DOCSLIB.ORG

Provenance Study of the Early Iron Age Knobbed Ware in Troia, NW Turkey and the Balkans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Provenance Study of the Early Iron Age Knobbed Ware in Troia, NW Turkey and the Balkans Provenance study of the Early Iron Age Knobbed ware in Troia, NW Turkey and the Balkans. Petrographic and geochemical evidence Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften der Geowissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen vorgelegt von Farkas Pintér aus Budapest 2005 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. 07. 2005 Dekan: Prof. Klaus G. Nickel, Ph.D. 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Muharrem Satır 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Ernst Pernicka 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 7 Zusammenfassung 9 Összefoglalás 11 Acknowledgements 13 1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE 16 2. IMPORTANCE AND AIM OF THE STUDY 21 3. OVERVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS RESEARCH IN POTTERY ANALYSES 22 3.1. Archaeometrical ceramic studies in Troia 25 4. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS 26 4.1. Sampling 26 4.2. Analytical methods 30 4.2.1. Mineral separation 31 4.2.2. Petrographic analyses and cathodoluminescence investigation (CL) 32 4.2.3. X-ray diffractometry (XRD) 36 4.2.4. X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) 38 4.2.5. Radiogenic isotopes (87Sr/86Sr, 143Nd/144Nd) 42 4.2.6. Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) 45 4.2.7. Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) 46 5. MAIN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE STUDY AREAS 47 5.1. Introduction 47 5.2. The Troad 48 5.3. The Avşa Island and surrounding areas 51 5.4. The Thrace basin and its southern coast at the Sea of Marmara 51 (Menekşe Çataği) 5.5. The south-western Strandja Massive (north Turkish Thrace and 53 Ovcarovo) 5.6. The south-eastern Rhodope Mts. (Chal) 55 5.7. The southern Balkanides (Diadovo, Pshenitsevo, and Kirilovo) 57 5.8. The north-eastern Moesian platform (Sborianovo) 59 6. RESULTS 62 6.1. Petrography, mineralogy and phase analysis 62 6.1.1. Petrographic analysis of the sherds and comparative materials 62 6.1.1.1. Troia 65 6.1.1.1.1. Petrography of the comparative materials 65 6.1.1.1.2. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 1 68 6.1.1.2. The Avşa Island 77 6.1.1.2.1. Petrography of the sherd; Petrographic group 2 77 6.1.1.3. Menekşe Çataği East (MCE) and West (MCW) 78 6.1.1.3.1. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 3 78 6.1.1.4. North Turkish Thrace 83 6.1.1.4.1. Petrography of the comparative material 83 6.1.1.4.2. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 4 83 6.1.1.5. Ovcarovo 88 6.1.1.5.1. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 5 88 4 6.1.1.6. Chal 90 6.1.1.6.1. Petrography of the comparative material 90 6.1.1.6.2. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 6 90 6.1.1.7. Diadovo, Pshenitsevo, and Kirilovo 92 6.1.1.7.1. Petrography of the comparative materials 92 6.1.1.7.2. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 7 92 6.1.1.8. Sborianovo 96 6.1.1.8.1. Petrography of the sherds; Petrographic group 8 96 6.1.2. Cathodoluminescence investigation 97 6.1.3. X-ray diffractometry 98 6.1.3.1. Sherds from Troia (TR-7, 12, 19, and 25) 99 6.1.3.2. Sherds from the Avşa Island and Menekşe Çataği (A-1, MCW-6, and MCE-1) 100 6.1.3.3. Sherds from north Turkish Thrace (AT-2, DH-2, HM, and YK-3) 100 6.1.3.4. Sherds from Chal (CH-1 and 3) 101 6.1.3.5. Sherds from Ovcarovo and Sborianovo (OVC-1, 4, and SBO-3) 102 6.1.3.6. Sherds from Diadovo, Pshenitsevo and Kirilovo 103 (DIA-6, 13, PSH-2, and KIR-2) 6.2. Geochemical analyses 104 6.2.1. Geochemical composition of comparative sediments and the sherds 104 6.2.1.1. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Troia 106 6.2.1.2. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Menekşe Çataği 113 6.2.1.3. Comparative sediments and the sherds from north Turkish Thrace 116 6.2.1.4. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Ovcarovo 119 6.2.1.5. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Chal 121 6.2.1.6. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Diadovo-Pshenitsevo, and Kirilovo 123 6.2.1.7. Comparative sediments and the sherds from Sborianovo 126 6.2.2. Radiogenic isotopes 128 6.2.2.1. Troia 128 6.2.2.2. Menekşe Çataği 129 6.2.2.3. North Turkish Thrace 129 6.2.2.4. Chal 129 6.2.2.5. Diadovo-Pshenitsevo 130 6.2.2.6. Sborianovo 131 6.2.3. Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) 132 6.2.3.1. Sample MCE-1 (Menekşe Çataği) 132 6.2.3.2. Sample AT-2 (north Turkish Thrace) 134 6.2.4. Neutron activation analysis (NAA) 139 6.2.4.1. The sherd from Troia (Tr-20) 139 6.2.4.2. Intermediate volcanite fragments from the sherd MCE-1 and the rock sample Mc-8 (Menekşe Çataği) 140 7. SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS 142 7.1. The origin of the Knobbed ware 143 7.1.1. Summary and interpretation of the petrographic and cathodoluminescence results 143 7.1.1.1. Troia 143 7.1.1.2. The Avşa Island 146 7.1.1.3. Menekşe Çataği 147 7.1.1.4. North Turkish Thrace 148 7.1.1.5. Ovcarovo 148 5 7.1.1.6. Chal 149 7.1.1.7. Diadovo-Pshenitsevo, Kirilovo 149 7.1.1.8. Sborianovo 150 7.1.2. Summary and interpretation of the chemical data of comparative sediments and the sherds 151 7.1.2.1. Troia 151 7.1.2.2. Menekşe Çataği 155 7.1.2.3. North Turkish Thrace 156 7.1.2.4. Ovcarovo 158 7.1.2.5. Chal 159 7.1.2.6. Diadovo-Pshenitsevo, Kirilovo 160 7.1.2.7. Sborianovo 161 7.1.3. Summary and interpretation of the radiogenic isotope results 163 7.1.4. Summary and interpretation of the EMPA results 166 7.1.5. Summary and interpretation of the NAA results 168 7.1.6. The grouping of the sherds on the basis of their origin 169 7.2. The production technology of the Knobbed ware 170 7.2.1. Possible raw materials used for the pottery production 170 7.2.2. Firing atmosphere of the sherds 172 7.2.3. Maximum firing temperatures of the sherds 173 8. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 176 8.1. General conclusions 176 8.2. Archaeological discussion of the results 178 8.3. General observations concerning the provenance analysis of coarse wares 179 8.4. Open questions resulting from this study 180 LITERATURE 182 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Archaeological description and photographs of the sherds from Troia, Chal, Diadovo, Pshenitsevo, and Kirilovo. 192 Appendix 2. Geological samples analysed in this study. 200 Appendix 3. Petrographic modal composition of the Knobbed ware sherds analysed in this study 202 Appendix 4. Textural features of the Knobbed ware sherds analysed in this study 205 Appendix 5. Measured elements, number of the standards applied, standard deviation (3σ), detection limit, and standard concentrations of the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis 211 Appendix 6. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) data of geological samples 212 Appendix 7. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) data of the sherds 214 Appendix 8. Radiogenic isotope data of geological samples and the sherds analysed in this study 217 Appendix 9. Data of the electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) of the sherds MCE-1 and AT-2 218 Appendix 10. Data of the neutron activation analysis (NAA) of the sherd TR-20, the volcanite fragments in the sherd MCE-1, and the basalt sample Mc-8 220 Curriculum vitae 221 6 7 Summary At the beginning of the Early Iron Age in Troia, in the settlement phase VIIb2 (ca. 1100-1000 B.C.), new vessel forms (Knobbed ware or in German Buckelkeramik) of hand-made pottery appeared. The same vessel