Playing Hide and Seek with Poorly Tasting Paediatric Medicines: Do Not Forget the Excipients☆

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Playing Hide and Seek with Poorly Tasting Paediatric Medicines: Do Not Forget the Excipients☆ ADR-12586; No of Pages 20 Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/addr Playing hide and seek with poorly tasting paediatric medicines: Do not forget the excipients☆ Jennifer Walsh a,⁎,AnneCramb,KatharinaWoertzc, Joerg Breitkreutz c, Gesine Winzenburg d, Roy Turner d, Catherine Tuleu e, On behalf of the European Formulation Initiative (EuPFI) a Jenny Walsh Consulting Ltd, BioCity Nottingham, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham NG1 1GF, United Kingdom b Drug Product Development, Pfizer Ltd, Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ, United Kingdom c Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Building 26.22, Universitaetsstrasse 1,40225 Duesseldorf, Germany d Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland e Centre for Paediatric Pharmacy Research, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom article info abstract Available online xxxx The development of paediatric medicines can be challenging since this is a diverse patient population with specific needs. For example, the toxicity of excipients may differ in children compared to adults and children Keywords: have different taste preferences. Acceptable palatability of oral paediatric medicinal products is of great Paediatric importance to facilitate patient adherence. This has been recognised by regulatory authorities and so is becoming Taste masking a key aspect of paediatric pharmaceutical development studies. Many active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) Formulation have aversive taste characteristics and so it is necessary to utilise taste masking techniques to improve the Palatability palatability of paediatric oral formulations. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of different Dosage form Excipient approaches to taste masking APIs in paediatric oral dosage forms, with a focus on the tolerability of excipients used. In addition, where possible, the provision of examples of some marketed products is made. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction............................................................... 0 2. Bitter blockers and taste modifiers..................................................... 0 2.1. Bitterreceptorantagonists..................................................... 0 2.2. Tastetransductioncascadeblockers................................................. 0 2.3. Gapsincurrentknowledgeandtechnologylimitations........................................ 0 3. Sweeteners and flavouringsystems.................................................... 0 3.1. Sweeteners............................................................ 0 3.2. Flavours............................................................. 0 3.3. Safety and toxicity of sweeteners and flavouringagents........................................ 0 4. ModificationofAPIsolubility....................................................... 0 4.1. KeepingtheAPIunionised..................................................... 0 4.2. Alternativesolidform....................................................... 0 4.3. ChallengestoconsiderformodifyinganAPI............................................. 0 5. Create a ‘molecular’ barrieraroundtheAPIbycomplexation......................................... 0 5.1. Ion-exchangeresins........................................................ 0 5.1.1. Safetyandtoxicityofpharmaceuticalgradeionexchangeresins................................ 0 5.1.2. Formulationssuitableforthepaediatricpopulation...................................... 0 5.2. Cyclodextrins........................................................... 0 5.2.1. Oralsafetyandtoxicityofcyclodextrins........................................... 0 5.2.2. Formulationscontainingcyclodextrinsfortastemasking................................... 0 ☆ This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on"Paediatric drug delivery". ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 7757 948052. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J. Walsh), anne.cram@pfizer.com (A. Cram), [email protected] (J. Breitkreutz), [email protected] (G. Winzenburg), [email protected] (R. Turner), [email protected] (C. Tuleu). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.02.012 0169-409X/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Please cite this article as: J. Walsh, et al., Playing hide and seek with poorly tasting paediatric medicines: Do not forget the excipients, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.02.012 2 J. Walsh et al. / Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews xxx (2014) xxx–xxx 6. Apply a physical ‘barrier’ ontheAPIorthedosageform........................................... 0 6.1. Polymer film-coating........................................................ 0 6.1.1. Safetyandtoxicityofcoatingmaterials........................................... 0 6.1.2. Formulationssuitableforthepaediatricpopulation...................................... 0 6.2. Lipidicbarriersystem....................................................... 