DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Paleontological Society, Held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, December 31, 1917, and January 1 and 2, 1918

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Paleontological Society, Held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, December 31, 1917, and January 1 and 2, 1918 Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on April 10, 2015 BULLETIN Ot" TMfc GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l . 29 , p p . 119-166 M a r c h 3 1 , 19 18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY, HELD AT PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, DECEMBER 31, 1917, AND JANUARY 1 AND 2, 1918. R. S. Bassler, Secretary CONTENTS Page Session of Monday, December 31.......................................................................... 122 Report of the Council....................................................................................... 123 Secretary’s report........................................................................................ 123 Treasurer’s report....................................................................................... 124 Appointment of Auditing Committee............................................................ 125 Election of officers and members.................................................................. 125 Election of new members................................................................................ 126 Presentation of papers on paleontology and stratigraphy....................... 127 Paleozoic deposits and fossils on the Piedmont of Maryland and Virginia [abstract]; by R. S. Bassler.............................................. 127 Significance of the Sherburne bar in the Upper Devonic stratig­ raphy [abstract]; by Amadeus W. Grabau.................................... 127 Algal limestone on the Belcher Islands, Hudson Bay [abstract]; by E. S. Moore......................................................................................... 128 Symposium on problems in history of faunal and floral relationships in the Antillean-Isthmian region and their bearing on biologic rela­ tionships of North and South America................................................... 129 Relations between the Paleozoic floras of North and South Amer­ ica; by David White............................................................................ 129 Relations between the Mesozoic floras of North and South Amer­ ica; by F. H. Knowlton...................................................................... 129 Paleogeographic significance of the Cenozoic floras of equatorial America and the adJacent regions; by E. W. Berry. .. i.............. 129 Bearing of the distribution of the existing flora of Central Amer­ ica and the Antilles on former land connections; by William Trelease..;...............................................................................................129 Paleozoic history of Central America and the West Indies; by R. S. Bassler............................................................................................. 129 Presidential address by J. C. Merriam: An outline of progress in paleontologic research on the Pacific coast........................,.................. 129 Smoker to the Society...................................................................................... 130 X—Boll. Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. 29, 1917 (119) Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on April 10, 2015 120 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY Page Session of Tuesday, January 1.............................................................................. 130 Some observations on the osteology of Diplodocus; by William J. Holland..................................................................................................... 130 Critical study of fossil leaves from the Dakota sandstone [ab­ stract] ; by B. M. Gress........................................................................ 131 Observations on the skeleton of Moropus cooki in the American Museum [abstract] ; by Henry Fairfield Osborn.............................. 131 A long-Jawed mastodon skeleton from South Dakota and phylog- eny of the Proboscidea ; by Henry Fairfield Osborn......................... 133 Continuation of symposium............................................................................. 138 Mesozoic history of Central America and the West Indies; by T. W. Stanton.......................................................................................... 138 Cenozoic history of Central America and the West Indies; by T. W. Vaughan........................................................................................ 138 Relationships of the Mesozoic reptiles of North and South Amer­ ica; by S. W. Williston........................................................................ 138 Affinities and origin of the Antillean mammals ; by W. D. Matthew 138 Fresh-water fish faunas of North and South America; by C. H. Eigenmann.................................................................................................138 Evidence of recent changes of level in Porto Rico, as shown by studies in the Ponce district; by Graham John Mitchell............ 