DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX G Traffic Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX G Traffic Study APPENDIX G Traffic Study 1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201, Monterey Park, CA 91754 T: 323.260.4703 | F: 323.260.4705 | www.koacorp.com MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO Traffic Impact Study for City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanitation (LASAN) East West Valley Interceptor Sewer Project May 28, 2019 Prepared For: CDM Smith 46 Discovery, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 752-5452 Prepared by: 1100 Corporate Centeer Drive, Suite 201 Monterey Park, California 91754 (323) 260-4703 JB81140 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................................................................2 1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS ....................................................................................................................................................................4 1.4 LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................................................................6 2. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 8 2.1 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ........................................................................................................................................8 2.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................................................................................................................................................................9 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS .......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE ................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION ............................................................................................................ 13 3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................................... 14 3.6 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.7 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT VOLUMES ............................................................................................................................. 18 4. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TRIP GENERATION ...................................................................... 19 4.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................. 21 5. FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 23 5.1 AMBIENT GROWTH ................................................................................................................................................................ 23 5.2 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE ......................................................................................... 23 5.2 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE .............................................................................. 24 6. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION-PERIOD CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ..................................................... 26 6.1 STUDY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 26 6.2 STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 27 7. PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................. 29 7.1 DETERMINATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................ 29 7.2 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TRAFFIC IMPACTS – STUDY INTERSECTIONS ............................................................. 29 7.3 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TRAFFIC IMPACTS – ROADWAY SEGMENTS............................................................... 30 7.4 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON PROPERTY ACCESS............................................................................................... 31 7.5 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT ACCESS ............................................................. 31 7.6 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON ON-STREET PARKING .......................................................................................... 32 7.7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON PARALLEL ROADWAY CORRIDORS ............................................................................................ 