0 6.2.1. Commonlyusedlipidicexcipientsfortastemasking..................................... 0 6.2.2. Formulationscontaininglipidicexcipientsfortastemasking.................................. 0 7. Summaryandconclusions......................................................... 0 References.................................................................. 0 1. Introduction Acceptability is driven by the characteristics of the user (age, ability, disease type and state) and by the characteristics of a medicinal product Acceptable palatability is paramount for paediatric formulations. such as: A survey of over 800 paediatricians showed that unpleasant taste of • palatability medication is a key barrier to compliance for 90.8% of patients with • swallowability (volume/size and shape, integrity of dosage form, acute illness and 83.9% of patients with chronic illness [1].Compliance e.g. functional coating) rates in children have been found to range from 11 to 93%, with major • complexity of manipulation if required factors attributed to formulation and palatability [2].Palatabilityis • the required dose e.g. the dosing volume, number of tablets etc. largely dictated by taste and this is a concern as a significant number • the required dosing frequency and duration treatment of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) on the market and in devel- • the selected administration device opment have aversive taste. This is not considered to be a key issue • the primary and secondary container closure system when developing oral dose forms for adults who can swallow tablets • the actual mode of administration. since such products can be film or sugar-coated, thereby masking the taste of the API. In the paediatric population the issue is accentuated Palatability is one of the main elements of the patient acceptance of a by dysphagia, leading to an increased use of oral dosage forms such as medicinal product. It is defined as the overall appreciation of an (often liquids, (oro-) dispersible and chewable tablets where taste masking oral) medicine by organoleptic properties such as smell, taste, aftertaste becomes a greater challenge. In addition, differences in taste perception, and texture (i.e. mouthfeel), and possibly also vision and sound. It is de- sensitivity and tolerance between adults and children make taste termined by the characteristics of the components (API and excipients) assessment and development of palatable paediatric medications more and the way the API is formulated. Palatability is relevant for other complex. routes of administration e.g. buccal, nasal, inhalation. Thus not only The paediatric population represents a diverse group of patients, should a medicinal product not taste and smell (especially the aroma exhibiting differences in biological and physiological attributes com- on first opening and during consumption) unpleasant, it should have pared to adults. Indeed, children are not merely miniature adults because acceptable mouthfeel (viscosity, grittiness) and appearance (visual as- sensory systems mature postnatally and their responses to certain tastes pect, size and shape, packaging). Thus palatability and indeed accept- differ markedly from adults. Amongst these differences are heightened ability are key considerations when defining the target product profile. preferences for sweet-tasting and greater rejection of bitter-tasting The importance of acceptable palatability has been recognised by foods [3]. In addition, APIs and excipients are metabolized differently regulatory authorities, including the European Medicines Evaluation by children of different ages compared to adults [4]. Therefore the use Agency (EMA) [5]. The French regulatory authorities (Afssaps) launched of certain excipients may not be appropriate or the levels will be restrict- a study designed to determine the acceptability of oral liquid originator ed, which further complicates excipient selection. and generic antibiotics prescribed to ambulatory children [6]. The dis- Indeed, when designing an age-appropriate paediatric medicinal parity in the acceptability of the different antibiotics prescribed, even product, the excipients used should be selected using a benefitriskap- for the same drug has been confirmed by Wollner et al. [7]. proach, encompassing all aspects of the proposed excipients in parallel, Moreover within the requirements of the European Union's Paediat- including: ric
Recommended publications
  • Directory of Companies A
    65 Directory of Companies A An alphabetical list of pharmaceutical companies, as well as manufacturers and suppliers of products and services for Medicinal Chemistry in Europe 3B PHARMACEUTICALS GMBH Magnusstraße 11 12489 BERLIN DE 3M BELGIUM Canadastraat 11, Haven 1005 2070 ZWIJNDRECHT BE 3V-LSI Rubicondreef 18 3561 JC UTRECHT NL of Companies 4SC AG Am Klopferspitz 19a 82152 MARTINSRIED DE A & D INSTRUMENTS LTD Abingdon Science Park OX14 3YX ABINGDON GB ABBVIE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG Knollstrasse 67061 LUDWIGSHAFEN DE Directory ABCR GMBH Im Schlehert 10 76187 Karlsruhe, GERMANY Contact person: Dr. Ute Kiso Tel: +49 721 95061-0 - [email protected] www.abcr.de Gute Chemie. Welcome to abcr. With abcr, you have access to over 260,000 products from the organic, organometallic and inorganic