138 Presentation of papers...................................................................................... 141 Generic nomenclature of the Proboscidea [abstract] ; by W. D. Matthew..................................................................................................... 141 ¡Session of Wednesday, January 2................................................... 141 Report of the Auditing Committee................................................................ 141 Presentation of papers...................................................................................... 142 Cretaceous overlaps in northwest Europe and their bearing on the bathymetric distribution of the Cretaceous Silicispongise [ab­ stract] ; by MarJorie O’Connell.......................................................... 142 New bathymetrical map of the West Indies region [abstract] ; by Chester A. Reeds..................................................................................... 142 Isolation as a factor in the development of Paleozoic faunas [ab­ stract] ; by Amadeus W. Grabau...................................................... 143 An Ordovician fauna from southeastern Alaska [abstract] ; by Edwin Kirk.............................................................................................. 143 Affinities and phylogeny of the extinct Camelidse [abstract] ; by W. D. Matthew........................................................................................ 144 Rocky Mountains section in the vicinity of Whitemans Pass [ab­ stract] ; by C. W. Drysdale and L. D. Burling.............................. 145 Further light on the earlier stratigraphy of the Canadian Cor­ dillera [abstract] ; by Lancaster D. Burling.................................. 145 Evolution of vertebrae; by S. W. Williston........................................ 146 Diseases of the Mosasaurs [abstract] ; by Roy L. Moodie..............147 Report on a collection of Oligocene plant fossils from Montana [abstract] ; by O. E. Jennings............................................................. 147 New Tillodont skull from the Huerfano Basin, Colorado [ab­ stract] ; by Walter Granger................................................................. 147 Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on April 10, 2015 CONTENTS 121 Page Mollusca of the Carrizo Creek beds and their Caribbean affinities [abstract]; by Roy E. Dickerson...................................................... 148 Proposed correlation of the Pacific and Atlantic Eocene [ab­ stract] ; by Roy E. Dickerson............................................................ 148 Paleozoic glaciation in southeastern Alaska [abstract]; by Edwin Kirk............................................................................................................. 149 Principles of classification of Cyclostome bryozoa [abstract]; by F. Canu and R. S. Bassler..................................................................151 Fauna of the Meganos group; by B. L. Clark.................................. 152 Fossil mammals of the Tiffany beds [abstract] ; by W. D. Matthew and Walter Granger............................................................................... 152 Fauna of the Idaho Tulare Pliocene of the Pacific Coast region; by J. C. Merriam.................................................................. ............... 152 Revision of the Pseudotapirs of the North American Eocene [ab­ stract]; by O. A. Peterson.................................................................. 152 Notes on the American Pliocene rhinoceroses [abstract]; by W. D. Matthew........................................................................................ 153 New artiodactyls from the Upper Eocene of the TJinta Basin, Utah [abstract]; by O. A. Peterson.................................................. 153 Marine Oligocene of the west coast of North America [abstract]; by B. L. Clark and Ralph Arnold.................................................... 153 The question of paleoecology; by F. E. Clements.............................. 154 Note on the evolution of the femoral trochanters in reptiles and mammals; by William H. Gregory.................................................... 154 Carboniferous species of “Zaphrentis”; by G. H. Chadwick..........154 Extinct vertebrate faunas from, the Badlands of Bautista Creek and San Timoteo Canyon of southern California; by Childs Frick........................................................................................................... 154 Notes on Eifel brachiopods; by G. H. Chadwick.............................. 