DOCSLIB.ORG

Tonto National Forest 2324 East Mcdowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tonto National Forest 2324 East Mcdowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 AESO/SE 2-21-99-F-300 February 28, 2002 Mr. Karl Siderits Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Dear Mr. Siderits: Attached is the final biological opinion for ongoing grazing management on 20 allotments on the Tonto National Forest. Your March 30, 1999, request for formal consultation pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, was received March 30, 1999. By letter of May 25, 1999, we requested more information and requested a 60-day extension to the 90-day consultation period. You responded to our information request by letter dated July 9, 1999, and concurred with our request to extend the consultation period. You also changed the effect determinations for the Mexican long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris nivalis) to no effect. Your letter dated February 25, 2000, changed the proposed action and the effect determinations for about 10 allotments. Also, your June 21, 2000, letter contained an amendment to the biological evaluation, and your July 11, 2000, letter provided additional information. The amendment made major changes to the proposed action. Livestock were removed from six allotments, other parts of the proposed action were changed, and many species effect determinations were changed. Because of these major changes, the date of initiation for this formal consultation is June 21, 2000, the date the biological assessment amendment was received by our office. As a result of various changes to the original biological assessment, this biological opinion now covers proposed livestock grazing on 20 allotments. We released a draft biological opinion on February 19, 2001. We received comments on that draft on June 6, 2001, and August 23, 2001. We also incorporated your March 12, 2001, and April 2, 2001, biological assessments (USDA Forest Service 2001a, USDA Forest Service 2001b) of the effects of the Forest’s ongoing grazing on critical habitat of loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis) and spikedace (Meda fulgida) for those allotments which were already in consultation (7/K, Buzzard Roost, Christopher Mr. Karl Siderits 2 Mountain/Ellinwood, Deadman Mesa, Devil’s Canyon, H-4, Payson/Cross V, Seventy Six, Star Valley, and Tonto Basin). Our biological opinion concludes consultation on loach minnow and spikedace critical habitat for these ten allotments. The following listed species are addressed in this consultation: lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curosoae yerbabuenae), desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius), cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis mexicana), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), woundfin (Plagopterus argentissimus), Arizona agave (Agave arizonica), Arizona hedgehog (Echinocereus triglochidatus) bonytail chub (Gila elegans), Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis), spikedace with critical habitat, loach minnow with critical habitat, and the razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). We recommend that the Tonto National Forest package all reports and monitoring data required or recommended in this biological opinion into an annual report due December 1 of each year. The first annual report will be due December 1, 2002. We suggest this reporting date for all past and future opinions so that only one report would be required for all consultations, greatly simplifying your efforts to assemble this information and our efforts to assimilate it. We would like to suggest a strategy for completing consultation for remaining allotments on the Forest. We suggest a programmatic approach that would in one opinion: 1) address all remaining allotments for which grazing activities may affect listed species or critical habitat, 2) make the term of the proposed action long, for instance 10 years, and not tie it to permit issuance for individual allotments, and 3) the opinion would be programmatic in that it would address the grazing program, but all grazing and grazing-related activities (including range improvement project construction and maintenance) would be addressed and covered under section 7 to the project level. We may also want to include the 20 allotments in this new consultation for the purpose of specifically addressing range improvement projects and extending the term of the proposed action to match whatever term we agree upon for the remaining allotments. As changes in allotment management are made in the future, these changes could be addressed by amendments or reinitiation of consultation. Our experience is that such an approach is much more efficient in regard to staff time than our current approach of consulting on batches of allotments of varying term, or