specialty chemicals area. These can be conveniently ordered via our webshop www.abcr.de > Catalogue & Bulk business from grams to tons > Scale up & Commercial manufacturing from our own facility > Sourcing & Logistic management worldwide > Feasibility studies & Synthesis at the laboratory scale > Custom syntheses & Contract Manufacturing ABSORPTION SYSTEMS 440 Creamery Way Suite 300 PA 19341 EXTON US AC IMMUNE SA EPFL Innovation Park Building B 1015 LAUSANNE FR ACCELA CHEMBIO 9823 Pacific Heights Blvd # F 92121 SAN DIEGO US ACRAF S.P.A. Piazzale della Stazione 40 S. PALOMBA - POMEZIA IT ACROS ORGANICS Janssen Pharmaceuticalaan 3a 2440 GEEL BE ACS Journal of Medicinal Chemistry & ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters Contact person: Janice E. Silverman, Acquisitions Editor Tel: +1 202-577-5975 [email protected] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry – pubs.acs.org/jmc ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters – pubs.acs.org/acsmedchemlett In 2017 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is celebrating 60 years of publishing the field’s best peer-reviewed research.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1: Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 Score of NLP Vs. ICD for Identification of Symptoms for (A) Biome Developm
    Table S1: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score of NLP vs. ICD for identification of symptoms for (A) BioMe development cohort; (B) BioMe validation cohort; (C) MIMIC-III; (D) 1 year of notes from patients in BioMe calculated using manual chart review. A) Fatigue Nausea and/or vomiting Anxiety Depression NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.99 (0.93- 0.59 (0.43- <0.00 0.25 (0.12- <0.00 <0.00 0.54 (0.33- Sensitivity 0.99 (0.9 – 1) 0.98 (0.88 -1) 0.3 (0.15-0.5) 0.85 (0.65-96) 0.02 1) 0.73) 1 0.42) 1 1 0.73) 0.57 (0.29- 0.9 (0.68- Specificity 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.75 (0.19-1) 0.68 0.97 (0.77-1) 0.03 0.98 (0.83-1) 0.22 0.81 (0.53-0.9) 0.96 (0.79-1) 0.06 0.82) 0.99) 0.99 (0.92- 0.86 (0.71- 0.94 (0.79- 0.79 (0.59- PPV 0.96 (0.82-1) 0.3 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.02 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.16 0.93 (0.68-1) 0.12 1) 0.95) 0.99) 0.92) 0.13 (0.03- <0.00 0.49 (0.33- <0.00 0.66 (0.48- NPV 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.007 0.94 (0.63-1) 0.34 (0.2-0.51) 0.97 (0.81-1) 0.86 (0.6-0.95) 0.04 0.35) 1 0.65) 1 0.81) <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.99 0.83 0.88 0.57 0.95 0.63 0.82 0.79 0.002 1 1 1 Itching Cramp Pain NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.98 (0.86- 0.24 (0.09- <0.00 0.09 (0.01- <0.00 0.52 (0.37- <0.00 Sensitivity 0.98 (0.85-1) 0.99 (0.93-1) 1) 0.45) 1 0.29) 1 0.66) 1 0.89 (0.72- 0.5 (0.37- Specificity 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.68 0.98 (0.88-1) 0.18 0.5 (0-1) 1 0.98) 0.66) 0.88 (0.69- PPV 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.8 (0.54-1) 0.32 0.8 (0.16-1) 0.22 0.99 (0.93-1) 0.98 (0.87-1) NA* 0.97) 0.98 (0.85- 0.57 (0.41- <0.00 0.58 (0.43- <0.00 NPV 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.5 (0-1) 0.02 (0-0.08) NA* 1) 0.72) 1 0.72) 1 <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.97 0.56 0.91 0.28 0.99 0.68 1 1 1 *Denotes 95% confidence intervals and P values that could not be calculated due to insufficient cells in 2x2 tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Page
    Statement of Development Principles: Regeneration Of Boots Campus, Beeston, Nottingham June 2007 STATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES: REGENERATION OF BOOTS CAMPUS, BEESTON, NOTTINGHAM (June 2007) Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................2 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................. 2 POLICY CONTEXT................................................................................................................ 3 2. Development Principles ............................................................................4 THE VISION........................................................................................................................... 4 KEY DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................... 4 3. Key Issues ..................................................................................................7 HIGHWAYS AND ACCESS ................................................................................................... 7 BALANCE OF USES ............................................................................................................. 7 LISTED BUILDINGS .............................................................................................................. 9 ENVIRONMENT.....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Pharma Group
