Position Statement 3.1 Transport of Live Animals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Position Statement 3.1 Transport of Live Animals POSITION STATEMENT 3.1 TRANSPORT OF LIVE ANIMALS The SPCA is opposed to all forms of transportation which compromise the well-being of all animals or which causes or may cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. TRANSPORTATION OF ANIMALS Animals are transported nationally and internationally for various reasons and purposes such as farm animals destined for sale, breeding or slaughter; wildlife industry operations; animals used for scientific purposes; animals moved to sporting events; legal and illegal pet trade; and travelling companion animals. The methods of transporting animals vary greatly from species to species and animals are transported via road, air and sea. The transportation of animals have known risks to animals and general animal well-being issues prior to, during and after transportation include but may not be limited to pain; suffering; distress; injuries; hunger; dehydration; heat stress; cold stress; diurnal variation; exposure to noxious gases; incorrect handling; risk of disease; unsuitable vehicles; long distances; unpredicted travelling durations; exposure to the elements; and death. The SPCA advocates that the most expedient means of transport must be used to ensure that all animals are loaded, transported, off-loaded and handled correctly and humanely. The well-being of any animal should not be compromised and there should be minimal stress to the animals during the journey. Regardless of the animal being transported and the purpose thereof, individuals have a legal responsibility to ensure that transportation procedures do not result in any pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm of any animal. This includes compliance with relevant legislation, including local and international codes, standards and regulations. The documents below have relevance to the transportation of animals; some required by law; some influenced by international treaties and conventions to which South Africa is a signatory; and some are based on a voluntary basis, unless it is incorporated by legislation or permit conditions; which include but are not limited to the: Animals Protection Act No. 71 of 1962; Animal Diseases Act No. 35 of 1984; Animal Identification Act. No. 06 of 2002; Performing Animals Protection Amendment Act No. 4 of 2016; National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act No. 10 of 2004: Threatened and Protected Species Regulations (TOPS); Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) regulations and permit conditions; South African Bureau of Standards / SABS 0331: Translocation of certain species of wild herbivore; South African National Standard / SANS 10391:2012: The welfare of wild animals transported by sea; South African National Standard / SANS 1884-2:2007: Vehicles for the transportation of wild herbivores by road to holding pens and other facilities; South African National Standard / SANS 1884-3:2008: Vehicles for the transportation of wild carnivores by road to holding pens and other facilities; South African National Standard / SANS 10379:2005: Zoo and aquarium practice; South African National Standard / SANS 1488:2014: Humane transportation of livestock by road; South African National Standard / SANS 10386:2008 (or latest version): For the care and use of animals for scientific purposes; Cape Nature Game Translocation and Utilization Policy for the Western Cape Province; Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Procedures and Standard Terms and Conditions for Keeping Wild Animals in Captivity; International Air Transport Association (IATA) Regulations; and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) - World Minimum Standard. TRANSPORTATION OF LIVE ANIMALS BY LAND Animal well-being concerns with regards to the transportation of live animals by land include but are not limited to: The capturing and handling of animals before loading; The incompatibility of animals being transported together such as mothers and calves transported with other adult animals or unsuitable species transported together; Disregard for the social grouping or structure of animals such as solitary and social animals transported together; Use of vehicles not suited for the species or specific animals; Exposure to unfamiliar sounds, smells and new environments; Exposure to unfamiliar temperatures such as vehicles parked in the sun or a wind chill factor that may result in heat or cold stress; No shading provided for animals during transport; Inadequate ventilation in vehicles; Overcrowding; Inadequate non-slip flooring; Starving and dehydration; Health and condition of the animals being transported; Use of vehicles that are not roadworthy; Adequate driver training