DOCSLIB.ORG

San Mateo County Important Farmland 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Mateo County Important Farmland 2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor SAN MATEO COUNTY THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION John Laird, Secretary DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCE PROTECTION David Bunn, Director IMPORTANT FARMLAND 2014 FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM -122°30'0" -122°22'30" -122°15'0" -122°7'30" A L A PRIME FARMLAND M T 3 S Golf SAN FRANCISCO CO E Course D 82 Substation A PRIME FARMLAND HAS THE BEST COMBINATION OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL FEATURES 3 280 101 C ABLE TO SUSTAIN LONG-TERM AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. THIS LAND HAS THE SOIL U O 35 N QUALITY, GROWING SEASON, AND MOISTURE SUPPLY NEEDED TO PRODUCE SUSTAINED I O U N CANADA DE GUADALUPE P HIGH YIELDS. LAND MUST HAVE BEEN USED FOR IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION VISITACION Y RODEO VIEJO AT SOME TIME DURING THE FOUR YEARS PRIOR TO THE MAPPING DATE. W S 6 a R n Radio Towers Golf Course B Daly City ru Hosp no Brisbane FARMLAND OF STATEWIDE IMPORTANCE Mo Colma unt Sierra ain Point FARMLAND OF STATEWIDE IMPORTANCE IS SIMILAR TO PRIME FARMLAND BUT WITH MINOR Cemetery SHORTCOMINGS, SUCH AS GREATER SLOPES OR LESS ABILITY TO STORE SOIL MOISTURE. P A C Oyster Pt I LAND MUST HAVE BEEN USED FOR IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AT SOME TIME F 177 S IC DURING THE FOUR YEARS PRIOR TO THE MAPPING DATE. A Point San Bruno N Edgemar UNIQUE FARMLAND Golf M Course ia B g UNIQUE FARMLAND CONSISTS OF LESSER QUALITY SOILS USED FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ra South San Francisco R U THE STATE'S LEADING AGRICULTURAL CROPS. THIS LAND IS USUALLY IRRIGATED, BUT MAY id g e F INCLUDE NONIRRIGATED ORCHARDS OR VINEYARDS AS FOUND IN SOME CLIMATIC ZONES R 330 Pacifica GOLDEN GATE IN CALIFORNIA. LAND MUST HAVE BEEN CROPPED AT SOME TIME DURING THE FOUR YEARS NAT CEM R I La gun a Skyline US NAV PRIOR TO THE MAPPING DATE. Sala da College RES A 37°37'30" SHARP Sw ee ne y Rid ge San Bruno PARK Sk y lin e P re se rve N San Francisco Mori Point International Airport S A N C FARMLAND OF LOCAL IMPORTANCE P E D R O 35 37°37'30" Vallemar S 280 B w I e LANDS OTHER THAN PRIME, STATEWIDE, OR UNIQUE THAT PRODUCE THE FOLLOWING Rockaway U SANCHEZ e Ju n ip e ro S erra S Beach n CROPS: OATS, CHRISTMAS TREES, PUMPKINS, DRYLAND PASTURE, OTHER GRAINS, AND Cattle Hill Cou n ty P ark e R y C HAYLANDS. THESE LANDS ARE NOT IRRIGATED. Golf Course I R O Shelter Cove UE E i Q G d A RID San Andreas B g Millbrae Point San Pedro S k e Lake EO a r 82 AT L) S n o 8 M OL GRAZING LAND a F Coyote SAN (T n P Burlingame Hospital Point COYOTE POINT ed Linda Mar k P r h ee ed o rt B r COUNTY PARK GRAZING LAND IS LAND ON WHICH THE EXISTING VEGETATION IS SUITED TO THE GRAZING ro o C Va N u S C lle r OF LIVESTOCK. a y re Golf n e i k SAN PEDRO VALLEY Course P B ek Substation 92 B e ek re d COUNTY PARK re C ro u C Devils M n S id S r o 1 M o d i A Slide t le a i s n u S rk a t Fo n h P Little URBAN AND BUILT-UP LAND A S z e Golf Coyote Point Y F 348 M a N h k c Course w n a a S URBAN AND BUILT-UP LAND IS OCCUPIED BY STRUCTURES WITH A BUILDING DENSITY OF t y e R o e F i S A AT LEAST 1 UNIT TO 1.5 ACRES, OR APPROXIMATELY 6 STRUCTURES TO A 10-ACRE PARCEL. North Pk 579 r R d N MATEO Hospital ek ek e W W g e r T A r COMMON EXAMPLES INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, INSTITUTIONAL C 6 5 C C Montara U e M D Foste i o 25 R R E N r City n Knob n U FACILITIES, CEMETERIES, AIRPORTS, GOLF COURSES, SANITARY LANDFILLS, SEWAGE i AQ Hil rt ta R C lsborough Brewer Island a r i M a d I F TREATMENT, AND WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES. Pilarcitos g S L San Mateo S U S A e M o l N N Montara Lake C e u A E t T FR Beach a Substa W A O N M M Bay Slu IL C D I k o Black L SC e 206 Radio IF O re u C Mtn E Montara C n r n Towers R B t e F S a Golf Bay Meadows E AY OTHER LAND 31 a e S FU Point Montara k T Course Racetrack G te in 36 E n ek E A t ce re n i C T 4 S T College of o OTHER LAND IS LAND NOT INCLUDED IN ANY OTHER MAPPING CATEGORY. COMMON EXAMPLES V m l T L5 S C E Sa L n Mateo e h INCLUDE LOW DENSITY RURAL DEVELOPMENTS, BRUSH, TIMBER, WETLAND, AND RIPARIAN AREAS n o Scarper eek T 4 S a n a Cr B g d Redwood Moss Beach S o c u n st k Peak h P Radio T 5 S o la Point i s o l s NOT SUITABLE FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING, CONFINED LIVESTOCK, POULTRY, OR AQUACULTURE nn 6 i I lh l S I e ll e re Towers D F m au Hospital r 536 u L U e ir FACILITIES, STRIP MINES, BORROW PITS, AND WATER BODIES SMALLER THAN 40 ACRES. VACANT s g a C Z I N Redwood r B r Ox Hill C IO e C O R R A L D E e S b T I E R R A e r N Sh AND NONAGRICULTURAL LAND SURROUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND k P e ores n Seal C Lower H e i ove u e (PALOMARES) k Belmont lg t Crystal Springs Res S W W GREATER THAN 40 ACRES IS MAPPED AS OTHER LAND. A a r rr R s 4 5 o Half M oo n Bay y i C o R R R k d d e i Greco Airp o rt e g A d College of e P g r e e A Island k e N Notre Dame n ek C d E e e l n Grana C r da S C I San Carlos o e o D F Wes r IC o tpo y Belmont in M A Airport t Princeton C t w n Ox Mountain n P e ort of N 92 mo Hill Smit d SAN FRANCISCO BAY WATER d h a Landf l iN ll e e s B R NAT WI i G edwood City LDLIFE REFUGE o o R n C S Ravenswood 37°30'0" i u lu a l f 35 A 283 P Point f Sa Pillar Point o n Carlos PERENNIAL WATER BODIES WITH AN EXTENT OF AT LEAST 40 ACRES. m Sk y la wn Me m Ga rde n s n s 92 Pulgas h a e M Pillar Point Harbor c p 14 (Ce m ete ry) Slu g H n A E e g H A a r i A Miram C U ar F l D r Upper N R 37°30'0" f L e F e a k Crystal Springs Res R D v M rt k e e C e n CORRAL DE TIERRA lb e s O A a E R r w M O n C y 35 o N (VASQUEZ) F E L o Substation o o Hosp d A n U 2 S L B k l o e A u A n A e G M Y r S P ULG E 92 C E AS 84 D S TU G T Sequoia A k NN A E e L Hospital PACIFIC T 1 e C r B E Redwood City NION O C U a s Henderson AQUEDUCT B Eagle HY o M HE HETC y E TCH t a Hill A i 187 d A c on C r na a H u la C 120 g O i Edgewood A C 84 US VETERANS East Palo Alto P A Co Park e Creek d HOSPITAL A ~ R S R N A SCA LE: 1:100,000 L A I jo 13 SANTA 1 inch represents approximately 1.6 miles Half Moon Bay s F O USGS C M ll o IRAMONTES i 36 D T oy Atherton H W W r Western Region Hdqrs M 31 Ar 101 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i 5 4 W g 82 A g A e R R st Kilometers rr i n ~ o s T 5 S Z Canada y D College o T 6 S U O Menlo Park 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Golf K n n E i N Course Miles Can in o yon o n Le 1 g E 6 s R Woodside M A C Glens Miramontes o r u Y 149 Point n k t e a Huddart Bear Gulch e i M r n Co Park Reservoir Golf C U Woodside 10 40 The minimum land use Course mapping unit is 10 acres, N except Water, which is Summit AQ a D UED n mapped to a minimum of Bear UC i SpringS T 40 acres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Issue
    t ,~, ~'i - annual report issue ~.. .,; ~~~ ~~ ~ \ ~ _ ~ , -w,A ~ ~ w Letters of Transmitta December 19, 1966 December 20, 1966 MR. JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of CaPifornia State of California My Dear Governor: Sir: Dear am pleased to submit to you the 20th Annual Report of am submitting herewith for your approval and transmittal the Division of Highways. to the Governor, the 20th Annual Reporf of the Division of Done in a shorter, more popularized form, this year's report, Highways for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1966. The report believe, still presents the highlights of how the nation's most was prepared in compliance with Section 143 of the Streets populous state is meeting and overcoming the challenge of an and Highways Code. ever increasing traffic demand by moving ahead in the con- As before, the text portion of the report with accompanying struction of what is undoub#edly the world's finest highway and illustrations is being published as the November—December freeway system. issue of Ca`ifornia Highways and Public Works magazine. De- Totaling some 14,215 miles at the end of the fiscal year, tailed financial statements, tables and contract statistics will the state highway system included 1,945 miles of freeways. appear in a supplement which will be available to anyone on Though comprising only 2 percent of the state's paved driving request. surfaces, these freeways carry a quarter of the state's traffic Although a large portion of the past fiscal year's highway load and have proved three times as safe to drive upon as program continued to be devoted to completion of the inter- conventional highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 11 COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 22, 2011 INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT 99-054-03 Project Manager: Marilyn Latta RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consideration