Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp Article Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus spp. Forests (Cupressaceae) with Bark Beetles of Phloeosinus spp. (Scolytinae) from the Northeast of Mexico Hernández-García Juan Alfredo 1,2,3 , Cuellar-Rodríguez Gerardo 1 , Aguirre-Ojeda Nallely Guadalupe 1, Villa-Tanaca Lourdes 2 , Hernández-Rodríguez César 2 and Armendáriz-Toledano Francisco 3,* 1 Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km. 145, Linares, Nuevo León C.P. 67700, Mexico; [email protected] (H.-G.J.A.); [email protected] (C.-R.G.); [email protected] (A.-O.N.G.) 2 Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, Mexico; [email protected] (V.-T.L.); [email protected] (H.-R.C.) 3 Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cto. Zona Deportiva S/N, Ciudad Universitaria. CDMX, Mexico C.P. 04510, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-56-22-92-50 (ext. 47833) Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: Geosmithia members are mitosporic filamentous fungi commonly recorded and isolated from bark beetles of the Scolytinae subfamily and their respective host’s species. This genus includes 18 species formally described and 38 phylogenetic species recorded in several localities from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North and South America, where they exhibit frequent associations with phloeophagous and wood-boring bark beetles. Among phloephagous bark beetle species, specifically, in members of the genus Phloeosinus Chapuis, almost 10% of Geosmithia strains have been isolated. By its physiographic elements and high bark beetle and conifer species richness, Mexico is a potential region to host a high diversity of Geosmithia species and potential new species. In the present study, we systematically sampled and isolated, cultured, and molecularly identified members of the Geosmithia species associated with Phloeosinus spp. and their Juniperus spp. host trees at the north of Sierra Madre Oriental, at Nuevo Leon State, Mexico. Phylogenetic analyses based on 378 internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) sequences supported the presence of strains from Geosmithia langdonii-Geosmithia sp. 32 clade associated with Phloeosinus serratus vector and with Juniperus coahuilensis (JC) host, and the presence of strains from Geosmithia sp. 21-Geosmithia xerotolerans clade with Phloeosinus deleoni and Juniperus flaccida (JF) in this geographical region. The genetic and morphological differences found in our strains with respect to those previously described in the species from both clades (Geosmithia langdonii-Geosmithia sp. 32 and Geosmithia sp. 21-G. xerotolerans) suggest that both Geosmithia lineages from Nuevo Leon correspond to two potential new species in the genus. Keywords: bark beetles; Geosmithia; Phloeosinus; Juniperus 1. Introduction Associations among fungi and bark beetles constitute one of the most successful ecological adaptations that promoted complex and dynamic interactions in this insect group [1]. Most of these Forests 2020, 11, 1142; doi:10.3390/f11111142 www.mdpi.com/journal/forests Forests 2020, 11, 1142 2 of 19 associations are driven by the host tissue within which the beetles develop. Many fungal species are saprophytes on wood and inner bark, but others are nutritional mutualists and facultative or obligate components of wood-boring insects’ diet [2]. Some bark beetles maintain obligatory functional and physiological dependent associations with filamentous fungi [3]. These insects actively cultivate the fungi within the gallery tunnels, constituting agricultural systems that provide a source of food to both larvae and adults, and in some cases, hormones associated with the molting and metamorphosis processes [4]. Bark beetles with facultative associations do not cultivate the fungi and do not need them to complete their life cycle, although in some species they can enrich their diet and increase their fitness [5]. The common fungal species associated with bark beetles belong to eight genera from Basidiomycota (Phlebiopsis Jülich, Entomocorticium Whitney, Bandoni & Oberw) and Ascomycota (Ophiostoma Syd & Syd, Grosmannia Goid, Ceratocystis Ellis & Halst and Leptographium Lagerb & Melin, Raffaelea Arx & Hennebert, Graphilbum Upadhyay & Kendr) [6–8]. Most of them are from Ophiostomatales and Microascales orders, which can be actively cultivated as the sole source of food by almost 30% of bark beetle species [9,10]. However, many other non-incidental fungal species have been recorded in insect galleries and are often understudied, such as species of genus Geosmithia Pitt (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) [10–12]. Geosmithia members are mitosporic filamentous fungi, characterized by macronematous conidiophores that produce large chains of conidia and hydrophobic and dry spores [13]. The current diversity of this genus includes 18 species formally described and 38 phylogenetic species named numerically without a formal taxonomic description [13–25]. These species are widely distributed with records from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North and South America [16,19,23,24], where they exhibit various degrees of specificity with their hosts. Some species are collected from subcortical insects, and other species are sporadically isolated from other substrates such plant debris, soil, and cereals [13,26,27]. While Geosmithia spp. can provide the main nutritional source for their vectors, little is known about the interactions of other symbiotic Geosmithia species with bark beetles. In particular, their role as pathogens remains undetermined [17]. Currently, only Geosmithia morbida Kolarık, Freeland, Utley & Tisserat dispersed by the walnut twig beetle Pityophtorus juglandis Blackman is considered a phytopathogen, which is a serious threat to black walnut trees (Juglans nigra Linnaeus) as it causes thousand cankers disease [17]. Several members of Geosmithia have been recorded and isolated with higher frequency from Scolytinae than from other groups of beetles, which corresponds to 30 genera of bark beetles [11,13–16,19–21,28]. The most diverse group of Geosmithia species is associated with beetle vectors that feed on conifer trees [10,11]. Typically, Geosmithia is found in association with phloephagous and wood-boring bark beetles and their respective host plants [13–15]. Among phloephagous bark beetle species, within members of the genus Phloeosinus Chapuis, almost of 10% of all Geosmithia strains known have been isolated [16,19,29]. Phloeosinus Chapuis (Curculionidae, Scolytinae) is a medium–large bark beetle genus, which includes about 80 species spread among all continents [30–33]. Most of these species breed with members from Cupressaceae (Cupressus sp., Chamaecyparis sp., Thuja sp., Juniperus sp.) [30,34]. The life cycle of Phloesinus species involves feeding and reproduction into the phloem of recently dead trees (branches and trunks), dying trees, or weakened trees [35]. As a consequence of the construction of their galleries, the attacked trees can lose their ornamental appearance and eventually die; nonetheless, when the population growth of these beetles is high, some species produce considerable tree mortality. The ecological role of these insects is to promote the regeneration of natural forests, although in some cases are considered urban pests from an anthropocentric point of view [36]. There are at least 30 reports in the world about the Geosmithia associated with bark beetles (e.g., G. langdonii-Scolytus intricatus; G. proliferans-Phloeotribus frontalis; G. brunnea-Xylosandrus compactus; G. morbida-Pityophthorus juglandis, etc. [19,29]); however, little is known about the overall diversity and vector spectrum of this fungal genus in North America. Current studies indicate that the genus Forests 2020, 11, 1142 3 of 19 in this region is highly diverse based on extensive systematic samplings from several “vector” bark beetles and host plant species. Numerous valid documented and undescribed phylogenetic Geosmithia species have been discovered through sampling from Western and Southeastern USA [19,29]. Species discovery is still a major endeavor of the field of taxonomy. In some taxa, it is calculated that approximately half of the new species are discovered from samplings of only a few specimens and localities. Despite the fact that this practice provides incomplete distribution and morphological data, species discovery from a few specimens/localities provides the necessary information to help taxonomists know it and relative taxa [37]. Because of its physiographic elements and high bark beetle and conifer species richness, Mexico is a region expected to host a high diversity of Geosmithia and potential new fungal species; in spite of this, there are no records of these symbiotic associations in the country. Therefore, we conducted a survey to study bark beetles of the genus Phloeosinus and its host plants in Nuevo Leon state, center of Sierra Madre Oriental (SMOr) Mexico, to explore Geosmithia diversity and determine its possible association with-bark beetles and their plant hosts. The Sierra Madre Oriental (SMOr) is a mountain system considered a biotic unit in different regionalization proposals [38]. Different biomes are distributed within it, which in turn are home to a
Recommended publications
  • Development and Evaluation of Rrna Targeted in Situ Probes and Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fungi
