DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Development and Government in Poland « Defend Your

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Development and Government in Poland « Defend Your Metropolization : Local Development and Government in Poland Lydia COUDROY DE LILLE Université Lumière-Lyon 2 & Centre Géophile - Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Lyon OCDE- International Conference 6-7 June 2005, Trento « Defend your commune ! » Warsaw, before the administrative reform of Warsaw of 2002 (COUDROY, 2002) 1 Introduction • Poland in advance in providing territorial reforms… • …but not in the capital city • The pressures of metropolization : economical concentration and political decentralization • Which consequences on the territorial design ? 1. HESITATIONS ABOUT THE TERRITORIAL FRAMEWORK • Communal model ? The faith in the local tier as a basis for the building of democracy • Metropolitan model ? A large-bounded territory and an urban government above the communes 2 1.1.« Union of communes » (1990-94) • The first step of the territorial and administrative reform : decentralization only at the communal tier • The local autonomy applied to the capital city Administrative structure of the Warsaw Voivodship (1990-94) Tiers of the territorial structure Legislative Executive power power Name Number of Population Name of the Name of the Name of the units (1000) authority authority head of the authority Voivodship 1 2410 _ _ _ (Wojewódtzwo warszawskie) City = Union 1 1655 City council City college City President of communes (rada miasta) (Urząd (Prezydent (Związek miejski) miasta) gmin) Communes 7 1655 Commune Commune Mayor (Gmina) = all together council college (Burmistrz) districts (Rada (Urząd (dzielnica) dzielnicy) dzielnicy) Council : elected by the universal suffrage : indirect suffrage 3 Territorial divisions of Warsaw (1990-94) Map : Coudroy de Lille – UMR 8504 – Géophile, 2004 1.2.The « Warsaw system » (1994-98) • Additional tier : the districts • Unequal system, at the advantage of the inner-city • Increasing territorial fragmentation 4 Administrative structure of the Warsaw Voivodship (1994-98) Tiers Legislative Executive power power Name Number Population Name of the Name of the Name of the (1000) authority authority head of the authority Warsaw 1 2416 - - - voivodship (Województwo Warszawskie) Capital city 1 1655 City council City college City President Warsaw (rada miasta) (zarząd (Prezydent (Miasto stołeczne 68 members miasta) miasta) = Warszawa) Commune 11 1000 in Council of (Gmina) Centrum Centrum the Centrum mayor of the commune Centrum + + commune 10 655 in the 10 commune Commune Mayors of the others councils college other 10 (rada gminy) (zarząd communes gminy) (burmistrz) Districts of the 7 Council of College of Director commune Centrum district District (Dyrektor) (Dzielnica) (rada (Urząd dzielnicy) dzielnicy) Council : elected by the universal suffrage : indirect suffrage Territorial divisions of Warsaw (1994-2001) 5 1.3.The local governement sank into the territorial reform (1998-2002) • One more tier : the powiat • A new region : the Mazowsze Voivodship • Confused reform in Warsaw A larger region around Warsaw 6 Mazowsze and its counties (powiat) Administrative structure of the Warsaw Voivodship (1998-2002) Tier Legislative Executive power power Name Number Population Name of the Name of the Name of the (1000) authority authority head of the authority Mazowsze 1 5065 Voivodship Voivodship Marshal voivodship Council college (Marszałek) (Województwo (Sejmik (Zarząd mazowieckie) wojewódzki) wojewódtzwa) Warsaw 1 1642 County County Starost County council college (Starosta) (Powiat (Rada (Starostwo warszawski) powiatu) powiatowe) City = Union 1 1642 Council of City college President of of communes Warsaw (Zarząd the city (Związek (Rada miasta) miasta) (Prezydent gmin) miasta) = the Centrum 11 1000 Commune Executive commune council of college of mayor of the + Centrum Centrum Centrum 10 other + (Zarząd commune communes 600 together 10 other gminy) (gminy) communal + councils 10 other 10 mayors in (Rada gminy) communal other colleges communes (Burmistrz) Districts in 7 District District District Centrum councils colleges directors (Dzielnica) (Rada (Rada (Dyrektor) Dzielnica) dzielnicy) Council : elected by the universal suffrage : indirect suffrage 7 1.4.The new administrative framework : dilution of communes (2002) • Back to centralism • Personalisation of the Mayor’s election Administrative structure of Warsaw since 2002 Tiers