consultation on individual allotments. It is also the most efficient way to ensure the Forest and its permittees have adequately addressed Endangered Species Act compliance. We look forward to working with you on a programmatic grazing consultation. We have assigned log number 2-21-99-F-300 to this consultation. Please refer to that number in future correspondence on this consultation. If you have questions regarding this letter or the Mr. Karl Siderits 3 opinion, please contact Glen Knowles (602/242-0210) or Sherry Barrett (520/670-4617). We appreciate your assistance and cooperation in the completion of this biological opinion, as well as your continuing efforts in the conservation of listed species. Sincerely, /s/ David L. Harlow Field Supervisor Enclosure cc’s w/enclosure: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM (ARD-ES) Assistant Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Flagstaff, AZ Office Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Flagstaff, AZ Supervisor, Arizona Fishery Resource Office, Pinetop, AZ Director, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ Regional Supervisor, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Mesa, AZ Director, Arizona Cattle Growers Association, Phoenix, AZ Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, AZ Forest Guardians, Santa Fe, NM W:\Glen Knowles\Tonto 20 Allotment.wpd:cgg BIOLOGICAL OPINION On-going and Long-term Grazing on the Tonto National Forest Arizona Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service AESO/SE 2-21-99-F-300 February 28, 2002 1 BIOLOGICAL OPINION Ongoing and Long-term Grazing on the Tonto National Forest This biological opinion was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) based on our review of the proposed Ongoing and Long-term Grazing on the Tonto National Forest (Forest), as amended, in Arizona (Maricopa, Gila, Yavapai, Pinal counties), and its effects on the endangered bonytail chub (Gila elegans) with critical habitat, threatened loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis) with critical habitat, endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) with critical habitat, endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) with critical habitat, threatened spikedace (Meda fulgida) with critical habitat, endangered Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis), endangered desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius) with critical habitat, endangered woundfin (Plagopterus argentissimus), endangered Arizona agave (Agave arizonica), endangered Arizona hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus triglochidatus var. arizonica), endangered lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), endangered cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum), threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) with critical habitat, and endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). The Forest also requested Service concurrence that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect listed species or is not likely to jeopardize proposed or experimental, non-essential populations. The Service concurs with all of these determinations for bonytail chub, loach minnow, razorback sucker, spikedace, Gila topminnow, desert pupfish, woundfin, Arizona agave, Arizona hedgehog cactus, lesser long-nosed bat, bald eagle, southwestern willow flycatcher, Mexican spotted owl, Colorado pikeminnow, and woundfin for specific allotments. The basis for our concurrences is found in Appendix B. The American peregrine falcon was removed from the Federal list of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife on August 25, 1999 (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1999a). Federal agencies are no longer required to consult with the Service under section 7 of the Act in the event activities they authorize, fund, or carry out affect peregrine falcons. However, removal of the protection of the Act will not affect the protection afforded all peregrine falcons under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In addition, the Act requires monitoring of the species for at least five years after delisting. This monitoring will consist, at a minimum, of annual occupancy surveys, assessing productivity, determining contaminant concentrations, and monitoring levels of take of peregrine falcons for falconry purposes (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1998d). The Service is currently developing a monitoring plan which will be available in the near future. Since the initiation of consultation, the proposed listing for the Chiricahua dock
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008
