Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State: Evolving Identities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State: Evolving Identities Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State Evolving Identities, Competing Loyalties, and Shifting Boundaries Hakan Özo˘glu Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State SUNY series in Middle Eastern Studies Shahrough Akhavi, editor Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State Evolving Identities, Competing Loyalties, and Shifting Boundaries Hakan Özoglu State University of New York Press Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2004 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, address State University of New York Press, 90 State Street, Suite 700, Albany, N.Y. 12207 Production by Diane Ganeles Marketing by Michael Campochiaro Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Özoglu, Hakan, 1964– Kurdish notables and the Ottoman state : Evolving identities, competing loyalties, and shifting boundaries / Hakan Özoglu. p. cm. — (SUNY series in Middle Eastern studies) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-7914-5993-4 (alk. paper). 1. Kurds—History—19th century. 2. Kurds—History—20th century. 3. Kurds— Politics and government—19th century. 4. Kurds—Politics and government—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. DR435.K87O96 2004 320.54'089'91597056—dc 21 2003045674 10987654321 To Yurdanur and my children Contents Acknowledgments xi Note on Transliteration and Translation xiii List of Illustrations xv 1. Introduction 1 The Role of Kurdish Nationalism in the Emergence of the Turkish Republic 2 A Brief Discussion of Nationalism 3 Different Interpretations of Nationalism 4 Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Development of Identity 7 Nationalism in the Kurdish Case 10 Nationalism and Notables in the Ottoman Empire 11 Boundaries of the Research 13 Organization and General Arguments of the Chapters 14 2. Evolution of Group Identity: The Kurds and Kurdistan in Historical Texts 21 Origin of the Kurds 22 Kurds and Kurdistan in Medieval Sources 27 Serefhan Bitlisi 27 The Seventeenth Century: Ahmed-i Hani 31 Evliya Çelebi: A View of an Ottoman Traveler 33 Kurds and Kurdistan in the Late Ottoman Period 35 Kürdistan: The First Kurdish Newspaper 35 Semseddin Sami 37 The Post-World War I Period 38 Conclusion 40 vii viii Contents 3. State-Tribe Relations: Ottoman Empire and Kurdish Tribalism Since the Sixteenth Century 43 Tribe, Emirate, and the Kurds 43 Theoretical Framework 44 Definition of Kurdish Tribes 45 Kurdish Tribalism Prior to the Ottoman Conquest 46 Ottoman-Safavid Relations and “Kurdistan” 47 Ottoman Administration in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries 51 Classical Ottoman Administration 51 Ottoman Administration in Kurdistan 53 Decreasing Level of Autonomy 57 Ottoman Administrative Policies in Nineteenth- Century Kurdistan 59 Conclusion: Consequences of Ottoman Rule 63 4. Kurdish “Protonationalism”?: The Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries 69 The Nationalist Dimension of Kurdish Militancy 70 Bedirhan Pasha and His Revolt of 1847 70 The Naqshbandi Semdinan Family and Sayyid Ubeydullah 72 A Transformation to Nationalism: Two Kurdish Cultural and Political Organizations, 1908–20 77 Kürt Teavün ve Terakki Cemiyeti, or the Society for the Mutual Aid and Progress of Kurdistan (SMPK) 78 Kürdistan Teali Cemiyeti, or the Society for the Advancement of Kurdistan (SAK) of 1918 81 5. The Role of Preexisting Ties and Notables in the Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism 87 The Naksibendi Semdinan Family 88 Sayyid Abdulkadir 88 The Bedirhani Family 95 Emin Ali Bedirhan 95 Celadet Ali and Kamuran Ali Bedirhan 100 Other Members of the SAK in the Bedirhani Family 102 The Cemilpasazade Family 103 Ekrem Cemilpasa 104 Kadri Cemilpasa (Zinar Silopi) 106 Shaykh Sefik Efendi 108 Contents ix Mehmet Serif Pasha 110 Bediüzzaman Said Nursi 113 Hizanizade Bitlizli Kemal Fevzi 115 Conclusion 117 6. Concluding Remarks and Suggestions for Further Research 121 Directions for Further Research in the Republican