Legislative Executive power Power NUTS Name Number Population Name of the Name of the Name of tiers (1000) authority authority the head of the authority NUTS2 Mazowsze 1 5080 Voivodship Voivodship Marshal voivodship assembly college (Marszałek) (Województwo (Sejmik (Zarząd mawowieckie) wojewódzki) wojewódzki) NUTS3= City of 1 1609 County County President NUTS4= Warsaw council college of Warsaw NUTS5 (Miasto (Rada (Zarząd (Prezydent stołeczne powiatu) miejksi) Warszawy) Warszawa)= 60 members County of Warsaw (Warszawski Powiat)= Commune of Warsaw (Gmina Warszawy) - Districts of 17 1609 District District Mayor Warsaw together council college (Burmistrz) (Dzielnica) (Rada (Zarząd dzielnicy) dzielnicy) Council : elected by the universal suffrage : indirect suffrage 8 Territorial divisions of Warsaw (since 2002) 2.LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND DEVELOPMENT • Warsaw metropolis ? • The ambiguities of local democracy 9 Urban development and territorial framework 1990-94 Emerging of the power of inner-city in an « egalitarian » territorial structure 1994-2002 The choice of territorial structure confirming the leadership of « Centrum » in a contexte of strong metropolization Since 2002 Back to centralization Metropolization without metropolia Back to territorial centralization and to economical growth in Warsaw… ..but were is the metropolitan area ? 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020
    Annex no. 1 to Resolution no. 458/XXII/12 Of the Sejmik of Pomorskie Voivodeship of 24th September 2012 on adoption of Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 GDAŃSK 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OUTPUT SITUATION ………………………………………………………… 6 II. SCENARIOS AND VISION OF DEVELOPMENT ………………………… 18 THE PRINCIPLES OF STRATEGY AND ROLE OF THE SELF- III. 24 GOVERNMENT OF THE VOIVODESHIP ………..………………………… IV. CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES …………………………………………… 28 V. IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM ………………………………………………… 65 3 4 The shape of the Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 is determined by 8 assumptions: 1. The strategy is a tool for creating development targeting available financial and regulatory instruments. 2. The strategy covers only those issues on which the Self-Government of Pomorskie Voivodeship and its partners in the region have a real impact. 3. The strategy does not include purely local issues unless there is a close relationship between the local needs and potentials of the region and regional interest, or when the local deficits significantly restrict the development opportunities. 4. The strategy does not focus on issues of a routine character, belonging to the realm of the current operation and performing the duties and responsibilities of legal entities operating in the region. 5. The strategy is selective and focused on defining the objectives and courses of action reflecting the strategic choices made. 6. The strategy sets targets amenable to verification and establishment of commitments to specific actions and effects. 7. The strategy outlines the criteria for identifying projects forming part of its implementation. 8. The strategy takes into account the specific conditions for development of different parts of the voivodeship, indicating that not all development challenges are the same everywhere in their nature and seriousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Prospects of Tourist Passenger Shipping in the Polish Part of the Vistula Lagoon
    sustainability Article Development Prospects of Tourist Passenger Shipping in the Polish Part of the Vistula Lagoon Krystian Puzdrakiewicz * and Marcin Połom * Division of Regional Development, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gda´nsk, 80-309 Gda´nsk,Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.P.); [email protected] (M.P.) Abstract: The Vistula Lagoon is a cross-border area with high natural values and a developing market of tourist services. Passenger shipping is an important part of local tourism, but ship owners are insufficiently involved in planning processes and their views on creating shipping development are underrepresented. The article aims to compare the vision of the development of passenger shipping in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon between local governments creating the spatial policy and ship owners offering transport services. We have made an attempt to verify the development prospects. The collation of these visions was based