and route plans to ensure the shortest and safest route; and Lack of emergency plans in case of breakdowns or accidents, including sick or injured animals resulting in animals left to suffer until the end of the journey before veterinary care can be provided. TRANSPORTATION OF LIVE ANIMALS BY SEA The transportation of live animals by sea, in particular, livestock intended for slaughter holds serious animal well-being concerns. It is unnecessary to transport animals intended for slaughter by sea, especially if viable and humane alternatives exist close to the point of production. This method of trade causes pain, suffering and distress to many animals, including high mortality rates occurring during the voyage. The SPCA advocates that the animals should be transported in carcass form. Animal well-being concerns with regards to the transportation of live animals by sea include but are not limited to: The conditions on the vessels are totally unnatural and do not provide for a suitable environment for the intended cargo of animals; Animals have to endure extended periods in inadequate and/or unnaturally small spaces including within the confinement of transport crates; Excessive lighting exposure resulting in lack of rest; Animals are subjected to unhygienic husbandry conditions during the voyage such as the build- up of faecal matter and urine; Build-up of noxious gases such as ammonia; Faulty or broken ventilation systems may result in animals suffering from heat stress or exposure to high levels of noxious gases such as ammonia; Due to the movement of the vessel, the animals may become injured or experience motion sickness; Unsuitable non-slip flooring may cause the animals to slip and become injured; Animals are at risk of being trampled by their companions; Water provision and suitable food for the animals may be compromised during the voyage; Provision of food and water is not necessarily accessible to every animal; Animals are forced to endure close proximity to humans for extended periods of time; Animals are transported without being accompanied by a veterinarian or experienced, trained and competent staff, resulting in a lack of provision of emergency treatment or euthanasia of animals where necessary; There is a lack of adequate treatment or quarantine sections on ships; and The offloading of animals is not necessarily monitored by any welfare organisation at the intended destination. TRANSPORTATION OF ANIMALS BY AIR Transportation of live animals by air must be done in accordance with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Regulations, including relevant legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice. Animal well-being concerns with regards to the transportation of live animals by air include but are not limited to: Exposure to unfamiliar sounds, smells and new environments; Disregard and negligence, as well as unforeseeable circumstances causing unnecessary delays at Cargo companies before flights; Lack of water provision prior, during and after transits; Lack of suitable species-specific transport crates; Poorly constructed transportation crates hold the risk of escape or injury to the animals in transit; Animals are loaded and flown to destinations without the necessary vaccinations; Animals are left on the apron in the sun and other weather elements for extended periods of time; Mixed species of animals are kept in close proximity with the risk of disease transmission, including predators in view of prey animals; Biosecurity protocols are not being adhered to; Incorrect and inhumane handling of animals by cargo company staff; and Inhumane methods used to smuggle animals via cargo flights. The SPCA bases its perspectives on the best available information and data available at the time. Our positions and opinions may change as more information and data become available. POSITION STATEMENT 3.2 LIVE ANIMALS AS PRIZES The SPCA is opposed to the award of live animals as prizes. WHY ARE LIVE ANIMALS USED AS PRIZES? Live animals are sometimes awarded as prizes in raffles, competitions or other fundraising events as a marketing tool or as a way to publicise and capitalise on sales, whilst animal well-being is not always considered. These competitions or events result in the winning person becoming responsible for the care of an animal without any prior consideration or proper planning taking place. The type of animals used depends on the target audience from domestic farm animals, companion animals to both indigenous and exotic wild species. The attraction of possibly winning a live animal whilst purchasing other commodities, is a marketing strategy which successfully promotes sales and is a lucrative drawcard, which the SPCA considers as exploitation to both the consumer and the animal. CONCERNS RELATING TO THE USE OF LIVE ANIMALS GIVEN AS PRIZES.
