Directory of the European Commission
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Western Europe
Western Europe Great Britain National Affairs JL HE DOMINANT EVENT of 1983 was the general election in June, which gave the Conservatives an overall majority of 144 seats. The election results led to the immediate eclipse of Michael Foot as Labor leader and Roy Jenkins as head of the Liberal-Social Democratic alliance; Neil Kinnock took over as Labor head and David Owen as leader of the Social Democrats. The Conservative victory was attributable in part to a fall in the inflation rate; in May it stood at 3.7 per cent, the lowest figure in 15 years. The "Falklands factor" also contributed to the Conserva- tive win, in that the government of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher appeared resolute in the pursuit of its aims. Finally, the Conservative victory owed something to disunity in Labor's ranks. The extreme right-wing parties fielded about 66 per cent fewer candidates in 1983 than in 1979; there were 59 National Front (NF) candidates, 53 British National party candidates (this party had broken away from the NF in 1980), and 14 can- didates belonging to other right-wing groups. The extreme-left Workers' Revolu- tionary party fielded 21 candidates. In October Home Secretary Leon Brittan announced plans to raise the electoral deposit to an "acceptable minimum," thus making it more difficult for extremist candidates to run for office. A report issued in October by the national advisory committee of the Young Conservatives maintained that "extreme and racialist forces are at work inside the Conservative party." Despite this, however, Jacob Gewirtz, director of the Board of Deputies of British Jews' defense and group relations department, indicated in December that in recent years the focus of antisemitism in Britain had shifted dramatically from the extreme right to the extreme left. -
Download (515Kb)
European Community No. 26/1984 July 10, 1984 Contact: Ella Krucoff (202) 862-9540 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: 1984 ELECTION RESULTS :The newly elected European Parliament - the second to be chosen directly by European voters -- began its five-year term last month with an inaugural session in Strasbourg~ France. The Parliament elected Pierre Pflimlin, a French Christian Democrat, as its new president. Pflimlin, a parliamentarian since 1979, is a former Prime Minister of France and ex-mayor of Strasbourg. Be succeeds Pieter Dankert, a Dutch Socialist, who came in second in the presidential vote this time around. The new assembly quickly exercised one of its major powers -- final say over the European Community budget -- by blocking payment of a L983 budget rebate to the United Kingdom. The rebate had been approved by Community leaders as part of an overall plan to resolve the E.C.'s financial problems. The Parliament froze the rebate after the U.K. opposed a plan for covering a 1984 budget shortfall during a July Council of Ministers meeting. The issue will be discussed again in September by E.C. institutions. Garret FitzGerald, Prime Minister of Ireland, outlined for the Parliament the goals of Ireland's six-month presidency of the E.C. Council. Be urged the representatives to continue working for a more unified Europe in which "free movement of people and goods" is a reality, and he called for more "intensified common action" to fight unemployment. Be said European politicians must work to bolster the public's faith in the E.C., noting that budget problems and inter-governmental "wrangles" have overshadolted the Community's benefits. -
The European Commission
The European Commission What is the Commission? An executive cabinet + A bureaucracy Composition: (28 members, 41 DG´s and 36 Agencies) Tasks: legislative (agenda –setting, proposing legislation) executive (regulation, negotiation, administration) Logic of working: (College) Mainly by consensus, but absolute majority if disagreement Name Office Start Commissioner Hallstein I 1958 11 Hallstein II 1962 10 Rey I 1967 15 Malfetti I 1970 8 Mansholt I 1972 9 Ortoli I 1973 14 Jenkins I 1977 13 Thorn I 1981 17 Delors I 1985 18 Delors II 1989 17 Delors III 1993 15 Santer I 1995 18 Prodi I 1999 33 Barroso I 2004 33 Barroso II 2010 27 Juncker 2014 28 Evolution Hallstein Commission 62-67 Delors Commission 85- 89 Juncker Commission 2014-19 European Commission Executive power Political Administrative Agenda-setting Policy implementation Tasks Policy initiative Policy application Policy decision Distribution of public funds External representation Policy