primarily on the qualitative analysis of the content of planning and strategic documents (desk research method) and a survey conducted among all six ship owners. Thanks to the comparative analysis, it was possible to show similarities and differences and to indicate recommendations. The paper presents review of the available literature on the subject, thanks to which the research area was identified as unique in Europe. On the one hand, it is a valuable natural area, which is an important tourist destination, on the other hand, there are organizational and infrastructural limitations in meeting the needs of tourists. Then, field research was conducted, unpublished materials were collected, and surveys were conducted with the Citation: Puzdrakiewicz, K.; Połom, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Samorząd Terytorialny W Pigułce System Samorządu W Polsce • GŁÓWNA MISJA: Planowanie I Wspieranie Rozwoju Regionu M.In
    Samorząd terytorialny w pigułce System samorządu w Polsce • GŁÓWNA MISJA: planowanie i wspieranie rozwoju regionu m.in. poprzez wykorzystanie funduszy Województwo europejskich • ORGANY: sejmik województwa (wybieralny, zarząd województwa z marszałkiem na czele • GŁÓWNA MISJA: zapewnienie usług publicznych, których skala przekracza możliwości gminy, np. ochrona zdrowia, szkoły ponadgimnazjalne, Powiat bezpieczeństwo publiczne • ORGANY: rada powiatu (wybieralna), zarząd powiatu ze starostą na czele • GŁÓWNA MISJA: zapewnienie podstawowych usług publicznych – samorząd „pierwszego kontaktu” Gmina • ORGANY: rada gminy i wójt, burmistrz, prezydent miasta (organy wybieralne) Na czym polega Gmina jako podstawowa jednostka samorządu terytorialnego odpowiada za wszystkie misja gminy? sprawy o zasięgu lokalnym, które – zgodnie z założeniami ustawy o samorządzie > gminnym – mogą się przysłużyć „zaspokojeniu zbiorowych potrzeb wspólnoty”. Nawet jeśli prawo wyraźnie nie nakazuje gminom podejmowania określonych działań czy rozwiązywania konkretnych problemów, władze gminy nie mogą tego traktować jako wymówki dla swojej bierności. Gmina powinna aktywnie rozwiązywać problemy mieszkańców! Zgodnie z art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym oraz art. 16 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP mieszkańcy gminy tworzą z mocy prawa wspólnotę samorządową. Celem działań podejmowanych przez gminę powinno być zaspokajanie konkretnych potrzeb danej wspólnoty samorządowej. Na czym polega Powiat został utworzony, aby zarządzać usługami publicznymi, z którymi nie misja powiatu? poradziłyby sobie gminy, szczególnie mniejsze. Dlatego też powiat ponosi > odpowiedzialność za zarządzanie szpitalami, prowadzenie szkół ponadgimnazjalnych, urzędów pracy czy sprawy geodezji. Warto przy tym pamiętać, że wszystkie szczeble samorządu są od siebie niezależne, i tak np. powiat nie jest nadrzędny w stosunku do gmin. Na czym polega Najważniejszym zadaniem województwa jest wspieranie rozwoju całego regionu. misja województwa? W tym celu sejmik przyjmuje strategie opisujące plany rozwoju województwa.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLISH POLICE Collaboration in the Holocaust
    THE POLISH POLICE Collaboration in the Holocaust Jan Grabowski The Polish Police Collaboration in the Holocaust Jan Grabowski INA LEVINE ANNUAL LECTURE NOVEMBER 17, 2016 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, April 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Jan Grabowski THE INA LEVINE ANNUAL LECTURE, endowed by the William S. and Ina Levine Foundation of Phoenix, Arizona, enables the Center to bring a distinguished scholar to the Museum each year to conduct innovative research on the Holocaust and to disseminate this work to the American public. Wrong Memory Codes? The Polish “Blue” Police and Collaboration in the Holocaust In 2016, seventy-one years after the end of World War II, the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs disseminated a long list of “wrong memory codes” (błędne kody pamięci), or expressions that “falsify the role of Poland during World War II” and that are to be reported to the nearest Polish diplomat for further action. Sadly—and not by chance—the list elaborated by the enterprising humanists at the Polish Foreign Ministry includes for the most part expressions linked to the Holocaust. On the long list of these “wrong memory codes,” which they aspire to expunge from historical narrative, one finds, among others: “Polish genocide,” “Polish war crimes,” “Polish mass murders,” “Polish internment camps,” “Polish work camps,” and—most important for the purposes of this text—“Polish participation in the Holocaust.” The issue of “wrong memory codes” will from time to time reappear in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland's Voivodeships and Poviats and the Geographies Of
    Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society 30 (2) · 2016 UniversityStanley of Kentucky,D. Brunn Lexington, USA CracowMarcin University Semczuk of Economics, Poland PedagogicalRafał Koszek, UniversityPoland’s Karolinaof VoivodeshipsCracow, Poland Gołuszka, and Poviats Gabriela and the Bołoz Geographies of Knowledge: Addressing Uneven Human Resources Abstract: - - In a postindustrial economic world, information economies are key components in local, region al and national development. These are service economies, built on the production, consumption and dis semination of information, including education, health care, outsourcing, tourism, sustainability and related- perlinkshuman welfare are electronic services. knowledge We explore data the that geography/knowledge can be mapped to highlight intersections the areas in Poland’sof most and voivodeships least informa and- poviats by using the volumes of information or hyperlinks about selected information economies. Google hy tion about certain subject categories. While some mapping results are expected, such as Warsaw and Krakow, being prominent, in other regions there are unexpected gaps within eastern, northern and southern Poland,- including some places near major metropolitan centers. There is a significant difference between the cities with poviat rights, which stand out in the number of information on items comparing to the poviats that sur round them. The majority of poviats in Mazowieckie voivodeship are surprisingly recognized as core areas onKeywords: the map of knowledge, nevertheless they are considered undeveloped from the economic point of view. Received: Google hyperlinks; human welfare; knowledge economies; knowledge gaps Accepted: 13 January 2016 Suggested 6citation: June 2016 Prace Komisji Geografii przemy- słuBrunn, Polskiego S.D., Semczuk, Towarzystwa M., Koszek, Geograficznego R., Gołuszka, [Studies K., Bołoz of the G.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Europe UNITARY COUNTRY
    Poland EUROPe UNITARY COUNTRY Basic socio-economic indicators Income group - HIGH INCOME: OECD Local currency - Zloty (PLN) Population and geography Economic data AREA: 312 679 km2 GDP: 960.2 billion (current PPP international dollars) i.e. 24 952 dollars per inhabitant (2014) POPULATION: million inhabitants (2014), 38.484 REAL GDP GROWTH: 3.3% (2014 vs 2013) a decrease of 0.0% per year (2010-14) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 9% (2014) 2 DENSITY: 123 inhabitants/km FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, NET INFLOWS (FDI): 17 275 (BoP, current USD millions, 2014) URBAN POPULATION: 60.6% of national population GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION (GFCF): 20% of GDP (2014) CAPITAL CITY: Warsaw (4.5% of national population) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: 0.843 (very high), rank 36 Sources: OECD, Eurostat, World Bank, UNDP, ILO Territorial organisation and subnational government responsibilities MUNICIPAL LEVEL INTERMEDIATE LEVEL REGIONAL OR STATE LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF SNGs 2 478 380 16 2 874 municipalities counties regions (gmina) (powiat) (województwo) Average municipal size: 15 530 inhabitantS Main features of territorial organisation. Poland has a three-tier system of subnational government, enshrined in the Constitution ratified in 1997. The regional level (voivodeships) was created by the 1999 Local Government Organisation Act. The intermediate level is made up of counties which were abolished in 1975 and re-established in 1999. Among the counties, 314 are “rural counties” and 66 are urban municipalities with county status. Having more than 100 000 inhabitants, they exercise both municipal and county responsibilities. Municipalities, re-established in 1990, are divided into three categories: urban municipalities, rural municipalities and mixed municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Societies East European Politics &