Recommended publications
  • Forum of Animal Law Studies) 2019, Vol
    dA.Derecho Animal (Forum of Animal Law Studies) 2019, vol. 10/1 35-58 Animal Law in South Africa: “Until the lions have their own lawyers, the 1 law will continue to protect the hunter” Amy P. Wilson Attorney. LL.M Animal Law Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, USA Director and Co-founder Animal Law Reform South Africa Received: December 2018 Accepted: January 2019 Recommended citation. WILSON A.P., Animal Law in South Africa: “Until the lions have their own lawyers, the law will continue to protect the hunter”dA. Derecho Animal (Forum of Animal Law Studies) 10/1 (2019) - DOI https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.399 Abstract Despite the importance of animals to South Africa, animal law is not yet recognized a separate distinct area of law. In an attempt to rectify this, the article provides a high level introduction to this highly complex field. By providing background and context into historical and current injustices regarding humans and animals, it alleges that the current legal system has failed to provide adequate protection to either group. By analyzing the existing regulatory framework and case law, it lays out the realities of obtaining better protection for animals in law. It then argues why it is particularly critical for the country to consider animal interests both individually and collectively with human interests by providing examples of how these interests intersect in practice. It suggests an approach for future protection efforts and concludes by providing some opportunities going forward for animal law reform in South Africa. Keywords: Animal law; South Africa; animals; animal protection; law; human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Husbandry and Welfare of a “Classic” Fish Model, the Paradise Fish (Macropodus Opercularis)
    animals Article Housing, Husbandry and Welfare of a “Classic” Fish Model, the Paradise Fish (Macropodus opercularis) Anita Rácz 1,* ,Gábor Adorján 2, Erika Fodor 1, Boglárka Sellyei 3, Mohammed Tolba 4, Ádám Miklósi 5 and Máté Varga 1,* 1 Department of Genetics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter stny. 1C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] 2 Budapest Zoo, Állatkerti krt. 6-12, H-1146 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] 3 Fish Pathology and Parasitology Team, Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungária krt. 21, 1143 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] 4 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Helwan 11795, Egypt; [email protected] 5 Department of Ethology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter stny. 1C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (M.V.) Simple Summary: Paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis) has been a favored subject of behavioral research during the last decades of the 20th century. Lately, however, with a massively expanding genetic toolkit and a well annotated, fully sequenced genome, zebrafish (Danio rerio) became a central model of recent behavioral research. But, as the zebrafish behavioral repertoire is less complex than that of the paradise fish, the focus on zebrafish is a compromise. With the advent of novel methodologies, we think it is time to bring back paradise fish and develop it into a modern model of Citation: Rácz, A.; Adorján, G.; behavioral and evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) studies. The first step is to define the Fodor, E.; Sellyei, B.; Tolba, M.; housing and husbandry conditions that can make a paradise fish a relevant and trustworthy model.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIMALS of the GREAT WAR the Impact of Animals During WWI Recommended Grade Levels: 5-8 Course/Content Area: Social Studies, Language Arts
    ANIMALS OF THE GREAT WAR The Impact of Animals During WWI Recommended Grade Levels: 5-8 Course/Content Area: Social Studies, Language Arts Authored by: Carol Huneycutt, National WWI Museum and Memorial Teacher Fellow ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS: • What role did animals play in the successes and failures of World War I? • How did animals affect the morale of the troops? SUMMARY: Animals played a large role during the conflict known as the Great War. From traditional warfare animals such as horses and dogs to exotic animals such as lions, monkeys, and bears, animals of all types were important to both the war effort and to the morale of the troops on the front lines. In this lesson, students will examine the use of different animals in various aspects of war. Students will then create a museum exhibit based on the contributions of one particular animal. STANDARDS Common Core Standards: ALIGNMENT: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.7: Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words. National Standards for English Language Arts (Developed by the International Reading Association (IRA) and the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE).) 1. Students read a wide range of print and nonprint texts to build an understanding of texts, of themselves, and of the cultures of the United States and the world; to acquire new information; to respond to the needs and demands of society and the workplace; and for personal fulfillment. Among these texts are fiction and nonfiction, classic and contemporary works. 4. Students adjust their use of spoken, written, and visual language (e.g., conventions, style, vocabulary) to communicate effectively with a variety of audiences and for different purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild at Heart the Cruelty of the Exotic Pet Trade Left: an African Grey Parrot with a Behavioural Feather-Plucking Problem, a Result of Suffering in Captivity
    Wild at heart The cruelty of the exotic pet trade Left: An African grey parrot with a behavioural feather-plucking problem, a result of suffering in captivity. Wildlife. Not Pets. The exotic pet trade is one of the biggest threats to millions of Everyone, from our supporters and pet-owners to the wider wild animals. World Animal Protection’s new Wildlife. Not public has an important role to play in protecting millions of Pets campaign aims to disrupt this industry and to protect wild wild animals from terrible suffering. We will work together animals from being poached from the wild and bred into to uncover and build awareness of this suffering, and take cruel captivity, just to become someone’s pet. action to stop the cruelty. This campaign builds on sustained successful campaigning Companies, governments and international trade to protect wild animals from the cruel wildlife tourism industry. organisations involved in the wildlife pet trade, whether Since 2015, over 1.6 million people around the globe have wittingly or not, all have a crucial role to play. They can cut taken action to move the travel industry. TripAdvisor and out illegal wildlife crimes, and they can do more to protect other online travel platforms have committed to stop profiting wild animals from this cruellest of trades. from wildlife cruelty. Over 200 travel companies worldwide have pledged to become elephant and wildlife-friendly. Now is the time to turn the tide on the exotic pet trade and keep wild animals in the wild, where they belong. Wildlife. Not Pets focuses a global spotlight on the booming global trade in wild animals kept as pets at home, also known as ‘exotic pets’.
