DOCSLIB.ORG

What Is Internal Audit? Operational Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Is Internal Audit? Operational Information internal controls, the internal audit activity What is internal auditing? provides assurance to management and the Performed by professionals with an in-depth audit committee that internal controls are understanding of the business culture, systems, effective and working as intended. The internal and processes, the internal audit activity provides audit activity is led by the chief audit executive assurance that internal controls in place are (CAE). The CAE delineates the scope of adequate to mitigate the risks, governance activities, authority, and independence for processes are effective and efficient, and internal auditing in a written charter that is organizational goals and objectives are met. approved by the audit committee. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) has An effective internal audit activity is a valuable developed the globally accepted definition of resource for management and the board or its internal auditing, as follows: equivalent, and the audit committee due to its understanding of the organization and its culture, Internal Auditing is an independent, objective operations, and risk profile. The objectivity, skills, assurance and consulting activity designed to and knowledge of competent internal auditors add value and improve an organization's can significantly add value to an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish internal control, risk management, and its objectives by bringing a systematic, governance processes. Similarly an effective disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the internal audit activity can provide assurance to effectiveness of risk management, control, and other stakeholders such as regulators, governance processes. employees, providers of finance, and shareholders. Independence is established by the organizational and reporting structure. Objectivity As the primary body for the internal audit is achieved by an appropriate mind-set. The profession, The IIA maintains the International internal audit activity evaluates risk exposures Standards for the Professional Practice of relating to the organization's governance, Internal Auditing and the profession s Code of operations and information systems, in relation Ethics. IIA members are required to adhere to to: the Standards and Code of Ethics. Effectiveness and efficiency of operations. Reliability and integrity of financial and What is internal audit? operational information. The role of internal audit is to provide . Safeguarding of assets. independent assurance that an organisation’s . Compliance with laws, regulations, and risk management, governance and internal contracts. control processes are operating effectively. Internal auditors deal with issues that are Based on the results of the risk assessment, the fundamentally important to the survival and internal auditors evaluate the adequacy and prosperity of any organisation. Unlike external effectiveness of how risks are identified and auditors, they look beyond financial risks and managed in the above areas. They also assess statements to consider wider issues such as the other aspects such as ethics and values within organisation’s reputation, growth, its impact on the organization, performance management, the environment and the way it treats its communication of risk and control information employees. within the organization in order to facilitate a good governance process. Internal auditors have to be independent people who are willing to stand up and be counted. Their The internal auditors are expected to provide employers value them because they provide an recommendations for improvement in those independent, objective and constructive view. To areas where opportunities or deficiencies are do this, they need a remarkably varied mix of identified. While management is responsible for skills and knowledge. They might be advising the 1 project team running a difficult change programme one day, or investigating a complex more than 36,000 miles. It was also one of the largest overseas fraud the next. independent developers and producers of electricity in From very early on in their careers, they talk to the world, serving both industrial and emerging executives at the very top of the organisation markets. Enron was also a major supplier of solar and about complex, strategic issues, which is one of the most challenging and rewarding parts of their wind renewable energy worldwide, managed the role. largest portfolio of natural gas-related risk What is the difference between internal and external audit? management contracts in the world, and was one of the world's biggest independent oil and gas exploration Internal auditors are often confused with external auditors, but there are significant differences companies. In North America, Enron was the largest between the two groups. Internal auditors look at all the risks facing an organisation and what is wholesale marketer of natural gas and electricity. being done to manage these risks. External auditors on the other hand look at financial Enron pioneered innovative trading products, such as accounts. So internal audit’s role is broader and might, for example, include auditing the gas futures and weather futures, significantly reputational risk that a company could be damaged by using cheap labour in foreign modernizing the utilities industry. After a surge of countries. It could also include auditing operational risks such as poor health and safety growth in the early 1990s, the company ran into procedures, or strategic risks such as the board stretching company resources by producing too difficulties. The magnitude of Enron's losses was many products. hidden from stockholders. The company folded after a failed merger deal with Dynegy Inc. in 2001 brought to light massive financial finagling. The company had ranked number seven on the Fortune 500, and its there are 3 types of Audit : failure was the biggest bankruptcy in American history. 