, CA 90048 (323) 951-4000 May 23, 2016 Summary It is often the case that when new technology emerges incumbent providers make alarmist predictions about guaranteed harms resulting from these innovations. While some concerns may be reasonable, the overwhelming majority of outlined harms are never realized. As CBS Chairman and CEO Les Moonves said in 2015, “All these technology initiatives that supposedly were going to hurt us have actually helped us. SVOD has helped us. DVR has helped us. The ability to go online with our own content, CBS.com, and the trailing episodes – all have helped us.”1 With the entertainment industry currently dominated by a handful of companies that have never been more profitable, it is clear that new technology and forms of content distribution have helped, not hurt the industry. While new technology can create some business uncertainty, there is strong evidence that pro-consumer developments that make legal content more accessible to viewers benefits both consumers and content creators. The Federal Communications Commission’s proposed rules for a competitive navigation device market follow this path. The current pay-TV set-top box market is controlled by incumbent distributors who charge consumers high fees and exercise their gatekeeping power to limit content competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography of On-Demand Academic Public Lectures
    Selective Bibliography of On-Demand Academic Public Lectures Version 2.0 (January 14, 2010) Compiled by George Wrenn Cataloging Librarian Humboldt State University Library [email protected] Table of Contents UPDATE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................... 10 RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................................ 11 CRITERIA FOR LISTING ............................................................................................................................ 11 SOURCES AND RESEARCH DATES ........................................................................................................... 12 AGGREGATING LECTURE SITES ............................................................................................................... 14 COMMERCIAL SITES ................................................................................................................................. 14 Busitalks beta ................................................................................................................................ 14 delicious ........................................................................................................................................ 14 FORA.tv ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Free Science Videos and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4, Current Status, Knowledge Gaps, and Research Needs Pertaining to Firefighter Radio Communication Systems
    NIOSH Firefighter Radio Communications CHAPTER IV: STRUCTURE COMMUNICATIONS ISSUES Buildings and other structures pose difficult problems for wireless (radio) communications. Whether communication is via hand-held radio or personal cellular phone, communications to, from, and within structures can degrade depending on a variety of factors. These factors include multipath effects, reflection from coated exterior glass, non-line-of-sight path loss, and signal absorption in the building construction materials, among others. The communications problems may be compounded by lack of a repeater to amplify and retransmit the signal or by poor placement of the repeater. RF propagation in structures can be so poor that there may be areas where the signal is virtually nonexistent, rendering radio communication impossible. Those who design and select firefighter communications systems cannot dictate what building materials or methods are used in structures, but they can conduct research and select the radio system designs and deployments that provide significantly