Backers of the Bashers of Public Education for the Past 20 Years Public Education Has Been Pilloried More Than Any Other Governm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Backers of the Bashers of Public Education for the Past 20 Years Public Education Has Been Pilloried More Than Any Other Governm Backers of the Bashers of Public Education Overview For the past 20 years public education has been pilloried more than any other government institution, thanks to the work of just a few individuals. The notion that the nation’s public schools are failing gained credence with the help of a core of well-financed critics of public education, who have used that financing to peddle their anti-public school venom. This paper takes a look those “anything but public schools” persons, and identifies who have been their “sugar daddies.” Our aim is to expose the backers of these public education ‘bashers.’ American Association of School Administrators July 2005 Background Over the course of the past 20 years public education has been served up as “failing” by those eager to see its downfall. The launch of that effort coincided with the 1983 release of “A Nation at Risk,” which a top political strategist for then-President Ronald Reagan called “a little report gathering dust” at the Education Department, that was released with great fanfare “because Reagan didn’t have an education plan” for his re-election effort. In the ensuing years members of the far right have attempted to link the word “failing” to public schools in the minds of the public. Cementing that concept in the public psyche should yield to fertile ground in which to plant and grow government vouchers to religious and other private schools. Is that goal altruistic or political? With the passage of the No Child Left Behind act, a law that uses a negative concept as its raison d’être, those who seek the downfall of public education now have a tool that uses the U.S. Department of Education to help attach the “failing” label to nearly every school system in the nation. Why has public education gone from a positive issue, around which members of both major political parties have coalesced for years, into a target for Washington domination of this most local of institutions? Much of the credit can be taken by those who have manipulated public opinion through speeches, newspaper and television interviews and editorial opinion, and an endless barrage of expensive print and electronic media advertisements. But where do these high-profile public school bashers get the funds to back their crusade against public schooling, the bedrock of state constitutions? The “People” Money Read our landmark study, “Vouchers: Who’s Behind It All?” (Updated June 27, 2005) http://www.aasa.org/government_relations/other/07_30_01_voucher_supporters.htm, to learn the names of the organizations, that ardently advocate for public money to be spent on private schools, and the groups that fund each of these tax-exempt entities. With this paper we intend to look at the individuals who are the most visible on the anti- public education/pro-voucher front, and the benefactors who give them the livelihood that allows them to pontificate. Grover Norquist – President, Americans for Tax Reform Statements: Norquist’s driving principle: “I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” (Source: NPR interview, 5/25/01) "We are trying to change the tones in the state capitals,” he told the Denver Post, “and turn them toward bitter nastiness and partisanship. Bipartisanship,” he said, “is another name for date rape." “The next person who runs for president, Norquist told Reason magazine, “should run on the six non-negotiables: (1) Racial preferences…(2) Tort Reform…(3) a single-rate tax system…(4) School choice, because the teachers' unions won't allow it. (5) Opposition to gun control. (6) A balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution…” “When you see [such] arguments [as] ‘should creationism be taught in the public schools?’ he told Reason, “Once you move to school choice you have eliminated that argument and it's not a problem any more.” “[I]f you privatize Social Security, if you voucherize education, if you sell the $270 billion worth of airports and wastewater treatment plants, eliminate welfare, and so on, you can get the federal government, state government and local government to basically half” Background: Grover Norquist served as a key aide to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and helped design Gingrich’s “Contract With America;” was on the campaign staff on the 1988, 1992, and 1996 Republican Platform Committees; and formerly was executive director of the College Republicans. He is also well-connected with large scale U.S. business interests, having served as economist and chief speech writer for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (1983-1984). [Source: MediaTransparency.org] Norquist holds a Master’s of business administration and a bachelor of arts degree in economics, both from Harvard University. Norquist serves on the board of the National Rifle Association of America, serves on the board of the American Conservative Union, served as a commissioner on the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce, a government-funded body created by Congress in 1998, and served on the National Commission on Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service, a government-funded body created by Congress in 1997. (Source: Americans for Tax Reform) Backers of Americans for Tax Reform: Walton Family Foundation $ 85,000 Sarah Scaife Foundation 100,000 Sarah Scaife Foundation 50,000 John M. Olin Foundation Inc. 50,000 Sarah Scaife Foundation 50,000 John M. Olin Foundation Inc. 75,000 The Carthage Foundation 50,000 Sarah Scaife Foundation 100,000 JM Foundation 25,000 John M. Olin Foundation Inc. 100,000 The Carthage Foundation 50,000 John M. Olin Foundation Inc. 100,000 The Carthage Foundation 75,000 (Source: Media Transparency.org) Note: for description of contributors, see “V: The Foundations” at http://www.aasa.org/government_relations/other/07_30_01_voucher_supporters.htm