DOCSLIB.ORG

Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 Forest Inventory and Analysis Program U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service DRAFT Revision 2 2 DRAFT FIA Database Description and Users Manual for Phase 2, version 4.0, revision 2 Foreword December, 2009 Foreword Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) is a continuing endeavor mandated by Congress in the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 and the McSweeney- McNary Forest Research Act of 1928. FIA's primary objective is to determine the extent, condition, volume, growth, and depletions of timber on the Nation's forest land. Before 1999, all inventories were conducted on a periodic basis. With the passage of the 1998 Farm Bill, FIA is required to collect data on plots annually within each State. This kind of up-to- date information is essential to frame realistic forest policies and programs. USDA Forest Service regional research stations are responsible for conducting these inventories and publishing summary reports for individual States. In addition to published reports, the Forest Service provides data collected in each inventory to those interested in further analysis. This report describes a standard format in which data can be obtained. This standard format, referred to as the Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (FIADB) structure, was developed to provide users with as much data as possible in a consistent manner among States. A number of inventories conducted prior to the implementation of annual inventory are available in FIADB. However, various data attributes may be empty or the items may have been collected or computed differently. Annual inventories use a common plot design and common data collection procedures nationwide, resulting in greater consistency among FIA units than earlier inventories. Data field definitions note inconsistencies caused by different sampling designs and processing methods. 3 DRAFT FIA Database Description and Users Manual for Phase 2, version 4.0, revision 2 Table of Contents December, 2009 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1 -- Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of this Manual ........................................................................................................................ 6 The FIA Program ................................................................................................................................. 7 The FIA Database ............................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 -- FIA Sampling and Estimation Procedures ........................................................................10 Sampling and Stratification Methodology .......................................................................................... 10 Plot Location ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Plot Design, Condition Delineation, and Types of Data Attributes ....................................................12 Types of Attributes ............................................................................................................................. 13 Expansion factors .............................................................................................................................. 15 Accuracy Standards .......................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3 -- Database Structure ........................................................................................................... 18 Table Descriptions ............................................................................................................................. 18 Keys Presented with the Tables ........................................................................................................ 24 Survey Table (Oracle table name is SURVEY) .................................................................................27 County Table (Oracle table name is COUNTY) ................................................................................ 31 Plot Table (Oracle table name is PLOT) ........................................................................................... 33 Condition Table (Oracle table name is COND) ................................................................................. 47 Subplot Table (Oracle table name is SUBPLOT) ..............................................................................82 Subplot Condition Table (Oracle table name is SUBP_COND) ........................................................89 Tree Table (Oracle table name is TREE) .......................................................................................... 94 Seedling Table (Oracle table name is SEEDLING) ........................................................................ 135 Site Tree Table (Oracle table name is SITETREE)......................................................................... 