    United States Department of Forest Insect and Agriculture Forest Disease Conditions in Service Southwestern the Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Region, 2008 July 2009 PR-R3-16-5 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Pandora moth caterpillar collected on the North Kaibab Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008 Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Regional Office Salomon Ramirez, Director Allen White, Pesticide Specialist Forest Health Zones Offices Arizona Zone John Anhold, Zone Leader Mary Lou Fairweather, Pathologist Roberta Fitzgibbon, Entomologist Joel McMillin, Entomologist
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Tumamoc Hill Management Plan
    TUMAMOC HILL CUL T URAL RESOURCES POLICY AND MANAGEMEN T PLAN September 2008 This project was financed in part by a grant from the Historic Preservation Heritage Fund which is funded by the Arizona Lottery and administered by the Arizona State Parks Board UNIVERSI T Y OF ARIZONA TUMAMOC HILL CUL T URAL RESOURCES POLICY AND MANAGEMEN T PLAN Project Team Project University of Arizona Campus & Facilities Planning David Duffy, AICP, Director, retired Ed Galda, AICP, Campus Planner John T. Fey, Associate Director Susan Bartlett, retired Arizona State Museum John Madsen, Associate Curator of Archaeology Nancy Pearson, Research Specialist Nancy Odegaard, Chair, Historic Preservation Committee Paul Fish, Curator of Archaeology Suzanne Fish, Curator of Archaeology Todd Pitezel, Archaeologist College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture Brooks Jeffery, Associate Dean and Coordinator of Preservation Studies Tumamoc Hill Lynda C. Klasky, College of Science U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Western Archaeological and Conservation Center Jeffery Burton, Archaeologist Consultant Team Cultural Affairs Office, Tohono O’odham Nation Peter Steere Joseph Joaquin September 2008 UNIVERSI T Y OF ARIZONA TUMAMOC HILL CUL T URAL RESOURCES POLICY AND MANAGEMEN T PLAN Cultural Resources Department, Gila River Indian Community Barnaby V. Lewis Pima County Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation Office Linda Mayro Project Team Project Loy C. Neff Tumamoc Hill Advisory Group, 1982 Gayle Hartmann Contributing Authors Jeffery Burton John Madsen Nancy Pearson R. Emerson Howell Henry Wallace Paul R. Fish Suzanne K. Fish Mathew Pailes Jan Bowers Julio Betancourt September 2008 UNIVERSI T Y OF ARIZONA TUMAMOC HILL CUL T URAL RESOURCES POLICY AND MANAGEMEN T PLAN This project was financed in part by a grant from the Historic Preservation Heritage Fund, which is funded by the Arizona Lottery and administered by the Arizona State Acknowledgments Parks Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Relocation Guide
    ARIZONA RELOCATION GUIDE WELCOME TO THE VALLEY OF THE SUN Landmark Title is proud to present the greatest selection of golf courses. As the following relocation guide! If you are cultural hub of the Southwest, Phoenix is thinking of moving to the Valley of the also a leader in the business world. Sun, the following will help you kick The cost of living compared with high start your move to the wonderful quality of life is favorable com- greater Phoenix area. pared to other national cities. FUN FACT: Arizona is a popular destination and is We hope you experience and growing every year. There are plenty of enjoy everything this state that Arizona’s flag features a copper-colored activities to partake in, which is easy to we call home, has to offer. star, acknowledging the state’s leading do with 300+ days of sunshine! role in cooper when it produced 60% of the total for the United States. There is something for everyone; the outdoor enthusiast, recreational activities, hospitality, dining and shopping, not to mention the nation’s 3 HISTORY OF THE VALLEY Once known as the Arizona Territory, built homes in, what was known as, By the time the United States entered WW the Valley of the Sun contained one Pumkinville where Swilling had planted II, one of the 7 natural wonders of the of the main routes to the gold fields in the gourds along the canal banks. Duppa world, the Grand Canyon, had become California. Although gold and silver were presented the name of Phoenix as related a national park, Route 66 was competed discovered in some Arizona rivers and to the story of the rebirth of the mythical and Pluto had been discovered at the mountains during the 1860’s, copper bird born from the ashes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 General Management Plan