Lobbying Clients of Grover Norquist: Americans for Tax Reform Fannie Mae Joseph E. Seagram & Sons Americans for Tax Reform Microsoft Corp. – (sole lobbyist) $120,000 Echostar Communications Inc. Microsoft Corp – (sole lobbyist) $100,000 Distilled Spirits Council Edison Electric Group Interactive Gaming Council American Business for Legal Immigration American Immigration Lawyers Assn. First Amendment Coalition for Expression Joseph E. Seagram & Sons Distilled Spirits Council Microsoft Corp. – (sole lobbyist) $ 60,000 (Source: Center for Responsive Politics) William J. Bennett – Founder: Empower America, Fellow; Heritage Foundation Statements: “American schools are in general not very good, but our local schools are probably not any better.” “academic achievement among our students has, at best, stagnated during the past 40 years.” “To put it simply, the longer a child stays in school in the United States, the less that child knows relative to students in other industrialized nations.” “America is a land of second, third and fourth chances. When our K-12 education system fails, a number of safety nets cushion the fall. American companies now spend billions of dollars every year for on-the-job training, in large part to cover for the shortcomings of our school systems. In addition, our colleges and universities are increasingly devoted not to higher learning but to remedial education.” “The purpose of an education is not merely to prepare citizens for work, it is to prepare them for life…When our schools fail to fulfill this vital role, our citizens (especially those least able to learn these lessons at home) are forever diminished—and we, as a nation, are diminished as well.” “…it should not be a great surprise to anyone that the next chapter in education will be found in large part in the intersection of the public and private sectors. (Source: Hoover Digest, Winter 2001) “The real concern is when those in the education establishment use OBE (outcome-based education) to (1) eliminate objective measurable criteria (like standardized tests); (2) do away with the traditional subject-based curriculum in favor of an emphasis on things like general skills, attitudes and behaviors; and (3) advance their own radical social agenda. Increasingly, OBE is applied to the realm of behavior and social attitudes becoming, in effect, a Trojan Horse for social engineering, an elementary and secondary school version of the kind of “politically correct” thinking that has infected our colleges and universities.” (Source: Empower America Issue Briefing, 5/27/1993) “The president should fight for this critical element of this plan, for school choice is not simply an accountability issue, it is a moral and civil rights issue. It is about empowering poor parents with the option of a better education when their children are trapped in schools that repeatedly fail to meet basic standards.” (Source: Los Angeles Times, 5/4/2001) “I have often maintained that the chief enemy of public education in this country is the public education system itself. Bureaucracies at the federal, state and local levels have become a significant obstacle to an excellent education for millions of American children. Frequently, these bureaucracies are extraordinarily resistant to change, fiercely protective of their own interests, and incapable of allowing any aspect of teaching or learning to go unregulated.” “Models for academic excellence are all around us—again, simply consider the two million home-schooled children who are already receiving an extraordinary education.” (Source: World Magazine 4/28/2001) Background: William Bennett was chair of the National Endowment for the Humanities (1981-85) and U.S. Secretary
Recommended publications
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS . JANUARY 5, 1993 Compiled by DONNALD K. ANDERSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (267); Republicans in italic (166); Independent in SMALL CAPS (1); vacancies (1) At-Large ND; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan .......................................... Mobile 2 William L. Dickinson .................................. Montgomery 3 Glen Browder .............................................. Jacksonville 4 Tom Bevill ................................................... Jasper 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Ben Erdreich ............................................... Birmingham 7 Claude Harris .............................................. Tuscaloosa ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 John J. Rhodes III ....................................... Mesa 2 Ed Pastor 1 ................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 Jon Kyl ......................................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 1 Elected September 24, 1991 to fill vacancy due to the resignation of Morris K. Udall, May 4, 1991. ARKANSAS 1 Bill Alexander ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS . JANUARY 4, 2001 Compiled by JEFF TRANDAHL, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Republicans in roman (222); Democrats in italic (208); Independents in SMALL CAPS (2); vacancies (3) 1st VA, 4th MN, 32d CA; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan ........................................... Mobile 2 Terry Everett ............................................... Enterprise 3 Bob Riley ..................................................... Ashland 4 Robert B. Aderholt ...................................... Haleyville 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Spencer Bachus ........................................... Vestavia Hills 7 Earl F. Hilliard ........................................... Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Matt Salmon ................................................ Mesa 2 Ed Pastor ..................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 John B. Shadegg .......................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 6 J. D. Hayworth ............................................ Scottsdale ARKANSAS 1 Marion Berry ............................................... Gillett