141 Boundary Table (Oracle table name is BOUNDARY) ..................................................................... 148 Subplot Condition Change Matrix (Oracle table name is SUBP_COND_CHNG_MTRX) .............. 153 Tree Regional Biomass Table (Oracle table name is TREE_REGIONAL_BIOMASS) .................. 157 Population Estimation Unit Table (Oracle table name is POP_ESTN_UNIT) ................................. 160 Population Evaluation Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL) ................................................... 163 Population Evaluation Attribute Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL_ATTRIBUTE ............... 166 Population Evaluation Group Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL_GRP) .............................. 168 Population Evaluation Type Table (Oracle table name is POP_EVAL_TYP) .................................173 Population Plot Stratum Assignment Table (Oracle table name is POP_PLOT_STRATUM_ASSGN) .................................................................................................. 176 Population Stratum Table (Oracle table name is POP_STRATUM) ............................................... 180 Reference Population Attribute Table (Oracle table name is REF_POP_ATTRIBUTE) ................ 184 Reference Population Evaluation Type Description Table (Oracle table name is REF_POP_EVAL_TYP_DESCR) .................................................................................................... 186 Reference Forest Type Table (Oracle table name is REF_FOREST_TYPE) ................................ 189 Reference Species Table (Oracle table name is REF_SPECIES) ................................................. 192 Reference Species Group Table (Oracle table name is REF_SPECIES_GROUP) .......................209 Reference Habitat Type Description Table (Oracle table name is REF_HABTYP_DESCRIPTION)211 Reference Habitat Type Publication Table (Oracle table name is REF_HABTYP_PUBLICATION)213 Reference Citation Table (Oracle table name is REF_CITATION) ................................................. 215 Reference Forest Inventory and Analysis Database Version Table (Oracle table name is REF_FIADB_VERSION) ................................................................................................................. 217 Reference State Elevation Table (Oracle table name is REF_STATE_ELEV) ............................... 219 Reference Unit Table (Oracle table name is REF_UNIT) ............................................................... 221 Chapter 4 – Calculating Population Estimates and Their Associated Sampling Errors ..................... 223 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 267 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................................... 268 Appendix A. Index of Column Names ................................................................................................. 271 Appendix B. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Design Codes and Definitions by Region ............. 290 Appendix C. State, Survey Unit, and County Codes .......................................................................... 297 4 DRAFT FIA Database Description and Users Manual for Phase 2, version 4.0, revision 2 Table of Contents December, 2009 Appendix D. Forest Type Codes and Names ..................................................................................... 339 Appendix E. Administrative National Forest Codes and Names ........................................................ 342 Appendix F. Tree Species Codes, Names, and Occurrences............................................................ 344 Appendix G. Tree Species Group Codes ........................................................................................... 354 Appendix H. Damage Agent codes for PNW ...................................................................................... 355 Appendix I. FIA Inventories by State, Year, and Type ........................................................................3 60 Appendix J. Biomass Estimation in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1
    United States Department of Agriculture Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1 Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-375 April 2018 Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Ho, Joanne J.; Little, Natalie, J.; Joyce, Linda A., eds. 2018. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Intermountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-375. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Part 1. pp. 1–197. Abstract The Intermountain Adaptation Partnership (IAP) identified climate change issues relevant to resource management on Federal lands in Nevada, Utah, southern Idaho, eastern California, and western Wyoming, and developed solutions intended to minimize negative effects of climate change and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems to a warmer climate. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service scientists, Federal resource managers, and stakeholders collaborated over a 2-year period to conduct a state-of-science climate change vulnerability assessment and develop adaptation options for Federal lands. The vulnerability assessment emphasized key resource areas— water, fisheries, vegetation and disturbance, wildlife, recreation, infrastructure, cultural heritage, and ecosystem services—regarded as the most important for ecosystems and human communities. The earliest and most profound effects of climate change are expected for water resources, the result of declining snowpacks causing higher peak winter