    This document comprises a prospectus (the “Prospectus”) relating to Acacia Pharma Group plc (the “Company” or “Acacia Pharma”) prepared in accordance with the prospectus regulation rules (the “Prospectus Regulation Rules”) of the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) made pursuant to section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (“FSMA”). This Prospectus has been approved by the FCA as the competent authority under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (the “Prospectus Regulation”) and has been filed with and made available to the public in accordance with Rule 3.2 of the Prospectus Regulation Rules. The FCA only approves this Prospectus as meeting the standards of completeness, comprehensibility and consistency imposed by the Prospectus Regulation. Such approval should not be considered as an endorsement of the Company or of the quality of the Ordinary Shares that are the subject of this Prospectus. Investors should make their own assessment as to the suitability of investing in the Ordinary Shares. In addition, this Prospectus has been drawn up as a simplified prospectus in accordance with Article 14 of the Prospectus Regulation. The Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority (“Belgian FSMA”) was notified of the passporting of this Prospectus in accordance with Article 25 of the Prospectus Regulation. The Company and the Directors, whose names appear on page 39 of this document, accept responsibility for the information contained in this document. To the best of the knowledge of the Company and the Directors, the information contained in this document is in accordance with the facts and this document makes no omission likely to affect its import.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 1995 EFFECTS OF CEREBRAL METABOLIC ENHANCERS ON BRAIN FUNCTION IN RODENTS KOICHIRO TAKAHASHI,l MINORU YAMAMOTO,’ MASANORI SUZUKI,’ YUKIKO OZAWA,’ TAKASHI YAMAGUCHI,l HIROFUMI ANDOH, AND KOUICHI ISHIKAWA2 ‘Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Research Laboratory, Yamunouchi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and ‘Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan AFWI’RACT The effects of cerebral metabolic enhancers (indeloxazine, bi- femelane, idebenone, and nicergoline) on reserpine-induced hypother- mia, the immobility period in forced swimming tests, and passive avoidance learning behavior were compared with the effects of ami- triptyline in rodents. Indeloxazine, bifemelane, and amitriptyline antagonized hypothermia in mice given reserpine. Indeloxaxine and amitriptyline decreased the immobility period in mice in the forced swimming test in a dose-dependent manner. The latency of step- through in the passive avoidance test in rats was prolonged by ad- ministration of indeloxazine but shortened by administration of amitriptyline. Neither idebenone nor nicergoline displayed any phar- macologic action in these tests. The results suggest that indeloxaxine possesses an antidepressant activity similar to that of amitriptyline but differs from amitriptyline in its anticholinergic properties and its ability to ameliorate impaired brain function such as that of learning behavior. In addition, indeloxazine exhibited broader effects on brain functions than either bifemelane, idebenone, or nicergoline. INTRODUCTION Cerebral metabolic enhancers (drugs that enhance energy metabolism) including brain glucose and ATP levels such as indeloxazine,1*2 bi- femelane, 3*4idebenone?6 and nicergoline,7>8 are currently used for the treatment of patients with various psychiatric symptoms. These symptoms include reduced spontaneity and emotional disturbance in patients with cerebral vascular disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromanone-A Prerogative Therapeutic Scaffold: an Overview
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05858-3 REVIEW-CHEMISTRY Chromanone‑A Prerogative Therapeutic Scafold: An Overview Sonia Kamboj1,2 · Randhir Singh1 Received: 28 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 © King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2021 Abstract Chromanone or Chroman-4-one is the most important and interesting heterobicyclic compound and acts as a building block in medicinal chemistry for isolation, designing and synthesis of novel lead compounds. Structurally, absence of a double bond in chromanone between C-2 and C-3 shows a minor diference from chromone but exhibits signifcant variations in biological activities. In the present review, various studies published on synthesis, pharmacological evaluation on chroman- 4-one analogues are addressed to signify the importance of chromanone as a versatile scafold exhibiting a wide range of pharmacological activities. But, due to poor yield in the case of chemical synthesis and expensive isolation procedure from natural compounds, more studies are required to provide the most efective and cost-efective methods to synthesize novel chromanone analogs to give leads to chemistry community. Considering the versatility of chromanone, this review is designed to impart comprehensive, critical and authoritative information about chromanone template in drug designing and development. Keywords Chroman-4-one · Chromone · Pharmacological activity · Synthesis · Analogues 1 Introduction dihydropyran (ring B) which relates to chromane, chromene, chromone and chromenone, but the absence of C2-C3 dou- Chroman-4-one is one of the most important heterobicyclic ble bond of chroman-4-one skeleton makes a minor difer- moieties existing in natural compounds as polyphenols and ence (Table 1) from chromone and associated with diverse as synthetic compounds like Taxifolin, also known as chro- biological activities [1].