supervision Main Functions of the Commission Engine and voice of the EU European regulator European Civil Service European level mediator External representative of the Union The Role of European Commission Role of the Commission Drafting legislation: The Commission is responsible for initiating legislative proposals. It is the only institution with the right to draft legislation. Administration of policies: The Commission manages (some) of the policies of the EU and budget of the EU. Guardian of the Treaties: The Commission supervises the application and of laws (carried out by and within the Member States by governments and other actors). Represenation of the EU in exterior trade. aThe Commision negotiates commerical agreements in the name of the EU with third countries, such as USA or China as well as the WTO. -
IITM Journal of Business Studies (JBS) 2020
Volume 7 Issue 1 January - December 2020 ISSN 2393-9451 Contents 1. An Appraisal Of Prominent Green Marketing 3-13 Communication Themes As Part Of Green marketing Strategies 2. A Study On Impact Of Nursing Staff Turnover On Hospital 14-27 Efficiency At A Trust-Based Hospital, Vadodara 3. A Study On The Importance Of Black Swans And Var 28-39 4. An HR Manager Confronting Challenge Of Change 40-52 (Case Study On Employee Attendance Management) 5. Job Satisfaction Among Employees With Chronic Illness And 53-65 Resultant Work Disability: Effect Of Employer Related Variables 6. Blockchain Solution For Third Party Administrator Process 66-70 In Health Insurance Medical Claims 7. Cluster Development Of MSME Sector In India: 71-76 An Inter-State Analysis 8. Shareholders’ Value Creation In The Sun Pharma-Ranbaxy 77-86 Merger: An Event Study 9. Efficiency Of Indian Stock Market- A Study Of Existence Of 87-98 Arbitrage Gains Through Put Call Parity 10. Electronic Word Of Mouth And Eloquence: 99-104 An Analysis Of Reviews In Hospitality Sector IITM Journal of Business Studies 1 Volume 7 Issue 1 January - December 2020 ISSN 2393-9451 11. Employee Participation In Decision Making And 105-117 Employee Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Role Of Emotional Intelligence 12. Evolving A Pshycometric Instrument To Measure 118-126 Work Life Balance 13. Financial Literacy Leads To Development: 127-140 Mediating Role Of Financial Inclusion, An Empirical Study 14. Flu-Conomics And Its Impact Globally With Special 141-148 Study How To Overstrip From This Grim For India 15. GDS Xerox: Addressing The Right Segment 149-154 16. -
A Competition Cure for a Litigation Disease?
Concurrences Revue des droits de la concurrence Competition Law Journal New frontiers of antitrust Paris, 21 février 2014 Colloque l Concurrences N° 2-2014 www.concurrences.com Nathalie Homobono I Directrice générale, DGCCRF, Paris Frédéric Jenny I Président, Comité concurrence, OCDE I Président, Comité international Concurrences I Professeur d’économie, Co-Directeur CEDE, ESSEC Joaquín Almunia I Vice-Président de la Commission européenne, en charge des affaires de concurrence Laurence Idot I Professeur, Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas, Membre, Autorité de la concurrence, Paris, Présidente, Comité scientifique Revue Concurrences Bill Kovacic I Professeur, George Washington Law School, Washington DC Chris Fonteijn I Président, Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets, La Haye Ali Nikpay I Avocat associé, Gibson Dunn, Londres Joshua Wright I Commissaire, Federal Trade Commission, Washington DC Thomas Graf I Avocat associé, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Bruxelles Bruno Lasserre I Président, Autorité de la concurrence, Paris Peter Freeman I Président, Competition Appeal Tribunal, Londres Andreas Mundt I Président, Bundeskartellamt, Bonn Wouter Wils I Conseiller auditeur, Commission européenne, Bruxelles I Professeur associé, King’s College, Londres Mélanie Thill-Tayara I Avocate associée, Norton Rose Fulbright, Paris Howard A. Shelanski I Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Maison blanche, Washington DC Alexander Italianer I Directeur général, DG Concurrence, Bruxelles Matthew Readings I Avocat associé, Shearman & Sterling, -
Staff Regulations of the European Union