    Montezuma Castle National Monument National Park Service Mo n t e z u M a Ca s t l e na t i o n a l Mo n u M e n t • tu z i g o o t na t i o n a l Mo n u M e n t Tuzigoot National Monument U.S. Department of the Interior ge n e r a l Ma n a g e M e n t Pl a n /en v i r o n M e n t a l as s e s s M e n t Arizona M o n t e z u MONTEZU M A CASTLE MONTEZU M A WELL TUZIGOOT M g a e n e r a l C a s t l e M n a n a g e a t i o n a l M e n t M P o n u l a n M / e n t e n v i r o n • t u z i g o o t M e n t a l n a a t i o n a l s s e s s M e n t M o n u M e n t na t i o n a l Pa r k se r v i C e • u.s. De P a r t M e n t o f t h e in t e r i o r GENERAL MANA G E M ENT PLAN /ENVIRON M ENTAL ASSESS M ENT General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment MONTEZUMA CASTLE NATIONAL MONUMENT AND TUZIGOOT NATIONAL MONUMENT Yavapai County, Arizona January 2010 As the responsible agency, the National Park Service prepared this general management plan to establish the direction of management of Montezuma Castle National Monument and Tu- zigoot National Monument for the next 15 to 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility at Saguaro National Park NPS/A
    National Park Service Sonoran Desert Network U.S. Department of the Interior Air Quality Monitoring Brief Intermountain Region Inventory & Monitoring Program 2010 Visibility at Saguaro National Park NPS/A. WONDRAK BIEL Importance Both the Clean Air Act and the National Park Service (NPS) Organic Act protect air resources in national parks. Saguaro National Park is designated as a Class I area, receiving the highest protection under the Clean Air Act. Understanding changes in air quality can aid in interpreting changes in oth- er monitored vital signs and support evaluation of compli- ance with legislative and reporting requirements. At Sagua- ro NP, the Sonoran Desert Network has identifi ed ozone and visibility as high-priority vital signs for monitoring. Long-term Monitoring For Saguaro National Park, the Sonoran Desert Network (SODN) acquires, analyzes, and reports on air quality data from the web-based program archives of the National Park Airshed, Saguaro National Park. Service–Air Resources Division (NPS-ARD) Gaseous Pollut- ant Monitoring Program (ozone) and the Interagency Moni- are those resources that are potentially sensitive to air pollu- toring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) Pro- tion, and include vegetation, wildlife, water quality, soils, and gram (visibility). visibility. At present, visibility has been identifi ed as the most sensitive AQRV in the park; other AQRVs may also be sensi- Because the NPS-ARD has determined that particulate (vis- tive, but have not been suffi ciently studied. Although visibility ibility) monitors within 100 km (60 miles) may be reasonably in the park is still superior to that in many parts of the country, considered representative of a park’s air quality, the IMPROVE it is often impaired by light-scattering pollutants (haze).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Parks & Facilities Swimming Pools
    Marana & Oro Valley GUIDE TO PARKS & FACILITIES SWIMMING POOLS HIKING & TRAILS 1 San Lucas Community Park 16 Honey Bee Canyon Park Marana’s community pool is located at Ora Mae Harn District Park, 13251 OUTDOOR 14040 N. Adonis Rd. 13880 N. Rancho Vistoso Blvd. N. Lon Adams Road. It has long been a favorite way for area residents and Ramadas, ball fields, dog park, volleyball court, Hiking trails, ramadas, restrooms visitors to cool down during the hot summer months. In operation May playground, basketball court, restrooms, shared through September, the pool is open for any and all seeking a great way use path, fitness stations 17 Big Wash Linear Park to relax near the water in a beautiful park setting. A splash pad at Marana Accessible from Oro Valley Marketplace (Tangerine Recreation Heritage River Park, 12205 N. Tangerine Farms Road, features an agrarian WILD BURRO TRAIL Ora Mae Harn District Park 2 Rd. & Oracle Rd.) and from Steam Pump Village theme water features. There is also a splash pad at Crossroads at Silverbell 13250 N. Lon Adams Rd. (Oracle Rd., north of First Ave.) MARANA HERITAGE RIVER PARK brochure & map District Park, 7548 N. Silverbell Road. Hit the trails in Marana with year-round hiking. For stunning views of mountains, plants and wildlife, visit the Ball fields, ramadas, grills, tennis courts, Shared use path, great for walking, running and cycling vast trail network in the Tortolita Mountains, home to the Dove Mountain community and its Ritz-Carlton resort. pickleball courts, basketball courts, swimming The Oro Valley Aquatic Center is located within James D.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Saguaro Cactus Monitoring in Saguaro National Park, 1939–2007
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A History of Saguaro Cactus Monitoring in Saguaro National Park, 1939–2007 Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR—2009/093 ON THE COVERS Front: Saguaro cacti, Tucson Mountain District, Saguaro National Park. NPS/E. Ahnmark. Inside Back: Saguaro cacti, Saguaro National Park. NPS photo. A History of Saguaro Cactus Monitoring in Saguaro National Park, 1939–2007 Natural Resource Report NPS/SODN/NRR—2009/093 Authors Eric B. Ahnmark Don E. Swann Saguaro National Park 3693 South Old Spanish Trail Tucson, Arizona 85730-5601 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Sonoran Desert Network 7660 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 303 Tucson, Arizona 85710 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado ii National Park Service The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to oth- ers in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accu- rate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; “how to” resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona
    Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona Eric Menasco NPS Terry Reiners Arizona is the astrotourism capital of the United States. Its diverse landscape—from the Grand Canyon and ponderosa forests in the north to the Sonoran Desert and “sky islands” in the south—is home to more certified Dark Sky Places than any other U.S. state. In fact, no country outside the U.S. can rival Arizona’s 16 dark-sky communities and parks. Arizona helped birth the dark-sky preservation movement when, in 2001, the International Dark Sky Association (IDA) designated Flagstaff as the world’s very first Dark Sky Place for the city’s commitment to protecting its stargazing- friendly night skies. Since then, six other Arizona communities—Sedona, Big Park, Camp Verde, Thunder Mountain Pootseev Nightsky and Fountain Hills—have earned Dark Sky status from the IDA. Arizona also boasts nine Dark Sky Parks, defined by the IDA as lands with “exceptional quality of starry nights and a nocturnal environment that is specifically protected for its scientific, natural, educational, cultural heritage, and/or public enjoyment.” The most famous of these is Grand Canyon National Park, where remarkably beautiful night skies lend draw-dropping credence to the Park Service’s reminder that “half the park is after dark Of the 16 Certified IDA International Dark Sky Communities in the US, 6 are in Arizona. These include: • Big Park/Village of Oak Creek, Arizona • Camp Verde, Arizona • Flagstaff, Arizona • Fountain Hills, Arizona • Sedona, Arizona • Thunder Mountain Pootsee Nightsky- Kaibab Paiute Reservation, Arizona Arizona Office of Tourism—Dark Skies Page 1 Facebook: @arizonatravel Instagram: @visit_arizona Twitter: @ArizonaTourism #VisitArizona Arizona is also home to 10 Certified IDA Dark Sky Parks, including: Northern Arizona: Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument Offering multiple hiking trails around this former volcanic cinder cone, visitors can join rangers on tours to learn about geology, wildlife, and lava flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona, Road Trips Are As Much About the Journey As They Are the Destination
    Travel options that enable social distancing are more popular than ever. We’ve designated 2021 as the Year of the Road Trip so those who are ready to travel can start planning. In Arizona, road trips are as much about the journey as they are the destination. No matter where you go, you’re sure to spy sprawling expanses of nature and stunning panoramic views. We’re looking forward to sharing great itineraries that cover the whole state. From small-town streets to the unique landscapes of our parks, these road trips are designed with Grand Canyon National Park socially-distanced fun in mind. For visitor guidance due to COVID19 such as mask-wearing, a list of tourism-related re- openings or closures, and a link to public health guidelines, click here: https://www.visitarizona. com/covid-19/. Some attractions are open year-round and some are open seasonally or move to seasonal hours. To ensure the places you want to see are open on your travel dates, please check their website for hours of operation. Prickly Pear Cactus ARIZONA RESOURCES We provide complete travel information about destinations in Arizona. We offer our official state traveler’s guide, maps, images, familiarization trip assistance, itinerary suggestions and planning assistance along with lists of tour guides plus connections to ARIZONA lodging properties and other information at traveltrade.visitarizona.com Horseshoe Bend ARIZONA OFFICE OF TOURISM 100 N. 7th Ave., Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85007 | www.visitarizona.com Jessica Mitchell, Senior Travel Industry Marketing Manager | T: 602-364-4157 | E: [email protected] TRANSPORTATION From east to west both Interstate 40 and Interstate 10 cross the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona – May/June 2017 Sjef Öllers