32 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LASAN EAST WEST VALLEY INTERCEPTOR SEWER PROJECT PREPARED FOR CDM SMITH PAGE i List of Figures FIGURE 1 – PROJECT CORRIDOR 3 FIGURE 2 – STUDY INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY SEGMENT LOCATIONS 11 FIGURE 3 – EXISTING INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATION 16 FIGURE 4 – EXISTING AM/PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES 17 FIGURE 5 – INTERSECTION APPROACH LANE CONFIGURATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION 22 FIGURE 6 – FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES 25 FIGURE 7 – FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD – AM/PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES 28 List of Tables TABLE 1 – CIRCULAR 212 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS 7 TABLE 2 – EXISTING PROJECT CORRIDOR ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS 12 TABLE 3 – EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE SUMMARY 13 TABLE 4 – INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE – EXISTING CONDITIONS 15 TABLE 5 – SEGMENT PERFORMANCE – EXISTING CONDITIONS 18 TABLE 6 – PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 20 TABLE 7 – FUTURE WITHOUT-PROJECT STUDY INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 24 TABLE 8 – FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE 24 TABLE 9 – INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE –PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 26 TABLE 10 – ROADWAY SEGMENT PERFORMANCE –PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 27 Appendices APPENDIX A – TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX B1 – LADOT CMA LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS – EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS APPENDIX B2– LADOT CMA LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS – FUTURE WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY – LASAN EAST WEST VALLEY INTERCEPTOR SEWER PROJECT PREPARED FOR CDM SMITH PAGE ii 1. Introduction This report documents the traffic analysis prepared by KOA Corporation to assess the traffic impact of the proposed East West Valley Interceptor Sewer Project (proposed Project), located in the San Fernando Valley area of the City of Los Angeles. The City of Los Angeles’ Bureau of Sanitation (LASAN) is proposing to construct a new force main sewer to divert and transport wastewater from sewer basin areas in the eastern San Fernando Valley to the Donald C. Tillman Water Reclamation Plant (DCTWRP). This traffic study assesses the potential traffic impact of the construction of the proposed Project. Post-project, or operational, traffic impacts will be less than significant as the pipeline will not require active management to operate. Routine project maintenance in the operations period will not create a significant level of regularly-generated trips. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project centers on a six mile-long force main sewer, running underneath and parallel to Victory Boulevard in the North Hollywood – Valley Village and Van Nuys – North Sherman Oaks communities of the City of Los Angeles. The sewer project is divided into six segments based on linkages to diversion structures and pump stations, which will direct sewage from existing sewage infrastructure into the new sewer (as described in Section 1.2): Stretch 1 – Vineland to Tujunga: Approximately 2,660 feet of 24-inch pipe, located 7 feet below grade, from Vineland Avenue (adjacent to the Vineland Pump Station and Diversion Structure) to Tujunga Avenue, adjacent to the Tujunga Pump Station and Diversion Structure. Stretch 2 – Tujunga to Lankershim: Approximately 2,635 feet of 24-inch pipe, located 7 feet below grade, from Tujunga Avenue to Lankershim Boulevard, adjacent to the Lankershim Pump Station and Diversion Structure. Stretch 3 – Lankershim to Laurel Canyon: Approximately 2,631 feet of 30-inch pipe, located 7 to 11 feet below grade, from Lankershim Boulevard to Laurel Canyon Boulevard, adjacent to the Laurel Canyon Pump Station and Diversion Structure. Stretch 4 – Laurel Canyon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Demille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM The DeMille Apartments 7716 Laurel Canyon Blvd | North Hollywood, CA MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 2 2 | APARTMENT NAME CONTENTS 04 |PROPERTY OVERVIEW MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 06 |AREA OVERVIEW - SAN FERNANDO VALLEY 10 |FINANCIAL OVERVIEW EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY BRANDON DICKER ASSOCIATE-MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 818 923 6118 Mobile +1 818 523 1754 [email protected] License No. 01958894 (CA) DAVID HARRINGTON EVP & NATIONAL DIRECTOR - MULTIFAMILY Direct +1 310 295 1170 Mobile +1 310 497 5590 [email protected] License No. 01320460 (CA) 3 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS 4 Property Overview OPPORTUNITY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 7716 Laurel Canyon Boulevard presents a unique opportunity to capitalize • 16 Units, Built in 1970 MATTHEWS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE MATTHEWS on a well maintained multifamily property in one of Los Angeles’s most • Tremendous Rent Upside Potential of 83% popular rental markets, North Hollywood. Built in 1970, the building has • Great Mix of One, Two, and Three Bedroom Units been maintained very well and has a quiet and secluded feel. With central AC, heating, and on-site laundry, tenants are provided with the essentials • Building Size of 14,979 Square Feet and amenities of living in a prime neighborhood. This building will provide • Currently 100% Occupied an investor a great value-add opportunity with tremendous upside in rents • Lot Size of 0.45 Acres with R3 Zoning upwards of 89 percent. • Front Structure is Two Stories with 10 units, Back Structure is Two Stories with 6 Units The building consists of 16 units which include six one-bedroom units, • Units Feature Central Air Conditioning nine two-bedroom units, and one three-bedroom unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resource Guide North Hollywood