2011/0455 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 336 thereof, Having regard to the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and in particular Article 12 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, submitted following consultation with the Staff Regulations Committee, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national Parliaments, Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice, Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Auditors, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, Whereas: (1) The European Union, and its more than 50 institutions and agencies, should continue to be equipped with a high-quality European public administration, so as to enable it to achieve its objectives, implement its policies and activities and perform its tasks to the highest possible standard in accordance with the Treaties to meet the challenges, both internal and external, that it will face in the future and to serve the citizens of the Union. (2) Consequently, it is necessary to ensure a framework for attracting, recruiting and maintaining highly qualified and multilingual staff, drawn on the widest possible geographical basis from among citizens of the Member States, and with due regard to gender balance, who are independent and adhere to the highest professional standards, and to enable such staff to carry out their duties as effectively and efficiently as possible. -
Recall of Mps
House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Recall of MPs First Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 June 2012 HC 373 [incorporating HC 1758-i-iv, Session 2010-12] Published on 28 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. -
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Establishing a Constitution for Europe during European Union enlargement? Visions of ‘Europe’ in the referenda campaigns in France and the Netherlands Mamadouh, V. DOI 10.1080/08873630903322213 Publication date 2009 Published in Journal of Cultural Geography Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Mamadouh, V. (2009). Establishing a Constitution for Europe during European Union enlargement? Visions of ‘Europe’ in the referenda campaigns in France and the Netherlands. Journal of Cultural Geography, 26(3), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873630903322213 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 This -
NRC Kunnen Referenda Met Propaganda Gekocht Kletser
E T HEM A Van Keerpunt tot Paars Statements. In het thematische deel van Idee wordt in ieder nummer een onderwerp vanuit verschillende invalshoeken onder de loep genomen. De zogenaamde statements 'vertalen' dit onderwerp naar de per soonlijke levenssfeer of vragen naar de persoonlijke opvattingen van betrokkenen bij het thema. Dit keer getuigenissen over het kabinet-Den Uyl en het paarse kabinet van journalist Henk Hof/and, oud-staatssecretaris Laurens Jan Brinkhorst en oud-minister Ruud Lubbers. • D66 IS een geestesgesteldheid enk Hoiland, journalist van NRC kunnen referenda met propaganda gekocht kletser. Den Uyl speelde een dubbele rol: Handelsblad, volgt beroepshalve worden. aan de ene kant was hij een bevlogen man H al decennia lang de ontwikkelin die kleine sigaartjes rookte, aan de andere gen in de Nederlandse politiek. Hij kijkt te k heb nooit geloofd dat het met die pro kant een slimme, harde politicus. Joop rug op de roerige periode van de jaren zestig I gressieve volkspartij iets zou worden. heeft zijn masker laten vallen toen hij, als en zeventig, de rol van D66 daarin en con De doorbraakpartij van vlak na de oorlog gezworen republikein, prins Bernhard uit cludeert dat de partij opnieuw moet worte was toch ook al mislukt? len in de maatschappij van nu. Elke partij is een insti Herik Bojland tuut waarvan mensen af "Ik denk niet dat het kabinet-Den Uyl de hankelijk zijn voor wat politiek vernieuwd heeft. Het heeft juist betreft hun baan en toe duidelijk gemaakt hoe begrensd de moge komst. Voordat je een par lijkheden zijn om via de politiek de maat tij kunt opheffen, moet je schappij te hervonnen. -
European Union Civil Service Law 23/11/2017
6th Annual Conference European Union Civil Service Law Brussels, 23-24 November 2017 European Institute of Public Administration European Centre for Judges and Lawyers Erasmus+ www.eipa.eu For five years, EIPA’s European Centre for Judges and Lawyers (ECJL) in Luxembourg has hosted an annual conference on ‘European Union Civil Service Law’. These conferences have been very well received and prompted much enthusiasm from: Judges from the Court of Justice of the EU; Legal representatives of European institutions and agencies; University professors; Lawyers specialised in this field. In light of this, EIPA will organise a sixth annual conference. This will be an opportunity for you to explore recent developments, and in particular, those related to the reform of the EU’s Court of Justice and the transfer of competence of civil service law to the General