    Arizona – May/June 2017 Sjef Öllers Our first holiday in the USA was a relaxed trip with about equal time spent on mammalwatching, birding and hiking, but often all three could be combined. Mammal highlights included White-nosed Coati, Hooded Skunk, Striped Skunk, American Badger and unfortunately brief views of Black-footed Ferret. There were many birding highlights but I was particularly pleased with sightings of Montezuma Quail, Scaled Quail, Red-faced Warbler, Elegant Trogon, Greater Roadrunner, Elf Owl, Spotted Owl, Dusky Grouse and Californian Condor. American Badger Introduction Arizona seemed to offer a good introduction to both the avian and mammalian delights of North America. Our initial plan was to do a comprehensive two-week visit of southeast Arizona, but after some back and forth we decided to include a visit to the Grand Canyon, also because this allowed a visit to Seligman for Badger and Black-footed Ferret and Vermillion Cliffs for Californian Condor. Overall, the schedule worked out pretty well, even if the second part included a lot more driving, although most of the driving was through pleasant or even superb scenery. I was already a little skeptical of including Sedona before the trip, and while I don’t regret having visited the Sedona area, from a mammal and birding perspective it is a destination that could be excluded. Another night in Seligman and more hiking/birding around Flagstaff would probably have been more productive. 1 Timing and Weather By late May/early June the northbound migratory species have largely left southeast Arizona so you mainly get to see the resident birds and summer visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Funds Needed for Memorial
    Press Coverage May 2020 ARIZONA: McDowell Mountain working with that type of The best campsite Regional Park in Maricopa equipment. And again, if it’s windy in every state County out, just wait and do the work DARCY SCHILD, MATTHEW another day.” WILSON MAY 29, 2020, 6:42 AM The fire started in the area of 24th Street and Desert Hills, 4 miles • Camping is a popular way north of Cave Creek Regional to relax, unplug, and have Park, around 1 p.m. May 17. an adventure while maintaining social According to Davila, four or five distancing guidelines. homes, including a vacant one, were • From the Redwood Forest evacuated early on and provided of California to Florida’s structure protection. vibrant natural springs, Sue Stokes/ShutterstockMcDowell Mountain Regional Park. nature enthusiasts can Aircraft were ordered to assist ground crews with the fire, which explore a variety of “Easy to find a private space to Davila said moved around the campsites in the US. camp. Backside of McDowells are homes and “creeped back down a • Insider compiled a list not as popular so if you are like me hill into open space.” Around 8 p.m., of top-ranked campsites in you will love quiet. I have seen all however, high wind gusts caused it every state based on ratings kinds of wildlife from Gila monster to pick back up and head toward from Yelp and (no monster ) to deer,” wrote Yelp Cahava Springs. TripAdvisor. user Mer B, who gave McDowell Mountain Regional Park and its That night, and into the next If baseball is America’s pastime, stunning desert landscape five stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Soil Microbial Communities Across an Urbanization Gradient: a Local-Scale Temporal Study in the Arid Southwestern USA
    microorganisms Article Changes in Soil Microbial Communities across an Urbanization Gradient: A Local-Scale Temporal Study in the Arid Southwestern USA Yongjian Chen * , Adalee Martinez, Sydney Cleavenger, Julia Rudolph and Albert Barberán Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (A.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Urban development is one of the leading causes of biodiversity change. Understanding how soil microorganisms respond to urbanization is particularly important because they are crucial for the provisioning of ecosystem functions and services. Here, we collected monthly soil samples over one year across three locations representing an urbanization gradient (low-moderate-high) in the arid Southwestern USA, and we characterized their microbial communities using marker gene sequencing. Our results showed that microbial richness and community composition exhibited non- significant changes over time regardless of the location. Soil fungal richness was lower in moderately and highly urbanized locations, but soil bacterial/archaeal richness was not significantly different among locations. Both bacteria/archaea and fungi exhibited significant differences in community composition across locations. After inferring potential functional groups, soils in the highly urbanized Citation: Chen, Y.; Martinez, A.; location had lower proportions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil saprotrophic fungi but had Cleavenger, S.; Rudolph, J.; Barberán, higher proportions of bacterial taxa involved in aromatic compound degradation, human pathogens, A. Changes in Soil Microbial and intracellular parasites. Furthermore, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were more abundant in the Communities across an Urbanization highly urbanized location, but ammonia-oxidizing archaea were more abundant in lowly and moder- Gradient: A Local-Scale Temporal ately urbanized locations.
    [Show full text]