forms, with similar decoration can be found in several archaeological localities in Turkish Thrace and the Balkans (Bulgaria, SE-Romania). In this geoarchaeological work the primary question is whether there is a possible common origin of the pottery from different regions? Was the Knobbed ware in Troia transported from the Balkans, or do we have to do it with transfer of technological solutions, and the vessels were made on the spot from local material? Moreover, which raw materials and technique (firing temperatures, etc.) were used in producing the ceramics? In order to answer these questions samples of 90 ceramic fragments and 69 comparative geological materials (clayey, silty, sandy sediments, rock fragments, etc.) have been collected from the most important archaeological sites and survey areas of the occurrence of the Knobbed ware: Troia, the Avşa Island, Menekşe Cataği, north Turkish Thrace (near Edirne) in Turkey, and Chal, Ovcarovo, Diadovo, Pshenitsevo, Kirilovo, and Sborianovo in Bulgaria. A complex analytical procedure employed in this study included optical microscopy (petrographic modal and cathodoluminescence), chemical (XRF, NAA, EMPA) radiogenic isotopes of 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd, and XRD (X-ray diffractometry) analyses. In the first step the sherds have been grouped into eight petrographic groups and several subgroups based on their non-plastic inclusion (temper) composition. Using the major and trace elements Mg, K, Rb, Ba, Sr, Nb, Ti, Y, Zr, Fe, V, Cr and Ni, bivariate plots and PAAS-normalised (post-Archaean average Australian Shale) multi-element diagrams were edited in order to determine the local sediment patterns of the different areas based on clayey and sandy sediments (local reference materials), sampled near the archaeological sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Denizcilik Arkeolojisi Dergisi Maritime Archaeology Periodical
    UMBER: 9 N URK.ORG T YI / A WWW.TINA TINA 2018 - S Denizcilik Arkeolojisi Dergisi Maritime Archaeology Periodical Neolitik DöNeme ait balık kaNcaları, tatlısu-ÇiftlikDüzü. Neolıthıc fıshhooks, tatlısu-ÇiftlikDüzü excavatıoN. TINA TINA Denizcilik Arkeolojisi Dergisi Denizcilik Arkeolojisi Dergisi tInA tÜrKİYe SuALtI ArKeOLOJİSİ VAKFI K u r u L u Ş u: 1999 yılında bir grup denizsever iş adamı tarafından kurulmuştur. A M A C I l Türkiye ve denizlerimizdeki arkeolojik zenginlikleri dünya kamuoyu ve bilimsel kurumlara anlatmak. Bu meyanda yurtiçi ve yurtdışı yayınlar, konferanslar, paneller, seminerler, açık oturumlar, sempozyumlar, kurslar, fuarlar, şenlikler, sergiler, festivaller, toplu inceleme gezi- leri gibi sanatsal etkinlikler ve toplantılar düzenlemek. l T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı izni ve denetimi altında yapılacak olan araştırma, kazı, konservas- yon ve sergileme faaliyetlerinde bulunan yurt içi ve yurt dışı bilimsel kuruluşlara, müzelere, üniversitelere destek sağlamak ve sağlanmasına yardımcı olmak. l T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı izni ve denetimi altında karasularımızda bilimsel metodlar ile günü- müz teknolojik imkanları nispetinde sualtı araştırmaları ve kazıları yapmak. Sualtı arkeolojik eserlerimizi tespit etmek, mevkilerini gerekli mercilere bildirerek korunma- ya alınmalarını sağlamak. l Hali hazırda bu konuda faaliyet gösteren müze ve kuruluşlar ile işbirliği yapmak ve bunlara destek sağlamak. Bu tip müzelerin ve kültürel faaliyetlerin çoğalmasını sağlamak, yeni giri- şimlere fırsat verecek önlemleri almak. l Bu meyanda denizlerimizde görülen ve hızla yayılmakta olan sualtı kirliliğini önleyici tedbirler almak, alınmasını sağlamak ve bu konuda diğer kuruluşlar ile işbirliği sağlamak. l Vakıf amaç ve çalışma konularındaki eğitim ve öğretim kurumlarını geliştirmek ve bu amaçla öğrenciler yetiştirmek için burslar vermek. Y Ö n e t İ m: b A Ş K A n H.
