DOCSLIB.ORG

50387-001: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
50387-001: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project Initial Environmental Examination August 2019 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project Zhambyl Province Subprojects Project No. 50387-001 Prepared by the Republican State Enterprise “KazvodKhoz”, Republic of Kazakhstan, for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation or, or reference to a particular territory or geographic are in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. TA-9317 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Initial Environmental Examination of Subprojects in Zhambyl Province Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................. viii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... viii 2. Description of the Project ................................................................................. viii 3. Key findings ...................................................................................................... ix 4. Public Consultation Process ............................................................................. ix 5. Recommended actions ...................................................................................... x A. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 A.1. Purpose of the report ......................................................................................... 1 A.2. Category of Project ............................................................................................ 2 A.3. Project proponent .............................................................................................. 2 A.4. Nature, size, and location of the subprojects ..................................................... 3 A.5. IEE Boundaries ................................................................................................. 3 A.6. Methodology applied ......................................................................................... 4 A.7. Constraints and limitations ................................................................................. 4 A.8. Structure of the report ........................................................................................ 4 B. Legal, policy and administrative framework ................................................... 6 B.1. General ............................................................................................................. 6 B.2. Country policies and administrative framework .................................................. 6 B.2.1. Overall legal framework ....................................................................................................... 6 B.2.2. Environmental Impact Assessment ..................................................................................... 6 B.2.3. Administrative Framework ................................................................................................... 7 B.3. Air, Water, Land and Noise Legislation .............................................................. 8 B.3.1. Air Quality Legislation .......................................................................................................... 8 B.3.2. Water Quality Legislation .............................................................................................. 9 B.3.3. Health and Safety........................................................................................................ 11 B.3.4. Physical Cultural Heritage ........................................................................................... 11 B.3.5. Waste .......................................................................................................................... 12 B.3.6. International Conventions and Treaties ...................................................................... 14 B.4. Environmental Quality Standards .................................................................... 15 B.4.1. Air Quality Standards .................................................................................................. 16 B.4.2. Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................. 16 B.4.3. Noise Standards .......................................................................................................... 19 B.5. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 ........................................................... 20 C. Project Description .......................................................................................... 24 C.1. Irrigation Rehabilitation Project ........................................................................ 24 C.2. Need for the Project ......................................................................................... 26 C.3. Location and scope ......................................................................................... 26 C.3.1. Subprojects location in Zhambyl Province .................................................................. 26 C.3.2 Scope of works ................................................................................................................ 36 C.4. Description of Typical Works ........................................................................... 42 C.4.1. Mechanical Cleaning ......................................................................................................... 42 C.4.2. Concrete Lining ........................................................................................................... 44 C.5. Alternatives. ....................................................................................................... 46 C.5.1 Lined vs. unlined canals alternatives .......................................................................... 46 C.5.2 “No project” alternative ................................................................................................ 47 C.5.3. Geogrids Alternative.................................................................................................... 