Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Contradictory Findings and Their Possible Causes
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In re PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. : Consolidated C.A. No. 4530-VCS SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“Philadelphia PERS”), The General Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit General”), The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit P&F”), the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System (“Ann Arbor”) and Beverly Rosman (“Rosman,” and collectively with Philadelphia PERS, Detroit General, Detroit P&F and Ann Arbor, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs are holders of common stock of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (“PAS” or the “Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of PAS common stock other than the defendants and their affiliates. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and other equitable relief in connection with the proposal of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) to acquire all of the PAS’ outstanding shares that PepsiCo does not already own for a combination of cash and stock valuing PAS at $23.27 per share (the “Proposed Merger”). 2. PepsiCo simultaneously offered to acquire Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG” and with PAS, the “Companies”) at $29.50 per share, and has made consummation of a merger with either bottler contingent on consummating a merger with the other. PepsiCo’s offers are timed and structured to favor PepsiCo and promise a paltry 17.1 percent premium over the closing prices of the Companies’ stock on April 17, 2009, the last trading day prior to PepsiCo’s announcement of the Proposed Merger. -
Past Award Winners 2007
GPLA booklet 04 new 9/28/04 6:59 PM Page 37 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Department of Energy • Center for Resource Solutions 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards The 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards are hosted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States Department of Energy (DOE), and the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS). EPA and DOE recognize leading green power purchasers and green power suppliers respectively. CRS recognizes leading organizations and individuals building the market for green power. The Green Power Leadership Awards for purchasers is a recognition program of the EPA Green Power Partnership, a voluntary program working to reduce the environmental impact of electricity use by fostering development of the voluntary green power market. The Partnership provides technical assistance and public recognition to organizations that commit to using green power for a portion of their electricity needs. Partners in the program include Fortune 500 companies, states, federal agencies, universities, and leading organizations around the country that have made a commitment to green power. For the 2007 green power supplier and purchaser awards, two panels of judges reviewed nearly 100 nominations through a national competitive review process. Purchasers were evaluated based upon the size and characteristics of their green power commitment, ingenuity used to overcome barriers, internal and external communication efforts, and overall renewable energy strategy. Recognition of these companies falls into three categories: On-site Generation, Green Power Purchasing, and Green Power Partner of the Year. Suppliers were evaluated based on the following criteria: technologies utilized, total sales, evidence of annual audit to verify procurement and sales, amount of green power supplied, and number of customers served. -
Corporate Matching Gifts
Corporate Matching Gifts Your employer may match your contribution. The Corporations listed below have made charitable contributions, through their Matching Gift Programs, for educational, humanitarian and charitable endeavors in years past. Some Corporations require that you select a particular ministry to support. A K A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co. Kansas Gty Southern Industries Inc Abbott Laboratories Kemper Insurance Cos. Adams Harkness & Hill Inc. Kemper National Co. ADC Telecommunications Kennametal Inc. ADP Foundation KeyCorp Adobe Systems, Inc. Keystone Associates Inc. Aetna Inc. Kimberly Clark Foundation AG Communications Systems Kmart Corp. Aid Association for Lutherans KN Energy Inc. Aileen S. Andrew Foundation Air Products and Chemicals Inc. L Albemarle Corp. Lam Research Corp. Alco Standard Fdn Lamson & Sessions Co. Alexander & Baldwin Inc. LandAmerica Financial Group Inc. Alexander Haas Martin & Partners Leo Burnett Co. Inc. Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Levi Strauss & Co. Allegro MicroSystems W.G. Inc. LEXIS-NEXIS Allendale Mutual Insurance Co. Lexmark Internaional Inc. Alliance Capital Management, LP Thomas J. Lipton Co. Alliant Techsystems Liz Claiborne Inc. AlliedSignal Inc. Loews Corp. American Express Co. Lorillard Tobacco Co. American General Corp. Lotus Development Corp. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. Lubrizol Corp. American Inter Group Lucent Technologies American International Group Inc. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago M American Stock Exchange Maclean-Fogg Co. Ameritech Corp. Maguire Oil Co. Amgen In c. Mallinckrodt Group Inc. AmSouth BanCorp. Foundation Management Compensation AMSTED Industries Inc. Group/Dulworth Inc. Analog Devices Inc. Maritz Inc. Anchor/Russell Capital Advisors Inc. Massachusetts Mutual Life Andersons Inc. Massachusetts Financial Services Investment Aon Corp. Management Archer Daniels Midland Massachusetts Port Authority ARCO MassMutual-Blue Chip Co. -