Court. What you gain Firstly, you will become informed about recent developments in the case law of the General Court. You will look in more detail at specific issues regarding civil service litigation in the EU, including those issues that are currently on the agenda. Secondly, we will provide scope for a debate and a critical assessment of this case law among the key actors concerned, namely judges, lawyers and staff of the institutions. Who will benefit most? • Civil servants and officials of EU institutions and agencies who are responsible for issues relating to civil service law. • Members of trade unions and professional organisations in the EU. • Lawyers specialised in civil service litigation in the EU. • National experts of public administration. • Officials of international, non-EU organisations who are responsible for staff matters. -
Le Gouvernement 1999
couv_org.xpd 18/11/99 12:50 Page 1 Le duGouvernement Grand-Duché de Luxembourg 19 99 001à004.xpd 18/11/99 12:46 Page 1 En haut, de gauche à droite: M. Joseph Schaack, M. François Biltgen, M. Charles Goerens, Mme Anne Brasseur, M. Henri Grethen, M. Carlo Wagner et M. Eugène Berger En bas, de gauche à droite: M. Luc Frieden, Mme Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, M. Fernand Boden, M. Jean-Claude Juncker, Mme Lydie Polfer, Mme Marie-Josée Jacobs et M. Michel Wolter 002 001à004.xpd 18/11/99 12:46 Page 2 Photos Photothèque S.I.P., Imedia, PDL Photothèque de la Ville de Luxembourg, Serge Waldbillig Layout Christian Coiffard Rédaction Service Information et Presse - Cellule Edition Impression S.C.I.E. 003 004 005à130.xpd 18/11/99 12:52 Page 005 Le duGouvernement Grand-Duché de Luxembourg 19 99 Service Information et Presse du Gouvernement 3, rue du Saint-Esprit L-1475 Luxembourg http://www.gouvernement.lu 005 005à130.xpd 18/11/99 12:52 Page 006 La composition de la Chambre des députés... Elections législatives PARTIS 1945 1948 1951 1954 1959 1964 PCS 25 22 21 26 21 22 POSL 11 15 19 17 17 21 PD 9* 9* 8* 6* 11 6 PC 5 5 4 3 3 5 ADR 1 - - - - - - VERTS 2 - - - - - - GLEI 3 - - - - - - GAP 4 - - - - - - PSD 5 - - - - - - EDF 6 - - - - - - PSI 7 - - - - - - MIP 8 - - - - - 2 PIE 9 1 - - - - - DL 10 - - - - - - TOTAL: 51 51 52 52 52 56 PCS Parti chrétien social POSL Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois PD Parti démocratique * Groupement démocratique PC Parti communiste 1 Aktiounskomitée fir Demokratie a Rentegerechtegkeet ** Comité d'action 5/6 2 Déi Gréng -
Individual Responsibility of Ministers: an Outline of the Issues
The Individual Responsibility of Ministers: An Outline of the Issues Research Paper 96/27 21 February 1996 The individual responsibility of ministers is a vital aspect of accountable and democratic Parliamentary government, yet it is a 'convention' which is difficult to define with certainty and which, to a large degree, depends on the circumstances of each individual case. This Paper seeks to explore, in general terms, the subject as a whole and several interesting examples from the era of Crichel Down in 1954 onwards to illustrate the issue. It does not seek to provide a comprehensive analysis of ministerial responsibility (including collective responsibility) or Parliamentary accountability. Barry K Winetrobe Janet Seaton Home Affairs Section Reference and Reader Services Section House of Commons Library Summary Individual ministerial responsibility is an important if complex constitutional issue. It is often described as a constitutional convention, and this Paper examines its nature in that context, and in relation to collective responsibility and in the light of developments such as the growth of select committees, the development of Next Steps agencies and quangos, and the publication in 1992 of Questions of procedure for Ministers. The nature of individual responsibility in action is described briefly, including aspects short of a ministerial resignation or dismissal. The interesting, if short, debate on ministerial responsibility on 12 February 1996 is considered. A number of modern examples of situations where individual responsibility could be said to have arisen are examined, purely to illustrate various aspects of the 'convention'. It is not intended to be a comprehensive list. It covers significant episodes such as Crichel Down in 1954 (in which Sir David Maxwell Fyfe set out what is often regarded as the classic statement of the traditional doctrine), the Falklands (1982) and Westland (1986), and includes instances where resignation demands were successfully restricted such as Court Line (1975) and the Maze Prison escape (1983).