47 D. Description of the Environment ..................................................................... 52 D.1. Physical Resources ........................................................................................... 52 D.1.1 Topography, geology and soils ....................................................................................... 52 D.1.2 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 55 D.1.3 Air quality ......................................................................................................................... 55 D.1.4 Hydrological resources and surface water quality ........................................................... 56 D.1.5. Natural Hazards ......................................................................................................... 62 D.1.6. Flora and fauna ........................................................................................................... 63 D.1.7 Protected areas ............................................................................................................... 64 ii TA-9317 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Initial Environmental Examination of Subprojects in Zhambyl Province D.1.8. Radiation ............................................................................................................................ 65 D.2. Socio-Economic Development ........................................................................... 66 D.2.1. Industries and Agriculture .................................................................................................. 66 D.2.2. Current Status of Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure ................................................... 68 D.3. Social and Cultural Resources ......................................................................... 69 D.3.1 Population and communities ........................................................................................... 69 D.3.2 Health & Education facilities ............................................................................................ 70 D.3.3. Ethnic Groups .................................................................................................................... 70 D.3.4. Languages ......................................................................................................................... 70 D.3.5. Religion .............................................................................................................................. 70 E. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................................... 71 E.1. Impacts .............................................................................................................. 71 E.1.1. Types of Project Impacts ................................................................................................... 72 E 1.2. Positive Project’s Impacts .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/2002/1 28 March 2002 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Road Transport Ad hoc Meeting on the Implementation of the AGR (Eighteenth session, 10-11 June 2002 agenda item 4) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX 1 OF THE AGR Transmitted by Kazakhstan The Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Kazakhstan, having reviewed the text of the European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries (AGR) in the light of amendments 1-8 to the original text, and also the updated version of the map of the international E road network, wishes to make the following observations. Kazakhstan’s Blueprint for road traffic development outlines six main transit corridors: 1. Tashkent - Shymkent - Taraz - Bishkek - Almaty - Khorgos; 2. Shymkent - Kyzylorda - Aktyubinsk - Uralsk - Samara; 3. Almaty - Karagandy - Astana - Petropavlovsk; 4. Astrakhan - Atyrau - Aktau - Turkmen frontier; 5. Omsk - Pavlodar - Semipalatinsk - Maikapshagai; 6. Astana - Kostanay - Chelyabinsk. GE.02- TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/2002/1 page 2 Accordingly, the following amendments and additions are proposed to annex I to the AGR and the draft map of the international road network: 1. E 40. After Kharkov extend as follows: … Lugansk - Volgograd - Astrakhan - Atyrau - Beineu - Kungrad - Nukus - Bukhara - Nawoy - Samarkand - Dzhizak - Tashkent - Shymkent - Taraz - Bishkek - Almaty - Sary-Ozek - Taldykorgan - Usharal - Taskesken - Ayaguz - Georgievka - Ust-Kamenogorsk - Leninogorsk - Ust-Kan. The Leninogorsk - Ust-Kan section should be indicated on the map. 2. E 38 should be extended to Shymkent. The Kyzylorda - Shymkent section should be assigned a dual number (E 123/E 38).
    [Show full text]
  • THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M STREET,NW WASHINGTON, DC 20037 Maria C
    THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M STREET,NW WASHINGTON, DC 20037 Maria C. Andrade-Stern Direct Diaf (202)261 -5396 Senior Contract Administrator FAX: (202)728-0231 [email protected] October 15,2003 Mr. John Lord Contracting Officer USAlDlAlmaty C/OAmerican Embassy 97A Furmanov Street Almaty, Kazakhstan 480091 RE: Contract No. EEU-I-00-99-00015-00,TO No. 81 1 UI Project 06901-01 5,06901 -016,06901 -017, & 06901-01 8 Central Asian Republics Local Government lnitiative Phase II Quarterly Task Order Progress and Cost Report, July to September 2003 Dear Mr. Lord: Please find enclosed Quarterly Task Order Progress and Cost Report, July to September 2003, Central Asian Republics Local Government lnitiative Phase 11. This report is required by Sections F.5 and F.6 of our Local Government Assistance lnitiative Indefinite Quantity Contract. Please direct any technical questions to Mr. Charles Undeland, Chief of Party, at t996-312-66-04-28or e-mail at [email protected]. Questions of a contractual nature should be addressed to me at (202) 261-5396. Sincerely, Maria C. Andrade-Stern Enclosures cc: Ivan Apanasevich (CEN, ASIAIODT) Mike Keshishian (USAIDMI) Charles Undeland (KyrgyzstanlUI) USAlD Development Clearinghouse IAC Deliverables File (06901-01 5 to 018) IAC Chron File QUARTERLY TASK ORDER PROGRESS AND COST REPORT CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS LOCAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE PHASE II JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2003 Prepared for Prepared by Charlie Undeland The Urban Institute Central Asian Republics Local Government Initiative Phase I1 United States Agency for International Development Contract No. EEU-I-00-99-00015-00,Task Order No. 81 1 THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 October 2003 (202) 833-7200 UI Project 06901-01 5,06901 -01 6, www.urban.org 06901-01 7 and 06901-01 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY 2003 .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Lutheran Church Moving to Boro for Lack of Space Here