154 Register of the Pittsburgh meeting,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.1 První Chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV GEOLOGICKÝCH VĚD Jakub Březina Rešerše k bakalářské práci Využití mikrostruktur klů neogenních chobotnatců na příkladu rodu Zygolophodon Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Martin Ivanov, Dr. Brno 2012 OBSAH 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců 3 1.1 První chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2. Kly chobotnatců a jejich mikrostruktura 9 2.1 Přírůstky v klech chobotnatců 11 2.1.1 Využití přírůstků v klech chobotnatců 11 2.2 Schregerův vzor 12 2.2.1 Stavba Schregerova vzoru 12 2.2.2 Využití Schregerova vzoru 12 2.3 Dentinové kanálky 15 3 Sedimenty s nálezy savců v okolí Mikulova 16 3.1 Baden 17 3.2 Pannon a Pont 18 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců Současná systematika chobotnatců není kompletně odvozena od jejich fylogeneze, rekonstruované pomocí kladistických metod. Diskutované skupiny tak mnohdy nepředstavují monofyletické skupiny. Přestože jsou taxonomické kategorie matoucí (např. Laurin 2005), jsem do jisté míry nucen je používat. Některým skupinám úrovně stále přiřazeny nebyly a zde této skutečnosti není přisuzován žádný význam. V této rešerši jsem se zaměřil hlavně na poznatky, které následovaly po vydání knihy; The Proboscidea: Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives, od Shoshaniho a Tassyho (1996). Chobotnatci jsou součástí skupiny Tethytheria společně s anthracobunidy, sirénami a desmostylidy (Shoshani 1998; Shoshani & Tassy 1996; 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009). Základní klasifikace sestává ze dvou skupin. Ze skupiny Plesielephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Numidotheriidae, Barytheriidae a Deinotheridae a ze skupiny Elephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Palaeomastodontidae, Phiomiidae, Mammutida, Gomphotheriidae, tetralofodontní gomfotéria, Stegodontidae a Elephantidae (Shoshani & Marchant 2001; Shoshani & Tassy 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoths and Mastodons
    AMERI AN MU E.UM OF ATU R I HI 1 R Mammoths and Mastodons By W. D. MATTHEW . THE. AMERICAN MASTODON Model by Charles R. Knight, based upon The Warren Mastodon skeleton in the American Museum of Natural History No. 43 Of THE GUIDE LEAFLET SERIES.-NOVE.MBER, 1915. Aft, O.~born THE WARREN MASTODON SKELETON IN THE AMERICAN MUSEUM . Mammoths and Mastodons A guide to th collections of fossil proboscideans in the Ameri an Museum of Natural History By W. D. MATTHEW 0 TE.i. T Pag 1. L ~TROD T RY. Di tribulion. Early Di coYerie . .............. ~. THE ExTL -cT ELEPHA_~T . The tru mammoth-~ la kan mamm th - k 1 t n from Indiana- ize of the mammoth-th Columbian 1 - phant- th Imperial lephant-extin t 011 World elephant - Plio n and Plei tocene elephant ' of Inclia-e,·olution f lephant from n1a to don ......................... .. ............... .. ..... ... 3. THE ... :\IERICAX :MA TODOX. Teeth f the ma tod n-habit an 1 en­ Yironment-the w·arren ma t don-male and femal kull -di tribu- tion of the ... merican ma todon . 1 z ..J.. THE LATER TERTB.RY 11A TODOX . The two-tu ked mat don Dibelodon-the long-jawed ma. t don Tetralophodon-the b aked ma todon Rhyncotherium-the primitiYe four tu k d ma tod n . Trilophod n-the Dinotherium.. 1.5 THE EARLY TERTL\.RY AxcE TOR OF THE 11A TODOX . Palreoma tod n - M reritherium-character. and affinitie . I 6. THE E'.'OL TIOX OF THE PRoBo CIDEA. D ubtful po ition of :i\I rither­ ium-Palreoma todon a primiti, prob cidean-Dinoth rium an aberrant ide-branch-Tril phodon de.:,cended from Palreoma todon­ branching into everal phYla in ~Ii cene and Plioc ne- Dib lodon phylum in ~ ~ orth and outh America-~Ia tod n phylum-elephant phylum-origin and di per al of th probo cidea and th ir proo·re ,i,·e exti11ctio11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook Contains Preliminary Findings of a Number of Concurrent Projects Being Worked on by the Trip Leaders
    TH FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN-CELL, 45 FIELD CONFERENCE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE ALBUQUERQUE BASIN OCTOBER 12-14, 2001 SEAN D. CONNELL New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources-Albuquerque Office, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2808 Central Ave. SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 DAVID W. LOVE New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 JOHN D. SORRELL Tribal Hydrologist, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022 J. BRUCE J. HARRISON Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 Open-File Report 454C and D Initial Release: October 11, 2001 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 NMBGMR OFR454 C & D INTRODUCTION This field-guide accompanies the 45th annual Rocky Mountain Cell of the Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), held at Isleta Lakes, New Mexico. The Friends of the Pleistocene is an informal gathering of Quaternary geologists, geomorphologists, and pedologists who meet annually in the field. The field guide has been separated into two parts. Part C (open-file report 454C) contains the three-days of road logs and stop descriptions. Part D (open-file report 454D) contains a collection of mini-papers relevant to field-trip stops. This field guide is a companion to open-file report 454A and 454B, which accompanied a field trip for the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain/South Central Section of the Geological Society of America, held in Albuquerque in late April.