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Big Tree Registry a List of the Largest Trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas a & M Forest Service
    Texas Big Tree Registry A list of the largest trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas A & M Forest Service Native and Naturalized Species of Texas: 320 ( D indicates species naturalized to Texas) Common Name (also known as) Latin Name Remarks Cir. Threshold acacia, Berlandier (guajillo) Senegalia berlandieri Considered a shrub by B. Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, blackbrush Vachellia rigidula Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' acacia, Gregg (catclaw acacia, Gregg catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. greggii Was named A. greggii 55'' or 4.6 ' acacia, Roemer (roundflower catclaw) Senegalia roemeriana 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, sweet (huisache) Vachellia farnesiana 100'' or 8.3 ' acacia, twisted (huisachillo) Vachellia bravoensis Was named 'A. tortuosa' 9'' or 0.8 ' acacia, Wright (Wright catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. wrightii Was named 'A. wrightii' 70'' or 5.8 ' D ailanthus (tree-of-heaven) Ailanthus altissima 120'' or 10.0 ' alder, hazel Alnus serrulata 18'' or 1.5 ' allthorn (crown-of-thorns) Koeberlinia spinosa Considered a shrub by Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' anacahuita (anacahuite, Mexican olive) Cordia boissieri 60'' or 5.0 ' anacua (anaqua, knockaway) Ehretia anacua 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Carolina Fraxinus caroliniana 90'' or 7.5 ' ash, Chihuahuan Fraxinus papillosa 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, fragrant Fraxinus cuspidata 18'' or 1.5 ' ash, green Fraxinus pennsylvanica 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Gregg (littleleaf ash) Fraxinus greggii 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, Mexican (Berlandier ash) Fraxinus berlandieriana Was named 'F. berlandierana' 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Texas Fraxinus texensis 60'' or 5.0 ' ash, velvet (Arizona ash) Fraxinus velutina 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, white Fraxinus americana 100'' or 8.3 ' aspen, quaking Populus tremuloides 25'' or 2.1 ' baccharis, eastern (groundseltree) Baccharis halimifolia Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' baldcypress (bald cypress) Taxodium distichum Was named 'T.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbances Influence Trait Evolution in Pinus
    Master's Thesis Diversify or specialize: Disturbances influence trait evolution in Pinus Supervision by: Prof. Dr. Elena Conti & Dr. Niklaus E. Zimmermann University of Zurich, Institute of Systematic Botany & Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Landscape Dynamics Bianca Saladin October 2013 Front page: Forest of Pinus taeda, northern Florida, 1/2013 Table of content 1 STRONG PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN PINE TRAITS 5 1.1 ABSTRACT 5 1.2 INTRODUCTION 5 1.3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 8 1.3.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 8 1.3.2 TRAIT DATA 9 1.3.3 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 9 1.4 RESULTS 11 1.4.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 11 1.4.2 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 12 1.5 DISCUSSION 14 1.5.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 14 1.5.2 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 16 1.6 CONCLUSION 17 1.7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 1.8 REFERENCES 19 2 THE ROLE OF FIRE IN TRIGGERING DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN PINE SPECIES 21 2.1 ABSTRACT 21 2.2 INTRODUCTION 21 2.3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 24 2.3.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 24 2.3.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE 24 2.4 RESULTS 25 2.4.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 25 2.4.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE 25 2.5 DISCUSSION 29 2.5.1 DIVERSIFICATION RATE IN RESPONSE TO FIRE ADAPTATIONS 29 2.5.