    Development and evaluation of rRNA targeted in situ probes and phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fungi vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Christiane Baschien aus Berlin Von der Fakultät III - Prozesswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. sc. techn. Lutz-Günter Fleischer Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Szewzyk Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Felix Bärlocher Berichter: Dr. habil. Werner Manz Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 19.05.2003 Berlin 2003 D83 Table of contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 MATERIAL AND METHODS .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Used organisms ............................................................................................................................. 8 2. Media, culture conditions, maintenance of cultures and harvest procedure.................................. 9 2.1. Culture media........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Culture conditions .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3. Maintenance of cultures.........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Thousand Cankers Disease Survey Guidelines for 2016
    Thousand Cankers Disease Survey Guidelines for 2016 United States Department of Agriculture: Forest Service (FS) and Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) April 2016 Photo Credits: Lee Pederson (Forest Health Protection, Coeur d Alene, ID), Stacy Hishinuma, UC Davis Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Symptoms ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Survey ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Roles ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sample Collection and Handling .............................................................................................................. 5 Supplies
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Genome Assembly of Geosmithia Morbida, the Causal Agent of Thousand Cankers Disease
    De novo genome assembly of Geosmithia morbida, the causal agent of thousand cankers disease Taruna A. Schuelke1, Anthony Westbrook2, Kirk Broders3, Keith Woeste4 and Matthew D. MacManes1 1 Department of Molecular, Cellular, & Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States 2 Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States 3 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States 4 Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, USDA Forest Service, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States ABSTRACT Geosmithia morbida is a filamentous ascomycete that causes thousand cankers disease in the eastern black walnut tree. This pathogen is commonly found in the western U.S.; however, recently the disease was also detected in several eastern states where the black walnut lumber industry is concentrated. G. morbida is one of two known phytopathogens within the genus Geosmithia, and it is vectored into the host tree via the walnut twig beetle. We present the first de novo draft genome of G. morbida. It is 26.5 Mbp in length and contains less than 1% repetitive elements. The genome possesses an estimated 6,273 genes, 277 of which are predicted to encode proteins with unknown functions. Approximately 31.5% of the proteins in G. morbida are homologous to proteins involved in pathogenicity, and 5.6% of the proteins contain signal peptides that indicate these proteins are secreted. Several studies have investigated the evolution of pathogenicity in pathogens of agricultural crops; forest fungal pathogens are often neglected because research Submitted 21 January 2016 efforts are focused on food crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health of Colorado's Forests
    The Health of Colorado’s Forests Special Issue: Threats to Colorado’s Current and Future Forest Resources 2009 Report Acknowledgements William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo., and Aerial Survey Coordinator, Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS), is the primary author of the 2009 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests. Thanks to the following Colorado State Forest Service employees who served on the Report Working Group and/or provided information, guidance and feedback. Chuck Dennis, Special Projects Forester, Broomfield, Colo. Joe Duda, Forest Management Division Supervisor, Fort Collins, Colo. Jan Hackett, Policy and Legislative Affairs Specialist, Denver, Colo. Meg Halford, Assistant District Forester, Franktown District, Franktown, Colo. Ben Pfohl, Assistant District Forester, Boulder District, Longmont, Colo. Tim Reader, Utilization and Marketing Forester, Durango District, Durango, Colo. Kelly Rogers, District Forester, Grand Junction District, Grand Junction, Colo. Dr. S. Sky Stephens, Entomologist, Fort Collins, Colo. Thanks to those who reviewed and/or provided information for this report: Dr. Donald Bright, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Biodiversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Robert Cain, Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Tony Cheng, Director, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Patricia M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo. Brian Howell, Aerial Survey Program Manager, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Brian Kent, Research Forester, Human Uses, Economics, and Decision Sciences, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colo. Dave Leatherman, Entomologist, CSFS (retired), Fort Collins, Colo.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 716–784 By: P.W
    Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784 By: P.W. Crous, M.J. Wingfield, T.I. Burgess, G.E.St.J. Hardy, J. Gené, J. Guarro, I.G. Baseia, D. García, L.F.P. Gusmão, C.M. Souza-Motta, R. Thangavel, S. Adamčík, A. Barili, C.W. Barnes, J.D.P. Bezerra, J.J. Bordallo, J.F. Cano-Lira, R.J.V. de Oliveira, E. Ercole, V. Hubka, I. Iturrieta-González, A. Kubátová, M.P. Martín, P.-A. Moreau, A. Morte, M.E. Ordoñez, A. Rodríguez, A.M. Stchigel, A. Vizzini, J. Abdollahzadeh, V.P. Abreu, K. Adamčíková, G.M.R. Albuquerque, A.V. Alexandrova, E. Álvarez Duarte, C. Armstrong-Cho, S. Banniza, R.N. Barbosa, J.-M. Bellanger, J.L. Bezerra, T.S. Cabral, M. Caboň, E. Caicedo, T. Cantillo, A.J. Carnegie, L.T. Carmo, R.F. Castañeda-Ruiz, C.R. Clement, A. Čmoková, L.B. Conceição, R.H.S.F. Cruz, U. Damm, B.D.B. da Silva, G.A. da Silva, R.M.F. da Silva, A.L.C.M. de A. Santiago, L.F. de Oliveira, C.A.F. de Souza, F. Déniel, B. Dima, G. Dong, J. Edwards, C.R. Félix, J. Fournier, T.B. Gibertoni, K. Hosaka, T. Iturriaga, M. Jadan, J.-L. Jany, Ž. Jurjević, M. Kolařík, I. Kušan, M.F. Landell, T.R. Leite Cordeiro, D.X. Lima, M. Loizides, S. Luo, A.R. Machado, H. Madrid, O.M.C. Magalhães, P. Marinho, N. Matočec, A. Mešić, A.N. Miller, O.V. Morozova, R.P. Neves, K. Nonaka, A. Nováková, N.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 the Evolutionary Strategy of Claviceps
    Pažoutová S. (2002) Evolutionary strategy of Claviceps. In: Clavicipitalean Fungi: Evolutionary Biology, Chemistry, Biocontrol and Cultural Impacts. White JF, Bacon CW, Hywel-Jones NL (Eds.) Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, pp.329-354. 11 The Evolutionary Strategy of Claviceps Sylvie Pažoutová Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeòská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic 1. INTRODUCTION Members of the genus Claviceps are specialized parasites of grasses, rushes and sedges that specifically infect florets. The host reproductive organs are replaced with a sclerotium. However, it has been shown that after artificial inoculation, C. purpurea can grow and form sclerotia on stem meristems (Lewis, 1956) so that there is a capacity for epiphytic and endophytic growth. C. phalaridis, an Australian endemite, colonizes whole plants of pooid hosts in a way similar to Epichloë and it forms sclerotia in all florets of the infected plant, rendering it sterile (Walker, 1957; 1970). Until now, about 45 teleomorph species of Claviceps have been described, but presumably many species may exist only in anamorphic (sphacelial) stage and therefore go unnoticed. Although C. purpurea is type species for the genus, it is in many aspects untypical, because most Claviceps species originate from tropical regions, colonize panicoid grasses, produce macroconidia and microconidia in their sphacelial stage and are able of microcyclic conidiation from macroconidia. Species on panicoid hosts with monogeneric to polygeneric host ranges predominate. 329 2. PHYLOGENETIC TREE We compared sequences of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA region for 19 species of Claviceps, Database sequences of Myrothecium atroviride (AJ302002) (outgroup from Bionectriaceae), Epichloe amarillans (L07141), Atkinsonella hypoxylon (U57405) and Myriogenospora atramentosa (U57407) were included to root the tree among other related genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Juniperus Species in Turkey and Their Relations with Other Juniperus Based on Cpdna Supervisor: Prof
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY APRIL 2015 Approval of the thesis MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA submitted by AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Supervisor, Dept. of Biological Sciences METU Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof.Dr. Hayri Duman Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. İrfan Kandemir Biology Dept., Ankara University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Date: iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Aysun Demet GÜVENDİREN Signature : iv ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA Güvendiren, Aysun Demet Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis: a Keystone Species for Unraveling Ecosystem Functioning and Biodiversity of Fungi in Tropical Forests?