    [Show full text]
  • 09 Göhlich.Indd
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 108A Autor(en)/Author(s): Göhlich Ursula B. Artikel/Article: 9. Gomphotheres (Proboscidea, Mammalia). In: Daxner-Höck, Gudrun ed. Oligocene-Miocene Vertebrates from the Valley of Lakes (Central Mongolia): Morphology, phylogenetic and stratigraphic implications 271-289 ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 108 A 271–289 Wien, September 2007 Oligocene-Miocene Vertebrates from the Valley of Lakes (Central Mongolia): Morphology, phylogenetic and stratigraphic implications Editor: Gudrun DAXNER-HÖCK 9. Gomphotheres (Proboscidea, Mammalia) from the Early-Middle Miocene of Central Mongolia by Ursula B. GÖHLICH1 (With 1 text-figure, 3 tables and 1 plate) Manuscript submitted on August 31st 2005, the revised manuscript on January 26th 2006 Abstract Presented here is new fossil proboscidean material from the Miocene Loh Formation of the Valley of Lakes in Central Mongolia. Two, possibly three, different taxa of gomphotheres s. l. are represented in three different localities, but the fragmentary preservation of the couple of cheek teeth and some post- cranial bone remains restricts their systematic determination. Only one molar can be identified as cf. Gomphotherium mongoliense representing the crown morphology of the bunodont type of the "Gompho- therium angustidens group". The residual tooth and remains might belong to more derived, trilophodont gomphotheres of the genus Gomphotherium, or perhaps also to shovel-tusked gomphotheres. Key words: Mongolia, Loh Formation, Miocene, Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae, Gomphotherium. Zusammenfassung Diese Arbeit stellt neues Material fossiler Proboscidea aus der miozänen Loh Formation aus dem "Tal der Seen" in der Zentral-Mongolei vor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Proboscidea (Elephants) Professor Dr
    The Distribution of Proboscidea (Elephants) Professor Dr. Erich Thenius [In: Kosmos #5, May, pp. 235-242, 1964, Stuttgart] When I speak here about animals with a trunk, I do not mean the tapirs or pigs, but I refer only to the elephants and their ancestors, like the Mastodons and Dinotheria which we call the Proboscidea (after the Greek: proboscis = trunk). Their main characteristic is their remarkable trunk which has been fashioned to become a “gripping” organ. That organ was not present in the geologically oldest ancestors whose skeletons stem from the deposits of the Eocene (old Tertiary) in Africa. Even though we have no “soft tissues” of those animals, their skeletal features suffice to tell the scientist just what their bodily characteristics would have been. Thus also, we are not really going to discuss much about their distribution in historic times, but rather, we will concentrate on the development of these characteristic mammals, from their inception to their distribution in the past. A history of the Proboscidea is necessarily a history of their distribution in time and space. Information of these animals is available from numerous fossil findings in nearly all continents. But, before we even consider the fossil history, let us take a quick look of the current distribution of elephants which is shown in Figure 1. Nowadays, there are only two species of elephants: the Indian and African elephants. They not only differ geographically but also morphologically. That is to say, they are different in their bodily form and in their anatomy in several characteristics as every attentive zoo visitor who sees them side-by-side easily observes: The small-eared Indian elephant (Elephas maximus) has a markedly bowed upper skull; the African cousin (Loxodonta africana) has longer legs and markedly larger ears.