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE IN RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE, STRESS AND PLEIOTROPIC COSTS 30 2.5.3 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE ANALYSIS PATHWAY 33 2.5.4 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 34 2.6 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK 34 2.7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 35 2.8 REFERENCES 36 3 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 39 3.1 S1 - ACCESSION NUMBERS OF GENE SEQUENCES 40 3.2 S2 - TRAIT DATABASE 44 3.3 S3 - SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MAPS 58 3.4 S4 - DISTRIBUTION OF TRAITS OVER PHYLOGENY 81 3.5 S5 - PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL OF 19 BIOCLIM VARIABLES 84 3.6 S6 – COMPLETE LIST OF REFERENCES 85 2 Introduction to the Master's thesis The aim of my master's thesis was to assess trait and niche evolution in pines within a phylogenetic comparative framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlands Author: Kerry Dooley Historically the Primary Interest Area for National Inventories Was Timber
    Woodlands Author: Kerry Dooley Historically the primary interest area for national inventories was timber. Consequently, the national inventory framework and collection protocols were focused on productive timber- lands (USDA Forest Service 2005). Over time, information such as estimations of carbon sequestration, wildfire fuel loads, and nontimber forest products and services (e.g., biofuels and wildlife habitat) has become topics of increasing interest. The FIA program—the national inventory used in the United States—broadened the focus of its surveys to include non- timberland forests, including woodlands, better aligning with these changing focus areas. Woodlands generally occur in less productive growing condi- tions, such as the arid Southwestern United States. Woodlands provide much, if not all, of the same services provided by forests; that is, they function as important wildlife habitat, improve water quality, serve as carbon sinks (or sources, in the event of wildfires), and provide fuel during wildfire season. The species that comprise woodlands differ in characteristics from most trees. On average, woodland species tend to be slower growing, smaller in stature, and of a form with more forks and branches near the base of the tree. Woodland species often grow as clumps of stems rather than one central stem. Beyond the characteristics of the trees classified as woodland species, specific parameters pertain to classification of the land use category of woodlands, while the Resources Planning Act (RPA) derives calculations of woodland for this report from the FIA data, the FIA and RPA definitions of woodland differ somewhat, as outlined in the following paragraphs. Forest Inventory and Analysis Definitions and Parameters FIA defines woodlands strictly along the lines of species com- position and associated forest types, and considers woodlands a subset of forest lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Landa Park Tree Management Plan
    PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Landa Park Tree Maintenance Plan CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Mission statement Our mission is to afford diverse opportunities and access for all residents and visitors through innovative programs and facilities, open space preservation and economic enhancement. Vision Statement Our Vision statement is to enhance the well being of our community through laughter, play, conservation and discovery. TABLE OF CONTENTS LANDA PARK TREE MAINTENANCE PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..………………………..……………..………………………… Page 1 HISTORY ……………………………………………………………………………….…... Page 1 BENEFITS OF TREES………………………………….………………………................Page 2 2015 MANAGEMENT GOALS……………………………………………………………. Page 3 SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LANDA PARK……... Page 5 LANDA PARK TREE INVENTORY ………………………………………..…………….. Page 8 LANDA PARK FORESTRY STRATEGIES…………………………………………..…. Page 11 Management Zones………………………………………………............................ Page 11 Maintenance Guidelines ………………………………………............................... Page 11 Tree Specific Issues…………………………………………………........................ Page 15 Tree Protection……………………………………………………….….................... Page 16 Tree Planting Plan…………………………………………….………...................... Page 17 Species Diversity and Selection…………………………………............................ Page 17 Stem Density………………………………………………………............................ Page 19 Planting in Specific Locations…………………………………….………………….. Page 21 Outreach……………………………………………………………........................... Page 21 Education………………………………………………………………......................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages (US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design)
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design Paul Beier, Daniel Majka submitted July 2006 last revised March 14, 2007 US-93: WICKENBURG TO SANTA MARIA RIVER LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, and Shaula Hedwall helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., and D. Majka. 2006. Arizona Missing Linkages: US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES...............................................................................................................................II