Period 125 Notes 131 Bibliography 159 Index 179 Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to express my profound gratitude to my teacher and friend Stephen Dale for his support, encouragement, and guidance throughout the long years of this research. I feel truly fortunate to know him and privileged to call him a friend. This book would not have been written if I did not have at my disposal the guidance and expertise of friends and colleagues at the University of Chicago including John Woods, Robert Dankoff, Cornell Fleischer, John Perry, Heshmat Moayyad, and Bruce Craig. At different stages of this work, I also benefited from the knowledge of Victoria Holbrook, Jane Hathaway, Selim De- ringil, and Resat Kasaba. I am also grateful to Yurdanur Serhat for introducing me to several Kurd- ish families through whom I collected much needed oral information about the previous generation of Kurds. Without her help, I would still be searching for the location of these people, let alone be able to convince them to sit down for an interview. With gratitude, I must also mention that the American Research Institute in Turkey partly funded this research. I am also indebted to Cambridge University Press and to Taylor-Francis Press (www.tandf.co.uk) for allowing me to utilize my previous articles in preparation of this book. In closing, I would like to thank my wife and daughters for providing me with the emotional support that enabled me to cope with the vicissitudes of such a long commitment. Needless to say, I accept full responsibility for the shortcomings of this book. xi Note on Transliteration and Translation Transliteration into English of words that were originally spelled in Ara- bic script poses a special challenge. To provide uniformity, this study has tried to establish a consistent pattern in spelling Ottoman, Persian, and Arabic words. Except for terms common in English, regardless of origin, all words used in an Ottoman context are spelled according to Modern Turkish orthog- raphy. Therefore, all Turkish and Kurdish proper names are rendered in Mod- ern Turkish forms (Mehmet, not Muhammad; Serefhan, not Sharaf Khan; Ahmed-i Hani, not Ehmede Xani). For all non-Turkish/Ottoman names, this study has followed common scholarly spelling. In Arabic and Persian names, diacritics are omitted. Common Ottoman and Islamic titles were spelled in English, such as shaykh, pasha, and sayyid. I preferred pasa to pasha if it was part of a name (such as Ekrem Cemilpasa) or spelled as such in modern Turkish publications. A particular problem with this particular title arose when the same author’s name was spelled as “pasha” in English language publications and pasa in Turkish; Serif Pasha is the best example. Therefore, the reader will occasionally encounter different spellings for this word. For the rest, Turkish transliteration is used, such as mutasarrif and kaymakam. The Turkish system of alphabetization is also utilized for the place-names in Turkey, such as Diyarbakir. For places outside Turkey, the English spelling is preferred; e.g., Azerbaijan and Baghdad. All dates are according to the Grego- rian calendar; however, in some instances Islamic dates are added to the text. Unless otherwise indicated, all translations to English are mine. xiii Illustrations Maps 2.1. The Karduchi territory in Xenephon’s Time 24 2.2. Kurdistan according to Serefhan 29 2.3. A map of Kurdistan by Serif Pasa39 2.4. A map of Kurdistan according to Emin Ali Bedirhan 40 3.1. Ottoman Safavid border prior to 1514 and Kurdish tribes 50 4.1. Approximate areas controlled by Emir Bedirhan in 1846 and by Sayyid Ubeydullah in 1880 85 Figures 3.2. Kurdish tribalism prior to Ottoman control 55 3.3. Kurdish tribalism under the Ottomans in the Sixteenth century 55 3.4. The list of Kurdistan governors 62 3.5. Kurdish tribalism during the mid-Seventeenth to Nineteenth centuries 66 3.6. The result of the Ottoman centralization in the late Nineteenth century 66 5.1. The Semdinan Family 89 5.2. The Bedirhan Family 96 5.3. The Cemilpasazade Family 105 5.4. The Arvasi Family 109 xv 1 Introduction Entering the twenty-first century, the problem of