    [Show full text]
  • C02 Emissions and Geological Storage Options in Bulgaria
    Slovak Geo! Mag. 2008, 43 - 52 C02 Emissions and Geological Storage Options in Bulgaria G. Georgiev Sofia University, Depart, of Geology, 15 Tzar Osvoboditel blvd, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] Abstract. In C02 emissions inventory for Bulgaria are included all 42 large industrial sources (>0.1 Mt/year). The Energy sector gives the largest portion of country C02 emissions - 33.7 Mt/y or almost 65 %. The ther- mal power plants produced 25.3 Mt/y (48.5 %) and combined power & heating plants - 8.4 Mt/y (16.1 %). In the country there are 4 zones with a high concentration of industrial C02 sources and emissions - they pro- duced totally 46 Mt/y C02 which equates to 88 % of all industrial C02 emissions. The large presence of thick sedimentary succession and the high exploration rate of Northern Bulgaria are favourable preconditions for assessment of C02 storage opportunities and development of C02 storage activi- ties. In Southern Bulgaria the sedimentary spreading is restricted in area and thickness and related with nu- merous small intra-mountain young basins. The presented Bulgarian C02 storage capacity estimation is based on large data base, including mainly original seismic and borehole results, integrated with our knowledge on the subsurface and with a unified way of calculating the capacity in HC fields, aquifers and coal beds, accepted in the frame of EU GeoCapacity project. The largest capacity of potential C02 storage options in Bulgaria related with aquifers, coal fields have considerably less opportunities, while the possibilities to use depleted hydrocarbon fields practically there are not. The main problem for the C02 geological storage in Bulgarian is that the selected and estimated country storage options are located far from major C02 sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt: an Overview of the Main Features
    GEOLOGICA BALCANICA, 42. 1 – 3, Sofia, Dec. 2013, p. 29-47. The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt: an overview of the main features Dian Vangelov1, Yanko Gerdjikov1, Alexandre Kounov2, Anna Lazarova3 1Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] 2Geological-Paleontological Institute, Geoscience Department, Basel University; e-mail: [email protected] 3Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] (Accepted in revised form: November 2013) Abstract. The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt is a part of the northern branch of the Alpine-Himalayan orogen in the Balkan Peninsula and represents a Tertiary structure developed along the southern margin of the Moesian Platform. The thrust belt displays of two clearly distinct parts: an eastern one dominated exclusively by thin-skinned thrusting and a western part showing ubiquitous basement involvement. A wide transitional zone is locked between both parts where the structural style is dominantly thin-skinned, but with significant pre-Mesozoic basement involvement in the more internal parts. For the western thick-skinned part the poorly developed syn-orogenic flysch is a characteristic feature that along with the very restricted development of foreland basin suggests a rather limited orogenic shortening compared to the eastern part of the belt. The Tertiary Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt originated mainly through a basement- driven shortening and this is explained by the occurrence of compatibly oriented reactivated basement weak zones of pre-Carboniferous, Jurassic and Early Cretaceous ages. The proposed re-definition of the Balkan thrusts system and internal structure of the allochthons also call for significant re-assessment of the existing schemes of tectonic subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • James Hutton's Reputation Among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    The Geological Society of America Memoir 216 Revising the Revisions: James Hutton’s Reputation among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries A. M. Celâl Şengör* İTÜ Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü ve Maden Fakültesi, Jeoloji Bölümü, Ayazağa 34469 İstanbul, Turkey ABSTRACT A recent fad in the historiography of geology is to consider the Scottish polymath James Hutton’s Theory of the Earth the last of the “theories of the earth” genre of publications that had begun developing in the seventeenth century and to regard it as something behind the times already in the late eighteenth century and which was subsequently remembered only because some later geologists, particularly Hutton’s countryman Sir Archibald Geikie, found it convenient to represent it as a precursor of the prevailing opinions of the day. By contrast, the available documentation, pub- lished and unpublished, shows that Hutton’s theory was considered as something completely new by his contemporaries, very different from anything that preceded it, whether they agreed with him or not, and that it was widely discussed both in his own country and abroad—from St. Petersburg through Europe to New York. By the end of the third decade in the nineteenth century, many very respectable geologists began seeing in him “the father of modern geology” even before Sir Archibald was born (in 1835). Before long, even popular books on geology and general encyclopedias began spreading the same conviction. A review of the geological literature of the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries shows that Hutton was not only remembered, but his ideas were in fact considered part of the current science and discussed accord- ingly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ponto-Caspian Basin As a Final Trap for Southeastern Scandinavian Ice-Sheet Meltwater
    Quaternary Science Reviews 148 (2016) 29e43 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev The Ponto-Caspian basin as a final trap for southeastern Scandinavian Ice-Sheet meltwater * Alina Tudryn a, , Suzanne A.G. Leroy b, Samuel Toucanne c, Elisabeth Gibert-Brunet a, Piotr Tucholka a, Yuri A. Lavrushin d, Olivier Dufaure a, Serge Miska a, Germain Bayon c a GEOPS, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Universite Paris-Saclay, Rue du Belvedere, Bat.^ 504-509, 91405, Orsay, France b Environmental Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, London, UK c Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Unite de Recherche Geosciences Marines, F-29280, Plouzane, France d Geological Institute (GIN), Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 117036, Russia article info abstract Article history: This paper provides new data on the evolution of the Caspian Sea and Black Sea from the Last Glacial Received 23 December 2015 Maximum until ca. 12 cal kyr BP. We present new analyses (clay mineralogy, grain-size, Nd isotopes and Received in revised form pollen) applied to sediments from the river terraces in the lower Volga, from the middle Caspian Sea and 23 June 2016 from the western part of the Black Sea. The results show that during the last deglaciation, the Ponto- Accepted 29 June 2016 Caspian basin collected meltwater and fine-grained sediment from the southern margin of the Scandi- navian Ice Sheet (SIS) via the Dniepr and Volga Rivers. It induced the deposition of characteristic red- brownish/chocolate-coloured illite-rich sediments (Red Layers in the Black Sea and Chocolate Clays in Keywords: Caspian sea the Caspian Sea) that originated from the Baltic Shield area according to Nd data.