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Sequencing and Taxonomy of Unusual Serrate Juniperus from Mexico: Chloroplast Capture and Incomplete Lineage Sorting in J. Coahuilensis and Allied Taxa
    University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Health and Biomedical Sciences Faculty Publications and Presentations College of Health Professions 1-19-2017 DNA sequencing and taxonomy of unusual serrate Juniperus from Mexico: Chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting in J. coahuilensis and allied taxa Robert P. Adams Baylor University M. Socorro Gonzalez-Elizondo Martha Gonzalez-Elizondo David Ramirez Noya Andrea E. Schwarzbach The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/hbs_fac Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Adams, R. P., Gonzalez-Elizondo, M. S., Gonzalez-Elizondo, M., Ramirez Noya, D., & Schwarzbach, A. E. (2017). DNA sequencing and taxonomy of unusual serrate Juniperus from Mexico: Chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting in J. coahuilensis and allied taxa. Phytologia, 99(1), 62–73. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Health Professions at ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. It has been accepted for inclusion in Health and Biomedical Sciences Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 62 Phytologia (Jan 19, 2017) 99(1) DNA sequencing and taxonomy of unusual serrate Juniperus from Mexico: Chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting in J. coahuilensis and allied taxa Robert P. Adams Biology Department, Baylor University, Box 97388, Waco, TX 76798, USA, [email protected] M. Socorro Gonzalez-Elizondo, Martha Gonzalez-Elizondo, David Ramirez Noya CIIDIR Unidad Durango, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Sigma 119, Durango, Dgo., 34234 Mexico and Andrea E. Schwarzbach Department of Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp
    Article Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus spp. Forests (Cupressaceae) with Bark Beetles of Phloeosinus spp. (Scolytinae) from the Northeast of Mexico Hernández-García Juan Alfredo 1,2,3 , Cuellar-Rodríguez Gerardo 1 , Aguirre-Ojeda Nallely Guadalupe 1, Villa-Tanaca Lourdes 2 , Hernández-Rodríguez César 2 and Armendáriz-Toledano Francisco 3,* 1 Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km. 145, Linares, Nuevo León C.P. 67700, Mexico; [email protected] (H.-G.J.A.); [email protected] (C.-R.G.); [email protected] (A.-O.N.G.) 2 Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, Mexico; [email protected] (V.-T.L.); [email protected] (H.-R.C.) 3 Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cto. Zona Deportiva S/N, Ciudad Universitaria. CDMX, Mexico C.P. 04510, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-56-22-92-50 (ext. 47833) Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: Geosmithia members are mitosporic filamentous fungi commonly recorded and isolated from bark beetles of the Scolytinae subfamily and their respective host’s species. This genus includes 18 species formally described and 38 phylogenetic species recorded in several localities from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North and South America, where they exhibit frequent associations with phloeophagous and wood-boring bark beetles. Among phloephagous bark beetle species, specifically, in members of the genus Phloeosinus Chapuis, almost 10% of Geosmithia strains have been isolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages: Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design Paul Beier, Emily Garding, Daniel Majka 2008 PATAGONIA – SANTA RITA LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, Michael Robinson, Mitch Sternberg, Dr. Robert Harrison, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, Shaula Hedwall, Bill Broyles, Dale Turner, Natasha Kline, Thomas Skinner, David Brown, Jeff Servoss, Janice Pryzbyl, Tim Snow, Lisa Haynes, Don Swann, Trevor Hare, and Martin Lawrence helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark, and Elissa Ostergaard provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., E. Garding, and D. Majka. 2008. Arizona Missing Linkages: Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prescott Area Plant List Bulletin #32A