1. Internal audit ( first party audit),to ensure implementing, maintaining and improvement of the system audited. Company Origins 2.Customer audit ( second party audit), to evaluate the suppliers performance and compliance for Enron began as Northern Natural Gas Company, standards. organized in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1930 by three other 3.External audit (third party audit), to ensure implementing and documenting according to companies. North American Light & Power Company standards. and United Light & Railways Company each held a 35 ENRON percent stake in the new enterprise, while Lone Star Gas Corporation owned the remaining 30 percent. The Before filing for bankruptcy in 2001, Enron Corporation company's founding came just a few months after the was one of the largest integrated natural gas and stock market crash of 1929, an inauspicious time to electricity companies in the world. It marketed natural launch a new venture. Several aspects of the Great gas liquids worldwide and operated one of the largest Depression actually worked in Northern's favor, natural gas transmission systems in the world, totaling however. Consumers initially were not enthusiastic 2 about natural gas as a heating fuel, but its low cost led wells. Another subsidiary, Northern Plains Natural Gas to its acceptance during tough economic times. High Company, was established in 1954 and eventually unemployment brought the new company a ready would bring Canadian gas reserves to the continental supply of cheap labor to build its pipeline system. In United States. addition, the 24-inch steel pipe, which could transport Through its Peoples division, the parent company six times the amount of gas carried by 12-inch cast acquired a natural gas system in Dubuque, Iowa, from iron pipe, had just been developed. Northern grew North Central Public Service Company in 1957. In rapidly in the 1930s, doubling its system capacity 1964, Council Bluffs Gas Company of Iowa was within two years of its incorporation and bringing the acquired and merged into the Peoples division. first natural gas supply to the state of Minnesota. Northern created two more subsidiaries in 1960: Public Offering in the 1940s Northern Gas Products Company (later Enron Gas Processing Company), for the purpose of building and The 1940s brought changes in Northern's regulation operating a natural gas extraction plant in Bushton, and ownership. The Federal Power Commission, Kansas; and Northern Propane Gas Company, for retail created as a result of the Natural Gas Act of 1938, sales of propane. Northern Natural Gas Producing regulated the natural gas industry's rates and Company was sold to Mobil Corporation in 1964, but expansion. In 1941, United Light & Railways sold its the parent company continued expanding on other share of Northern to the public, and in 1942 Lone Star fronts. In 1966, it formed Hydrocarbon Transportation Gas distributed its holdings to its stockholders. North Inc. (later Enron Liquids Pipeline Company) to own and American Light & Power would hold on to its stake until operate a pipeline system carrying liquid fuels. 1947, when it sold its shares to underwriters who then Eventually, this system would bring natural gas liquids offered the stock to the public. Northern was listed on from plants in the Midwest and Rocky Mountains to the New York Stock Exchange that year. upper-Midwest markets, with connections for eastern In 1944, Northern acquired the gas-gathering and markets as well. transmission lines of Argus Natural Gas Company. The Growth through Acquisitions following year, the Argus properties were consolidated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enron's Pawns
    Enron’s Pawns How Public Institutions Bankrolled Enron’s Globalization Game byJim Vallette and Daphne Wysham Sustainable Energy and Economy Network Institute for Policy Studies March 22, 2002 About SEEN The Sustainable Energy and Economy Network, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (Washington, DC), works in partnership with citizens groups nationally and globally on environment, human rights and development issues with a particular focus on energy, climate change, environmental justice, and economic issues, particularly as these play out in North/South relations. SEEN views these issues as inextricably linked to global security, and therefore applies a human security paradigm as a framework for guiding its work. The reliance of rich countries on fossil fuels fosters a climate of insecurity, and a rationale for large military budgets in the North. In the South, it often fosters or nurtures autocratic or dictatorial regimes and corruption, while exacerbating poverty and destroying subsistence cultures and sustainable livelihoods. A continued rapid consumption of fossil fuels also ensures catastrophic environmental consequences: Climate change is a serious, emerging threat to the stability of the planet's ecosystems, and a particular hazard to the world's poorest peo- ple. The threat of climate change also brings more urgency to the need to reorient energy-related investments, using them to provide abundant, clean, safe energy for human needs and sustainable livelihoods. SEEN views energy not as an issue that can be examined in isolation, but rather as a vital resource embedded in a development strategy that must simultaneously address other fundamentals, such as education, health care, public par- ticipation in decision-making, and economic opportunities for the poorest.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Corporate Deceit: the Enron Way / 18 (7) 3-38