    East European Politics & Societies http://eep.sagepub.com Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder East European Politics and Societies 2007; 21; 424 DOI: 10.1177/0888325407303786 The online version of this article can be found at: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/3/424 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: American Council of Learned Societies Additional services and information for East European Politics & Societies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/3/424 Downloaded from http://eep.sagepub.com at Glasgow University Library on January 9, 2009 Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder* This article examines Poland’s process of regionalization since the late 1990s. It identifies several factors that led Poland to introduce self-government at the regional level both earlier and to a greater extent than its neighbors in East Central Europe. The analysis then turns to the competences and financing of the Polish regions, or voivodeships. Although Poland has taken steps to decentralize, it remains a unitary state. Keywords: Poland; decentralization; regionalization; regions; self-government In 1998, the Poles elected members of new regional councils, fol- lowed by the Czechs in 2000, and the Slovaks in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Sifting Poles from Germans? Ethnic Cleansing and Ethnic Screening In
    Sifting Poles from Germans? Ethnic Cleansing and Ethnic Screening in Upper Silesia, 1945–1949 Author(s): HUGO SERVICE Reviewed work(s): Source: The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 88, No. 4 (October 2010), pp. 652-680 Published by: the Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41061897 . Accessed: 25/08/2012 13:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Slavonic and East European Review. http://www.jstor.org SEER, Vol. 88, No. 4, October2010 SiftingPoles fromGermans? Ethnic Cleansingand EthnicScreening in Upper Silesia,1 945-1 949 HUGO SERVICE I The ethniccleansing which engulfedCentral and EasternEurope in the firsthalf of the twentiethcentury was oftena matterof indiscrimi- nate expulsionin whichlittle or no timewas takento reflecton the culturalidentity of the victims.Yet not all of it was carriedout in this manner.The occupiersand governmentswhich implementedethnic cleansingpolicies in Poland and Czechoslovakiaduring and afterthe Second World War came to the conclusionthat there were many inhabitantsof the territoriesthey wished to 'cleanse' who could not be instantlyrecognized as belongingto one nationalgroup or another.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform in Eastern Europe
    Land Reform in Eastern Europe Western CIS, Transcaucuses, Balkans, and EU Accession Countries Renee Giovarelli David Bledsoe Seattle, Washington October 2001 This paper was prepared under contract with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The positions and opinions presented are those of the author alone, and are not intended to represent the views of FAO. The Rural Development Institute (RDI), located in Seattle, Washington, USA, is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation. RDI is a unique organization of lawyers devoted to problems of land reform and related issues in less developed countries and transitional economies. RDI’s goal is to assist in alleviating world poverty and instability through land reform and rural development. RDI staff have conducted field research and advised on land reform issues in 35 countries in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. For more information about RDI, visit the RDI web site at <www.rdiland.org>. Renee Giovarelli is a staff attorney at RDI and the Director of RDI’s Kyrgyzstan and Women & Land Programs. David Bledsoe is a staff attorney and Deputy Director of Administration at RDI. This report was prepared for submission to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The authors express their appreciation for the valuable input provided by Roy Prosterman, Leonard Rolfes, and Robert Mitchell. The authors would also like to acknowledge the important contributions of the following RDI Research Assistants to the preparation of this report: Laura Gerber, Oesa Glick, Devon Shannon, Kallie Szczepanski, and Alethea Williams. i Executive Summary The former socialist countries of Eastern Europe (that is, Europe east of Germany and west of the Urals, but including all of Russia) began a transition to a market economy in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Health Sector Reform in Poland