    Prescott Area Plant List Bulletin #32A Landscape Trees 9/6/05 Drought Height Width Scientific Name Common Name Comments Tolerance (feet) (feet) Abies concolor White Fir somewhat 60 30 Short lived, some unknown disease problems encountered Acer negundo Box Elder none 50 50 Nice deciduous tree, female trees attract box elder bugs Acer palmatum Japanese Maple none 20 20 Many named varieties with unusual characteristics Acer plantanoides Norway Maple none 50 50 Subject to aphids, may not perform well in wind and alkaline soils Acer rubrum Red Maple none 40 40 Reddish twigs, red fall color Acer saccharinum Silver Maple none 60 60 Large tree, have seen trunk damage that may have been caused by spring freeze Acer saccharum Sugar Maple none 50 50 Source of maple sugar Ailanthus altissima Tree of Heaven very 40 20 Invasive Species – DO NOT PLANT Albizia julibrissin Mimosa somewhat 30 40 Fluffy pink flowers, flat topped Betula nigra River Birch none 40 25 Darker flaky bark, attractive foliage White bark, attractive foliage, good alternative to aspen because of fewer Betula pendula European White Birch none 30 20 diseases Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar somewhat 60 30 Rich green foliage in flat sprays, wood smells like pencils Catalpa speciosa Western Catalpa somewhat 40 40 Large heart-shaped leaves, attractive flowers and bark Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar somewhat 50 30 Shorter needles than Deodar Cedar, more erect leader Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar somewhat 60 40 Droopy leader, softer texture than Atlas Cedar Celtis occidentalis Hackberry somewhat
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S2 Details of 455 Conifer Species Used in the Phylogene�C and Physiological Niche Modelling to Es�Mate Drivers of Diversifica�On
    Supplementary Table S2 Details of 455 conifer species used in the phylogene�c and physiological niche modelling to es�mate drivers of diversifica�on. Shown are: the clade calcifica�on (10 and 42 clade); number of cleaned georeferenced presence records; the confusion matrix which describes the model fit in terms of true posi�ves, true nega�ves, false posi�ves and false nega�ves; and the es�mated niche area in quarter degree grid squares for the globe (projected) and for version of the globe where all environmental zones are equally common (resampled), see main text for further details. Clade classifica�on Confusion matrix niche area (# grid cells) 42 (68*) Number of True True False False Species 10 clades clades records posi�ves nega�ves posi�ves nega�ves Projected Resampled Abies alba 10 65 119 117 111 4 2 6658 7622 Abies amabilis 10 65 80 79 74 2 0 11783 13701 Abies bracteata 10 65 4 4 15 0 0 1610 1846 Abies concolor 10 65 98 90 86 8 8 13825 15410 Abies fabri 10 65 4 4 17 0 0 2559 2641 Abies fargesii 10 65 13 13 18 0 0 14450 15305 Abies firma 10 65 163 161 163 1 0 2270 2436 Abies fraseri 10 65 15 15 16 0 0 1914 2075 Abies grandis 10 65 77 75 70 2 2 11654 13629 Abies holophylla 10 65 12 12 16 1 0 23899 24592 Abies homolepis 10 65 31 31 34 0 0 791 851 Abies kawakamii 10 65 17 17 26 0 0 700 1164 Abies koreana 10 65 10 10 18 0 0 985 1048 Abies lasiocarpa 10 65 105 100 95 6 5 11422 12454 Abies magnifica 10 65 47 47 58 2 0 11882 14353 Abies mariesii 10 65 16 16 17 0 0 3833 4114 Abies nebrodensis 10 65 1 1 17 0 0 1094 973 Abies nephrolepis 10 65
    [Show full text]
  • RECOMMENDED NATIVE PLANTS for LANDSCAPING in the TEXAS HILL COUNTRY Prepared by the Kerrville Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Texas
    Native Plant Society of Texas RECOMMENDED Evergreen Yaupon* Ilex vomitoria A 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that promotes NATIVE PLANTS research, conservation and Prairie Verbena* utilization of native plants Verbena bipinnatifida and plant habitats of Texas FOR LANDSCAPING through education, out- reach and example. IN THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY Prepared by Kerrville Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Texas Bald Cypress ** Taxodium distichum http://www.npsot.org/Kerrville/ Texas Madrone * Arbutus xalapensis Bur Oak ** Honey Locust ** Quercus macrocarpa Gleditsia triacanthos Buttonbush *** Cephalanthus occidentalis Evergreen Sumac * Rhus Virens * Sketches by Margaret Campbell. Courtesy of the University of Texas Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin. For more information, please visit our website: ** Sketches by Britton, N.L., and A. Brown. 1913. http://www.npsot.org/Kerrville/ Courtesy of Kentucky Native Plant Society. Rev. March 2011 *** Courtesy of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. RECOMMENDED NATIVE PLANTS FOR LANDSCAPING IN THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY Prepared by the Kerrville Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Texas This descriptive list of native plants was developed for The Kerrville Chapter the use of NPSOT Chapter members and new arrivals to of the Native Plant Society of Texas our community interested in our native flora. Our primary is dedicated to the understanding, criteria were that the plants listed should be: Table of Contents preservation and enjoyment of the native flora ● Suitable for landscaping in the Texas Hill Country of the Texas Hill Country. Information/References ............. Page 2 ● Available through commercial resources as Our chapter meets the container-grown plants or seeds Trees and Shrubs ......................
    [Show full text]