    [Show full text]
  • Veganism: a New Approach to Health Miljana Z
    Chapter Veganism: A New Approach to Health Miljana Z. Jovandaric Abstract The word vegan was given by Donald Watson in 1944 in Leicester, England, who, together with several other members of the Vegetarian Society, wanted to establish a group of vegetarians who did not consume milk or dairy products. When the proposal was rejected, Watson and like-minded people founded The Vegan Society, which advocated a complete plant-based diet, excluding meat, fish, eggs, milk and dairy products (cheese, butter) and honey. Vegans do not wear fur items, wool, bone, goat, coral, pearl or any other material of animal origin. According to surveys, vegans make up between 0.2% and 1.3% of the US population and between 0.25% and 7% of the UK population. Vegan foods contain lower levels of cholesterol and fat than the usual diet. Keywords: veganism, health, supplements 1. Introduction Veganism is a philosophy and lifestyle that seeks to exclude the use of animals for food or clothing and includes all other forms of diet of non-animal origin. Vegan diet is based on cereals, legumes, fruits and vegetables. Vegans do not eat meat, fish, seafood, eggs, milk, dairy products, honey threads carry things made of fur, wool, bones, leather, coral, pearls or any other materials of animal origin. Within the commitment to a vegan lifestyle, there is a group of people who eat exclusively fresh raw fruits, vegetables without heat treatment. This group of vegans is called a row food diet. Veganism differs from vegetarianism in that it is reduced entirely to a plant-based diet, while vegetarians also eat some products of animal origin, when animals are not killed when obtaining these products, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Veterinary Journal La Revue Vétérinaire Canadienne Biosecurity Practices in Western Canadian Cow-Calf Herds and Their Association with Animal Health
    July/Juillet 2021 July/Juillet The Canadian Veterinary Journal Vol. 62, No. 07 Vol. La Revue vétérinaire canadienne July/Juillet 2021 Volume 62, No. 07 The Canadian Veterinary Journal Canadian Veterinary The Biosecurity practices in western Canadian cow-calf herds and their association with animal health Computed tomographic characteristics of cavitary pulmonary adenocarcinoma in 3 dogs and 2 cats Bordetella bronchiseptica-reactive antibodies in Canadian polar bears La Revue vétérinaire canadienneLa Revue vétérinaire Evaluation of platelet-rich plasma applied in the coronary band of healthy equine hooves Diagnosis and outcome of nasal polyposis in 23 dogs treated medically or by endoscopic debridement Sabulous cystitis in the horse: 13 cases (2013–2020) Presumed acquired dynamic pectus excavatum in a cat Computed tomographic diagnosis of necroulcerative reticulorumenitis with portal venous gas in a lamb 2020 CVMA ANNUAL REPORT RAPPORT ANNUEL 2020 DE L’ACMV FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY Your Future is Bright and Full of Opportunity At VetStrategy, we live our passion every day. It’s a place where uniqueness is embraced, personal development is encouraged, and a supportive team is behind you. Whether you are a veterinary clinic owner looking to be part of something bigger or an animal health professional seeking a new career challenge, VetStrategy wants to hear from you. LET’S START THE CONVERSATION Looking to grow your existing Looking for career opportunities? vet practice? Contact us at: Contact us at: [email protected] [email protected] FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY Protecting Veterinarians Since 2005 A specialized insurance program for the Canadian veterinary industry. Professional Liability | Commercial Insurance | Employee Benefits Join now and receive preferred member pricing on Commercial Insurance and Employee Benefits! Available exclusively to members of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Lovewisdom, Johnny. Modern Live Juice Therapy
    MODERN LIVE JUICE THERAPY by Johnny Lovewisdom Note: The author and publisher are not responsible for any adverse effects or consequences occurring from the ideas, procedures or suggestions in this book. This book is not intended to replace the advice of a trained health professional. If you have a health problem you should consult a holistically and nutritionally inclined health professional. Copyright 1964 by Johnny Lovewisdom FOREWORD This work was begun in 1962 and finished in 1964, which included my moving from the cool damp 8,000 foot altitude “temperate” climate at my place on the river near Otavalo, north Ecuador, to the warm dry 6,800 foot “tropical” climate of my new home at “Paradise” Vilcabamba, south Ecuador. The first chapter begins with my mind drowned in diseased condition of body, fighting kidney failure constantly only 3 or 4 days from death, a lack of circulation in the lower extremities, pale and discouraged: Someone was saying “Physician, heal thyself”. Finishing this book, after a year at my new found Paradise I forgot to mention my own condition, praising the health work of others thru live juice therapy. When people ask me if it is true that Vilcabamba is an “Isle of Immunity”, I tell them, not only does it heal cardiovascular ailments, arthritis, rheumatism, asthma, etc. but I don’t know of a condi- tion that Vilcabamba’s location could not help! “But what about the plague of anemia and some kidney trouble the inhabitants complain about?” But look here, I reply, everyone is remarking how pale I arrived and how rosy and healthier appearance I have gained, healing my anemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 1 Australasian Regional Environmental