    NEGOTIUM Revista Científica Electrónica Ciencias Gerenciales / Scientific e-journal of Management Science PPX 200502ZU1950/ ISSN 1856-1810 / By Fundación Unamuno / Venezuela / REDALYC, LATINDEX, CLASE, REVENCIT, IN-COM UAB, SERBILUZ / IBT-CCG UNAM, DIALNET, DOAJ, www.jinfo.lub.lu.se Yokohama National University Library / www.scu.edu.au / Google Scholar www.blackboard.ccn.ac.uk / www.rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de / www.bib.umontreal.ca / [+++] Cita / Citation: Amol Gore, Guruprasad Murthy (2011) A CASE OF CORPORATE DECEIT: THE ENRON WAY /www.revistanegotium.org.ve 18 (7) 3-38 A CASE OF CORPORATE DECEIT: THE ENRON WAY EL CASO ENRON. Amol Gore (1) and Guruprasad Murthy (2) VN BRIMS Institute of Research and Management Studies, India Abstract This case documents the evolution of ‘fraud culture’ at Enron Corporation and vividly explicates the downfall of this giant organization that has become a synonym for corporate deceit. The objectives of this case are to illustrate the impact of culture on established, rational management control procedures and emphasize the importance of resolute moral leadership as a crucial qualification for board membership in corporations that shape the society and affect the lives of millions of people. The data collection for this case has included various sources such as key electronic databases as well as secondary data available in the public domain. The case is prepared as an academic or teaching purpose case study that can be utilized to demonstrate the manner in which corruption creeps into an ambitious organization and paralyses the proven management control systems. Since the topic of corporate practices and fraud management is inherently interdisciplinary, the case would benefit candidates of many courses including Operations Management, Strategic Management, Accounting, Business Ethics and Corporate Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Enron: Market Exploitation and Correction
    Financial Decisions, Spring 2002, Article 1. Enron: Market Exploitation And Correction Ronnie J. Clayton William Scroggins Christopher Westley1 Department of Finance, Economics and Accounting, Jacksonville State University Abstract This paper chronicles the rise and fall of Enron, Inc., the once powerful energy firm based in Houston, Texas. The history of the firm is reviewed, the November 2001 financial restatement is examined to show the impact of the failure to report the appropriate financial position for the firm, and reasons for the firm’s downfall are considered. While Enron’s decline may currently be considered a market failure, it is likely that the events surrounding the firm in 2001 will ultimately be considered a case in which the market worked to ferret out deception and poor judgment on the part of Enron’s management. I. Introduction Early in the year 2002 one could not escape the continuing publicity concerning the once powerful, now bankrupt, Enron, Inc. In a span of less than two months during the autumn of 2001, the firm fell from business idol to congressional doormat, or somewhat more importantly, from the new business model to a model of business greed and ultimate failure. Of course the fall of Enron did not occur in the few days of October and November 2001. The event that started it all was the 1993 formation, in partnership with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), of the Joint Energy Development Investment Limited Partnership (JEDI).2 The ultimate failure was designed by JEDI and set into place in a galaxy not so far away and in a time not so long ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Case Studies in Accounting Fraud”
    “Classic Case Studies in Accounting Fraud” A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors. by Justin Matthew Mock May 2004 Oxford, Ohio ABSTRACT “Classic Case Studies in Accounting Fraud” by Justin Matthew Mock Over the past several years, accounting fraud has dominated the headlines of mainstream news. While these recent cases all involve sums of money far in excess of any before, accounting fraud is certainly not a new phenomenon. Since the early days on Wall Street, fraud has consistently fooled the markets, investors, and auditors alike. In this thesis, an analysis of several cases of accounting fraud is conducted with background information, fraud logistics, and accounting and auditing violations all subject to study. This paper discusses specific cases of fraud and presents the issues that have been and must continue to be addressed as companies push the envelope of acceptable accounting standards. The discussion and findings demonstrate the ever-present potential for fraud in a variety of accounts, companies, industries, and time periods, while also having a powerful influence on an auditor’s work and preconceptions going forward. iii iv “Classic Case Studies in Accounting Fraud” by Justin Matthew Mock Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Dr. Phil Cottell _________________________, Reader Dr. Larry Rankin _________________________, Reader Mr. Jeffrey Vorholt Accepted by: __________________________, Director, University Honors Program v vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “Classic Case Studies in Accounting Fraud” was completed under the direction of the Miami University Honors Program. The Honors Program provided financial support essential to the project’s research and successful completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2002 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Business Activities.................................................... Inside Front Cover Corporate Performance vs. the S&P 500 ................................................ 2 Chairman's Letter*.................................................................................. 3 Selected Financial Data For The Past Five Years ..................................................................................24 Acquisition Criteria ................................................................................25 Independent Auditors' Report .................................................................25 Consolidated Financial Statements.........................................................26 Management's Discussion.......................................................................52 Owner's Manual......................................................................................68 Common Stock Data...............................................................................75 Major Operating Companies...................................................................76 Directors and Officers of the Company.........................Inside Back Cover *Copyright © 2003 By Warren E. Buffett All Rights Reserved Business Activities Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is a holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in a number of diverse business activities. The most important of these is the property and casualty insurance business conducted on both a direct and reinsurance basis