Kurdish nationalism re- mains one of the most explosive and critical predicaments in the Middle East. With an estimated population of 20–25 million Kurds living mostly in Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria, there is a little doubt that the Kurds constitute one of the largest ethnic groups in the world without a state of their own. In their efforts to establish their own state, Kurdish nationalist movements in the twentieth century were involved in many clashes with the governments of the states in which they resided. These confrontations claimed tens of thousands of lives, mainly those of civilians during the same period. In Turkey alone, the death toll for the most re- cent Kurdish uprising—that within the last decade and a half of the twentieth century—amounted to more than thirty thousand. At present, Kurdish national- ism is still regarded as a direct threat to the territorial integrity of the above- mentioned states by their respective governments; and the fear is not entirely unjustified. The Kurdish question is evidently transnational in the modern Mid- dle East, but it is also international. Sizable Kurdish diaspora communities live and actively participate in nationalist politics in many European countries, most notably in Germany, France, and Norway. Hence, the nationalist aspirations of the Kurds are of keen interest to the greater international community. Despite the pressing need to understand and explain the nature and origin of Kurdish nationalism, the subject regrettably remains poorly studied. There are several reasons for the lack of interest in studying Kurdish nationalism by mainstream scholarship in Middle Eastern Studies.
Recommended publications
  • Intro Cover Page
    EXCERPTED FROM The Kurds of Iraq: Building a State Within a State Ofra Bengio Copyright © 2012 ISBN: 978-1-58826-836-5 1800 30th Street, Ste. 314 Boulder, CO 80301 USA telephone 303.444.6684 fax 303.444.0824 This excerpt was downloaded from the Lynne Rienner Publishers website www.rienner.com Contents Preface ix List of Acronyms xi Map of Kurdistan xiii 1 The Evolution of Kurdish Nationalism 1 Part 1: The Kurds and the Iraqi State, 1968–1980 2 The Long Road to Kurdish Autonomy 27 3 Paved with Good Intentions 47 4 Unholy Alliances 65 5 Deteriorating Relationships 83 6 Marginalizing the Kurds 99 7 An Imposed Autonomy 113 8 A Time for War 125 9 Interregnum 153 Part 2: Caught in the Crossfire, 1980–1998 10 “One War Begets Another”: The Iran-Iraq War 169 11 Rising from the Ashes 197 12 The Birth Pangs of Kurdish Self-Rule 209 13 Uncivil War in Kurdistan 231 vii viii Contents Part 3: A Kurdish Entity in the Making, 1998–2010 14 The Foreign Relations Imbroglio 245 15 From Victims to Victors 273 16 The Great Leap Forward in Post-Saddam Iraq 297 Part 4: Conclusion 17 “No Friends but the Mountains” Reconsidered 315 Bibliography 321 Index 331 About the Book 346 1 The Evolution of Kurdish Nationalism I met her in a Parisian café in October 1993. She had fled sometime before from Saddam‘s Iraq, where she had worked as a scientist. She was very friendly but, at the same time, extremely frightened. She dis- closed neither her name nor any personal details, except for the fact that she was a Kurd and had lived a nightmarish existence in Iraqi Kurdistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX Number 2-3 XX Number 2015 Volume Summer-Autumn PERCEPTIONS The Great War and the Ottoman Empire: Origins Ayşegül SEVER and Nuray BOZBORA Redefining the First World War within the Context of Clausewitz’s “Absolute War” Dystopia Burak GÜLBOY Unionist Failure to Stay out of the War in October-November 1914 Feroz AHMAD Austro-Ottoman Relations and the Origins of World War One, 1912-14: A Reinterpretation Gül TOKAY Ottoman Military Reforms on the eve of World War I Odile MOREAU The First World War in Contemporary Russian Histography - New Areas of Research Iskander GILYAZOV Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX - Number 2-3 ISSN 1300-8641 PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Ali Resul Usul Deputy Editor Birgül Demirtaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca Book Review Editor İbrahim Kaya English Language and Copy Editor Julie Ann Matthews Aydınlı International Advisory Board Bülent Aras Mustafa Kibaroğlu Gülnur Aybet Talha Köse Ersel Aydınlı Mesut Özcan Florian Bieber Thomas Risse Pınar Bilgin Lee Hee Soo David Chandler Oktay Tanrısever Burhanettin Duran Jang Ji Hyang Maria Todorova Ahmet İçduygu Ole Wæver Ekrem Karakoç Jaap de Wilde Şaban Kardaş Richard Whitman Fuat Keyman Nuri Yurdusev Homepage: http://www.sam.gov.tr The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kurds; History and Culture