    Proceedings of the 1st Australasian Regional Environmental Enrichment Conference. 1st -2nd November, 2006. The Royal Melbourne Zoological Gardens. Day 1 1 Wednesday 1 st November • Starting a training program for Sun Bear ( Helarctos malaynus ) at Perth Zoo: Incorporating animal management, medical management and behavioural enrichment. o Karen Rotherham- Perth Zoo • Life can be serious……but it can also be seriously good fun! o Michelle Whybrow- Auckland Zoo • (In)Valuable, Versatile Volunteers o Ray Wilton- Melbourne Zoo • Enrichment – a way of life, not just a novel object o Kerrie Haynes-Lovell- Queensland. • Evaluating enrichment: Why and how? o Margaret Hawkins- Zoological parks Board of NSW • Captivating Canids; Dingo enrichment at Healesville Sanctuary o Raegan Di Paolo and Adrian Mifsud- Healesville Sanctuary • Environmental Enrichment for shelter cats and dogs o Linda Marston - Anthrozoology Research Group, Monash University • A Behaviour Enrichment Plan for Tasmanian Devils Sarcophilus harrisii o Mandy Smith- Adelaide Zoo • Enriched Learning o Rick Hammond- Melbourne Zoo • The Challenges of enriching the birds and mammals of the Australian Bush Precinct at Melbourne Zoo o Megan Richardson and Karina Cartwright- Melbourne Zoo • When Enrichment Goes Bad o Dr Kate Bodley- Melbourne Zoo • Environmental Enrichment Plan for Elasmobranchs at Shark Bay o Sara Smith- Sea World, Gold Coast, Australia • Werribee’s Immobilisation Sling- Enrichment for all o Bev Drake & Joe Parsons- Werribee Open Range Zoo • Animal & Keeper Friendly Enrichment Toys o Joe Parsons- Aussie Dog 2 Starting a training program for Sun Bear ( Helarctos malaynus ) at Perth Zoo: Incorporating animal management, medical management and behavioural enrichment. Karen Rotherham Perth Zoo. Abstract We will soon be receiving two sun bears from Cambodia, 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Place Research Paper: “Cry ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Dogs of War!”: the Ac Nine Experience in the A.E.F
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Kevin and Tam Ross Undergraduate Research Prize Leatherby Libraries Spring 2017 3rd Place Research Paper: “Cry ‘Havoc!’ And Let Slip the Dogs of War!”: The aC nine Experience in the A.E.F. Amanda Larsh Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/ undergraduateresearchprize Part of the Cultural History Commons, Military History Commons, Other History Commons, Political History Commons, Public History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Larsh, Amanda, "3rd Place Research Paper: “Cry ‘Havoc!’ And Let Slip the Dogs of War!”: The aC nine Experience in the A.E.F." (2017). Kevin and Tam Ross Undergraduate Research Prize. 19. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/undergraduateresearchprize/19 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Leatherby Libraries at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kevin and Tam Ross Undergraduate Research Prize by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3rd Place Research Paper: “Cry ‘Havoc!’ And Let Slip the Dogs of War!”: The aC nine Experience in the A.E.F. Comments Amanda Larsh won Third Place in the 2016-2017 Kevin and Tam Ross Undergraduate Research Prize for her essay about the experiences of canine units in the American military during World War I. This essay is the original scholarship that emerged from that research. This essay is available at Chapman University Digital Commons: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/undergraduateresearchprize/ 19 “Cry ‘Havoc!’ And Let Slip The Dogs of War!”: The Canine Experience in the A.E.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Farms, Stigma and Harm