    Communicative & Integrative Biology ISSN: (Print) 1942-0889 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/kcib20 Ophiocordyceps unilateralis: A keystone species for unraveling ecosystem functioning and biodiversity of fungi in tropical forests? Harry C. Evans, Simon L. Elliot & David P. Hughes To cite this article: Harry C. Evans, Simon L. Elliot & David P. Hughes (2011) Ophiocordyceps unilateralis: A keystone species for unraveling ecosystem functioning and biodiversity of fungi in tropical forests?, Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4:5, 598-602, DOI: 10.4161/cib.16721 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.16721 Copyright © 2011 Landes Bioscience Published online: 01 Sep 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1907 View related articles Citing articles: 23 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=kcib20 Communicative & Integrative Biology 4:5, 598-602; September/October 2011; ©2011 Landes Bioscience Ophiocordyceps unilateralis A keystone species for unraveling ecosystem functioning and biodiversity of fungi in tropical forests? Harry C. Evans,1,* Simon L. Elliot1 and David P. Hughes2 1Department of Entomology; Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV); Viçosa; Minas Gerais, Brazil; 2Department of Entomology and Department of Biology; Penn State University; University Park; PA USA phiocordyceps unilateralis (Ascomy- thus far4—this group of organisms still O cota: Hypocreales) is a specialized receives relatively little press in terms of parasite that infects, manipulates and its biodiversity and the pivotal role it plays kills formicine ants, predominantly in ecosystem functioning. Recently, how- in tropical forest ecosystems. We have ever, the subject has been revisited within reported previously, based on a prelimi- the context of microbes associated with nary study in remnant Atlantic Forest beetles.5 Of the near one million species ©2011 Landesin Minas Gerais (Brazil), thatBioscience.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hypocreales) Proposed for Acceptance Or Rejection
    IMA FUNGUS · VOLUME 4 · no 1: 41–51 doi:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.05 Genera in Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae, and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) ARTICLE proposed for acceptance or rejection Amy Y. Rossman1, Keith A. Seifert2, Gary J. Samuels3, Andrew M. Minnis4, Hans-Josef Schroers5, Lorenzo Lombard6, Pedro W. Crous6, Kadri Põldmaa7, Paul F. Cannon8, Richard C. Summerbell9, David M. Geiser10, Wen-ying Zhuang11, Yuuri Hirooka12, Cesar Herrera13, Catalina Salgado-Salazar13, and Priscila Chaverri13 1Systematic Mycology & Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA; corresponding author e-mail: Amy.Rossman@ ars.usda.gov 2Biodiversity (Mycology), Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada 3321 Hedgehog Mt. Rd., Deering, NH 03244, USA 4Center for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, USDA-U.S. Forest Service, One Gifford Pincheot Dr., Madison, WI 53726, USA 5Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 7Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences and Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia 8Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK 9Sporometrics, Inc., 219 Dufferin Street, Suite 20C, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6K 1Y9 10Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, 121 Buckhout Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA 11State
    [Show full text]