and possible Conservancy authorization to disburse up to $1,000,000 for 2011 and 2012 revegetation activities, including planning, seedling propagation, planting of native seedlings and revegetation monitoring and maintenance, as part of the 2011 permitting for the Invasive Spartina Project within the San Francisco Estuary. LOCATION: Sites within the Invasive Spartina Project treatment areas in San Francisco Bay and lower creek channels of the nine counties that bound the San Francisco Bay. PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: March 17, 2011 Staff Recommendation [Note: Copies of exhibits to this March 17 staff recommendation will be provided to Conservancy members and may be found at: www.scc.ca.gov] Exhibit 2: August 8, 2011 Draft Revegetation and Monitoring Plan RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Chapter 4.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the following: 1. Disbursement of up to $650,000 (six hundred fifty thousand dollars) for two years of planning and implementation of revegetation projects to increase native vegetation as part of the ongoing invasive and hybrid Spartina treatment and eradication projects under the Invasive Spartina Project (ISP) Control Program. These grant funds may be used for seedling propagation, on-the-ground planting of native seedlings, and revegetation monitoring and maintenance and may augment existing grants to the California Wildlife Foundation and the Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed or may be disbursed to a new grantee, Save San Francisco Bay Association.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 Annual Report
    555 County Center P 650.599.1406 Redwood City, CA 94063 F 650.361.8227 flowstobay.org September 15, 2011 Bruce Wolfe, Executive Officer San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400 Oakland, CA 94612 Mr. Wolfe: SUBJECT: SUBMITTAL OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM’S FY 2010/11 ANNUAL REPORT The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (Countywide Program) is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Report. This report describes municipal regional stormwater permit (MRP) compliance activities conducted at the regional and countywide levels. This report incorporates by reference the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association’s (BASMAA) Regional Supplements1 to the annual report for monitoring/POCs and training and outreach. The Countywide Program Portion of the Annual Report FY 2010/11 describes MRP implementation tasks undertaken at the countywide level for the benefit of the Countywide Program’s member agencies. In response to Notices of Violation (NOV) issued to various San Mateo jurisdictions for their 2009/10 annual reports, the Countywide Program has taken several proactive steps to improve reporting for the 2010/11 fiscal year. On July 6, C/CAG sent a memo to all City/County/Town Managers alerting them to the recent NOVs and emphasizing the importance of meeting MRP requirements; this issue was discussed in person with City Managers at their July 15 and August 19 association meetings. The Countywide Program hosted a municipal training session specific to annual reporting on July 20 that was very well attended. Countywide Program staff met individually with several jurisdictions’ staffs to assist with NOV responses and review of annual reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8b69q7nx Online items available Inventory of the Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990 MacKenzie Bennett, Meredith Hall, April Hesik under the supervision of Laura Tatum Environmental Design Archives College of Environmental Design 230 Wurster Hall #1820 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-1820 Phone: (510) 642-5124 Fax: (510) 642-2824 Email: [email protected] http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/cedarchives/ © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Robert N. 1999-12 1 Royston Collection, 1941-1990 Inventory of the Robert N. Royston Collection, 1941-1990 Collection number: 1999-12 Environmental Design Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Processed by: MacKenzie Bennett, Meredith Hall, April Hesik under the supervision of Laura Tatum Date Completed: December 2004 Encoded by: Dayna Holz © 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Robert N. Royston collection Dates: 1941-1990 Bulk Dates: 1946-1971 Collection number: 