    Community Resource Guide North Hollywood Introduction Comprehensive Community Health Centers, Inc. (CCHC) is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) and a California Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation. CCHC is among the top community health center systems in Los Angeles County having grown in health service visits from 45,000 visits in 2004 to over 129,000 visits in 2015. With this guide, CCHC will provide you with the proper resources to help you an your families. What you will find The Community Resource Guide for Comprehensive Community Health Centers is divided into 14 sections. Table of Contents 2-1-1 LA County Infoline………………………………………………………...……………….. Child Support Services………………………………………………………...……………….. Crisis Hotlines………………………………………………………………………………..…… Domestic Violence……………………………………………………………………………….. Employment………………………………………………………………………………….. Food Banks …………………………………………………………………………..…………… Grief & Loss Services ………………………………………………………………………….. Legal Services …………………………………………………………………………..…………... Mental Health …………………………………………………………………………..…….……... Physical Activity …………………………………………………………………………………… Self– Help Groups………………………………………………………………………………….. Shelters ………………………………………….……………………………………..…………… Substance Abuse………………………………………………………………………………….. Utility Services………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 2-1-1 LA County– Infoline 3 2-1-1 LA County Infoline Website: www.healthcity.com Services: Dial 2-1-1 from any area code for free 24-hr multilingual information & referrals to human services. Referrals are available for domestic violence,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 - Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
    Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures CHAPTER 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3-1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with the information necessary to understand and evaluate the potential environmental impacts due to implementation of the proposed Los Angeles Valley College Facilities Master Plan (Master Plan). In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (§15128 and §15143), this EIR focuses on the impacts identified in the NOP and during project scoping as needing further analysis (visual resources; air quality, historical resources; archaeological resources; paleontological resources; geology/soils/seismicity; hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use and planning; noise; population and housing; public services; transportation, traffic and parking; and public utilities). A list of the impacts determined to be less than significant and the reasons for that determination are provided in Chapter 5. To assist the reader, each environmental impact category in this EIR is discussed separately. These discussions include a description of the environmental setting, the criteria used to determine significance of potential effects, the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project, mitigation measures, and any unavoidable significant adverse effects that would remain after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. The environmental setting discussions contain a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project as it existed at the time the Notice of Preparation was distributed (January 2003). The existing environmental conditions described in the setting sections serve as a baseline for the impact analyses in this EIR. The significance criteria identified for each environmental impact category are based on the definitions that have been developed and established by the Los Angeles Community College District, various public agencies, or professional organizations and are consistent with the State CEQA Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Plan
    VENTURA-CAHUENGA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR Specific Plan Ordinance No. 166,560 Effective February 16, 1991 Amended by Ordinance No. 171,240 Effective September 25, 1996 Amended by Ordinance No. 174,052 Effective August 18, 2001 Specific Plan Procedures Amended by Ordinance No. 173,455 TABLE OF CONTENTS MAPS Specific Plan Area Section 1. Establishment of Specific Plan Section 2. Purposes Section 3. Relationship to Other Provisions of the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 4. Definitions Section 5. Prohibitions, Violations, Enforcement, Use Limitations and Restrictions, and Exemptions Section 6. Building Limitations Section 7. Land Use Regulations Section 8. Sign Regulations Section 9. Project Permit Compliance Section 10. Transportation Mitigation Standards and Procedures Section 11. Project Impact Assessment Fee Section 12. PIA Fee-Funded Improvements and Services Section 13. Prior Projects Permitted Section 14. Public Right-Of-Way Improvements Section 15. Plan Review Section 16. Alley Vacations Section 17. Owners Acknowledgment of Limitations Section 18. Severability Section 19. Specific Plan Exceptions Exemption Section 20. Repeal of Existing Ventura/Cahuenga Corridor Specific Plan Ordinance A Part of the General Plan - City of Los Angeles www.lacity.org/Pln (General Plans) Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan Exhibits A-G Tarzana Section A Corbin Av B Reseda Bl Tampa Av Wilbur Av Winnetka Av Lindley Av Topanga Canyon Bl Burbank Bl Shoup Av Canoga Av Sherman Oaks Section De Soto Av Fallbrook Av Zelzah Av White Oak Av C Louise Av