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine
    A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report 01 November 2016 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Contents Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines ....................................................................................1 1. Introduction to the Midlands Engine SIA...........................................................................4 2. SIA ‘hypotheses’ and ‘framework’ ...................................................................................10 3. Regional science and innovation assets and excellence..............................................19 4. Innovation strengths and our growth priorities..............................................................30 5. Market and technology drivers of change.......................................................................53 6. Innovation networks and behaviours ..............................................................................59 7. Next Steps – unlocking our productivity potential.........................................................67 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines 1. In Autumn 2015 the UK Government announced regional Science and Innovation Audits (SIAs) to catalyse
    [Show full text]
  • A Preclinical Evaluation of the Discriminative And
    NP5101_proof ■ 12 June 2013 ■ 1/11 Neuropharmacology xxx (2013) 1e11 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Neuropharmacology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuropharm 1 56 2 A preclinical evaluation of the discriminative and reinforcing 57 3 58 4 properties of lisdexamfetamine in comparison to D-amfetamine, 59 5 fi 60 6 methylphenidate and moda nil 61 7 62 a,* a a a b 8 Q5 David J. Heal , Niki W. Buckley , Jane Gosden , Nigel Slater , Charles P. France , 63 9 David Hackett c 64 10 65 a 11 RenaSci Ltd, BioCity Nottingham, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham NG1 1GF, UK 66 b University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA 12 c Shire Pharmaceutical Development Ltd, Hampshire International Business Park, Chineham, Basingstoke RG24 8EP, Hampshire, UK 67 13 68 14 69 15 article info abstract 70 16 71 17 Article history: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, which consists of L-lysine covalently bound to D-amfetamine, is the first 72 18 Received 12 December 2012 prodrug for treating ADHD. Its metabolic conversion to yield D-amfetamine by rate-limited, enzymatic 73 19 Received in revised form hydrolysis is unusual because it is performed by peptidases associated with red blood cells. Other 74 3 April 2013 20 stimulants shown to be effective in managing ADHD include D-amfetamine, methylphenidate and 75 Accepted 13 May 2013 21 modafinil. All have the potential for misuse or recreational abuse. The discriminative and reinforcing 76 effects of these compounds were determined in rats using a 2-choice, D-amfetamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)- 77 22 Keywords: cued drug-discrimination test, and by substitution for intravenous cocaine in self-administration.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/001643 Al 7 January 2016 (07.01.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: GILL JENNINGS & EVERY LLP et al; The A61P 25/28 (2006.01) A61K 31/194 (2006.01) Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2ES A61P 25/16 (2006.01) A61K 31/205 (2006.01) (GB). A23L 1/30 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (21) International Application Number: kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, PCT/GB20 15/05 1898 AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (22) International Filing Date: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, 29 June 2015 (29.06.2015) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (25) Filing Language: English KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (26) Publication Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (30) Priority Data: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 141 1570.3 30 June 2014 (30.06.2014) GB TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 1412414.3 11 July 2014 ( 11.07.2014) GB (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: MITOCHONDRIAL SUBSTRATE INVEN¬ kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, TION LIMITED [GB/GB]; 39 Glasslyn Road, London GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, N8 8RJ (GB).
    [Show full text]
  • BIO-SCIENCE FACILITY, LOWER PARLIAMENT STREET, NOTTINGHAM Nottingham City Council Lease the OPPORTUNITY
    Significant Capital Allowance Investment Opportunity BIO-SCIENCE FACILITY, LOWER PARLIAMENT STREET, NOTTINGHAM Nottingham City Council Lease THE OPPORTUNITY Unique opportunity to acquire a new bio-science incubator facility let on a long lease to a major city council with significant capital allowances providing an attractive post tax return. Prominently located at Lower Parliament Street, Nottingham There are estimated £9,750,000 of available capital allowances to a adjacent to the existing Bio-City buildings within Nottingham’s purchaser which at a higher tax rate of 45% are worth £4,387,500 creative quarter. over a 5 year period. 150 years long-leasehold interest at a peppercorn rent from Nottingham City Council is to provide a loan to the purchaser of Nottingham City Council. £11,011,200 for a 5 years period at a fixed interest rate of 4.50% which equates to £495,484 interest per annum. No amortisation required during this period. Construction commenced in August 2015 on the new Biocity Science building over ground and 4 upper floors providing state of the art laboratory and office accommodation and extending to 52,475 sq ft Purchaser equity requirement of £6,748,800 which after interest NIA. Willmott Dixon is the appointed contractor. charges provides a net annual pre tax yield of 3.18%. To be let to Nottingham City Council for 30 years from completion of this transaction on a full repairing and insuring lease at an initial rent of Post tax annual yields are Year 1 - 7.54%, Year 2 - 6.86%, Year 3 - £714,000 per annum equating to £13.61 per sq ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]