1999-12 Creator: Royston, Robert N., 1918- Collection Size: 1 manuscript box, 95 cartons, 24 cartons (folded drawings), 17 Flat File drawers Repository: Environmental Design Archives. College of Environmental Design. University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, California Abstract: Contains records related to the life and career of landscape architect Robert N. Royston. The vast majority of this collection documents the projects of Royston's various firms, with a much smaller representation of Royston's work outside the firm in the professional or academic context. Of particular interest is Royston's participation in the landscape design for various sub-divisions and individual houses built by Eichler Homes and T.
    [Show full text]
  • By Russel A. Estep - 1992-1993
    - fJll'.'im'T LIBRARY, 1110 ALA, 1EnA - BEUIO::r, CALIF. 94002 :L - - Vol. 11 CARLMONT HI STORY By Russel A. Estep - 1992-1993 - INDEX 1. Early People in Belmont. ? The Reid School In Belmont. 3:About Some Belmont Subdivisions. 4. Early Club Fundraisers. 5. An early Belmonter Visits Hawaii in 1881. 6. Prohibition Comes to Belmont. 7. When Moffett Field Was Built in 1931. 8. Mrs. Alpheus Bull Purchased the Ralston Estate. 9. Some Large Fires in Belmont. 10. Ham Radio Operators helped Belmont. 11. Medical Help In Early Belmont. 12. Bnsiness Licenses in Early Belmont. 13�Constructing Early Homes in Belmont. 14. f ourth of July Parade in Belmont. 15. Belmont was the First County Seat. 16. Goint to Half Moon Bay In Early Days. 17. Ivan F. Phipps came Here and Made Exchanges of Property. 18. Hauling Hay With Rattlesnakes In It .. 19. Belmont Was Called WAterview At First. 20. At torney Mezes Fee For Clearinq Titles. 21, Morgan Oyster Company. ') , L,. - • Kinq Kalakua Stays At The Ralston House. 23. Man-' Birds in Belmont. 24. Vi�iting the Hawaii CApitol. 25. When a Large Chicken House Burned. 26. Dr. Lee Gambitz Lived In Belmont. 27. Brewers Island Became Foster City. 28. A Large House on Lake Street Became California Sanitarium. 29. c rystal Springs Lake West of Belmont. 30. Activities at 125 Dale Avenue in San Carlos. 31. Ralston Helped Sharon Become a Director of his Bank. 32. There is Shallow Hardpan Under Belmont. 33. Wagons Were Greased With Bear Grease in Belmont. 34. Coming West in 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Coastal Conservancy
    Exhibit 1: April 24, 2008 Staff Recommendation COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation April 24, 2008 INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT (ISP) PHASE II-CONTROL PROGRAM 2008-2010 IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROL PROGRAM File No. 99-054 Project Manager: Maxene Spellman RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to 1) accept an augmentation in the amount of $249,425 to an existing grant from the Wildlife Conservation Board to implement the Invasive Spartina Project (ISP) Control Program and disburse the full amount of the augmentation for 2008 treatment and eradication projects within the San Francisco Estuary; and 2) disburse up to $1,972,190 of Conservancy funds to implement the ISP Control Program for 2008 for treatment and eradication projects within the San Francisco Estuary, and for environmental consulting services needed to operate and manage the ISP Control Program through spring of 2010. LOCATION: The baylands and lower creek channels of the nine counties that bound the San Francisco Bay. PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy ________________________________________________________________________ EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: September 25, 2003 Staff Recommendation Exhibit 2: June 16, 2005 Staff Recommendation Exhibit 3: Map of 2008 Treatment Sites Exhibit 4: Map of Coastal Marin Infestations Exhibit 5: Map of North San Pablo Bay Treatment Sites Exhibit 6: Invasive Spartina Control Plans for the San Francisco Estuary, 2008-2010 Control Seasons Attachment 1: Spartina Control Site Maps Attachment 2: Impact and Mitigation Checklists Exhibit 7: May 24, 2007 Staff Recommendation Exhibit 1: April 24, 2008 Staff Recommendation INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT (ISP) PHASE II- CONTROL PROGRAM ________________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Chapter 4.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the following: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Votes to Approve Boat Rental