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of EXISTING CONDITIONS a Subregional View Of
    ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A subregional view of travel on the Westside has been drawn from interviews with elected officials, meetings with MTA and other agencies and analysis of existing data. The subregion considered in this analysis is shown in Figure 1. Because transportation does not respect political boundaries, the Westside Mobility Study area is roughly all of Los Angeles County west of La Brea Avenue, north of Los Angeles International Airport and south of Mulholland Drive. The Westside has many of the most important activity centers in all of Southern California; 16 of these are shown in Figure 2. The Westside Mobility Study has begun to define what might be done to meet those needs for improved linkages, specifying the most critical locations for major transit improvements and other multimodal improvements. Evaluation of Existing Transportation Conditions A goal of the Westside Mobility Study is to provide an accurate picture of the existing traffic and congestion levels on primary arterials and corridors in the Westside area. As there was a large amount of readily available, current data, no new supplementary traffic counts were conducted. Data was acquired from the following sources and ranges predominantly from 2000 to the present day: · Traffic data from the Cities of Beverly Hills, Culver City, Santa Monica and West Hollywood · Transit data from Culver City Bus, Big Blue Bus and MTA · Information from MTA’s Short Range Transportation Plan: Technical Document · Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) database of traffic counts · Previous Kaku Associates projects · Caltrans counts 10 WESTSIDE MOBILITY STUDY SSOCI TES A Corporation FIGURE 1 STUDY AREA Multi-purpose Activity Centers WESTSIDE MOBILITY STUDY SSOCI TES A Corporation FIGURE 2 MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS Area Characteristics - Employment, Population and Housing: The Westside area has at least 10% of the jobs in Los Angeles County and is home to over 6% of County residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Krekorian 2013
    LOS ANGELES CITY ETHICS COMMISSION Date Received COVER PAGE Please type or print in ink. RECEIVED NAME OF RLER (I.AST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE) Krekorian Paul Martin 1. Office, Agency, or Court Agency Name (Do not use acronyms) City of Los Angeles - Council Distdct 2 Division, Board, Department, District, if applicable Your Position Councilmember ¯ If filing for multiple positions, list below or on an attachment. (Do not use acronyms) Agency:. Position: Jurisdiction of Office (Check at least one box) = [] State [] Judge or Court Commissioner (Statewide Jurisdictiq~ [] Multi-county [] County of ~ . [] City of Los Angeles [] Other e Type of Statement (Check at least one box) [] Annual: The Period covered is January 1, 2013, through [] Leaving Office: Date Left ~L__J. December 31, 2013. (Check one) -Or- The period covered is ! / ¯ through O The period covered is January 1, 2013, through the date of December 31, 2013, leaving office. [] Assuming Office: Date assumed ! / O The period covered is ! ! . through the date of leaving office. [] Candidate: Election year and office sought, if different than Part 1: Schedule Summary = 5 Check applicable schedules or ~’None." ¯ Total number of pages including this cover page: [] Schedule A-1 -/nvestments - schedule attached [] Schedule C - Income, Loans, & Business Positions - schedule attached [] Schedule A-2 -/nvestments - schedule attached [] Schedule D - Income - Gifts - schedule attached [] Schedule B - Real Property - schedule attached [] Schedule E - Income - Gifts - Travel Payments - schedule attached
    [Show full text]
  • 8-4.6 Visual and Aesthetic Conditions