    [Show full text]
  • Congressman Ron Packard Joins Advisory Board
    The Lares Institute. For Release: September 26, 2011. For Release: 3:00 p.m. (EST) Hon. Ron Packard Joins Lares Institute Advisory Board September 26, 2011. The Honorable Ron Packard has been selected to join the advisory board of The Lares Institute, a think tank that researches issues related to emerging technology, information governance and legal process management. He joins Executive Director Andrew Serwin, and Senior Research Advisor, Dr. Larry Ponemon. “I am very pleased to have Congressman Packard join our advisory board, and to have the opportunity to work with him once again”, said Andrew Serwin, Executive Director of the Lares Institute. Congressman Ron Packard was first elected to Congress on November 2, 1982 by a write-in vote – only the fourth successful write-in candidate in the history of the United States Congress. Congressman Packard served for 18 years, representing the 48th District in Southern California. He routinely captured over 70 percent of the vote in his reelection campaigns. He retired from the Congress on January 3, 2001 and currently is the Senior Partner in Packard Government Affairs, a San Diego and Washington based consulting firm. Ron Packard was born on January 19, 1931 in Meridian, Idaho, where he spent his youth and attended high school. After studying at Brigham Young University and Portland State University, he entered the University of Oregon Dental School and received his D.M.D. degree in 1957. From 1957 to 1959, Packard was stationed at Camp Pendleton, California on duty with the U.S. Navy Dental Corps. Following his service in the Navy, he relocated his family and practice to the Carlsbad area and founded the Packard Dental Clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E1919 PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENCE BY Congress has no constitutional authority to necessary for a science education, such as HOUSE WITH AMENDMENT IN single out any one academic discipline as de- labs equipment and computers, these bills will SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. serving special emphasis. Instead, the deci- particularly benefit those citizens who wish to 4886, TARIFF SUSPENSION AND sion about which subjects to emphasize improve science education. I therefore urge TRADE ACT OF 2000 should be made by local officials, educators my colleagues to reject the failed, unconstitu- and parents. tional command-and-control approach of H.R. SPEECH OF H.R. 4271 not only singles out science for 4271 and instead embrace my legislation to HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH special emphasis, certain positions of the bill return control of education resources to the will lead to a national science curriculum. For OF OHIO American people. instance, the bill calls for the Department of f IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Education and the National Science Founda- Tuesday, October 24, 2000 tion to coordinate and disseminate information SUPPORTING THOSE WHO REAF- FIRM THE OCCURRENCE OF THE Mr. KUCINICH. Madam Speaker, I rise on ``standard'' math and science curricula as ARMENIAN GENOCIDE today in support of H.R. 4868, the Miscella- well as licensing requirements for teachers of neous Trade and Technical Corrections Act. math, science, engineering or technology. This legislation is of great importance and its While local school districts are not forced to HON. MICHAEL E. CAPUANO passage must be concluded rapidly in order to adopt these standards, local schools will be OF MASSACHUSETTS be voted on by the 106th Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Memri's
    AL GHANNAM, ABDULAZIZ G., Ph.D., December 2019 TRANSLATION STUDIES IDEOLOGY IN MEDIA TRANSLATION: A CASE STUDY OF MEMRI’S TRANSLATIONS (294 PP.) Dissertation Advisor: Brian James Baer Translation is an invaluable tool for communicating between cultures and for bridging the “knowledge gap.” Based on this fact, the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) claims that the purpose of its translations of media content from the Middle East, mainly the Arabic-speaking world, is to bridge the knowledge gap that exists between the West and Middle Eastern countries. Although MEMRI’s stated goal is a generous and worthy one, its translations have attracted criticism from major translation scholars such as Mona Baker (2005, 2006, 2010a) and journalists such as Brian Whitaker (2002, 2007), as well as scholars from history and political studies. The main criticism regarding MEMRI’s translations revolves around the question of selectivity, or which texts are chosen for translation. However, no study to date has provided comprehensive evidence to support or refute that charge, which this study aims to do. This study focuses on English translations of texts and video clips that were found in the Saudi Arabia translation archive, published and available online on MEMRI’s website. By investigating all the Saudi media sources (e.g., newspapers, TV channels, Twitter, YouTube, etc.) from which MEMRI makes its selection of texts for translation, this study provides statistical evidence as to whether MEMRI’s translations are representative of what is being circulated in the source culture (Saudi Arabia) media. Supporting evidence is sought in MEMRI’s approach to the translation of titles and in its translation of video clips (subtitling).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Grantmaking Foundations and the School Privatization Movement
