Annotated Checklist of the Macroscopic Troglobites of Virginia with Notes on Their Geographic Ilistributioni by JOHN R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
g47() Annotated Checklist of the Macroscopic Troglobites of Virginia With Notes on Their Geographic Ilistributioni by JOHN R. HOLSINGER AusritAc-r—Extensive field work in recent years has facilitated the publication of a checklist of Virginia's troglobitic species. A large number of pertinent range extensions remain to be worked out, however, and in addition, several new species probably remain to be discovered. Forty-one troglobitic species are presently recognized from Virginia, including planarians (2), amphipods (4), isopods (3), millipeds (9), collembolans (4), beetles (10), pseudoscorpions (4), and spiders (5). At least fifteen more species are known but have yet to be described in the literature. The isolation of certain species in caves and genetic changes within cave- dwelling animal populations are believed to be causative factors in troglobitic speciation. Many present-day cave species have probably evolved from surface forms already partially adapted for a subterranean existence. Certain cavernic- olous groups like the anophthalmid beetles, pseudotremid millipeds, and cave pseudoscorpions are restricted to very small geographic areas and in some cases, only one cave system. Other cavernicolous groups like linyphiid spiders and various species of collembola are not restricted to isolated areas, but their range extends over a wide geographic region. With the exception of spiders and col- lembolans, aquatic troglobites seem to be more widely dispersed than terrestrial troglobites. The limestone region of Virginia which was remote from Pleistocene glaciation contains more than three times as many troglobitic species as the limestone area in Pennsylvania which was close to Pleistocene glaciation. The first attempt to present a systematic Biological Survey of Virginia Caves has pro- checklist of all the known macroscopic trog- vided considerable information on range ex- lobites of the United States was by Nicholas tension relative to many of the little-known (1960a). Previous to this, Nicholas had pub- troglobitic species of this state. Unfortunate- lished preliminary lists of troglobites for the ly, most of the undescribed material obtained states of Missouri (1960b) and Pennsylvania during this period remains to be worked out (1960c). One year later, Warren (1961) pub- and could not be included in the formal list. lished a checklist of the obligative cavernic- In addition to the concentrated collecting oles of Florida. Recently, the need was felt efforts mentioned above, earlier workers had for a similar treatment of this subject in already added appreciably to the knowledge Virginia, and the author began to compile of Virginia cave fauna prior to 1950. data for such a presentation. The extensive Both Nicholas (1960a) and Warren (1961) obligative cavernicole in ref- collecting carried on by T. C. Barr, Jr. in used the term 1958 and more recently by members of the erence to those animals which are more or less completely adapted to the hypogean en- vironment, thus permanent cave dwellers. 1Contribution Number Eight from the Bio- logical Survey of Virginia Caves, a research proj- Warren considered the two terms obligative ect of the National Speleological Society. cavernicole and troglobite to be synonymous. BULLETIN VOLUME 25, PART 1, JANUARY, 1963 23 COUNTIES DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1. Frederick 19. Bland A. Shenandoah (upper Potomac) 2. Clark 20. Tazewell B. James 3. Warren 21. Smyth C. Roanoke 4. Shenandoah 22. Washington D. New 5. It& 23. Russell E. Clinch, Holston, and 6. Rockingham 24. Wise Powell (upper Tennessee) 7. Augusta 25. Scott 8. Highland 26. Lee 9. Bath 10. Rockbridge A 11. Alleghany 12. Botetourt 13. Craig 14.Roanoke 15. Mantgomery 16. Giles 7 4( 1 17. Pulaski <c, 9 ,-• : 18. Wythe 4‘ ;' A 10 12 13 KENTUCKY 16 1 4 VIRGINIA s • • 2 19 t : 15 C ...... 0** . - , 17 ., • -: 24 " 1 2 3 4? ' 22 ' 25 s TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA Fig ure I Map of the caverniferous limestone areas in the Appalachian region of Virginia. Dots indicate boundaries of major drainage basins; arrows indicate general direction of flow in drainage basins. The author has adopted the term troglobite, edly complete their life cycles there. The oc- and finds the following definition conven- currence, however, of these same species in ient: members of a species which exist only epigean surroundings provided the necessary in the cavern environment and complete criterion for their exclusion. their life cycles in absolute darkness (trog- The greatest shortcoming to presenting a lobites are never found on the surface unless checklist at this time was the impossibility of they are washed out of a cave by flooding). including many of the recently acquired but Through modification and regressive evolu- as yet undescribed troglobites that are known tion these organisms usually possess char- to exist. In many instances, whole complexes acteristic features such as loss of sight (their remain to be studied and worked out. In eyes being rudimentary or lost), slender