    Notes on Health Sector Reform in Poland Peter Berman Associate Professor of International Health Economics Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115, USA Andrzej Rys Director of Health Department, City of Krakow Krakow, Poland Marc Roberts Professor of Political Economy and Health Policy Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115 Paul Campbell Lecturer on Management Department of Health Policy and Management Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115, USA Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 Issues in Health Insurance ...................................................................................................... 2 National Health Insurance (NHI) as an Engine of Reform: ...................................................... 2 Creating The Conditions for Successful Health Financing Reform ...................................... 5 Looking Beyond Health Insurance: Strategies for Transition: .................................................. 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction Since the early 1990’s Poland has been seeking political consensus on a sound strategy for transforming the health care system in the new market economy. The Harvard-Jagiellonian Consortium for Health (Consortium) has been requested to contribute views on the current health reform strategies. This note provides
    [Show full text]
  • Prezentacja Programu Powerpoint
    African swine fever in Poland – update General Veterinary Inspectorate 11 December 2018 Update on epizootic situation in pigs ASF outbreaks in pigs in 2018 1 January – 23 November 2018: 109 ASF outbreaks in pigs The last outbreak was confirmed on 19 September in backyard holding in the area listed in Part III of the Annex to CID 2014/709/EU In total 213 outbreaks since the first one in 2014 Update on epizootic situation in wild boar ASF cases in wild boar in 2018 1 January – 10 December 2018: 2286 ASF cases in wild boar In total 3190 cases since the first one on 17 February 2014 (10 December 2018) The cases of the ASF, there were confirmed in Part 1 or in Part 2 near the border with Part I of the Annex of CID 2014/709/UE, last amendment CID 2018/1856 3143 case of ASF (2018/2239) 1 shot wild boar (female, 1 y.o.) confirmed on 30.11.18. (part 1, Lubelskie Region) The results from NVRI: RT-PCR- /Elisa+, IPT+. The distance from nearest case of ASF- app.19 km. (2542 case of ASF - 1 dead wild boar, confirmed on 17.07.2018; RT-PCR+) The proposal of changes of the Annex to CID 2014/709 Enlargement of part 2: - municipality Werbkowice in hrubieszowski district - municipality Tyszowce and - part of municipality of Łaszczów North from the road no. 852 in tomaszowski district. Enlargement of Part 1: - municipality Rachanie in tomaszowski district. 3170 case of ASF (2018/2266) 1 shot wild boar (female, 2 y.o.) confirmed on 05.12.18 (Warmińsko – Mazurskie Region, part 1) The results from NVRI: RT-PCR+ The distance from nearest case of ASF –app.14 km.
    [Show full text]
  • The Łódź Atlas
    THE ŁÓDŹ ATLAS a higher development standard at least for having trees planted on the sides, or for the neat Literature architectural designs of the buildings (Pasaż Meyera). One characteristic feature of the city’s B a d z i a k K., 1976, Geneza i rozwój łódzkiego węzła komunikacyjnego (do 1914 r.), Rocznik Łódzki, t. XXI (XXIV). development was that there were built up the street frontages, which practice had already Sheet V: Łódź in the high industrial period Bogusz A., 1993, Fabryczne Kluby Sportowe Łodzi , Muzeum Sportu i Turystyki, Łódź. commenced in the first half of 19th century, that the municipal rights granted to the artisan Bogusz A., 1992, Niemieckie Stowarzyszenia Sportowe Łodzi 1824–1939, Muzeum Sportu i Turystyki, V settlements did not at all envisage: first in the streets perpendicular to Piotrkowska Street, Łódź. Jacek Wesołowski and then in those parallel to it. In this way created were divided configurations of secondary Bogusz A., 1992, Żydowskie Stowarzyszenia Sportowe Łodzi 1897–1939, Muzeum Sportu i Turystyki, Łódź. Lasociń s k i D., B o n i s ł awski R., Koliń s k i M., 2001, Łódź – przewodnik, Piątek Trzynaste- building plots that were perpendicular to the original extended plots. One important central go, Łódź. city street that waited to be developed until the 1880’s was Dzika Street which the planners Dzieje Żydów w Łodzi 1820–1944. Wybrane problemy, 1991, red. W. P u ś i S. L i s z e w s k i, Łódź. In the period between 1850 and 1914 under study in this sheet V, Łódź evolved from tried to give a noble character by locating there a public park and a middle school building, Elektrownia Łódzka 1907–1932, 1932, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Elektryczne SA, Łódź.
    [Show full text]