improved radio communications in this extremely difficult environment.4 Communication Problems Inherent in Structures MULTIPATH Multipath fading and noise is a major cause of poor radio performance. Multipath is a phenomenon that results from the fact that a transmitted signal does not arrive at the receiver solely from a single straight line-of-sight path. Because there are obstacles in the path of a transmitted radio signal, the signal may be reflected multiple times and in multiple paths, and arrive at the receiver from various directions along various paths, with various signal strengths per path. In fact, a radio signal received by a firefighter within a building is rarely a signal that traveled directly by line of sight from the transmitter.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOTBALL 2019 SEASON  Media Release (2019 Bowl Release) Contact: Russell Anderson  [email protected]  STANDINGS East Division W-L Pct
    FOOTBALL 2019 SEASON Media Release (2019 Bowl Release) Contact: Russell Anderson [email protected] STANDINGS East Division W-L Pct. H A Div. Pts. Opp. W-L Pct. H A Pts Opp. x-Florida Atlantic 7-1 .875 3-1 4-0 5-1 291 153 10-3 .769 5-2 5-1 458 290 Marshall 6-2 .750 4-0 2-2 4-2 200 163 8-4 .667 6-1 2-3 310 277 WKU 6-2 .750 3-1 3-1 4-2 196 141 8-4 .667 4-2 4-2 307 241 Charlotte 5-3 .625 3-1 2-2 3-3 227 237 7-5 .583 5-1 2-4 379 390 Middle Tennessee 3-5 .375 3-1 0-4 3-3 229 204 4-8 .333 4-2 0-6 316 359 FIU 3-5 .375 3-1 0-4 2-4 200 237 6-6 .500 6-1 0-5 318 320 Old Dominion 0-8 .000 0-4 0-4 0-6 116 254 1-11 .083 1-5 0-6 195 358 x -C-USA Champion West Division W-L Pct. H A Div. Pts. Opp. W-L Pct. H A Pts Opp. y-UAB 6-2 .750 4-0 2-2 5-1 204 150 9-4 .682 6-0 3-4 307 271 Louisiana Tech 6-2 .750 4-0 2-2 5-1 270 197 9-3 .750 6-0 3-3 408 284 Southern Miss 5-3 .625 3-1 2-2 5-1 226 172 7-5 .583 4-1 3-4 333 311 North Texas 3-5 .375 3-1 0-4 2-4 247 241 4-8 .333 4-2 0-6 367 390 UTSA 3-5 .375 1-3 2-2 2-4 168 261 4-8 .333 2-4 2-4 244 407 Rice 3-5 .375 1-3 2-2 2-4 161 187 3-9 .250 1-6 2-3 215 311 UTEP 0-8 .000 0-4 0-4 0-6 140 278 1-11 .083 1-5 0-6 235 431 y -Division Champion BOWL SCHEDULE C-USA CHAMPIONSHIP C-USA AWARDS MAKERS WANTED BAHAMAS BOWL SATURDAY, DECEMBER 7 (Nassau, Bahamas) Ryan C-USA Championship Game COACH OF THE YEAR Friday, December 20 Florida Atlantic 49, UAB 6 Tyson Helton - WKU Buff alo vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tattler 6/16PM
    Volume XXXII • Number 24 • June 16, 2006 Conclave Learning Conference 2006: Future Tense. Marriott City Center/ Minneapolis. Rev. Al Sharpton, Gloria Steinem, Glenn Beck, & Terryl THE Brown Clemons. 14 Format Symposia. Over 40 sessions. $499 until July 1st, when the $599 walk-up rate will apply! To register for the 2006 Learning AIN TREET Conference or for questions on any Conclave program, call 952-927-4487 M S or visit www.theconclave.com. Communicator Network Clear Channel/Des Moines has launched AAA KPTL -“The Capital” - formerly occupying the frequency owned by Adult Hits KDRB. (KDRB shifted T AA TT TT LL EE R to “100.3 The Bus” a few weeks ago when KMXD flipped from AC.) The T R Bus continued broadcasting on its old frequency until the format was Publisher: Tom Kay Editor • Jess Treft launched under the guidance of CC National Triple A Format Brand Manager Cartoons Pilfered by Lenny Bronstein (and KTCZ/Minneapolis PD) Lauren Macleash. CC VP/Market Mgr. Joel McCrea said, “The incredible success of KDRB ‘The Bus’ prompted us to 1986-Main1986 Main Street’s 20th Anniversary-2006Anniversary 2006 move that station to a much stronger signal at 100.3FM. That created an opportunity to create something new for the market on the 106.3 frequency.” Syndicated talk show host Ed Schultz claims that “Republicans and He added, “People who liked KFMG, and before that KDMG, would like Conservatives” are conspiring to get him taken off Clear Channel Talk this station.”(KPTL is in the process of hiring at least three on-air WCKY-A/Cincinnati.