    [Show full text]
  • Astacus Leptodactylus) Acclimated to Three Different Temperatures
    LIMNOFISH-Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research 5(1): 1-5 (2019) Thermal Tolerance of Turkish Crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) Acclimated to Three Different Temperatures Abdullatif ÖLÇÜLÜ 1* , Metin KUMLU 2 , H. Asuman YILMAZ 2 , O. Tufan EROLDOĞAN 2 1Fisheries Faculty, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey 2Fisheries Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO Critical thermal maxima (CTMax) and minima (CTMin) were determined for RESEARCH ARTICLE Turkish crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) acclimated to 15, 20 and 25°C. CTMin and CTMax were 1.3, 1.1 and 2.0°C, and 37.4, 37.5 and 38.7°C, respectively. Received : 11.05.2018 Thermal tolerance tests showed that acclimation temperatures (15, 20 and 25C) Revised : 05.10.2018 had significant effects on CTMin values of A. leptodactylus (P≤0.05). The area of Accepted : 04.11.2018 thermal tolerance assessed using the CTMin and CTMax boundaries were 2 calculated as 364°C . The overall ARR values were calculated as 0.07 for CTMin Published : 25.04.2019 and 0.13 for CTMax values between 15 and 25 C acclimation tempera-tures. All DOI:10.17216/LimnoFish.422903 the crayfish crumpled at 0.5°C and showed overall spasm at 32.0 – 33.0°C. Farming A. leptodactylus in the southeastern part of the Mediterranean region may be practiced in terms of temperature tolerance. * CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Keywords: A. leptodactylus, CTMin, CTMax, thermal polygon, the acclimation [email protected] Phone : +90 428 213 17 94 response ratio Üç Farklı Sıcaklığa Alıştırılan Türk Kereviti (Astacus leptodactylus)’nin Sıcaklık Toleransı Öz: 15, 20 ve 25 °C’ye alıştırılan Türk kereviti için kritik termal maksima (CTMax) ve minima (CTMin) değerleri belirlenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • References Preface, Chapters 1, 2 and 3
    References Preface, Chapters 1, 2 and 3 Acosta J, Munoz A, Herranz P,Palomo C, Ballesteros M, Vaquero Beghein C, Resovsky JS, Trampert J (2002) P and S tomography M,Uchupi E (2002) Geodynamics of the Emile Baudot Escarp­ using normal-mode and surface waves data with a neighbour­ ment and the Balearic Promontory, western Mediterranean. hood algorithm. Geophys J Int 149:646-658 Mar Petrol GeoI18:349-369 Belousov VV,Volvovsky BS,Arkhipov IV,Buryanov VB,Evsyukov Aksu AE, Hiscott RN, Yasar D, Isler FI, Marsh S (2002a) Seismic YD, Goncharov VP, Gordienko VV, Ismagilov DF, Kislov GK, stratigraphy of Late Quaternary deposits from the southwest­ Kogan Ll,Kondyurin AV, Kozlov VN,Lebedev Ll, Lokholatnikov ern Black Sea shelf: evidence for non catastrophic variation in VM, Malovitsky YP, Moskalenko VN, Neprochnov YP, Ostisty sea level during the last 10.000 yr. Mar GeoI190:6-94 BK,Rusakov OM,Shimkus KM,Shlezinger AE,SochelnicovVV, Aksu AE et al. (2002b) Persistent Holocene outflow from the Black Sollogub VB, Solovyev VD, Starostenko VI, Starovoitov AF, Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean contradicts Noah's flood hy­ Terechov AA, Volvovsky IS, Shigunov AS, Zolotarev VG (1988) pothesis. GSA Today 12:4-10 Structure and evolution of the Earth's crust and upper mantle Aldinucci M, Cirilli S, Costantini A, Decandia FAet al. (2001) Stra­ of the Black Sea. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata 30: tigraphic-structural evolution of the Late Paleozoic-Triassic 109-196 sequences of southern Tuscany (northern Apennines). Diparti­ Bernier P,Berne S,Rabineau M,Thollet G (2004) Last Glacial maxi­ mento di Scienze della Terra, Siena University, 72 pp mum shoreline position in the Gulf of Lions determined by Alleman F (2002) Erlauterungen zur Geologischen Karte des Fur­ lithified coastal sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of the Serbo-Macedonian Unit Concept: from Cadomian Towards Alpine Tectonic Frameworks