    Western Kurdistan Association publications Jemal Nebez The Kurds; History and Culture Jemal Nebez THE KURDS History and Kulture Presentation held in German on the 19th September 1997 in the Kurdish Community- House in Berlin, Germany First published in German in 1997 by: The Kurdish Community House in Berlin, Germany First publication in English, including a Bio-Bibliography of Jemal Nebez, by: WKA Publications - London 2004 Translated into English by: Hanne Kuchler Preface by: Dr. Hasan Mohamed Ali Director of the Board of the Kurdish Community House in Berlin, Germany 1 Jemal Nebez The Kurds; History and Culture 2 Jemal Nebez The Kurds; History and Culture PREFACE On the occasion of the inauguration of the Kurdish community-house in Berlin, Germany in September 1997, the well-known Kurdologist Dr. Jemal Nebez held a warmly received speech under the title: The Kurds – their history and culture. This speech was not only of great importance because of its contents and coverage, but also because it was based on precise data and historic scientific evidence. In his speech Dr. Nebez covered various subjects, e.g. pre- Christian ancient history and the mythology of the Kurds, the cultural height and depth of the Kurdish people in the shadow of the numerous expeditions by alien peoples through Kurdistan, the astounding variety of religions in Kurdistan, with special stress on syncretism as the most striking feature of the Kurdish religious culture, delineating syncretism as inherently different from mixed religions. As an analytically thinking scientist (physicist) the speaker did not get stuck in the past, nor was his speech 3 Jemal Nebez The Kurds; History and Culture an archaeological presentation, but an Archigenesis, which in fluent transition reaches from past epochs to the present situation of the Kurdish people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ideas of Derviş Vahdeti As Reflected in Volkan Newspaper (1908-1909)
    THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) by TALHA MURAT Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University AUGUST 2020 THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) Approved by: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel . (Thesis Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Ayşe Ozil . Assist. Prof. Fatih Bayram . Date of Approval: August 10, 2020 TALHA MURAT 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) TALHA MURAT TURKISH STUDIES M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Derviş Vahdeti, Volkan, Pan-Islamism, Ottomanism, Political Islam The aim of this study is to reveal and explore the political ideas of Derviş Vahdeti (1870-1909) who was an important and controversial actor during the first months of the Second Constitutional Period (1908-1918). Starting from 11 December 1908, Vahdeti edited a daily newspaper, named Volkan (Volcano), until 20 April 1909. He personally published a number of writings in Volkan, and expressed his ideas on multiple subjects ranging from politics to the social life in the Ottoman Empire. His harsh criticism that targeted the policies of the Ottoman Committee of Progress and Union (CUP, Osmanlı İttihâd ve Terakki Cemiyeti) made him a serious threat for the authority of the CUP. Vahdeti later established an activist and religion- oriented party, named Muhammadan Union (İttihâd-ı Muhammedi). Although he was subject to a number of studies on the Second Constitutional Period due to his alleged role in the 31 March Incident of 1909, his ideas were mostly ignored and/or he was labelled as a religious extremist (mürteci).