    Visual and Aesthetic Conditions 8-4.6 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC CONDITIONS This section analyzes visual and aesthetic conditions along the three Rapid Bus alternatives: RB- 3, RB-5, and RB-Network. 8-4.6.1 Setting 8-4.6.1.1 Methodology Generally, there are two types of physical features that characterize the visual environment of an area: • Built environment features including development patterns, buildings, structures, parking areas and roads, utilities, and signs; and, • Natural features such as hills, vegetation, rock outcroppings, drainages, and soils. The study area is defined to include local and distinct views as seen from within the immediate vicinity of potential RB stops. As no construction occurs except at RB stops, views along the alignment are not discussed in detail. Local views include immediate landscapes, and distinct views include mountains, hills and ridgelines up to five miles away. The setting is defined in terms of views. The corridors for the three Rapid Bus alternatives are subdivided into “visual assessment units” within which the views are discussed. Also included is an assessment of existing trees, lighting, and glare. a. Views The following terms are used to analyze and rank the overall quality of views in the study area, and are presented in the tables to follow: • Visual quality refers to the general aesthetics of a view. This analysis attempts to assess the quality of a view in an objective fashion through the use of the following descriptive categories: vividness, intactness, and unity. Vividness is the visual power or memorability of landscape components as they combine in striking and distinctive patterns; intactness is the visual integrity of the natural and built landscape and its freedom from encroaching elements; and unity is the visual coherence and compositional harmony of the landscape considered as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shoppes at Coldwater Village
    Retail / Restaurant Space for Lease - Studio City, California The Shoppes at Coldwater Village For More Information Contact: Andrew Cohen | 310.402.0211 | [email protected] Leasing Agent Andrew Cohen Senior Associate - Leasing [email protected] O 310.402.0211 LIC # 01996379 (CA) Ventura Boulevard The Shoppes at Coldwater Village Table of Contents 3 8 The Space The Market Area 9 The Location The Space Site Plan Proposed Division of Space A SF Space A1 ± 929 Space A2 ± 710 Space A3 ± 828 50’6” 20’10” 17’0” 16’9” 16’9” Space Available for Lease Address SF Type Rate/SF Term Delivery Availability 13003 Ventura Boulevard Space A ± 2,467 Restaurant / Retail Upon Request Negotiable Raw Shell Immediate Studio City, CA 91604 13003 Ventura Boulevard Space C ± 1,100 Restaurant / Retail Upon Request Negotiable Raw Shell Immediate Studio City, CA 91604 For More Information Contact: Andrew Cohen | 310.402.0211 | [email protected] 3 Development Summary The Shoppes at Coldwater Village at 13003 Ventura Boulevard is a new ground-up project in trendy Studio City, the most affluent and exciting neighborhood in L.A.’s San Fernando Valley. Ideally located on the western Petit Trois edge of Ventura Blvd in Studio City, this destination property bridges the The Buckley School gap between the two most popular and increasingly wealthy suburbs of the Valley, Studio City and Sherman Oaks. Sweetgreen and Philz Coffee recently signed leases; approximately 3,500 SF of divisible square feet remains in the exciting development. The subject property will effectively connect to the directly adjacent property (same ownership), which features a terrific mix of tenants such as DryBar, Susie Cakes, Bellacures nail spa, Pressed Juicery, Stacey Todd, PlateFit fitness studio, Sugared + Bronzed hair removal and tanning, Le Pain Quotidien, Il Tramezzino, Trim hair salon and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical and Dental Resource Guide 1
    Medical and Dental Resource Guide Organization Contact Days & Hours of Services Additional Information SPA operation provided Palmdale Regional Medical (661) 382-5000 Admitting Hours Medical Sunday and after hours on any other day 1 Center Monday-Friday 6am-6pm patients can register in the Emergency 38600 Medical Center Drive Saturday 6am- 12pm Department. Palmdale, CA 93551 www.palmdaleregional.com High Desert Regional Health (661) 471-4000 Monday-Friday 8am-4:30pm Medical Patient must be part of a Medi-Cal 1 Center Appointment # Urgent Care Health plan through L.A. Care or 335 East Avenue I (661) 471-4400 7 days a week, 8am-11pm Health Net and be assigned to High Lancaster, CA 93535 Last patient is at 8pm Desert Regional Health Center as their medical home. Prefer patient makes an appointment before walk-ins. Antelope Valley Community (661) 942-2391 Monday-Friday 7:30am-5pm Medical Accepts Medicare, Medi-Cal, Medi-Cal 1 Clinic-Palmdale Dental Clinic & HMO, sliding scale, and other plans. 2151 East Palmdale Boulevard, Monday-Friday 7:30am-5pm Dental https://avclinic.org Palmdale, CA 93550 AVCC-Palmdale East (661) 942-2391 Monday-Friday 7:30am-5pm Medical Accepts Medicare, Medi-Cal, Medi-Cal 1 37926 47th Street East Saturday 8am-8pm HMO, sliding scale, and other plans. Palmdale, CA 93552 https://avclinic.org Antelope Valley Community (661) 942-2391 Monday-Friday 7:30am-5pm Medical Accepts Medicare, Medi-Cal, Medi-Cal 1 Clinic-Health & Wellness Dental Clinic & HMO, sliding scale, and other plans. 45104 10th Street West Monday-Friday 7:30am-5pm Dental Urgent Care is open 7 days a week Lancaster, CA 93534 from 7:30am-8pm https://avclinic.org Tarzana Treatment Centers (661) 723-4829 Tuesday-Saturday 8am-4pm Medical Accepts My Health LA, Medicare, 1 Antelope Valley- Family Medi-Cal, Private Insurance and Medical Clinic Sliding Scale.