Inleadership
IN LEADERSHIP How Minnesota’s Top 100 Public Companies Rank The 2009 Minnesota Census of Women in Corporate Leadership Report produced by St. Catherine University and the Minnesota Women’s Economic Roundtable A Statewide Wakeup Call The second annual Minnesota Census of Women in Corporate Leadership reveals that women remain an underutilized resource in the top ranks of public companies. Consider the evidence: Kudos and Contributions Twenty-seven of the top 100 public companies in This initiative has been made possible by many individuals • Minnesota have no women board members. and organizations. The report was underwritten by Spencer Stuart, St. Catherine University, and the Minnesota Women’s Forty-one of the top 100 public companies have only Economic Roundtable. • one woman on their boards. Support for both the report and the Forum was provided by Women hold only 15 percent of the Section 16b Twin Cities Business magazine and other sponsoring organiza- • (Securities and Exchange Commission) executive tions (see pages 26 to 28 of this report). Special thanks to the officer positions in Minnesota’s top 100 public volunteers who made up this year’s steering committee (see companies. the report’s final page). Without their tireless efforts, neither the report nor the Forum luncheon would have been possible. Nineteen of the top 100 public companies have no • women involved with leadership — either as directors Now, we turn to our readers — our state’s corporate and small- or executive officers. business leaders — to carry on this work, in the hope that future editions of The Minnesota Census will show progress We ask that women and men view this report as a wakeup on behalf of our state’s business climate and, subsequently, call, one whose findings deserve and demand to be shared all people in Minnesota. -
Thomas Johnson, Et Al. V. Tellabs, Inc., Et Al. 02-CV-04356
Case 1:02-cv-04356 Document 379 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 120 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MAKOR ISSUES & RIGHTS, LTD., ) CHRIS BROHOLM, RICHARD LEBRUN, ) et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) )Case No. 02 C 4356 v. ) )Honorable Judge Amy J. St. Eve TELLABS, INC., MICHAEL J. BIRCK, ) RICHARD C. NOTEBAERT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: Before the Court is Defendants Tellabs, Inc. (“Tellabs”), Michael J. Birck, Brian J. Jackman, Richard C. Notebaert, and Joan A. Ryan’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants seek summary judgment on each of the remaining claims set forth in Plaintiffs Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., Chris Broholm, and Richard Lebrun, et al. ’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”). For the following reasons, the Court grants in large part and denies in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ Motion to Strike. BACKGROUND I. Procedural History This case has a long procedural history. In June 2002, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action lawsuit on behalf of various individuals and persons who purchased common stock of Defendant Tellabs between December 11, 2000 and June 19, 2001 pursuant to § 10(b) of the Case 1:02-cv-04356 Document 379 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 120 Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 10(b)”) and SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (“Rule 10b-5”). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 15 U.S.C. -
BMW of North America, LLC NJ ""K"" Line America, Inc. VA 1199
The plan sponsors listed below have at least one application for the Retiree Drug Subsidy (RDS) program in an "Approved" status for a plan year ending in 2010 as of February 4, 2011. The state listed for each sponsor is the state provided by the sponsor on the application for the subsidy. This state may, or may not, be where the majority of the plan sponsor's retirees reside or where the plan sponsor is headquartered. This list will be updated periodically. Plan Plan Sponsor Business Name Sponsor State : BMW of North America, LLC NJ ""K"" Line America, Inc. VA 1199 SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund NY 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund NY 3M Company MN 4th District IBEW Health Fund WV A-C RETIREES' VOLUNTARY BENFITS PLAN WI A. DUDA & SONS, INC. FL A. SCHULMAN, INC OH A. T. Massey Coal Company, Inc. VA A&E Television Networks NY AAA EAST PENN PA AARP DC ABB Inc. CT Abbott Laboratories IL Abbott Pharmaceuticals PR Ltd. PR Acadia Parish School Board LA Accenture LLP IL Accuride Corporation IN ACF Industries LLC MO ACGME IL Acton Health Insurance Trust MA Actuant Corporation WI Adirondack Central School NY Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts PA Adventist Risk Management MD Advisory Services OH AEGON USA, Inc. IA AFL-CIO Health and Welfare Trust DC AFSCME DC AFSCME Council 31 IL afscme d.c. 47 health & welfare fund PA AFSCME District Council 33 Health and Welfare Plan PA AFTRA Health Fund NY AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA INC TN Page 1 AGC-IUOE Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund WA AGCO Corporation GA Agilent Technologies, Inc. -