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Bir Keşf-I Kadim Olarak Büyük Doğu Ve Necip Fazıl
    Bir Keşf-i Kadim Olarak Büyük Doğu Ve Necip Fazıl BİR KEŞF-İ KADİM OLARAK BÜYÜK DOĞU VE NECİP FAZIL Büyük Doğu yani “Doğunun doğuşu”. “Rüzgardan hafif topuklarla içimizdeki iklimlere doğru ruhani ve ince bir sefer” ediş hali. “Büyük Doğu, İslamiyet’in emir subaylığı…” “Büyük Doğu, İslam içerisinde ne yeni bir mezhep, ne de yeni bir içtihat kapısı…” Sadece “Sünnet ve Cemaat Ehli” tabirinin ifadelendirdiği mutlak ve pazarlıksız çerçeve içinde, olanca saffet ve asliyetiyle İslamiyet’e yol açma geçidi; ve O’nu eşya ve hadiselere tatbik etme işi…”[1] Bu durumda Büyük Doğu bir keşf-i kadimdir. Allah Resulü’nden (s.a.v.) günümüze kadar intikal eden İslami anlayışın keşif ve tatbikinden ibarettir. Bidayeti Mevcut haliyle Büyük Doğu, İslam’ın zuhuruyla başlar. Mazrufunu sahabenin mücadele tarzı doldurmaktadır. Tarih içerisinde görülen Büyük Doğu’nun sahabe devrinden tek farkı zarf değişikliğidir. Fakat zarf, mazrufa (sahabe devrine) nispetle kendini kıymetlendirirken “köle, bir emir subayı” olduğuna vurgu yapar. Yani Allah Resulü (s.a.v.) ve sahabeden intikal eden manaya bağlı kalmak Büyük Doğu’nun esasını teşkil eder. İlkeleri Büyük Doğu’nun mazrufunda pazarlıksız iman, tefekkür, amel ve dava şuuru vardır. Orada “iman” her şeyden öndedir. Mümin, tefekkürden önce “Ne getirdin, götürdün bildirdinse amenna” deme bahtiyarlığına erer. Tefekkür, iman ettikten sonra başlar ve Allah’ın zatı dışında her şeyi kapsamı içerisine alır. Amel imandan sonra gelir ve “salih” olabilmesi için de İslam’ın belirlediği esaslar çerçevesinde kıymetlendirilir. Bütün bunların neticesinde müminde gözünü kırpmadan her şeyini feda edebilecek bir dava ruhu tezahür eder. Sahabe imanla başlayıp dava şuuru ile kemale eren meratibi en güzel şekilde ortaya koyan insanlık tarihinin en muazzez kuşağıdır.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasavvuf Ile Ilgili Fetvalar
    TASAVVUF İLE İLGİLİ FETVALAR Hazırlayan: EBU MUAZ SEYFULLAH EL ÇUBUKABADÎ MUKADDİME Şüphesiz hamd yalnız Allah'adır. O'na hamd eder, O'ndan yardım ve mağfiret dileriz. Nefislerimizin şerlerinden, amellerimizin kötülüklerinden Allah'a sığınırız. Allah'ın hidayet verdiğini kimse saptıramaz. O'nun saptırdığını da kimse doğru yola iletemez. Şehadet ederim ki, Allah'tan başka hiçbir ilâh yoktur. O, bir ve tektir, O'nun ortağı yoktur. Yine şehadet ederim ki, Muhammed Allah'ın kulu ve Rasûlüdür. "Ey iman edenler! Âllah'tan nasıl korkmak gerekirse öyle korkun ve siz ancak müslümanlar olarak ölünüz."(Al-i İmran; 103) "Ey insanlar! Sizi tek bir candan yaratan ve ondan da eşini var eden, her ikisinden birçok erkek ve kadın türeten Rabbinizden korkun. Kendisi adına birbirinizden dileklerde bulunduğunuz Allah'tan ve akrabalık bağlarını kesmekten de sakının. Şüphesiz Allah üzerinizde tam bir gözetleyicidir."(Nisâ;1), "Ey iman edenler! Allah'tan korkun ve dosdoğru söz söyleyin. O da amellerinizi lehinize olmak üzere düzeltsin, günahlarınızı da mağfiret etsin. Kim Allah'a ve Rasûlüne itaat ederse büyük bir kurtuluşla kurtulmuş olur."(Ahzâb;70-71) Bundan sonra, Şüphesiz sözlerin en güzeli Allah’ın Kelam’ı, yolların en hayırlısı Muhammed Sallallahu aleyhi ve 2 www.islah.de sellem’in yoludur. İşlerin en kötüsü sonradan çıkarılanlarıdır. Her sonradan çıkarılan şey bid’attir ve her bid’at sapıklıktır. Her sapıklık ta ateştedir. Allah Azze ve Celle buyuruyor ki; “Siz Rabbiniz tarafından vahyedilene uyun, O’ndan başka dostlar aramayın.”(A’raf 3) “Bir şeyde ihtilafa düşerseniz, eğer Allah’a ve ahiret gününe iman ediyorsanız onu Allah’a (Kitabına) ve Rasulüne (sünnetine) döndürün”(Nisa 59) Maalesef Rasulullah sallallahu aleyhi ve sellem’in en çok sakındırdığı şeylerden olan bidatler hayat tarzı haline gelmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kurdish Diaspora in Canada: a Study of Political Activism and the Uses of the Kurdish Language