    animals Article Wildlife Farms, Stigma and Harm Jessica Bell Rizzolo Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; [email protected] Received: 25 August 2020; Accepted: 28 September 2020; Published: 1 October 2020 Simple Summary: Wildlife farming is a practice where wild animals are legally bred for consumption in a manner similar to agricultural animals. This is a controversial conservation practice that also has implications for animal welfare and human livelihoods. However, most work on wildlife farming has focused solely on conservation or animal welfare rather than considering all of these ethical factors simultaneously. This paper uses interview data with academics to analyze (a) the harms and benefits of wildlife farms and (b) how wildlife farms are labeled detrimental (stigmatized) or acceptable. Results indicate that consideration of the harms and benefits of wildlife farms incorporate conservation, animal welfare, scale disparities between sustenance and commercial farms, consumer preferences, species differences, the dynamics of demand for wildlife products, and governance. Whether wildlife farms are stigmatized or accepted is influenced by different social constructions of the term “wildlife farm”, if there is a stigma around use of a species, a form of production, or the perceived quality of a wildlife product, cultural differences, consumer preferences, geopolitical factors, and demand reduction efforts. This paper discusses how the ethics of wildlife farms are constructed and how shifts in context can alter the ethical repercussions of wildlife farms. Abstract: Wildlife farming, the commercial breeding and legal sale of non-domesticated species, is an increasingly prevalent, persistently controversial, and understudied conservation practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Information on Attitudes Toward Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and Management: a Survey of the Chinese Public
    animals Article The Impact of Information on Attitudes toward Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and Management: A Survey of the Chinese Public Zhifan Song 1,† , Qiang Wang 2,†, Zhen Miao 1 , Kirsten Conrad 3, Wei Zhang 1,*, Xuehong Zhou 1,* and Douglas C. MacMillan 4 1 College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (Z.M.) 2 Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China; [email protected] 3 International Association for Wildlife, Gungahlin, Canberra, ACT 2912, Australia; [email protected] 4 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (X.Z.) † Equal contributions. Simple Summary: The widespread dissemination of information related to wildlife utilization in new online media and traditional media undoubtedly impacts societal conservation concepts and attitudes, thus triggering public discussions on the relationship between conservation and utilization. In this study, questionnaires were distributed in seven major geographic regions of Chinese mainland Citation: Song, Z.; Wang, Q.; Miao, to investigate the public’s awareness and agreement with information related to the utilization of Z.; Conrad, K.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; wildlife in order to measure the impact of information on various issues relating wildlife conservation MacMillan, D.C. The Impact of and utilization. The Chinese public had the greatest awareness and agreement with information Information on Attitudes toward that prevents unsustainable and illegal utilization, and the least awareness and agreement with Sustainable Wildlife Utilization and information that promotes unsustainable utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Animal Welfare: Management of Wildlife Lecture Notes
    Module 21 Wild Animal Welfare: Management of Wildlife Lecture Notes Slide 1: This lecture was first developed for World Animal Protection by Dr Christine Leeb (University of Bristol) in 2003 and updated by Dr Matt Leach (University of Bristol) in 2007. It was revised by World Animal Protection scientific advisors in 2012 using updates provided by Dr Caroline Hewson. Slide 2: Today’s lecture introduces you to some of the biggest welfare issues affecting wildlife. We will concentrate on the main issues affecting free-living wildlife, and then focus on the welfare of captive wildlife. We will also touch on some ways that the welfare issues concerned might be resolved. Slide 3: In this module, we define a wild animal as: a free-living or captive animal from a species that typically lives without human intervention, and whose parents and forebears were not selectively bred for docility or ease of handling. As with other species, our concern for the welfare of wild animals concerns their physical functioning, their mental state/feelings and the performance of behaviours that are important to them. Typically welfare concerns revolve around birds and terrestrial vertebrates. However, note that all vertebrates are sentient, including fish, and that many invertebrates are likely to be sentient too or, at least, to be able to suffer pain. When we consider wild animals within the common ethical frameworks, respect for nature is commonly invoked by conservationists. That framework places more emphasis on the continuing welfare of the species as a whole, such that the functioning, feelings and behavioural aspects of an individual’s experience may be subordinated to the collective feelings, functioning and continued natural behaviour of the species and, perhaps, the wider ecosystem.
    [Show full text]