3M Company (MMM)
COMPANY PROFILES 2008 The Research Group of Godsey & Gibb Associates compiled the following information in Godsey & Gibb Associates’ 2008 Company Profiles from Reuters’ Company Profiles. These reports are intended solely for the clients of Godsey & Gibb Associates and its affiliates. This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a recommendation for the purchase or sale of any individual security. GODSEY & GIBB COMPANY PROFILES 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS AFLAC Inc. (AFL)………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 AGL Resources Inc. (ATG)…………………………………………………………………………… 3 American Electric Power Co. Inc. (AEP)….………………………………………………………… 5 AT&T, Inc (T)…………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX)……………………….……………………………………………………. 9 BB&T Corp. (BBT)………………………………………………………………..…………………… 10 BP, plc (BP)…………………………………………………………………………………….………. 12 Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)……………………………………………………………….………… 13 Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH)……………………………………………………….….. 15 CVS Caremark Corp. (CVS)………………………………………………………………………….. 16 Dominion Resources, Inc. (D)………………………………………………….…………………….. 17 Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)………………………………………………………………………….. 19 Express Scripts, Inc. (ESRX)…………………………………………………………………..……… 23 ExxonMobil Corp. (XOM)………………………………………………………………….…………… 24 General Electric Company (GE)………………………………………………………………..……. 26 Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)…………………………………………………………………………. 27 W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ)………………………………………………………………………….. 32 Integrys Energy Group, -
Ctpf Illinois Economic Opportunity Report
CTPF ILLINOIS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY REPORT As Required by Public Act 096-0753 for the period ending June 30, 2021 202 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE I 1 Illinois-based Investment Manager Firms Investing on Behalf of CTPF TABLE II Illinois-based Private Equity Partnerships, Portfolio Companies, 2 Infrastructure, and Real Estate Properties in the CTPF Portfolio TABLE III 14 Illinois-based Public Equity Market Value of Shares Held in CTPF’s Portfolio TABLE IV 18 Illinois-based Fixed Income Market Value of Shares Held in CTPF’s Portfolio TABLE V Domestic Equity Brokerage Commissions Paid to Illinois-based 19 Brokers/Dealers TABLE VI 20 International Equity Brokerage Commissions Paid to Illinois-based Brokers/Dealers TABLE VII Fixed Income Volume Traded through Illinois-based Brokers/Dealers 21 (par value) 2021 CTPF ILLINOIS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC ACT 096-0753 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2021 TABLE I Illinois-based Investment Manager Firms Investing on Behalf of CTPF Table I identifies the economic opportunity investments made by CTPF with Illinois-based investment management companies. As of June 30, 2021, Total Market/Fair Value of Illinois-based investment managers was $3,121,157,662.18 (23.74%) of the total CTPF investment portfolio of $13,145,258,889.14. Market/Fair Value % of Total Fund Investment Manager Firms Location As of 6/30/2021 (reported in millions) Adams Street Chicago $ 319.69 2.43% Ariel Capital Management Chicago 83.44 0.63% Attucks Asset Management Chicago 274.06 2.08% Ativo Capital Management1 Chicago -
2013 Annual Report
2013 Annual Report Letter to Shareholders 1 Financial Highlights 10 PepsiCo Board of Directors 11 PepsiCo Leadership 12 PepsiCo Form 10-K 13 Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Information 141 Common Stock and Shareholder Information 144 “We delivered on, or exceeded, each and every one of the fi nancial goals we announced to shareholders at the beginning of the year.” INDRA K. NOOYI Dear Fellow Shareholders, PepsiCo Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer Last year I described the dual goals we have unwaveringly pursued since we began our transformation back in 2007: continue to deliver the strong, consistent financial results our shareholders expect year after year, while at the same time investing in and transforming the company to ensure it is built for long-term, sustainable growth. In short, perform while we transform. Looking back, 2012 was an important year in PepsiCo’s transformation journey. We took the necessary actions to strengthen our company. We made significant invest- ments behind our largest global brands. And we changed our operating model — moving from a loose federation of countries and regions to a more efficient and effective model that leverages PepsiCo’s talent, capabilities and resources globally. In 2013, we continued to reinforce these actions and began to realize the benefits. Despite a very challenging operating environment that included economic instability and uncertainty in many of our key markets around the world, we delivered on, or exceeded, each and every one of the financial goals we announced to shareholders at the 1 beginning of the year. Our performance in 2013 was strong: • Our organic revenue grew 4%. -
A Tribute to Our Teachers 2018 Annual Report