    Strategic Grantmaking Foundations and the School Privatization Movement Rick Cohen STAFF Meredith Brodbeck COMMUNICATIONS/DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT Julia Craig PROGRAM ASSISTANT Aaron Dorfman EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Kevin Faria DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Melissa Johnson FIELD DIRECTOR Anna Kristina ("Yna") C. Moore COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR BOARD OFFICERS David R. Jones (CHAIR) COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK Diane Feeney (VICE CHAIR) FRENCH AMERICAN CHARITABLE TRUST Lana Cowell (SECRETARY) OUR GIVING COMMUNITY Rhoda Karpatkin (TREASURER) CONSUMERS UNION DIRECTORS Marilyn Aguirre-Molina LEHMAN COLLEGE, CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Christine Ahn KOREA POLICY INSTITUTE Andrea Alexander CHINOOK WIND ENTERPRISES Dave Beckwith NEEDMOR FUND Louis Delgado Richard Farias TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS Deborah Felder MAINE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY Marjorie Fine CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE Cynthia Guyer SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOLS ALLIANCE Judy Hatcher ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT CENTER Larry Kressley Pete Manzo THE ADVANCEMENT PROJECT Nadia Moritz THE YOUNG WOMEN’S PROJECT Russell Roybal NATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN TASK FORCE Gary Snyder NONPROFIT IMPERATIVE Helen Vinton SOUTHERN MUTUAL HELP ASSOCIATION Jodi Williams COMMUNITY SHARES OF MINNESOTA PAST BOARD CHAIRS Paul Castro JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELEs John Echohawk NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND Pablo Eisenberg PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Terry Odendahl NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS Board member organization affiliations listed for identification purposes only. Strategic Grantmaking
    [Show full text]
  • Target San Diego
    Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government Lee Cokorinos Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government A Report for the Center on Policy Initiatives Lee Cokorinos November 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgments . ii Foreword . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction: The National Significance of the Battle for San Diego . 1 1. The National Context: Key Organizations Leading the Right’s Assault on the States and Cities . 5 A. The American Legislative Exchange Council . 7 B. The State Policy Network . 13 C. The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy . 17 D. The Pacific Research Institute . 21 E. Americans for Tax Reform and the Project for California’s Future . 25 F. The Reason Foundation . 33 2. The Performance Institute and the Assault on San Diego . 39 3. The Battle for America’s Cities: A National Engagement . 49 Endnotes . 57 I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments This report was made possible through the generous support of the New World Foundation. Special thanks go to Colin Greer and Ann Bastian of New World for their leadership in fostering the movement for progressive renewal. Thanks also to Donald Cohen of the Center on Policy Initiatives for contributing keen insights and the benefit of his ground level experience at engaging the right at every step of the research and writing, to Murtaza Baxamusa of CPI for sharing his expertise, and to veteran political researcher Jerry Sloan for his valuable advice. Jerry’s decades of research on the California and the national right have educated a generation of activists.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Study of Media Transparency in the U.S. Advertising Industry • • •
    • • • An Independent Study of Media Transparency in the U.S. Advertising Industry • • • Prepared for: The Association of National Advertisers June 7, 2016 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Background and Purpose .............................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Firm Background ...................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Study Scope ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1. Non-Transparent Business Practices Defined ......................................................... 5 2.2.2. Qualifications ............................................................................................................ 6 2.3. Overview of Prior Transparency Studies ....................................................................... 6 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 8 Findings ............................................................................................................... 11 4.1. There Is A Fundamental Disconnect In The Industry Regarding The Basic Nature Of The Advertiser-Agency Relationship ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model for Media Criticism: Lessons from the Schiavo Coverage
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 61 Number 3 Volume 61 Number 3 (April 2007) SYMPOSIUM The Schiavo Case: Article 4 Interdisciplinary Perspectives 4-1-2007 A New Model for Media Criticism: Lessons from the Schiavo Coverage Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Family Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, A New Model for Media Criticism: Lessons from the Schiavo Coverage, 61 U. Miami L. Rev. 665 (2007) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol61/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A New Model for Media Criticism: Lessons from the Schiavo Coverage LILI LEVI* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 665 II. SHARPLY DIVIDED CRITICISM OF SCHIAVO MEDIA COVERAGE ................... 666 . III. How SHOULD WE ASSESS MEDIA COVERAGE? 674 A. JournalisticStandards ............................................ 674 B. Internal Limits of JournalisticStandards ............................. 677 C. Modern Pressures on Journalistic Standards and Editorial Judgment .... 680 1. CHANGES IN INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND RESULTING ECONOMIC PRESSURES ................................................... 681 2. THE TWENTY-FOUR HOUR NEWS CYCLE ................................. 686 3. BLURRING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN NEWS, OPINION, AND ENTERTAINMENT .............................................. 688 4. THE RISE OF BLOGS AND NEWS/COMMENTARY WEB SITES ................. 690 5. "NEWS AS CATFIGHT" - CHANGING DEFINITIONS OF BALANCE ...........