    [Show full text]
  • 4703 Coldwater Canyon Avenue Studio City, CA 91604 818-287-7163
    4703 Coldwater Canyon Avenue Studio City, CA 91604 818‐287‐7163 CARLO INC. COMMUNITY 24 Hour Maintenance Police 818‐505‐5238 11640 Burbank Blvd. N. Hollywood, CA 91601 UTILITIES 818-754-8300 AT&T 1‐800‐288‐2020 Providence Saint Joseph a.com Medical Center 501 S Buena Vista St. Burbank, CA 91505 Dept. of Water & Power Los Angeles 818-843-5111 1‐800‐342‐5397 ladwp.com U.S. Post Office 3950 Laurel Canyon Blvd. Southern California Gas Co. Studio City, CA 91604 1‐800‐427‐2200 1-800-275-8777 socalgas.com Dept. of Motor Vehicles Spectrum 14920 Vanowen St. 1-800-892-4357 Van Nuys, CA 91405 spectrum.com 1-800-777-0133 SHOPPING Trader Joe's Wesield Fashion Square 14119 Riverside Dr. 14006 Riverside Dr. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Gelson's Market Sherman Oaks Galleria 4738 Laurel Canyon Blvd. 15301 Ventura Blvd. Valley Village, CA 91607 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Whole Foods Market Universal CityWalk Hollywood 12905 Riverside Dr. 100 Universal City Plaza, Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Universal City, CA 91608 FITNESS SCHOOLS LA Fitness Center Riverside Drive Elementary 13069 Victory Blvd. 13061 Riverside Dr. N. Hollywood, CA 91606 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 818-506-4208 818-990-4525 Millikan Middle School Body Unlimited Fitness 5041 Sunnyslope Ave. 13514 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 818-528-1600 818-670-8554 Ulysses S. Grant High School 13000 Oxnard St. Van Nuys, CA 91401 818-756-2700 4703 Coldwater Canyon Avenue Studio City, CA 91604 818‐287‐7163 PARKS NIGHTLIFE Sherman Oaks Recreation Weddington Golf & Tennis Romanov Restaurant & Lounge Black Market Liquor Bar 14201 Houston St.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety on the Hoopa
    RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IN PACOIMA By Tony Dang, Jaime Fearer, Wendy Alfsen, Caro Jauregui, September 2015 California Walks; Jill Cooper, Katherine Chen, UC Berkeley SafeTREC Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in Pacoima BY TONY DANG, JAIME FEARER, WENDY ALFSEN, CARO JAUREGUI, CALIFORNIA WALKS; JILL COOPER, KATHERINE CHEN, UC BERKELEY SAFETREC INTRODUCTION The Pacoima neighborhood of the City of Los Angeles was identified as a focus community for a Community Pedestrian Safety Training, in collaboration with Pacoima Beautiful, based on residents’ interest in pedestrian safety and walkability, as well as recent and planned active transportation improvements in and around the neighborhood. Following additional conversations with the Active Transportation Division of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), Los Angeles Walks, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), faculty from the Urban and Environmental Policy Institute at Occidental College, and the office of Councilmember Felipe Fuentes, the community invited the University of California at Berkeley’s Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) and California Walks (Cal Walks) to Pacoima to facilitate a community-driven pedestrian safety action- planning workshop. Cal Walks facilitated the workshop on August 29, 2015, which consisted of: 1) an overview of multidisciplinary approaches to improve pedestrian safety; 2) two walkability assessments along Van Nuys Boulevard and other neighborhood streets; and 3) small group action planning discussions to facilitate the development of community-prioritized recommendations to inform the City’s ongoing active transportation efforts, as well as the County’s planning efforts for the East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor project. This report summarizes the workshop proceedings, as well as ideas identified during the process and recommendations for pedestrian safety projects, policies, and programs.
    [Show full text]
  • SN97, SN98, SN99 Pre Proposal MEETING MINUTES
    LOS ANGELES SANITATION AND ENVIRONMENT MEETING MINUTES Pre-Proposal meeting TOS SN-97 – San Fernando Valley Green Streets Network Evaluation along Agnes Avenue between Vanowen Street and Kittridge Street TOS SN-98 – San Fernando Valley Green Streets Network Evaluation along Victory Boulevard between Coldwater Canyon Avenue and Whitsett Avenue TOS SN-99 – San Fernando Valley Green Streets Network Evaluation along Glenoaks Boulevard between Paxton Street and Filmore Street. Location: 1149 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90015 5th Floor Executive Conference Room Date: January 10, 2019 Time: 10:00 am to 11:00 am 10:00 AM - Begin Presentation Introductions were made. Los Angeles Sanitation and Environment (LASAN) Project Manager (PM), Project Engineers, and On-Call manager provided presentation to the attendees, emphasizing on new/revised proposal dates, and construction completion dates. It was discussed that the presentation, questions and answers, and attendees list will be shared with all attendees. The three projects are a partnership effort between LASAN, LA Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and State Coastal Conservancy. Projects are located in areas that are disadvantaged, lack storm drain infrastructure, and have a high potential for recharge to the San Fernando groundwater basin. In addition, project sites are located in the LA River Watershed and are subject to TMDLs and the MS4 permit which make them ideal locations for water quality improvement. Project Engineers Ms. Esther Woo, Ms. Paola Grano, and Ms. Jane Parathara described site characteristics, the expected recharge volume, land use, and typical utility conflicts for their perspective projects. The area in the figure shown in the TOS solicitation and presentation is for reference only and the actual project and drainage area may extend beyond what is shown in dotted rectangles.
    [Show full text]