other cases further collecting is needed be- bodies, loss of toleration to such stimuli as fore definite ranges can be accurately plotted, light and heat, longer appendages, and some The author has personally collected at least or complete loss of integumentary pig- five and possibly six new forms which remain mentation. to be described. In addition, ten or more As would be expected, strict limitation other new forms, collected by other workers of species to this definition has lead to the in earlier times, are also in need of descrip- exclusion from the checklist of several caver- tion. Several groups need a modern review nicoles which, because of their almost com- 2Because of its reported existence in a grave, plete modification to subterranean life, might Pseudosinella argen tea Folsom might be an ex- otherwise have been included.2 Three ex- ception to this rule. The author, however, feels amples immediately come to mind: Nesticus that a grave (while possibly endogeic) could in pallidus Emerton, Tomocerus bidentatus Fol- most instances be regarded as possessing all of the factors that ordinarily constitute a hypogean som, and Phalangodes flavescens (Cope). All habitat. It might also be added that all other three forms, when found in caves, undoubt- records for this species are strictly from caves. 24 THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY before meaningful names and data can be Rock House and Seven Springs Caves, Rus- published. The present situation, while re- sell County; and Parsons Cave, Wise County. gretable, is not surprising considering the H. R. Steeves, III, (pers. comm.) now has a tedious task and enormous amount of time description of this isopod in press. Several required to complete some of these necessary undetermined and possibly new species of ter- jobs. In view of this, the author feels justi- restrial isopods (fam. Trichoniscidae) have fied at this time to mention some of the un- been collected from Lowmoor Quarry Cave, described forms and give the reader an idea Alleghany County and Bucks Hill Cave, of their present status. Rockbridge County. Blind, unpigmented snails (fam. Bithy- Many additional specimens of troglobitic niidae) have been obtained from five cave amphipods, some of which may be new streams and three springs in Virginia. Seven forms, have been discovered since the in- of these forms have been tentatively assigned formative work of Hubricht (1943). When to the genus Fontigens. The other one is an further work has been accomplished, new undescribed species of the genus Lartetia, a range extensions can undoubtedly be relict form collected only from travertine mapped. All amphipod material is at present pools in Skyline Caverns, near Front Royal, in the care of the author. Warren County. Fontigens is known from A great deal of important work on the the following localities: Witheros Cave, Bath troglobitic trechines (essentially of the genus County; Paint Bank Spring, Craig County; Pseudanophthalmus) has been accomplished Ogdens Cave and Ogdens Spring, Frederick in recent years by T. C. Barr, Jr. Many new County; Tawneys Cave, Giles County; species have been obtained in west central George Hinkin Spring, Shenandoah County; and southwestern Virginia, and a mono- and Skyline Caverns, Warren County. All graphic treatment on this interesting group specimens have been deposited with J. P. E. of cavernicoles is expected in the near Morrison, United States National Museum. future. As a result of work by Causey (1960) many Little has been reported regarding the of the problems regarding the taxonomy and range or habits of the troglobitic pesudo- geographic distribution of the zygonopid scorpions. Malcolm and Chamberlain (1961) millipeds have been clarified. Another prob- have recently described two new species from lem, similar to the one which once plagued caves in southwestern Virginia, but owing the zygonopids, remains to be resolved for to the secretive nature and comparative the genus Pseudotremia. Major problems rarity of these organisms, few specimens have concern the variation and speciation of this ever been obtained. To date, however, every group, especially in the southwestern portion cave (with one possible exception) in which of the state. In addition, a totally new spe- pseudoscorpions were collected have yielded cies of pseudotremid was recently obtained what will probably turn out to be discrete in Porters Cave, Bath County, and will be new species. These include Apochthonius described by N. B. Causey in the near future. sp. and Pseudozaona sp. from Cave Run Pit Two new species of isopods of completely Cave, Bath County; Mundochthonius sp. different families have been discovered since from Helsleys Cave, Shenandoah County; a 1958. One, a cirolonid, was collected from form similar to the European genus Pseudo- Madison Cave, Augusta County by T. C. blothrus from Maddens Cave, Shenandoah Barr, Jr. and possibly belongs to the other- County; and Kleptochthonius (Chamberlin- wise European genus, Sphaeromides. In 1960 ochthonius) sp. from Porters Cave, Bath the author Collected a new species of asellid County. isopod from three caves in southwestern Vir- Continued field work will doubtless*, add ginia.