Double Vision: Territorial Strategies in the Construction of National Identities in Germany, 1949–1979
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Double Vision: Territorial Strategies in the Construction of National Identities in Germany, 1949–1979 Guntram H. Herb Department of Geography, Middlebury College The establishment of two separate German states in 1949 had far-reaching effects on German national identity. Initially, both governments claimed to represent the German nation as a whole, and each professed an identity that went beyond its state borders. When the two German states started to recognize each other in the early 1970s, the GDR (East Germany) embarked on a separate path and posited that a separate Socialist nation had developed in the territorial confines of the GDR. Now the GDR needed to explain how its construction of identity could be unique when it had the same German cultural roots as the FRG (West Germany). In the FRG on the other hand, the narration of national identity had to square the recognition of the eastern border of the GDR in international treaties and with demands to former German territories beyond it. The paper addresses these challenges over territory and identity in the two German states, using a conceptual framework inspired by works from critical geopolitics and recent studies on nations as local metaphors. I identify and discuss three key elements that are central to territorial strategies in the construction of national identities: territorial differentiation, territorial bonding, and territorial script. Next, I apply these elements to an empirical analysis of identity construction in the FRG and GDR. Sources in- clude geography textbooks and atlases, which have a decisive influence on shaping conceptions of the nation. Dominant constructions of national identity in the two states did not respond to each other’s initiatives and failed to produce effective strategies by the end of the 1970s. Key Words: Germany, nation, territory, construction of national identity, geographic education. he establishment of two separate German states in Each German state faced a dilemma in trying to 1949 had far-reaching effects on German nation- construct a convincing vision of its version of national T al identity. Throughout the Cold War, the two identity. The construction of national identity in the GDR Germanys clashed not only over the political ideologies needed to show the development of a separate nation of their respective blocks but also over the territorial despite common roots in the German national movement extent of the German nation. The position of the Federal of the 19th century, a movement that was centered on Republic of Germany (FRG), was to keep issues of national the cultural unity of all Germans in Central Europe. The territory open and to maintain claims to large areas in construction of national identity in the FRG was pressed Poland and other East European countries.1 Communist to explain how the recognition of the eastern border of East Germany, the German Democratic Republic (GDR), the GDR, the so-called Oder-Neisse line, in inter- opposed these claims and denounced them as a continua- national treaties could be squared with demands for tion of the imperialist policies of the Hitler regime. The German unification beyond the confines of the two GDR regime did not refrain, however, from arguing for German states. The two challenges were explicitly the unification of the German nation under its leadership territorial in character. In the GDR, the difficulty was to until the late 1960s. When the Cold War began to thaw reduce the spatial extent of its national identity concep- and the FRG officially recognized the GDR as a result of tion to the confines of the GDR state territory, while in the Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik, the GDR changed its rhetoric. FRG, the struggle was to keep the full spatial extent of its Starting in the early 1970s, the government denied the national identity conception in light of the restrictive existence of significant commonalties between East and conditions of realpolitik. West Germany and posited that a separate socialist What was the response to these territorial challenges in nation had developed in the territorial confines of the each German state? In particular, what strategies were GDR. The FRG leaders vehemently rejected this claim employed in each state to construct a clear and convincing and maintained their stance on the continuity of a greater image of the territorial foundation of ‘‘its’’ national German nation. identity? To answer these questions, this investigation Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 2004, pp. 140–164 r 2004 by Association of American Geographers Initial submission, June 2000; revised submissions, September 2001 and August 2002; final acceptance, May 2003. Published by Blackwell Publishing, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, and 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, U.K. Territorial Strategies in the Construction of National Identities in Germany, 1949–1979 141 will focus on the period 1949 to 1979. This time frame was present the two fundamental components of territoriality chosen to trace back the development of the construction in German national identity, territorial differentiation and of national identity to the founding of the two states in territorial bonding. Then I shall address the territorial 1949 to understand the fundamental changes that scripts in divided Germany, paying particular attention to occurred around the end of the 1960s, extending to the how these scripts relate to the findings from territorial end of the 1970s when the notion of a separate GDR differentiation and territorial bonding. identity was fully developed. The 1980s witnessed new Part three will focus on the interactions between developments in terms of the identity construction in the the different strategies in the GDR and FRG, discuss the FRG and GDR in the changing context of the appearance effectiveness of the conceptual approach, and point out and disappearance of the Second Cold War, which will avenues for further studies. On a more general level, I be discussed in a forthcoming publication. hope to show in this paper that concepts informed by the The present paper has significance for understanding school of critical geopolitics can strengthen empirical- not only German identity during the time of division, but ly oriented work in historical geography and thus offer a national identity construction in general. The role of bridge between these areas of inquiry. territory in the construction of national identities is an important part of the political geography literature, whether dealing with national identity in the context of National Identity, Territory, and globalization (Marden 1997), identities related to associa- Geographic Knowledge tions of states, such as the European Union (Murphy 1999), or regional identities (White 2000). The case of Despite a veritable flood of scholarly works on national divided Germany allows a direct comparison of territorial issues, the concept of nation defies easy definition. A strategies in national identity construction between a useful approach is to conceptualize nations as narratives or centralized totalitarian and a federal democratic state and discourses (Bhabha 1990; Wodaket al. 1998). The idea of between an ethnic and a civic identity. narration explains that individuals acquire an identity by The main argument is organized into three parts. In conveying the often discordant and conflicting experi- part one, I shall develop a theoretical framework for the ences and events of their past as a coherent story to others. investigation, conceiving nations as narrative identities The elements of the narrative, that is, different experi- and combining works from critical geopolitics with recent ences and events, can be arranged and rearranged, studiesonnations aslocalmetaphorstooffera more balanc- interpreted and reinterpreted to resolve discontinuities ed conceptualization of nations as forms of territoriality. and changes. The narrative provides continuity and The argument here is that the territorial strategies in the coherence because the plot can always be revisited to construction of identities can be made more tenable produce an acceptable story that fits new circumstances through a two-step process. First, the territoriality of and gives meaning to one’s existence (Wodak et al. 1998, national identity is dissected into its two fundamental 55–56; Langthaler 2002, 788). The narrative construc- components, territorial differentiation and territorial bond- tion of individual identity also applies to nations. As ing. Second, the rationale behind the territorial strategy— Bhabha (1990, 3) points out, nationalist discourses seek to what I term the ‘‘territorial script’’—is conceived as a present nations as ‘‘holistic concepts located within ‘‘geograph.’’ Territorial differentiation and territorial bond- an evolutionary narrative of historical continuity.’’ For ing offer insights into the building blocks of territorial example, in the narration of the national history, every strategies in the construction of national identity. The new historian makes corrections to the descriptions and script allows us to see the broader narrative that serves explanations of earlier historians and eventually also to as a justification for the strategy. The advantage of the the events themselves on which the historiographical approach is that it provides a clear structure and sound work was based (Wodaket al. 1998, 57, fn. 48). Therefore, basis for the analysis of a highly complex phenomenon. national traditions have to be viewed as myths (Connor