    [Show full text]
  • Television a La Carte: American Broadcasting Cos
    THIS VERSION DOES NOT CONTAIN PAGE NUMBERS. PLEASE CONSULT THE PRINT OR ONLINE DATABASE VERSIONS FOR THE PROPER CITATION INFORMATION. NOTE TELEVISION A LA CARTE: AMERICAN BROADCASTING COS. V. AEREO AND HOW FEDERAL COURTS’ INTERPRETATIONS OF COPYRIGHT LAW ARE IMPACTING THE FUTURE OF THE MEDIUM Andrew Fraser I. INTRODUCTION Somewhere in Brooklyn, a large warehouse holds a bundle of over one thousand rabbit-ear antennas.1 In many ways these antennas resemble the ones that rested on top of generations of older television sets before the advent of cable, except for one small fact—these rabbit-ear antennas are each roughly the size of a dime.2 It is ironic that this ancient, seemingly outdated piece of television technology might signal the medium’s newest direction, but with Aereo at the helm, this may actually be the case. Aereo is a technology platform currently available exclusively in New York City that airs live broadcast television through the Internet to a subscriber’s mobile device, computer, or web-enabled television.3 When an Aereo subscriber wishes to watch a broadcast, he or she instructs an assigned Aereo antenna to capture signals from the public airwaves and to transmit them over the Internet to the subscriber’s mobile device.4 No two subscribers ever use the same antenna at the same time, and Aereo also offers DVR recording technology, so subscribers can watch shows live or recorded.5 With this incredible merging of both old and new technology, Aereo could have an enormous impact on the way consumers watch television, assuming that it can first survive what promise to be some intense legal challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchchannel Think Forward
    ResearchChannel Think Forward. Amy Philipson Executive Director The ResearchChannel Consortium An intellectual community, we make knowledge available to all by sharing our developments, insights and discoveries with a global audience. We bring together ideas from many of the world’s premier academic and research institutions and disseminate those ideas to the public directly, without interference. We are committed to technological innovation to enable leading-edge exchanges of our resources. Think Forward. Think ResearchChannel. Consortium Members A.B. Freeman School of Business at Tulane University Universidad de Puerto Rico California State University, Sacramento Universidade de São Paulo Duke University University of Alaska - Fairbanks George Mason University University of Chicago Johns Hopkins University University of Hawaii Massachusetts Institute of Technology University of Maryland National University of Singapore University of Michigan New York University University of Pennsylvania Oregon State University University of Southern California Pennsylvania State University University of Virginia Rice University University of Washington Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey University of Wisconsin-Madison Stanford University Medical Center Virginia Tech Texas A&M University Yale University Tufts University Think Forward. Think ResearchChannel. Consortium Members AARNet National Academy of Engineering Advanced Network Forum National Academy of Sciences AJA Video Systems Inc. National Institute of Nursing CENIC National Institute of Standards and Technology Fujinon National Institutes of Health Howard Hughes Medical Institute National Library of Medicine IBM Corporation National Science Foundation Intel Corporation National Sea Grant College Program Internet2 Pacific Northwest Gigapop Johnson & Johnson Poznañ Supercomputing and Networking Center Library of Congress R1edu.org Microsoft Research SURFnet National Academies Vulcan Northwest Inc. Wisconsin Public Television Think Forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Influence Matrix Romania
    N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 MEDIA INFLUENCE MATRIX: ROMANIA Author: Dumitrita Holdis Editor: Marius Dragomir Published by CEU Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), Budapest, 2019 About CMDS About the authors The Center for Media, Data and Society Dumitrita Holdis works as a researcher for the (CMDS) is a research center for the study of Center for Media, Data and Society at CEU. media, communication, and information Previously she has been co-managing the “Sound policy and its impact on society and Relations” project, while teaching courses and practice. Founded in 2004 as the Center for conducting research on academic podcasting. Media and Communication Studies, CMDS She has done research also on media is part of Central European University’s representation, migration, and labour School of Public Policy and serves as a focal integration. She holds a BA in Sociology from point for an international network of the Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca and a acclaimed scholars, research institutions and activists. MA degree in Sociology and Social Anthropology from the Central European University. She also has professional background in project management and administration. She CMDS ADVISORY BOARD has worked and lived in Romania, Hungary, France and Turkey. Clara-Luz Álvarez Floriana Fossato Ellen Hume Monroe Price Marius Dragomir is the Director of the Center Anya Schiffrin for Media, Data and Society. He previously Stefaan G. Verhulst worked for the Open Society Foundations (OSF) for over a decade. Since 2007, he has managed the research and policy portfolio of the Program on Independent Journalism (PIJ), formerly the Network Media Program (NMP), in London.
    [Show full text]