PROVIDENCE ST. MEL SCHOOL A Tribute to our Teachers 2018 ANNUAL REPORT We are grateful to those who are the heartbeat of our school and our success —the teachers! A Tribute to our Teachers 2018 Annual Report The educators of Providence St. Mel School walk alongside our students everyday, inspiring them to live up to their potential and build upon our legacy of integrity and academic excellence. A Tribute to Our Teachers 2 | A Tribute to Our Teachers Since 1978, the march toward a quality education and a A Providence St. Mel education has profound impact on the better, brighter, and richer future for all has been the lives of our students and exemplifies for future generations that, foundation of the mission and vision of Providence St. Mel no matter the adversities they face along the way, they too can School. Our tradition of success on Chicago’s West Side has succeed. Unlike other schools in our West Side community, our been unrivaled, not only locally but nationally. Let us not perfect college acceptance rate is accompanied by a drastic forget who has been at the forefront of our success – our improvement in standardized test performance. The average incredible and tremendous faculty and staff. Our teachers student that enters Providence St. Mel School as a freshman touch the lives of our students daily, and we know their will increase their ACT score by 7-8 points from 9th grade to impact can influence the trajectory of a student’s life, 11th grade. The Class of 2018 boasts an average ACT score of empowering them to realize that they are capable and 25! As a result of this hard work, universities throughout the committed individuals. -
Social Responsible Organizations
COMPANY NAME INDUSTRY Cooper Tire and Rubber Company Automotive Midas, Inc Automotive Carmax, Inc Automotive Coca-Cola Company Beverages PepsiCo, Inc. Beverages 3Com Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Adobe Systems, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Dun & Bradstreet Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Earthlink, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies eFunds Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Electronic Arts, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Electronic Data Systems Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Fiserv, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Home Depot, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Intuit, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Iron Mountain, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Lamar Advertising Co Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Microsoft Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Monster Worldwide, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies NCR Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Novell, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Omnicom Group, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Pixar Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Red Hat, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Sapient Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Sun Microsystems, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Symantec Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Unisys Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies VeriSign, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Veritas Software Corp Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Yahoo!, Inc Building Material, Products and Garden Supplies Gillette/Proctor and Gamble Co Chemical, Pharmaceuticals and Allied Products Johnson & Johnson Chemical, Pharmaceuticals and Allied Products Merck & Co., Inc. -
General Mills
HOWARD PENNEY ([email protected]) SHAYNE LAIDLAW ([email protected]) IN THE ACTIVIST’S CROSSHAIRS LONG: BUFFALO WILD WINGS (BWLD), A WIN-WIN SCENARIO October 25, 2016 © Hedgeye Risk Management LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER Hedgeye Risk Management is a registered investment advisor, registered with the State of Connecticut. Hedgeye Risk Management is not a broker dealer and does not provide investment advice for individuals. This research does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. This research is presented without regard to individual investment preferences or risk parameters; it is general information and does not constitute specific investment advice. This presentation is based on information from sources believed to be reliable. Hedgeye Risk Management is not responsible for errors, inaccuracies or omissions of information. The opinions and conclusions contained in this report are those of Hedgeye Risk Management, and are intended solely for the use of Hedgeye Risk Management’s clients and subscribers. In reaching these opinions and conclusions, Hedgeye Risk Management and its employees have relied upon research conducted by Hedgeye Risk Management’s employees, which is based upon sources considered credible and reliable within the industry. Hedgeye Risk Management is not responsible for the validity or authenticity of the information upon which it has relied. TERMS OF USE This report is intended solely for the use of its recipient. Re-distribution or republication of this report and its contents are prohibited. For more details please refer to the appropriate sections of the Hedgeye Services Agreement and the Terms of Use at www.hedgeye.com © Hedgeye Risk Management LLC.