    [Show full text]
  • 18-Prothero Et Al (Massacre).P65
    Lucas et al., eds., 2008, Neogene Mammals. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 44. 239 MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MASSACRE LAKE BEDS (LATE HEMINGFORDIAN, EARLY MIOCENE), NORTHWEST NEVADA, AND THE AGE OF THE “PROBOSCIDEAN DATUM” IN NORTH AMERICA DONALD R. PROTHERO1, EDWARD BYRD DAVIS2 AND SAMANTHA S.B. HOPKINS2 1 Department of Geology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041; 2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Abstract—The “Proboscidean Datum” was proposed by Tedford et al. (1987) and Woodburne and Swisher (1995) as a marker of the late Barstovian (middle Miocene, about 14.5 Ma) in North America. Subsequently, a number of pre-late Barstovian proboscidean fossils have been reported, casting doubt on the validity of the Proboscidean Datum. The oldest of these is from the late Hemingfordian Massacre Lake local fauna of northwest Nevada, which produced a single proboscidean tooth fragment. Magnetic stratigraphy was conducted on these beds, which yielded a stable remanence held mainly in magnetite that was entirely reversed in polarity. Based on the 40Ar/39Ar date of 16.474 ±0.035 Ma at the top of the section, we correlate the Massacre Lake beds with earliest Chron C5Cr (16.4-17.3 Ma). In addition, a number of other early Barstovian magnetostratigraphic sections with Proboscidea are reviewed, and quite a few yield fossils that date between 15.8 and 16.2 Ma. Our analysis of faunal data suggests that these early occurrences are simply the first places colonized by the immigrating proboscideans and not marked by a unique ecological or taphonomic history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fossil Proboscideans of Bulgaria and the Importance of Some Bulgarian Finds – a Brief Review
    Historia naturalis bulgarica, The fossil proboscideans of Bulgaria 139 16: 139-150, 2004 The fossil proboscideans of Bulgaria and the importance of some Bulgarian finds – a brief review Georgi N. MARKOV MARKOV G. 2004. The fossil proboscideans of Bulgaria and the importance of some Bulgarian finds – a brief review. – Historia naturalis bulgarica, 16: 139-150. Abstract. The paper summarizes briefly the current data on Bulgarian fossil proboscideans, revised by the author. Finds of special interest and importance for different problems of proboscideanology are discussed, with some paleozoogeographical notes. Key words: Proboscidea, Neogene, Bulgaria, Systematics Introduction The following text is a brief summary of the results obtained during a PhD research (2000-2003; thesis in preparation) on the fossil proboscideans of Bulgaria. Various Bulgarian collections stock several hundred specimens of fossil proboscideans from more than a hundred localities in the country. BAKALOV & NIKOLOV (1962; 1964) summarized most of the finds collected from the beginning of the 20th century to the 1960s, the first of the cited papers dealing with deinotheres, mammutids and gomphotheres sensu lato, the second – with elephantids. Sporadic publications from the 1970s have added more material. During the 1980s and the 1990s there were practically no studies by Bulgarian authors describing new material or revising the proboscidean fossils already published. Bulgarian material has been discussed by TASSY (1983; 1999), TOBIEN (1976; 1978; 1986; 1988), METZ- MULLER (1995; 1996a,b; 2000), and more recently by MARKOV et al. (2002), HUTTUNEN (2002a,b), HUTTUNEN & GÖHLICH (2002), LISTER & van ESSEN (2003), and MARKOV & SPASSOV (2003a,b). During the last two decades, a large amount of unpublished material was gathered, and many of the previously published finds needed a serious revision.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleobiogeography of Trilophodont Gomphotheres (Mammalia: Proboscidea)