    The Kurdish Diaspora in Canada: A Study of Political Activism and The Uses of The Kurdish Language Esengul Tasdemir Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa Ó Esengul Tasdemir, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 Abstract This thesis focuses on the Kurdish people of Turkey, who have struggled and advocated for a separate nation-state of their own. The Turkish state’s denial of Kurdish identity, and its heavy assimilation and oppression of the Kurdish people have turned some Kurds into political activists, both in Turkey and in the diaspora. In addition, the historical ban and current stigmatization of the Kurdish language have crystallized the importance and centrality of the language, particularly for both Kurdish identity and the Kurdish movement. This thesis explores the forms of political activism in Canada of the Kurds originating in Turkey, and the role of the Kurdish language in their activism. Using a qualitative research design, interviews with activists and participant observations were conducted in the cities of Toronto and Montréal. The findings draw attention to the significance of community centres as umbrella institutions for political activism, and as sites for the enactment of different forms of collective resistance. The study also illustrates that the role of the Kurdish language in activism is more salient at a representational level. That is, the Kurdish language is represented as the main identity marker fuelling activism, implying that speaking Kurdish is an act of resistance and thus political.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of European, Persian, and Arabic Loans in Standard Sorani
    A Study of European, Persian, and Arabic Loans in Standard Sorani Jafar Hasanpoor Doctoral dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Iranian languages presented at Uppsala University 1999. ABSTRACT Hasanpoor, J. 1999: A Study of European, Persian and Arabic Loans in Standard Sorani. Reports on Asian and African Studies (RAAS) 1. XX pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-506-1353-7. This dissertation examines processes of lexical borrowing in the Sorani standard of the Kurdish language, spoken in Iraq, Iran, and the Kurdish diaspora. Borrowing, a form of language contact, occurs on all levels of language structure. In the pre-standard literary Kurdish (Kirmanci and Sorani) which emerged in the pre-modern period, borrowing from Arabic and Persian was a means of developing a distinct literary and linguistic tradition. By contrast, in standard Sorani and Kirmanci, borrowing from the state languages, Arabic, Persian, and Turkish, is treated as a form of domination, a threat to the language, character, culture, and national distinctness of the Kurdish nation. The response to borrowing is purification through coinage, internal borrowing, and other means of extending the lexical resources of the language. As a subordinate language, Sorani is subjected to varying degrees of linguistic repression, and this has not allowed it to develop freely. Since Sorani speakers have been educated only in Persian (Iran), or predominantly in Arabic, European loans in Sorani are generally indirect borrowings from Persian and Arabic (Iraq). These loans constitute a major source for lexical modernisation. The study provides wordlists of European loanwords used by Hêmin and other codifiers of Sorani.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Artboard 1 Copy