    [Show full text]
  • The Voucher Veneer: the Deeper Agenda to Privatize Public Education
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 478 284 UD 035 812 AUTHOR Jacob, Matt TITLE The Voucher Veneer: The Deeper Agenda To Privatize Public Education. Special Report. PUB DATE 2003-07-00 NOTE 36p.; Produced by People for the American Way Foundation. AVAILABLE FROM People for the American Way Foundation, 2000 M Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-467-4999; Tel: 800- 326 -7329 (Toll Free); e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.pfaw.org. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Accountability; Criticism ;Disabilities; Educational Finance; *Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Government Role; Politics of Education; Private Education; *Privatization; *Public Education; Public Opinion; School Choice IDENTIFIERS *Religious Right ABSTRACT This paper asserts that government responsibilities in education and the strong connection of Americans with their public schools are being tested, as a network of Religious Right groups, free-market economists, ultraconservative columnists, and others use vouchers as a vehicle to achieve their ultimate goal of privatizing education. Their long- term goal is to make all schooling an activity supplied by private sources. The movement believes that targeted voucher plans give them a foot in the door toward achieving this goal. The paper discusses the deeper agenda; the incremental achievement of privatization; roots of the voucher movement; other privatization strategies; spinning the voucher message; what privatization would mean; the education market; those left behind by privatization; and the unreceptive public. The paper explains that many pro- privatization groups offer two messages (one for committed followers and another for the broader public).
    [Show full text]
  • GPPAC Media Training Manual
    GPPAC Media Training Manual By Michael Shank GPPAC Media Training Manual The Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict Laan van Meerdervoort 70 2517 AN Den Haag The Netherlands Tel.: +31 70 3110970 Fax: +31 70 3600194 [email protected] www.gppac.net Production: Bureau M&O, Amsterdam Layout: studio 10, Amsterdam Printed by Meco Offset B.V. Cover photo: Mobilising for Early Response: Early Warning and Early Response Conference, co-hosted by West Africa Network for Peacebuilding (WANEP) and GPPAC, Abidjan, Côte D’Ivoire, February 2009. For more information on this manual or GPPAC engagement with the media, please contact Marte Hellema, Programme Manager Public Outreach at the GPPAC Global Secretariat through [email protected] © 2010 The Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any way without full attribution Table of Contents Preface 4 1 Analyzing & Mapping Conflicts 7 2 Understanding Influence of Media Discourse on Conflict Situations 20 3 Understanding Our Influence on the Media 26 4 Responding to Conflicts Using Print and Online Media 28 5 Pitching Conflict Stories to Media 36 6 Passing on the Knowledge 46 A Final Note from the Author 51 Resources 52 Journalism & Ethics Organizations 52 Academic Study in Journalism Ethics 52 Books on Media & Ethics 52 Media Reform Advocacy Groups: 53 The Media Monopoly/Corporate Media Ownership: 53 About the Author 54 GPPAC Media Training Manual 3 Preface Welcome to the GPPAC’s Media Training Manual The Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed violent conflict, and you believe that media is a Conflict (GPPAC) is a world-wide civil society-led powerful medium for effecting social change.
    [Show full text]