    ph 650-574-5952 fax 650-240-3870 Foster City’s Oldest Local Weekly Newspaper email: [email protected] Published every Wednesday for 40 years August 21, 2013 City Council Votes to Approve Boat COUNCIL CORNER Rental and to Support Bowditch Plan Bay Area – Part 2 Bond Measure This article is the follow on to coverage of the “Plan Bay Area.” City Council Approves by Councilmember Art Kiesel Contract With Edgewater n the Draft Environmental Impact Marine to Rent Boats on Report (EIR), there is a section on the Lagoon IGlobal Climate Change. It is noted that Parks and Recreation Director, we can experience “sea level rise and Kevin Miller, appeared increased storm surge during the latter before the City Council and half of the 20th century.” recommended that the Council It goes on to state that there are pass a resolution approving a projections of a sea level rise of seven contract with Edgewater LLC to 23 inches by the end of the century. to rent electric boats on the I have listened to presentations and one Lagoon. The resolution would in particular from the Bay Conservation allow Edgewater to exclusively and Development Commission (BCDC) but the increased housing as well? operate a concession which suggesting that we should prepare for a The water life cycle starts with snow in the provides a non-captained sea level rise of 4 feet by the end of this winter months landing on the mountain electric boat rental program century. The San Francisco Bay has 1,000 tops. It then melts slowly during the spring on the Foster City lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D – Cultural Resources
    APPENDIX D Cultural Resources Reports Historical Evaluation of Foster City and the Foster City Levee System San Mateo County, California Vicki R. Beard, M.A. June 21, 2016 Historical Evaluation of the Foster City Levees San Mateo County, California Prepared by: ___________________________ Vicki R. Beard, M.A. Tom Origer & Associates Post Office Box 1531 Rohnert Park, California 94927 (707) 584-8200 (707) 584-8300 (fax) Prepared for: Carla Violet Urban Planning Partners, Inc. 507 17th Street, 2nd Floor Oakland, California 94612 June 21, 2016 ABSTRACT Tom Origer & Associates completed an historical evaluation for the Foster City Levee Protection and Improvements Project EIR being prepared by Urban Planning Partners, Inc. Recent studies found that much of the Foster City levee system does not meet Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements for accreditation, and that improvements are necessary to maintain its accreditation as a low-risk flood area. In order to evaluate the levee system's importance, it was necessary to consider the whole of Foster City as a resource because of the unique correlation between the two. This evaluation was designed to determine Foster City's potential for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources based on the eligibility criteria set forth in Title 14 CCR, §4852. The study found that Foster City, and subsequently the levee system, meets California Register criteria 1 and 3 through its association with the post World War II, modern new town movement. In addition to this report, Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms were completed and are provided in Appendix A. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at Tom Origer & Associates (File No.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents - Appendices 1 of 2
    Table of Contents - Appendices 1 of 2 Appendices Appendix AQ Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment Appendix BIO Biological Assessment Appendix CUL Cultural Resources Memorandum PLN19-0037 903 Manor Blvd. Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix $4 ŝƌYƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚ,ĞĂůƚŚZŝƐŬƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ MEMO Date: January 17, 2020 To: Ashley Munce From: Michael Keinath Sarah Manzano Michael Howley Subject: CEQA AIR QUALITY AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A NEW DEVELOPMENT AT 903 MANOR BLVD, SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA Ramboll US Corporation (Ramboll) conducted California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analyses of greenhouse gases (GHGs), criteria air pollutants (CAPs) and precursors, as well as a health risk assessment (HRA), from construction and Ramboll 201 California Street operations of a new development consisting of the demolition of an existing bowling Suite 201 alley and the