    Revista Mexicana deTrilophodont Ciencias Geológicas, gomphotheres. v. 28, Anúm. reconstruction 2, 2011, p. applying235-244 DIVA (Dispersion-Vicariance Analysis) 235 Paleobiogeography of trilophodont gomphotheres (Mammalia: Proboscidea). A reconstruction applying DIVA (Dispersion-Vicariance Analysis) María Teresa Alberdi1,*, José Luis Prado2, Edgardo Ortiz-Jaureguizar3, Paula Posadas3, and Mariano Donato1 1 Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, España. 2 INCUAPA, Departamento de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional del Centro, Del Valle 5737, B7400JWI Olavarría, Argentina. 3 LASBE, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque S/Nº, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina. * [email protected] ABSTRACT The objective of our paper was to analyze the distributional patterns of trilophodont gomphotheres, applying an event-based biogeographic method. We have attempted to interpret the biogeographical history of trilophodont gomphotheres in the context of the geological evolution of the continents they inhabited during the Cenozoic. To reconstruct this biogeographic history we used DIVA 1.1. This application resulted in an exact solution requiring three vicariant events, and 15 dispersal events, most of them (i.e., 14) occurring at terminal taxa. The single dispersal event at an internal node affected the common ancestor to Sinomastodon plus the clade Cuvieronius – Stegomastodon. A vicariant event took place which resulted in two isolated groups: (1) Amebelodontinae (Africa – Europe – Asia) and (2) Gomphotheriinae (North America). The Amebelodontinae clade was split by a second vicariant event into Archaeobelodon (Africa and Europe), and the ancestors of the remaining genera of the clade (Asia). In contrast, the Gomphotheriinae clade evolved mainly in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Remains of Zygolophodon Turicensis (Proboscidea, Mammutidae) from the Coal Mines Near Bitola, Republic of Macedonia
    Remains of Zygolophodon turicensis (Proboscidea, Mammutidae) from the coal mines... 157 Historia naturalis bulgarica, 20: 157-162, 2012 Remains of Zygolophodon turicensis (Proboscidea, Mammutidae) from the coal mines near Bitola, Republic of Macedonia Risto GAREVSKI, Biljana GAREVSKA, Georgi N. MARKOV GAREVSKI R., GAREVSKA B., MARKOV G.N. 2012. Remains of Zygolophodon turicensis (Proboscidea, Mammutidae) from the coal mines near Bitola, Republic of Macedonia. – Historia naturalis bulgarica, 20: 157-162. Abstract. We report Zygolophodon turicensis (Schinz, 1824) from the Miocene deposits in a coal mine near Bitola, Republic of Macedonia, and refer a misidentified molar from Nerezi near Skopje published in the 1930s to the same species. Zygolophodon turicensis is a new taxon to the fossil fauna of Macedonia, and the finds discussed in the paper are among the few fossils of pre-Turolian age from the country. Key words: Proboscidea, Mammutidae, Zygolophodon, Miocene, Macedonia Introduction The specimens described below are an accidental find from the coal mines of the thermal power station near Bitola in the southwest of the Republic of Macedonia. Found in sandy deposits, the molars most probably belong to the same individual. Material and methods Material: Left and right m2-m3, coal mine near Bitola, stored at the Bitola Natural History Museum (BiNHM), coll. no. 13536. Methods: Dental nomenclature follows TASSY (1996). Measurements (in mm) taken by B. Garevska. Systematic palaeontology Order Proboscidea Illiger, 1811 Family Mammutidae Hay, 1922 Genus Zygolophodon Vacek, 1877 Zygolophodon turicensis (Schinz, 1824) All four molars (Fig.1, Fig. 2) are in a rather good condition. The left m2 is preserved very well.
    [Show full text]
  • En El Mioceno Tardío De Chiapas, México
    Arculo cienfico Lum/enero-junio, vol. 2, no. 1, pag. 18-29 TELEOCERAS Y CF. PERACERAS (PERISSODACTYLA, RHINOCEROTIDAE) EN EL MIOCENO TARDÍO DE CHIAPAS, MÉXICO Gerardo Carbot-Chanona Departamento de Paleontología, Dirección de Gestión, Investigación y Educación Ambiental, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia Natural. Calzada de Las Personas Ilustres S/N, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. [email protected] RESUMEN Se describen restos fósiles de rinoceronte recolectados en la localidad Puente Ixcán, municipio de Ocosingo, Chiapas, México. El mate- rial consiste en un P2 derecho y un radio derecho completo que presenta evidencias de arrastre. Los caracteres morfológicos y merís- cos, así como el rango temporal de la asociación faunísca, permiten asignar los ejemplares a Teleoceras cf. T. hicksi y cf. Peraceras sp. Los restos de rinoceronte se encuentran asociados con tortugas trioníquidas, cf. Crocodylus sp., un Caimaninae indeterminado, Gomp- hotherium sp. cf. G. hondurensis y un caballo indeterminado. La presencia de cf. T. hicksi y cf. G. hondurensis en la asociación faunísca permite proponer que pertenece al NALMA Henfiliano, documentando de esta manera la distribución más sureña de vertebrados terrestres del Mioceno tardío en México. Palabras clave: Rinoceronte, Neógeno, NALMA Henfiliano, asociación de vertebrados. ABSTRACT Rhinoceros fossil remains collected in the Puente Ixcán locality, Ocosingo municipality, Chiapas, Mexico are described. The material consists of a right P2 and a well-preserved right radius, that show dragging marks. The morphological and merisc characters, as well as temporal range of the faunal associaon, allow to assign the specimens as Teleoceras cf. T. hicksi and cf. Peraceras sp. The rhinoceros remains are associated with trionychid tortoises, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.FOSSIL PROBOSCIDEA from the UPPER CENOZOIC OF