    GEOLOŠKI ANALI BALKANSKOGA POLUOSTRVA Volume 81 (1), July 2020, 41–66 – https://doi.org/10.2298/GABP191018004S Review Paper Прегледни рад 60 years of the Serbo-Macedonian Unit concept: From Cadomian towards Alpine tectonic frameworks 1 2 ArKO PAHić iVADAr AUDenyi D S & T G Abstract. The study represents a summary of the hitherto tectonic concepts revolving around a peri-Gondwanan fragment referred to as the Serbo- Macedonian Unit. The Serbo-Macedonian Unit as a gneiss-dominated basement segment is positioned in the proximity of the Baltican craton (peri-Moesian realm). This area represents a repository of the transferred broadly similar thus highly complex, elongated polycrystalline vestiges of the Pan-African inheritance. This peculiar far-travelled composite crustal fragment of north Gondwana is amalgamated on top of the Supragetic unit during the late Variscan peri-Moesian amalgamation. However, the original early Pa - leozoic tectonostratigraphic configuration of these three intimate green schist- and medium- to high-grade gneiss-amphibolite basement vestiges (Serbo-Ma - cedonian/Supragetic and Getic) is further perplexed by the presence of poorly documented pre-Variscan (Ordovician?) lithospheric-scale event. Key words: The Pan-African to Lower Paleozoic subduction/magmatic arc stage led to the Serbo-Macedonian Unit, amalgamation, breakup and dispersal of a cluster of peri-Gondwanan conti- “Lower Complex”, Supragetic nental and oceanic terranes. Breakup and dispersal from the northern shore basement/”Vlasina Complex”, of the Gondwanan active margin triggered the development of the Paleozoic geotectonic subdivision, deep-marine sedimentary cover (“Kučaj unit” or Getic unit). To make matter Peri-Gondwana Cadomian margin, more complex, prior the Lower Paleozoic terrane agglomeration and sub - Lower Paleozoic tectonic event.
    [Show full text]
  • International Commission on the History of Geological Sciences INHIGEO ANNUAL RECORD
    International Commission on the History of Geological Sciences INHIGEO ANNUAL RECORD I No. 48 Covering activitiesI generally in 2015 Issued in 2016 INHIGEO is A Commission of the International Union of Geological Sciences & An affiliate of the International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Compiled and Edited by Wolf Mayer INHIGEO Editor Printed in Canberra on request Available at www.inhigeo.org 1 | P a g e ISSN 1028-1533 International Commission on the History of Geological Sciences INHIGEO ANNUAL RECORD I No. 48 Covering activitiesI generally in 2015 Issued in 2016 INHIGEO is A Commission of the International Union of Geological Sciences & An affiliate of the International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Compiled and Edited by Wolf Mayer INHIGEO Editor Printed in Canberra on request Available at www.inhigeo.org 2 | P a g e CONTENTS INHIGEO Annual Record No. 48 (Published in June 2016 and covering events generally in 2015) INHIGEO BOARD 6 MESSAGES TO MEMBERS President‘s Message: Kenneth L. Taylor 7 Secretary-General‘s Report: Barry Cooper 8 Editor’s Message: Wolf Mayer 9 Inhigeo 50th anniversary volume 10 INHIGEO CONFERENCE AND EXCURSION REPORTS INHIGEO Symposium, Beijing, China, 24 to 27 June 2015, with intra and post-meeting field trips to the Peking Man Site, 26 June, and the Shandong Province, 28 June to 2 July 2015 11 Sessions 1-4 11 Intra-symposium Field Trip to the Fangshan Pluton, the Peking Man Site Museum and the Peking Man Site, at Zhoukoudian. 14 Session 5-6 17 Poster Session 17 Post-congress Field Trip to Qufu, Tai Mountain and Zhaoyuan.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe
    Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam Professor Nikola Angelov Jolkichev, Dsc (July 16, 1925 – August 8, 2017)