    [Show full text]
  • Enron Scandal: the Fall of a Wall Street Darling
    Enron Scandal: The Fall of a Wall Street Darling The story of Enron Corp. is the story of a company that reached dramatic heights, only to face a dizzying fall. Its collapse affected thousands of employees and shook Wall Street to its core. At Enron's peak, its shares were worth $90.75; when it declared bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, they were trading at $0.26. To this day, many wonder how such a powerful business, at the time one of the largest companies in the U.S, disintegrated almost overnight and how it managed to fool the regulators with fake holdings and off-the-books accounting for so long. Enron's Energy Origins Enron was formed in 1985, following a merger between Houston Natural Gas Co. and Omaha-based InterNorth Inc. Following the merger, Kenneth Lay, who had been the chief executive officer (CEO) of Houston Natural Gas, became Enron's CEO and chairman and quickly rebranded Enron into an energy trader and supplier. Deregulation of the energy markets allowed companies to place bets on future prices, and Enron was poised to take advantage. In 1990, Lay created the Enron Finance Corp. To head it, he appointed Jeffrey Skilling, whose work as a McKinsey & Co consultant had impressed Lay. Skilling was at the time one of the youngest partners at McKinsey. Why Enron Collapsed Skilling joined Enron at an auspicious time. The era's regulatory environment allowed Enron to flourish. At the end of the 1990s, the dot-com bubble was in full swing, and the Nasdaq hit 5,000.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY the Effects of Enron a Thesis
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY The Effects of Enron A Thesis Submitted to the University Honors Program In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Baccalaureate Degree With Upper Division Honors Department Of Management By Taniel Khamo DeKalb, Illinois Graduation Date: May 10, 2003 University Honors Program Capstone Approval Page Capstone Title: (print or type): Student Name (print or type): laY17~ I khtunO 11~1 V{r;.jc:, c- Faculty Supervisor (print or type): Faculty Approval Signature: Department of (print or type): Date of Approval (print or type): HONORS THESIS ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMISSION FORM AUTHOR: To. \') \ e... \ K hu \tv)0 THESIS TITLE:\ hf.. E.(.(ed ~ of f ~ {O V'\ ADVISOR: Of. PCt~ \ VIQj l.. i <- ADVISOR'S DEPT: MQ. V\..c..')f. W!~ Y\+ DISCIPLINE: M a. V\o..,< me. V\-t YEAR: J.00 3 PAGE LENGTH: J if BIBLIOGRAPHY: ILLUSTRATED: PUBLISHED (YES OR tiQ): LIST PUBLICATION: COPIES A VAILABLE (HARD COPY. MICROFILM. DISKETIE): ABSTRACT (100-200 WORDS): Honors Thesis Abstract The purpose ofthis study is to examine the effects ofEnron's collapse and the long-tenn implications of its failure. The areas affected by the company's demise are: society's perception of business, energy industry, large corporations, and regulation. One way the energy company was made apparently profitable was through a constant push for deregulation of the energy market. In 2000 Enron reported revenue of $100.8 billion, making them number seven on the Fortune 500 list ofthe largest companies in the country. It is know realized that Enron's accomplishments were due mostly to their misrepresentation of financial documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Lay After Merging the Natural Gas Pipeline Companies of Houston Natural Gas and Inter North
    INTRODUCTION Enron Corporation (former New York Stock Exchange ticker symbol ENE) was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the world's major electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $111 billion during 2000.[1] Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. RISE OF ENRON • Enron was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay after merging the natural gas pipeline companies of Houston Natural Gas and Inter North. • Enron rose to become the largest seller of natural gas in North America by 1992. • Enron pursued a diversification strategy in order to achieve further growth. • LINE of BUSINESS : Enron's predecessor was the Northern Natural Gas Company, which was formed in 1932, in Omaha, Nebraska. It was reorganized in 1979 as the main subsidiary of a holding company, InterNorth which was a diversified energy and energy related products company. InterNorth was a major business for natural gas production, transmission and marketing as well as for natural gas liquids and was an innovator in the plastics industry. THE SCANDAL • As often happens with buccaneering entrepreneurs, it got a case of hubris. It figured if it could trade energy, it could trade anything, anywhere, in the new virtual marketplace. Newsprint. Television advertising time. Insurance risk. High-speed data transmission. • All of these were converted into contracts -- called derivatives -- that were sold to investors. Enron poured billions into these trading ventures, and some failed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Accounting Fraud Before and After Sarbanes-Oxley Kayla Dowd