    Revista Geológica de América Central ISSN: 0256-7024 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Lucas, Spencer G.; Alvarado, Guillermo E. FOSSIL PROBOSCIDEA FROM THE UPPER CENOZOIC OF CENTRAL AMERICA: TAXONOMY, EVOLUTIONARY AND PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHIC SIGNIFICANCE Revista Geológica de América Central, núm. 42, 2010, pp. 9-42 Universidad de Costa Rica San José, Costa Rica Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45437349001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Geológica de América Central, 42: 9-42, 2010 ISSN: 0256-7024 FOSSIL PROBOSCIDEA FROM THE UPPER CENOZOIC OF CENTRAL AMERICA: TAXONOMY, EVOLUTIONARY AND PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHIC SIGNIFICANCE Proboscideos FÓsiles del Cenozoico Superior de AMÉrica Central: TaxonomÍA, evoluciÓN Y significado paleogeogrÁfico Spencer G. Lucas1* & Guillermo E. Alvarado2 1New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road N.W., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104 USA 2Escuela Centroamericana de Geología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Apdo. 214, 2060, San José, Costa Rica *Autor para contacto: [email protected] (Recibido: 03/02/2010; aceptado: 22/06/2010) ABSTRACT: Fossils of proboscideans from Central America are assigned to four genera: Gomphotherium, Cuvieronius, Mammut and Mammuthus. Previous reports of Stegomastodon, Rhynchotherium and Haplomastodon from Central Amer- ica are based on incorrect taxonomic identifications or on fossils not definitely diagnostic of these genera. The oldest proboscidean records from Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Costa Rica) are Late Miocene (early Hemphillian, ~ 7 Ma) records of Gomphotherium, and this suggests that gomphotheres dispersed from North America to Central America about nine million years after they dispersed from Asia to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Miocene Robert E
    Mojave Miocene Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center 2015 Desert Symposium April 2015 Front cover: Rainbow Basin syncline, with rendering of saber cat by Katura Reynolds. Back cover: Cajon Pass Title page: Jedediah Smith’s party crossing the burning Mojave Desert during the 1826 trek to California by Frederic Remington Past volumes in the Desert Symposium series may be accessed at <http://nsm.fullerton.edu/dsc/desert-studies-center-additional-information> 2 2015 desert symposium Table of contents Mojave Miocene: the field trip 7 Robert E. Reynolds and David M. Miller Miocene mammal diversity of the Mojave region in the context of Great Basin mammal history 34 Catherine Badgley, Tara M. Smiley, Katherine Loughney Regional and local correlations of feldspar geochemistry of the Peach Spring Tuff, Alvord Mountain, California 44 David C. Buesch Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: preliminary findings 51 Katharine M. Loughney and Selena Y. Smith A fresh look at the Pickhandle Formation: Pyroclastic flows and fossiliferous lacustrine sediments 59 Jennifer Garrison and Robert E. Reynolds Biochronology of Brachycrus (Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae) and downward relocation of the Hemingfordian– Barstovian North American Land Mammal Age boundary in the respective type areas 63 E. Bruce Lander Mediochoerus (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae, Ticholeptinae) from the Barstow and Hector Formations of the central Mojave Desert Province, southern California, and the Runningwater and Olcott Formations of the northern Nebraska Panhandle—Implications of changes in average adult body size through time and faunal provincialism 83 E. Bruce Lander Review of peccaries from the Barstow Formation of California 108 Donald L.
    [Show full text]