    GEOLOGICA BALCANICA, 46 (1), Sofia, July 2017, pp. 109–113. In memoriam Professor Nikola Angelov Jolkichev, DSc (July 16, 1925 – August 8, 2017) One of the greatest Bulgarian palaeontologists and stratigraphers, and a long-time teacher of geology, Professor Nikola Jolkichev, DSc, passed away on Au- gust 8, 2017, at the age of 92. His colleagues, collabo- rators, and students will retain the memory of a tire- less researcher with profound knowledge of the Up- per Cretaceous geology of Bulgaria. During the entire time of his professional career, Prof. Jolkichev proved to be a precise worker, but also a correct and respon- sive man who was always ready for cooperation and constructive dialogue and who never hesitated to offer help and advice to his younger colleagues. Professor Nikola Jolkichev was born on July 16, 1925, in the mountain village of Chuprene (Belograd- chik area, Vidin District, NW Bulgaria), into a modest peasant family. He completed his primary education in his native village. At the age of 14, he worked as an assistant to his uncle in Sofia, where he graduated from high school. Following his first passion, music, in 1951 he successfully applied and was enrolled in the Bulgarian State Conservatoire with opera sing- ing (bass-baritone). However, one year later, on the advice of his relatives, Nikola Jolkichev applied and was admitted to Sofia University (Faculty of Biology, tivities at Sofia University and defended his DSc the- Geology and Geography), from where he graduated in sis entitled “Stratigraphy of the North European type 1957 as a geologist. In the same year, he became an Upper Cretaceous in the area of the Balkanides and Assistant Professor at the Department of Dynamic and the Moesian Platform, to the east of the Ogosta River” Historical Geology of Sofia University, where he was on May 15, 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Okumuş & Yavan / Geçmişte Ve Günümüzde Seramiğin Kullanım
    ABOUT THE JOURNAL OWNER Rating Academy Ar-Ge, Yazılım, Danışmanlık, Yayıncılık, Eğitim ve Organizasyon Ltd. Şti. EDITOR IN CHIEF Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özlem YAYINTAŞ Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale/TURKEY SECTION EDITORS Basic Sciences and Engineering Prof. Dr. Ayhan ESİ Adıyaman University, Adiyaman/TURKEY Health Science Prof.Dr. Arzu MİRİCİ Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale/TURKEY Natural Sciences Prof. Dr. Levent ŞIK Celal Bayar University, Manisa/TURKEY MANAGING EDITOR & WEB EDITOR Cumali YAŞAR Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey Contact Sarıcaeli Köyü ÇOMÜ Sarıcaeli Yerleşkesi No: 276 D-I, Çanakkale / TÜRKİYE E-mail : [email protected] ; Web: http://ratingacademy.com.tr/journals/index.php/jsp i EDITORIAL BOARD Prof.Dr. Trajče STAFİLOV, Institute of Chemistry Faculty of Science Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, PO Box 162, 1001 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Prof.Dr. Alireza HEIDARI, Director of the BioSpectroscopy Core Research Laboratory at Faculty of Chemistry, California South University (CSU), Irvine, California, USA & President of American International Standards Institute (AISI) Irvine, California, USA, United States Prof. Dr. Necati MENEK, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Chemistry, Samsun, Turkey Prof.Dr. Vesna P. Stankov JOVANOVIC, Nis University, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Chemistry, Nis, Serbia Prof. Dr. William R. BUCK, Institute of Systematic Botany New York Botanical Garden Bronx, NY, United States Prof. Dr. Galin Yordanov IVANOV, University of Food Technologies, Department of Food Preservation and Refrigeration, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Prof. Dr. Bipan HAZARIKA, Rajiv Gandhi University, Department of Mathematics, India Prof. Dr. Binod Chandra TRIPATHY, Tripura University, Department of Mathematics, India Prof.
    [Show full text]