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 5-10-2016 A Comparison of Accounting Fraud Before and After Sarbanes-Oxley Kayla Dowd Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the Accounting Commons Recommended Citation Dowd, Kayla. (2016). A Comparison of Accounting Fraud Before and After Sarbanes-Oxley. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 165. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/165 Copyright © 2016 Kayla Dowd This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. A Comparison of Accounting Fraud Before and After Sarbanes-Oxley Kayla Dowd Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in Accounting & Finance Bridgewater State University May 10, 2016 Mark D. Crowley, DBA, CPA, Thesis Mentor Patricia C. Bancroft, DBA, CPA, Committee Member Caitlin Golden, CPA, CGMA, MSA, Committee Member 1 INTRODUCTION Within all trades of business, the potential for the perpetration of accounting fraud within companies is unfortunately not an infrequent occurrence. Accounting fraud is the “intentional misrepresentation or alteration of accounting records regarding sales, revenues, expenses, and other factors for a profit motive such as inflating company stock values, obtaining more favorable financing, or avoiding debt obligations” (Business Dictionary). The reasons for the frequent
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Enron's Collapse: Auditing the Accounting
    LESSONS LEARNED FROM ENRON’S COLLAPSE: AUDITING THE ACCOUNTING INDUSTRY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 6, 2002 Serial No. 107–83 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 77–986CC WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 14:53 May 15, 2002 Jkt 078865 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HEARINGS\77986 pfrm09 PsN: 77986 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE W.J. ‘‘BILLY’’ TAUZIN, Louisiana, Chairman MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan JOE BARTON, Texas HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CLIFF STEARNS, Florida RALPH M. HALL, Texas PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio RICK BOUCHER, Virginia JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey NATHAN DEAL, Georgia SHERROD BROWN, Ohio STEVE LARGENT, Oklahoma BART GORDON, Tennessee RICHARD BURR, North Carolina PETER DEUTSCH, Florida ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois GREG GANSKE, Iowa ANNA G. ESHOO, California CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia BART STUPAK, Michigan BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois TOM SAWYER, Ohio HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona GENE GREEN, Texas CHARLES ‘‘CHIP’’ PICKERING, Mississippi KAREN MCCARTHY, Missouri VITO FOSSELLA, New York TED STRICKLAND, Ohio ROY BLUNT, Missouri DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado TOM DAVIS, Virginia THOMAS M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Enron and the Creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    La Salle University La Salle University Digital Commons HON499 projects Honors Program Fall 2017 The alF l of Enron and the Creation of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 Megan Connell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/honors_projects Part of the Accounting Commons Recommended Citation Connell, Megan, "The alF l of Enron and the Creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002" (2017). HON499 projects. 19. http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/honors_projects/19 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in HON499 projects by an authorized administrator of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Fall of Enron and the Creation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 By: Megan Connell With assistance from: Dr. Bruce Leauby November 20, 2017 Table of Contents Abstract…………....………………………………………………………………………………2 Part 1: What is Fraud?........……………………………..…….…………………………………...3 1.1 The Fraud Triangle………………………………..………………….……………….4 1.2 Who Commits Fraud....….………..…..…..…..….……..………..………..…..………4 1.3 Risk Factors Related to Fraudulent Reporting..……….………………………………5 1.4 How Can Fraud be Prevented…………………………………………………………5 1.5 How Can Fraud be Detected…………………………………………………………..6 Part 2: The Enron Scandal..……..……………………………………………………………….7 2.1 What Was Enron………………………………………………………………………7 2.2 Who Were the Key People Involved..…………..……..……….……………………..7
    [Show full text]
  • Enron: a Select Chronology of Congressional, Corporate, and Government Activities
    Order Code RL31364 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Enron: A Select Chronology of Congressional, Corporate, and Government Activities Updated March 18, 2003 J. Michael Anderson Information Research Specialist Information Research Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Enron: A Select Chronology of Corporate and Government Activities Summary Enron Corporation, which had more than $49 billion in total assets for 2001 and was listed as the seventh largest U.S. corporation (ranked by revenues in 2000) by Fortune magazine , filed for Chapter 11 reorganization protection on December 2, 2001. The Houston-based corporation and 13 affiliated entities filing for bankruptcy provoked intense media and congressional interest and questions involving the financial markets, securities and auditing firms, and corporate management and insurance and pension policies. The federal government is examining Enron’s corporate activities. Investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have commenced. Since December 2001, Congress has held numerous hearings on issues surrounding the Enron collapse, and additional hearings are scheduled. Numerous state and local governments have initiated legal proceedings against Enron and its affiliated entities. This report is a chronology of select major corporate and federal government events that are relevant to the collapse of Enron. Chronology entries were
    [Show full text]