construction of 39 residential units totaling 102,100 square feet (the San Francisco, CA 94111 “Project”). The Project is located at 903 Manor Blvd. in San Leandro, California. USA Ramboll assumed construction activities will include demolition, site preparation, T +1 415 796 1950 F +1 415 398 5812 grading activities, building construction, architectural coating, and paving. Based on www.ramboll.com information from the Project Sponsor, the Project will begin construction in 2021, and will require approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil import. For all other construction information in this assessment, including scheduling, on-road trips, and off-road equipment, Ramboll relied on CalEEMod®1 default values (see Appendix A). The Project Area location, as well as surrounding receptors and sensitive receptor locations, is presented in Figure 1. CEQA THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The City of San Leandro is the lead agency responsible for Project approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting`' 23 24 25A 26
    O MEETING ` o f omen or amenorataiitra WOMB or r.amsronot • 0 0 "MEETING OF STATE LANDS COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA January 26, 1966 *****4! 5 PARTICIPANTS: 6 TIM STATE LANDS COMMISSION 0- , 7 - „lion. Houston I. Flournoy,. Conitoller, chairm0 o , 8 Hort. Robert H: Finch,-:Lieutenant Covernor 9 GordonT. -Smith, Director(lof Finance 10 11 Mr. F. J. ellortig Executive Officer 12 13 OFFICE„OF THE ATIGRNEY GENERAL Itr.Jay L. Shavelson, assistant Attorney General' 15 Mi. N. Grey Tayloreputy Attorney General 17 APPEkRANCES: (In the older of their appearance) 'Mr. Robert Kinzie Santa Cruz Yacht Club, Inc. 20 Mr. Kenneth K. Williams Deputy City Attorney, City of Long Beach lir. Richard Dombrink Ghieffof_ Real Estate Branch, 'Alameda= 23 `r'-%,9-7,ettnty Flood Control and Water Conaervatiow, Ms trict - 24. Mrs. Helen-Lyons Freeman 25 President, Alameda 'Conservation Assoziation 28 (continued)- IIIMP1C11111• assmarraxnvi POCKNOVINII. OUTS Of CALI MIMI - Mr. William'Siri President, Save the San Francisco, Bay Ass 6 Mr. LouisButler Save the San Francisco -Bay Association Harry ` jacksc— Secretary, Leslie Salt Co. me. W filter Cooper Resident, Focter City 0 ° O INDE (In accordance with calendar Summary) -ITEM ON PAGE OF PAGE OF ITEM CLASSIFICATION CALENDAR CALVIDAR ,TRANSCRIPT: i I. Cali to_order PERMITS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS- AY, NO FEE: / 07(0 City of San Matio , 1 (b) Pacific Tel; & TeL Co. (c) South an Luis Obispo ,county Sanitation Dist. - (d) State of California, Dept. Public Works Div. of Highways (e) ,Trans'-Bay ConatrUctors 34 PERMITS, EASEMENTS LEASES, - '--- RIGHTS-OF-WAY, FEE: O (ix) Santa Cruz 'Yacht Club Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Menlo Park Emergency Operation Plan 2014
    CITY OF MENLO PARK EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN 2014 Disclaimer The material presented in this publication has been written in accordance with federal and state guidelines to meet current industry standards. However, this plan cannot anticipate all possible emergency events and situations or emergency responses. Therefore, it should not be used without competent review, verification, and correction (where appropriate) by qualified emergency management professionals. It should be tested by the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) team after they have received appropriate emergency management training. Conditions will develop in operations where standard methods will not suffice and nothing in this manual shall be interpreted as an obstacle to the experience, initiative, and ingenuity of the officers in overcoming the complexities that exist under actual emergency conditions. Users of this plan assume all liability arising from the plan’s use. The Emergency Management Consultant's Emergency Operations Plan © Prepared for the use by the City of Menlo Park By Emergency Management Consultants & City of Menlo Park Menlo Park Fire Protection District Menlo Park Police Department Note: The original document template has been edited by the staff of the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Area Office of Emergency Services and Homeland Security and the staff of the City of Menlo Park. This plan was partly funded through a grant from the US Department of Homeland Security. CITY OF MENLO PARK VOLUME TWO – BASIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]