    v.tnnoutli, 111 Read the Herald Read the Herald v For Local News For Lbcal News Serving Summit tor 68 Tear* Serving Summit tor 68 Ttar$ fttth Ye«r—No. 17 Ent*rt4 •• Srroatf CUt* Matirr »l Ib* Poatofflr* SUMMIT, N. J., THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1956 at Summit, fc. 4. lo«rr tb» Art of MUrtfc 1. ll?» $4 A YEAR 10 IEXTS First Lutheran Church Moving August City GOP Sets "Bonus" Parking That Of $748,245 To Boro For Lack of Space Here Up Headquarters On Bank Street City Has No Right Breaks Record Common Council ^>n Tuesday j For Campaign made a "gift" to shippers of free j Inadequate facilities combined with the need for New building permits issued further expansion have been listed by the First Lutheran Summit Republican Campaign off-street parking in the heart of j To Alter Streams during August reached a record- i Headquarters will open Satur- the business seitum. The Bank j Common Council on Tuesday Church of Summit as among the reasons for a proposed ni nt move to New Providence, the church Board of Administra- breaking $748,245 or $348,245 more day in the sure formerly oc- street lot, operated privately until I K advised a group'of home- tion announced on Tuesday. than the previous August record cupied by Siegel s Stationery Shop this week by the Summit Trust Co. owners residing in the area of at 394 Springfield avenue, it was and now owned by the nt\, will !>e Middle avenue that any altering In a secret ballot, participated set in 1953 and brought the year's announced by Kdward A.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberia, the Wandering Northern Terrane, and Its Changing Geography Through the Palaeozoic ⁎ L
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 29–74 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Siberia, the wandering northern terrane, and its changing geography through the Palaeozoic ⁎ L. Robin M. Cocks a, , Trond H. Torsvik b,c,d a Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK b Center for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, Trondheim, N-7401, Norway c Institute for Petroleum Technology and Applied Geophysics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 NTNU, Norway d School of Geosciences, Private Bag 3, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS, 2050, South Africa Received 27 March 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Available online 15 February 2007 Abstract The old terrane of Siberia occupied a very substantial area in the centre of today's political Siberia and also adjacent areas of Mongolia, eastern Kazakhstan, and northwestern China. Siberia's location within the Early Neoproterozoic Rodinia Superterrane is contentious (since few if any reliable palaeomagnetic data exist between about 1.0 Ga and 540 Ma), but Siberia probably became independent during the breakup of Rodinia soon after 800 Ma and continued to be so until very near the end of the Palaeozoic, when it became an integral part of the Pangea Supercontinent. The boundaries of the cratonic core of the Siberian Terrane (including the Patom area) are briefly described, together with summaries of some of the geologically complex surrounding areas, and it is concluded that all of the Palaeozoic underlying the West Siberian
    [Show full text]
  • Zhanat Kundakbayeva the HISTORY of KAZAKHSTAN FROM
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN THE AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Zhanat Kundakbayeva THE HISTORY OF KAZAKHSTAN FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO PRESENT TIME VOLUME I FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO 1991 Almaty "Кazakh University" 2016 ББК 63.2 (3) К 88 Recommended for publication by Academic Council of the al-Faraby Kazakh National University’s History, Ethnology and Archeology Faculty and the decision of the Editorial-Publishing Council R e v i e w e r s: doctor of historical sciences, professor G.Habizhanova, doctor of historical sciences, B. Zhanguttin, doctor of historical sciences, professor K. Alimgazinov Kundakbayeva Zh. K 88 The History of Kazakhstan from the Earliest Period to Present time. Volume I: from Earliest period to 1991. Textbook. – Almaty: "Кazakh University", 2016. - &&&& p. ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 In first volume of the History of Kazakhstan for the students of non-historical specialties has been provided extensive materials on the history of present-day territory of Kazakhstan from the earliest period to 1991. Here found their reflection both recent developments on Kazakhstan history studies, primary sources evidences, teaching materials, control questions that help students understand better the course. Many of the disputable issues of the times are given in the historiographical view. The textbook is designed for students, teachers, undergraduates, and all, who are interested in the history of the Kazakhstan. ББК 63.3(5Каз)я72 ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 © Kundakbayeva Zhanat, 2016 © al-Faraby KazNU, 2016 INTRODUCTION Данное учебное пособие is intended to be a generally understandable and clearly organized outline of historical processes taken place on the present day territory of Kazakhstan since pre-historic time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geobiology and Ecology of Metasequoia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37160841 The Geobiology and Ecology of Metasequoia. Article · January 2005 Source: OAI CITATIONS READS 11 457 3 authors: Ben LePage Christopher J. Williams Pacific Gas and Electric Company Franklin and Marshall College 107 PUBLICATIONS 1,864 CITATIONS 55 PUBLICATIONS 1,463 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Hong Yang Massey University 54 PUBLICATIONS 992 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Conifer (Pinaceae and Cupressaceae (Taxodiaceae)) systematics and phylogeny View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ben LePage on 24 September 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Chapter 1 The Evolution and Biogeographic History of Metasequoia BEN A. LePAGE1, HONG YANG2 and MIDORI MATSUMOTO3 1URS Corporation, 335 Commerce Drive, Suite 300, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, 19034, USA; 2Department of Science and Technology, Bryant University, 1150 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, Rhode Island, 02917, USA; 3Department of Earth Sciences, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 133, Inage-ku, Chiba 263, Japan. 1. Introduction .............................................................. 4 2. Taxonomy ............................................................... 6 3. Morphological Stasis and Genetic Variation ................................. 8 4. Distribution of Metasequoia Glyptostroboides ............................... 10 5. Phytogeography .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Document: Travel Demand Estimations
    Almaty–Bishkek Economic Corridor Almaty-Issyk-Kul Alternative Road EIA Supplementary Document: Travel Demand Estimations 31 October 2020 Prepared for: Asian Development Bank (ADB) Prepared by: EBP (formerly Economic Development Research Group), Boston USA Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. EDR Group / EBP team members: EBP US (formerly EDR Group), USA EBP Schweiz AG ILF Kazakhstan LLC Elvira Ennazarova, Kyrgyz Republic Table of Contents 1 Travel Demand Estimations ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Existing Travel ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Travel Induced by Alternative Road ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Total Travel Demand, Economic Development ...................................................................... 4 1.4 Distribution of Travel Demand ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Fielding
    Travellers in the Great Steppe FROM THE PAPAL ENVOYS TO THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION NICK FIELDING “In writing this book I have tried to explain some of the historical events that have affected those living in the Great Steppe – not an easy task, as there is little study of this subject in the English language. And the disputes between the Russians and their neighbours and between the Bashkirs, the Kazakhs, the Turkomans, the Kyrgyz and the Kalmyks – not to mention the Djungars, the Dungans, the Nogai, the Mongols, the Uighurs and countless others – means that this is not a subject for the faint-hearted. Nonetheless, I hope that the writings referred to in this book have been put into the right historical context. The reasons why outsiders travelled to the Great Steppe varied over time and in themselves provide a different kind of history. Some of these travellers, particularly the women, have been forgotten by modern readers. Hopefully this book will stimulate you the reader to track down some of the long- forgotten classics mentioned within. Personally, I do not think the steppe culture described so vividly by travellers in these pages will ever fully disappear. The steppe is truly vast and can swallow whole cities with ease. Landscape has a close relationship with culture – and the former usually dominates the latter. Whatever happens, it will be many years before the Great Steppe finally gives up all its secrets. This book aims to provide just a glimpse of some of them.” From the author’s introduction. TRAVELLERS IN THE GREAT STEPPE For my fair Rosamund TRAVELLERS IN THE GREAT STEPPE From the Papal Envoys to the Russian Revolution NICK FIELDING SIGNAL BOOKS .
    [Show full text]
  • Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management
    Water Resources Development and Management Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management Series editors Asit K. Biswas, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Cecilia Tortajada, Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Editorial Board Dogan Altinbilek, Ankara, Turkey Francisco González-Gómez, Granada, Spain Chennat Gopalakrishnan, Honolulu, USA James Horne, Canberra, Australia David J. Molden, Kathmandu, Nepal Olli Varis, Helsinki, Finland Hao Wang, Beijing, China [email protected] More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7009 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili • Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia 123 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili and State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Faculty of Geography and Environmental and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sciences Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan and and Research Centre of Ecology and Research Centre of Ecology and Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Almaty Almaty Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Research Centre of Ecology and Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) and Geography, Chinese Academy of U.U. Uspanov Kazakh Research Institute of Sciences Soil Science and Agrochemistry Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan ISSN 1614-810X ISSN 2198-316X (electronic) Water Resources Development and Management ISBN 978-981-13-0928-1 ISBN 978-981-13-0929-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0929-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018943710 © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three — Trade Facilitation 31