    The First One Who Divided Their Countries and Displaced Them Suleiman the Magnificent Inaugurated the Kurdish “Bloodbath” History is merciless. Leaders and headmen shall be aware that one mistake may lead a nation to damage. Sometimes, it may rather eliminate it. This is what happened to Kurds and their relationship with the Ottoman Empire. It started with mutual concern between the two parties. It was followed by an alliance that quickly ended and turned into hostility that caused bloody massacres from which Kurds suffered until today. The story details date back to (1514 AD) when Idris Bitlisi, the leader of Kurds at that time, made a political deal with Selim I (1520 -1512). The deal was that Kurds should help Selim to gain victory over the Safavid state; in return, Ottoman Sultan shall recognize the autonomy of Kurds and give them freedom to form their own army and in addition; not to interfere in their internal affairs. Indeed, the deal was made and Selim I gained victory over Safavids in Chaldiran (1514 AD). The deal between Kurds and Turkish was named Chaldiran. The situation did not last long; as soon as Selim I died (1520 AD), everything changed. Although alliances made between countries do not depend on the life or death of people, this was not applicable to Turkish sultans as whenever one of them superseded, he breached the covenant of his predecessor and so on. Thus, they were known as the Empire of breaching covenants. This was the first mistake of Kurds, even if they realized it too late.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Herunterladen
    The Ottomanism Of TheDie Welt Non-turkish des Islams Groups 56 (2016) 317-335 317 International Journal for the Study of Modern Islam brill.com/wdi The Ottomanism of the Non-Turkish Groups: The Arabs and the Kurds after 1908 Hamit Bozarslan CETOBAC-EHESS [email protected] Abstract After 1909, the leaders of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) abandoned the Ottomanist ideals that had earlier characterised the group, adopting instead a purely Turkish nationalist ideology. They were not necessarily hostile to Arab and Kurdish communities, but considered that the latter had no say in the definition of the Empire, let alone in its future. In contrast, many Arab and Kurdish intellectuals continued to define themselves as Ottomanists. These intellectuals, including Sāṭiʿ al-Ḥuṣrī and Şerif Pasha, were defenders of the fraternity of the Islamic umma and, before the ‘nationalist- turn’ they took after World War I, were opposed to any kind of nationalism within Islam. They could not, however, easily justify the fusion of Islam and an Ottoman entity defined as Turkish. Integration into the Ottoman Empire for them did not imply the dissolution of the Arab and the Kurdish component within its Islamic imperial fabric. Keywords Arabs – Kurds – Ottomanism – Muslim fraternity – nationalism – Committee of Union and Progress – Sāṭiʿ al-Ḥuṣrī – Şerif Pasha Introduction Seen from Istanbul, Ottomanism has always been a rather vague concept that no authority has ever been able or willing to define. Although the term has been widely used in the second half of the 19th century, it has never been as- sociated with a concerted policy that takes into account the extraordinary ISSN 0043-2539 (print version) ISSN 1570-0607 (online version) WDI 3-4 ©Die koninklijke Welt des brillIslams nv, 56 leiden, (2016) 2016 | doi 317-335 10.1163/15700607-05634p03Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 02:02:43PM via free access Ottomanism Then & Now 318 Bozarslan demographic, ethnic, religious and social complexity of the Empire.
    [Show full text]