    Chapter Three — Trade Facilitation 31 Chapter Three Trade Facilitation ● North-South corridor, which links the Northern Europe countries to the Persian With its common borders with China to the east, Gulf through Russia and Iran via Diny Nur- the Russian Federation to the north, the Caspian peisovoi – Oazis section (806 km), Iletsk – Sea to the west, and Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Aktau section (1,389 km), Kirgilda – Aktau Uzbekistan to the south, Kazakhstan is strategi- section (1,313 km). cally located on the transit route between Europe ● Transport Corridor Europe Caucasus Asia and Asia. Indeed, all of the transport corridors con- (TRACECA), which links Europe and Asia necting Central Asia to Europe pass through Ka- across the Black Sea, the countries of the zakhstan, including the: South Caucasus, the Caspian Sea and the ● Northern Corridor of the Trans-Asian Railway Central Asian countries via the Aktau – (TAR), which links Western Europe to China, Dostyk section (3,836 km). Korean Peninsula and Japan through Russia ● Trade facilitation has been high on the and Kazakhstan via Dostyk – Petropavlovsk government’s agenda since the country’s section (covering 1,910 km), and Dostyk – independence, as a critical element for Aksu section (covering 2,188 km). achieving regional and global integra- ● Southern Corridor of TAR, which links tion. Kazakhstan participates in 13 of the South-Eastern Europe with China and international conventions on infrastruc- Southeast Asia through Turkey, Iran, and ture, transport, border crossing facilitation Kazakhstan via Dostyk – Sary-Agach rail- maintained under UNECE (Table 3.1), and road section (1,831 km). the government has been deregulating international transport services to attract ● Central Asian corridor, which links Central Asia via Russia with the EU countries (Sary- private operators.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Analysis of the Russo-Soviet Anekdot
    A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSO-SOVIET ANEKDOT by Seth Benedict Graham BA, University of Texas, 1990 MA, University of Texas, 1994 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2003 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Seth Benedict Graham It was defended on September 8, 2003 and approved by Helena Goscilo Mark Lipovetsky Colin MacCabe Vladimir Padunov Nancy Condee Dissertation Director ii Copyright by Seth Graham 2003 iii A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSO-SOVIET ANEKDOT Seth Benedict Graham, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2003 This is a study of the cultural significance and generic specificity of the Russo-Soviet joke (in Russian, anekdot [pl. anekdoty]). My work departs from previous analyses by locating the genre’s quintessence not in its formal properties, thematic taxonomy, or structural evolution, but in the essential links and productive contradictions between the anekdot and other texts and genres of Russo-Soviet culture. The anekdot’s defining intertextuality is prominent across a broad range of cycles, including those based on popular film and television narratives, political anekdoty, and other cycles that draw on more abstract discursive material. Central to my analysis is the genre’s capacity for reflexivity in various senses, including generic self-reference (anekdoty about anekdoty), ethnic self-reference (anekdoty about Russians and Russian-ness), and critical reference to the nature and practice of verbal signification in more or less implicit ways. The analytical and theoretical emphasis of the dissertation is on the years 1961—86, incorporating the Stagnation period plus additional years that are significant in the genre’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Water Cycle Management in Kazakhstan
    Integrated Water Cycle Management in Kazakhstan i Integrated Water Cycle Management in Kazakhstan Editors: Burghard C. Meyer Leipzig University, Germany Lian Lundy, Middlesex University, London, UK Textbook developed in the TEMPUS IV – 5th Call of Proposals on Joint Projects Almaty “Qazag university” 2014 Editors: Burghard C. Meyer & Lian Lundy, The publication should be citated as follows Meyer B. C. & L. Lundy (Eds). 2014. Integrated Water Cycle Management in Kazakhstan. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Publishing House, Almaty, 320 pages ISBN: 978-601-04-0900-2 Published with active contributions of the TEMPUS IV IWEB-Project partner’s institutions: Middlesex University, London, UK Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Ahmed Yasawi International Kazak-Turkish University, Turkistan, Kazakhstan Kokshetau State University named after Shokan Ualikhanov, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan Universität Leipzig, Germany Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus Institute of Geography of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan The Regional Environmental Centre for Central Asia, Almaty, Kazakhstan Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Water Economy, Taraz, Kazakhstan Kazakh Research Institute of Fishery, Almaty, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan Institute of Professional Development and Retraining, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science Control Committee, Astana, Kazakhstan Center of Bologna process and academic mobility, Astana, Kazakhstan Fund Zhas Otan, Akmola region, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher, the Editors and Authors by any injury and/or damage to persons or property of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or form any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the materials herein. The authors are responsible for the content of their chapters.
    [Show full text]